DOCSLIB.ORG

Peer Review – Report North Macedonia 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Peer Review – Report North Macedonia 2018 Peer review – report North Macedonia 2018 Funded by European Union Civil Protection / 2 PEER REVIEW – REPORT NORTH MACEDONIA 2018 PEER REVIEW – REPORT NORTH MACEDONIA 2018 PEER REVIEW – REPORT NORTH MACEDONIA 2018 / 3 Peer review The Republic of North Macedonia 2018 2018-2019 Programme for peer reviews in the framework of EU cooperation on civil protection and disaster risk management. Funded by European Union Civil Protection Disclaimer The information and views set out in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Commission or the authors’ organisations. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on its behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained herein. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. / 4 PEER REVIEW – REPORT NORTH MACEDONIA 2018 Contents List of abbreviations ............................................................................p7 1. Introduction ........................................................................................p9 1.1 Scope of the review ..................................................................................... p10 1.2 Review process ............................................................................................ p11 1.3 Country profile ............................................................................................. p12 1.3.1 Overview ......................................................................................... p12 1.3.2 Disaster risk profile ........................................................................ p13 1.3.3 Vulnerability .................................................................................... p15 1.3.4 Lack of coping capacity ................................................................. p16 1.3.5 National disaster management system ...................................... p16 1.3.6 Disaster management entities ..................................................... p18 1.3.7 DRR: relevant sectors .................................................................... p22 2. Comprehensive Disaster Risk Management (DRM) approach ................................................................................................ p25 2.1 Policy and Legal Framework (at national, regional and local level) ....... p26 2.1.1 The role of the National Coordinator for Disaster Risk Reduction .. p29 2.1.2 Measurability and evaluation of plans ........................................ p30 2.1.3 Integration of lessons learned ..................................................... p30 2.2 International, regional and local collaboration ........................................ p31 2.2.1 International collaboration ........................................................... p31 2.2.2 European collaboration ................................................................ p32 2.2.3 Regional and local collaboration .................................................. p32 2.3 Integration of DRR with climate change adaptation .......................................p32 2.4 Good practices and recommendations ...................................................... p34 3. Prevention ........................................................................................ p35 3.1 Risk assessment ........................................................................................... p35 3.1.1 Risk assessment process .............................................................. p35 3.1.1.1 Collection and use of data ..................................................... p36 3.1.1.2 Risk identification .................................................................... p37 PEER REVIEW – REPORT NORTH MACEDONIA 2018 PEER REVIEW – REPORT NORTH MACEDONIA 2018 / 5 3.1.2 Stakeholder consultation .............................................................. p38 3.1.3 Public awareness strategy ............................................................ p38 3.1.4 Administrative, financial and technical aspects ......................... p39 3.2 Risk management planning ........................................................................ p40 3.2.1 Risk management planning process ........................................... p40 3.2.2 Administrative, financial and technical aspects ......................... p40 3.3 Good practices and recommendations .................................................... p41 4. Preparedness .................................................................................p42 4.1 Disaster preparedness and contingency plans ....................................... p42 4.2 Collaboration with stakeholders ................................................................ p43 4.3 Capability analysis and planning ............................................................... p44 4.4 Training and exercises ................................................................................ p44 4.5 International and regional collaboration .................................................. p45 4.6 Risk communication .................................................................................... p47 4.7 Good practices and recommendations .................................................... p48 5. Key findings and recommendations ...................................p49 5.1 Good practices ............................................................................................. p49 5.2 Challenges and recommendations ........................................................... p50 5.3 Proposals for development ........................................................................ p52 5.4 Principal recommendation on national arrangements for civil protection .................................................................................................... p54 5.5 Justification ................................................................................................... p56 5.6 Other recommendations to improve the existing system ..................... p56 5.7 Short term (<12 months) ............................................................................ p57 5.8 Medium term (6-24 months) ...................................................................... p58 5.9 Longer term (12-36 months) ...................................................................... p59 Annex I – Terminology ....................................................................p60 Annex II – List of documentation ................................................ p61 Annex III – Themes for potential further development ... p62 / 6 PEER REVIEW – REPORT NORTH MACEDONIA 2018 Acknowledgements The time and expertise dedicated by the peers was essential for the completion of this report. The peer review team was composed of four peers: f Dirk Kamm, Former Head of Disaster Management, German Red Cross and Former Acting Head of International Affairs, Federal Office of Civil Protection and Disaster Assistance, Germany; f Owen Jackson, Assistant Director for International Resilience and Head of Science and Engineering, UK Cabinet Office (Civil Contingencies Secretariat), United Kingdom; f Salem Yousfi, Head of the Regional Directorate of Civil Protection of Zaghouan (Colonel), Tunisian National Office of Civil Protection, Tunisia; f Samir Agić, Assistant Minister of Security and Head of Sector for Protection and Rescue, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Biljana Zuber supported and took part in the mission on behalf of the European Commission’s Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (ECHO). A consortium led by Ecorys Nederland B.V. assisted the Commission in carrying out the peer review. Gerald Walther from Fraunhofer INT was project manager for the Republic of North Macedonia and provided technical and administrative support to the peers throughout the review process. The team was further supported by Hugo van Manen, who travelled to the Republic of North Macedonia to participate in the mission on behalf of Ecorys Nederland B.V. The peer review would not have been possible without the significant contributions of all consulted stakeholders in the Republic of North Macedonia, some of which went so far as to make themselves available to be interviewed on the Day of the Macedonian Revolution on 23 October 2018 and provided the review team with invaluable inputs throughout their stay in the country. The Protection and Rescue Directorate (PRD) volunteered to undergo the peer review on behalf of the Republic of North Macedonia and provided on-site support throughout the mission. Particular thanks are due for the full commitment of the Directorate’s staff, and for the full-time logistical support provided by Valentina Atanasovska on the Directorate’s behalf. The peer review was financed by the European Union. PEER REVIEW – REPORT NORTH MACEDONIA 2018 PEER REVIEW – REPORT NORTH MACEDONIA 2018 / 7 List of abbreviations Abbreviation Definition CBRN Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear CISE Common Information Sharing Environment CMC Crisis Management Center CMEP Civil-Military Emergency Planning DEMA Danish Emergency Management Agency Directorate General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian DG ECHO Aid Operations DPPI SEE Disaster Preparedness and Prevention Initiative for South Eastern Europe DRM Disaster Risk Management DRR Disaster Risk Reduction EFFIS European Forest Fire Information System EU European Union EUR Euro (€) GIZ German Corporation for International Cooperation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission of the Republic of North Macedonia in 2018
    ENERGY AND WATER SERVICES REGULATORY COMMISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA APRIL 2019 ANNUAL REPORT 201 8 Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission of the Republic of North Macedonia in 2018 ENERGY AND WATER SERVICES REGULATORY COMMISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA ___________________________________________________________________ The Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission of the Republic of North Macedonia for 2018 has been prepared in accordance with Article 36 from the Energy Law, which establishes the obligation of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission to submit the Annual Report for its operation during the previous year to the Assembly of the Republic of North Macedonia, not later than 30th of April of the current year. The Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission for 2018 contains detailed information on the performance of the competences according to the Energy Law and the Law on Setting Prices of Water Services, as well as information on the material-financial operation. The Energy Law also determines that the Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission needs to be submitted to the Government of the Republic of North Macedonia and the Ministry competent for the performance of the assignments within the energy area, so that they could be informed, as well as to the Energy Community Secretariat. The Report contains overview of the activities performed by the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission during 2018, with special review of: − State of the energy markets, − State of the prices and tariffs regulation, − Preparing regulatory acts, − International activities and − Financial Statement of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Parties and Elections Macedonia November 2004 ZA4326
    ZA-Archiv Nummer 4326 Parties and Elections Macedonia November 2004 ZA4326 POLL - November 2004 1. If parliamentary elections were held next week, which party would you vote for? (DO NOT READ OUT OPTIONS) 1.Social-Democratic Union of Macedonia 2. VMRO-DPMNE 3. Liberal Democratic Party 4. Liberal Party 5. Democratic Union for Integration 6. The third way 7. VMRO-Peoples party 8. Democratic Party of Albanians 9. Party for Democratic Prosperity 10. other 11. no one 12. do not know 13. no answer 2. Which politician do you trust the most? (DO NOT READ OUT OPTIONS) 1. no one 2. do not know 3. no answer 4. Hari Kostov 5. Vlado Buchkovski 6. Nikola Gruevski 7. Arben Xaferi 8. Ali Ahmeti 9. Radmila Shekerinska 10. Tito Petkovski 11. Nikola Popovski 12. Stevcho Jakimovski 13. Branko Crvenkovski 14. Trifun Kostovski 15. Vasil Tupurkovski 16. Abdulafman Bexeti 17. Rufi Osmani 18. Sashko Kedev 19. Stojan Andov 20. Risto Penov 21. Qubisav Ivanov-Yingo 22. Ganka Samoilova Cvetanovska 23. Ilinka Mitreva 24. Dosta Dimovska 25. Marijan Gjorchev 26. Ljubcho Georgievski 27. Ljupcho Jordanovski 28. Pavle Trajanov 29. other (write who) _______________ 1 ZA4326 3. According to you, who will be the new president of the Social-Democratic Union? 1. Radmila Shekerinska 2. Vlado Buchkovski 3. Nikola Popovski 4. Tito Petkovski 5. Ilinka Mitreva 6. do not know (DO NOT READ OUT) 7. no answer (DO NOT READ OUT) 4. Do you consider that the present Government is corrupted? 1. yes 2. no 3. do not know 4. no answer (DO NOT READ OUT) 2 ZA4326 DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE RESPONDENT (5) Gender 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Viewership Survey Report New Heroes: a Reality TV Show in North
    Viewership Survey Report New Heroes: A Reality TV Show in North Macedonia Search for Common Ground North Macedonia April 2020 Skopje i Acknowledgements In the planning and preparation of this report tremendous help, support and guidance was provided by the whole Search team of North Macedonia. Additionally, starting from the planning phase of the research and concluding with the finalization of the report, there has been a continuous cooperation between the local M&E Consultant and Shiva K Dhungana, Senior Regional DM&E Specialist for Asia and North Macedonia. Special thanks to the principles of the primary and high schools across the country that have made it possible for parts of this research with primary and high school students to happen as a result of their readiness for cooperation. © Search for Common Ground Disclaimer The opinions and analyses included in the report are generated from the data collection tools used for this research and are interrelated by the researcher. The opinions or analyses do not represent the opinion or stand US Agency for International Development in North Macedonia. ii Table of Contents Acknowledgements ii Executive Summary iv 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Background 1 2. Methodology 4 2.1. Watch-Party Discussions 4 2.2. Interviews 5 2.3. TV and YouTube Viewership 5 2.4. 3-R Survey 5 2.4.1. Survey Audience 6 2.4.2. Survey Location 6 2.4.3. Sample Size 6 3. Findings 9 3.1. Watch-Party Discussions 9 3.2. TV and YouTube Viewership 11 3.3. Interviews/Interactions 13 3.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Sveti Nikole
    Republic of Macedonia Municipality Sveti Nikole PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT “Reconstruction of streets, water supply and sewerage system and construction of sidewalks and storm water system in the Municipality Sveti Nikole” World Bank Municipal Services Improvement Project Skopje, March 2015 1 The Project’s Appraisal Document was prepared by the Center for Promotion of Sustainable Agricultural Practices and Rural Development – CeProSARD, with the exception of Environmental Impact section prepared by the MSIP consultant Slavjanka Pejcinovska-Andonova CeProSARD Str. Orce Nikolov 172 1000 Skopje, R. Macedonia Tel/fax: + 389 2 3061 391 http://www.ceprosard.org.mk CeProSARD would like to express many thanks for their generous and immense contribution to: WB MSIP team – PMU office, Skopje Mr. Zoran Tasev All representatives from the municipality staff who help in receiving the appropriate documentation All municipality counselors who participate at the interviews All residents who participate at the focus group Skopje, March 2015 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 5 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 General Information on the municipality Sveti Nikole .................................................................................... 8 2.2 Demographic and economic profile ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Sector 1
    Transport Sector Section 2 Identified mature projects Project Project title Project Stage* Loan/ duration(preparat Total investment Grant/ National Co- SR (sector included) (Maturity) (details) Source Project brief description (location included) ion+ cost (€) Source (€) financimg Score TRANSPORT implementation (€) Construction of the rail EBRD To be This project consists of construction works for completing of the 400.000.000 1 section Beljakovce-border railway network in the Corridor VIII, eastern section, between 3 2019-2023 IPA II other defined € 100 with R. Bulgaria Republic of Macedonia and Republic of Bulgaria. IFIs (TBD) IPA II Rehabilitation of road (part 1 of Rehabilitation of road section A2 Kumanovo -Rankovce 2 section Kumanovo- 3 2019-2021 15.000.000 € the whole TBD 100 with length of 31.5 km, on Corridor VIII. Rankovce (Stracin) section) se) Construction of road Consruction of road section A4 Skopje- Kosovo border, a 106.000.000 3 section Skopje- Kosovo 2 2019-2021 EBRD 73.8 part of Route 6A of the SEETO comprehensive network € border Construction of Joint Border Constructed rail border facilities for the Macedonian and 4 2 2019-2021 10.000.000 € WB6 EBRD 97.2 Station Tabanovce Serbian joint border control Reconstruction of road Rehabilitation and reconstruction of national road 5 section from KrivaPalanka – border crossing Deve Bair, Republic of 3 2019-2021 12.000.000 € WB6 EBRD 95.4 KrivaPalanka to Deve Bair Bulgaria, part of Corridor VIII Construction of road section A2 Gostivar- Kicevo with Construction of road Phase1, EBRD length of 44.4 km on Corridor VIII, western section. section 280.000.000 Kicevo- / 6 Construction works are to be divided in 3 sections: 1- 2 2019-2021 TBD 56.5 Gostivar-Kicevo € Bukojcani other KicevoBukojcani, 2- GostivarGornaGjonovica and 3- :WB6 IFIs Bukojcani- GornaGjonovica.
    [Show full text]
  • VOLUNTARY NATIONAL REVIEW North Macedonia July 2020
    VOLUNTARY NATIONAL REVIEW North Macedonia July 2020 North Macedonia ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: Coordination of the process of the National Voluntary Review and contribution to the Review was provided by Ana Jovanovska - Head of unit for Sustainable Development Unit from the Cabinet of Deputy President of the Government in Charge for Economic Affairs and Coordination of Economic Departments. Coordination of data collection and contribution to the Statistical Annex was provided by Snezana Sipovikj - Head of Unit for structural business statistics, business demography and FATS statistics, from the State Statistical Office. Acknowledgments for the contribution to the review: Office of the Prime minister Refet Hajdari The National Academy of Dushko Uzunoski Elena Ivanovska Science and arts Lura Pollozhani Ministry of Economy Chamber of commerce of Ivanna Hadjievska Macedonia Dane Taleski Marina Arsova Ilija Zupanovski Biljana Stojanovska Union of Chambers of Jasmina Majstorovska Commerce Cabinet of the Deputy Bekim Hadziu President in charge for Sofket Hazari MASIT economic affairs Blerim Zlarku Eva Bakalova Ministry of Health The process was supported by: Elena Trpeska Sandra Andovska Biljana Celevska Ksenija Nikolova Elena Kosevska Daniel Josifovski Mihajlo Kostovski Dane Josifovski Ministy of Education Viktor Andonov Filip Iliev Nadica Kostoska Bojan Atanasovski Ministry of Transport and General Secretariat of the Connections Government – Unit for Jasminka Kirkova collaboration with the Civil Society Organizations Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry
    [Show full text]
  • Who North Macedonia Covid-19 Flashupdate 11 July 2020
    WHO NORTH MACEDONIA COVID-19 FLASHUPDATE 11 JULY 2020 COVID-19 in North Macedonia - Update 64 In North Macedonia, from Feb 26 to 10 July 2020, 22:00 CEST, there have been 7,777 confirmed cases of COVID-19 with 368 deaths. NORTH MACEDONIA COVID-19 EPI SITUATION NORTH MACEDONIA COVID-19 HEALTH RESPONSE NORTH MACEDONIA COVID-19 SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACT AND RESPONSE SUPPORT TO NORTH MACEDONIA COVID-19 EMERGENCY WHO SUPPORT TO NORTH MACEDONIA COVID-19 EMERGENCY EUROPE AND WESTERN BALKAN COVID-19 SITUATION WHAT IS [NEW] SUBJECT in FOCUS LEARNING SESSIONS FOR THIS WEEK NORTH MACEDONIA COVID-19 EPI SITUATION Over the last 7 days – Data as of 10 July 2020 22:00 - Daily tests performed ( % positive): Total:9581 (1728 (11.9%), and daily : 1470 (11.4%), 1794 (9.1%), 1367 (8.8%), 894 (8.7%), 1032 (11.1%), 1296 (11.3%) on each day respectively since Saturday). - New cases: 996 (205, 168, 163, 120, 78, 115 and 147 new cases registered on each day, respectively) - Recovered: 1084 COVID-19 patients - Fatalities: 40 new COVID-19 deaths in one week Cumulative registered COVID-19 as of 10 July 22:00 – 7777 (Incidence rate: 388.85 per 100 000 ) – see daily curve - Tests performed: 74 562 SARS-CoV-2 tests. - Patients recovered: 3960 (51%) COVID-19 recovered patients. - Active cases: 3449 (44.3%) COVID-19 active cases - Fatalities: 368 COVID-19 fatalities (CFR 4.7%) registered. - Death Rate per 1 Million Population: 173.7 per 1 000 000 population - Hospitalization: 92 patients are hospitalized at the Clinic for Infectious Diseases of which 59 are on oxygen support and no patients are on respirator.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Characteristics of Some Epicentral Areas in the Vardar Zone
    343 Geologica Macedonica, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 165–169 (2018) GEOME 2 IISSN 0352 – 1206 Manuscript received: May 15, 2018 e-ISSN 1857 – 8586 Accepted: November 17, 2018 UDC: 550.348.436.098.3(497.71) Short communication ENERGY CHARACTERISTICS OF SOME EPICENTRAL AREAS IN THE VARDAR ZONE Blagica Doneva, Todor Delipetrov, Marjan Delipetrev, Gјorgi Dimov, Krsto Blažev Faculty of Natural and Technical Sciences, Institute of Geology, “Goce Delčev” University in Štip, Blvd. Goce Delčev 89, 2000 Štip, Republic of Macedonia [email protected] A b s t r a c t: Seismological phenomena are a natural phenomenon associated with the development of the Earth. They inflict huge damage and cause a large number of human casualties. The territory of the Republic of Macedonia is, seismically, very active part of the Mediterranean area where a large number of earthquakes have occurred. When studying these phenomena, the determination of the energy released during earthquakes is of great importance. This paper deals with the seismic energy of the Vardar zone through the empirical formula for the dependence of the magnitude of the earthquake M and the activated geotectonic surface. Seismicity in Vardar zone is particularly pronounced in the areas of crossing of the reactivated old faults from the Vardar direction with neotectonic faults that predominantly stretch in the transverse direction. Vardar zone is defined as the most labile tectonic unit on the Balkan Peninsula with very expressed seismicity. This paper presents the energetic characteristics of the epicentral areas separated in the Vardar zone: Kumanovo, Skopje, Veles–Sveti Nikole, Štip–Radoviš, Kavadarci and Valandovo.
    [Show full text]
  • Thaumetopoea Pityocampa) in the Republic of North Macedonia During the Period 2007-2017
    Silva Balcanica 21(1): 77–82 (2020) doi: 10.3897/silvabalcanica.21.e54605 RESEARCH ARTICLE Dynamics of populations of pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea pityocampa) in the Republic of North Macedonia during the period 2007-2017 Sterja Nacheski1, Irena Papazova-Anakieva1, Stanislava Lazarevska2, Blagoj Shurbevski1 1 Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Faculty of Forestry, 9 Goce Delcev Blvd., 1000 Skopje, R. North Macedonia 2 Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Food, 9 Goce Delcev Blvd., 1000 Skopje, R. North Macedonia Corresponding author: Sterja Nacheski ([email protected]) Academic editor: M. Georgieva | Received 10 March 2020 | Accepted 12 April 2020 | Published 30 June 2020 Citation: Nacheski S., I. Papazova-Anakieva, S. Lazarevska, B. Shurbevski (2020) Dynamics of populations of pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea pityocampa) in the Republic of North Macedonia during the period 2007- 2017. Silva Balcanica 21(1): 77–82. https://doi.org/10.3897/silvabalcanica.21.e54605 Abstract This study presents results for the dynamic of the populations of the pine processionary moth (Thau- metopoea pityocampa) during the period 2007-2017 and the impact of reducing factors in the Repub- lic of North Macedonia. The population density was determined by the number of larval nests both per tree and per hectare that varied during the research period. The number of individuals went up between 2007 and 2010, while during the following years it rapidly decreased. Since 2011, an overall prograding trend has been recorded in the several subsequent years. This could be explained by the huge number of individuals from the previous years that were in a diapause.
    [Show full text]
  • Angliski Nareden.Qxp
    innovative solutions. innovative on constructively continuingtocollaborate will thatcontinuedsuccess comeonlyfrom remember heorshehasadded.Eachmust success thepieceoflarger for partner istobecongratulated ontotheworldstage.Each thatcanbringtheeconomy aseriesofinnovations for the way paved on. Macedonia andlives inMacedoniabelongsto EconomicDevelopment for iscoming toanend,thePartnership funding activities todate.Although American changedbecauseoftheproject thathave stories oflives theirowneconomicfutures. for theirownresponsibility partners nowrecognize The forms. inmany initiative learnediscollaborative they have approach solving. Themostcritical tojointproblem approaches tolearnandadopteffective together atthenationalandlocallevel worked enterpriseandlaborsectors.Theyhave private thepublic, socialpartners from of key theproject. to fund agreed (USAID) Development International StatesAgencyfor The MacedoniamissionoftheUnited jobs. tonewjobs,andhelpsave jobs,assisttransition tocreate initiative community ofstimulatingindividualand ways ofdoingbusiness.Theseare ofnewways introduction intensive an butrather jobsorquickfixes, short-term afew countries. TheUSDOLmodeldidnotpromise inotherEastEuropean goodresults adjustmentthathadgiven workforce toaddress strategy USDOLtohelpthe countryimplementacomprehensive datamanagement.Itasked to computerized converting like Bureauanditslocaloffices, making somebasicupdatestotheNationalEmployment the upcomingeconomicchanges. toadjust measures labormarket andtouseactive ineconomic development role active
    [Show full text]
  • List of Operators of Balkan Biosert Skopje
    LIST OF OPERATORS BALKAN BIOSERT SKOPJE UPDATED - december-2015 Third Certification Category of MK Law for Organic Equivalent to Bio Contact point for further Nr. Operator’s Name country of Location Type of products Status production Agriculture EEC 834/2007 Suisse information operation МК Закон за Еквивалентно Име на Сертификаци Категорија на Био Контакт за понатамошни Бр.. Трета земја Локација Вид на производ органско со ЕУ операторот онен статус производ Суиссе информации производство Рег.834/2007 Village Krivi Valentina Kolar-Jovanovska, Unprocessed Sande Dol Primary Certified by Balkan Quality manager, 1 Macedonia plant products Organic Dzambazovski Municipality Production Biocert Skopje [email protected] Stip Tel/Fax: +389 23 239 239 Village Krivi Valentina Kolar-Jovanovska, Unprocessed Vanga Dol Primary Certified by Balkan Quality manager, 2 Macedonia plant products Organic Dzambazovska Municipality Production Biocert Skopje [email protected] Stip Tel/Fax: +389 23 239 239 Valentina Kolar-Jovanovska, Unprocessed In conversion Primary Certified by Balkan Quality manager, 3 Dilaver Dema Macedonia Debar livestock products Production Biocert Skopje [email protected] Tel/Fax: +389 23 239 239 Village Valentina Kolar-Jovanovska, Unprocessed Konjuh, Organic in Primary Certified by Balkan Quality manager, 4 Pande Gacovski Macedonia plant products Municipality conversion Production Biocert Skopje [email protected] Kratovo Tel/Fax: +389 23 239 239 Valentina Kolar-Jovanovska, Unprocessed 1.Organic Primary Certified by
    [Show full text]
  • (EUR-OPA) Besafenet 2021 Fact Sheet
    European and Mediterranean Major Hazards Agreement (EUR-OPA) BeSafeNet 2021 fact sheet The European and Mediterranean Major Hazards Agreement (EUR-OPA) is a platform for co-operation between European and Southern Mediterranean countries focusing on major natural and technological disasters. The main objectives of EUR-OPA are to reinforce and promote co-operation between member states in a multi-disciplinary context to ensure better prevention, protection against risks and better preparation in the event of major natural or technological disasters. EUR-OPA currently has 24 member states and it supports in particular projects on education and disaster risk reduction aimed at promoting a culture of prevention, for example through emergency response drills in school establishments together with annual national campaigns. It also provides preventive information and education on how to stem the effects of natural disasters as well as developing a methodology on basic knowledge for schoolteachers on safety activities in emergencies etc. BeSafeNet project The BeSafeNet project was initiated under the umbrella of EUR-OPA to achieve three main goals: 1. Promote a culture of safety among youth: • Raise awareness on the implications of their actions and their perception of emergencies. • Replace fear with a culture of preparedness. 2. Disseminate knowledge to multilingual societies: • Create a common knowledge database of best experience. • Disseminate information in several languages for the benefit of the wider society. 3. Become an interactive tool: • Open the BeSafeNet website to other users and organisations for their benefit and comment. • Enrich its content by contributions based on real-life experiences and information provided by experts. The target is the general public, especially - school teachers and students.
    [Show full text]