DEVELOPMENTS State Liability for Violations of International Humanitarian Law - The Distomo Case Before the German Federal Constitutional Court By Markus Rau∗ A. Introduction For quite some time the question of how to cope with violations of international humanitarian law was primarily one of individual criminal responsibility.1 However, over the last few years, the position of the victims of armed conflict has increasingly come into focus. In particular, attention has been given to the issue of reparations, including compensation,2 for breaches of international humanitarian law.3 ∗ Research Fellow, Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and Public International Law, Heidelberg (Germany). The author can be contacted at:
[email protected]. 1 See, e.g., Kai Ambos, Zur Bestrafung von Verbrechen im internationalen., nicht-internationalen und internen Konflikt, in HUMANITÄRES VÖLKERRECHT: POLITISCHE, RECHTLICHE UND STRAFGERICHTLICHE DIMENSIONEN 325 (Jana Hasse, Erwin Müller and Patricia Schneider eds., 2001); M. Cherif Bassiouni, Accountability for Violations of International Humanitarian Law and Other Serious Violations of Human Rights, 2001 THE GLOBAL COMMUNITY (YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE) 3 (2001); ELIES VAN SLIEDREGT, THE CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY OF INDIVIDUALS FOR VIOLATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW (2003). 2 It is generally understood that under international law reparation can take the form of restitution, compensation or satisfaction, either singly or in combination. In regard to inter-state relations,