Determination of Trophic Relationships Within a High Arctic Marine Food Web Using 613C and 615~ Analysis *
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
7.014 Handout PRODUCTIVITY: the “METABOLISM” of ECOSYSTEMS
7.014 Handout PRODUCTIVITY: THE “METABOLISM” OF ECOSYSTEMS Ecologists use the term “productivity” to refer to the process through which an assemblage of organisms (e.g. a trophic level or ecosystem assimilates carbon. Primary producers (autotrophs) do this through photosynthesis; Secondary producers (heterotrophs) do it through the assimilation of the organic carbon in their food. Remember that all organic carbon in the food web is ultimately derived from primary production. DEFINITIONS Primary Productivity: Rate of conversion of CO2 to organic carbon (photosynthesis) per unit surface area of the earth, expressed either in terns of weight of carbon, or the equivalent calories e.g., g C m-2 year-1 Kcal m-2 year-1 Primary Production: Same as primary productivity, but usually expressed for a whole ecosystem e.g., tons year-1 for a lake, cornfield, forest, etc. NET vs. GROSS: For plants: Some of the organic carbon generated in plants through photosynthesis (using solar energy) is oxidized back to CO2 (releasing energy) through the respiration of the plants – RA. Gross Primary Production: (GPP) = Total amount of CO2 reduced to organic carbon by the plants per unit time Autotrophic Respiration: (RA) = Total amount of organic carbon that is respired (oxidized to CO2) by plants per unit time Net Primary Production (NPP) = GPP – RA The amount of organic carbon produced by plants that is not consumed by their own respiration. It is the increase in the plant biomass in the absence of herbivores. For an entire ecosystem: Some of the NPP of the plants is consumed (and respired) by herbivores and decomposers and oxidized back to CO2 (RH). -
Boreogadus Saida) and Safron Cod (Eleginus Gracilis) Early Life Stages in the Pacifc Arctic
Polar Biology https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-019-02494-4 ORIGINAL PAPER Spatio‑temporal distribution of polar cod (Boreogadus saida) and safron cod (Eleginus gracilis) early life stages in the Pacifc Arctic Cathleen D. Vestfals1 · Franz J. Mueter2 · Janet T. Dufy‑Anderson3 · Morgan S. Busby3 · Alex De Robertis3 Received: 24 September 2018 / Revised: 15 March 2019 / Accepted: 18 March 2019 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Polar cod (Boreogadus saida) and safron cod (Eleginus gracilis) are key fshes in the Arctic marine ecosystem, serving as important trophic links between plankton and apex predators, yet our understanding of their life histories in Alaska’s Arctic is extremely limited. To improve our knowledge about their early life stages (ELS), we described the spatial and temporal distributions of prefexion larvae to late juveniles (to 65 mm in length) in the Chukchi and western Beaufort seas based on surveys conducted between 2004 and 2013, and examined how their abundances varied in response to environmental factors. Species-specifc diferences in habitat use were found, with polar cod having a more ofshore and northern distribution than safron cod, which were found closer inshore and farther south. Polar cod prefexion and fexion larvae were encountered throughout the sampling season across much of the shelf, which suggests that spawning occurs over several months and at multiple locations, with Barrow Canyon potentially serving as an important spawning and/or retention area. Polar cod ELS were abundant at intermediate temperatures (5.0–6.0 °C), while safron cod were most abundant at the highest temperatures, which suggests that safron cod may beneft from a warming Arctic, while polar cod may be adversely afected. -
The Minke Whale
Status of Marine Mammals in the North Atlantic THE MINKE WHALE This series of reports is intended to provide information on North Atlantic marine mammals suitable for the general reader. Reports are produced on species that have been considered by the NAMMCO Scientific Committee, and therefore reflect the views of the Council and Scientific Committee of NAMMCO. North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission Polar Environmental Centre N-9296 Tromsø, Norway Tel.: +47 77 75 01 80, Fax: +47 77 75 01 81 Email: [email protected], Web site: www.nammco.no MINKE WHALE (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) The minke whale is the smallest of the balaenopterids, or rorquals. It attains a length of 8-9 m and a weight of about 8 tonnes in the North Atlantic. As with all balaenopterids, the females are somewhat larger than the males. Minke whales are black or dark grey dorsally and white on the ventral side. A transverse white band is charachteristic for the species in the Northern Hemisphere. With a worldwide distribution, it is the most common of the rorquals. Distribution and Stock Definition: The minke whale is found throughout most of the North Atlantic, but is generally more common in coastal or shelf areas (Fig. 1). Although the migratory patterns of North Atlantic minke whales are not known, they tend to occupy higher latitudes in the summer and lower latitudes in the winter. Breeding and calving areas are not known. North Atlantic minke whales have been divided into four management stocks by the International Whaling Commission (IWC) (Donovan 1991) (See Fig. 1). The original stock divisions were not based on extensive biological information. -
Lesson Overview from There Depends on Who Eats Whom! 3.3 Energy Flow in Ecosystems
THINK ABOUT IT What happens to energy stored in body tissues when one organism eats another? Energy moves from the “eaten” to the “eater.” Where it goes Lesson Overview from there depends on who eats whom! 3.3 Energy Flow in Ecosystems Food Chains A food chain is a series of steps in which organisms transfer energy by eating and being eaten. Food chains can vary in length. An example from the Everglades is shown. Food Chains Food Chains In some aquatic food chains, such as the example shown, Larger fishes, like the largemouth bass, eat the small fishes. primary producers are a mixture of floating algae called The bass are preyed upon by large wading birds, such as the phytoplankton and attached algae. These producers are anhinga, which may ultimately be eaten by an alligator. eaten by small fishes, such as flagfish. Food Chains Food Webs There are four steps in this food chain. In most ecosystems, feeding relationships are much more The top carnivore is four steps removed from the primary complicated than the relationships described in a single, simple producer. chain because many animals eat more than one kind of food. Ecologists call this network of feeding interactions a food web. An example of a food web in the Everglades is shown. Food Chains Within Food Webs Decomposers & Detritivores in Food Webs Each path through a food web is a food chain. Most producers die without being eaten. In the detritus A food web, like the one shown, links all of the food chains in an pathway, decomposers convert that dead material to detritus, ecosystem together. -
Trophic Levels
Trophic Levels Douglas Wilkin, Ph.D. Jean Brainard, Ph.D. Say Thanks to the Authors Click http://www.ck12.org/saythanks (No sign in required) AUTHORS Douglas Wilkin, Ph.D. To access a customizable version of this book, as well as other Jean Brainard, Ph.D. interactive content, visit www.ck12.org CK-12 Foundation is a non-profit organization with a mission to reduce the cost of textbook materials for the K-12 market both in the U.S. and worldwide. Using an open-content, web-based collaborative model termed the FlexBook®, CK-12 intends to pioneer the generation and distribution of high-quality educational content that will serve both as core text as well as provide an adaptive environment for learning, powered through the FlexBook Platform®. Copyright © 2015 CK-12 Foundation, www.ck12.org The names “CK-12” and “CK12” and associated logos and the terms “FlexBook®” and “FlexBook Platform®” (collectively “CK-12 Marks”) are trademarks and service marks of CK-12 Foundation and are protected by federal, state, and international laws. Any form of reproduction of this book in any format or medium, in whole or in sections must include the referral attribution link http://www.ck12.org/saythanks (placed in a visible location) in addition to the following terms. Except as otherwise noted, all CK-12 Content (including CK-12 Curriculum Material) is made available to Users in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc/3.0/), as amended and updated by Creative Com- mons from time to time (the “CC License”), which is incorporated herein by this reference. -
Structure of Tropical River Food Webs Revealed by Stable Isotope Ratios
OIKOS 96: 46–55, 2002 Structure of tropical river food webs revealed by stable isotope ratios David B. Jepsen and Kirk O. Winemiller Jepsen, D. B. and Winemiller, K. O. 2002. Structure of tropical river food webs revealed by stable isotope ratios. – Oikos 96: 46–55. Fish assemblages in tropical river food webs are characterized by high taxonomic diversity, diverse foraging modes, omnivory, and an abundance of detritivores. Feeding links are complex and modified by hydrologic seasonality and system productivity. These properties make it difficult to generalize about feeding relation- ships and to identify dominant linkages of energy flow. We analyzed the stable carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios of 276 fishes and other food web components living in four Venezuelan rivers that differed in basal food resources to determine 1) whether fish trophic guilds integrated food resources in a predictable fashion, thereby providing similar trophic resolution as individual species, 2) whether food chain length differed with system productivity, and 3) how omnivory and detritivory influenced trophic structure within these food webs. Fishes were grouped into four trophic guilds (herbivores, detritivores/algivores, omnivores, piscivores) based on literature reports and external morphological characteristics. Results of discriminant function analyses showed that isotope data were effective at reclassifying individual fish into their pre-identified trophic category. Nutrient-poor, black-water rivers showed greater compartmentalization in isotope values than more productive rivers, leading to greater reclassification success. In three out of four food webs, omnivores were more often misclassified than other trophic groups, reflecting the diverse food sources they assimilated. When fish d15N values were used to estimate species position in the trophic hierarchy, top piscivores in nutrient-poor rivers had higher trophic positions than those in more productive rivers. -
Ecology (Pyramids, Biomagnification, & Succession
ENERGY PYRAMIDS & Freshmen Biology FOOD CHAINS/FOOD WEBS May 4 – May 8 Lecture ENERGY FLOW •Energy → powers life’s processes •Energy = ATP! •Flow of energy determines the system’s ability to sustain life FEEDING RELATIONSHIPS • Energy flows through an ecosystem in one direction • Sun → autotrophs (producers) → heterotrophs (consumers) FOOD CHAIN VS. FOOD WEB FOOD CHAINS • Energy stored by producers → passed through an ecosystem by a food chain • Food chain = series of steps in which organisms transfer energy by eating and being eaten FOOD WEBS •Feeding relationships are more complex than can be shown in a food chain •Food Web = network of complex interactions •Food webs link all the food chains in an ecosystem together ECOLOGICAL PYRAMIDS • Used to show the relationships in Ecosystems • There are different types: • Energy Pyramid • Biomass Pyramid • Pyramid of numbers ENERGY PYRAMID • Only part of the energy that is stored in one trophic level can be passed on to the next level • Much of the energy that is consumed is used for the basic functions of life (breathing, moving, reproducing) • Only 10% is used to produce more biomass (10 % moves on) • This is what can be obtained from the next trophic level • All of the other energy is lost 10% RULE • Only 10% of energy (from organisms) at one trophic level → the next level • EX: only 10% of energy/calories from grasses is available to cows • WHY? • Energy used for bodily processes (growth/development and repair) • Energy given off as heat • Energy used for daily functioning/movement • Only 10% of energy you take in should be going to your actual biomass/weight which another organism could eat BIOMASS PYRAMID • Total amount of living tissue within a given trophic level = biomass • Represents the amount of potential food available for each trophic level in an ecosystem PYRAMID OF NUMBERS •Based on the number of individuals at each trophic level. -
Complete Mitochondrial Genome Sequences of the Arctic Ocean Codwshes Arctogadus Glacialis and Boreogadus Saida Reveal Oril and Trna Gene Duplications
Polar Biol (2008) 31:1245–1252 DOI 10.1007/s00300-008-0463-7 ORIGINAL PAPER Complete mitochondrial genome sequences of the Arctic Ocean codWshes Arctogadus glacialis and Boreogadus saida reveal oriL and tRNA gene duplications Ragna Breines · Anita Ursvik · Marianne Nymark · Steinar D. Johansen · Dag H. Coucheron Received: 4 December 2007 / Revised: 16 April 2008 / Accepted: 5 May 2008 / Published online: 27 May 2008 © The Author(s) 2008 Abstract We have determined the complete mitochon- Introduction drial genome sequences of the codWshes Arctogadus gla- cialis and Boreogadus saida (Order Gadiformes, Family More than 375 complete sequenced mitochondrial genomes Gadidae). The 16,644 bp and 16,745 bp mtDNAs, respec- from ray-Wnned Wshes have so far (December 2007) been tively, contain the same set of 37 structural genes found in submitted to the database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), all vertebrates analyzed so far. The gene organization is and many of these sequences have contributed considerably conserved compared to other Gadidae species, but with one to resolving phylogenetic relationships among Wshes. Evo- notable exception. B. saida contains heteroplasmic rear- lutionary relationships at diVerent taxonomic levels have rangement-mediated duplications that include the origin of been addressed, including Division (Inoue et al. 2003; Miya light-strand replication and nearby tRNA genes. Examina- et al. 2003), Subdivision (Ishiguro et al. 2003), Genus tion of the mitochondrial control region of A. glacialis, (Doiron et al. 2002; Minegishi et al. 2005), and Species B. saida, and four additional representative Gadidae genera (Yanagimoto et al. 2004; Ursvik et al. 2007). identiWed a highly variable domain containing tandem The circular mitochondrial genomes from ray-Wnned repeat motifs in A. -
Balaenoptera Acutorostrata ) in Icelandic Waters 2003-2007
Paper 9 Víkingsson GA., Auðunsson GA., Elvarsson BT. and Gunnlaugsson T. (2013). Energy storage in common minke whales (Balaenoptera acutorostrata ) in Icelandic waters 2003-2007. -Chemical composition of tissues and organs. IWC. SC/F13/SP10. SC/F13/SP10 Energy storage in common minke whales (Balaenoptera acutorostrata ) in Icelandic waters 2003-2007 . – Chemical composition of tissues and organs. Gísli A. Víkingsson 1, Guðjón Atli Auðunsson 2, Bjarki Þór Elvarsson 1,3 , Þorvaldur Gunnlaugsson 1. 1Marine Research Institute, Skúlagata 4, IS-101 Reykjavík, Iceland 2Innovation Center Iceland, Dept.Ana.Chem., Árleynir 2-8, IS-112 Reykjavik, Iceland 3Science Institute, University of Iceland, Tæknigarður, Dunhagi 5, 107 Reykjavík Iceland Abstract This report details studies on chemical composition (total lipids, protein and water) of various tissues in common minke whales ( Balaenoptera acutorostrata ). Energy deposition was demonstrated by an increase in the percentage of lipids in blubber, muscle, visceral fat and bones. As in other balaenopterids, most lipids were deposited dorsally behind the dorsal fin. In addition, large amounts of energy are apparently stored as visceral fats and within bone tissue. Highest levels of lipids were found in pregnant females. Spatial variation within the Icelandic continental shelf area might be explained by corresponding variation in diet composition. A significant decrease over the research period 2003-2007 in lipid content of posterior dorsal muscle could be a result of a decrease in prey availability Introduction The common minke whale ( Balaenoptera acutorostrata ) is the most abundant baleen whale species in the Icelandic continental shelf area. Like other Balaenopterids, minke whales are migratory animals spending the summer at relatively high latitude feeding areas and the winters at lower latitude breeding areas (Horwood 1990). -
Seasonal Ecology in Ice-Covered Arctic Seas - Considerations for Spill Response Decision Making
Accepted Manuscript Seasonal ecology in ice-covered Arctic seas - Considerations for spill response decision making Magnus Aune, Ana Sofia Aniceto, Martin Biuw, Malin Daase, Stig Falk-Petersen, Eva Leu, Camilla A.M. Ottesen, Kjetil Sagerup, Lionel Camus PII: S0141-1136(17)30699-2 DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2018.09.004 Reference: MERE 4594 To appear in: Marine Environmental Research Received Date: 14 November 2017 Revised Date: 9 March 2018 Accepted Date: 3 September 2018 Please cite this article as: Aune, M., Aniceto, A.S., Biuw, M., Daase, M., Falk-Petersen, S., Leu, E., Ottesen, C.A.M., Sagerup, K., Camus, L., Seasonal ecology in ice-covered Arctic seas - Considerations for spill response decision making, Marine Environmental Research (2018), doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2018.09.004. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1 Seasonal ecology in ice-covered Arctic seas - considerations for spill 2 response decision making 3 Magnus Aune 1,6, Ana Sofia Aniceto 1,2 , Martin Biuw 3, Malin Daase 4, Stig Falk-Petersen 1,4, 4 Eva Leu 5, Camilla A.M. Ottesen 4, Kjetil Sagerup 1, Lionel Camus 1 5 6 1Akvaplan-niva -
And Narwhals (Monodon Monoceros)In the Canadian High Arctic Determined by Stomach Content and Stable Isotope Analysis Jordan K
RESEARCH/REVIEW ARTICLE Foraging ecology of ringed seals (Pusa hispida), beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas) and narwhals (Monodon monoceros)in the Canadian High Arctic determined by stomach content and stable isotope analysis Jordan K. Matley,1 Aaron T. Fisk2 & Terry A. Dick3 1 Centre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture, College of Marine and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia 2 Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada 3 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada Keywords Abstract Arctic marine mammals; stable isotopes; Stomach content and stable isotope analysis (d13C and d15N from liver and stomach contents; Bayesian mixing models; diet; Arctic cod. muscle) were used to identify habitat and seasonal prey selection by ringed seals (Pusa hispida; n21), beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas; n13) Correspondence and narwhals (Monodon monoceros; n3) in the eastern Canadian Arctic. Jordan K. Matley, College of Marine Arctic cod (Boreogadus saida) was the main prey item of all three species. Diet and Environmental Sciences, James Cook reconstruction from otoliths and stable isotope analysis revealed that while University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia. ringed seal size influenced prey selection patterns, it was variable. Prey-size E-mail: [email protected] selection and on-site observations found that ringed seals foraged on smaller, non-schooling cod whereas belugas and narwhals consumed larger individuals in schools. Further interspecific differences were demonstrated by d13C and d15N values and indicated that ringed seals consumed inshore Arctic cod compared to belugas and narwhals, which foraged to a greater extent offshore. -
Controls and Structure of the Microbial Loop
Controls and Structure of the Microbial Loop A symposium organized by the Microbial Oceanography summer course sponsored by the Agouron Foundation Saturday, July 1, 2006 Asia Room, East-West Center, University of Hawaii Symposium Speakers: Peter J. leB Williams (University of Bangor, Wales) David L. Kirchman (University of Delaware) Daniel J. Repeta (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute) Grieg Steward (University of Hawaii) The oceans constitute the largest ecosystems on the planet, comprising more than 70% of the surface area and nearly 99% of the livable space on Earth. Life in the oceans is dominated by microbes; these small, singled-celled organisms constitute the base of the marine food web and catalyze the transformation of energy and matter in the sea. The microbial loop describes the dynamics of microbial food webs, with bacteria consuming non-living organic matter and converting this energy and matter into living biomass. Consumption of bacteria by predation recycles organic matter back into the marine food web. The speakers of this symposium will explore the processes that control the structure and functioning of microbial food webs and address some of these fundamental questions: What aspects of microbial activity do we need to measure to constrain energy and material flow into and out of the microbial loop? Are we able to measure bacterioplankton dynamics (biomass, growth, production, respiration) well enough to edu/agouroninstitutecourse understand the contribution of the microbial loop to marine systems? What factors control the flow of material and energy into and out of the microbial loop? At what scales (space and time) do we need to measure processes controlling the growth and metabolism of microorganisms? How does our knowledge of microbial community structure and diversity influence our understanding of the function of the microbial loop? Program: 9:00 am Welcome and Introductory Remarks followed by: Peter J.