DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliografii Semnificative

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliografii Semnificative 1969-2009 BIBLIOGRAFII SEMNIFICATIVE Dorina Gheorghe Valeriu Ioan-Franc INSTITUTUL NAÞIONAL DE CERCETÃRI ECONOMICE „COSTIN C. KIRIÞESCU” Centrul de Informareşă i Documentare Economic A C A D E M I A R O M Â N Ă INSTITUTUL NAŢIONAL DE CERCETĂRI ECONOMICE „COSTIN C. KIRIŢESCU” LAUREAŢII NOBEL ÎN ECONOMIE 1969-2009 BIBLIOGRAFII SEMNIFICATIVE Lucrare realizată în cadrul Programului de cercetare pe anul 2014, cod proiect 6.22.2 Dorina Gheorghe Valeriu Ioan-Franc ISBN: 978-973-159-176-6 Centrul de Informare şi Documentare Economică SUMAR 1969 .................................................................................................................................. 5 Ragnar Frisch............................................................................................................................5 Jan Tinbergen............................................................................................................................6 1970 .................................................................................................................................. 7 Paul A. Samuelson....................................................................................................................7 1971 ................................................................................................................................ 22 Simon Kuznets........................................................................................................................22 1972 ................................................................................................................................ 43 John R. Hicks..........................................................................................................................43 Kenneth J. Arrow....................................................................................................................45 1973 ................................................................................................................................ 53 Wassily Leontief.....................................................................................................................53 1974 ................................................................................................................................ 55 Gunnar Myrdal........................................................................................................................55 Friedrich August von Hayek...................................................................................................56 1975 ................................................................................................................................ 57 Leonid Vitaliyevich Kantorovich ...........................................................................................57 Tjalling C. Koopmans.............................................................................................................58 1976 ................................................................................................................................ 58 Milton Friedman .....................................................................................................................58 1977 ................................................................................................................................ 67 Bertil Ohlin .............................................................................................................................67 James E. Meade ......................................................................................................................68 1978 ................................................................................................................................ 68 Herbert A. Simon....................................................................................................................68 1979 ................................................................................................................................ 71 Theodore W. Schultz ..............................................................................................................71 Sir Arthur Lewis .....................................................................................................................74 1980 ................................................................................................................................ 75 Lawrence Robert Klein...........................................................................................................75 1981 ................................................................................................................................ 83 James Tobin ............................................................................................................................83 1982 ................................................................................................................................ 91 George J. Stigler .....................................................................................................................91 1983 ................................................................................................................................ 97 Gerard Debreu.........................................................................................................................97 1984 ................................................................................................................................ 98 Richard Stone..........................................................................................................................98 2 1985 .............................................................................................................................. 100 Franco Modigliani.................................................................................................................100 1986 .............................................................................................................................. 108 James M. Buchanan Jr. .........................................................................................................108 1987 .............................................................................................................................. 117 Robert M. Solow...................................................................................................................117 1988 .............................................................................................................................. 124 Maurice Allais.......................................................................................................................124 1989 .............................................................................................................................. 125 Trygve Haavelmo .................................................................................................................125 1990 .............................................................................................................................. 127 Harry M. Markowitz.............................................................................................................127 Merton H. Miller...................................................................................................................128 William F. Sharpe.................................................................................................................134 1991 .............................................................................................................................. 136 Ronald H. Coase ...................................................................................................................136 1992 .............................................................................................................................. 137 Gary S. Becker......................................................................................................................137 1993 .............................................................................................................................. 146 Robert W. Fogel....................................................................................................................146 Douglass C. North ................................................................................................................148 1994 .............................................................................................................................. 152 John C. Harsanyi...................................................................................................................152 John F. Nash Jr......................................................................................................................153 Reinhard Selten.....................................................................................................................154 1995 .............................................................................................................................. 161 Robert E. Lucas Jr.................................................................................................................161 1996 .............................................................................................................................. 168 James A. Mirrlees .................................................................................................................168
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 16Th SAET Conference on Current Trends in Economics IMPA, Rio De Janeiro, July 6 - 9, 2016
    WELCOME On behalf of the Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory, we are pleased to welcome you in Rio de Janeiro on the occasion of the 16th SAET Conference. We wish to express gratitude to the various institutions that made this conference possible: first and foremost, to Instituto Nacional de Matemática Pura e Aplicada (IMPA) for their wonderful hospitality, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), the University of Iowa, Itaú Bank and Bradesco Bank. Many thanks to the people who generously contributed to the success of this event, in particular, the members of the local organizing committee, the session organizers, the program committee and the help team. Special thanks to Suely Lima, Ana Paula Rodrigues, Leticia Ribas, Jurandira Ribas, Marcelo Viana, Michele Leite, Paula Dugin, Pedro Faro and Sonia Alves for their invaluable help along the progress, your help has been invaluable. We hope you enjoy the conference and we wish you a pleasant stay in Rio de Janeiro. Aloisio Araujo, José Heleno Faro, Juan Pablo Gama Torres, Susan Schommer and Nicholas Yannelis, Organizing Committee Executive Committee Bernard Cornet (President/Secretary) Robert Townsend (Second Vice-President) Nicholas Yannelis (Treasurer/Editor) Aloisio Araujo (Past President) David Levine (Member at Large) Charles Plott (Member at Large) Edward Prescott (Member at Large) Organizing
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Brochure
    CONFERENCE BROCHURE 22 June - 24 June, 2017 EDINBURGH, UNITED KINGDOM Week Schedule Time / Day Thursday 22 June Friday 23 June Saturday 24 June 08:00 - 09:00 Registration Registration Registration 09:00 - 10:30 Parallel Session 1 Parallel Session 5 Parallel Session 9 10:30 - 11:00 Tea and Coffee Tea and Coffee Tea and Coffee 11:00 - 12:30 Parallel Session 2 Parallel Session 6 Parallel Session 10 Lunch Lunch Lunch 12:30 - 13:45 Poster Session 1 Poster Session 2 Poster Session 3 13:45 15:15 Parallel Session 3 Parallel Session 7 Parallel Session 11 15:15 - 15:45 Tea and Coffee Tea and Coffee Tea and Coffee 15:45 - 17:15 Parallel Session 4 Parallel Session 8 Parallel Session 12 17:15 - 17:45 Short Break Short Break Short Break Plenary Talk Plenary Talk Plenary Talk 17:45 - 18:30 Erik Hurst Francesco Caselli Ayse Imrohoroglu Reception Gala Dinner Barbecue and Beer 19:00 - 23:00 Dynamic Earth Assembly Rooms Teviot Row House 2 Contents Map Page 4 Programme Chairs and Committee Page 5 Welcome Words Pages 6-7 Introduction to Edinburgh Pages 8-9 Practical Information Page 10 Social Events Page 11 Map of venues Page 12 Plenary Speakers Page 13 Poster Sessions Page 14 Thank you to our sponsors Page 15 Sessions Overview Page 16 Parallel Session Overview - Day 1 Page 17 Parallel Session Overview - Day 2 Page 18 Parallel Session Overview - Day 3 Page 19 Day 1 - Session Breakdown Page 20 Day 2 - Session Breakdown Page 38 Day 3 - Session Breakdown Page 57 3 Campus Maps George Square Lecture Theatre Plenary session & Registration Teviot Row House Lunches
    [Show full text]
  • The Language of Neoliberal Education Ed
    Letnik XXIX, številka 1–2, 2018 Revija za teorijo in raziskave vzgoje in izobraževanja Šolsko polje The Language of Neoliberal Education ed. Mitja Sardoč Šolsko polje Revija za teorijo in raziskave vzgoje in izobraževanja Letnik XXIX, številka 1–2, 2018 Šolsko polje je mednarodna revija za teorijo ter raziskave vzgoje in izobraževanja z mednarodnim uredniškim odbor om. Objavlja znanstvene in strokovne članke s širšega področja vzgoje in izobraževanja ter edukacij- skih raziskav (filozofija vzgoje, sociologija izobraževanja, uporabna epistemologija, razvojna psihologija, -pe dagogika, andragogika, pedagoška metodologija itd.), pregledne članke z omenjenih področij ter recenzije tako domačih kot tujih monografij s področja vzgoje in izobraževanja. Revija izhaja trikrat letno. Izdaja joSlo - vensko društvo raziskovalcev šolskega polja. Poglavitni namen revije je prispevati k razvoju edukacijskih ved in in- terdisciplinarnemu pristopu k teoretičnim in praktičnim vprašanjem vzgoje in izobraževanja. V tem okviru revija posebno pozornost namenja razvijanju slovenske znanstvene in strokovne terminologije ter konceptov na področju vzgoje in izobraževanja ter raziskovalnim paradigmam s področja edukacijskih raziskav v okvi- ru družboslovno-humanističnih ved. Uredništvo: Valerija Vendramin, Zdenko Kodelja, Darko Štrajn, Alenka Gril, Igor Ž. Žagar, Eva Klemenčič in Mitja Sardoč (vsi: Pedagoški inštitut, Ljubljana) Glavni urednik: Marjan Šimenc (Pedagoški inštitut, Ljubljana) Odgovorni urednik: Mitja Sardoč (Pedagoški inštitut, Ljubljana) Uredniški
    [Show full text]
  • Control of Finance As a Prerequisite for Successful Monetary Policy: a Reinterpretation of Henry Simons's “Rules Versus Auth
    Working Paper No. 713 Control of Finance as a Prerequisite for Successful Monetary Policy: A Reinterpretation of Henry Simons’s “Rules versus Authorities in Monetary Policy” by Thorvald Grung Moe* Norges Bank Levy Economics Institute of Bard College April 2012 * Thorvald Grung Moe is a senior adviser in the Financial Stability wing of Norges Bank (the central bank of Norway) and a visiting scholar at the Levy Economics Institute. The Levy Economics Institute Working Paper Collection presents research in progress by Levy Institute scholars and conference participants. The purpose of the series is to disseminate ideas to and elicit comments from academics and professionals. Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, founded in 1986, is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, independently funded research organization devoted to public service. Through scholarship and economic research it generates viable, effective public policy responses to important economic problems that profoundly affect the quality of life in the United States and abroad. Levy Economics Institute P.O. Box 5000 Annandale-on-Hudson, NY 12504-5000 http://www.levyinstitute.org Copyright © Levy Economics Institute 2012 All rights reserved ISSN 1547-366X ABSTRACT Henry Simons’s 1936 article “Rules versus Authorities in Monetary Policy” is a classical reference in the literature on central bank independence and rule-based policy. A closer reading of the article reveals a more nuanced policy prescription, with significant emphasis on the need to control short-term borrowing; bank credit is seen as highly unstable, and price level controls, in Simons’s view, are not be possible without limiting banks’ ability to create money by extending loans.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Thought of Henry Calvert Simons
    The Economic Thought of Henry Calvert Simons Drawing on years of research, Gerald Steele delves into the diverse ideas of Henry Simons, a neglected economist whose work in the 1930s on monetary and financial instability is extremely relevant to today’s debates about com- mercial bank credit, the interdependence of fiscal and monetary policy, and financial regulation. Steele describes the emergence of the first Chicago School of economics and its distinctive difference to the School subsequently associated with the Monetarism of Milton Friedman, and shows how Simons provides the basis for what is now referred to as ‘the fiscal theory of the price level’ and how this differs from the monetarist attempt to control prices by controlling the supply of broad money. This book will be of interest to advanced students and researchers of the history of economic thought, economic history, macroeconomics and bank- ing and finance. G.R. Steele is Reader in Economics at Lancaster University. His research interests include the economics and political philosophy of Friedrich Hayek, and he has pursued a general inquiry into the development of ideas relating to problems of a money economy. In 2007, he delivered the F.A. Hayek Memorial Lecture, Austrian Scholars Conference, Mises Institute. In 2010, he was Visiting Professor at the Univer- sity of Economics, Prague, when he delivered the František Čuhel Memorial Lecture, Conference on Political Economy, at the Cevro Institute. Routledge Studies in the History of Economics For a full list of titles in this
    [Show full text]
  • The Midway and Beyond: Recent Work on Economics at Chicago Douglas A
    The Midway and Beyond: Recent Work on Economics at Chicago Douglas A. Irwin Since its founding in 1892, the University of Chicago has been home to some of the world’s leading economists.1 Many of its faculty members have been an intellectual force in the economics profession and some have played a prominent role in public policy debates over the past half-cen- tury.2 Because of their impact on the profession and in­uence in policy Correspondence may be addressed to: Douglas Irwin, Department of Economics, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755; email: [email protected]. I am grateful to Dan Ham- mond, Steve Medema, David Mitch, Randy Kroszner, and Roy Weintraub for very helpful com- ments and advice; all errors, interpretations, and misinterpretations are solely my own. Disclo- sure: I was on the faculty of the then Graduate School of Business at the University of Chicago in the 1990s and a visiting professor at the Booth School of Business in the fall of 2017. 1. To take a crude measure, nearly a dozen economists who spent most of their career at Chicago have won the Nobel Prize, or, more accurately, the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Eco- nomic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel. The list includes Milton Friedman (1976), Theo- dore W. Schultz (1979), George J. Stigler (1982), Merton H. Miller (1990), Ronald H. Coase (1991), Gary S. Becker (1992), Robert W. Fogel (1993), Robert E. Lucas, Jr. (1995), James J. Heckman (2000), Eugene F. Fama and Lars Peter Hansen (2013), and Richard H. Thaler (2017). This list excludes Friedrich Hayek, who did his prize work at the London School of Economics and only spent a dozen years at Chicago.
    [Show full text]
  • Timothy J. Kehoe
    Doctor honoris causa TIMOTHY J. KEHOE Discurs llegit a la cerimònia d’investidura celebrada a la sala d’actes de l’edifici del Rectorat el dia 16 de març de l’any 2016 PRESENTACIÓ DE TIMOTHY J. KEHOE PER JORDI CABALLÉ Academic life tends to combine long periods of monotony, in which quiet but constant work is the rule, with isolated moments to celebrate your own or other people’s success as a result of that work. Today is one of those infrequent and, therefore, especially joyful times when we come together in celebration to honour one of the most prestigious members of our profession of academic economists. This is also an especially happy moment for me, as my friend Tim Kehoe has been a benchmark throughout my professional life. I will begin by highlighting some of the biographic aspects and abundant merits of Dr. Tim Kehoe. He is currently Professor of Eco- nomics at the University of Minnesota and Adviser to the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. He obtained his PhD from Yale Uni- versity in 1979, under the supervision of Professor Herbert Scarf and the co-supervision of Professor Andreu Mas-Colell. Since obtaining the PhD, he has lectured at the Wesleyan University, at the MIT, at the University of Cambridge and, since 1987, he has been a Pro- fessor at the University of Minnesota. Over this period, he has su- pervised 74 PhD theses. It should be stressed here that he is ranked 29th in the RePEC ranking of all academic economists worldwide as regards the subsequent research quality of his students.
    [Show full text]
  • Frontiers in Applied General Equilibrium Modeling in Honor of Herbert Scarf
    P1: Kcz CB757-FM CB757-Kehoe-v1.cls October 6, 2004 14:7 Frontiers in Applied General Equilibrium Modeling In Honor of Herbert Scarf Edited by TIMOTHY J. KEHOE University of Minnesota and Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis T. N. SRINIVASAN Yale University JOHN WHALLEY University of Western Ontario iii P1: Kcz CB757-FM CB757-Kehoe-v1.cls October 6, 2004 14:7 published by the press syndicate of the university of cambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom cambridge university press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, UK 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011-4211, USA 477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, VIC 3207, Australia Ruiz de Alarcon´ 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain Dock House, The Waterfront, Cape Town 8001, South Africa http://www.cambridge.org C Cambridge University Press 2005 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2005 Printed in the United States of America Typeface Times Roman PS 10/12.5 pt. System LATEX2ε [TB] A catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Frontiers in applied general equilibrium modeling / edited by Timothy J. Kehoe, T.N. Srinivasan, John Whalley. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-521-82525-3 (hardback) 1. Equilibrium (Economics) – Mathematical models. I. Kehoe, Timothy Jerome, 1953– II. Srinivasan, T.N., 1933– III. Whalley, John. HB145.F76 2005 339.5015195 – dc22 2004045758 ISBN 0 521 82525 3 hardback iv P1: Kcz CB757-FM CB757-Kehoe-v1.cls October 6, 2004 14:7 Contents List of Contributors page vii Acknowledgments xi Introduction 1 Timothy J.
    [Show full text]
  • Frontiers in Applied General Equilibrium Modeling
    P1: Kcz CB757-FM CB757-Kehoe-v1.cls October 13, 2004 10:9 This page intentionally left blank ii P1: Kcz CB757-FM CB757-Kehoe-v1.cls October 13, 2004 10:9 FRONTIERS IN APPLIED GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM MODELING This volume brings together fifteen papers by many of the most prominent applied general equilibrium modelers to honor Herbert Scarf, the father of equilibrium computation in economics. It deals with new developments in applied general equilibrium, a field that has broadened greatly since the 1980s. The contributors discuss some traditional as well as some newer topics in the field, including nonconvexities in economy-wide models, tax policy, developmental modeling, and energy modeling. The book also covers a range of new approaches, conceptual issues, and computational algorithms, such as calibration, and new areas of application, such as the macroeconomics of real business cycles and finance. An introductory chapter written by the editors maps out issues and scenarios for the future evolution of applied general equilibrium. Timothy J. Kehoe is Distinguished McKnight University Professor at the University of Minnesota and an advisor to the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. He has previ- ously taught at Wesleyan University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and the University of Cambridge. He has advised foreign firms and governments on the impact of their economic decisions. He is co-editor of Modeling North American Economic Integration, which examines the use of applied general equilibrium models to analyze the impact of the North American Free Trade Agreement. His current research focuses on the theory and application of general equilibrium models.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Frank Hyneman Knight, the Moral Philosopher 7 3
    To Kara, Andrew and Jim with love The Revival of Laissez-Faire in American Macroeconomic Theory A Case Study of the Pioneers Sherryl Davis Kasper Professor of Economics and Chair, Division of Social Sciences, Maryville College, Tennessee, USA Edward Elgar Cheltenham, UK • Northampton, MA, USA © Sherryl Davis Kasper 2002 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical or photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. Published by Edward Elgar Publishing Limited Glensanda House Montpellier Parade Cheltenham Glos GL50 lUA UK Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc. 136 West Street Suite 202 Northampton Massachusetts 01060 USA A catalog record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataioging in Publication Data Kasper, Sherryl Davis, 1952- The revival of laissez-faire in American macroeconomic theory: a case study of the pioneers/Sherryl Dayis Kasper. p.cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Free enterprise. 2. Macroeconomics. I. Title. HB95.K27 2002 339'.01-dc21 2002024583 ISBN 1 84064 606 3 Typeset by Cambrian Typesetters, Pr~y, Surrey 'Pnnted and bound in Great Britaili6ys'iddles Ltd, www.biddles.co.uk . -' .. Contents Acknowledgements vii 1. Introduction 1 2. Frank Hyneman Knight, the moral philosopher 7 3. Henry Calvert Simons, author of the blueprint 29 4. Friedrich von Hayek and the Austrian influence 46 5. Milton Friedman and monetarism 70 6. lames Buchanan and public choice theory 104 7. Robert E. Lucas, lr and new classical economics 127 8. Conclusion 144 References 153 Index 173 '.
    [Show full text]
  • INDIANA LAW REVIEW [Vol
    Income Tax as Implicit Insurance Against Losses from Terrorism Terrence Chorvat* Elizabeth Chorvat*' Abstract This Article examines the effects of the income tax rules as they relate to losses from terrorist attacks. It shows that the income tax system affords victims of terrorism a form of implicit insurance because the amount of tax owed decreases proportionately with the amount of the loss. The Article argues that the level of insurance should be greater for victims of terrorism than that provided to those who suffer other kinds of losses. Granting special tax benefits to victims of terrorist attacks provides behavioral incentives, not only for individuals and businesses who have suffered or might potentially suffer losses from terrorist attacks, but also for the government. The Article argues that, while the Victims of Terrorism Tax Relief Act of 2001 grants special tax benefits to victims of terrorism, this type of relief should be codified and should apply to all victims of terrorism against the United States, rather than granted on an ad hoc basis. Further, additional rules should be adopted which grant tax benefits to companies which provide insurance against terrorist attacks and favorable tax treatment should be given to expenses for the private provision of security against such attacks. Introduction This Article examines the public policy behind providing special tax benefits to the victims ofterrorism. The total losses from the September 1 1, 2001 attacks are estimated to exceed $50 billion dollars and over 3000 lives.' Therefore, how these losses are treated for tax purposes is a significant issue. This Article analyzes how the tax system currently treats these losses and how these rules can be improved.
    [Show full text]
  • Professional Economists and Policymaking in the United States, 1880-1929
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: IRRELEVANT GENIUS: PROFESSIONAL ECONOMISTS AND POLICYMAKING IN THE UNITED STATES, 1880-1929 Jonathan S. Franklin, Doctor of Philosophy, 2014 Dissertation Directed By: Professor David B. Sicilia, Department of History The rapid establishment and expansion of economics departments in colleges across the United State in the late nineteenth century indicates a significant shift in the way Americans understood economic science and its importance to federal economic policy. This dissertation addresses that phenomenon by explaining how American economists professionalized; and how that process influenced economic policymaking in the U.S. from the formation of the American Economic Association in 1885 to the Great Depression of the 1930s. Chapters alternate between analyzing the dilemmas economists faced while crafting a distinct academic discipline and investing early professional economists’ role in the federal economic policymaking process. Three emerging themes help explain the consistent failure of early U.S. economists to translate modern economic theory to economic policy in a timely fashion. First, public skepticism and the persistence of folk economics proved to be a powerful deterrent to professionally-trained economists’ authority in debates over policy matters. The combination of democratic idealism, populist politics, and skepticism regarding the motivations of professionally-trained economists undercut much of the social prestige professional economists garnered as educated elites. Second, disagreement among professional economists, often brought on by young economists’ efforts to overturn a century’s worth of received wisdom in classical economic theory, fostered considerable dissent within the field. Dissent, in turn, undermined the authority of professional economists and often led to doubt regarding economists’ abilities among the public and policy compromises that failed to solve economic problems.
    [Show full text]