Visit of Members of the Gibraltar Parliament

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Visit of Members of the Gibraltar Parliament Visit of Members of the Gibraltar Parliament UK Parliament 23-25 January 2018 Report CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 PROJECT OVERVIEW 3 AIMS & OBJECTIVES 4 PARTICIPANTS 4 KEY STAKEHOLDERS 4 KEY ISSUES 5 RESULTS OF THE PROJECT 8 NEXT STEPS 12 FURTHER RESOURCES 12 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 12 ANNEX A: PROGRAMME OVERVIEW 13 ANNEX B: GIBRALTAR DELEGATION BIOGRAPHIES 15 ANNEX C: SPEAKER BIOGRAPHIES 17 Executive Summary Visit of Members of the Parliament of Gibraltar: Report 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY supported Members in building their capacity to effectively scrutinise public expenditure. It also CPA UK has formed a consortium with the facilitated discussion of other mutual issues and UK National Audit Office (NAO) and the UK priorities such as trade, plans for the UK exiting Government Internal Audit Agency (GIAA) to the European Union, and the Commonwealth. deliver a three-year project of activities to support relevant UK Overseas Territory (UKOT) During meetings over the three days delegates stakeholders. The programme brings together discussed financial scrutiny by individual MPs, parliamentarians and audit officials from the the relationship between MPs and the Auditor- Territories and UK to discuss frameworks for General, the role of the PAC, the operation of PAC good practice and priorities in public financial hearings, scrutiny support available to Members, management. The Project was launched and other areas such as plans for the UK exiting with the CPA UK and UK Overseas Territories the European Union and the Commonwealth. Parliamentary Forum on Public Financial Meetings with the Rt Hon Hilary Benn MP, Chair Management in March 2017. At the Forum, of the Committee on Exiting the European bilateral discussions provided an opportunity to Union, the House of Lords European Union discuss priorities and specific challenges in public Select Committee and the Gibraltar All Party financial oversight and audit. Parliamentary Group allowed for a discussion of Gibraltar’s concerns. The Parliament of Gibraltar does not have a Public Accounts Committee (PAC). Members Delegates recorded significant increases in levels debate the Audit Office’s Report on Government of understanding around the key themes of the Accounts annually and exercise oversight of programme. The programme received extensive the Executive through other tools, primarily local media coverage, helping build awareness questions. The Government set up the about the role and functions of the PAC, and the Commission on Democratic and Political Reform additionality it brings. The delegation identified in 2012. The Commission reported in January a number of areas they were particularly 2013, and its findings did not recommend the interested in, including the relationship that creation of a PAC. exists between UK MPs and the UK Auditor- General. They expressed a desire to see an In light of this, CPA UK organised a programme enhanced relationship between themselves to support Members of Parliament from the and the Gibraltar Audit Office (GAO), including Government and Opposition in enhancing their increased communication between MPs and the oversight role, supporting effective financial GAO, seeing the Gibraltar Audit Office undertake scrutiny outside of the framework of a PAC. The more value for money oriented work, and programme shared approaches between the greater support provided within the Parliament Gibraltar Parliament and UK Parliament on the to Members with analysing and scrutinising oversight of public spending and parliamentary departmental spending. They also identified public financial management. It facilitated a desire to learn more about the composition the sharing of experiences and good practice of other UKOT PACs, the work they undertake, between Members of both parliaments and and the working relationship between Auditor- Generals and other UKOT legislatures. PROJECT OVERVIEW Sacramento, then Assistant Principal Auditor and now Principal Auditor, and Sergio Braz, Assistant 1.01. CPA UK has formed a consortium with Principal Auditor, both of the Gibraltar Audit the UK National Audit Office (NAO) and the Office. UK Government Internal Audit Agency (GIAA) to deliver a three-year project of activities to 1.03. The Parliament of Gibraltar does not support relevant UK Overseas Territory (UKOT) have a Public Accounts Committee; Members stakeholders. The programme brings together debate the Audit Office’s Report on Government parliamentarians and audit officials from the Accounts annually and exercise oversight of Territories and UK to discuss frameworks for the Executive through other tools, primarily good practice and priorities in public financial questions. The Government set up the management. CPA UK’s programme team is Commission on Democratic and Political Reform working in partnership with Territory legislatures in 2012 to examine Gibraltar’s political and and audit institutions to gain insight and electoral system. The Commission reported in expertise to ensure that activities fit the specific January 2013, and its findings did not recommend context and demand of each Territory. the creation of a PAC. 1.02. The Project was launched with the CPA 1.04. Following consultation with various UK and UK Overseas Territories Parliamentary stakeholders, CPA UK organised a three-day Forum on Public Financial Management in visit to Westminster, which was focused on Miami on 1-2 March 2017. As part of the Forum, international good practice in public financial bilateral discussions between PAC Chairs, Auditor management. It offered support to Members Generals, and Heads of Internal Audit, provided of Parliament from the Government and an opportunity to discuss priorities and specific Opposition in enhancing their oversight role, challenges in public financial oversight and audit, supporting effective financial scrutiny outside and convey how the UK Overseas Territories of the framework of a PAC, which the Gibraltar Project (UKOTP) could best support their roles. Parliament does not operate. Gibraltar was represented at the Forum by Tony AIMS & OBJECTIVES & the Gibraltar Savings Bank • Hon. Roy Clinton MP, Shadow Minister for 2.01. Aim: To enable a delegation of Members Public Finance, Inwards Investment, the of the Gibraltar Parliament to build their Gibraltar Savings Bank and Small Business understanding and the capacity of their role in • Hon. Edwin Reyes MP, Shadow Minister for oversight of public spending and public financial Education, Training & Skills, Employment, management. Sports & Leisure, Culture, Public Sector & MOD Industrial Relations 2.02. Objectives: • Hon. Lawrence Llamas MP, Member of a. To share approaches between the Gibraltar Parliament Parliament and UK Parliament on the oversight • Hon. Marlene Hassan Nahon MP, Member of of public spending and parliamentary public Parliament financial management. • Members of the UK Parliament b. To facilitate the sharing of experiences and • Officials of the UK Parliament good practice between Members of the Gibraltar • National Audit Office Parliament and UK Parliament. • Chairs, Members and Clerks of the UK c. Support visiting Members in building Public Accounts Committee and Exiting the their capacity to effectively scrutinise public European Union Committee expenditure d. To discuss other mutual issues and priorities KEY STAKEHOLDERS of the Gibraltar Parliament and UK Parliament, such as trade, Brexit, and the Commonwealth. 4.01. • Gibraltar Parliament (Government and PARTICIPANTS Opposition Members) • CPA Gibraltar 3.01. • CPA UK • Hon. Sir J J Bossano KCMG MP, Minister for • UK Parliament Economic Development, Telecommunications • Gibraltar Government Office, London • Governor’s Office, Gibraltar Financial Scrutiny – Stakeholder Web: Observing the PAC post-hearing private meeting Kevin Foster MP (former PAC Member), financial scrutiny by individual MPs and by the PAC UK PAC – Meeting with Chris Evans MP, 2nd Clerk, and Chair Liaison Scrutiny Unit Observing the PAC Hearing NAO Briefing on how the NAO works with Parliament • and its outputs, including its major reports, short guides, and Value for Money studies. Jennifer KEY ISSUES Brown discussed the five dimensions to the NAO’s work – Financial Audit, Value for Money, 5.01. Financial Scrutiny by Individual MPs Investigations, Support for Parliament and Kevin Foster MP discussed with the delegates the International. mechanisms for financial scrutiny by individual MPs in Westminster. A range of mechanisms Jennifer Brown highlighted that the Auditor exist, including Prime Minister Questions, General and NAO’s Value for Money work where recent scrutiny has included discussion provided an opinion to Parliament on whether of the public contracting of services to Carillion government had secured value for money when following the collapse of this private contractor, spending taxpayers’ money. The Auditor General and the value for money provided through the could examine any area of a public organisation building of government buildings through Private where taxpayers’ money is spent. The NAO could Finance Initiative (PFI) contracts. However, it was also conduct investigations into areas of concern noted that such discussions were often party raised by MPs or others. The Auditor General political. Departmental questions also provided currently meets with the PAC Chair twice a week, an opportunity to scrutinise spending in each and other department Committee chairs once a department, or Treasury questions to scrutinise week, as well as individual MPs. While the Auditor more
Recommended publications
  • The Privatisation of Qinetiq
    House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts The privatisation of QinetiQ Twenty–fourth Report of Session 2007–08 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 12 May 2008 HC 151 Published on 10 June 2008 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Committee of Public Accounts The Committee of Public Accounts is appointed by the House of Commons to examine “the accounts showing the appropriation of the sums granted by Parliament to meet the public expenditure, and of such other accounts laid before Parliament as the committee may think fit” (Standing Order No 148). Current membership Mr Edward Leigh MP (Conservative, Gainsborough) (Chairman) Mr Richard Bacon MP (Conservative, South Norfolk) Angela Browning MP (Conservative, Tiverton and Honiton) Mr Paul Burstow MP (Liberal Democrat, Sutton and Cheam) Rt Hon David Curry MP (Conservative, Skipton and Ripon) Mr Ian Davidson MP (Labour, Glasgow South West) Mr Philip Dunne MP (Conservative, Ludlow) Angela Eagle MP (Labour, Wallasey) Nigel Griffiths MP (Labour, Edinburgh South) Rt Hon Keith Hill MP (Labour, Streatham) Mr Austin Mitchell MP (Labour, Great Grimsby) Dr John Pugh MP (Liberal Democrat, Southport) Geraldine Smith MP (Labour, Morecombe and Lunesdale) Rt Hon Don Touhig MP (Labour, Islwyn) Rt Hon Alan Williams MP (Labour, Swansea West) Phil Wilson MP (Labour, Sedgefield) The following were also Members of the Committee during the period of the enquiry: Annette Brooke MP (Liberal Democrat, Mid Dorset and Poole North) and Mr John Healey MP (Labour, Wentworth). Powers Powers of the Committee of Public Accounts are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 148.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Response to Justice Select Committee's
    Government response to Justice Select Committee’s opinion on the European Union Data Protection framework proposals January 2013 Government response to Justice Select Committee’s opinion on the European Union Data Protection framework proposals Presented to Parliament by the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice by Command of Her Majesty January 2013 Cm 8530 £6.25 © Crown copyright 2013 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or email: [email protected] Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at: [email protected] or 020 3334 5408. This publication is available for download at www.official-documents.gov.uk and on our website at www.justice.gov.uk ISBN: 9780101853026 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID 2533713 01/13 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Government response to Justice Select Committee’s opinion on the European Union Data Protection framework proposals Contents The approach to reforming the current data protection framework 3 The draft Regulation 5 Arguments for and against a Regulation 5 Impact assessment 6 Impact on the Information
    [Show full text]
  • Application for Gibraltarian Status (Section 9)
    H.M. GOVERNMENT OF GIBRALTAR Civil Status and Registration Office Joshua Hassan House 3 Secretary’s Lane Gibraltar APPLICATION FOR GIBRALTARIAN STATUS SECTION 9 OF THE GIBRALTARIAN STATUS ACT BEFORE USING THIS FORM READ THE GUIDANCE NOTES AT THE BACK PLEASE COMPLETE EACH SECTION OF THE FORM IN BLOCK LETTERS AND IN BLACK INK Applicant’s Details (to be filled by all applicants) Surname First Names Date of Birth D D M M Y Y Place of Birth Nationality (tick as appropriate) British British Overseas Territories Citizen Marital Status Date of Naturalisation (if applicable) Address Date of Marriage or Civil Partnership (if applicable) Telephone No. Current Employment email Date of first arrival in Gibraltar Length of residence in Gibraltar Years Family Details Does he/she live in Name Nationality Date & Place of Birth Gibraltar Spouse Yes No Child (1) Yes No Child (2) Yes No Child (3) Yes No Child (4) Yes No Are any of the family members listed above Registered Gibraltarians? Yes No If yes, please give details – DECLARATION I confirm that it is my intention to make my permanent home in Gibraltar. The information given on this form is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I understand that it is a criminal offence to give false information and that I may be prosecuted and fined £1,000, or sent to prison for six months, or both, if I include, or cause to be included, information which I know is false or do not believe to be true. I also understand that the Civil Status and Registration Office holds and uses data in accordance with the Data Protection Act 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 05.Indd
    PART MISCELLANEOUS 5 TOPICS Awards and Honours Y NATIONAL AWARDS NATIONAL COMMUNAL Mohd. Hanif Khan Shastri and the HARMONY AWARDS 2009 Center for Human Rights and Social (announced in January 2010) Welfare, Rajasthan MOORTI DEVI AWARD Union law Minister Verrappa Moily KOYA NATIONAL JOURNALISM A G Noorani and NDTV Group AWARD 2009 Editor Barkha Dutt. LAL BAHADUR SHASTRI Sunil Mittal AWARD 2009 KALINGA PRIZE (UNESCO’S) Renowned scientist Yash Pal jointly with Prof Trinh Xuan Thuan of Vietnam RAJIV GANDHI NATIONAL GAIL (India) for the large scale QUALITY AWARD manufacturing industries category OLOF PLAME PRIZE 2009 Carsten Jensen NAYUDAMMA AWARD 2009 V. K. Saraswat MALCOLM ADISESHIAH Dr C.P. Chandrasekhar of Centre AWARD 2009 for Economic Studies and Planning, School of Social Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. INDU SHARMA KATHA SAMMAN Mr Mohan Rana and Mr Bhagwan AWARD 2009 Dass Morwal PHALKE RATAN AWARD 2009 Actor Manoj Kumar SHANTI SWARUP BHATNAGAR Charusita Chakravarti – IIT Delhi, AWARDS 2008-2009 Santosh G. Honavar – L.V. Prasad Eye Institute; S.K. Satheesh –Indian Institute of Science; Amitabh Joshi and Bhaskar Shah – Biological Science; Giridhar Madras and Jayant Ramaswamy Harsita – Eengineering Science; R. Gopakumar and A. Dhar- Physical Science; Narayanswamy Jayraman – Chemical Science, and Verapally Suresh – Mathematical Science. NATIONAL MINORITY RIGHTS MM Tirmizi, advocate – Gujarat AWARD 2009 High Court 55th Filmfare Awards Best Actor (Male) Amitabh Bachchan–Paa; (Female) Vidya Balan–Paa Best Film 3 Idiots; Best Director Rajkumar Hirani–3 Idiots; Best Story Abhijat Joshi, Rajkumar Hirani–3 Idiots Best Actor in a Supporting Role (Male) Boman Irani–3 Idiots; (Female) Kalki Koechlin–Dev D Best Screenplay Rajkumar Hirani, Vidhu Vinod Chopra, Abhijat Joshi–3 Idiots; Best Choreography Bosco-Caesar–Chor Bazaari Love Aaj Kal Best Dialogue Rajkumar Hirani, Vidhu Vinod Chopra–3 idiots Best Cinematography Rajeev Rai–Dev D Life- time Achievement Award Shashi Kapoor–Khayyam R D Burman Music Award Amit Tivedi.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories in the Brexit Era
    Island Studies Journal, 15(1), 2020, 151-168 The sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories in the Brexit era Maria Mut Bosque School of Law, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Spain MINECO DER 2017-86138, Ministry of Economic Affairs & Digital Transformation, Spain Institute of Commonwealth Studies, University of London, UK [email protected] (corresponding author) Abstract: This paper focuses on an analysis of the sovereignty of two territorial entities that have unique relations with the United Kingdom: the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories (BOTs). Each of these entities includes very different territories, with different legal statuses and varying forms of self-administration and constitutional linkages with the UK. However, they also share similarities and challenges that enable an analysis of these territories as a complete set. The incomplete sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and BOTs has entailed that all these territories (except Gibraltar) have not been allowed to participate in the 2016 Brexit referendum or in the withdrawal negotiations with the EU. Moreover, it is reasonable to assume that Brexit is not an exceptional situation. In the future there will be more and more relevant international issues for these territories which will remain outside of their direct control, but will have a direct impact on them. Thus, if no adjustments are made to their statuses, these territories will have to keep trusting that the UK will be able to represent their interests at the same level as its own interests. Keywords: Brexit, British Overseas Territories (BOTs), constitutional status, Crown Dependencies, sovereignty https://doi.org/10.24043/isj.114 • Received June 2019, accepted March 2020 © 2020—Institute of Island Studies, University of Prince Edward Island, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Scotland: Toward a New Settlement? in This Issue
    | THE CONSTITUTION UNIT NEWSLETTER | ISSUE 38 | JANUARY 2008 | MONITOR SCOTLAND: TOWARD A NEW SETTLEMENT? IN THIS ISSUE The constitutional debate in Scotland in the SNP White Paper) with ideas on reconciling continues apace. In the last Monitor we more devolution with a renewal of the UK BRITISH BILL OF RIGHTS 2 reported on the SNP Government’s White union (which mark out a very different agenda). Paper Choosing Scotland’s Future – Especially notable were her ideas on risk-sharing A National Conversation. This set out options through fiscal solidarity across the UK, and those for Scotland’s constitutional future, ranging on guaranteeing rights of ‘social citizenship’ PARTY FUNDING REFORM 2 from further-reaching devolution to the SNP’s across the UK. Emphasising social rights across own preference of independence. jurisdictions suggests a concern to build common purposes – or, put another way, limits to policy EU REFORM TREATY 3 Beyond their commitment to ignore the SNP’s variation – to which risk-sharing and solidarity can ‘national conversation’, the other main parties be put to work in a UK-wide framework. in Scotland were generally silent on Scotland’s PARLIAMENT 3 constitutional options until a speech by the new This is a bold agenda. For it to work much would Labour leader in Scotland, Wendy Alexander, at depend on a willingness in Westminster and the University of Edinburgh on St Andrew’s Day, Whitehall to think creatively about rebalancing DEVOLUTION 5 30 November. This set out a unionist perspective the union. If devolution is to have a stronger on constitutional change; unlike the SNP White UK-wide context, then the devolved institutions Paper, independence was not an option.
    [Show full text]
  • View Call List PDF File 0.07 MB
    Issued on: 22 September at 6.28pm Call lists for Wednesday 23 September 2020 A list of Members, both virtually and physically present, selected to ask Oral Questions and to speak in response to Urgent Questions and Ministerial Statements; and a list of Members physically present to participate in substantive proceedings. Call lists are compiled and published incrementally as information becomes available. For the most up-to date information see the parliament website: https://commonsbusiness.parliament.uk/ CONTENTS 1. Oral Questions to the Minister for Women and Equalities 1 2. Oral Questions to the Prime Minister 4 3. Urgent Question: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government if he will make a statement on the end of the eviction moratorium 5 4. Ministerial Statement: The Minister for the Cabinet Office on preparations for the end of the transition period 7 5. Overseas Operations (Service Personnel and Veterans) Bill: Second Reading 8 6. Proxy Voting 12 ORAL QUESTIONS TO THE MINISTER FOR WOMEN AND EQUALITIES After prayers Order Member Question Party Virtual/ Minister replying Physical 1 + 2 Debbie Abrahams What assessment she has Lab Physical Minister Tomlinson (Oldham East and made of the effect on disa- Saddleworth) bled people of the covid-19 outbreak. 2 Paul Blomfield What assessment she has Lab Physical Minister Tomlinson (Sheffield Central) made of the effect on disa- bled people of the covid-19 outbreak. 2 Call lists for Wednesday 23 September 2020 Order Member Question Party Virtual/ Minister replying Physical 3 Caroline Nokes Supplementary Con Physical Minister Tomlinson (Romsey and Southampton North) 4 + 5 Claire Coutinho (East What steps she is taking to Con Physical Minister Badenoch + 6 Surrey) encourage girls and young women to take up STEM subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Guide
    A Guide to Brexit Terminology This glossary has been designed to explain some of the key terms used in relation to Brexit. At the end of the glossary are links to additional resources and originals of key documents. The Glossary is not designed to be an exhaustive list and the authors hope that you find the explanations of key terms helpful. The UK which voted to join the EU had a different constitution to the UK that voted to leave the EU. This is reflected by some of the terminology used in the glossary and the inclusion of reference to the legislatures in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N |O| P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | A to Z of Brexit terms February 01 2019 version pg. 1 Advisory The Brexit referendum is often described as ‘only advisory’. The referendum was authorised and conducted under the European Union Referendum Act 2015. It is advisory because Parliament is sovereign and because the Act contained no enabling legislation. Enabling provisions are ones which explicitly state that Parliament is legally bound to implement the outcome of the referendum. Hence, Parliament was not legally obliged to enact the outcome of the Brexit referendum. In contrast, for countries with codified constitutions, the outcome of a referendum ‘may’, in some instances bind both parliament and the government to implement its result. In Britain, however, with an uncodified constitution, it is possible for the government to promise in advance that it would respect the result, but that promise would be only political and not legally binding as parliament cannot be bound be a previous parliament; it can change its mind.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Year 2017-18 (PDF)
    Envelope (Inc. Paper (Inc. Postage (Inc. Grand Total Member of Parliament's Name Parliamentary Constituency VAT) VAT) VAT) Adam Afriyie MP Windsor £188.10 £160.85 £2,437.50 £2,786.45 Adam Holloway MP Gravesham £310.74 £246.57 £3,323.75 £3,881.06 Adrian Bailey MP West Bromwich West £87.78 £0.00 £1,425.00 £1,512.78 Afzal Khan MP Manchester Gorton £327.49 £636.95 £6,885.00 £7,849.44 Alan Brown MP Kilmarnock and Loudoun £238.29 £203.34 £2,463.50 £2,905.13 Alan Mak MP Havant £721.71 £385.00 £7,812.50 £8,919.21 Albert Owen MP Ynys Mon £93.11 £86.12 £812.50 £991.73 Alberto Costa MP South Leicestershire £398.43 £249.23 £3,802.50 £4,450.16 Alec Shelbrooke MP Elmet and Rothwell £116.73 £263.57 £2,240.00 £2,620.30 Alex Burghart MP Brentwood & Ongar £336.60 £318.63 £3,190.00 £3,845.23 Alex Chalk MP Cheltenham £476.58 £274.30 £4,915.00 £5,665.88 Alex Cunningham MP Stockton North £182.70 £154.09 £1,817.50 £2,154.29 Alex Norris MP Nottingham North £217.42 £383.88 £2,715.00 £3,316.30 Alex Sobel MP Leeds North West £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 Alison McGovern MP Wirral South £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 Alister Jack MP Dumfries and Galloway £437.04 £416.31 £4,955.50 £5,808.85 Alok Sharma MP Reading West £374.19 £399.80 £4,332.50 £5,106.49 Rt Hon Alun Cairns MP Vale of Glamorgan £446.30 £105.53 £8,305.00 £8,856.83 Amanda Milling MP Cannock Chase £387.40 £216.72 £4,340.00 £4,944.12 Andrea Jenkyns MP Morley & Outwood £70.14 £266.82 £560.00 £896.96 Andrew Bowie MP W Aberdeenshire & Kincardine £717.92 £424.42 £7,845.00 £8,987.34 Andrew Bridgen MP North West Leicestershire
    [Show full text]
  • Gill Morgan, Is Dealing with Whitehall Arrogance
    plus… Jeff Jones Labour’s leadership election Nicola Porter Journalism must fight back Barry Morgan Religion and politics Dafydd Wigley Options for the referendum Andrew Shearer Garlic’s secret weapon Gill David Culshaw Decline of the honeybee Gordon James Coal in a warm climate Morgan Katija Dew Beating the crunch Gear change for our civil service Andrew Davies The Kafka Brigade Peter Finch Capturing the soul www.iwa.org.uk Winter 2009 No. 39 | £5 clickonwales ! Coming soon, our new website www. iwa.or g.u k, containing much more up-to-date news and information and with a freshly designed new look. Featuring clickonwales – the IWA’s new online service providing news and analysis about current affairs as it affects our small country. Expert contributors from across the political spectrum will be commissioned daily to provide insights into the unfolding drama of the new 21 st Century Wales – whether it be Labour’s leadership election, constitutional change, the climate change debate, arguments about education, or the ongoing problems, successes and shortcomings of the Welsh economy. There will be more scope, too, for interactive debate, and a special section for IWA members. Plus: Information about the IWA’s branches, events, and publications. This will be the must see and must use Welsh website. clickonwales and see where it takes you. clickonwales and see how far you go. The Institute of Welsh Affairs gratefully acknowledges core funding from the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust , the Esmée Fairbairn Foundation and the Waterloo Foundation . The following organisations are corporate members: Private Sector • Principality Building Society • The Electoral Commission Certified Accountants • Abaca Ltd • Royal Hotel Cardiff • Embassy of Ireland • Autism Cymru • Beaufort Research • Royal Mail Group Wales • Fforwm • Cartrefi Cymunedol / • Biffa Waste Services Ltd • RWE NPower Renewables • The Forestry Commission Community Housing Cymru • British Gas • S.
    [Show full text]
  • LGA Vice-Presidents 2017/18
    LGA General Assembly 4 July 2017 LGA Vice-Presidents 2017/18 Purpose of report To invite the General Assembly to note the appointments of Vice-Presidents for 2017/18, under Article 7.2 of the LGA Constitution. Summary This report sets out those Members of the House of Commons, House of Lords and European Parliament that the LGA Political Groups have invited to be Vice-Presidents for 2017/18. Recommendation That the General Assembly notes the appointment of the Members of Parliament, Peers, and Members of European Parliament listed below as Vice-Presidents for 2017/2018. Contact officer: Lee Bruce Position: Head of Public Affairs and Stakeholder Engagement Phone no: 020 7664 3097 E-mail: [email protected] LGA General Assembly 4 July 2017 LGA Vice-Presidents 2017/2018 1. Set out below are the Vice-President appoitments for 2017/18: 2. Conservative 2.1. Charles Walker MP (Broxbourne) 2.2. Margot James MP (Stourbridge) 2.3. Andrea Jenkyns MP (Morley and Outwood) 2.4. Bob Blackman MP (Harrow East) 2.5. Andrew Lewer MP (Northampton South) 2.6. Lord Whitby 2.7. Lord True 2.8. Baroness Eaton 2.9. Baroness Scott of Bybrook 2.10. Julie Girling MEP (South West) 3. Labour 3.1. Clive Betts MP (Sheffield South East) 3.2. Catherine McKinnell MP (Newcastle upon Tyne North) 3.3. Steve Reed MP (Croydon North) 3.4. Wes Streeting MP (Ilford North) 3.5. Catherine West MP (Hornsey and Wood Green) 3.6. John Healey MP (Wentworth and Dearne) 3.7. Angela Rayner MP (Ashton-under-Lyne) 3.8.
    [Show full text]
  • Brexit Referendum in Gibraltar. Result and Effect Northern Ireland7 with the Average Turnout of 70,9%
    Białostockie Studia Prawnicze 2019 vol. 24 nr 1 DOI: 10.15290/bsp.2019.24.01.07 Bartłomiej H. Toszek University of Szczecin [email protected] ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/ 0000-0003-2989-7168 Brexit Referendum in Gibraltar. Result and Eff ect Abstract: Almost complete unanimity of the small Gibraltar community during 2016 referendum on Brexit remained nearly unnoticed because of including this British Overseas Territory into “combined electoral region” with South West England where most of people were in favour of the United Kingdom withdrawing from the European Union. No political diff erences with the UK (i.e. England and Wales) but concern about future possibilities of economic development outside the Single Market stimulated an intense discussion among the Gibraltarians. Th e vision of being non-subject of the EU’s four freedoms (i.e. damage or lost present prosperity basis) would force Gibraltar to re-orientate its economic relations especially by creating and developing new trade links which could gradually replace the existing ones. Despite that Gibraltarians have consequently rejected Spanish proposals of remaining inside the Single Market for the price of sharing sovereignty between the UK and Spain. It is therefore beyond doubt that the people of Gibraltar can be characterised as more British than European. Keywords: Brexit, European Union, Gibraltar, United Kingdom Th e specifi city of Gibraltar’s referendum on Brexit expressed itself not only because it was the fi rst time for any British Overseas Territory (BOT) to participate in the United Kingdom-wide referendum but also because the Gibraltarians were straight included in the decision-making process related to one of the most important question in the UK’s modern history.
    [Show full text]