DOCSLIB.ORG

WY06 Annual Data Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Water Year 2008 Pg 1 of 28 [The following continuous-record water-quality sites in California have been discontinued. Daily records were collected and are stored in NWIS, unless otherwise noted, for the period of record shown for each site. Type of record: WQ (Water Quality, including Dissolved Oxygen and pH); B (Biological); C (Specific Conductance); T (Water Temperature); U (Turbidity); S (Sediment)] 09424190 Colorado River Aqueduct near San Jacinto — WQ, B 1975-81 10254670 Alamo River at Drop No. 3, near Calipatria — C,T 1981-85 10254970 New River at International Boundary, at — WQ,B,C, 1969-71, Calexico T,S 1973-85 10256060 Whitewater River at White Water Cutoff, 59.1 WQ 1972-76, at White Water 1978-96 10261100 Mojave River below Mojave River Forks 209 WQ 1967-69, Reservoir, near Hesperia 1972-74, 1976-97, 2001-05 10261480 Mojave River at Upper Narrows, at 315 WQ 2001-05 Victorville 10263500 Big Rock Creek near Valyermo 22.9 T 1962-79 10265125 Mammoth Creek at Twin Lakes, near 10.6 WQ,S 2001-05 Mammoth Lakes 10265127 Mammoth Creek Tributary below 0.27 WQ,S 2003-05 Mill City, near Mammoth Lakes 10277400 Owens River below Tinemaha Reservoir, 1,964 C,T 1975-81 near Big Pine 10293030 East Walker River at Stateline, near 400 C,S 2001-06 Bridgeport 10336593 Grass Lake Creek near Meyers 6.99 T,S 1972-74, 1997-2001 10336610 Upper Truckee River at South Lake Tahoe 54.9 C,T,S 1972-74, 1978, 1980-2003 10336612 Upper Truckee River at mouth, near 56.5 T 1997-2001 Venice Drive Pg 2 of 28 Water Year 2008 [The following continuous-record water-quality sites in California have been discontinued. Daily records were collected and are stored in NWIS, unless otherwise noted, for the period of record shown for each site. Type of record: WQ (Water Quality, including Dissolved Oxygen and pH); B (Biological); C (Specific Conductance); T (Water Temperature); U (Turbidity); S (Sediment)] 10336630 Eagle Creek near Camp Richardson 6.38 T,S 1972-74 10336640 Meeks Creek at Meeks Bay 8.08 T,S 1971-74 10336650 Quail Lake Creek at Homewood 0.95 T,S 1972-74 10336655 Madden Creek near Homewood 1.40 T,S 1972-74 10336658 Madden Creek at Homewood 2.06 T,S 1972-73 10336670 Ward Creek near Tahoe Pines 2.00 T,S 1973-76 10336672 Ward Creek Tributary near Tahoe Pines 0.89 T,S 1973-76 10336684 Dollar Creek near Tahoe City 1.07 T,S 1972-74 10336689 Snow Creek at Tahoe Vista 4.43 C,T,S 1981-85 10336740 Logan House Creek near Glenbrook, NV 2.09 S 1984-87 10336759 Edgewood Creek near Stateline, NV 3.20 S 1983-87 10336775 Trout Creek at Pioneer Trail, near 23.7 C,T 1990-2003 South Lake Tahoe 10336780 Trout Creek near Tahoe Valley 36.7 C,T,S 1971-74, 1978, 1980-85, 1987-88 1997-2003 10336795 Trout Creek near mouth east, near 41.0 T 1997-2001 Bellevue/Eldorado Avenue 10337000 Lake Tahoe at Tahoe City 506 WQ 1969, 1978-79 10338000 Truckee River near Truckee 553 WQ,C,T 1951-66, 1977-82, 1993-94 10338700 Donner Creek at Highway 89, near 29.1 T 1993-94 Truckee Water Year 2008 Pg 3 of 28 [The following continuous-record water-quality sites in California have been discontinued. Daily records were collected and are stored in NWIS, unless otherwise noted, for the period of record shown for each site. Type of record: WQ (Water Quality, including Dissolved Oxygen and pH); B (Biological); C (Specific Conductance); T (Water Temperature); U (Turbidity); S (Sediment)] 10339250 Martis Creek at Highway 267, near 25.8 WQ,T,S 1975-95 Truckee 10339380 Martis Creek Lake near Truckee 40.0 WQ,S 1975-95 10339419 Truckee River above Prosser Creek, near 644 C,T 1994-98 Truckee 10340500 Prosser Creek below Prosser Creek Dam, 52.9 T 1993-98 near Truckee 10341950 Little Truckee River below Diversion 36.1 T 1993-94 Dam, near Sierraville 10343200 Little Truckee River at Highway 89, near 59.0 T 1993-94 Truckee 10344500 Little Truckee River below Boca Dam, 173 T 1993-98 near Truckee 10345490 Gray Creek near Floriston 17.6 WQ,C,T, 2002-07 U,S 10345700 Bronco Creek at Floriston 15.4 T 1993-94 10345900 Truckee River at Floriston 932 T 1968-71 10356500 Susan River at Susanville 184 WQ,B,S 1952-93 11013500 Tijuana River near Nestor 1,695 T,S 1970-71, 1976, 1978 11022500 San Diego River near Santee 377 T,S 1970-78 11023000 San Diego River at Fashion Valley, at 429 T,S 1984 San Diego 11030500 San Dieguito River near Del Mar 338 S 1984 11042000 San Luis Rey River at Oceanside 557 WQ,B,C, 1969-93 T,S Pg 4 of 28 Water Year 2008 [The following continuous-record water-quality sites in California have been discontinued. Daily records were collected and are stored in NWIS, unless otherwise noted, for the period of record shown for each site. Type of record: WQ (Water Quality, including Dissolved Oxygen and pH); B (Biological); C (Specific Conductance); T (Water Temperature); U (Turbidity); S (Sediment)] 11044300 Santa Margarita River at Fallbrook Public 620 WQ,C,T 2000-03 Utility Sump, near Fallbrook 11046000 Santa Margarita River at Ysidora 723 WQ,T,S 1969-83 11046500 San Juan Creek near San Juan Capistrano 106 T,S 1967-68, 1971, 1982 11046530 San Juan Creek at La Novia Street Bridge, 109 T,S 1986-93 at San Juan Capistrano 11046550 San Juan Creek at San Juan Capistrano 117 T,S 1972-82, 1987 11047000 Arroyo Trabuco near San Juan Capistrano 35.7 T,S 1967, 1978 11047300 Arroyo Trabuco at San Juan Capistrano 54.1 T,S 1971-77, 1984-93 11048500 San Diego Creek at Culver Drive, near 41.8 T,S 1972-85 Irvine 11048530 El Modena-Irvine Channel at — T,S 1975-79 Myford Road, near Tustin 11048540 Peters Canyon Wash at Barranca Road, — T,S 1975-79, near Irvine 1983-85 11048550 San Diego Creek at Lane Road, near Irvine — T,S 1972-76 11048555 San Diego Creek at Campus Drive, near — T,S 1972-76, Irvine 1978-79, 1983-85 11049400 Santa Ana River above Seven Oaks Dam 200 WQ,S 2000, 2002-06 11051500 Santa Ana River near Mentone 210 WQ,C,T, 1999-2001 S 11056200 Santa Ana River at Waterman Avenue, at 359 T,S 1977, 1979 San Bernardino Water Year 2008 Pg 5 of 28 [The following continuous-record water-quality sites in California have been discontinued. Daily records were collected and are stored in NWIS, unless otherwise noted, for the period of record shown for each site. Type of record: WQ (Water Quality, including Dissolved Oxygen and pH); B (Biological); C (Specific Conductance); T (Water Temperature); U (Turbidity); S (Sediment)] 11057000 San Timoteo Creek near Redlands 118 T,S 1977-78 11059100 San Bernardino Water-Quality Control — C 1973-80 Plant at San Bernardino 11066480 Riverside Water-Quality Control Plant at — C 1970-82 Riverside Narrows, near Arlington 11066500 Santa Ana River at Riverside Narrows, 853 C,T 1968 near Arlington 11067890 Santa Ana River at Prado Park, near 1,010 T,S 1976-80 Corona 11068000 Santa Ana River at Auburndale Bridge, 1,010 C,T 1968 near Corona 11073495 Cucamonga Creek near Mira Loma 75.8 WQ,C,T, 1999-2000 S 11075600 Santa Ana River at Imperial Highway, near 1,544 T,S 1973-77, Anaheim 1979 11075610 Santa Ana River above Spreading 1,545 C,T,S 1999-2001 Diversion, below Imperial Highway, near Anaheim 11075620 Santa Ana River Spreading Diversion, — WQ,C,T 1974-85, below Imperial Highway, near Anaheim 1996-2001 11075755 Santa Ana River at Ball Road, at Anaheim 1,587 T,S 1977-80 11075760 Santa Ana River near Katella Avenue, at 1,593 T,S 1974-76 Orange 11078000 Santa Ana River at Santa Ana 1,700 WQ,T,S 1968-71, 1973-80, 1982-2003 11078100 Santa Ana River at Adams Avenue, near 1,701 T,S 1974-76 Costa Mesa Pg 6 of 28 Water Year 2008 [The following continuous-record water-quality sites in California have been discontinued. Daily records were collected and are stored in NWIS, unless otherwise noted, for the period of record shown for each site. Type of record: WQ (Water Quality, including Dissolved Oxygen and pH); B (Biological); C (Specific Conductance); T (Water Temperature); U (Turbidity); S (Sediment)] 11102250 Mission Creek below — C 1956-70 Whittier Narrows Dam 11103000 Los Angeles River at Long Beach 827 C,T 1979-84 11103010 Los Angeles River at Willow Street 831 C,T 1974-75, Bridge, at Long Beach 1981 11105850 Arroyo Simi near Simi 70.6 T,S 1970-71, 1974-78 11108500 Santa Clara River at Los Angeles-Ventura 625 WQ,B,T, 1969-88 County Line S 11109550 Piru Creek above Frenchmans Flat 308 C 1972-80 11109600 Piru Creek above Lake Piru 372 C 1972-80 11109800 Piru Creek below Santa Felicia Dam 425 WQ,C,T 1969, 1974-80 11110000 Piru Creek near Piru 437 C,T 1970-71 11110500 Hopper Creek near Piru 23.6 T,S 1977-78 11111500 Sespe Creek near Wheeler Springs 49.5 T,S 1956, 1962-78 11113000 Sespe Creek near Fillmore 251 WQ,C,T, 1967-81 S 11113500 Santa Paula Creek near Santa Paula 38.4 WQ,T 1969-80 11113900 Saticoy Diversion near Saticoy — C,T 1969-71, 1982-87 11113910 Santa Clara River at diversion, — C 1971 near Saticoy 11114000 Santa Clara River at Montalvo 1,594 T,S 1969-85, 1989-93 Water Year 2008 Pg 7 of 28 [The following continuous-record water-quality sites in California have been discontinued.
Recommended publications
  • Center Comments to the California Department of Fish and Game

    Center Comments to the California Department of Fish and Game

    July 24, 2006 Ryan Broderick, Director California Department of Fish and Game 1416 Ninth Street, 12th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 RE: Improving efficiency of California’s fish hatchery system Dear Director Broderick: On behalf of the Pacific Rivers Council and Center for Biological Diversity, we are writing to express our concerns about the state’s fish hatchery and stocking system and to recommend needed changes that will ensure that the system does not negatively impact California’s native biological diversity. This letter is an update to our letter of August 31, 2005. With this letter, we are enclosing many of the scientific studies we relied on in developing this letter. Fish hatcheries and the stocking of fish into lakes and streams cause numerous measurable, significant environmental effects on California ecosystems. Based on these impacts, numerous policy changes are needed to ensure that the Department of Fish and Game’s (“DFG”) operation of the state’s hatchery and stocking program do not adversely affect California’s environment. Further, as currently operated, the state’s hatchery and stocking program do not comply with the California Environmental Quality Act, Administrative Procedures Act, California Endangered Species Act, and federal Endangered Species Act. The impacts to California’s environment, and needed policy changes to bring the state’s hatchery and stocking program into compliance with applicable state and federal laws, are described below. I. FISH STOCKING NEGATIVELY IMPACTS CALIFORNIA’S NATIVE SALMONIDS, INCLUDING THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES Introduced salmonids negatively impact native salmonids in a variety of ways. Moyle, et. al. (1996) notes that “Introduction of non-native fish species has also been the single biggest factor associated with fish declines in the Sierra Nevada.” Moyle also notes that introduced species are contributing to the decline of 18 species of native Sierra Nevada fish species, and are a major factor in the decline of eight of those species.
  • Grants of Land in California Made by Spanish Or Mexican Authorities

    Grants of Land in California Made by Spanish Or Mexican Authorities

    -::, » . .• f Grants of Land in California Made by Spanish or Mexican Authorities Prepared by the Staff of the State Lands Commission ----- -- -·- PREFACE This report was prepared by Cris Perez under direction of Lou Shafer. There were three main reasons for its preparation. First, it provides a convenient reference to patent data used by staff Boundary Officers and others who may find the information helpful. Secondly, this report provides a background for newer members who may be unfamiliar with Spanish and Mexican land grants and the general circumstances surrounding the transfer of land from Mexican to American dominion. Lastly, it provides sources for additional reading for those who may wish to study further. The report has not been reviewed by the Executive Staff of the Commission and has not been approved by the State Lands Commission. If there are any questions regarding this report, direct them to Cris Perez or myself at the Office of the State Lands Commission, 1807 - 13th Street, Sacramento, California 95814. ROY MINNICK, Supervisor Boundary Investigation Unit 0401L VI TABLE OF CONTENlS Preface UI List of Maps x Introduction 1 Private Land Claims in California 2 Missions, Presidios, and Pueblos 7 Explanation of Terms Used in This Report 14 GRANTS OF LAND BY COUNTY AlamE:1da County 15 Amador County 19 Butte County 21 Calaveras County 23 Colusa County 25 Contra Costa County 27 Fresno County 31 Glenn County 33 Kern County 35 Kings County 39 Lake County 41 Los Angeles County 43 Marin County 53 Mariposa County 57 Mendocino County
  • DONNER LAKE - AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES MANDATORY SELF-INSPECTION LAUNCH CERTIFICATE PERMIT Town of Truckee Ordinance 2020-03 Chapter 14.01

    DONNER LAKE - AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES MANDATORY SELF-INSPECTION LAUNCH CERTIFICATE PERMIT Town of Truckee Ordinance 2020-03 Chapter 14.01

    DONNER LAKE - AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES MANDATORY SELF-INSPECTION LAUNCH CERTIFICATE PERMIT Town of Truckee Ordinance 2020-03 Chapter 14.01 Must Complete, sign, and date this Launch Certification Permit and keep in the vessel. If this is the first inspection of the year, the owner or operator of the vessel shall submit a self-inspection form to the Town of Truckee and obtain an inspection sticker for the vessel. *All motorized watercraft STILL require an inspection before launching into Donner Lake. Non-motorized watercraft are also capable of transporting aquatic invasive species. It is highly recommended to complete a self-inspection on all watercraft. Vessel Registration Number: Zip Code: Date: Boat Type (circle one): Ski/Wake Sail PWC/Jet Ski Fishing Pleasure Boat Wooden Non-Moto Other: Last Waterbody visited with this watercraft: 1. Is your vessel, trailer and all equipment clean of all mud, dirt, plants, fish or animals and drained of all water including all bilge areas, fresh-water cooling systems, lower outboard units, ballast tanks, live-wells, buckets, etc. and completely dry? YES, my vessel is Clean, Drain and Dry No, my vessel is NOT Clean, Drain and Dry. Vessel must be cleaned, drained and completely dry before it will be permitted to launch. Do not clean or drain your vessel by the lake or at the launch ramp. See below for details on how to properly clean your vessel and equipment prior to launching. 2. Has your vessel been in any of the infested waters listed on the back page of this form within the last 30 days? YES, my vessel has been in an infested body of water: Go to question 3 No, my vessel has NOT been in an infested body of water: You are ready to launch.
  • Renew the Government T a ATES OF

    Renew the Government T a ATES OF

    NT O ME F T EN R E A R P G E Y D • • U N A I C T I E R D E S M Renew the Government T A ATES OF U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Summary of Projects and Lessons Learned U.S. Department of Energy • Sandia National Laboratories • Bureau of Land Management National Park Service • USDA Forest Service Partners in Expanding the use of Renewable Energy SAND98-1943 Click here to see a listing of government Projects by State (Excel database) RENEW THE GOVERNMENT SUMMARY OF PROJECTS AND LESSONS LEARNED ACKNOWLEDGMENTS A special thanks goes to Jim Rannels, DOE Office of Photovoltaic and Wind Technology, and Anne Sprunt Crawley, DOE Federal Energy Management Program, without whose support the Renew the Government effort would not have been possible. We also wish to express our appreciation to Doug DeNio, National Park Service (retired), and Fred Bloom, formerly Tonto National Forest, for their commitment and enthusiasm in setting the groundwork that allowed this effort to go forward. Gabriella Cisneros and Vern Risser of the Southwest Technology Development Institute helped develop the project information database. Anne Van Arsdall and Connie Brooks, Sandia National Laboratories, provided significant editorial assistance and Subia was responsible for the publication design. Our biggest thanks, however, goes to the many Park, BLM, and Forest participants who chose to get involved in using photovoltaics and to the U.S. photovoltaics industry who provided the quality systems that made this endeavor successful. Hal Post and Mike Thomas Trent Duncan Photovoltaic Systems Assistance Center Utah State Office Sandia National Laboratories Bureau of Land Management Pat Fleming Andrew Dziobek Denver Service Center Tonto National Forest National Park Service USDA Forest Service ABSTRACT For the past several years, the Photovoltaic Systems Assistance Center at Sandia National Laboratories has maintained collaborative partnerships with the National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, and USDA Forest Service.
  • LWCF Projects 1964 to 2019

    LWCF Projects 1964 to 2019

    FiscalYear CountyName AgencyName ProjectNumber ProjectName ProjectScope GrantAmount ProjectAddress ProjectCity ProjectZipCod Latitude Longitude e 2018/19 Kern City of Bakersfield 06-01827 Kaiser Permanente Construct 4 new football fields, a restroom and concession $3,000,000 9001 Ashe Road Bakersfield 93313 NULL NULL Sports Village stand, exercise outdoor gym area, 3 parking lots, Project installation of sports field lighting, and landscaping at the Kaiser Permanente Sports Village in the City of Bakersfield. 2018/19 Humboldt City of Eureka 06-01826 Sequoia Park Construct new trails, playground facilities, off-street ADA $1,525,000 3414 W Street Eureka 95503 NULL NULL Redwood Canopy compliant parking and new restrooms and renovate trails Walk and Trail in Sequoia Park in the City of Eureka. Project 2018/19 Riverside City of Indio 06-0130 South Jackson Park Construct a new approximately 0.5 mile trail with exercise $652,500 83100 Date Indio 92201 NULL NULL Accessibility stations and plant approximately 50 new trees, renovate Avenue Improvements existing playgrounds and provide ADA improvements at South Jackson Park in the City of Indio. 2018/19 Los Angeles City of Long Beach 06-01828 Davenport Park Construct a new multi-use sports field, shaded outdoor $2,016,000 2910 East 55th Long Beach 90805 NULL NULL Phase II seating area, and install exercise equipment with signage Way in Davenport Park in the City of Long Beach. 2018/19 Madera County of Madera 06-01829 Courthouse Park Construct a new playground, exercise stations, and picnic $203,747 210 W. Yosemite Madera 93637 NULL NULL Project area at Courthouse Park in the City of Madera.
  • 12.4 Groups Groups 12.4

    12.4 Groups Groups 12.4

    12.4 Groups Groups 12.4 GROUPS GROUPS THAT SUBMITTED COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT PEIR Comment Letter Comment Letter Name of Organization/ Format ID Commenter Title Affiliation Page Email SI_ACA1 Jeff Miller Director Alameda Creek Alliance 12.4-1 PH Fremont SI_ACA2 Jeff Miller Director Alameda Creek Alliance 12.6-52 David T. Smernoff, Board Acterra: Action for a Email SI_ACT 12.4-12 Ph.D. Vice President Sustainable Earth Citizens Advisory Email SI_CAC1 Steve Lawrence Vice Chair 12.4-13 Committee to the SFPUC Citizens Advisory Email SI_CAC2 Steve Lawrence Vice Chair 12.4-13 Committee to the SFPUC Chief Executive Mail SI_Caltrout Brian Stranko California Trout 12.4-14 Officer Republicans for Environmental Buddy Burke / CA REP President & Protection, Protection Email SI_CAREP Virginia Chang CA REP Vice 12.4-14 Commissioner, California Kiraly President Commission for Economic Development PH Palo Alto SI_CI Katherine Forrest Member Commonwealth Institute 12.6-77 California Native Plant Mail SI_CNPS Amanda Jorgenson Executive Director 12.4-15 Society California Native Plant Conservation Email SI_CNPS-EB1 Laura Baker Society, East Bay 12.4-15 Committee Chair Chapter California Native Plant PH Fremont SI_CNPS-EB2 Lech Naumovich Society, East Bay 12.6-56 Chapter California Native Plant President, Santa Email SI_CNPS-SCV1 Kevin Bryant Society, Santa Clara 12.4-33 Clara Valley Chapter Valley Chapter California Native Plant Mail SI_CNPS-SCV2 Libby Lucas Conservation Society, Santa Clara 12.4-36 Valley Chapter SF Planning Department Case No. 2005.0159E 12.4-i
  • Assessing Willow Flycatcher Population Size and Distribution to Inform Meadow Restoration Priorities in the Sierra Nevada and Southern Cascades

    Assessing Willow Flycatcher Population Size and Distribution to Inform Meadow Restoration Priorities in the Sierra Nevada and Southern Cascades

    Produced by The Institute for Bird Populations’ Sierra Nevada Bird Observatory ASSESSING WILLOW FLYCATCHER POPULATION SIZE AND DISTRIBUTION TO INFORM MEADOW RESTORATION PRIORITIES IN THE SIERRA NEVADA AND SOUTHERN CASCADES September 25, 2014 Helen Loffland and Rodney Siegel Chris Stermer The Institute for Bird Populations Staff Environmental Scientist P.O. Box 1346 California Department of Fish and Wildlife Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 1812 Ninth Street www.birdpop.org Sacramento, CA 95811 Ryan Burnett and Brent Campos Tina Mark Point Blue Conservation Science Wildlife, Aquatics, Rare Plant Program Manager P.O. Box 634 Tahoe National Forest Chester, CA 96020 631 Coyote Street www.pointblue.org Nevada City, CA 95959 Above: Willow Flycatcher (inset) and breeding habitat at Red Lake Peak, Alpine County. The Institute for Bird Populations Willow Flycatcher Population Status in the Sierra Nevada Recommended citation: Loffland, H. L., R. B. Siegel, R. D. Burnett, B. R. Campos, T. Mark, C. Stermer 2014. Assessing Willow Flycatcher population size and distribution to inform meadow restoration in the Sierra Nevada and Southern Cascades. The Institute for Bird Populations, Point Reyes Station, California. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank countless agencies and individuals for conducting recent and historic Willow Flycatcher surveys and sharing data for this synthesis. This project was made possible by a grant from the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, and was conducted by The Institute for Bird Populations’ Sierra Nevada Bird Observatory. This is Contribution No. 483 of The Institute for Bird Populations. i The Institute for Bird Populations Willow Flycatcher Population Status in the Sierra Nevada Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................
  • Wildlife Habitat and Water Quality Enhancement Opportunities at Castlewood Country Club September 2020

    Wildlife Habitat and Water Quality Enhancement Opportunities at Castlewood Country Club September 2020

    Wildlife Habitat and Water Quality Enhancement Opportunities at Castlewood Country Club september 2020 PREPARED BY IN PARTNERSHIP WITH San Francisco Estuary Institute Alameda County Flood Control and H.T. Harvey & Associates Water Conservation District, Zone 7 FUNDED BY San Francisco Bay Water Quality Improvement Fund, EPA Region IX A PRODUCT OF PREPARING FOR THE STORM FINAL zone 7 Wildlife Habitat and Water Quality Enhancement Opportunities at Castlewood Country Club PREPARED BY San Francisco Estuary Institute H.T. Harvey & Associates PREPARED FOR Castlewood Country Club IN PARTNERSHIP WITH Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Zone 7 FUNDED BY A grant from the San Francisco Bay Water Quality Improvement Fund, EPA Region IX AUTHORS Stephanie Panlasigui, SFEI Sarah Pearce, SFEI Ryan Hegstad, H.T. Harvey & Associates Matthew Quinn, H.T. Harvey & Associates Alison Whipple, SFEI DESIGN Ruth Askevold, SFEI Ellen Plane, SFEI A PRODUCT OF PREPARING FOR THE STORM FINAL SEPTEMBER 2020 SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY INSTITUTE PUBLICATION #1003 SUGGESTED CITATION Panlasigui, S, Pearce, S, Hegstad, R, Quinn, M, Whipple, A 2020. Wildlife Habitat and Water Quality Enhancement Opportunities at Castlewood Country Club. In collaboration with Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Zone 7. Prepared for the US Environmental Protection Agency’s Water Quality Improvement Fund. SFEI Publication #1003, San Francisco Estuary Institute, Richmond, CA. REPORT AVAILABILITY Report is available on SFEI’s website at http://www.sfei.org/projects/preparing-storm. IMAGE PERMISSION Permissions rights for images used in this publication have been specifically acquired for one-time use in this publication only. Further use or reproduction is prohibited without express written permission from the individual or institution credited.
  • (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California

    (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California

    Historical Distribution and Current Status of Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California Robert A. Leidy, Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco, CA Gordon S. Becker, Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA Brett N. Harvey, John Muir Institute of the Environment, University of California, Davis, CA This report should be cited as: Leidy, R.A., G.S. Becker, B.N. Harvey. 2005. Historical distribution and current status of steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration TABLE OF CONTENTS Forward p. 3 Introduction p. 5 Methods p. 7 Determining Historical Distribution and Current Status; Information Presented in the Report; Table Headings and Terms Defined; Mapping Methods Contra Costa County p. 13 Marsh Creek Watershed; Mt. Diablo Creek Watershed; Walnut Creek Watershed; Rodeo Creek Watershed; Refugio Creek Watershed; Pinole Creek Watershed; Garrity Creek Watershed; San Pablo Creek Watershed; Wildcat Creek Watershed; Cerrito Creek Watershed Contra Costa County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p. 39 Alameda County p. 45 Codornices Creek Watershed; Strawberry Creek Watershed; Temescal Creek Watershed; Glen Echo Creek Watershed; Sausal Creek Watershed; Peralta Creek Watershed; Lion Creek Watershed; Arroyo Viejo Watershed; San Leandro Creek Watershed; San Lorenzo Creek Watershed; Alameda Creek Watershed; Laguna Creek (Arroyo de la Laguna) Watershed Alameda County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p. 91 Santa Clara County p. 97 Coyote Creek Watershed; Guadalupe River Watershed; San Tomas Aquino Creek/Saratoga Creek Watershed; Calabazas Creek Watershed; Stevens Creek Watershed; Permanente Creek Watershed; Adobe Creek Watershed; Matadero Creek/Barron Creek Watershed Santa Clara County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p.
  • Appendix D Species Accounts Appendix D Species Accounts

    Appendix D Species Accounts Appendix D Species Accounts

    Appendix D Species Accounts Appendix D Species Accounts Table of Contents San Joaquin Spearscale (Atriplex joaquiniana) ...................................................... 1 Recurved Larkspur (Delphinium recurvatum) ........................................................ 4 Big Tarplant (Blepharizonia plumosa) .................................................................... 6 Congdon’s Tarplant (Centromadia parryi ssp. congdonii) ..................................... 8 Palmate-bracted bird’s-beak (Cordylanthus palmatus) ....................................... 10 Livermore tarplant (Deinandra bacigalupii) ........................................................ 11 Longhorn Fairy Shrimp ......................................................................................... 12 Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp ..................................................................................... 15 Callippe Silverspot Butterfly ................................................................................ 18 California Tiger Salamander ................................................................................. 21 California Red-Legged Frog .................................................................................. 25 Foothill yellow-legged frog .................................................................................. 28 Alameda Whipsnake ............................................................................................ 31 Central California Coast Steelhead .....................................................................
  • Alameda Creek Fisheries Restoration Workgroup Minutes of Meeting March 5, 2003 Alameda County Public Works Agency

    Alameda Creek Fisheries Restoration Workgroup Minutes of Meeting March 5, 2003 Alameda County Public Works Agency

    Alameda Creek Fisheries Restoration Workgroup Minutes of Meeting March 5, 2003 Alameda County Public Works Agency Attendees Pete Alexander EBRPD Kristine Atkinson DFG Gordon Becker CEMAR Dale Boyer RWQCB Brenda Buxton State Coastal Conservancy Eric Cartwright ACWD Laurel Collins ACFCWCD consultant Chuck Hanson Hanson Environmental Craig Hill ACWD Jim Horen Zone 7 Water Agency Terry Huff NRCS Ralph Johnson ACFCWCD Laura Kilgour ACFCWCD Jeff Miller ACA Josh Milstein SFPUC Stuart Moock PG&E Joe Naras SFPUC Jim Reynolds ACWD Jim Robins Jones and Stokes Anna Roche SFPUC Brian Sak SFPUC Jackie Shick NRCS Janet Sowers William Lettis & Associates Gary Stern NOAA Fisheries Jennifer Stokes SFPUC Announcements The first Steelhead Festival planning meeting was announced for March 6th. The festival is scheduled to occur on May 10th. Updates §1135 Process. Laura Kilgour said that the Corps' Detailed Project Report (DPR) is scheduled to be completed in August 2006, suggesting that project construction is not expected until at least 2008. Dale Boyer noted that lobbying of congresspersons by Workgroup members and agency managers may be beneficial if they urge the Corps' to accelerate its activities. Brenda Buxton re- stated her agency's commitment to help fund steelhead passage projects in Alameda Creek, indicating that the Workgroup should continue to evaluate alternatives to funding via the 1135 Process. With sufficient matching funds, as much as $5 million may be available through the Conservancy. FRW Meeting Minutes: 3.5.2003 1 SFPUC Activities. Josh Milstein told the Workgroup that the SFPUC started the Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) process for various species of concern occurring on the Alameda Creek watershed properties held by the agency.
  • LTBMU Final Pre-Scoping Comments

    LTBMU Final Pre-Scoping Comments

    May 2, 2016 Jeff Marsolais Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit 35 College Drive South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 Submitted via email to [email protected] Re: Pre-Scoping Comments on Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit Over-Snow Vehicle Use Designation Dear Jeff and the OSV planning team, Thank you for the opportunity to provide pre-scoping comments on the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit’s Over-Snow Vehicle planning process. Thank you in advance for your consideration and for the hard work we know this process entails. Winter Wildlands Alliance (WWA) is an Idaho-based nonprofit organization representing the interests of human-powered winter recreationists across the U.S. and an official partner of the US Forest Service. Our mission is to promote and preserve winter wildlands and a quality human-powered snowsports experience on public lands, as well as to improve public education and outreach concerning wild winter landscapes. WWA represents over 50,000 members and 40 grassroots partner organizations in 11 states, including California-based Snowlands Network and the Tahoe Backcountry Alliance. Many of WWA’s members use the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit (LTBMU) for Nordic and backcountry skiing, snowshoeing, climbing, mountaineering, and winter hiking. Many of our members also use OSVs. Starting in 2012 we have worked with Snowlands Network to advocate for winter travel planning on the LTBMU and we are glad to see the LTBMU undertaking this process. Given that there have been several years of conversations and attempted collaborative efforts focused on winter travel planning on this forest, we expect that the proposed action will reflect many of the issues and suggestions that have been raised in relation to this issue in the past.