Section Four

EUROPE THE FIRST GLOBAL AGE The Wives of Henry VIII Henry VIII of England married six women; his decision to divorce his first wife, Catherine of Aragon, when she could not produce a male heir, went against the ruling of the pope, and led to England’s break with Catholicism, and the establishment of the Church of England. 1500 CATHERINE OF ARAGON (1485–1536) ● Married Henry in 1509. ● Daughter of Ferdinand II and Isabella I of Castile. ● Ruled as regent between 1511–1514 while Henry was at war in France. ● Had six children; only one, Mary (b. 1516), survived. ● After she could have no more children, and therefore no male heirs, Henry asked Pope Clement VII to annul (cancel) the marriage. The pope refused. ● Henry married Anne Boleyn in 1533, despite the pope’s ruling, and had his marriage to Catherine annulled by the Archbishop of Canterbury. ANNE BOLEYN (1507–1536) 1510 ● Married Henry in January, 1533. ● In the 1520s, she was court attendant to Queen Mary, wife of Louis XII of France. ● In 1527, Henry began writing passionate letters to Anne declaring his love. ● In 1532, she came to Henry’s court with her older sister Mary, one of Henry’s mistresses. ● Gave birth to daughter Elizabeth, future Queen Elizabeth I, September 7, 1533. ● Accused of adultery in 1536, and imprisoned in the Tower of London. ● Tried on May 15 1536, found guilty, and condemned to death. 1520 JANE SEYMOUR (c. 1509–1537) ● Married Henry on May 30, 1536. ● Lady-in-waiting to Catherine of Aragon and Anne Boleyn. ● Met Henry for the first time on September 10, 1535; he fell in love with her, and sent her many presents. ● Died after giving birth to the king’s son Edward at Hampton Court Palace in 1537. ANNE OF CLEVES (1515–1557) ● Married Henry in January, 1540. 1530 ● Marriage never consummated and there were no children. It was annulled in July 1541. ● Anne stayed in England, supported financially by Henry, until her death in 1557. CATHERINE HOWARD (c. 1520–1542) ● Married Henry on July 28, 1540. ● Met Henry in 1539; the alliance was encouraged by opponents of Thomas Cromwell, who had arranged Henry’s marriage to Anne of Cleves. ● In 1541, accused of adultery with her music teacher, Henry Mannock, and her cousin, Thomas Culpeper. 1540 ● Charged with high treason, and beheaded in February 1542. CATHERINE PARR (1512–1548) ● Married Henry in 1543. ● When Henry proposed, Catherine was already engaged to Sir Thomas Seymour, brother of Jane Seymour. ● Catherine accepted the king’s proposal because she feared that if she refused her family would be punished. ● Catherine was a kind stepmother to Mary and Elizabeth. She acted as regent for Henry in 1544 when he was at the siege of Boulogne. ● After Henry’s death in 1547, Catherine married Thomas Seymour. She died in childbirth the following year. 1550 © Diagram Visual Information Ltd. Published by Facts On File, Inc. All electronic storage, reproduction, or transmittal is copyright protected by the publisher..

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Of Catherine Howard, Henry's Fifth Wife, and How, After Ordering Her
book 1, chapter 43 Of Catherine Howard, Henry’s Fifth Wife, and How, after Ordering Her Put to Death, He Married Katherine Parr1 Within eight days, the king married Catherine Howard, the duke of Norfolk’s niece (his brother’s daughter).2 But though the king was pleased beyond mea- sure with his new bride, that did not stop him from inflicting his cruelty on Catholics. Thus, on July 30, he put to death three saintly doctors of theology for having defended the cause of Queen Doña Catherine and for now denying the king’s pontifical power. Alongside them he condemned three Zwinglian heretics, ordering that they be paraded two by two, a Catholic together with a heretic, as a blacker mockery of religion and a worse torment to the Catholics, who received more pain from this awful company than from their own deaths. When a knight of the king’s household saw them borne off to death, com- panioned in this manner, and learned that some were condemned for being Catholics and the others for not being so, he said, “On this account I will take care henceforth to be of the king’s religion—that is to say, none at all!”3 Then, on August 2, he also dispatched the prior of Doncaster with three other monks and two laymen, on the same grounds, as well as for refusing to acknowledge the royal supremacy.4 1 Sander, De origine ac progressu, 214–19. 2 Henry and Catherine were married on June 28, 1540, several weeks after the finalization of the divorce from Anne.
[Show full text]
D'elboux Manuscripts
D’Elboux Manuscripts © B J White, December 2001 Indexed Abstracts page 63 of 156 774. Halsted (59-5-r2c10) • Joseph ASHE of Twickenham, in 1660 • arms. HARRIS under Bradbourne, Sevenoaks • James ASHE of Twickenham, d1733 =, d. Edmund BOWYER of Richmond Park • Joseph WINDHAM = ……, od. James ASHE 775. Halsted (59-5-r2c11) • Thomas BOURCHIER of Canterbury & Halstead, d1486 • Thomas BOURCHIER the younger, kinsman of Thomas • William PETLEY of Halstead, d1528, 2s. Richard = Alyce BOURCHIER, descendant of Thomas BOURCHIER the younger • Thomas HOLT of London, d1761 776. Halsted (59-5-r2c12) • William WINDHAM of Fellbrigge in Norfolk, m1669 (London licence) = Katherine A, d. Joseph ASHE 777. Halsted (59-5-r3c03) • Thomas HOLT of London, d1761, s. Thomas HOLT otp • arms. HOLT of Lancashire • John SARGENT of Halstead Place, d1791 = Rosamund, d1792 • arms. SARGENT of Gloucestershire or Staffordshire, CHAMBER • MAN family of Halstead Place • Henry Stae MAN, d1848 = Caroline Louisa, d1878, d. E FOWLE of Crabtree in Kent • George Arnold ARNOLD = Mary Ann, z1760, d1858 • arms. ROSSCARROCK of Cornwall • John ATKINS = Sarah, d1802 • arms. ADAMS 778. Halsted (59-5-r3c04) • James ASHE of Twickenham, d1733 = ……, d. Edmund BOWYER of Richmond Park • Joseph WINDHAM = ……, od. James ASHE • George Arnold ARNOLD, d1805 • James CAZALET, d1855 = Marianne, d1859, d. George Arnold ARNOLD 779. Ham (57-4-r1c06) • Edward BUNCE otp, z1684, d1750 = Anne, z1701, d1749 • Anne & Jane, ch. Edward & Anne BUNCE • Margaret BUNCE otp, z1691, d1728 • Thomas BUNCE otp, z1651, d1716 = Mary, z1660, d1726 • Thomas FAGG, z1683, d1748 = Lydia • Lydia, z1735, d1737, d. Thomas & Lydia FAGG 780. Ham (57-4-r1c07) • Thomas TURNER • Nicholas CARTER in 1759 781.
[Show full text]
Henry Viii and His Six Wives
HENRY VIII AND HIS SIX WIVES King Henry the Eighth of England was famous for many things, but he was also famous because he had six wives. He was not a kind husband. People say that when he was looking for a new wife, careful fathers took their daughters away from the palace. They did not want the King to choose their daughter to be the next Queen, because some of his Queens had very short and unhappy lives. Why did King Henry divorce two wives, and kill two others? What were his queens really like? Catherine Parr, the sixth wife, lived on after the King's death. One day she goes back to the palace of Whitehall and finds a box of old letters written to the King — one from each of the first five wives. She sits down to read them to her young maid, Margaret. The first letter is from the daughter of the King of Spain, Katherine of Aragon, who was Henry's wife for twenty-four years. She died alone and sad and friendless . Y LIBRAR S BOOKWORM D OXFOR True Stories Henry VIII and his Six Wives ) headwords 0 (70 2 e Stag t Basset r Jennife : Editor s Serie Founder Editor: Tricia Hedge Activities Editors: Jennifer Bassett and Alison Baxter JANET HARDY-GOULD I VII y Henr and his Six Wives S PRES Y UNIVERSIT D OXFOR OXFORD S PRES Y UNIVERSIT Great Clarendon Street, Oxford 0x2 6DP CONTENTS STORY INTRODUCTION i 1 King Henry is dead 1 2 Katherine of Aragon 6 OXFORD and OXFORD ENGLISH are registered trade marks of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries n Boley e Ann 3 11 8 200 s Pres y Universit d Oxfor © n editio s Thi The
[Show full text]
The Six Wives of Henry VIII Ebook Free Download
THE SIX WIVES OF HENRY VIII PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Alison Weir | 656 pages | 03 Jan 2008 | Vintage Publishing | 9780099523628 | English | London, United Kingdom The Six Wives of Henry VIII PDF Book Despite unconvincing evidence, she was found guilty and beheaded on 19 May for adultery, incest, and high treason. Henry took the throne in , at age Henry, at the time a Roman Catholic, sought the Pope's approval for an annulment on the grounds that Catherine had first been his brother's wife. Her pre-contract of marriage with Francis I, Duke of Lorraine , was cited as grounds for annulment, even though their marriage did not proceed. She was dark-haired with beautiful features and lively manners; she was educated in Europe, largely as a lady-in-waiting to Queen Claude of France. Thomas Cromwell 3 episodes, Retrieved 21 June In , Henry and Anne went through a secret wedding service. Rick Wakeman. Mary Clifford [23] [24]. Lady Rochford 3 episodes, Mother of King Edward VI. Color: Color. Subscription or UK public library membership required. Main article: Anne of Cleves. Several of Henry's wives worked in service to another wife, typically as a lady-in-waiting. Clement Cotteril Scholefield arr. AMLH Her badge was granted by the king, it combined the Tudor rose badge of Henry with a previous one used by the Queen's family. Anne Boleyn 2 episodes, Daniel Moynihan Rate This. Following the album's release on 23 January , [23] it topped the album charts in four countries. While recording "Anne Boleyn", a dream Wakeman had about attending her execution caused him to include a version of " St.
[Show full text]
Culpeper/Culpepper/Colepepper
COLEPEPER/CULPEPER/CULPEPPER HISTORY AND ANCESTRAL CONNECTIONS (and the beginning of the Culpepper lines in America via Virginia and including the Culpepper lineage of Lady Diana Frances Spencer.) ******** ******** CULPEPER LINEAGE (compiled by Warren Culpepper and Lew Griffin; edited and additional material by Barbara Lee Rowe) This lineage chart covers the ancestral heritage down to the family of Barbara Lee Rowe) John de Colepeper b. ca. 1140, Bay Hall, Pembury, Kent, England Sir Thomas de Colepeper the Recognitor b. ca. 1170 was Recognitor of the Grand Assize. The Grand Assize was a judicial proceeding or inquiry, and the Recognitors, who were summoned on such a tribunal, were the jurors. Their function was to investigate all cases involving questions of right. As Recognitors were probably neighbors of the disputing parties, they were bound to "recognize" and speak the truth concerning the matter at issue.1 John Colepeper b. ca. 1200, son of Sir Thomas de Colepeper. Sir Thomas Colepeper of Brenchley and Bayhall b. ca. 1230, son of John Colepeper. If the pedigrees are correct then this Sir Thomas, of Bayhall, must have been an old man in 4 Edward II or 1310 (Note: the date convention used here is "regnal" dating in which the year is the number of years into the reign of the current monarch. Thus 4 Edward II would be the 4th year of the reign of King Edward II). Assuming that the grandfather was fifty years of age when he served as Recognitor, then the two generations succeeding him must have covered a period of some eighty years.
[Show full text]
Line to Boleyn Sir Giles Overbury Wife Anne Sherley Daughter of Sir John Sherley 1569
Line to Boleyn Sir Giles Overbury wife Anne Sherley daughter of Sir John sherley 1569 - 1631 son of Thomas Shurley (my 11th Great-Grandparents) wife Anne Pelham 2nd cousin of Queen Elizabeth I (QE 1st is my 2nd cousin 13 times removed) Daughter of Sir Nicholas Pelham of Laughton, East Sussex wife Anne Sackville 1st cousin of Anne Boleyn (Anne Boleyn is 1st cousin 14 times removed) Daughter of John Sackville of Withyham and Dhiddingly, Sussex wife Margaret Boleyn daughter of Sir William Boleyn (1451 – 10 October 1505) Grandfather of Anne Boleyn, and Great-Grandfather of Queen Elizabeth I, and 14th Great-Grandfather of David Arthur ------------------- ------------------- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Shurley_(died_1631) Sir John Shurley (1568 – 25 April 1631) was an English politician who sat in the House of Commons in 1625. Shurley was the son of Thomas Shurley of Isfield, Sussex, by his first wife Anne Pelham, daughter of Sir Nicholas Pelham of Laughton, East Sussex; and great-grandson of John Shurley (died 1527) who held the office of Cofferer to King Henry VIII. Sir George Shurley, Lord Chief Justice of Ireland, was his younger brother. He matriculated on entry to Hart Hall, Oxford on 22 June 1582, aged 14. He was a student of the Middle Temple in 1591. He succeeded his father in 1579 and was knighted on 11 May 1603. In 1593 he was elected MP for East Grinstead, in 1597 for Steyning and in 1604 for Bramber. He was appointed High Sheriff of Surrey and Sussex for 1616–17. In 1625, he was elected Member of Parliament for Sussex.[1] Shurley died at Lewes at the age of about 62.[1] He had married firstly his cousin Jane Shurley, and secondly Dorothy Goring.
[Show full text]
King Henry VIII Remembered As One of the Most Famous Monarchs in History, Henry VIII Is Probably Most Known for His Many Wives and His Incredibly Bad Temper
King Henry VIII Remembered as one of the most famous monarchs in history, Henry VIII is probably most known for his many wives and his incredibly bad temper. In fact, Henry’s legacy consists of much more than this, including significant changes in England and across Europe: many of which have influenced the world around us today. Childhood Henry was born on 28th June 1491 in Greenwich, London. He was the second son born to King Henry VII and Elizabeth of York. He was said to be very handsome and athletic in his youth. His older brother, Arthur, was born five years earlier and therefore Henry was second in line to the English throne. In total, Henry had six siblings, though sadly only three survived past infancy. As well as a brother, Henry had two sisters; Margaret, who was two years older, and Mary, who was born five years after Henry. In 1502, Arthur fell ill and died aged only 15, possibly from sweating sickness. This meant that Henry, at only ten years old, was now in line as the next King of England. His father kept him under strict supervision and he had very little training as to what a king’s role involved. Early reign Henry VII died on 21st April 1509, leaving 17-year-old Henry as his successor. Henry decided soon after that he would marry his brother’s widow, Catherine of Aragon. Henry and Catherine were married on 11th June 1509. They had a number of children who were sadly stillborn before their daughter Mary was born in 1516.
[Show full text]
Viewed As a Threat to Himself and to the Crown
! MIAMI UNIVERSITY The Graduate School Certificate for Approving the Dissertation We hereby approve the Dissertation of Sarah Elizabeth Donelson Candidate for the Degree: Doctor of Philosophy _______________________________________ Director Dr. Judith P. Zinsser ______________________________________ Reader Dr. Renee Baernstein _______________________________________ Reader Dr. Charlotte Goldy ______________________________________ Reader Dr. Stephen Norris _______________________________________ Graduate School Representative Dr. Katharine Gillespie ! ! ABSTRACT BY NO ORDINARY PROCESS: TREASON, GENDER, AND POLITICS UNDER HENRY VIII by Sarah Elizabeth Donelson Using the treason statute of 1534 and the Pole/Courtenay treason case of 1538, I explore how the intersection of treason, gender, and personal politics subverted and then changed the gender paradigm for traitors in the sixteenth century. The Poles and Courtenays were descended from the Plantagenets, the ruling dynasty in England before the Tudors, and as such were a threat to Henry VIII and the stability of his throne. After one member of the Pole family, Cardinal Reginald Pole, was declared a traitor by the king, Henry VIII and his principal minister, Thomas Cromwell, embarked upon an investigation of his family and friends. What they found convinced them that these two families were guilty of high treason and planning to replace him on the throne. The Pole/ Courtenay case shows the instability of customary gender assumptions both in English politics and the legislation and prosecution of treason. Though the process of the investigation, prosecution, and sentencing, the state changed what it meant to be a traitor in terms of gender. ! ! BY NO ORDINARY PROCESS: TREASON, GENDER, AND POLITICS UNDER HENRY VIII A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History by Sarah Elizabeth Donelson Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2012 Dissertation Director: Dr.
[Show full text]
Jane Parker Was Born Sometime During 1504 Or 1505 to Henry Parker, Lord Morley, and His Wife, Alice St
Jane Parker was born sometime during 1504 or 1505 to Henry Parker, Lord Morley, and his wife, Alice St. John. Most historians have placed her early years in Great Hallingbury, but recent scholarship suggests that Jane was much older by the time her family came into possession of the manor there, and she more likely spent her childhood at another of Morley’s Essex properties. In addition to Jane, Henry and Alice Parker had at least four other children: Henry, Margaret, Francis, and Elizabeth. Jane’s first official appearance at court is recorded in March 1522 when she portrayed the womanly virtue of Constancy during the Shrovetide festivities. Her future sisters-in-law, Anne and Mary Boleyn performed in the pageant as well, taking on the roles of Perseverance and Kindness, respectively. Historian, Julia Fox, speculates that Jane joined the service of Katherine of Aragon much earlier and that the Mistress Parker noted as attending the queen at the Field of Cloth of Gold in June 1520 was her. Marriage negotiations between Jane’s father and Thomas Boleyn began at some point before October 4, 1524 when they signed the jointure for her marriage to Thomas’ son, George. This was an ideal match. George was the sole heir of an affluent family on the rise. Like the Morleys, the Boleyns prized education and intellectual pursuits and, by all accounts, George was clever, witty, and charming. He was also highly intelligent and creative, going on to produce remarkable poetry and several translations. The king favored the union, contributing half of the staggering 2,000-mark jointure and gifting the couple with the manor of Grimstone.
[Show full text]
The Mid-Tudor Market in Crown Land in Kent
http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society THE MID-TUDOR MARKET IN CROWN LAND IN KENT MICHAEL L. ZELL There had always been a Crown estate in Kent. As in many other English counties, lands had come and gone: estates fell to the Crown through the fifteenth-century Acts of Resumption, from the attainders of political foes and by escheat for lack of male heirs. The process was then reversed as monarchs granted out lands to political supporters, hard-working officials and royal wives. The royal estate was thus not a permanent set of lands, but a constantly changing collection of estates whose function was as much political as it was economic. At the beginning of the sixteenth century the Crown lands in Kent were not very extensive, but in 1521 they were enlarged significantly by the fall of the Duke of Buckingham. The Stafford estates were spread across England and Wales, including a large concentration in and around Tonbridge. But these new additions to the Crown estate in Kent were treated in the traditional manner: many were soon granted out to successful councillors and courtiers, notably the Boleyns and the Guildfords.1 The Stafford estates proved to be just a small foretaste of what was to come. From 1536 to 1554 - and beyond - a veritable mountain of new estates passed into the hands of the English government, and Kent 1 Buckingham's lands in Kent included the lordships or manors of Tonbridge, Southborough, Hilden, Brasted, Yalding, Penshurst and Bayhall: an extremely low valuation puts the total at £265 per annum: Public Record Office (hereafter PRO) E 36/150 fo.
[Show full text]
Women of the Tudor Court, 1501-1568
Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 1989 Women of the Tudor court, 1501-1568 Carol De Witte Bowles Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Courts Commons, European History Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Bowles, Carol De Witte, "Women of the Tudor court, 1501-1568" (1989). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 3874. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.5759 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Carol De Witte Bowles for the Master of Arts in History presented May 11, 1989. Title: Women of the Tudor Court, 1501-1568 APPROVED BY MEMBERS OF THE THESIS COMMITTEE: Ann Weikel Susan Karant-Nunn \."· Charles LeGuin Marjorie Writing the history of Tudor women is a difficult task. "Women's lives from the 16th century can rarely be constructed except when these women have had influential connections with notable men. 11 1 This is no less true for 1Minna F. Weinstein, "Reconstructing Our Past: Reflections on Tudor Women," International Journal of Women's Studies 1 (1978), p. 133. 2 the court women of Tudor England than for other women of the time. The purpose of this thesis is to discuss some of the more memorable court women of Tudor England who served the queens of Henry VIII, Mary I, and Elizabeth I, 2 and to determine what impact, if any, they had on their contemporary times and to evaluate their roles in Tudor history.
[Show full text]
359 Television Series Reviews Laws and Customs [Castilla Será La Suma
Television Series Reviews 359 laws and customs [Castilla será la suma de sus regiones, no la anulación de las mismas, despreciando sus fueros ni costumbres].” It is a promise that speaks to the concerns of the series’ 2012 Catalan viewers. Still, the eponymous Isabel is first and foremost about the queen of Castile and her Castilian subjects. When advised to wait for Fernando’s return to Castile before proclaiming herself queen, she states categorically, “He may rule in Aragon, but in Castile, it is I who rule [Él mandará en Aragón, pero quien manda en Castilla soy yo].” However, in light of the Catalonian indepen- dence movement that heated up just as the filming of the series commenced, the weight given to each of that sentence’s two independent clauses could well depend on one’s views of the autonomy’s political status and the future unity of the Spanish nation. Surely the series’ Catalan producers and direc- tor, as well as TVE, were aware of that ambiguity. Whether they intended it as a conciliatory move is more difficult to determine. Barbara F . Weissberger University of Minnesota The Tudors: The Showtime Series The Tudors (2007–2010) Showtime Series, written by Michael Hirst, offered an unrealistic view of the court of Henry VIII (Jonathan Rhys Meyers). His courtiers frequently gathered together, partying with music, dancing, and card playing. Henry joined them, sometimes eating alone amid the revelry, although the real king usually ate privately in his privy chamber. In this fantasy world of the royal family, the women appeared mostly slim and beautiful, the English wives, for example, wearing long, low-cut dresses that fell provocatively around their shapely bodies.
[Show full text]