DOCSLIB.ORG

An Empire's New Holy Land: the Byzantine Period Author(S): S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Empire's New Holy Land: the Byzantine Period Author(S): S An Empire's New Holy Land: The Byzantine Period Author(s): S. Thomas Parker Source: Near Eastern Archaeology, Vol. 62, No. 3 (Sep., 1999), pp. 134-180 Published by: The American Schools of Oriental Research Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3210712 Accessed: 13/12/2008 13:33 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=asor. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The American Schools of Oriental Research is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Near Eastern Archaeology. http://www.jstor.org By S. Thomas Parker A Aerialview of QasrBshir (castra praetorii Mobeni), a fort erected between 293 and 305 CEon the plateau east of the Dead Sea, OR MANYYEARS AFTER SYSTEMATIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH apparentlyfor a cavalrygarrison of ca. 150 troops. A typical began in Palestine, archaeologists treated the quadriburgium("four-towered fort"), its plan is dominated by large Byzantine period (fourth to early seventh centuries projectingtowers on each corner.The internalplan consistsof rooms CE) as a poor step-child. This was primarily because built around a centralcourtyard. Photograph byJ. Sauer. the period fell outside the "biblical"era. Other factors con- tributedas well. Many classicalarchaeologists in the nineteenth > Silvermedallion bearingthe image of Constantinedepicted with and early twentieth centuries regarded the Byzantine cen- the "chi-rho"emblem on his emperor'shelmet. Though many regard turiesas "post-classical."The relativelyfew Islamicarchaeologists the reign of Constantine,the first Christianemperor, as inaugurating working in Palestine largely ignored the Byzantineera, except the Byzantineperiod, the reign of his predecessor,Diocletian (284- as the precursor to their own period of interest. Moreover, 305), makes a more cogent starting point. Diocletiancarried out a the main focus of Byzantine archaeologists per se was the far-reachingreform and consolidationof the empire that sustained heartland of the Byzantine Empire, i.e., Anatolia and the its impactfor severalcenturies. Photograph ?Staatliche Munzsamm- Balkans. Thus it is no exaggeration to say that despite the lung, Munich. general intensity of archaeological research, the Byzantine era long remained one of the more poorly known periods in twentieth century Palestine, though it largely ignored the Palestine's long history. Byzantine period in terms of explicit goals, nevertheless con- This is ironic, for it was already clear in the nineteenth tributed much important new data. With some notable century that Palestine contained some of the most important exceptions-such as the Anglo-American excavations at archaeological remains in the Byzantine Empire, including Jerash (Kraeling 1938)-it was only after World War II that architecturalmonuments (the Church of the Holy Sepulcher many archaeologists focused on Byzantine Palestine. in Jerusalem) and mosaics (the Madaba mosaic map; Pic- In dramatic contrast, the half century or so since 1945 has cirillo and Alliata 1999). The surge of archaeological witnessed a veritable explosion of research on Byzantine survey and excavation in late nineteenth and early Palestine. The sheer volume of new data from documentary 134 Near EasternArchaeology 62:3 (1999) An Empire'sNew Holy Land I r~~~~~~~ HistoricalOutline The Byzantine A broad historical overview of the history of Palestine in the Byzantine period is necessary for placing the archaeo- logical data in context. Period From the outset, it should be stressed that the very term "Byzantine"is a modem, artificialterm for this period. The people of the Mediterranean world in the fourth and fifth centuries (all dates CEunless noted) considered them- selves very much part of the Roman Empire.After the collapse of the western empire in the late fifth century, the surviv- ing emperors at Constantinople in the East continued to consider themselves "Romans." In fact, down to the very day in 1453 when the Ottoman Turks breached the walls of Constantinople,its inhabitantsstill called themselves "Romans." It is only modern historians who have invented the term "Byzantine" (from the original Greek city of Byzantium, which the emperor Constantine refounded as Constantino- ple in 330, now Istanbul in Turkey).Modem scholars coined the term "Byzantine" to refer to the empire based at Con- stantinople that dominated the eastern Mediterranean throughout much of the medieval period, until its fall in 1453. But it should always be remembered that the "Byzantine Empire" was in origin simply the eastern half of the Roman Empire. For the period when this state ruled Pales- tine (from the fourth century until the Muslim conquest in the early seventh century), the "Roman" character of this Byzantine Empire was especially pervasive. In fact, these sources, surveys, and excavations is impressive. The flood centuries are now commonly referredto as "LateAntiquity" of new data has in turn engendered new historical synthe- (rather than "Early Medieval") by most historians, who ses and other analytical studies. All told, this new-found acknowledge the strong continuity with "ancient(i.e., Roman) wealth presents a daunting challenge in terms of presenting history." a representative survey. Archaeologists in Palestine have traditionally dated the This article nevertheless makes such an attempt. Con- beginning of the Byzantine period to the reign of the emperor siderations of space obviously make it a highly selective Constantine (306-337), the first Christian emperor. More survey of recent archaeological research on Byzantine Pales- specifically,some have suggested the date of 324, when Con- tine, focusing largely although not entirely on work since stantine defeated his rival Licinius and gained control of the 1945. The survey is not intended to be exhaustive or even eastern empire (Sauer1973). Yet is seems more useful to begin comprehensive. It aims merely to highlight some significant this survey with the reign of a predecessor,Diocletian (284-305), research, illustrate how this research has altered our picture usually considered the "firstByzantine emperor."This tough of Byzantine Palestine, and pose some issues for the soldier from the Balkans rose from obscurity through the future. ranks to the command of the Roman emperor's bodyguard We will first briefly review the history of the period, and then to the throne itself. The problems he faced upon the historical geography, and the issue of archaeologicalperi- assuming power were immense. During the previous half odization. Then we will examine some archaeologicalsources century (235-284) the empire had experienced frequent civil for the period, focusing on new documentary data, regional wars, catastrophicforeign invasions, and devastating plagues. surveys, excavations, and material cultural data. This exam- Consequently the population had declined, the economy was ination will include developments in methodology and trends in a shambles, and the very existence of the empire itself in publication. Finally,we will consider how all this new data seemed threatened. has shaped our understanding of Byzantine Palestine. Diocletian crushed all rivals, defeated various foreign Near EasternArchaeology 62:3 (1999) 135 invaders, restoredthe frontiers,and then embarked on a thor- Palestine. This province, heretofore a relative backwater on ough overhaul of the Roman state that touched nearly every the empire's southeastern periphery, suddenly vaulted to aspect of life-political, military, economic, social, and reli- unprecedented prominence as the home of the empire's new gious. Some of his reforms were successful, such as laying official religion, i.e., the "Holy Land" (Wilken 1992). As the groundwork for a new system of taxation and reforti- will be seen below, this had profound economic, political, fying the frontiers. Others, such as the Tetrarchy-a college and social consequences for the region. of four emperors who worked in concertbut in differentparts The fourth century was clearly a period of prosperity and of the empire-worked only as long as Diocletian himself growing population for Palestine, fueled by the return of sta- remained as senior emperor. Still other reforms, such as his bility after the serious problems of the mid-third century and Edict on MaximumPrices (an attempt to deal with rampant by direct imperial investment, including construction of inflation through an empire-wide system of wage and price churches and monasteries.In terms of security,nomadic Arab controls), were abject failures.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • View of Late Antiquity In
    ARAM, 23 (2011) 489-508. doi: 10.2143/ARAM.23.0.2959670 WALLS OF THE DECAPOLIS Dr. ROBERT SMITH (Mid-Atlantic Christian University) Walls were important to the citizens of the Decapolis cities.1 While the world- view of Late Antiquity interpreted the rise and fall of cities as ultimately being the result of divine intervention, the human construction of defensive walls was still a major civic concern. Walls, like temples, honored a city’s patron deities and fostered a sense of local identity and well-being. These structures, long a bulwark of independence and status for cities in the Levant,2 were present in the Hellenizing pre-Decapolis cities, permitted in the Decapolis during the Roman period and were promoted during the subsequent Byzantine period as well. Instead of fostering local rebellion against a distant Rome or later Con- stantinople, the construction of Decapolis city walls, like other components of the imperial architectural palette, was a strategic asset that served to cultur- ally unify the region’s ethnically and linguistically diverse population.3 The “spiritual walls” of cultural solidarity, established in Hellenism and continued by Rome, together with the physical walls of the Decapolis cities helped to preserve their identities for centuries. The Roman and Byzantine empires depended upon strong loyal cities like those of the Decapolis to sustain their rule in the Levant. WALLS OF PRE-DECAPOLIS CITIES IN THE PRE-ROMAN ERA Cities that would be counted as part of the Decapolis in the Roman Era were typically established in the Hellenistic era on the remains of ancient settle- ments.
    [Show full text]
  • Frogs Around the Pond: Some Images of the Mediterranean Sea In
    FROGS AROUND THE POND: SOME IMAGES OF THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA IN GREEK AND ROMAN CULTURE by SARAH JEAN CALDER TRAUT Under the Direction of Naomi Norman ABSTRACT This thesis describes some of the ways that Greek and Roman culture attempted to define the Mediterranean Sea. It surveys selected Greek and Roman authors who used the image of the Mediterranean Sea to talk about power and wealth. INDEX WORDS: Mediterranean Sea, Mediterranean Basin, Greek and Roman Culture, Mare Nostrum, Isidorus, Sallust, Julius Caesar, Livy, Ab Urbe Condita, Pomponius Mela, Pliny the Elder, Juvenal, Old Oligarch, Pseudo- Xenophon, Constitution of the Athenians, Thucydides, History, Cicero, De Provinciis Consularibus, Augustus, Res Gestae, Plutarch, Quaestiones Conviviales, Hesiod, Works and Days, Petronius, Satyricon, Lucian, The Ship or The Wishes. FROGS AROUND THE POND: SOME IMAGES OF THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA IN GREEK AND ROMAN CULTURE by SARAH JEAN CALDER TRAUT A.B., The University of Georgia, 2001 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS ATHENS, GEORGIA 2004 ©2004 Sarah Jean Calder Traut All Rights Reserved. FROGS AROUND THE POND: SOME IMAGES OF THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA IN GREEK AND ROMAN CULTURE by SARAH JEAN CALDER TRAUT Major Professor: Naomi Norman Committee: Robert Curtis Keith Dix Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia May 2004 iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to acknowledge the guidance that Dr. Naomi Norman has given me throughout my undergraduate and graduate schooling. Without her support, I should never have completed my thesis or my undergraduate degree.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maronites Cistercian Studies Series: Number Two Hundred Forty-Three
    The Maronites CISTERCIAN STUDIES SERIES: NUMBER TWO HUNDRED FORTY-THREE The Maronites The Origins of an Antiochene Church A Historical and Geographical Study of the Fifth to Seventh Centuries Abbot Paul Naaman Translated by The Department of Interpretation and Translation (DIT), Holy Spirit University Kaslik, Lebanon 2009 Cistercian Publications www.cistercianpublications.org LITURGICAL PRESS Collegeville, Minnesota www.litpress.org Maps adapted from G. Tchalenko, Villages antiques de la syrie du Nord (1953), T. II Pl. XXIII, Pl. XXIV, Pl. XXV. Used with permission. A Cistercian Publications title published by Liturgical Press Cistercian Publications Editorial Offices Abbey of Gethsemani 3642 Monks Road Trappist, Kentucky 40051 www.cistercianpublications.org © 2011 by Order of Saint Benedict, Collegeville, Minnesota. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, by print, microfilm, microfiche, mechanical recording, photocopying, translation, or by any other means, known or yet unknown, for any purpose except brief quotations in reviews, without the previous written permission of Liturgical Press, Saint John’s Abbey, PO Box 7500, Collegeville, Minnesota 56321-7500. Printed in the United States of America. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Naaman, Paul, 1932– The Maronites : the origins of an Antiochene church : a historical and geographical study of the fifth to seventh centuries / Paul Naaman ; translated by the Department of Interpretation and Translation (DIT), Holy Spirit University, Kaslik, Lebanon. p. cm. — (Cistercian studies series ; no. 243) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-87907-243-8 (pbk.) — ISBN 978-0-87907-794-5 (e-book) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Armies of the Hasmonaeans and Herod
    Texte und Studien zum Antiken Judentum herausgegeben von Martin Hengel und Peter Schäfer 25 The Armies of the Hasmonaeans and Herod From Hellenistic to Roman Frameworks by Israel Shatzman J.C.B. Möhr (Paul Siebeck) Tübingen Die Deutsche Bibliothek - CIP-Einheitsaufnahme Shatzman, Israel: The armies of the Hasmonaeans and Herod : from Hellenistic to Roman frameworks / by Israel Shatzman. - Tübingen : Mohr, 1991 (Texte und Studien zum antiken Judentum ; 25) ISBN 3-16-145617-3 NE: GT © 1991 J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) P.O. Box 2040, D-7400 Tübingen. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that permitted by copyright law) without the publisher's written permission. This applies particularly to re- productions, translations, microfilms and storage and processing in electronic systems. The book was typeset by Sam Boyd Enterprise in Singapore, printed by Guide-Druck in Tübingen on non-aging paper by Gebr. Buhl in Ettlingen and bound by Heinr. Koch in Tübingen. ISSN 0721-8753 MENAHEM STERN IN MEMORIAM Preface I became intrigued by the subject of this book in the course of my work on the military confrontation between the Jews and the Romans from the death of Herod to the War of Bar-Kokhva, which I was asked to contribute to Vol. VIII of the series The World History of the Jewish People: U. Rappaport (ed.), Judea and Rome (Masada Publishing Press, 1983, in Hebrew). While working on those chapters, I realized that no com- prehensive account had ever been written of the army of Herod, and as for the Hasmonaeans, there existed then only B.
    [Show full text]
  • Jews, Idumaeans, and Ancient Arabs
    Texte und Studien zum Antiken Judentum herausgegeben von Martin Hengel und Peter Schäfer 18 Jews, Idumaeans, and Ancient Arabs Relations of the Jews in Eretz-Israel with the Nations of the Frontier and the Desert during the Hellenistic and Roman Era (332 BCE - 70 CE) by Aryeh Kasher J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) Tubingen 1988 CIP-Titelaufnahme der Deutschen Bibliothek Kasher, Aryeh: Jews, Idumaeans, and ancient Arabs : relations of the Jews in Eretz-Israel with the nations of the frontier and the desert during the Hellenistic and Roman era (332 BCE — 70 CE) / by Aryeh Kasher. - Tübingen : Mohr, 1988 (Texte und Studien zum antiken Judentum ; 18) ISBN 3-16-145240-2 ISSN 0721-8753 NE: GT © 1988 J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) P. O. Box 2040, D-7400 Tübingen. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that permitted by copyright law) without the publisher's written permission. This applies paricularly to reproduc- tions, translations, microfilms and storage and processing in electronic systems. Typeset by Sam Boyd Enterprise in Singapore; graphic work by Peter Schweitrieg in Stuttgart; printed by Guide-Druck GmbH in Tübingen; bound by Heinrich Koch KG in Tübingen. Printed in Germany. Dedicated to my venerable teacher Professor Joshua Efron Foreword The purpose of this book is to focus the interest of the educated reader, the student, and the research scholar on a topic which so far has not attrac- ted adequate monographic attention. This review of relations between the Jews in Eretz-Israel and the nations of the frontier and the desert is pre- sented in a chronological framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Wall Painting and Stucco in Jordan: from Miniature to Megalography
    Dr. Claude Vibert-Guigue, Claude Vibert-Guigue UMR 8546, CNRS-ENS, AOROC Ecole Normale Supérieure 45 Rue d’Ulm Wall Painting And Stucco In Jordan: F-75005 Paris From Miniature To Megalography France Introduction 407-432); From the Decapolis to the Umayyad Every year new painted or stuccoed Palaces (Tell 1995: 375-382); Quṣayr ‘Amra decorations appear in Jordan, dating from (Vibert-Guigue and Bisheh 2007: 3-23). the Nabataean and Hellenistic periods to the The 2013 ICHAJ colloquium in Berlin Umayyad Caliphate1. For example, Petra was an opportunity to remind ourselves of regularly brings up new Nabataean examples and the archaeological importance of stucco and at Gerasa a recent late Hellenistic discovery on painted art in ancient Jordan. Three main points the lower terrace of the Zeus temple represents can be made. First, the transition from ‘art an important development in the history of stucco’ (mortar decoration with finishing relief) ancient wall-painting. In addition, conservation and ‘art painting’ (smooth surface, without interventions have brought new iconographic relief)4. Initially, under Greek influence, the indications and readings to light, as at Quṣayr plastering or coating imitated monumental ‘Amra whose Umayyad paintings are inscribed ashlar masonry in stucco, within the context on the UNESCO World Heritage list. Known of interior decoration. Stucco block work since Musil’s publication (1907), from 2011 modelled in relief with drafted marginal onwards new pictures and inscriptions hidden masonry and well- fitting joints were considered under excessive conservation measures dating essential. Second, figurative subjects can be back to the mid-1970s have been spectacularly discussed as a significant evolution over time revealed2.
    [Show full text]
  • Relations Between Ancient Theatres, Landscape and Society Introduction
    Second International Conference on Science & Technology in Archaeology & Conservation, 7-12 December 2003, Jordan, actas, Fundación El Legado Andalusì, pp.243-256. Relations between Ancient Theatres, Landscape and Society Naif Haddad Dept. of Conservation Science, Queen Rania’s Institute of Tourism and Heritage, the Hashemite University, Zarqa 13115, Jordan, E-mail [email protected] Monder Jamhawi Dept. of Conservation Science, Queen Rania’s Institute of Tourism and Heritage, the Hashemite University, Zarqa 13115, Jordan, E-mail [email protected] Talal Akasheh Dept. of Conservation Science, Queen Rania’s Institute of Tourism and Heritage, the Hashemite University, Zarqa 13115, Jordan, E- mail [email protected] ABSTRACT In ancient Greece, the landscape and nature, with all their topographical and environmental changes, were influential in the design of theaters. While major locations of Greek and Hellenistic theatres were located within the temple complexes out in areas with great majestic natural views. Thus the spiritual feelings for the landscape affected their building concepts and the theatre was the model of this approach .The theatre in its architectural design reflected the actual social structure of the society, the theatrical presentations were considered as a big event. The Roman theatre as an introvert conception in relation with the landscape had a lot of differences in its architectural features. Unlike Greek theaters, which were situated on natural slopes, the Romans were not restricted to build their Theatres on the slopes of hills; the Romans created new structural elements that solve this problem like Vaults, Arches. With these structural elements they were able to build their theatres on flat areas and in different shapes of the topography and landscape of the city.
    [Show full text]
  • A Battle 2000 Years in the Making Luke 3:1-2
    John the Baptist A battle 2000 years in the making Luke 3:1-2 EUAGGELION KATA LOUKAN Luke 3 1 Now in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, when Pontius Pilate was governor of Judea, and Herod was tetrarch of Galilee, and his brother Philip was tetrarch of the region of Ituraea and Trachonitis, and Lysanias was tetrarch of Abilene, 2 in the high priesthood of Annas and Caiaphas, the word of God came to John, the son of Zacharias, in the wilderness. EUAGGELION KATA LOUKAN Genesis 25 •19 Now these are the records of the generations of Isaac, Abraham’s son: Abraham became the father of Isaac; 20 and Isaac was forty years old when he took Rebekah, the daughter of Bethuel the Aramean of Paddan-aram, the sister of Laban the Aramean, to be his wife. 21 Isaac prayed to the Lord on behalf of his wife, because she was barren; and the Lord answered him and Rebekah his wife conceived. 22 But the children struggled together within her; and she said, “If it is so, why then am I this way?” So she went to inquire of the Lord. 23 The Lord said to her, “Two nations are in your womb; And two peoples will be separated from your body; And one people shall be stronger than the other; And the older shall serve the younger.” EUAGGELION KATA LOUKAN Genesis 25 24 When her days to be delivered were fulfilled, behold, there were twins in her womb. 25 Now the first came forth red, all over like a hairy garment; and they named him Esau.
    [Show full text]
  • Past Conferences
    ARAM FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: (Organised by Dr. Shafiq Abouzayd, University of Oxford) The Nabataeans 26-29 September 1989 TUESDAY 26 SEPTEMBER 1989 (Venue: St. Hugh’s College, University of Oxford) 14.00-16.30 Registration 17.00-18.30 Official opening by His Royal Highness Crown Prince Hasan of Jordan 19.00-21.00 Inaugural Dinner WEDNESDAY 27 SEPTEMBER 1989 (Venue: St. Hugh’s College, University of Oxford) Chairperson: Dr. Shafiq Abouzayd (University of Oxford) 09.30-10.05 Dr. Piotr Bienkowski (Liverpool Museum): “The chronology of Tawilan and the ‘Dark Age’ of Edom.” 10.05-10.40 Dr. John Bartlett (University of Dublin): “The situation between the end of the Edomite kingdom and the appearance of the Nabataeans.” 10.40-11.15 Tea/coffee 11.15-11.50 Dr. David F. Graf (University of Miami): “The origin of the Nabataeans.” 11.50-12.25 Dr. Manfred Lindner (Naturhistorische Gesellschaft, Nurnberg): “A unique Edomite/Nabataean archaeological site in the mountains of southern Jordan.” 12.25-13.00 Dr. Gerald Mattingly (Johnson Bible College): “Settlement patterns on the Moabite plateau from Iron Age through the Nabataean/ Roman period.” 13.00-14.30 Lunch Chairperson: Mr. Michael Macdonald (Oxford University) 14.30-15.05 Dr. William Jobling (University of Sydney): “Some new Thamudic and Nabataean inscription of the Hisma in southern Jordan.” 15.05-15.40 Dr. Philip C. Hammond (University of Utah): “The rise of a provincial state: Nabatene.” 15.40-16.10 Tea/coffee 16.10-16.45 Mr. Peter Parr (University of London): “The archaeology of the Petra town centre.” 16.45-17.10 Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology in Jordan Author(S): Bert De Vries and Pierre Bikai Source: American Journal of Archaeology, Vol
    Archaeology in Jordan Author(s): Bert de Vries and Pierre Bikai Source: American Journal of Archaeology, Vol. 97, No. 3 (Jul., 1993), pp. 457-520 Published by: Archaeological Institute of America Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/506366 Accessed: 16/07/2009 15:03 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=aia. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Archaeological Institute of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to American Journal of Archaeology. http://www.jstor.org Archaeology in Jordan BERT DE VRIES AND PIERRE BIKAI This installment of the annual newsletter on ar- chronologicaloverlap to achieve a ranking.
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement and History in Hellenistic, Roman, and Byzantine Galilee
    Texts and Studies in Ancient Judaism Texte und Studien zum Antiken Judentum Edited by Peter Schäfer (Princeton, NJ) Annette Y. Reed (Philadelphia, PA) Seth Schwartz (New York, NY) Azzan Yadin (New Brunswick, NJ) 127 Uzi Leibner Settlement and History in Hellenistic, Roman, and Byzantine Galilee An Archaeological Survey of the Eastern Galilee Mohr Siebeck Uzi Leibner, born 1970; PhD Studies at the Institute of Archaeology, Bar Ilan Univer- sity; Ramat Gan, Israel; 2006 Rothschild Postdoctoral Fellowship, Visiting Scholar at the Kelsey Museum of Classical Archaeology and the Frankel Center for Judaic Studies, Uni- versity of Michigan; 2007–2008 Mandel Research Position, the Scholion Inter disciplinary Research Center in Jewish Studies, Hebrew University of Jerusalem; since 2008 Lecturer at the Institute of Archaeology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Published with the assistance of The Ruth Amiran Fund for Archaeological Research of the Land of Israel The Authority for Research and Development, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem A donation in memory of Simi Mastey and Alice Esses. This work is since 01/2020 licensed under the license “Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International” (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). A complete version of the license text can be found at: https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access for the public good. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org. e-ISBN PDF 978-3-16- 151460-9 ISBN 978-3-16-149871-8 ISSN 0721-8753 (Texts and Studies in Ancient Judaism) Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbiblio- graphie; detailed bibliographic data is available on the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de.
    [Show full text]
  • Hannah M. Cotton
    Hannah M. Cotton Some Aspects of the Roman Administration of Judaea/Syria-Palaestina This paper falls into two parts: in the first part I discuss the provincialization of the territory that came to be called the province of Judaea, and later Syria-Palaes- tina1; in the second part I look at the administration of the so-called Jewish re- gion' of Judaea in the light of the recently published documents from the Judaean Desert. I Judaea came under direct Roman rule only in 6 CE with the exile of Herod's son, the Tetrarch Archelaus. From the conquest of Judaea by Pompey in 63 BCE until 6 CE, Judaea was ruled first by descendants of the Hasmonaean house without royal title and later by the Herodian dynasty. Pompey reduced the extent of Jew- ish territory by annexing all the coastal cities and those of the Decapolis to the new province of Syria2. Judaea included then Judaea proper, Idumaea, Samaria, the Peraea and the Galilee. Under Herod the districts of Batanea, the Trachonitis and Auranitis were added to his kingdom3. After Herod's death the kingdom was divided between his three sons. Archelaus had Judaea proper, Idumaea, and Sama- ria including the cities of Caesarea, Samaria-Sebaste, Jerusalem and Joppa - this part came under direct Roman rule upon his exile in 6 CE. Philip received Bat- anea, the Trachonitis and Auranitis — districts with mixed population where the non-Jewish element prevailed. It is little wonder that after his death they were attached to the province of Syria. Herod Antipas received the Galilee and the Peraea.
    [Show full text]