Project Adair: Orkney and the Pentland Firth Mapping Marine Heritage Sites 30032012

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Project Adair: Orkney and the Pentland Firth Mapping Marine Heritage Sites 30032012 293 Project Adair: Orkney and the Pentland Firth Mapping Marine Heritage Sites 30032012 Project Adair: Mapping Marine Heritage Sites in Orkney and the Pentland Firth Desk-based assessment Project No: 293 ORCA Orkney College East Road Kirkwall Orkney KW15 1LX Report: Edward Pollard, Mark Littlewood, Mary Saunders, Robert Forbes, Kevin Heath HS Project Manager: Philip Robertson ORCA Project Manager: Paul Sharman RCAHMS Project Consultant: George Geddes Funded by: Historic Scotland March 2012 © Historic Scotland 2012 This documents has been prepared in accordance with ORCA standard operating procedures and IFA standards Authorised for distribution by: Date: © Historic Scotland (HS) 3 293 Project Adair: Orkney and the Pentland Firth Mapping Marine Heritage Sites 30032012 Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................... 9 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................... 10 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................ 11 2.0 Background ........................................................................................ 11 2.1 Project Adair ........................................................................................ 11 2.2 Marine legislation in regards to cultural heritage .................................. 12 2.3 Orkney and the Pentland Firth ............................................................. 15 3.0 Aims and Objectives of the Project .................................................. 15 4.0 Methodology ....................................................................................... 17 4.1 Sourcing datasets ................................................................................ 17 4.2 Data Interrogation ................................................................................ 20 4.3 Databases ............................................................................................ 21 4.4 Polygonisation ..................................................................................... 23 5.0 Results: Assessment of the data ...................................................... 25 5.1 The Datasets deriving from marine geophysics ................................... 25 5.1.1 Crown Estate side-scan sonar ............................................................ 25 5.1.2 Crown Estate multi-beam echosounder .............................................. 25 5.1.3 SeaZone TruDepths ........................................................................... 26 5.1.4 British Geological Survey Sub-Bottom Profiles ................................... 28 5.1.5 British Geological Survey Cores and Grab Samples ........................... 28 5.1.6 Marine Scotland Multi-Beam Echosounder ......................................... 29 5.1.7 UKHO Multi-Beam Echosounder ........................................................ 29 5.2 Non geophysics related data sources .................................................. 30 5.2.1 RCAHMS Aerial Photographs ............................................................. 30 5.2.1 Historic Charts .................................................................................... 32 5.2.2 Local Knowledge ................................................................................ 33 5.2.3 Commercial Projects .......................................................................... 33 5.2.4 Research Projects .............................................................................. 34 5.2.5 Canmore ............................................................................................ 34 5.2.6 SeaZone Hydrospatial ........................................................................ 35 5.2.7 Highland HER .................................................................................... 35 5.2.8 Orkney SMR ....................................................................................... 35 5.2.9 Shipwreck-density maps ..................................................................... 36 5.2.10 Wreck websites .................................................................................. 37 5.3 Datasets not reviewed ......................................................................... 37 6.0 Results: Data review .......................................................................... 39 6.1 Crown Estate side-scan sonar ............................................................. 39 6.2 Crown Estate multi-beam echosounder ............................................... 42 6.3 British Geological Survey sub-bottom profiles ..................................... 43 © Historic Scotland (HS) 4 293 Project Adair: Orkney and the Pentland Firth Mapping Marine Heritage Sites 30032012 6.4 British Geological Survey cores and grab samples .............................. 45 6.5 Historic Charts ..................................................................................... 46 6.6 UKHO Multi-Beam Echosounder ......................................................... 50 6.7 SeaZone TruDepths ............................................................................ 55 6.8 Marine Scotland Multi-Beam Echosounder .......................................... 56 6.9 RCAHMS aerial photographs ............................................................... 56 6.10 Whittaker Density Map ......................................................................... 61 6.11 Local knowledge .................................................................................. 62 6.12 Commercial projects ............................................................................ 63 6.13 Research projects ................................................................................ 64 7.0 The Updated Marine Historic Environment Record of Orkney and the Pentland Firth ............................................................................ 64 7.1 Submerged terrestrial archaeological sites .......................................... 64 7.2 Submerged palaeo-landscapes ........................................................... 66 7.3 Shipwrecks and losses ........................................................................ 68 7.4 Aircraft losses ...................................................................................... 69 7.5 Landing places ..................................................................................... 69 7.6 Anchorages .......................................................................................... 70 7.7 Fishing Areas ....................................................................................... 71 7.8 Tidal causeways and ferry crossings ................................................... 71 7.9 Other marine features .......................................................................... 72 8.0 Discussion .......................................................................................... 72 8.1 Areas of sensitivity around Orkney and the Pentland Firth .................. 72 8.1.1 Sites of harbours, landing places, bridges, causeways and fords ....... 72 8.1.2 Locations of known navigational hazards, historic anchorages, sea- routes and fishing areas ..................................................................... 73 8.1.3 Areas of high sediment accumulation ................................................. 74 8.1.4 Preservation potential in high-energy environments ........................... 75 8.2 Data quality .......................................................................................... 76 8.2.1 MBES data ......................................................................................... 76 8.2.2 Side-scan sonar data.......................................................................... 77 8.2.3 SeaZone TruDepths ........................................................................... 77 8.2.4 Sub-bottom profiles and cores ............................................................ 78 8.2.5 Aerial photography ............................................................................. 78 8.3 Key data gaps ...................................................................................... 78 8.4 Updating the record ............................................................................. 79 8.5 Recommendations ............................................................................... 81 8.5.1 Submerged archaeological sites and landscapes ............................... 81 8.5.2 Investigations of the foreshore and shallow inshore areas, particularly around harbours and ports ................................................................. 82 8.5.3 Recommendations for future record enhancement projects: The datasets ............................................................................................. 83 8.5.4 Recommendations for future record enhancement projects: The databases ........................................................................................... 85 9.0 Conclusions........................................................................................ 86 9.1 Interrogation of marine datasets .......................................................... 86 9.2 Assimilation of data into databases ..................................................... 86 © Historic Scotland (HS) 5 293 Project Adair: Orkney and the Pentland Firth Mapping Marine Heritage Sites 30032012 9.3 Future archaeological research ..........................................................
Recommended publications
  • Scapa Flow Scale Site Environmental Description 2019
    Scapa Flow Scale Test Site – Environmental Description January 2019 Uncontrolled when printed Document History Revision Date Description Originated Reviewed Approved by by by 0.1 June 2010 Initial client accepted Xodus LF JN version of document Aurora 0.2 April 2011 Inclusion of baseline wildlife DC JN JN monitoring data 01 Dec 2013 First registered version DC JN JN 02 Jan 2019 Update of references and TJ CL CL document information Disclaimer In no event will the European Marine Energy Centre Ltd or its employees or agents, be liable to you or anyone else for any decision made or action taken in reliance on the information in this report or for any consequential, special or similar damages, even if advised of the possibility of such damages. While we have made every attempt to ensure that the information contained in the report has been obtained from reliable sources, neither the authors nor the European Marine Energy Centre Ltd accept any responsibility for and exclude all liability for damages and loss in connection with the use of the information or expressions of opinion that are contained in this report, including but not limited to any errors, inaccuracies, omissions and misleading or defamatory statements, whether direct or indirect or consequential. Whilst we believe the contents to be true and accurate as at the date of writing, we can give no assurances or warranty regarding the accuracy, currency or applicability of any of the content in relation to specific situations or particular circumstances. Title: Scapa Flow Scale Test
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats and Species Surveys in the Pentland Firth and Orkney Waters: Updated October 2016
    TOPIC SHEET NUMBER 34 V3 SOUTH RONALDSAY Along the eastern coast of the island at 30m the HABITATS AND SPECIES SURVEYS IN THE PENTLAND videos revealed a seabed of coarse sand and scoured rocky outcrops. The sand was inhabited FIRTH AND ORKNEY WATERS by echinoderms and crustaceans, while the rock was generally bare with sparse Alcyonium digitatum (Dead men’s fi nger) and numerous DUNCANSBY HEAD PAPA WESTRAY WESTRAY Echinus esculentus. Dense brittlestar beds were The seabed recorded to the south of Duncansby SANDAY found to the south. Further north at a depth Head is fl at bedrock with patches of sand, of 50 m the seabed took the form of a mosaic cobbles and boulders. The rock surface is quite ROUSAY MAINLAND STRONSAY of rippled sand, bedrock and boulders with bare other than dense patches of red algae, ORKNEY occasional hydroids and bryozoans. clumps of hydroids and dense brittlestar beds. SCAPA FLOW HOY COPINSAY SOUTH RONALDSAY PENTLAND FIRTH STROMA DUNCANSBY HEAD CAITHNESS VIDEO AND PHOTOGRAPH SITES IN SOUTHERN PART OF ANEMONES URTICINA FELINA ON TIDESWEPT SURVEYED AREA CIRCALITTORAL ROCK Introduction mussels off Copinsay, also found off Noss Head. An extensive coverage of loose-lying Data availability References Marine Scotland Science has been collecting red alga was found in the east of Scapa Flow video and photographic stills from the Pentland The biotope classifi cations and the underlying Moore, C.G. (2009). Preliminary assessment of the on muddy sand and sandeels were also found Firth and Orkney Islands as part of a wider video and images are all available through conservation importance of benthic epifaunal species off west Hoy.
    [Show full text]
  • Results of the Seabird 2000 Census – Great Skua
    July 2011 THE DATA AND MAPS PRESENTED IN THESE PAGES WAS INITIALLY PUBLISHED IN SEABIRD POPULATIONS OF BRITAIN AND IRELAND: RESULTS OF THE SEABIRD 2000 CENSUS (1998-2002). The full citation for the above publication is:- P. Ian Mitchell, Stephen F. Newton, Norman Ratcliffe and Timothy E. Dunn (Eds.). 2004. Seabird Populations of Britain and Ireland: results of the Seabird 2000 census (1998-2002). Published by T and A.D. Poyser, London. More information on the seabirds of Britain and Ireland can be accessed via http://www.jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-1530. To find out more about JNCC visit http://www.jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-1729. Table 1a Numbers of breeding Great Skuas (AOT) in Scotland and Ireland 1969–2002. Administrative area Operation Seafarer SCR Census Seabird 2000 Percentage Percentage or country (1969–70) (1985–88) (1998–2002) change since change since Seafarer SCR Shetland 2,968 5,447 6,846 131% 26% Orkney 88 2,0001 2,209 2410% 10% Western Isles– 19 113 345 1716% 205% Comhairle nan eilean Caithness 0 2 5 150% Sutherland 4 82 216 5300% 163% Ross & Cromarty 0 1 8 700% Lochaber 0 0 2 Argyll & Bute 0 0 3 Scotland Total 3,079 7,645 9,634 213% 26% Co. Mayo 0 0 1 Ireland Total 0 0 1 Britain and Ireland Total 3,079 7,645 9,635 213% 26% Note 1 Extrapolated from a count of 1,652 AOT in 1982 (Meek et al., 1985) using previous trend data (Furness, 1986) to estimate numbers in 1986 (see Lloyd et al., 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Cruising the ISLANDS of ORKNEY
    Cruising THE ISLANDS OF ORKNEY his brief guide has been produced to help the cruising visitor create an enjoyable visit to TTour islands, it is by no means exhaustive and only mentions the main and generally obvious anchorages that can be found on charts. Some of the welcoming pubs, hotels and other attractions close to the harbour or mooring are suggested for your entertainment, however much more awaits to be explored afloat and many other delights can be discovered ashore. Each individual island that makes up the archipelago offers a different experience ashore and you should consult “Visit Orkney” and other local guides for information. Orkney waters, if treated with respect, should offer no worries for the experienced sailor and will present no greater problem than cruising elsewhere in the UK. Tides, although strong in some parts, are predictable and can be used to great advantage; passage making is a delight with the current in your favour but can present a challenge when against. The old cruising guides for Orkney waters preached doom for the seafarer who entered where “Dragons and Sea Serpents lie”. This hails from the days of little or no engine power aboard the average sailing vessel and the frequent lack of wind amongst tidal islands; admittedly a worrying combination when you’ve nothing but a scrap of canvas for power and a small anchor for brakes! Consult the charts, tidal guides and sailing directions and don’t be afraid to ask! You will find red “Visitor Mooring” buoys in various locations, these are removed annually over the winter and are well maintained and can cope with boats up to 20 tons (or more in settled weather).
    [Show full text]
  • Caithness County Council
    Caithness County Council RECORDS’ IDENTITY STATEMENT Reference number: CC Alternative reference number: Title: Caithness County Council Dates of creation: 1720-1975 Level of description: Fonds Extent: 10 bays of shelving Format: Mainly paper RECORDS’ CONTEXT Name of creators: Caithness County Council Administrative history: 1889-1930 County Councils were established under the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1889. They assumed the powers of the Commissioners of Supply, and of Parochial Boards, excluding those in Burghs, under the Public Health Acts. The County Councils also assumed the powers of the County Road Trusts, and as a consequence were obliged to appoint County Road Boards. Powers of the former Police Committees of the Commissioners were transferred to Standing Joint Committees, composed of County Councillors, Commissioners and the Sheriff of the county. They acted as the police committee of the counties - the executive bodies for the administration of police. The Act thus entrusted to the new County Councils most existing local government functions outwith the burghs except the poor law, education, mental health and licensing. Each county was divided into districts administered by a District Committee of County Councillors. Funded directly by the County Councils, the District Committees were responsible for roads, housing, water supply and public health. Nucleus: The Nuclear and Caithness Archive 1 Provision was also made for the creation of Special Districts to be responsible for the provision of services including water supply, drainage, lighting and scavenging. 1930-1975 The Local Government Act (Scotland) 1929 abolished the District Committees and Parish Councils and transferred their powers and duties to the County Councils and District Councils (see CC/6).
    [Show full text]
  • Layout 1 Copy
    STACK ROCK 2020 An illustrated guide to sea stack climbing in the UK & Ireland - Old Harry - - Old Man of Stoer - - Am Buachaille - - The Maiden - - The Old Man of Hoy - - over 200 more - Edition I - version 1 - 13th March 1994. Web Edition - version 1 - December 1996. Web Edition - version 2 - January 1998. Edition 2 - version 3 - January 2002. Edition 3 - version 1 - May 2019. Edition 4 - version 1 - January 2020. Compiler Chris Mellor, 4 Barnfield Avenue, Shirley, Croydon, Surrey, CR0 8SE. Tel: 0208 662 1176 – E-mail: [email protected]. Send in amendments, corrections and queries by e-mail. ISBN - 1-899098-05-4 Acknowledgements Denis Crampton for enduring several discussions in which the concept of this book was developed. Also Duncan Hornby for information on Dorset’s Old Harry stacks and Mick Fowler for much help with some of his southern and northern stack attacks. Mike Vetterlein contributed indirectly as have Rick Cummins of Rock Addiction, Rab Anderson and Bruce Kerr. Andy Long from Lerwick, Shetland. has contributed directly with a lot of the hard information about Shetland. Thanks are also due to Margaret of the Alpine Club library for assistance in looking up old journals. In late 1996 Ben Linton, Ed Lynch-Bell and Ian Brodrick undertook the mammoth scanning and OCR exercise needed to transfer the paper text back into computer form after the original electronic version was lost in a disk crash. This was done in order to create a world-wide web version of the guide. Mike Caine of the Manx Fell and Rock Club then helped with route information from his Manx climbing web site.
    [Show full text]
  • Orkney Greylag Goose Survey Report 2015
    The abundance and distribution of British Greylag Geese in Orkney, August 2015 A report by the Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust to Scottish Natural Heritage Carl Mitchell 1, Alan Leitch 2, & Eric Meek 3 November 2015 1 The Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust, Slimbridge, Gloucester, GL2 7BT 2 The Willows, Finstown, Orkney, KY17, 2EJ 3 Dashwood, 66 Main Street, Alford, Aberdeenshire, AB33 8AA 1 © The Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the copyright holder. This publication should be cited as: Mitchell, C., A.J. Leitch & E. Meek. 2015. The abundance and distribution of British Greylag Geese in Orkney, August 2015. Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust Report, Slimbridge. 16pp. Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust Slimbridge Gloucester GL2 7BT T 01453 891900 F 01453 890827 E [email protected] Reg. Charity no. 1030884 England & Wales, SC039410 Scotland 2 Contents Summary ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Methods ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Field counts ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Overtopping Hazard Reduction at Churchill Barriers, Scotland
    Overtopping hazard reduction at Churchill Barriers, Scotland Y ZHANG Supervisors: Prof. dr. ir. S.N. (Bas) Jonkman, TU Delft Dr.ir. Hofland. B, TU Delft Dr. ir. Bricker. J. D, TU Delft Ir. Marcel. Westerink, Antea Group Jan-Bert. de Hoop, Antea Group Delft University of Technology Department of Civil engineering and Geosciences, Hydraulic engineering Delft, 2019 i Preface This MSc thesis project is not only a conclusion of my Master study, but also a final harvest of my years of study. At 18 years old, I graduated from the best-grade high school in my hometown, where no weekend, no summer or winter break, and no holidays are allowed, where every student is required study in classroom from 7:00 to 22:00 every day, where 60 students sit in a small busy classroom breathing the foulest air ever. This experience makes me cherish my Bachelor and Master study life as well as its freedom more than anyone else. I appreciate SCU and TU Delft for giving me opportunity to learn knowledge and explore my interest while enjoying my youth. This thesis focuses providing technical advice on overtopping flood hazard reduction at Churchill Barriers. I am motivated to work on topic because it combines my interest in numerical model and risk analysis with passion for flood hazard reduction. To apply knowledge and theory I learned from lecture to a real case is not only interesting but also challenging. I spend plenty of effort to develop an approach that can lead to a solution of research question, which was revised ten of times while realizing it.
    [Show full text]
  • Wreck of the Edindoune (BF1118), Scapa Flow, Orkney. Final Report
    Wreck of the Edindoune (BF1118), Scapa Flow, Orkney. Final Report Submitted to: Historic Environment Scotland - Philip Robertson Contact: Kevin Heath SULA Diving Old Academy Stromness Orkney KW16 3AW Tel. 01856 850 285 E-mail. [email protected] Approved for release by M. Thomson (Director): Document history Version: State Prepared by: Date: 02 Final M. Thomson/K. Heath 26th March 2018 01 Draft M. Thomson/K. Heath 22nd March 2018 CONTENTS PAGE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………………………………………………………. ii SUMMARY………………......................................................................................................... iii 1. INTRODUCTION……………................................................................................................ 1 2. METHODS....................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Side scan sonar………………………………………………………………………………………………... 2 2.2 Diving……………………………………………………………………………………………….……………... 2 3. RESULTS.......................................................................................................................... 3 3.1 Side scan sonar...................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Diving………………….................................................................................................. 3 4. DISCUSSION.................................................................................................................... 17 REFERENCES & BIBLIOGRAPHY..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of Our Lighthouses and Lightships
    E-STORy-OF-OUR HTHOUSES'i AMLIGHTSHIPS BY. W DAMS BH THE STORY OF OUR LIGHTHOUSES LIGHTSHIPS Descriptive and Historical W. II. DAVENPORT ADAMS THOMAS NELSON AND SONS London, Edinburgh, and Nnv York I/K Contents. I. LIGHTHOUSES OF ANTIQUITY, ... ... ... ... 9 II. LIGHTHOUSE ADMINISTRATION, ... ... ... ... 31 III. GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OP LIGHTHOUSES, ... ... 39 IV. THE ILLUMINATING APPARATUS OF LIGHTHOUSES, ... ... 46 V. LIGHTHOUSES OF ENGLAND AND SCOTLAND DESCRIBED, ... 73 VI. LIGHTHOUSES OF IRELAND DESCRIBED, ... ... ... 255 VII. SOME FRENCH LIGHTHOUSES, ... ... ... ... 288 VIII. LIGHTHOUSES OF THE UNITED STATES, ... ... ... 309 IX. LIGHTHOUSES IN OUR COLONIES AND DEPENDENCIES, ... 319 X. FLOATING LIGHTS, OR LIGHTSHIPS, ... ... ... 339 XI. LANDMARKS, BEACONS, BUOYS, AND FOG-SIGNALS, ... 355 XII. LIFE IN THE LIGHTHOUSE, ... ... ... 374 LIGHTHOUSES. CHAPTER I. LIGHTHOUSES OF ANTIQUITY. T)OPULARLY, the lighthouse seems to be looked A upon as a modern invention, and if we con- sider it in its present form, completeness, and efficiency, we shall be justified in limiting its history to the last centuries but as soon as men to down two ; began go to the sea in ships, they must also have begun to ex- perience the need of beacons to guide them into secure channels, and warn them from hidden dangers, and the pressure of this need would be stronger in the night even than in the day. So soon as a want is man's invention hastens to it and strongly felt, supply ; we may be sure, therefore, that in the very earliest ages of civilization lights of some kind or other were introduced for the benefit of the mariner. It may very well be that these, at first, would be nothing more than fires kindled on wave-washed promontories, 10 LIGHTHOUSES OF ANTIQUITY.
    [Show full text]
  • Liddle's Quarry, Orkney: a Resource Evaluation and Assessment of Past and Possible Future Uses of Extracted Stone Minerals & Waste Programme Open Report OR/12/070
    Liddle's Quarry, Orkney: a resource evaluation and assessment of past and possible future uses of extracted stone Minerals & Waste Programme Open Report OR/12/070 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MINERALS & WASTE PROGRAMME OPEN REPORT OR/12/070 Liddle's Quarry, Orkney: a resource evaluation and The National Grid and other assessment of past and possible Ordnance Survey data © Crown Copyright and database rights 2012. Ordnance Survey Licence future uses of extracted stone No. 100021290. Keywords Liddle's Quarry, Orkney Islands, Martin R Gillespie and Emily A Tracey resource evaluation, sandstone, building stone, dimension stone, Stromness, Kirkwall. Front cover Stockpiled sandstone blocks in Liddle’s Quarry. Bibliographical reference GILLESPIE, M R AND TRACEY, E A. 2012. Liddle's Quarry, Orkney: a resource evaluation and assessment of past and possible future uses of extracted stone. British Geological Survey Internal Report, OR/12/070. 39pp. Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and/or the authority that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, e-mail [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract. Maps and diagrams in this book use topography based on Ordnance Survey mapping. © NERC 2012. All rights reserved Keyworth, Nottingham British Geological Survey 2012 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of our publications is available from BGS shops at British Geological Survey offices Nottingham, Edinburgh, London and Cardiff (Welsh publications only) see contact details below or shop online at www.geologyshop.com BGS Central Enquiries Desk Tel 0115 936 3143 Fax 0115 936 3276 The London Information Office also maintains a reference collection of BGS publications, including maps, for consultation.
    [Show full text]
  • Residential Property 1 Mansfield Cottages, Canisbay
    Residential Property 1 Mansfield Cottages, Canisbay The Property This two bedroom semi-detached bungalow is ideally situated in the tranquil village of Canisbay. The accommodation comprises of lounge, kitchen, two bedrooms, and bathroom. The property benefits from oil central heating and UPVC double glazing throughout . There is a tarred driveway offering off road parking for several vehicles leading to a detached garage offering power and light. The front and rear gardens are mainly laid with grass with a greenhouse to rear. The property commands panoramic views of the open countryside and a distant sea view, which is full of wildlife including deer, hawks, otters, puffins and many other birds. This property would make a beautiful family home. Ideal for buyers looking for a quiet rural haven. The Area Canisbay is a small scattered community with a nineteenth century church used occasionally by the Royal Family as it is not far from the Castle of Mey. It has a modern medical centre, youth hostel, village hall, church and primary school. Nearby John O' Groats is undoubtedly one of the best-known places in Scotland, and every year this North-East tip of Caithness sees a procession of "End -to-Enders" making the long journey to Land's End. John O' Groats itself is very much a focal point for tourism, and the village boasts one hotel and a guest house, a campsite, numerous B&B establishments and a number of craft shops and studios. As well as being a destination in its own right, it is also a springboard for trips across the Pentland Firth via the short sea crossing to Orkney.
    [Show full text]