Three Rivers Access Study

Prepared for: Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council

Prepared by: edr Companies & Clark Patterson Lee 217 Montgomery Street, Suite 1000 Syracuse, 13202 Telephone: 315.471.0688 Facsimile: 315.471.1061 December 2011 THREE RIVERS ACCESS STUDY

Prepared for: Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council

Prepared by: edr Companies & Clark Patterson Lee

Final Report December 2011

This report was funded in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The views and opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. Department of Transportation.

For further information contact:

Aaron McKeon, Project Manager Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council 126 N. Salina St., 100 Clinton Square, Suite 100, Syracuse, NY 13202 PHONE: (315) 422-5716 FAX (315) 422-7753 www.smtcmpo.org

Page | ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council would like to thank the members of the Study Advisory Committee who dedicated their time, talent and energy in an effort to facilitate a comprehensive study of the potential transportation impacts from redevelopment of the Study Area. Gratitude is also expressed for the local residents, business owners, and Clay municipal staff who contributed valuable local knowledge to this effort.

Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council: James D’Agostino, Director Megan Vitale, Principal Transportation Planner Aaron McKeon, Project Manager

Study Advisory Committee: Naomi Bray, Town of Clay Counselor Bruce Johnson, Town of Clay Counselor Mark Territo, Town of Clay Planning Commissioner Paul Gilbert, Town of Schroeppel Counselor Megan Costa, SOCPA Jeanie Gleisner, Regional Planning and Development Board James Effinger, Central New York Regional Transportation Authority John Reichert, NYS Department of Transportation Dan Petrella, NYS Department of Transportation Tim Frasier, NYS Canal Corporation Sharon Leighton, NYS Canal Corporation Joanne March, NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Terry Morgan, Onondaga County, Department of Transportation Martin Weiss, Oswego County Department of Community Development, Tourism and Planning

Page | iii This page left intentionally blank.

Page | iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The focus of this study is to assess the overall capacity of County Route 57 in light of possible future redevelopment of Three Rivers Point. In an effort to appropriately plan for future growth, the Town of Clay collaborated with Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Center (SMTC) to engage in transportation planning based on smart growth principles. The targeted study area under review includes Three Rivers Point and adjacent lands, as well as lands on the north side of in the Town of Schroeppel.

With the guidance of a Study Advisory Committee and the input from the community, SMTC and the consulting team of edr Companies and Clark Patterson Lee completed this access study for the Three Rivers Point area. The study involved understanding the opportunities and constraints of the existing area, developing alternative redevelopment scenarios, assessing the possible traffic impacts from the proposed hypothetical redevelopment and determining plausible mitigation measures.

Historically, Three Rivers Point, which is immediately adjacent to the confluence of the Seneca, Oswego, and Oneida Rivers, has been a very attractive destination for many who have lived in the region. Native Americans and early European settlers considered this site a very unique place and were attracted by the surrounding natural beauty and easy access. Over the years, an active transportation network evolved. Railroad tracks were first laid around 1871, followed by the New York State Barge Canal in 1918. Eventually County Route 57 provided access for cars and trucks traveling north to Oswego. These transportation systems were used primarily for commercial purposes, which eventually led to commercial uses in the area. By the mid 1900’s an entertainment night club called the Three Rivers Inn developed and became well-known throughout the region. Today, many of the commercial uses have closed down. The Seneca, Oswego and Oneida rivers are used primarily by recreational boaters, and single-family residential is the primary land use in the area.

Over the last decade or so, for a variety of reasons, this area has received much attention for its cultural heritage and natural resources. The governing towns have expressed an interest in preserving these resources and supporting potential economic development. Many existing studies and land use plans that address one or more of these issues were reviewed for this study. As indicated in all of the existing plans and studies, there is an interest in redeveloping this area in a sustainable manner. One primary concern is whether redevelopment of this area with a balanced mix of residential and commercial uses would overwhelm the transportation capacity of County Route 57. Based on known land use goals for this area with the application of smart growth principles, two alternative redevelopment concepts were created. Based on these concepts and proposed uses, an analysis was conducted of the potential traffic impacts on County Route 57 and four strategic intersections. This analysis was compared to the existing conditions and future No-Build conditions of the same transportation network.

The traffic analysis revealed that the possible impacts would not be significantly more than if no development occurred. Essentially, the impacts from increased traffic could be mitigated with appropriate measures, such as a turn lane and traffic signal. Based on these results, with some improvements, the transportation network does have capacity for additional commercial and residential growth. It is noted that certain intersections currently present vehicular safety and access issues, such as the intersection of Maider Road and County Route 57, which should be addressed regardless of future growth.

Page | v TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction...... 1 1.1 Study Area and Method...... 2 1.1.1 Study Area...... 2 1.1.2 Study Goals and Method...... 3 2.0 Relevant Studies...... 5 2.1 Town of Clay Three Rivers Point Redevelopment Study...... 5 2.2 Town of Clay Draft Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan...... 6 2.3 Brownfield Opportunity Area Program Application...... 8 2.4 Town of Clay Draft Northern Land Use Study...... 8 2.5 New York State Recreationway Plan...... 9 2.6 Clay-Cicero Route 31 Transportation Study...... 10 2.7 Other Route 31 & 57 Transportation Studies...... 10 2.8 Town of Schroeppel Comprehensive Plan...... 11 3.0 Study Area Profile...... 13 3.1 Regional Context...... 13 3.1.1 Demographics...... 13 3.1.2 Site Access...... 13 3.2 Historic Context...... 14 3.3 Physical Site Conditions...... 15 3.4 County Route 57 Transportation Corridor...... 18 4.0 Study Area Assessment...... 20 4.1 Opportunities and Constraints...... 20 4.2 County Route 57 Corridor ...... 22 4.2.1 Current Capacity Analysis...... 22 4.2.2 Future No-Build Conditions...... 23 5.0 REDEVELOPMENT AND LAND USE CONCEPTS...... 25 5.1 Redevelopment Vision and Goals...... 25 5.2 Redevelopment Concepts...... 26 5.2.1 Concept Alternative 1...... 26 5.2.2 Concept Alternative 2...... 26 5.2.3 Land Use Plan...... 27 5.2.4 Summary...... 27 Page | vi 6.0 Public Input...... 29 Figures...... 47 7.0 Traffic Assessment For Future Alternative Concepts...... 30 Figure 1. Study Area...... 48 Figure 2. Regional Context Map...... 49 7.1 Traffic Assessment Method...... 30 Figure 3. Primary Study Area...... 50 7.2 Potential Impacts...... 34 Figure 4. Study Areas - 2000 Three Rivers Study...... 51 7.3 Recommended Mitigation Measures...... 35 Figure 5. Context - 2000 Three Rivers Study...... 52 7.3.1 Traffic Calming...... 35 Figure 6. Character Studies - 2000 Three Rivers Study...... 53 7.3.2 Road Realignment...... 35 Figure 7. Plan/Land Use - 2000 Three Rivers Study...... 54 7.3.3 Potential for Passenger Rail Service...... 36 Figure 8. Zoning and Property Ownership, Town of Clay...... 55 7.3.4 Signal Timings...... 36 Figure 9. Opportunities & Constraints, Town of Clay...... 56 7.3.5 Turn Lane and Signal...... 36 Figure 10. Zoning and Property Ownership, Town of Schroeppel...... 57 8.0 Assessment Of Alternative Concepts...... 39 Figure 11. Opportunities & Constraints, Town of Schroeppel...... 58 8.1 Study Goal 1...... 39 Figure 12. Redevelopment Concept Alternative 1...... 59 8.2 Study Goal 2...... 40 Figure 13. Redevelopment Concept Alternative 2 (Preliminary)...... 60 8.3 Study Goal 3...... 41 Figure 14. Redevelopment Concept Alternative 2...... 61 8.4 Study Goal 4...... 41 Figure 15. Land Use Plan...... 62 9.0 Implementation Strategies...... 43 Appendices...... 63 9.1 Regulatory framework...... 43 Appendix A : Public Involvement Plan...... 64 9.1.1 Town zoning regulations...... 43 Appendix B : Traffic Volume Figures...... 73 9.1.2 Permitting requirements...... 44 Appendix C : Synchro 6 Reports...... 80 9.2 Infrastructure Improvements...... 44 Appendix D : Trip Generation Calculations & No-Build Traffic Volume Calculations...105 9.3 Potential Funding Sources...... 45 Appendix E : Public Comments...... 109 List of Tables Appendix F : Site Generated Traffic Volume Figures...... 120 Table 1. Sociodemographic Profile...... 13 Appendix G : Trip Generation Calculations Table 2. Total Traffic Volume 2005, 2009/2010...... 19 and Future Build Traffic Volume Calculations...... 127 Table 3a Signalized Intersections Level of Service...... 22 Table 3b Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service...... 22 Table 4. Summary of Intersection Level of Service 2005 & 2009/2010...... 23 Table 5. 2009/2010 & 2020 Future No-Build Level of Service...... 24 Table 6. Additional Peak Hour Vehicles Using Gaskin Road...... 31 Table 7. Land Use Assumptions For Traffic Analysis...... 33 Table 8. Summary of Site Generated Volumes...... 34 Table 9. Level of Service and Delay (in seconds)...... 38 Page | vii This page left intentionally blank.

Page | viii 1.0 INTRODUCTION

This is an access study of Three Rivers Point on creating redevelopment scenarios for the Study • Syracuse Onondaga County Planning and adjacent lands located at the confluence of Area and Clark Patterson Lee analyzed potential Agency the Oswego, Seneca, and Oneida Rivers in the traffic impacts generated from each redevelopment • Central New York Regional Planning and Town of Clay, Onondaga County, and the Town scenario. Development Board of Schroeppel, Oswego County, New York. The A Study Advisory Committee (SAC) was • Central New York Regional Transportation Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council formed by SMTC to include various stakeholder Authority (CENTRO) (SMTC) on behalf of the Town of Clay completed representatives. SAC members were responsible • New York State Canal Corporation this study as part of the 2010-2012 Unified for reviewing and critiquing the redevelopment • New York State Department of Transporta- Planning Work Program (UPWP). The SMTC scenarios from their professionals perspective. tion, Region 3 retained the consulting team of edr Companies and Agency and municipal government representation • New York State Department of Environ- Clark Patterson Lee to complete this access study on the SAC included: mental Conservation for the Three Rivers Point area (Access Study). This • Town of Clay Access Study includes a primary area, made up of A total of four SAC meetings were held over • Town of Schroeppel Three Rivers Point and adjacent lands, as well as the course of this study to discuss the various • Onondaga County Department of the southern peninsula of the Town of Schroeppel, nuances regarding the Study Area and to finalize Transportation and a secondary area, the County Route 57 corridor the boundaries of the Study Area. from 57A (to the north) and State Route 31 (to the • Oswego County Department of Commu- south) ( Study Area) (see Figure 1). edr focused nity Development, Tourism and Planning This study’s progress unfolded in three stages. The

View of Three Rivers Point from Route 57.

Page | 1 first stage consisted of understanding the historic data. A No-Build growth analysis was conducted 1.1 Study Area and Method influences, community context, current land uses, to provide a baseline assessment to which future zoning regulations, natural features and overall redevelopment concepts can be compared. 1.1.1 Study Area conditions of the Study Area. The second stage The focus of this Access Study is to determine The Study Area is located in the Towns of Clay consisted of developing alternative redevelopment redevelopment opportunities for the primary area and Schroeppel, the southern boundary of which scenarios and understanding the potential traffic with an understanding of the level of potential is approximately 2.5 miles north of the City of impacts generated from each redevelopment traffic impacts redevelopment may have on the Syracuse in northern Onondaga County. To the option. The third stage consisted of assessing transportation network that services the Study west of the Study Area is the Town of Lysander and traffic impacts and mitigation options for each Area. Three Rivers Point has been underutilized to the north is the Town of Schroeppel, Oswego redevelopment scenario. for the last two decades and the Town of Clay is County (see Figures 1 and 2). Initially this study This report includes a summary of existing relevant very interested in encouraging its revitalization. At focused on redevelopment of only town-owned town and regional transportation and land use the same time, however, the town is acutely aware lands in the Study Area. After critical review planning studies. It also describes the existing of the many complex traffic congestion issues its and consideration of potential opportunities conditions of the Study Area, including an analysis residents, visitors and business owners experience and constraints, SMTC revisited the primary of local traffic issues. The traffic analysis focuses daily. Thus, assessing the potential transportation study boundary and expanded it to extend to the on the four main intersections in the Study Area impacts from redevelopment alternatives will help waterfront and to include strategic adjacent lands. (see Section 1.1.1 Study Area) and consists of peak the town proactively and intelligently plan for and Some of this property is underutilized and would hour volumes, vehicular delays and level of service manage growth in the Three Rivers Study Area. allow for potential realignment of the Maider Road

View of at Three Rivers Point.

Page | 2 intersection with the CSX Rail line and County 1.1.2 Study Goals and Method were conducted between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m., Route 57 (see Figure 3 for existing locations). The weekday evening traffic peak turning movement The goals of this study are essentially to understand final limits of the Study Area were reviewed and counts were conducted between 4:00 p.m. and the potential traffic impacts redevelopment of the discussed during the first SAC meeting and revisited 6:00 p.m., and Saturday midday turning movement Study Area would have on County Route 57 and after the second SAC meeting, along with other counts were conducted between 11: 00 a.m. and the four identified intersections (see Section 1.1.1 issues regarding land ownership, former land uses 1:00 p.m. herein). The specific study goals are: and relevant planning studies. It was determined Once the data were collected and the profile of the that this Access Study should be expanded across 1. Develop two alternative concepts that Study Area was understood, the traffic volumes the Oneida River to include the land south of Hoag respect the natural resource protection, were analyzed to determine the Level of Service Drive on the Schroeppel peninsula. waterfront revitalization, and brownfield redevelopment goals set forth in Town of (LOS) for each of the four intersections in the The primary area in this study includes study corridor. Capacity analyses were performed Clay’s existing plans. approximately 150 acres in the Town of Schroeppel, to determine the LOS under existing as well as the 2. Understand the potential traffic impacts with approximately 6,767 feet of shoreline, and 85 future (2020) No-Build conditions. A No-Build generated from each alternative concept. acres in the Town of Clay, with approximately 3,136 future analysis considers growth occurring in the 3. Assess the potential for multi-modal feet of shoreline, which is a small but significant general area at a predetermined modest rate and accessibility at Three Rivers Point. section of the 26 miles of shoreline within the Town no additional development. The analysis of existing of Clay. The secondary area includes 3.06 miles of 4. Invite the community to review and and No-Build conditions were used as a baseline County Route 57, which is a north-south highway discuss redevelopment options. to which the projected traffic impacts from the connecting the City of Syracuse to Oswego, and The methodology for this study occurred in three two redevelopment alternative concepts were four strategic intersections along Route 57 corridor stages; first, developing an existing conditions compared. (see Figure 1). profile of the Study Area, second, developing The second stage consisted of developing two The four intersections included in this Access two alternative mixed-use concepts for the Study alternative redevelopment concepts for the Town of Study are: Area, and third, assessing possible traffic impacts Clay portion of the Study Area and a land use plan 1. County Route 57 and New York State Route generated from each concept. The first stage for that portion in the Town of Schroeppel. Existing included reviewing existing plans and studies, 31 residential uses in the Study Area were assumed collecting relevant traffic, land use, and census 2. County Route 57 and Verplank Road to remain residential in both alternative concepts. data, and visiting the Study Area in July 2010. 3. County Route 57 and Maider Road The third stage consisted of conducting a traffic Weekday and Saturday midday turning movement 4. County Route 57 and County Road 57A analysis. Possible traffic impacts were analyzed data were collected by SMTC in 2009 and 2010. based on the two hypothetical redevelopment Weekday morning turning movement counts scenarios. This traffic analysis was compared to the

Page | 3 current conditions and future No-Build conditions. scenarios. Some local residents commented on This was followed with the identification of possible their preference to keep the area rural in character, mitigation strategies. others indicated their interest in incorporating trails that would allow for access to the waterfront Community input was sought at key milestones during all seasons. Some commented on the throughout this study (see Appendix A). On relative safety at certain intersections along County November 17, 2010 the two development Route 57 in the Study Area as well as the occasional concepts were presented to and reviewed by the congestion at the intersection of Routes 31 and community. After an initial overview, the full group 57 (see Appendix E). After reviewing the public’s (approximately 40 people) was divided into two comments and potential traffic related impacts, it smaller groups to review and comment on each was noted by the SAC that the results of this study alternative concept (see Appendix E). After specific will serve the Towns of Clay and Schroeppel as comments were shared, additional discussion with a solid basis from which they can review future the full group was facilitated. The SAC then met development proposals for the Study Area at Three after this meeting to review the proposed alternative Rivers Point. concepts in light of the public input. In response thereto, Alternative Concept 2 was revised to reflect the community’s preference for future uses at the Three Rivers Point. The two alternative concepts (including the land use plan) then underwent a traffic impact analysis. The results of that analysis were shared with the community on June 29, 2011. After the potential impacts were presented, a community discussion was facilitated, with the goal of garnering opinions and concerns. The primary focus for this study was again explained as an exercise to understand how much growth could occur in the Study Area before the existing roadway capacity was overwhelmed and in need of significant improvements. It was also noted that the two alternative concepts were hypothetical

Page | 4 2.0 RELEVANT STUDIES

Historic Three Rivers Point and the Erie Canal character and sensitive to the historic, cultural, those goals while re-connecting the community to System have received much attention regarding scenic and natural resources. the waterfront, celebrating the history of Three Rivers strategic planning for economic development. Point, and promoting mixed-use development (see Also, the Town of Clay has experienced significant Figures 6 & 7). The scope of the 2000 study did 2.1 Town of Clay Three Rivers Point growth over the last decade and has undertaken not include specific implementation strategies or multiple studies evaluating its local resources in Redevelopment Study assessment of potential impacts from the preferred light of growth pressures. The Town of Schroeppel, In 2000, the Town of Clay retained edr to prepare mixed-use development; consequently, the viability however, has experienced significantly less alternative development concepts for Three Rivers of the preferred alternative was never measured. development pressure. Many of these town and Point which included waterfront properties to the In summary, the 2000 study was an initial effort at regionally-based planning studies are relevant to east of County Route 57 and a 66-acre brownfield understanding the potential redevelopment options this Access Sstudy and the Three Rivers Study area formerly used by Cibro Petroleum Products and land uses for the Three Rivers area and as Area. A summary review of the most relevant of for storing fuel oil and asphalt (see Figure 4). The such, acts as a platform from which alternative these studies is provided below, with a focus on study goals included creating a marina/boating concepts can be further developed. The primary understanding each study’s recommendation(s) facility, preserving historic, cultural and sensitive difference between the 2000 study and this Access for this Study Area. Interestingly, all the relevant environmental features, capturing scenic views, Study is the assessment of the potential traffic recommendations for this area are compatible in developing a recreational tourism experience and impacts from the redevelopment scenarios. In that they support sustainable redevelopment of the improving transportation connections (see Figure this study the viability of each alternative concept Study Area in a way that is respectful of the area’s 5). The preferred alternative concept addressed will be measured and mitigation opportunities will

Approaching Three Rivers Point from Gaskin Road.

Page | 5 be identified where appropriate. Implementation revitalization of the waterfront corridor. The Draft Section 1.1. Concentrate development and strategies for potential redevelopment will also be LWRP (Town of Clay, 2008) includes waterfront redevelopment in or adjacent to traditional included. development policies for redevelopment along waterfront communities. the waterfront corridor, and suggests future Section 1.2. Ensure that development or uses development projects within the waterfront take appropriate advantage of their waterfront 2.2 Town of Clay Draft Local Waterfront corridor must be consistent with these policies. Revitalization Plan The LWRP policies address issues relative to the location. following four different waterfront conditions: Section 1.3. Protect stable residential areas. In 2008 the Town of Clay initiated development 1) Developed waterfront, 2) Natural waterfront, Section 1.4. Maintain and enhance natural of its draft Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan 3) Public waterfront and 4) Working waterfront, areas, recreation, open space and agricultural (Draft LWRP) by inventorying its local waterfront which are summarized as follows: lands. revitalization area, which includes approximately 26 miles of shoreline along the Oneida, Seneca Section 1.5. Minimize adverse impacts of new 1) Developed Waterfront Policies: and Oswego Rivers. A Waterfront Stakeholders development or redevelopment. Group, which included private property owners, Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in Policy 2. Preserve historic resources of the representatives of homeowner associations and the waterfront area that enhances community waterfront area. business owners who live and/or work in the character, preserves open space, makes efficient waterfront corridor, served as the LWRP advisory use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a Section 2.1. Maximize preservation and reten- committee. The committee met on three occasions waterfront location, and minimizes adverse effects tion of historic resources. to discuss and identify the future vision for of development. Section 2.2. Protect and preserve archaeo-

View of cottages in the Town of Schroeppel at the confluence of three rivers.

Page | 6 logical resources. quality and quantity. Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Section 2.3. Protect and enhance resources Section 5.5. Protect and conserve the quality waterfront area. that are significant to the waterfront culture. and quantity of potable water. Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and the waterfront area from solid waste and hazardous resources throughout the waterfront area. function of the ecosystem. substances and wastes. Section 3.1. Protect and improve visual qual- Section 6.1. Protect and restore ecological ity throughout the waterfront area. quality. 3) Public Waterfront Policies Section 3.2. Protect aesthetic values asso- Section 6.2. Protect and restore significant Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and ciated with recognized areas of high scenic coastal fish and wildlife habitats. recreational use of, the waterway, public lands, and quality. Section 6.3. Protect and restore freshwater public resources of the waterfront area. wetlands. Section 9.1. Promote appropriate and 2) Natural Waterfront Policies Section 6.4. Protect vulnerable fish, wild- adequate physical public access and recre- Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and life, and plant species, and rare ecological ation throughout the waterfront area. natural resources from flooding and erosion. communities. Section 9.2. Provide public visual access Section 4.2. Preserve and restore natural Section 6.5. Protect natural resources and from public lands to waterfront lands and protective features. associated values in identified regionally waters or open space at all sites where physi- Section 4.6. Consider sea level rise when important natural areas. cally practical. siting and designing projects involving substantial public expenditures.

Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply. Section 5.2. Manage land use activities and use best management practices to minimize non-point pollution of waterfront areas. Section 5.3. Protect and enhance the quality of waterfront area waters. Section 5.4. Limit the potential for adverse impacts of watershed development on water View of docks on Oneida River.

Page | 7 Section 9.3. Preserve the public interest in 2.3 Brownfield Opportunity Area Program is still pending and when it is acted upon this and use of lands and waters held in public Application Access Study may be concluded. It is anticipated trust by the State, and other public entities. that the recommendations in this Access Study In 2009 the Town of Clay submitted an application Section 9.4. Assure public access to public will be considered and directly influence actions for funding to participate in the Nomination Phase trust lands and navigable waters. taken when planning for the proposed Brownfield of the NYS Department of State’s Brownfield Opportunity Area. Opportunity Area Program and to complete a 4) Working Waterfront Policies study of the identified Brownfield Opportunity Policy 10. Protect water-dependent uses and Area (BOA), the boundary of which is very similar 2.4 Town of Clay Draft Northern Land Use promote siting of new water-dependent uses in to this primary Study Area. The application Study suitable locations. provides a broad inventory of the tax parcels in the This planning study by the Town of Clay’s Department proposed Study Area, which includes former land Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine of Planning and Development has been ongoing uses (with a focus on the former industrial uses), resources. for a few years. The purpose of the proposed current land uses, property ownership, natural Section 11.2. Provide for commercial and Northern Land Use Study (Town of Clay, 2011) resources, infrastructure systems, the need to is to provide the Town of Clay with an analysis of recreational use of marine resources. clean up known brownfield sites and the potential existing conditions and the potential impacts from Section 11.4. Promote recreational use of to reclaim or recapture the local waterfront with possible build out scenarios based on the town’s marine resources. future redevelopment of the area. The application existing zoning and land use regulations. The study Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands. Section 12.3. Minimize adverse impacts on agriculture from unavoidable conversion of agricultural land.

The draft LWRP is currently undergoing review by the NYS Department of State Division of Coastal Resources. Three Rivers Point is specifically identified in the Draft LWRP as an area for revitalization with mixed-use development as the preferred land use.

Example of nearby waterway access.

Page | 8 focuses on the predominantly undeveloped areas consideration when developing the alternative Canal Harbors. The Canal System was divided into north of Route 31 and north of NY State Route development scenarios for this Access Study. fifteen segments, which were accorded thematic 481 in the eastern section of the town, including characteristics. The section of canal that runs along this Study Area. The goal of the study is to identify the Study Area is included in the “Gateway to the 2.5 New York State Erie Canal the preferred uses and development densities for Great Lakes” segment. It is at Three Rivers Point specific areas and how to structure the town’s Recreationway Plan that the Erie Canal portion of the NYS Barge Canal zoning and land use regulations to encourage such In 1992 the New York State Canal Corporation System connects to the Oswego River/Oswego uses in the northern section of Clay. In general, was established as a subsidiary of the NYS Canal, which ultimately empties into . the study recommends that future development Thruway Authority, with the focus of operating, The interpretive opportunities for this segment take environmental constraints into consideration, preserving and renewing the Canal System for of the Canal System, as identified in the 1995 emphasize waterfront development, incorporate recreation and economic development. The Canal Recreationway Plan, include water transportation, “Smart Growth” principles and promote circulation Recreation Commission was then established recreation and military history. The Recreationway within and between neighborhoods. Specific and charged with the responsibility for preparing Plan encourages preserving and celebrating the recommendations for the Three Rivers Study Area and periodically revising a Recreationway Plan, historic and cultural resources associated with the include: which was developed in 1995. The 1995 NYS Canal System, while creating and/or enhancing 1. Expand sewers along Gaskin Road to Canal Recreationway Plan (Beyer, 1995) presents recreational opportunities along the canal which service Gaskin Road, Linda Lane and the strategic implementation steps for the development may directly or indirectly foster economic Three Rivers Area. of the Canal Recreationway including specific development for the surrounding communities. 2. Extend the municipal water system in the areas west of Route 481. 3. Create a Planned Development District at Three Rivers for mixed commercial and residential development. 4. Create a riverfront district as an overlay for waterfront properties.

It is noted that in 2010 the Town of Clay acted on the recommendation to create a planned development district and rezoned several parcels in the primary Study Area as Planned Development District. The Potential area for redevelopment at Three Rivers. other specific recommendations were taken into

Page | 9 2.6 Clay-Cicero Route 31 Transportation Study Even though the Clay-Cicero Route 31 transportation • Build new local road connections in the study covered an area broader than this Access Clay commercial area through developer is a critical east-west Study, its assessment of the western section of mitigation. transportation corridor through the Towns of Route 31 at the intersection of County Route 57 • Require new development to include Clay and Cicero. In 2010 the SMTC completed north to Verplank Road is relevant to this Access pedestrian, bicycle, and transit the Clay-Cicero Route 31 Transportation Study Study. The study’s full set of recommendations (SMTC, 2010). This study reviewed and assessed accommodations. is intended to influence land use and growth potential impacts from future land use patterns and • Practice good access management in management decisions within both towns; study transportation alternatives specifically associated commercial areas. recommendations that are pertinent to this Access with the Route 31 corridor. The focus area for this • Require roadway connections between Study include the following: study was the Route 31 corridor in the Towns of residential areas (discourage cul-de-sacs). • Revise the existing Town of Clay and Town Clay and Cicero, north to Verplank Road (Town of Cicero planning documents to include of Clay) and Mud Mill Road (Town of Cicero) and lower levels of future growth. 2.7 Other Route 31 & 57 Transportation Studies south to Route 481. The issues reviewed during • New development should focus on this study were: The recommendations of the Clay – Cicero Route 31 increasing density and mixing uses. • regional accessibility Transportation Study do not stand alone. For many • Enhance transit service, with supportive • arterial congestion years the Town of Clay has been concerned about land use practices. • development pressure, and increased traffic congestion along County Route • Upgrade Verplank Road. • coordinated planning 57, with specific concerns at its intersection with Route 31. In 1999 the Route 31 & Route 57 Land Use and Circulation Study was prepared for the Town of Clay (CHA, 1999) and the area was again studied in 2006 in the Route 31 & Route 57 Corridor Study (FRA, 2006). This intersection and the two corridors (Routes 57 and 31) are heavily used and the vehicular traffic congestion will continue as development continues to increase. The town’s ongoing challenge is to manage improvements to the Town of Clay’s transportation network so that it keeps pace with future commercial and residential Railroad bridge and tracks crossing Oneida River along County Route 57. growth. Based on these two transportation studies,

Page | 10 some recommended transportation improvements maintaining at least 75% existing vegetation with Oswego Rivers much of which is owned by New include: buildings setback a minimum of 100 feet from the York State Canal Corporation and currently leased • Improving the full spectrum of connectiv- waters edge. It is also the Town’s goal to promote by private residents. Nevertheless, low-impact ity for alternative active transportation, i.e. environmentally compatible development by recreational opportunities could be captured along biking and walking. planning for growth in and near existing municipal these shorelines, giving residents and visitors a • Creating a network of connected streets water systems, such as the Village of Phoenix venue to enjoy the beauty in this area. throughout the town, which allows for water system, or natural aquifers such as the Sand Ridge Aquifer. The strategy is to encourage growth alternative transportation routes. where adequate water supply currently exists. • Encouraging development patterns (commercial and residential) that support In addition to encouraging environmentally sound active transportation, alternative trans- growth; the Town is focused on providing adequate portation routes, and, where appropriate, recreational community facilities for all town slows vehicular traffic. residents. A Plan strategy to achieve this is to require a minimum of 10% of land to be set aside for parkland in new residential developments. In 2.8 Town of Schroeppel Comprehensive Plan support of this goal, the Town encourages using The Town of Schroeppel’s 1992 Comprehensive State Canal lands for public recreation. This Study land use plan (Plan) was updated in 2001 (Town Area does include shoreline along the Oneida and of Schroeppel, 2001). The Plan’s overall land use and development goals are to encourage economic growth where appropriate, protect environmentally sensitive areas, maintain rural character, and conserve natural resources. In support of its specific goal to “protect environmentally sensitive areas and conserve natural resources”, the Town is focused on protecting its environmentally sensitive shorelines from unsustainable development and its riverine communities along the Oneida and Oswego Rivers from unwanted flooding. A Plan strategy is to require a minimum 50-foot buffer, View of Three Rivers Point from residential Schroeppel neighborhood.

Page | 11 This page left intentionally blank.

Page | 12 3.0 STUDY AREA PROFILE

3.1 Regional Context higher in the Town of Lysander than in Clay or growth potential for canal tourism. At this juncture Schroeppel (See Table 1). Median age in all three in the Canal System boaters can access Onondaga 3.1.1 Demographics towns ranged between 35 and 38 years of age, and Lake to the south, the to the west, is trending upward. The 2008 American Community Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River to the The Study Area is located on the northwestern Survey estimate indicates a median age in Clay north and the Hudson River to the east. edge of the Town of Clay in Onondaga County and Lysander of between 37 and 42 years of age. and the southern tip of the Town of Schroeppel There are no designated bike lanes on the roads This statistic is important, as the age of the local in Oswego County. Development patterns in the that provide access to the Study Area. However, population will influence the future needs of the Town of Lysander, across the to the State Route 31 within the Study Area is contiguous community. west, and the Town of Schroeppel and Oswego with New York State Bike Route 5, a posted bicycle County, across the Oneida River to the north, may 3.1.2 Site Access route that runs east-west across New York State. influence (and be influenced by) redevelopment Additionally, the SMTC has rated the suitability opportunities in the Study Area. According to the This site is easily accessible by land or by water. of major roads in the area for use by cyclists, U.S. Census Bureau, in 2000, the Town of Clay Boaters can approach the area from points west, particularly commuters. County Route 57 is rated was significantly more populated than the Towns such as Baldwinsville, points north, such as Oswego as “good” for bicyclists in the segment between of Lysander and Schroeppel. Median income in the or Phoenix and points east, such as Brewerton. Three Rivers Bridge and Gaskin Road, “good” to Town of Lysander was higher than in the Towns of Three Rivers sits between the two busiest locks on “fair” for much of the segment between Gaskin Clay and Schroeppel and the same is true of the the Canal System (Lock 23 in Brewerton and Lock Road and Route 31 and “fair” south of Route median property value, which was substantially 24 in Baldwinsville), and consequently has strong 31. Maider Road and Verplank Road are rated as

Table 1. Sociodemographic Profile

Town of Town of Onondaga Town of Clay Lysander Schroeppel County Total population 58,805 19,285 8,566 458,336 Total housing units 23,398 7,448 3,590 196,633 Percentage 72.8% 81.2% 77.0% 64.5% owner-occupied Median Income $50,412 $59,128 $39,662 $40,847 (by household) Median property value $85,500 $108,300 $77,700 $85,400 Median age 35.0 37.6 36.5 36.3 U.S. Census Bureau, 2000. Page | 13 “average” while Gaskin Road is rated “fair.” These (where County Route 57 widens to four lanes). directional approaches (north, south, east and ratings are based on road conditions and other west) at this intersection include two through lanes The posted speed limit for County Route 57 is 40 features, such as speed limits, safety/comfort level and at least one exclusive left turn lane and one miles per hour. County Route 57 intersects with and pavement quality. right turn lane. Specific traffic volumes for each Maider Road, a local road, just south of Three intersection are included in Appendix B. At the In terms of automotive highway access, County Rivers Bridge where County Route 57 crosses other three intersections east-west movements Route 57 and Gaskin Road provide direct access the Oneida River. As it runs east, Maider Road are controlled by stop signs. The CSX rail line cuts to the site. NYS Route 31 is a principal east/ follows the shoreline for a quarter mile or so and through the Study Area and only provides freight west arterial that intersects with County Route 57 then intersects with Bonstead Road, another local services. less than two miles south of Three Rivers Point. road, which continues to follow the shoreline, Regionally, Interstate 481 provides access to this terminating at Morgan Road to the east (see Figure part of the Town of Clay and Town of Schroeppel 1). Maider Road dead-ends at I-481 about a mile 3.2 Historic Context at interchanges with State Route 31 and County east of County Route 57. The Study Area and its surrounds have a rich Route 57A. Of the four intersections to be studied (see Section story steeped in history and culture. As early as County Route 57 is a two-lane, urban minor arterial 1.1.1 Study Area, Page 2), three of them do not the 1790’s, this area was revered as a very “unique with 12-foot travel lanes except for its intersections have a traffic signal. There is a traffic signal located place” by Native Americans and early European with New York State Route 31 (where there are at the intersection of County Route 57 with NYS settlers. Undoubtedly, with its natural beauty and as many as seven lanes) and County Route 57A Route 31 with designated turning lanes. All four easy access, Three Rivers Point has long been a destination for many who live in the region. Archeological investigations indicate evidence of Native American settlements and encampments along the rivers at Three Rivers Point, which is considered a place of historic significance to Native Americans. This location is thought to have been a regular meeting place for members of the Confederacy prior to the late 1790s. Apparently the first European American settler in the Town of Clay also took up residence at Three Rivers Point in 1793 (www.townofclay.org).

Around 1871, the Syracuse Northern Railroad installed railroad tracks from Syracuse to Oswego, Page | 14 crossing the Oneida River at Three Rivers Point. uses that emerged in the Study Area were two featuring talented screen and stage artists. Three Those railroad tracks, which run parallel to County petroleum product storage facilities (one of which Rivers Inn burned down in 1973 and was the last Route 57, are currently owned and operated by is the former Cibro site). These were located commercial business at Three Rivers Point. CSX Rail, and include a north-south route linking along Maider Road east of Three Rivers Point. A rail yards in Syracuse with Phoenix, Fulton and third bulk petroleum storage facility was located 3.3 Physical Site Conditions Oswego. At the present time, passenger service on Gaskin Road (see Brownfield Opportunity is not provided along this rail line. There is a rail Area Program Application, 2009). These facilities The primary Study Area located in the Town of Clay siding on this line near the County Route 57 and originally transported materials by barge, but later consists of approximately 85 acres, the majority Maider Road intersection. began using train transportation as well as other of which is Town-owned property. Other parcels in overland transportation options. All three facilities the primary Study Area are either privately owned Decades later, Three Rivers Point was a significant were closed by the mid 1990’s (see Brownfield or owned by the New York State Canal Corporation site on the New York State Barge Canal, which Opportunity Area Program Application, 2009). (see Figure 8). Active land uses include single- opened in 1918. At Three Rivers Point, westbound Currently, recreational boaters are the primary family residential development, Northern Ready travel on the Oneida River could proceed north users of the canal system. Mix, an industrial cement plant, and the / along the Oswego River to Phoenix, Fulton, Atlantic Richfield property, which is currently Oswego and ultimately to Lake Ontario or turn The Three Rivers Inn, which was an entertainment storing hazardous materials. The remaining land, south into the Seneca River to Baldwinsville and nightclub and hotel, was formerly located at approximately 71 acres, has been unused for over points west. While the Barge Canal was used for Three Rivers Point. The Inn was a destination a decade. The unused parcels consist of former commercial purposes, the only historic commercial entertainment club with a regional reputation, commercial, residential and industrial land.

Former Three Rivers Inn site.

Page | 15 East of County Route 57 along Maider Road is owned parcels and the privately owned industrial to steep grades along the river edge and the a block of five single-family residential parcels, sites in the Study Area to Planned Development embankment of County Route 57. Panoramic all of which are included in the R-10 One Family District (PDD) (see Figure 8). The privately owned views over the confluence of the Oswego, Seneca Residential District (the R-10 designation indicates residential properties remain in the R-10 One and Oneida Rivers are a beautiful natural amenity. that minimum parcel size is 10,000 square feet). Family Residential District (see Figure 8). Currently this area is vacant and underutilized. Field The nearest commercial land uses are 1.7 miles investigations indicate that sites along the shoreline County Route 57 and the CSX rail line cut the Study to the south along NYS Route 31 and 2.4 miles adjacent to the County Route 57 Bridge abutments, Area into two sections. The western section includes to the north in the Village of Phoenix. Across are popular fishing locations (see Figure 9). the Seneca River, in the Town of Lysander, is the the former Three Rivers Inn and the eastern section Radisson River Park owned by the Empire State includes the former Cibro site. At the former Three Vehicular and pedestrian access to the site is from Development Corporation. Currently the park Rivers Inn site, the area is primarily a patchwork County Route 57 and Gaskin Road, a two-lane includes a boat launch and there are plans for of gravel/asphalt with a few large swaths of grass local road. Gaskin Road provides a direct and picnic areas and boat storage. Immediately north growing through it. Some large specimen trees immediate connection to the adjacent residential of the Study Area, the dominant land use along the exist, scattered along the outer fringes. The site is neighborhood to the south. An informal but well river’s edge is residential development within the devoid of any buildings or structures aside from a traveled dirt path exists under the County Route 57 Town of Schroeppel. seawall along the river’s edge, which is owned by Bridge, adjacent to the abutments. This footpath the New York State Canal Corporation. links the western and eastern sections of the Study With the goal of encouraging redevelopment, Area. the Town of Clay recently rezoned the town- Topography is primarily flat with the only moderate

View of fishermen at Three Rivers Point. Informal footpath under County Route 57 bridge.

Page | 16 East of the County Route 57 embankment and west bridge support structures and rail line utilities. This East and south of the single-family homes is a of the CSX rail line embankment is a triangular intersection is very challenging for vehicular as brownfield site, which was formally occupied by low-lying depression filled with common reed and well as pedestrian traffic due to the steep incline the Cibro petroleum bulk storage facility for fuel successional scrub-shrub vegetation. This area and poor sight distance. According to an Onondaga oil and asphalt. The former Cibro asphalt plant is appears to inadvertently function as a storm water County Department of Transportation study, sight a 66-acre site located off of Maider Road. When collection area. distance is 360 feet to the left and 320 feet to the operational, there were waterfront docks on the right. For an entrance road with a 40-mile per hour Oneida River for unloading petroleum products. Immediately to the east of the CSX rail line is a speed limit, sight distance should be 445 feet in As stated in the Town of Clay’s 2009 Brownfield linear woodlot, which provides a visual buffer for both directions. Potential future realignment of Opportunity Area Program Application, this site the adjacent cluster of single-family homes. This Maider Road should be considered to correct is currently being investigated for water and soil woodlot, in conjunction with the CSX rail line and this issue (see Section 9.1 herein). On the north contamination. County Route 57 embankments, block any visual side of Maider Road across the roadway from the or physical connectivity between these homes Another brownfield site located in the Study Area, single-family homes, is a very steep embankment and the Study Area. Maider Road, a two-lane on the north side of Maider Road, across from the that leads down to the river’s edge. Residents paved local road, is the only formal vehicular and former Cibro facility, is a former Atlantic Refining have constructed decks and stairs down the pedestrian connection between County Route 57 Company Asphalt Terminal. Contamination embankment to provide waterfront access from and points east along the Oneida River within the investigations are currently underway on this Maider Road. Further east along the river’s edge Study Area. The County Route 57 and Maider Road site. Future redevelopment options are clearly the embankment becomes less steep. intersection has inadequate sight distance due to contingent upon the success of brownfield

View of structures on former Cibro brownfield site.

Page | 17 mitigation and clean-up efforts. Currently there are (see Figure 11). The lands along County Route 57 3.4 County Route 57 Transportation Corridor numerous derelict buildings, foundations, pipes, are zoned Industrial and those along the shoreline As previously described, this Access Study includes and tanks on site. Further east along Maider Road are zoned R-1 Residential. All of the developed County Route 57 from NYS Route 31 north to are additional woodlots with mixed successional land is active and the uses include single family County Route 57A. For the last two decades, vegetation. Within these woodlots are old rail lines residential homes along the southern shoreline of while commercial development has increased that formerly served the industrial uses in this area, the Oswego and Oneida Rivers and commercial rapidly along Route 31 causing an increase in as well as additional petroleum product storage development along Hoag Drive (see Figure 10). traffic along County Route 57, the Study Area has tanks and pipes connecting to the Oneida River. The businesses include a distribution warehouse been underutilized and thus generated minimal and a carwash. The residential land uses include The Study Area located in the Town of Schroeppel traffic. With the prospects of redevelopment, this single-family homes and cottages. Much of the includes the Oneida River shoreline north to Hoag situation could quickly change. For purposes of undeveloped land is in the flood plain and includes Road and from the Oswego River shoreline east to understanding the potential traffic impacts from significantly wet areas. All of the land in this area is the Oneida River. Route 57 and the CSX rail line redevelopment, the existing traffic conditions on either privately owned or owned by the New York run north through the area (see Figure 10). This County Route 57 and at the four intersections along State Canal Corporation (see Figure 11). area is semi-rural in character and relatively flat the corridor must be understood (see Figure 1). with stunning views at the confluence of the three Traffic counts were performed in 2005 and again in rivers. The flood plain, which covers the southern 2009. Based on these data, total weekday morning portion of the peninsula and wetlands along or near and afternoon peak hour and Saturday midday the shoreline, constrain future land use options peak hour traffic volumes for the four intersections

View of docks on Oneida River.

Page | 18 included in this Access Study are shown in Table 2.

The traffic volume at the signalized intersection of Routes 57 and 31 has increased over the last five years, with the most significant increase (21%) documented during the Saturday midday peak hour (see Table 2). Based on the 2009/2010 data, the three unsignalized intersections operate at Level of Service A, which in practical terms means the traffic flows smoothly with minimal interruptions at the intersections. The signalized intersection at Routes 57 and 31 poses the most significant constraint on travel through the area because it is the busiest of the Study Area intersections. Approximately half of the traffic volume at this intersection is through traffic on NYS Route 31.

Table 2. Total Traffic Volume 2005, 2009/2010

Saturday AM Peak Volume PM Peak Volume Volume Intersection Change Change Midday Peak Change 2005 2009 2005 2009 2005 2010 County Route 57 at 1,642 1,806 9.98% 3,428 3,377 -1.48% 2,801 3,387 20.92% Route 31 County Route 57 at n/a 306 n/a n/a 633 n/a n/a 667 n/a Verplank Road County Route 57 at n/a 316 n/a n/a 612 n/a n/a 606 n/a Maider Road County Route 57 at n/a 412 n/a n/a 803 n/a n/a 717 n/a County Road 57A 2005 study conducted by FRA Engineering, P.C.; 2009/2010 traffic data from SMTC.

Page | 19 4.0 STUDY AREA ASSESSMENT

4.1 Opportunities and Constraints The following potential opportunities and possible Point should be developed as a destina- constraints for the Town of Clay portion of the Study tion attraction accessible by both land and The Study Area is ripe for redevelopment and rich Area should be considered when redeveloping this water. with potential. Although some former land uses area (see Figure 9): 4. Enhance pedestrian connectivity by have left an imprint, which must be cleaned up, connecting adjacent waterfront develop- the opportunities for capturing the natural beauty Opportunities: of the area and celebrating the rich history unique 1. Develop a Riverwalk, which is sensitively ments and existing neighborhoods, specif- to this site are significant. The challenge is to designed to recognize the Native American ically linking Three Rivers Point, Gaskin identify a balanced mix of uses in a physical form Heritage at Three Rivers Point as well as Road and Maider Road using pedestrian that respects the site’s natural, cultural and scenic contribute to the revitalization of a strate- walkways and limited access roadways. resources with a density that is economically gic waterfront. 5. Capture the scenic views. Moderate grades sustainable by the regional community. Critical 2. Encourage recognition of the site as the at the shoreline permit water-related devel- consideration of the opportunities and constraints location of a former world-class entertain- opment with panoramic views. listed below and the traffic analysis of County Route ment nightclub and destination hotel. 6. Improve the railroad crossing at Maider 57 will help develop a firm foundation upon which 3. Encourage waterfront development with a Road. Relocating Maider Road south to strategic decisions regarding future redevelopment mix of residential, retail, office space and maximize usable land with access to water can be based (see Figures 9 & 11). public open space to promote a “water- could alleviate steep road incline and poor front village” atmosphere. Three Rivers sight distance.

Identified area of opportunity at Three Rivers Point.

Page | 20 Constraints: line may limit waterfront accessibility. Opportunities: 1. The higher elevation of County Route 5. The low-lying depression between County 1. Lands outside the floodplain along the 57 and the CSX rail line create a visual Route 57 and the CSX rail line is currently Oswego shoreline are easily accessible and physical barrier to connecting Three land locked and inaccessible. from County Route 57 and could provide Rivers Point and Maider Road. 6. Future development options are contin- water frontage and unique views. 2. County Route 57’s status as a busy arte- gent upon the success of brownfield miti- 2. Hoag Drive provides access from Route 57 rial roadway presents a potential challenge gation and clean-up efforts. to the eastern shoreline of Oneida River. to development proposals spanning this 7. The lack of municipal sewer and water 3. The upland areas are developable for recre- route at Three Rivers Point. Simultaneous- service could limit the type and density of ational or residential uses with access to ly, the CSX rail line crossing at Maider Road redevelopment allowed (see Appendix E). Oneida River. will need to be taken into consideration 4. An existing private drive along the south- In light of its rural character combined with when designing a pedestrian link between ern shoreline of the Oneida River provides environmental and land ownership constraints, adjacent waterfront developments. an opportunity for access to the Oneida development opportunities in the Town of 3. The present location of Maider Road may Schroeppel Study Area are minimal, but unique River without crossing wetlands. limit waterfront access and future devel- (see Figure 11). The following opportunities and Constraints: opment along the river’s edge. possible constraints should be considered when 1. A significant portion of the Oneida River 4. Steep banks along the Oneida River shore- developing this area. Shoreline is in the Floodplain and thus

Example of informal waterway recreational and/or transportation usage at Three Rivers Point.

Page | 21 undevelopable. However, this area could vehicular connections between the south- experienced by drivers at an intersection. Control be used for seasonal recreational trails. ern waterfronts and lands east of County delay is the time that a driver spends decelerating, 2. The CSX rail line bisects this area, dras- Route 57 is constrained by ownership. stopped, moving up in queue, and accelerating as a tically limiting access to the majority of result of a traffic signal or stop sign. A letter grade lands east of the railroad. Additionally, – called a level of service (LOS) – is assigned to 4.2 County Route 57 Corridor uses between County Route 57 and the rail individual movements and/or a whole intersection based on the average control delay. There are six line would require significant buffering of 4.2.1 Current Capacity Analysis possible levels of service, from LOS A to LOS F, noise and other related impacts. A capacity analysis was conducted at each of the and each level of service corresponds to a range 3. The New York State Canal Corporation study corridor intersections. Intersection capacity of delay values. LOS A represents ideal conditions owns the lands with the prime views at the analysis compares the actual volume of traffic at an with minimal delay to travelers. LOS F indicates that confluence of the three rivers, thus, limit- intersection to the maximum volume of traffic that excessive delay is experienced at an intersection. ing redevelopment options. can pass through an intersection within a specified Generally, LOS D is considered the minimum 4. The incompatibility of industrial and resi- period of time (typically one hour) based on factors acceptable level of service. Detailed parameters dential uses may cause constraints on such as the number of travel lanes and the type for LOS for both signalized and unsignalized lands neighboring the existing light indus- of traffic control in place (such as a stop sign or intersections are shown in Tables 3a and 3b. trial use. a traffic signal). Capacity analysis procedures are Traffic operations in the Study Area were evaluated 5. The potential to enhance pedestrian and used to calculate the amount of “control delay” based on LOS changes, if any. In 2005 the Route

Table 3a Signalized Intersections Level of Service Table 3b Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Level of Service Average Control Delay (seconds/vehicle) Level of Service Average Control Delay (seconds/vehicle) A 0 -1 0.0 A 0 -1 0.0 B > 10.0 – 20.0 B > 10.0 – 15.0 C > 20.0 – 35.0 C > 15.0 – 25.0 D > 35.0 – 55.0 D > 25.0 – 35.0 E > 55.0 – 80.0 E > 35.0 – 50.0 F > 80.0 F > 50.0

Page | 22 57/31 intersection operated at LOS B during the completion of both development concepts in the (see Appendix C). The expected traffic volumes weekday morning peak hour and LOS C during year 2020. The future No-Build scenario represents from the office and retail space were distributed both the weekday evening peak hour and Saturday the 2020 conditions at the Study Area intersections, throughout the corridor and included in the future midday peak hour. By 2009 traffic volumes without additional development in the primary No-Build analysis. Using these data, traffic volumes increased, degrading the LOS for all peak hours area. No-Build conditions include background were calculated for the year 2020. The intersection to D (see Table 4). This indicates that delay over traffic growth in the vicinity of the Study Area due geometry and signal timings were assumed to the years has been steadily increasing. Turning to local and regional development. A background remain unchanged from the 2010 conditions. movements and traffic volumes are illustrated in growth rate of 1.5 percent per year was applied The capacity analysis for the 2020 No-Build Appendix B. to the traffic volumes of the study intersections, conditions indicates that the three unsignalized based on recent trends in population growth. In intersections will continue to operate at LOS A. The 4.2.2 Future No-Build Conditions addition, traffic volumes were generated using signalized intersection at Routes 57 and 31 will the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip An analysis of future traffic conditions without experience a degradation of LOS for the weekday Generation Manual, 8th Edition (ITE, 2008), for the consideration of redevelopment of the Study evening and Saturday peak hours. During the anticipated development of 200,000 square feet of Area serves as a baseline measurement, against Saturday peak hour, two approaches, northbound new office space along NYS Route 31 and 100,000 which impacts to the roadway network from future and eastbound, will operate at LOS F (see Table 5 square feet of specialized retail space over the next redevelopment scenarios are compared. This is and Appendix C). ten years (based on information from the Town the 2020 No-Build Conditions. “Future” for the of Clay’s Planning and Development Department) purpose of this Access Study refers to the expected The increase in traffic volume over the next 10

Table 4. Summary of Intersection Level of Service 2005 & 2009/2010

AM Peak * PM Peak * SAT Midday Peak* Intersection 2005 2009 2005 2009 2005 2010 County Route 57 at Route 31 B (19.8) D (37.1) C (32.1) D (39.0) C (28.6) D (52.1) County Route 57 at Verplank Road n/a A (1.6) n/a A (2.1) n/a A (1.8) County Route 57 at Maider Road n/a A (1.3) n/a A (1.1) n/a A (0.6) County Route 57 at County Road n/a A (3.9) n/a A (5.5) n/a A (3.1) 57A Vehicles at stop sign along Verplank Road. *Level of Service followed by HCM Average Control Delay (seconds/vehicle) stated in parentheses. 2005 study conducted by FRA Engineering, P.C., only includes County Route 57/Route 31 intersection. Page | 23 years, whether under the No-Build condition or either of the two alternative development concepts, will not have an impact on the three unsignalized intersections along County Route 57. However, the intersection of County Route 57 and Route 31 will experience degradation in LOS, under the No-Build condition, which may require some mitigation at the intersection. Phasing of the traffic signal may need to be adjusted to accommodate the changes in traffic patterns. (The traffic analysis prepared for the draft alternative concepts assumes that adjustments to signal timing have been made.)

Table 5. 2009/2010 & 2020 Future No-Build Level of Service

AM Peak * PM Peak * SAT Midday Peak* Intersection 2009 2020 2009 2020 2010 2020

County Route 57 at Route 31 D (37.1) D (41.2) D (39.0) E (66.5) D (52.1) E (76.2)

County Route 57 at Verplank Road A (1.6) A (1.6) A (2.1) A (2.4) A (1.8) A (2.0)

County Route 57 at Maider Road A (1.3) A (1.3) A (1.1) A (1.2) A (0.6) A (0.6)

County Route 57 at County Road 57A A (3.9) A (4.0) A (5.5) A (7.7) A (3.1) A (3.5)

*Level of Service followed by HCM Average Control Delay (seconds/vehicle) stated in parentheses. 2009/2010 traffic data from SMTC.

Page | 24 5.0 REDEVELOPMENT AND LAND USE CONCEPTS

5.1 Redevelopment Vision and Goals Mindful of the Town’s vision for this area, as and wetlands. To that end, the focus behind the reflected in its Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan Land Use Plan, which was developed for this The purpose of this study is to understand the and Northern Land Use Plan, the two alternative Access Study, is to minimize potential impacts to potential traffic impacts from redevelopment redevelopment concepts include a mix of land uses natural resources by proposing low intensity uses of the Study Area. To achieve this, alternative at a scale that is sensitive to the Study Area’s context for the eastern portion of the area where wetlands development concepts were created to reflect the (see Figures 12 and 14). The overarching design and floodplain zones converge. The proposed Land goals stated in the relevant plans for the Towns intent is to enhance and celebrate the local and Use Plan includes land uses compatible with the of Clay and Schroeppel. Redevelopment of Three regional heritage at Three Rivers Point, embrace existing riverine community along the southern Rivers Point as a hamlet center with a mixture the waterfront for community use and enjoyment, shoreline (see Figure 15). of uses that service new and existing residential integrate respectfully with the natural environment, neighborhoods is recommended in all of the Town In keeping with the vision of both towns, the goals and create a neo-traditional neighborhood with a of Clay’s recent planning studies. The anticipated for redevelopment of the Study Area are: healthy mix of uses. redevelopment uses include residential, retail 1. Provide public access to the waterfront. commercial, professional office, entertainment, and Future land uses in the Schroeppel portion of the 2. Protect natural resources of significance. recreational. Of equal importance is the protection Study Area were selected based on environmental 3. Establish pedestrian connections through- and celebration of the natural, scenic, and historic conditions, rural character, and availability of out the new development and to the exist- resources in the Study Area. Opening up the infrastructure (sewer and water). The Town ing neighborhoods. of Schroeppel’s existing Comprehensive Plan waterfront for community access and recreational 4. Include a sustainable mixture of residen- enjoyment has been of interest for many years. emphasizes the need to protect riparian resources

View along Maider Road of docks in Oneida River.

Page | 25 tial, commercial, professional office and access to the hamlet center, avoiding the need while picnicing or participating in other passive entertainment uses. to travel on Route 57. To the east of Route 57, a recreation. The other main attraction is a modestly 5. Protect Three Rivers Point as a place of hamlet-style residential neighborhood is laid out sized (15,000 square feet) entertainment center significance to the Onondaga Nation. with the streets in a grid pattern. This development and hotel reminiscent of the Three Rivers Inn, but 6. Protect and enhance views of the three pattern is not expected to continue beyond this at a contemporary scale. Located east of Route rivers. complex. Water-related recreation is supported 57, the entertainment center can also serve as a along Oneida River with the addition of a marina community center for local residents. It is centrally (off of Bonstead Road), docks, and fishing access aligned with the main pedestrian axis from the 5.2 Redevelopment Concepts (at Three Rivers Point). As illustrated in Figure 12, entertainment center to the fishing pier and pedestrian connections to future conservation or riverwalk along the Oneida River. A small cluster 5.2.1 Concept Alternative 1 cluster residential developments south of this of mixed-use buildings line this route, providing Redevelopment Concept Plan Alternative 1 site will be encouraged to foster connectivity a modest node of commercial, professional, and (Concept Alternative 1) showcases a small hamlet while protecting additional open space. This is in recreational activity. Maider Road is realigned center located west of Route 57, near Three Rivers keeping with the Town’s objectives as stated in the and serves as the main spine for this mixed-use Point (see Figure 12). This hamlet center includes Draft Northern Land Use Plan, and highlights the neighborhood. Townhouses add diversity to the one-story retail-commercial, two-story mixed- distinct character, scale, and waterfront focus of single-family residential units in the neighborhood. use with commercial and residential, town house this complex. In summary, Concept Alternative Residential land uses are buffered from the clusters, and two story apartments. The hamlet 1 proposes a combination of 86 townhomes, 48 entertainment center by a water feature. Additional center opens up to a community green at the tip apartments, 60 single-family homes, a marina with single-family housing is provided along Route 57. of Three Rivers Point. This preserves the site as boat storage, and over 25,000 square feet of retail An active trail system is laced throughout, allowing an important civic space inviting all visitors to commercial space. for safe and convenient walking, biking, cross- the water’s edge. Scenic views across all three country skiing and snowshoeing. In summary, 5.2.2 Concept Alternative 2 rivers can be enjoyed during all seasons. Safe Concept Alternative 2 proposes a combination of 34 townhomes, 8 apartments, 33 single-family and convenient pedestrian access throughout The Redevelopment Concept Plan Alternative 2 homes, a marina with boat storage, and over 28,000 the complex is provided with connections to the (Concept Alternative 2) showcases the historic, square feet of retail commercial space including a proposed trail system along the Oneida River and scenic, and natural significance of Three Rivers 15,000 square foot entertainment center. residential greenway. When fully developed, the Point by dedicating the Point as a community hamlet center will provide convenient services for park with interpretive signage, recreational trails, the new and existing residential neighborhoods. and waterfront access for birding, fishing and With a direct connection to Gaskin Road, local boating (see Figure 14). Visitors can enjoy the residents have convenient walking and biking scenic views at the confluence of the three rivers Page | 26 5.2.3 Land Use Plan its semi-rural character and take advantage of the is an appropriate use of this wooded area, and water frontage that is accessible. The proposed would serve as an ideal neighboring land use to The Land Use Concept Plan (Land Use Plan) Land Use Plan includes residential town homes the adjacent light industrial area if provided with for the portion of the Study Area in the Town of and a low-impact park, featuring nature trails and an adequate naturalized buffer. In keeping with Schroeppel balances protection of environmental campsites along the Oneida River waterfront (see the Town of Schroeppel’s development goals, resources with development (see Figure 15). The Figure 15). The land outside the floodplain along the commercial uses along the Route 57 corridor are opportunity to enhance and promote the physical Oswego River shoreline is easily accessible from discouraged to avoid corridor sprawl, minimize relationship of the Study Area between the Towns County Route 57 and could provide water frontage dilution of the commercial area to the north, and of Schroeppel and Clay across the Oneida River and unique views to residential owners. If the protect environmental integrity of the low lying wet is complicated by three factors: land ownership, opportunity arises, development of a trail system areas and forest. Commercial and light industrial public access, and topography (see Figure 11). that connects the residential uses west of Route 57 uses, if any, should be located off of Hoag Drive The riverfront in the Town of Schroeppel is owned to the southern shoreline would add recreational north of the flood plain, where such uses currently by the New York State Canal Corporation and value to the area. Additionally, a nature trail exist. lined with privately owned waterfront cottages, throughout the park would connect the campsites limiting public access to the water. The remaining to a boat launch and docks on the shore of the 5.2.4 Summary shoreline is privately owned, and the eastern Oneida River, providing overnight camping options shoreline is essentially low-lying and in the flood Both Concept Alternatives and the Land Use for boaters and recreational opportunities for plain. The focus for the Town of Schroeppel Study Plan meet the many development policies and residents. The low impact park and campgrounds Area is to encourage land uses that complement objectives as stated in the Town of Clay’s LWRP and Northern Land Use Plan and the Town of Schroeppel’s Comprehensive Plan. Concept Alternatives 1 and 2 include a few similar features such as a marina, improved public access to the river’s edge, a recreational trail system, a diverse mix of uses (commercial, residential, professional, and civic recreational), improvements to the Maider Road intersection, and an improved storm water management system, which is incorporated as a water feature. The primary difference between these Concept Alternatives is their central

View of waterfront cottages in Town of Schroeppel across the water at Three Rivers Point. organizing feature. Concept Alternative 1 proposes a mixed-use hamlet center near Three Rivers Page | 27 Point, while Concept Alternative 2 proposes an hotel/entertainment center on the eastern side of Route 57, at the location of the existing brownfield. Aside from the obvious difference in use-type and form, the other distinguishing difference is the type of traffic generated, which is discussed in detail in Section 7. In both concepts the existing homes on Maider Road are maintained as is, and Maider Road is realigned to intersect with Route 57 approximately 640 feet south of the Route 57 Bridge. This will improve vehicular circulation and safety without compromising local access.

Opportunities to generate a synergistic spatial relationship at Three Rivers Point and along the Oneida River can be met with strategic coordination This space left intentionally blank. between the two towns and New York State Canal Corporation. The Land Use Plan proposes uses with minimal impact on existing environmental conditions and which directly complement what is proposed in the Town of Clay. Impacts associated with the Land Use Plan are minimal, other than a possible slight increase in traffic during the boating season due to a probable increase in campers.

Page | 28 6.0 PUBLIC INPUT

The community was given an opportunity to review heritage, as well as the scenic views and natural hamlet center at Three Rivers Point to provide a and comment on the two preliminary Concept beauty in the area. Storm water management larger civic space allowing the community access Alternatives (see Figures 12 & 13) at a public was mentioned as a concern, which warrants to the waterfront at Three Rivers Point. A second informational meeting on November 17, 2010. extra attention with any new development, as public meeting was held on June 29, 2011 to review After an introductory presentation of the purpose many existing properties currently experience wet and discuss the conclusions from the traffic model. of this study, a review of the existing conditions, conditions during the rainy season or heavy storm During that meeting, it was emphasized that the and a description of the alternative concepts, the events. A full summary of public comments is Concept Alternatives are hypothetical and intended audience broke out into two small groups to review provided in Appendix E. The SAC met on December to simply illustrate the potential capacity of the and discuss each concept. After approximately 20, 2010 to review and discuss the preliminary existing transportation system. In summary, the thirty minutes, the two groups reconvened to Concept Alternatives in light of the community’s community supports public waterfront access and share comments and answer additional questions. input. In response to the community’s interest a balance of mixed-use development (commercial Although some residents do not want additional in preserving the natural setting at Three Rivers and residential) with cultural and natural resource development at Three Rivers Point, others support Point, the SAC modified Concept Alternative 2 by preservation and recreational trails. Concerns redevelopment. Some local residents prefer that enlarging the civic space at Three Rivers Point regarding traffic impacts generated from This space left intentionally blank. Gaskin Road serve local traffic only, and suggest (see Figure 14). This modified version of Concept redevelopment were alleviated by the suggested that it be dead-ended when Three Rivers Point Alternative 2 was assessed (along with Concept mitigation measures (see Section 7.3). is redeveloped. There is strong support within Alternative 1) for potential traffic impacts. The the community to respect and preserve the local modification included removing the proposed

Page | 29 7.0 TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT FOR FUTURE ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTS

7.1 Traffic Assessment Method Trip Generation trips; in other words, pass-by trips were not included in the analysis. Pass-by trips are trips This traffic study of the Three Rivers Study Area Each of the Concept Alternatives includes a made to a site by traffic already “passing by” that includes analysis of the potential traffic impacts specified number of residential units by type site on an adjacent street and, if included in the of Concept Alternatives 1 and 2 and the Land Use (townhouse, apartment, and single family homes) analysis, would reduce the number of new trips Plan (Build Alternatives). The results are assessed and a total square footage of commercial space. In generated by the site. Excluding pass-by trips compared to the existing and future No-Build order to calculate the expected trip generation of from the analysis effectively results in a “worst volumes and levels of service (see Section 4; Table each hypothetical alternative (including the land use case” scenario. 5). The study focused on the following four key plan), the project team made some assumptions intersections: about the specific types of commercial uses Trip Distribution • County Route 57 / New York State Route 31 included in the total square footage. The traffic • County Route 57 / Verplank Road volumes generated by each Concept Alternative Existing traffic volumes along County Route 57 • County Route 57 / Maider Road were then established using the ITE Trip Generation and at the subject intersections were analyzed to determine the directional distribution at each • County Route 57 / County Route 57A Manual, 8th Edition. Table 7 identifies the land use assumptions, with the appropriate ITE land location. It was assumed that future directional use code, and Table 8 summarizes the total trip distribution would be similar to existing conditions. generation for each Build Alternative. Traffic models distributed estimated traffic volumes throughout the roadway network within All site-generated trips were assumed to be new the confines of the Study Area, which does not

Intersection of Maider Road and County Route 57.

Page | 30 include an analysis of roadways outside the Route southbound (exiting) the expected 2020 traffic volumes for each 57 corridor such as Interstate 481 or Route 31. • Saturday – 38% northbound/62% alternative concept. The level of service (LOS) southbound (entering) and 41% north- and delay results are summarized in Table 9. This For the development on the Schroeppel side, the bound/59% southbound (exiting) table includes previously mentioned values for the peak hour directional distributions along Route 57 existing and No-Build alternatives for comparison were calculated to be: Along Gaskin Road it was assumed that the traffic purposes. It should be noted that the existing • AM – 36% northbound/64% southbound that may use that roadway would originate only phase timings for the signal at the intersection • PM – 60% northbound/40% southbound from the development(s) on the west side of Route of Route 57 with Route 31 can be modified to • Saturday – 46% northbound/54% 57. In Concept Alternative 1 this would include improve the LOS and delay at this intersection. The southbound 28 townhomes, 2 mixed use buildings, and one existing conditions and No-Build Alternative with stand-alone 16 unit apartment complex. Concept revised timings are shown in this table. If signal For the remainder of the development along Route Alternative 2 included 6 single unit dwellings. timing is pursued, investigations would need to 57, the peak hour directional distributions along Under both Alternatives it was assumed that 95% be undertaken to determine if the timings at this Route 57 were calculated to be: would use Route 57 and 5% would use Gaskin signal are synchronized with other signals in the • AM – 48% northbound/52% southbound Road. These volumes are summarized in Appendix signal network. Under Concept Alternative 1, a (entering) and 30% northbound/70% G. new road is proposed as a part of the development. southbound (exiting) The analysis of its intersection with Route 57 is • PM – 34% northbound/66% southbound The site generated traffic volumes were added to the 2020 No-Build traffic volumes to determine provided in Table 9 as well. (entering) and 52% northbound/48%

Table 6. Additional Peak Hour Vehicles Using Gaskin Road

Most Likely Scenario Worst Case Scenario

West of East of TOTAL West of East of TOTAL CR 57 CR 57 CR 57 CR 57

Alternative 1 2 0 2 37 6 43

Alternative 2 0 0 0 6 5 11

Page | 31 Capacity Analysis for Concept Alternatives a 10%-90% split, where 10% of the traffic uses Gaskin Road. This additional traffic would create Maider Road/Bonstead Road and the remaining an increase of six vehicles during the peak hour, or In Concept Alternative 1, there are a few different 90% uses Route 57. one every 10 minutes. Under this scenario, a total land uses assumed on the west side of Route 57. of approximately 43 vehicles might utilize Gaskin These are town homes, an apartment complex, By comparison, although unlikely, if 100% of Road during the peak hour. Thus, the range of and two mixed-use buildings with apartments, a the traffic (local and visitors) generated by the potential increase in traffic might be as low as two hotel and a restaurant. The rational assumption proposed land use on the western side of Route vehicles or as high as 43 vehicles during the peak is that the majority of traffic generated would be 57 utilizes Gaskin Road, a total of 23 northbound hour (see Table 6). either commuter traffic or visitors (from out of vehicles and 14 southbound vehicles will travel on the area) traveling to the hotel or restaurant. With Gaskin Road during the peak hour, which equates Under Concept Alternative 2 (modified), there are that, it is assumed that 100% of the hotel visitors to approximately one vehicle every two minutes. only six single-family residential homes proposed and 95% of the other (local) vehicles will utilize With regard to the development proposed on the on the west side of Route 57, and similar to Concept Route 57, with 5% of local traffic utilizing Gaskin east side of Route 57, it is not likely that these Alternative 1, it is assumed only a small portion of Road. This results in a maximum of two vehicles vehicles will cross Route 57 to utilize Gaskin Road local vehicles will utilize Gaskin Road. Additionally, (one northbound and one southbound) utilizing as an alternate route to Route 57. However, in the the residential properties west of Route 57 are Gaskin Road during the peak hour (see Table 6). unlikely event that this does occur, it is reasonable assumed to have a 5%-95% split, where 5% Additionally, 100% of the hotel traffic west of to assume that only the traffic associated with the of this traffic will use Gaskin Road and 95% will Route 57 is assumed to use Route 57. The traffic apartment complex on the east side of Route 57, use County Route 57. Because so few homes generated east of the railroad is assumed to have heading to or coming from the south, would utilize are included on the west side of Route 57, no

Car crossing County Route 57 bridge. County Route 57 Bridge over Oneida River.

Page | 32 additional traffic along Gaskin Road is anticipated. Table 7. If all traffic generated by these six homes were to Land Use Assumptions For Traffic Analysis utilize Gaskin Road, it would amount to a modest increase of four northbound and two southbound Possible New Land Uses for Town of Clay vehicles, or roughly one vehicle every ten minutes. Concept Design Concept Design ITE Land Use Description (Code) In the unlikely event that vehicles from the east Alternative 1 Alternative 2 side of Route 57 choose to utilize Gaskin Road, Single Family Detached Housing 60 units 33 units it would likely be limited to the eight single family (210) homes along the roadway directly across from Apartment 48 total units 8 total units the development on the west side of Route 57. (220) Arguably the only vehicles that would utilize Gaskin Residential Condominium/Townhouse 134 units 82 units Road under this analysis would be those heading to (includes 48 in (includes 48 in (230) Schroeppel) Schroeppel) or coming from the south. This would add up to an Hotel additional five vehicles during the peak hour, or one 8 rooms 8 rooms (310) every 12 minutes. Additionally, the traffic east of Movie Theater without Matinee* 10,500 SF ball- County Route 57 is assumed to have a 10%-90% N/A room/concert (443) space split, where 10% of the traffic uses Maider Road/ General Office Building 11,410 SF office 7,800 SF office Bonstead Road and the remaining 90% would (includes 1,200 SF (includes 1,200 SF (710) marina office) marina office)

Convenience Market (Open 15-16 Hours) 2,500 SF N/A (852)

Copy Print and Express Ship Store 2,115 SF N/A (920) High Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant 5,000 SF 5,000 SF (932) Possible New Land Uses for Town of Schroeppel

Campground/Recreational Vehicle Park 15 campsite camp- 15 campsite camp- (416) ground ground Regional Park 25 acre park 25 acre park (417) *In some cases there was not an exact ITE match for the proposed use. In those situations a similar land use was utilized. Page | 33 use Route 57. As with Concept Alternative 1, it is future No-Build conditions as well as each of the Route 57 / Route 31 rational to assume that traffic from the eastern side Future Build conditions. No perceptible impacts to The traffic analysis shows that, in 2020, the County of County Route 57 would choose to use Route 57. either of these intersections are expected as a result Route 57/NY Route 31 intersection is expected to of either future development scenario included in operate at LOS E during weekday evening peak this study. 7.2 Potential Impacts hours and on Saturdays, regardless of whether or not the Study Area is redeveloped. The results of the traffic analysis show that the Route 57 / Maider Road redevelopment concepts developed for this Concept Alternative 1 would have no perceptible This result is partially based on an adjustment in the analysis would generate relatively minor increases impact on operations at the Maider Road / County current signal timing for Future Build Alternatives. in delay at the study intersections, as discussed Route 57 intersection. However, because Concept The signal timings at the County Route 57/Route 31 below. Alternative 2 includes a large entertainment/ intersection were adjusted in the model using the recreational use that would be a destination during optimization tools provided in Synchro as shown in Route 57 / Verplank Road and Route 57 / evening peak hours and on Saturdays, it would likely Table 8. This resulted in modest improvements in Route 57A result in a noticeable increase in delay at the Route 57 LOS and shorter delay values than were previously / Maider Road intersection. Saturday midday level reported. These signal timings were carried over The capacity analysis showed that these of service at this intersection would be expected to into the Build Alternatives. Since these timings vary intersections will continue to operate at LOS A degrade, from LOS A if no redevelopment occurs, slightly from the existing timings in the Synchro with minimal delay during all peak hours under the to LOS D under Concept Alternative 2. models, they must be approved by NYSDOT before

Table 8. Summary of Site Generated Volumes Alternative 1 AM Peak PM Peak SAT Peak 247 302 195 Alternative 2 AM Peak PM Peak SAT Peak 155 266 371

*These Site Benerated Volumes are a combination of entering and exiting volumes.

Page | 34 final implementation to ensure that this will not 7.3 Recommended Mitigation Measures A noticeable increase in traffic on Gaskin Road is impact other signals in the project vicinity that may extremely unlikely, but is possible. If more than the be coordinated with the Route 31 signal. As of this 7.3.1 Traffic Calming anticipated minimal increase in traffic along Gaskin writing, NYSDOT has indicated that signal timings Road does occur, an exploration of traffic calming Local residents voiced concerns about the potential are likely to be adjusted at this intersection in the elements, such as signage and speed bumps increase in traffic on Gaskin Road. To avoid any near future. could be undertaken, with improvements made as future increase in traffic on Gaskin Road, local necessary. Gaskin Road residents suggested creating a dead end at the northern end of the road. This extreme mitigation 7.3.2 Road Realignment The potential distribution of vehicles over local measure may not be necessary. The traffic model roadways, such as Route 57 and Gaskin Road, indicates that only a small increase in traffic is Of the known constraints in the Study Area, one of was based on rational assumptions informed by expected on Gaskin Road. As previously explained, the more challenging is the existing location of the standard traffic patterns. The rational assumption even with a higher percentage of traffic using Maider Road intersection with the CSX Rail line. for this Study Area is that the majority of vehicles Gaskin Road, there would be a minor to modest Successful redevelopment in this area will require will use Route 57 rather than Gaskin Road. See increase in the number of vehicles during peak a realignment of Maider Road. Each Concept Section 7.1 for a complete discussion of Gaskin hours. This suggests that closing the northern end Alternative includes relocating and realigning the Road trip distribution and potential traffic impacts. of the roadway is not warranted as a mitigation Maider Road intersection with the CSX Rail line and measure. County Route 57 to improve the existing situation.

View of Railroad Bridge from Bridge on County Route 57.

Page | 35 7.3.3 Potential for Passenger Rail Service likely be borne by some combination of a private based upon traffic patterns that naturally change developer, the municipalities involved and other over time. As such, optimized signal timing would Another known constraint in the Study Area is the public sources – not by CSX. Due to these mitigate impacts from future development. CSX rail line itself. One idea discussed over the past substantial barriers, passenger rail service is few years was to include passenger rail service to unlikely on this railroad line. 7.3.5 Turn Lane and Signal the Three Rivers area once it is redeveloped. After Concept Alternative 2, if built, could result in an discussing this possibility with the New York State 7.3.4 Signal Timings Department of Transportation it was determined improved level of service and reduced delay at that the successful development of rail passenger The traffic analysis indicates that signal timings Maider Road with the addition of a designated service on this line between Three Rivers and the at the County Route 57/NY Route 31 intersection left-turn lane at Maider Road for the westbound City of Syracuse would be unlikely. This rail line can be adjusted to reduce current delay times and direction; however, the delay experienced without is active and dedicated to freight service, which improve LOS. NYSDOT is analyzing these signal the turn lane is within acceptable limits during is not strategically connected to a schedule. Due timings and is developing a new signal timing plan the morning and evening peak hours. Under this to the importance of a schedule to passenger for this intersection regardless of whether or not scenario, the proposed entertainment center, which service, combining the two service-types on this either of the Build Alternatives is carried through. is located east of Route 57, would be the major one line presents logistical barriers. Additionally, Implementation of an optimized signal timing plan traffic generator, causing a direct impact on Maider construction of a new railroad siding and platform is assumed in the analysis of both 2020 Build Road. The delay at the Maider Road intersection would be required to accommodate passenger Alternatives since NYSDOT is likely to continually would only occur during isolated occasions, and service: the costs for these improvements would monitor their signals for optimal performance although a turn lane warrant analysis was not

Bridge Construction Traffic at Intersection of County Route 57 and Maider Road.

Page | 36 performed at this location, a westbound left turn lane was analyzed in the model. This analysis suggests a turn lane may be necessary to manage the increased traffic. According to Onondaga County Department of Transportation policy, if it is determined that a turn lane is warranted, the addition of a turn lane at a three-way intersection would also require a traffic signal. The installation of a traffic signal should be analyzed prior to implementation. The Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) outlines nine warrants for traffic signals that should be used as guidance. Additionally, if a signal is installed, a left turn lane may no longer be necessary for improved LOS and delay.

Page | 37 Table 9. Level of Service and Delay (in seconds)

AM* PM* Saturday*

Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour

Scenario/Location Rt. 31 Rt. 31 Rt. 31 CR 57A CR 57A CR 57A Maider Maider Maider Verplank Verplank Verplank New Road New Road New Road New

Existing D A A - A D A A - A D A A - A (2010) (37.1) (1.6) (1.3) (3.9) (39.0) (2.1) (1.1) (5.5) (52.1) (1.8) (0.6) (3.1) Existing C A A - A D A A - A D A A - A with new signal timings (2010) (23.8) (1.6) (1.3) (3.9) (36.6) (2.1) (1.1) (5.5) (40.7) (1.8) (0.6) (3.1)

No-Build Alternative D A A - A E A A - A E A A - A (2020) (41.2) (1.6) (1.3) (4.0) (66.5) (2.4) (1.2) (7.7) (76.2) (2.0) (0.6) (3.5) No-Build Alternative C A A - A E A A - A E A A - A with new signal timings (2020) (28.8) (1.6) (1.3) (4.0) (59.5) (2.4) (1.2) (7.7) (62.2) (2.0) (0.6) (3.5)

Build Alternative 1 C A A A A E A B A A E B B A A (2020) (30.4) (1.4) (3.1) (1.8) (3.7) (64.8) (2.6) (3.6) (1.2) (9.5) (65.1) (2.2) (1.6) (0.8) (3.7)

Build Alternative 2 D A A - A E A C - A E B D - A (2020) (39.6) (1.5) (3.2) (3.8) (62.8) (2.5) (4.6) (8.6) (67.2) (2.2) (9.2) (4.0) B u i l d A l te r n ati ve 2 - - A - - - - C - - - - C - - with westbound left turn lane at Maider Road (3.1) (4.2) (6.8) (2020) *Level of Service followed by HCM Average Control Delay (seconds/vehicle) stated in parentheses.

Page | 38 8.0 ASSESSMENT OF ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTS

The hypothetical Concept Alternatives were 8.1 Study Goal 1. redevelopment options that preserve and developed in light of each town’s future vision for Develop three alternative concepts that respect celebrate the site’s historic and cultural resources the Study Area and surrounding neighborhoods. natural resource protection, waterfront while creating and/or enhancing recreational The full implication of each Concept Alternative revitalization, and brownfield redevelopment opportunities that foster economic development can be assessed by determining how well each goals set forth in existing town plans. for the surrounding communities. The difference meets the goals of this Access Study. The concepts is how and to what extent. With a focus on assessed are Concept Alternative 1, Concept Natural resource protection, waterfront waterfront revitalization, each Concept Alternative Alternative 2, and the Land Use Plan (see Figures revitalization, and redevelopment of underutilized balances active waterfront access (private and 12, 14, and 15). This assessment will provide a brownfield properties represent the primary goals public) with natural resource protection. Both basis from which to assess the differences between set forth in the various planning studies reviewed Concepts include recreational activity along the each alternative, in comparison to the Study goals for this Access Study (see Section 2). The two Oneida River with a marina, boat launches and set forth in Section 1.1.2. Concept Alternatives and the Land Use Plan meet supporting retail businesses, such as a bait and these goals by addressing the reuse of the Cibra tackle shop. Both Concepts also support healthy brownfield site, encouraging public access to the reuse of the existing brownfield sites. However, shorelines of the Seneca and Oneida Rivers, and only Concept Alternative 2 promotes preservation providing a compatible mixture of uses in the Study of the historically important Three Rivers Point as Area, without overdeveloping the water’s edge. open space designed for recreational enjoyment (either passive or non-programmed active use). There is unanimous community support for

Intersection of CR 57 and Maider Road and the Railroad.

Page | 39 In Concept Alternative 1 mixed use development was included with both Concept Alternatives when Access Study. It is unknown how redevelopment is proposed for Three Rivers Point with the public analyzing traffic impacts (see Table 7). of any or all of the lands will impact the local waterfront reserved for civic use only, respecting transportation system. The Town of Clay should be Traffic volumes associated with Concept Alternative its cultural heritage. In each case, the goals mindful of preserving capacity at the intersection 1 are highest during weekday evening peak periods of protecting the natural, cultural and historic of Route 57 and 31 and should structure its zoning (see Table 7). Even with the potential increase resources of this site are met, but to different and land use regulations accordingly. in traffic, impacts to the Level of Service at each degrees and with different outcomes. studied intersection would be negligible. Under The redevelopment costs of the Study Area Waterfront revitalization and brownfieldConcept Alternative 2 (modified) higher traffic pursuant to each Concept Alternative are roughly redevelopment is central to each Concept volumes would be generated during Saturday the same. Environmental remediation will be a Alternative, although expressed differently. Also midday peak periods (11a.m.-1p.m.). Under this necessary expense regardless of end use for the central to each Concept is the incorporation of scenario impacts to the Level of Service may brownfield site. The same applies to expenses transportation systems that support healthy require the addition of a signal and turn lane at the associated with re-alignment of Maider Road, lifestyles. Although in different ways, each Concept County Route 57 / Maider Road intersection. which will be necessary regardless of the specific Alternative incorporates connectivity between redevelopment alternative. The Town of Clay Manageable traffic increase is only part of the trails, sidewalks and streets allowing for walking, should remain mindful of the probable need for final conclusion. It should be noted that there is running, biking, and cross country skiing. some roadway improvements and/or intersection additional undeveloped land between Route 31 improvements as a consequence of redevelopment and Three Rivers which was not factored into this of the Three Rivers Point. 8.2 Study Goal 2. Understand the potential traffic impacts generated from and relative costs associated with each Concept Alternative.

Once the Concept Alternatives were completed and traffic volumes generated per Concept Alternative were determined, the generated traffic volumes were put into the Synchro models and the impacts at each location were determined. Based on the results of the traffic assessment, the potential traffic impacts are minimal. As previously noted, Bridge Construction Traffic at Intersection of CR 57 and Maider Road. the Land Use Concept for the Town of Schroeppel

Page | 40 8.3 Study Goal 3. 8.4 Study Goal 4. Assess the potential for multi-modal Invite the community to review and discuss accessibility at Three Rivers Point. redevelopment options.

Multi-modal accessibility was considered for each This Access Study included two public redevelopment Concept Alternative. Circulation informational meetings. The first meeting engaged systems through the site accommodate walkers, the community to review and comment on two joggers, and bikers. Transportation to the site can preliminary Concept Alternatives. The second be achieved by car, bus, boat, or bike. In light of the meeting shared the results of the traffic analysis. existing Centro bus route which uses County Route Community support was similar for both Concept 57, bus turnouts are included in each Concept. Of Alternatives. Some community neighbors strongly initial interest was the potential for passenger rail prefer to live in a low density residential area. service, however, this service is unlikely due to Other community members simply want the local the current use of the rail line for freight service. roadways improved to better handle any increase Converting a freight line to a passenger line is in traffic volume due to general growth in the area/ highly unlikely due to the need for a passenger region (see Appendix E). schedule.

County Route 57 bridge over Three Rivers Point.

Page | 41 This page left intentionally blank.

Page | 42 9.0 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

Redevelopment and revitalization of the Study the town-owned parcels and the privately owned at Three Rivers Point. A conservation subdivision Area can be encouraged through effective land industrial sites in the Study Area to Planned or low density approach to residential development use regulations, appropriate regulatory permits/ Development District (PDD). The privately owned north of Verplank Road would be a compatible use approvals, and with infrastructure improvements, residential properties remain in the R-10 One Family and pattern of development. In the Northern Land some of which can be undertaken by the local Residential District (see Figure 8). The new zoning Use Study, it is suggested this area be zoned for municipality. An outcome of this Access Study regulations appear to encourage redevelopment of Residential land use with 10 acre lots or larger. is recognition by both towns that they can take the type proposed in both Concept Alternatives. It This type of low density development, especially strategic implementation steps that will encourage is recommended the Town Board review the PDD if structured in a conservation subdivision pattern, the type of redevelopment that best fits their requirements in light of this study to ensure that would also be compatible with a higher density vision for this Study Area. A few recommended they will effectively guide redevelopment in the mixed-use development within the Study Area. implementation strategies are discussed below. pattern and density preferred. Conservation subdivision would contribute to the conservation of meaningful open space and natural It must be noted that there is a lot of undeveloped resource protection. 9.1 Regulatory framework acreage between Route 31 and the Study Area. The town should proactively encourage preferred Town of Schroeppel. The Town of Schroeppel This page left intentionally blank. 9.1.1 Town zoning regulations land use patterns and density preferences for these Study Area includes lands along County Route lands. Future land uses and density will impact 57 which are zoned industrial and lands along the Town of Clay. With the goal of encouraging the transportation systems and if not carefully shoreline which are zoned R-1 Residential (see redevelopment, the Town of Clay recently rezoned managed, may negatively impact redevelopment Figure 10). Unfortunately, the proposed land uses

Three Rivers Point Recreational and Transportation Usage.

Page | 43 (high density townhomes and recreational use) are required will be determined once a development 9.2 Infrastructure Improvements not allowed under the current zoning districts. The plan is officially proposed. Although the Concept Alternatives are hypothetical, Town should review its future land use preferences • Town Clay (Site plan approval, subdivision some of the recommended improvements could for this area and revise its zoning regulations to approval, floodplain permit) be advanced by the local municipalities prior effectively promote the preferred land uses. • Town of Schroeppel (Site plan approval, to receiving private redevelopment proposals. subdivision approval, floodplain permit) 9.1.2 Permitting requirements These improvements include the development of • Onondaga County a public park and/or campground, a pedestrian Due to the nature of the Study Area and the fact that –– Department of Transportation trail (walking, running, biking, cross country much of the shoreline is owned by New York State –– Syracuse Onondaga County Planning skiing) along the Oneida and Seneca Rivers, Canal Corporation, any development within the Agency including a walkway under the County Route 57 Study Area will most likely require specific permits –– Department of Health and CSX Railroad bridges, and the installation of and/or approvals from the Town (Schroeppel or • New York State infrastructure for public water and sewer (where Clay), Onondaga County, New York State, and –– Department of Environmental Conservation possible). Such improvements will revitalize the the Federal Government. The following is a list of (Article 15, Protection of Waters Permit area from a public accessibility and enjoyment the local, state, and federal agencies from which Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan; aspect, which in turn may encourage the type permits or approvals will most likely be required Article 24, Freshwater Wetlands Section 401 of mixed-use redevelopment suggested in the prior to undertaking any redevelopment in the Water Quality Certification) Concept Alternatives. Study Area. The permits and/or approvals actually –– Department of Transportation Initial steps needed to advance changes to the –– Canal Corporation local transportation system include studying a –– Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Maider Road re-alignment and implementing Preservation signal timing adjustments at the State Route 31/ • Federal Government County Route 57 intersection. Maider Road at the –– United States Army Corps of Engineers intersections with the CSX Railroad and County (Section 404 of the Clean Water Act; Route 57 should also be reviewed and assessed Section 10 Navigable Waters) for improvement purposes. It was noted during –– National Oceanic and Atmospheric each public informational meeting that Maider Road at these two intersections is challenging Administration Marine Fisheries Service due to inadequate sight distance caused by the Permit bridge support structures and rail line utilities. Realignment of Maider Road would address

Page | 44 this issue which needs improving regardless of basis using knowledge of known contaminants 9.3 Potential Funding Sources whether the Study Area is redeveloped. However, present on site and the economic feasibility of Once the Towns of Clay and Schroeppel improvement of this intersection could help future reuse and redevelopment of that site determine which improvements to undertake, the may encourage redevelopment of the Study In summary, recommended improvements include: immediate next step is to decide how to fund such Area. The necessity of other noted intersection • Public park and/or campground improvements. Funding can come from private improvements such as adding a new turn lane and/or public sources. The Towns of Clay and and signal at the intersection of Maider Road and • Civic recreational park at Three River’s Schroeppel, with advance planning, could include Route 57 will depend on the actual redevelopment Point budget for the costs of such improvements. Another project. Undertaking such an improvement prior to • Riverside trails option is to seek grant funds for specific capital understanding how this area will be redeveloped is • Public sewer infrastructure improvement projects. Federal funding may be arguably premature. Addressing this issue at the • Signal timing adjustments at County available for the discussed roadway improvements time redevelopment is proposed will allow for the Route 57/31 through SMTC’s Transportation Improvement redesign of this intersection in a way that fits in • Study of the realignment of Maider Road Program. Other transportation fund sources with whatever development is proposed. • Open space/natural resource preservation that may be beneficial are the Transportation Undoubtedly, the brownfield sites in the Study Area Enhancements Program and Recreational Trails will need to be remediated and improved prior to Program. Existing funding sources are likely to being reused. The required degree of environmental change and new sources are likely to be created. remediation will be determined on a site-by-site Because there are too many unknowns about when, how, or who will instigate redevelopment of the Study Area, it will be necessary, when the time comes, to conduct timely research into an appropriate funding source. Currently, many of the funding sources focus attention on smart growth and sustainable communities. With the appropriate redevelopment plan, such sources may be a good match for funding assistance.

Beautiful July Day at Three Rivers Point overlooking the confluence of Oswego, Seneca, and Oneida Rivers.

Page | 45 SOURCES

• Brownfield Opportunity Area Program Application, 2009 • Draft Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan for the Town of Clay, April 2008 • FamousInterview.com, http://www.famousinterview.ca/interviews/lorraine_arsenault.htm • ITE Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition • New York State Erie Canal Recreationway Plan, 1995 • https://www.nysdot.gov/divisions/engineering/technical-services/highway-data-services/functional-class-maps/onondaga, file name “RegCo33_Onondage_County_2000_FC.pdf” • Route 31 & 57 Land Use and Circulation Study, 1999 • Route 31 & 57 Corridor Study, 2006 • Town of Clay Draft Northern Land Use Study, 2011 • Town of Clay Three Rivers Point Redevelopment Study, 2000 • Town of Schroeppel Comprehensive Plan, 2001 • http://www.townofclay.org/indexB.html • U.S. Census Bureau, www.census.org

Page | 46 FIGURES

Page | 47 Figure 1. Study Area

a 7 5 Intersection 4: Three Rivers CountyRoutes 57Route & CR 57 57A& County Road 57A Access Study

H

i l l t o on p Hilt Towns of Clay and Schroeppel, New York

ley nt Hu Figure 1:

Bonstead Study Area O s d w te w s e n g o o B R i March 2011 iv e r chm ren a 481 F n Ho Creek s ag n Notes: e y l e G b b re Base Map:One-foot A fe thsho reenlea Nor G J a orthoimagery, 2006.

c

k

s

o

n rr ee iviv RR aa Fa r idid ee H Reach nn id OO LEGEND L d a e S k n e ho h re Nort re t ho o S l Intersection 3: e c Study Intersection Intersection 3: M n aid a County Route 57 & er L Routes 57 & Maider Rd. Maider Maider Road d ir d C a a B A Primary Study Area e r d

g h b y o s n

e i

l

t r

r Pott

d er a

d

i D

F W Secondary Study s a k h n r B R w c d te t e Area e r a i

r v a in a n

H e

n g C W

r d e r r o t e t ci o G la w 57 G ge e e a d h t s Ri t a ly k G i B n re tu s F a ie B P E ld e n s e Of a d n v i le s

e b s e r I nk B in Verpla

r m o P o M W R

k u l i a a Intersection 2: T v i o m r t e Intersection 2: i

C c b n r h erl u

ea s F County Route 57 & o Routes 57 & Verplank Rd.

T x r R a f e i Verplank Road i l r n l e m ro P d w a be a g r O o Mi t C s

r e C t

o o o y l d v Cumberstone e S e H n ad d e ley o e o c P w C a r o r o u r R t t R t t t B e i a le R d iv l r r v i g e fo e e

e

n r

W r Grey s ta t C o S a Birch n rp e

n L t e i r g h t f J o a o yh t a in w lv k e M

G

a

s

g s

k n

d e i i n

o

k

a

d t

a o a n ind t Va L

r n

a w in e ele e l

D d L l n Wie a

e M

A r

g

W B n e i e P ri n n v a a to r r s o t r

u c e D h k o th r e o

a M N o le r d r b in o n C e W l l e c Gr e i een p M S Mdw Ho R ll id y S g 31 c e Intersection 1: B o Intersection 1: ro tc F o h y il E m rr a County Route 57 & G e r s b e l Deep e Routes 57 & 31 a 0p 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 idg e d r r i rt NYS Route 31 t Glade e Feet Pa www.edrcompanies.com Page | 48 SMTC - Three Rivers Access Study Towns of Clay and Schroeppel, New York Study Intersection

Figure 1. Study Area Primary Study Area March 2011 DRAFT Secondary Study Area Notes: Base Map: One-foot orthoimagery, 2006. www.edrcompanies.com Figure 2. Regional Context Map

Parish Amboy

3 Palermo Fulton Three Rivers L Fulton Volney LaakkeeNNea eattaahhwwan O OSWEGO anttaa Osw Hastings sw e Access Study e g Hannibal g COUNTY West Monroe o o

R R

i i v 264 v e e

r r Towns of Clay and Granby 48 Central Square Schroeppel, New York Schroeppel Sand Ridge 176 Constantia 481 49 ONEIDA Phoenix COUNTY Figure 2: Constantia Regional Context rr Brewerton ivivee On aaRR Oneeiidda L eeidid a Laakke Study Area OOnn e Lysander March 2011

Clay 31 Notes: 370 Cicero Baldwinsville 57 Base Map: ESRI r r ee v C ivi C r RR r StreetMap North o o s a a c ss c

s e

e L L n a n

a e e Village Green America, 2008. k Van Buren k e S S e Seneca North Syracuse Knolls MADISON 690 Liverpool 298 COUNTY O Salina n on nd Mattydale a g 90 Lakeland a L Galeville a kk e Lyncourt De Witt Minoa Jordan Geddes 173 East Syracuse Manlius Solvay Elbridge Camillus 290 e Syracuse nd LLaakke 5 Camillus Westvale 481 RRoouund Chittenango Elbridge Syracuse Fayetteville ONONDAGA 321 COUNTY Manlius 175

J Marcellus J R a R a 92 Nedrow m e e m

s s e e e e s CAYUGA r s r v v v v i o i o l l l i l e i r e C COUNTY r C a a z z k e Marcellus eeek e Onondaga r e n CCr n a o agga o d a v onnd v n o i n i O a O a

L Skaneateles L

a

a

k

k

e e Cazenovia Skaneateles Pompey 81 Melrose 91 Park 80 20

174 11A O O t t i i s s c LaFayette c o L S a Sk ke kan e Otisco nea ate tele les s L La ak O k O e

w w

a Spafford a

s s c c o o L L a 11 a k k e 41 e Fabius Tully

13 38 38A 41A

CORTLAND 281 COUNTY

er CCrreekk DDeecckker

0 1.25 2.5 Moravia5 7.5 10 Miles

SMTC - Three Rivers Access Study www.edrcompanies.com Towns of Clay and Schroeppel, New York Page | 49 Figure 2. Regional Context March 2011 DRAFT Notes: Base Map: ESRI StreetMap North America, 2008. www.edrcompanies.com Figure 3. Primary Study Area

SMTC - Three Rivers

SMTCThreeAccess - Three Rivers RiversStudy AccessAccess Study Study Towns Townsof Clay and of Clay and Schroeppel,TownsSchroeppel, of ClayNew andYork New York Schroeppel, New York Towns of Clay and Schroeppel, New York Hoag Figure 3. 481 Figure 3: PrimaryFigure Study 3: Area PrimaryPrimary Study Study Area Area March 2011

shore North March 2011

Notes: Base Map:One-foot d a e t orthoimagery, 2006. s n o B

ore sh h t

r

o N

Fa r Oswego River Re ach O O

s s

w w

e e

g g

o o 57

R R i ivv ee rr Sh or th e Nor re Sho Oneida River eerr Riviv a a R eeidid OOnn

R

i v e DRAFT r

Maider

r r

ee

vv i i

RR

a a cc

ee

nn

ee l

acie r SS i Gl a

Ridge R

C S X X

S Carter R March 2011

a C il

Notes: Notes: G Base Map: One-foot a Base Map: One-foot s orthoimagery, 2006 k

B Seneca River i n e orthoimagery, 2006

n

n

e

t

t

0 100 200 400 600 800 Feet

www.edrcompanies.com Page | 50 www.edrcompanies.com Figure 4. Study Areas - 2000 Three Rivers Study

Three Rivers Access Study

Towns of Clay and Schroeppel, New York

Figure 4: Study Areas - 2000 Three Rivers Study

LEGEND

Commercial

Residential

Parking

Public Open Spaces - paved Public Open Spaces - recreation Waterfront Activities

Trails - walking, biking, cross country skiing

www.edrcompanies.com Page | 51 Figure 5. Context - 2000 Three Rivers Study

Three Rivers Access Study

Towns of Clay and Schroeppel, New York

Figure 5: Context - 2000 Three Rivers Study

www.edrcompanies.com Page | 52 Figure 6. Character Studies - 2000 Three Rivers Study

Three Rivers Access Study

Towns of Clay and Schroeppel, New York

Figure 6: Character Studies - 2000 Three Rivers Study

www.edrcompanies.com

Page | 53 Figure 7. Plan/Land Use - 2000 Three Rivers Study

LEGEND Three Rivers Access Study Commercial Towns of Clay and Residential Schroeppel, New York

Parking Figure 7: Public Open Plan/Land Use - Spaces - paved 2000 Three Rivers Public Open Study Spaces - recreation Waterfront Activities Trails - walking, biking, cross country skiing

LEGEND

Commercial

Public Realm

High Density Housing/Mixed Use

Medium Density Housing

Low Density Housing

Public Open Space

www.edrcompanies.com

Page | 54 Figure 8. Zoning and Property Ownership, Town of Clay

SMTC - Three Rivers

SMTCThreeAccess - Three Rivers RiversStudy AccessAccess Study Study TownsSMTC of Clay- Three and Rivers N Towns of Clay and

o

r Schroeppel, AccessNew York Study t h TownsSchroeppel, of Clay and New York s d

h a N e Towns of Clay and o t o r s Schroeppel, New York

e r n Schroeppel, New York t o h B s d

h a e o t

r s e n o Figure 8. B Figure 8: Oswego River Zoning and Property O O Figure 8. s Zoning and s OwnershipFigure - 8: w w

e e Zoning and Property

g Ownership - Town g O Town of Clay O o Zoning and Ownership o s s Ownership - R w R w of Clay

e iiv e v g - Clay g Town of Clay e o rr o March 2011 R STATE R S i ho OF NEW iv re e LEGEND r YORK r e Oneida River March 2011 hor STATE Sh th S ore Nor OF NEW err Primary Study Area iivve YORK Primary Study re a RR PRIVATE Sho iidda Tax Parcel rth nnee OWNERSHIP Area No OO rr Primary Study Area ivvee RA 100 RRi PRIVATE idda a PRIVATE neei OWNERSHIP Tax ParcelTax Parcel OOn Maider OWNERSHIP Planned Dev. District RA 100 TOWN OF CLAY NEW YORK PRIVATE One Family Res. District 57 Planned Dev. District Maider OWNERSHIP NY State-OwnedRA 100 Property STATE OF PRIVATE TOWN OF CLAY NEW YORK One Family Res. District NEW YORK57 OWNERSHIP NY State-Owned Property TOWN OF CLAY Planned Dev. STATE OF PRIVATE PRIVATE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK OWNERSHIP OWNERSHIP District TOWN OF CLAY PRIVATE STATE OF NEW YORK OWNERSHIP One Family

r r TOWN OF CLAY Residential District e e v v i i STATE OF RR NEW YORK NY State-Owned r a a r TOWN OF CLAY TOWN OF CLAY NEW YORK c c e e e v v Property e i i TOWN STATE OF n n RR e e OF CLAY NEW YORK a C SS a S TOWN OF CLAY NEW YORK c c X e TOWN OF CLAY e R TOWN OF CLAY NEW YORK n TOWN a n il March 2011 e e DRAFT OF CLAY C Seneca River SS S X March 2011 TOWN OF CLAY R a TOWN OF CLAY NEW YORK il il a Notes:DRAFT

R

Notes: X Tax Parcel Data provided

S il Tax Parcel Data

a

C

R

providedby Town by Town of Clay; ownership

PRIVATE X

OWNERSHIP S of Clay;based ownership on best available data

C G based on best a PRIVATE from Canal Corporation and s k OWNERSHIP available data from i n Onondaga County records. G Canal Corporation

a s Notes:and DataOnondaga represented are r k e i n Tax Parcel Data provided by Town rt County records. a of Clay; ownershipintended based for on best presentation C availableData data represented Notes:from Canal r purposes only. e Corporation andTax Onondaga Parcel Data County provided by Town rt are inteded for a records. Data representedof Clay; ownership are based on best C Land Use Key intendedpresentation for presentationavailable purposes data purposes from Canal only. City/Town/Village Public Parks & Rec Areas only.BaseCorporation Map: and One-foot Onondaga County records. Data represented are CommercialLand Fuel Use Storage Key & Distribution Facilities Base Map:orthoimagery, One-footintended orthoimagery, for presentation 2006 purposes 2006 only. Industrial MiningCity/Town/Village and Quarrying Public Parks & Rec Areas Base Map: One-foot One Family Year-RoundCommercial Residence Fuel Storage & Distribution Facilities orthoimagery,Base Map: 2006. One-foot orthoimagery, 2006 Public TransportationIndustrial - Water Mining and Quarrying Residential Multi-Purpose/Multi-StructureOne Family Year-Round Residence Residential VacantPublic Land Transportation - Water Residential VacantResidential Land over Multi-Purpose/Multi-Structure 10 Acres Rural Vacant LotsResidential of 10 Acres Vacant or LessLand Vacant Land LocatedResidential in Commercial Vacant Land Areas over 10 Acres Vacant Land LocatedRural Vacant in Industrial Lots of Areas 10 Acres or Less

0 125 250 Vacant500 Land Located in Commercial750 Areas 1,000 Feet Vacant Land Located in Industrial Areas

0 125 250 500 750 1,000 www.edrcompanies.com Feet www.edrcompanies.com Page | 55 Figure 9. Opportunities & Constraints, Town of Clay

Three Rivers Access Study

Towns of Clay and Schroeppel, New York

Figure 9: 5. Opportunites and Constraints for the Town of Clay

4. 6. 4. 6. 3. 4. 1. 2. LEGEND

2. Opportunities 6. 5. 1. 3. Constraints 5. 1. FEMA Floodplain

NWI Wetland

Canal Corp. land 4. 4.

OPPORTUNITIES CONSTRAINTS o 1. Riverwalk - Celebration of historic places - the significance of Three Rivers Point to Native American Heritage 1. The higher elevation of Route 57 and the CSX rail line create a visual and physical barrier to linking Three Rivers should be recognized as well as the revitalization of a strategic waterfront to service the regional population. Point and Maider Rd. 2. Recognition of the site as the location of a former world-class entertainment night club and destination motel. 2. Traffic speed and volume on Route 57 presents a hazardous constraint to potential development at Three Rivers 3. Opportunity for waterfront development with a mix of residential, retail, office space and public open space to Point. Simultaneously, the CSX rail line crossing at Maider Road will need to be taken into consideration when promote a “waterfront village” atmosphere. Three Rivers point should be developed as a destination attraction designing a pedestrian link between adjacent waterfront developments. accessible by both land and water. 3. The present configuration of Maider Rd. may limit waterfront access and residential development in this area. 4. Opportunity to connect adjacent waterfront developments and existing neighborhoods specifically Three Rivers 4. Steep bank and shoreline currently limits shoreline accessibility. Point, Gaskin Road and Maider Road by pedestrian walkways and limited access roadways. 5. Low-lying depression filled with Phragmites and successional scrub shrub vegetation is currently a land locked 5. Moderate grades at shoreline permit water related development with panoramic views. wasteland. 6. Steep road incline and poor site distance could be alleviated by relocating Maider Rd. south to maximize usable 6. Abandoned petroleum product storage facility - future development options are contingent upon the success of land with access to water. brownfield mitigation and clean-up efforts. www.edrcompanies.com Page | 56 Figure 10. Zoning and Property Ownership, Town of Schroeppel

SMTC - Three Rivers SMTC - Three Rivers SMTCThreeAccess - Three RiversAccess RiversStudy Study PRIVATE Access StudyTowns of Clay and OWNERSHIP Access Study PRIVATE Towns Townsof ClaySchroeppel, and of Clay New and York OWNERSHIP Schroeppel,TownsSchroeppel, of NewClay Yorkand New York Schroeppel, New York PRIVATE Hoag PRIVATE OWNERSHIP Figure 9. Hoag OWNERSHIP Figure 9. Zoning and Property Figure 10: PRIVATE OWNERSHIP C Zoning andOwnership Property - S

C PRIVATE OWNERSHIP X PRIVATE OwnershipZoningFigure and - 9: S Town of Schroeppel R OWNERSHIP X PRIVATE a TownOwnership of Schroeppel - Town of R i OWNERSHIP l Zoning and Ownership a

i l Schroeppel PRIVATE - SchroeppelMarch 2011 PRIVATE OWNERSHIP March 2011 OWNERSHIP

STATE OF STATE OF NEW LEGEND shore North NEW YORK shore North YORK Primary Study Area Schroeppel Study Area PRIVATE Schroeppel StudyTax Area Parcel OWNERSHIP PRIVATE Tax Parcel OWNERSHIP Tax ParcelResidential Residential Industrial PRIVATE Industrial OWNERSHIP Planned Dev. PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE OWNERSHIP OWNERSHIP PRIVATE District PRIVATE PRIVATE OWNERSHIP PRIVATE OWNERSHIP OWNERSHIP OWNERSHIP OWNERSHIP One Family Residential District NY State-Owned 57 Property 57 DRAFT PRIVATE DRAFT PRIVATE OWNERSHIP OWNERSHIP March 2011

Notes:

N

o

r Base Map: One-foot N t

h

o

s

r orthoimagery, 2006. h t

h o

s r

e h

o

r

e STATE OF STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK Land Use Key March 2011

O O Land Use Key s s O O One Family Year-Round Residence w w STATE OF NEW YORK Notes: s s e e One Family Year-Round Residence Notes: w w g STATE OF NEW YORK Base Map: One-foot Oswego River g PRIVATE OWNERSHIP Commercial One-Story Small Structure Notes: e o e o Baseorthoimagery, Map: One-foot 2006 g Base Map: One-foot g Commercial One-Story Small Structure R PRIVATE OWNERSHIP R o Ceiling Railroad o orthoimagery, 2006 i orthoimagery, 2006 R i v R v PRIVATE Ceiling Railroad e i r OWNERSHIP State-Owned Land (Not Forest Preserve) iv r PRIVATE e State-Owned Land (Not Forest Preserve) rr S OWNERSHIP h Residential Vacant Land B or

e o S n ho PRIVATE PRIVATE Residential Vacant Land B r Rural Residential s e o t

OWNERSHIP e OWNERSHIPPRIVATE n PRIVATE a Rural Residential s d t OWNERSHIP OWNERSHIP r Seasonal Residential e PRIVATE eer a orth ivv d N OWNERSHIP rr RRi Seasonal Residential h PRIVATEhore ee da a Commercial Self Carwash Nort S iivv eeiid re OWNERSHIP a RR Onn Commercial Self Carwash Sho idida O Vacant Land with Improvements nnee OO Vacant Land with Improvements Oneida River Commercial Warehouse Maider Commercial0 Warehouse100 200 400 600 800 Maider Feet 0 100 200 400 600 800 Feet

www.edrcompanies.com www.edrcompanies.comPage | 57 Figure 11. Opportunities & Constraints, Town of Schroeppel

Three Rivers 2. Access Study Towns of Clay and Schroeppel, New York

1. Figure 11: Opportunites and 3. 1. Constraints for the Town of Schroeppel 4.

LEGEND

2. Opportunities 1. Constraints

FEMA Floodplain

NWI Wetland

4. Canal Corp. land 1.

3.

5.

OPPORTUNITIES CONSTRAINTS o 1. Lands easily accesible from Rte. 57, outside floodplain with water frontage and views. 1. Areas adjacent to river frontage in floodplain not suitable for buildings-no opportunity for Opportunity for development as housing or recreation. waterfront residential or commercial uses; may have value for recreation. 2. Existing Hoag Drive and CSX R.R. crossing provide sole access to eastern 3/4 of study area. 2. Active CSX railroad line bisects site - limits access to east 3/4 of study area and requires 3. Upland area developable as residential or recreation uses. Recreatioal uses (site, not buildings) buffering of noise for adjacent uses. could expand into floodplain and access Oneida River frontage. 3. Lands with prime view owned by Canal Corp. and largely in floodplain. 4. Existing private drive provides opportunity for access to river frontage without crossing 4. Industrial use would require buffer if adjacent land to the south and east is developed as wetlands. residential or recreation.. 5. Potential southern connection to east 3/4 of study area (under Route 57 & R.R.) crosses lands owned by the Canal Corp. www.edrcompanies.com

Page | 58 Figure 12. Redevelopment Concept Alternative 1

Three Rivers Access Study

Towns of Clay and Schroeppel, New York

Figure 12: Town of Clay Redevelopment Concept Alternative 1

LEGEND

Commercial Development, 1 sty.

Mixed Use Commercial/ Residential, 2 sty.

Apartment, 2 sty.

Townhouse Cluster Development

R 15 Single Family Detached

R 7.5 Single Family Detached

Open Space

Existing Roads Proposed Roads Trails/Walks

SITE DATA Commercial Square Footage: 25,525 s.f. Total Commercial Parking Spaces:154 Townhouse Units: 86 Apartments (stand alone & mixed use): 48 R 15 Single Family Units: 7 R 7.5 Single Family Units: 53 o www.edrcompanies.com Page | 59 Figure 13. Redevelopment Concept Alternative 2 (Preliminary)

Three Rivers Access Study

Towns of Clay and Schroeppel, New York

Figure 13: Town of Clay Redevelopment Concept Alternative 2 (Preliminary)

LEGEND

Commercial Development, 1 sty.

Mixed Use Commercial/ Residential, 2 sty.

Apartment, 2 sty.

Townhouse Cluster Development

R 10 Single Family Detached

R 7.5 Single Family Detached

Open Space

Existing Roads Proposed Roads Trails/Walks

SITE DATA Commercial Square Footage: 39,450 s.f. (including 15,000 s.f. entertainment center) Total Commercial Parking Spaces: 815 (including 525 spacs for entertainment center) Townhouse Units: 42 Apartments (stand alone & mixed use): 23 R 10 Single Family Units: 19 o www.edrcompanies.com

Page | 60 Figure 14. Redevelopment Concept Alternative 2

Three Rivers Access Study

Towns of Clay and Schroeppel, New York

Figure 14: Town of Clay Redevelopment Concept Alternative 2

LEGEND

Commercial Development, 1 sty.

Mixed Use Commercial/ Residential, 2 sty.

Apartment, 2 sty.

Townhouse Cluster Development

R 10 Single Family Detached

R 7.5 Single Family Detached

Open Space

Existing Roads Proposed Roads Trails/Walks

SITE DATA Commercial Square Footage: 28,150 s.f. (including 15,00 s.f. entertainment center) Total Commercial Parking Spaces: 628 (including 525 spaces for entertainment center) Townhouse Units: 34 Apartments (stand alone & mixed use): 8 R 10 Single Family Units: 19 o R 7.5 Single Family Units: 14 www.edrcompanies.com Page | 61 Figure 15. Land Use Plan

Three Rivers R.R. Access Study

Route 57 Route Hoag Drive Towns of Clay and Schroeppel,Towns of Clay New and York Schroeppel, New York

Figure 15: Town of Schroeppel Land Existing industrial and commercial uses Land outside floodplain Use Plan and wetlands - suitable for park buildings, parking, and athletic fields and picnicking.

HIGH DENSITY Buildable land Park access road - LEGEND RESIDENTIAL outside floodplain extend to existing boat launch and new dock facilities. Canal Corp and PARK existing industrial/ Park limits commercial land not considered for development 50-foot wooded buffer from adjacent Park development industrial use land Land in floodplain Land in floodplain but not wetlands Land in wetlands or separated - useable for site - suitable for from main park by wetlands - amenities; not athletic fields and suitable for trails. High density structures. picnicking. residential development land Canal Corp. Park limits

Oneida River Canal Corp.

Oswego River Existing boat launch ramp; new docks Private Drive Canal Corp.

www.edrcompanies.com Page | 62 APPENDICES

Page | 63 APPENDIX A : PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PLAN

Page | 64

@smtcmpo.org amckeon

7753; Email:7753; - ate Department Transportation. ate of Syracuse The

5716; Fax: (315) 422 5716; Fax: (315) - Public Involvement Plan Involvement Public , Project , Project Manager Three Rivers Access Study na Street, 100 Clinton 100 na Street, Square, Suite www.smtcmpo.org Syracuse, New YorkSyracuse, 13202 422 Phone: (315) 126 N. Sali this of documentprovided,assistance for inFinancial preparation was the the by part, Transit Federal and Highway Federal Transportation’s of U.S. Department Administrations the and YorkNew St its responsiblecontent. for Council Transportation (SMTC)Metropolitan is solely contact: For further information, Aaron McKeon Metropolitan Transportation Council Syracuse

Page | 65

ng

organization has a organization a has

single

Clay Three Rivers Access Access Rivers Clay Three

Clay Three Rivers StudyAccess nmental Conservationnmental (NYSDEC) lanning process is critical to the success of success the to is critical process lanning

2 s the Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation sthe Syracuse the study’s goals, objectives, and process, as well well as process, and objectives, goals, study’s the

of es es and willgroups invitedbe to participate in this

they often germinate through an open exchange of open an exchange oftenthrough germinate they dvisory Committee and Stakeholder Group Interested Committee dvisory –

ublic awareness awareness ublic publicize the public participation opportunitiesavailable participation activities and publicizepublic the Onondaga County Planning Agency County(SOCPA)– Onondaga Planning Agency to

makers to define the goals and objectivesthe of and goals the to define makers

ic participation is mandated, it is also practical. No practical. is italso is mandated, ic participation Create p Create as study; the and throughout the process. throughout public planning the Involve

Goals (1) Introduction Town of ClayTown of Schroeppel Town (CNYRTA) YorkAuthority New Regional Transportation Central State (NYSDOT) of Transportation York Department New State of Enviro York Department New Authority (Canal Corporation) Thruway State York New (OCDOT) County Department of Transportation Onondaga Syracuse Planni DepartmentDevelopment, Tourism and of Community County Oswego CSX Nation Onondaga Formation of StudyFormation A (2) , to develop alternatives, and to evaluate the alternatives. to evaluate and alternatives, , to develop

          

monopoly on ideas good monopoly the public of obligation the shared to promote is intention the SMTC’s information. It decision and Study II. While publ is to: I. in often the p and the public early Engaging businesses, local citizens,agencies, public affected Council (SMTC)to provide to with on opportunity a comment interestedparties reasonable other and government, plans and programs. transportation of intent The the Public Plan (PIP) Involvement for the the includes a effort: formationto two groups assist SMTC PIP the of in study The the Committee (SAC) Advisory Study and stakeholders a Selected group. representatives the following from affected agenci SAC as members: study any transportation plan or program, and is required by numerous state and federal laws. state numerous laws. is and requiredand federal transportationor plan by program, any on public Metropolitan underscoresneed the for calling involvement, legislation Such Organizations such (MPO) Planning a III.

Page | 66 off -

Clay Three will be responsiblefor

takeholders (a broader group of interested interested broader of group (a takeholders

3 y of the SMTC. Conducting the SAC meetings SAC the meetings the of SMTC. Conducting y

SAC will meetings be held throughout course the

al impacts of each concept plan plan concept the of each and impacts transportation al five a from the Town and will automatically thoseinclude Townthe will automatically from and a gnificant study developments, notified of all public public all of notified study developments, gnificant

provide the provide opportunity to present theformally study to the

and guidance throughout the the throughout andproject. guidance r citizen from input obtained this if and, meeting necessary, the initial and Public Comment Public and group. However, the SMTC will actively seek input at inputits at “kick seek actively SMTCthe will However, group.

Other SMTC member agencies as as appropriate. agencies SMTC member Other Meetings

during specific at stages meetings/workshops involvement SMTC The will hold public location, press meeting issuing a securing for SMTC responsible The will be study. the and mailingreleases, meeting fliers. The selected consultant creating meeting materials an presentation (including slides, a agenda, creating flier, anyand Two each of summary meeting. a preparing and meetings, the running visual aids), are anticipated. meetings public public first The meeting will the of area, inventory introduce existing conditions an withinstudy the present public, from The public. the initial feedback seek town and the by proposed two initial concepts SAC will conside willcomments. plans on public be modified based concept The second public meeting will take place after the alternatives analysis task of the analysis the of task alternatives the after place will meeting take public second The At this meeting, project. the potenti system and land use mitigation measures associated with each concept plan will be willplan concept be with associated each measures mitigation use land and system is It anticipated that minimuma of The SAC willThe meet with SMTCregularly the to the assist in managing project. The to and deliverables of content technical on the SMTC the to advise will SAC’s be role input needed provide study. the the Securingand of location announcing meeting (facility) a SAC meetings will be mailings responsibilit the through the materials, presentations, etc.), and preparing preparationagenda, of (including selected of the the responsibility willconsultant. be meeting each minutes from meeting” and throughoutmeeting” of course the the study regarding individualsadditional who provide and perspective. input activity and in this planning valuable participate could IV. In addition to the SAC, a list of interested s addition to SAC,listthe interested a of In individuals with significant relations and interest in the study will be by area) maintained in study the interest and relations individuals with significant SMTC.the The SMTC will to attempt obtain a list property owners of residential and are to theadjacent study addresses addedwill on input be based list. Additional individualsstakeholders stakeholders on the stakeholders The SACthepertinentthe sent willand studyfrom be community. si of apprised kept information, meetings, encouraged theand feedback meetings, regarding to comment provide Study. Access Rivers SACthe on the and initial representation sponsors will determine SMTC project The and stakeholders

Page | 67 ting

study’s ation atation sites may be on the be may

: The SMTC will work work SMTC: The will : deemed necessary (at If

provide a brief overview of the overview the of brief a provide specific informspecific - addressed survey on a particular on a survey addressed -

4 ncing to the details all of public meetings) all

he study he helpand publicize meetings. public The Clay Three Rivers Access Study Access Rivers Clay Three mitigation measures, as well as on the on the as plans. concept as well measures, mitigation specific public meetings. meetings. specific public -

eed a sign language interpreter, assistive learning system, or system, learning assistive interpreter, language sign a eed

tudy issue. issue. is tudy thealso SMTC’sIt intent to work with and other encourage

project. Detaileddiscussion project. analysis the recommendations of and will be study the at provided the discretion of the SAC and/or other appropriate SMTC committees), the SMTC committees), appropriate other and/or the SAC of the discretion distribute studySMTC miscellaneous may stores, convenience centers, community schools, area (e.g. study the throughout more include or This information one following: the introductory of etc.). may pre a and comment notice, card, meeting flier, of with existing activities this study for activities outreach public ate to coordin in thecommunity groups The study SMTC thearea. will seek assistance the of Clay of Town Department Planning andof organizations Zoning and community theword out”to “get about t out toSMTC in will these reach studyearly community the processgroups to study the public them of inform requested, opportunities for input. and SMTC If meetings to existing community will attend staff Coordination with organizationsexisting community s to assist in material or publications to include in their this information agencies distribution. Material distribution locations within area at Material study

Press Releases/Media Coverage Releases/Media Press

ct contact with to the encouraged submit are to SMTC contact comments the SMTCct staff) : All meetings (SAC and public) will be held in a handicapped accessible facility in accessible facility handicapped in (SAC held a will be public) : All and meetings lcome tolcome attend any the of publicized SMTC Policy Planning Executive, and

All citizens (especially those who are not able to attend the public meetings or participate participate or meetings public the to attend not able thoseare who All citizens (especially in dire time. any at This message will be publicized and made throughoutclear study’s the is public also material The publications. and study on all and verbally, schedule, project we the in which Committee meetings agenda item. a discussion as agenda methods, results and proposed and methods, results presented.summarized and The public invitedwill be to provide feedback on the Note effort every make SMTC The will Act. with Disabilities with Americans the compliance n who to those to respond otheraccommodations any the public’s in to participation thefacilitate transportation process. planning (annou SMTCreleases The will news issue thein advance. radio television stations, necessary, and minornewspapers, If and major its outreach increase thefurther to public, To the conduc and SMTC initiating will be a variety of public involvement of public activities: variety a V.

Page | 68 t . Clay Rivers Three

, the SAC and interested interested and SAC , the

Clay Three Rivers Access Study Rivers Access Clay Three

, its progress and development, thisand is , itsthe progress

5 istributed to 1,500nearly individuals, ofsome SAC, stakeholders, and others interested or others and interested SAC, stakeholders,

e newsletter/flier/report to convey eto study newsletter/flier/report convey timely a gh the standard outreach. the standard outreach. gh

anticipated thaton the anticipated articles nts pertaining to the to the nts pertaining ibute fliers/announcements and speaking to the members of to members the speaking and fliers/announcements ibute

ssist them in better citizensnotifying and community groups specific mentioned material previously may posted be also at Clay Three Rivers Access Study Rivers Access Clay Three As for speaking to the media on specific issues and questions issues and on specific media to the speaking for As - terested stakeholders with associated terested study) the interviewed are ee Rivers Access Study Access Rivers ee (e.g. study study development issues(e.g. orthe of or announcement a coverage Clay Three Rivers Access Study. Rivers Access Clay Three

Clay Thr

SMTC Publications Miscellaneous Public Involvement Efforts Involvement Public Miscellaneous

by the media,by please limit tocomments respective agency’s opinion your or your in study. involvement the possible, inquiriesIf media all directed should be to SMTCthe staffordirector project members, (e.g. SMTC committee this possible. However, you If is not always manager. SAC members, in and/or SMTC or the additional willsend releases, take also initiative to promote news media on pertinent developme coverage the regarding of SMTC. the exclusive responsibility VI. news DIRECTIONS, about SMTC that offers its newsletter, The publishesactivities a studies. particular and This is newsletter d whom include the media; local, state, and media; and the withstate, associated whom include federal local, agencies SMTC; the large a representatives; and and agencies officials; community elected and municipal is interested citizens. of number It StudyAccess SMTCto perform the is prepared task. thisis also additional development staff It will be DIRECTIONS, newsletter, listSMTC the of mailing important to that the note the of members all to include updated in the involved public meeting) will be published in subsequent issues of DIRECTIONS. Should the the Should DIRECTIONS. issues of publishedin willsubsequent be meeting) public arise forproductionthe need separat a of VII. libraries, local stores, shopping centers, and/or businesses. and/or shopping stores, centers, local libraries, in the vicinity of willarea. the study belibraries News releases to produced the announce submittedto to comments be items, the invite such written as of well as availability SMTC. Meeting notices notices studyMeeting and a made available be may Report, suchstudy’s Final documents, the as Approved stakeholders will serve publicstakeholders to promote further in involvement (and to areas not throu reached were individuals) that living and/or workingliving in study the area about meetingspublic the andstudy the in Such general. requesta in to order is “grassrootsimperative the get community” to helping distr By involved. about the the community To further its efforts, the SMTCTo further public involvement the SAC asking will be and members stakeholders tointerested a

Page | 69 r general r general and any final any and public involvement involvement public pportunities for nearby nearby pportunities for

will also will serve also aas resource fo

6

) Clay Three Rivers Access Study, Access Clay Three Rivers , as well as solicit input from affected citizens and citizens and affected from input solicit as well , as www.smtcmpo.org

Conclusion

III. information about the SMTC,the the about information reports. approved a need arises certain If perception/opinion to public get topic/issue, particular on a used of the one be public may at or more surveys meetings. V SMTC The web site ( the throughout SMTC the values is and important for attitudes public to It understand Study Access Rivers Clay Three in this described activities the representatives. Through community to public the opportunities for provide SMTC input public the and plan, will solicit awareness involvementdevelop and thatgreater of in project. active the study hasa In o of andlife recreational quality the potential to the enhance and visitors,is involvement public paramount. residents

Page | 70 7:00 p.m. Clay Town Hall Clay Town 4401 Route 31 The meeting facility is handicapped accessible. November 17, 2010 17, November For more information, or to request accommodations, please contact: Aaron McKeon Council Transportation Syracuse Metropolitan 13202 126 North Salina St., Syracuse, NY 315.422.5716 [email protected] www.smtcmpo.org Three Rivers Access Study Public Meeting Three Rivers Point? Three Rivers What is your vision for Council (SMTC) is currently Transportation The Syracuse Metropolitan area on Point Three Rivers conducting a transportation the access study for The purpose of this study is to assess the of Clay. Town behalf of the Three potential transportation of the impacts associated with redevelopment the area. area and to guide adoption of a reuse plan for Point Rivers proposes Revitalization Plan (LWRP) Waterfront Local of Clay’s Town The center to include area into a mixed-use Point Three Rivers the redeveloping and public open space. retail space, office space, housing, Three Rivers the This access study options for will refine redevelopment assess the impacts of redevelopment examine access to the area, area, Point with a the town provide ultimately, and, on the local transportation system, this area. redeveloping guide for of this meeting are to: The goals conditions within the study area; existing • review and concepts; • present preliminary redevelopment feedback on these concepts. • gather public

Page | 71 31 Hall p.m. 2011

29, Route 6:30 Town June 4401 Clay to offset impacts of additional traffic.

PUBLIC MEETING The meeting facility is handicapped accessible. he Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council (SMTC), working on behalf working Council (SMTC), Transportation Metropolitan he Syracuse is conducting a transportation access study for the Three of Clay, Town of the

Rivers Point area. The purpose of this study is to identify the possible transportation area. Point Rivers for this area that may be considered impacts associated with the kind of development in the future. results of the traffic study We will be discussing the This is the final public meeting. area. and suggested ways of mitigating traffic impacts in this T are to: The goals of this final public meeting • • plans, the conceptual redevelopment Review • of the traffic study, the results Share ideas for how Discuss the transportation in this network to improve thoughts on how want to hear your We trails and bikewaystogether to meet your roads, can work including how area, transportation needs. McKeon accommodations, please contact: Aaron information or to request more For Council Transportation Metropolitan Syracuse NY 13202 100, Syracuse, Suite Street, Salina 126 North 315.422.5716 | [email protected] www.smtcmpo.org Three Rivers Access Study Access Rivers Three

Page | 72 APPENDIX B : TRAFFIC VOLUME FIGURES

Page | 73 Page | 74 Page | 75 Page | 76 Page | 77 Page | 78 Page | 79 APPENDIX C : SYNCHRO 6 REPORTS

Page | 80                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 

Page | 81                                                                                                                                                                                  

Page | 82                                                                                                                                                                   

Page | 83                                                                                                                                                                                               

Page | 84                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                

Page | 85                                                                                                                                                                                 

Page | 86                                                                                                                                                                 

Page | 87                                                                                                                                                                                                 

Page | 88                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 

Page | 89                                                                                                                                                                                  

Page | 90                                                                                                                                                                        

Page | 91                                                                                                                                                                                             

Page | 92                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     

Page | 93                                                                                                                                                                                  

Page | 94                                                                                                                                                                      

Page | 95                                                                                                                                                                                                    

Page | 96                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    

Page | 97                                                                                                                                                                                   

Page | 98                                                                                                                                                                       

Page | 99                                                                                                                                                                                                      

Page | 100                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 

Page | 101                                                                                                                                                                                  

Page | 102                                                                                                                                                                     

Page | 103                                                                                                                                                                                               

Page | 104 APPENDIX D : TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS & NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUME CALCULATIONS

Page | 105 Trip Generation Calculations 200,000 SF General Office Building (LUC 710)

Weekday AM Peak Hour Average Rate = 1.55 1.55 * 200 = 310 total trips [at Rt 57 & Rt 31] 310 * 50% = 155 trips [at Rt 57]

Travel Direction Ratio Vehicle Entering 88% 136 Existing 12% 19

Weekday PM Peak Hour Average Rate = 1.49 1.49 * 200 = 298 total trips [at Rt 57 & Rt 31] 298 * 50% = 149 trips [at Rt 57]

Travel Direction Ratio Vehicle Entering 17% 25 Existing 83% 124

Weekend Peak Hour Average Rate = 0.41 0.41 * 200 = 82 total trips [at Rt 57 & Rt 31] 82 * 50% = 41 trips [at Rt 57]

Travel Direction Ratio Vehicle Entering 54% 22 Existing 46% 19

Summary General AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour SAT Peak Hour Office Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Building 136 19 155 25 124 149 22 19 41 ITE Trip Generation, 8th Edition Page | 106

Dewberry-Goodkind, Inc. 1 Trip Generation Calculations 100,000 SF Specialty Retail Center (LUC 814)

Weekday PM Peak Hour Average Rate = 2.71 2.71 * 100 = 271 total trips [at Rt 57 & Rt 31] 271 * 50% = 135 trips [at Rt 57]

Travel Direction Ratio Vehicle Entering 44% 59 Existing 56% 76

Weekend Peak Hour Average Rate = 2.71 2.71 * 100 = 271 total trips [at Rt 57 & Rt 31] 271 * 50% = 135 trips [at Rt 57]

Travel Direction Ratio Vehicle Entering 44% 59 Existing 56% 76

Summary Specialty AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour SAT Peak Hour Retail Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Center ------59 76 135 59 76 135 ITE Trip Generation, 8th Edition --- could be not calculated since Specialty Retail Center’s AM Peak Hour does not practically fall into the timeframe between 07:00am and 09:00am

Page | 107

Dewberry-Goodkind, Inc. 2 No Build 2020 Projected Traffic Volume Calculations (North-South bound of NY County Route 57 at intersection with NY State Route 31)

Factors: Growth Rate = 1.5% Number of Year = 10

Formula: Projected Future Traffic Volume = (Current Traffic Volume *((1 + Growth Rate) ^Number of Year)) + Trip Generation Volume

Table 1: 2020 No- Build Traffic Volume Traffic Current Growth Number Trip 2020 Traffic Intersection Count Traffic Factor Of Generation Volume Time Volume % Years Volume (at Rt 57) (Total) Route 57 AM Peak hour 1,806 1.5 10 78 2,155 & PM Peak Hour 3,377 1.5 10 142 4,026 Route 31 SAT Peak Hour 3,387 1.5 10 88 3,983 Route 57 AM Peak hour 306 1.5 10 ‐‐‐ 355 & PM Peak Hour 633 1.5 10 ‐‐‐ 735 Verplank Rd SAT Peak Hour 667 1.5 10 ‐‐‐ 774 Route 57 AM Peak hour 316 1.5 10 ‐‐‐ 367 & PM Peak Hour 612 1.5 10 ‐‐‐ 710 Maider Rd SAT Peak Hour 606 1.5 10 ‐‐‐ 703 Route 57 AM Peak hour 412 1.5 10 ‐‐‐ 478 & PM Peak Hour 803 1.5 10 ‐‐‐ 932 County Rd 57A SAT Peak Hour 717 1.5 10 ‐‐‐ 832

Page | 108

Dewberry-Goodkind, Inc. 3 APPENDIX E : PUBLIC COMMENTS

Page | 109 SUMMARY OF COMMENTS FROM PUBLIC MEETING #1

Context and history of the Three Rivers area: . When the Three Rivers Inn was around both Chubby Checker and Frank Sinatra were said to have visited it. . The Clay Town historian has a stack of pictures regarding the Three Rivers Inn that she is willing to share. . There was a concern over whether or not the Native Americans have been invited to comment on this study.

General questions/comments: . There was a question about how many homes and the number of people expected to move in if the concept plans were to come to fruition. . A gentleman was concerned that the area would eventually look just like the area south of Route 31 and that he was not in favor of that. He moved into the area because of the suburban/rural atmosphere and he is afraid that there will be a population density that he does not want. He likes the semi-rural density they currently have. . It seemed that many were in favor of keeping the area a family friendly area. . How do these concepts fit with the Town’s desire to limit growth North of Route 31? . The Town should first clean up the area and then focus on redevelopment. . Consider green development for this area. . Would the proposed commercial uses be seasonally dependent?

Specific features of the plans that people liked: . Re-routing Maider is a positive.

Concerns about impacts: . School district (Phoenix CSD) . Traffic volume on Route 57. . Location of new water and sewer – will existing residences be able to connect? . Traffic on Gaskin Road. . Safety along the shoreline.

Page | 110 . Routing for detours if there is an accident on Route 57. . Stormwater management (runoff from Route 57). . Safety of vehicles, peds, and bicyclists, especially at: Route 57/Verplank Road and Route 57/Maider Road. . It will be a challenge to widen Route 57 north of Route 31.

Suggestions for modifying concept plans:

Transportation system: . Dead-end Gaskin Road. . Include turn lane on Route 57 at Verplank Road.

Land uses (general) . Include a buffer (concern primarily about noise) between entertainment center and residential areas. . Include more public park space, especially west of Route 57. Retain as much green space as possible. . No residential development and limited commercial development west of Route 57. . No commercial use, just park space. . Encourage residential use east of Route 57. . This area should be an alternative to intense development on Route 31.

. Retain the waterfront as a community resource and not a private use.

Land uses (specific) . Include a welcome center with historic items west of Route 57 where the three rivers intersect. . Eliminate the boat slips at the Three Rivers Point . Include a hotel/motel with a couple of restaurants for any boaters coming in to the area. . Include the moat idea represented in the 2000 study. . Provide fishing access. . An additional marina is not necessary.

Page | 111 Page | 112 Public Comment from Informational Meeting #1 Page | 113 Public Comment from Informational Meeting #1 Public Comment from Informational Meeting #1 Page | 114 Clay Three Rivers Access Study Public Meeting Notes

Meeting Date & Time: June 29, 2011, 6:30 PM Location: Clay Town Hall Attendees: 14 (excluding SAC members)

Welcome & Introductions – SMTC Staff

Aaron McKeon introduced the project team and gave a brief overview of the project and SMTC’s role in the project.

Presentation – Access Study Findings – EDR

Project Manager Jane Rice gave a presentation on the progress to date with the Three Rivers Access Study, emphasizing the fact that the study is meant to examine potential traffic impacts resulting from hypothetical redevelopment of the Three Rivers Point area.

Jane walked meeting attendees through the process, which included: • An evaluation of existing site conditions; • A review of existing planning documents, for both the Town of Schroeppel and the Town of Clay; • Development of concept plans for the study area; • Public review of these concept plans; • Hypothetical allocation of land uses and square footage within the concept plans; • Traffic analysis based on these land use allocations.

Jane summarized the outcome of the traffic analysis, which anticipates minor impacts to the study area intersections. Also discussed was the possibility of increased traffic on Gaskin Road and ways in which this might be mitigated.

The floor was then opened for questions and comments.

Page | 115 Questions and Comments

Q: Could Maider Road be reconfigured around the railroad?

A: When dealing with the railroad, changes could take a long time but they are possible.

Q: Is there a signal planned for Maider Road?

A: No. Our analysis shows that a signal would be needed under Redevelopment Concept Alternative 2, but no signal is currently planned.

Q: Since you are trying to create a pedestrian friendly environment would a traffic light help?

A: A signal has not been proposed for this location but, yes, a signal would benefit pedestrian movements.

Q: Are you proposing any speed limit modifications?

A: This hypothetical proposal has high volumes associated with it and this is intended to give the public a good baseline for any future proposals. Speed limits were changed for this study but changes in speed limits are a good mitigation once there is a real proposal.

Q: Explain Level of Service “A”.

A: Level of Services A indicates that there is no noticeable delay for drivers: the intersection has enough capacity (lanes / turn lanes / roadway width) to accommodate the peak-hour traffic volumes.

Q: We got the feeling at the last meeting that nobody wanted this type of development so why is it still being proposed?

A: We are not proposing anything. We are just looking at potential impacts of a “what if” scenario.

Page | 116 Q: What about commuter rail to this area?

A: Getting service on this CSX line is difficult because they do not like to mix freight and pedestrians on the same line. However, this can happen.

Q: Why is Maider Road being proposed as a dead end?

A: Maider is proposed this way to respect the current property owners and to continue to provide access to their homes. If this was a real development there would have been some sort of meeting with these home owners. The dead end scenario is hypothetical.

Q: Have you looked at safety?

A: Safety was discussed but this study did not include a safety analysis. If a real development were being proposed, a safety analysis would have been completed.

Q: Who do we contact for complaints about the Route 57 and Route 31 signal?

A: New York State Department of Transportation

Next Steps The study is nearly complete: when it’s complete, it will be available for public review on the SMTC’s website. Jane Rice thanked meeting attendees for their time and adjourned the meeting.

Page | 117 Page | 118 Public Comment from Informational Meeting #2 Public Comment from Informational Meeting #2 Page | 119 APPENDIX F : SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUME FIGURES

Page | 120 Page | 121 Page | 122 Page | 123 Page | 124 Page | 125 Page | 126 APPENDIX G : TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS AND FUTURE BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUME CALCULATIONS

Page | 127 Clay 3 Rivers

Back-up Documentation

Page | 128 Site Generated Traffic

Page | 129 Page | 130 Page | 131 Page | 132 Page | 133 Page | 134 Page | 135 ITE Land Use Assumptions

Page | 136 Page | 137 Page | 138 Page | 139 Page | 140 Trip Generation Volumes

Page | 141 Alternative 1

Page | 142 Page | 143 Page | 144 Page | 145 Page | 146 Page | 147 Page | 148 Page | 149 Alternative 2

Page | 150 Page | 151 Page | 152 Page | 153 Page | 154 Page | 155 Page | 156 Volume Assignments

Page | 157 Page | 158 Page | 159 Page | 160 Page | 161 Page | 162 Page | 163 Alternative 1

Page | 164 Page | 165 Page | 166 Page | 167 Page | 168 Page | 169 Page | 170 Page | 171 Page | 172 Page | 173 Page | 174 Page | 175 Page | 176 Page | 177 Page | 178 Alternative 2

Page | 179 Page | 180 Page | 181 Page | 182 Page | 183 Page | 184 Page | 185 Page | 186 Page | 187 Page | 188 Page | 189 Synchro Printouts

Page | 190 Existing

(2010)

Page | 191