DOCSLIB.ORG

Annex 4: Theme 2 - Putting People at the Heart of Biodiversity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annex 4: Theme 2 - Putting People at the Heart of Biodiversity Evaluation of Biodiversity 2020 Annex 4: Theme 2 - Putting people at the heart of biodiversity 1 Evaluation of Biodiversity 2020 This report is the copyright of Defra and has been prepared by CEH under contract to Defra. The contents of this report may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor passed to any other organisation or person without the specific prior written permission of Defra. CEH has used reasonable skill and care in checking the accuracy and completeness of information supplied by the client or third parties in the course of this project under which the report was produced. CEH is however unable to warrant either the accuracy or completeness of such information supplied by the client or third parties, nor that it is fit for any purpose. CEH does not accept responsibility for any legal, commercial or other consequences that may arise directly or indirectly as a result of the use by CEH of inaccurate or incomplete information supplied by the client or third parties in the course of this project or its inclusion in this project or its inclusion in this report. 2 Contents List of Abbreviations and Acronyms .............................................................................................. 4 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 Purpose of the evaluation ....................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Overview of Biodiversity 2020 ................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Theme 2 ................................................................................................................................... 7 2 Priority Action 1: People Engagement ................................................................................... 8 2.1 Evaluation framework ............................................................................................................. 8 2.2 Theme 2 Priority Action 1: Key activities ................................................................................. 9 2.3 Q1: Is there increased awareness and improved understanding of the value of biodiversity? 12 2.4 Are more people engaging with the natural environment?.................................................. 17 2.5 Are more people taking positive action for nature? ............................................................. 27 3 Priority Action 2: Biodiversity values incorporated in decision-making ................................ 34 3.1 Evaluation framework ........................................................................................................... 34 3.2 Theme 2 Priority Action 2: Key activities ............................................................................... 35 3.3 Do businesses and organisations have better awareness of green market opportunities? . 37 3.4 Is there guidance and tools to support the integration of natural values in impact assessment?...................................................................................................................................... 47 3.5 Are natural values better integrated into decision-making? ................................................ 57 4 Priority Action 3: Innovative financing mechanisms ............................................................ 71 4.1 Evaluation framework ........................................................................................................... 71 4.2 Theme 2 Priority Action 3: Key activities ............................................................................... 72 4.3 Overview of the main innovating financing mechanism being used in the UK ..................... 74 4.4 Are new tools or innovative mechanisms making a meaningful contribution to funding for nature? ............................................................................................................................................. 76 4.5 Are there some tools or mechanisms that worked better that others and why? ................ 84 5 Priority 2 and 3 Workshop Note ......................................................................................... 95 5.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 95 5.2 Integrating biodiversity values into decision-making ............................................................ 95 5.3 Innovative financing mechanisms ....................................................................................... 103 5.4 Priorities for Defra action .................................................................................................... 107 5.5 Evidence and knowledge sharing ........................................................................................ 107 5.6 Appendix 1: Workshop participant list ................................................................................ 109 5.7 Appendix 2: Evaluation workshop agenda .......................................................................... 110 3 List of Abbreviations and Acronyms BAME Black, Asian and minority ethnic CaBA Catchment Based Approach CBD Convention on Biological Diversity DEFRA Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs EKN Ecosystems Knowledge Network EMTF Ecosystem Markets Task Force HLF Heritage Lottery Fund IFM Innovative Financing Mechanism LEP Local Enterprise Partnership LGS Local Green Space LNP Local Nature Partnership MENE Monitoring of Engagement with the Natural Environment NCC Natural Capital Committee NIA Nature Improvement Area PA Priority Action PEG People Engagement Group PES Payment for Ecosystem Services 4 1 Introduction On behalf of Defra, CEH and ICF undertook an evaluation of Biodiversity 2020. The evaluation is based on a synthesis of existing indicators and evaluative evidence, and a series of expert workshops and interviews. This document presents the evidence base for Biodiversity 2020 Theme 2, Priority Actions a, 2 and 3 – on ‘engaging people in biodiversity and the wider natural environment’, ‘incorporating biodiversity values into decision-making, and ‘innovative funding mechanisms’. 1.1 Purpose of the evaluation In August 2011 Biodiversity 2020 was published, building on the Natural Environment White Paper1, setting out the strategic direction for biodiversity policy in England to 2020 on land (including rivers and lakes) and at sea. In the 25 Year Environment Plan2 the Government committed to publish a new strategy for nature building upon Biodiversity 2020, and to evaluate the current strategy in order to learn lessons that can strengthen the future strategy. The purpose of this evaluation was to assess progress towards the Outcomes set out in Biodiversity 2020 (relating to land and freshwater only), and identify lessons and opportunities to improve delivery in the future (i.e. under a new strategy). Specifically: 1. What progress has been made towards delivering the Strategy Outcomes? 2. What worked and why? Which actions or activities had the greatest benefit in terms of delivering our desired outcomes? And, conversely, what has prevented progress? 3. What lessons can be learned and opportunities identified for furthering progress under a future strategy? 1.2 Overview of Biodiversity 2020 Biodiversity 2020 is a national strategy for England’s wildlife and ecosystem services, implementing the CBD in England. It sets out the Government’s ambition by 2020 ‘To halt overall biodiversity loss, support healthy well- functioning ecosystems and establish coherent ecological networks, with more and better places for nature for the benefit of wildlife and people’, in line with the CBD Aichi Targets. In accordance with the aim to meet the Aichi targets, the Strategy has four intended Outcomes, which relate to habitats and ecosystems on land; marine habitats, ecosystems and fisheries; species; and people: • Outcome 1: Habitats and ecosystems on land: ‘By 2020 we will have put in place measures so that biodiversity is maintained and enhanced, further degradation has been halted and where possible, restoration is underway, helping deliver more resilient and coherent ecological networks, healthy and well-functioning ecosystems, which deliver multiple benefits for wildlife and people’, including: 1https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/228842/ 8082.pdf 2https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/693158/ 25-year-environment-plan.pdf 5 o 1a. Better wildlife habitats with 90% of priority habitats in favourable or recovering condition and at least 50% of SSSIs in favourable condition, while maintaining at least 95% in favourable or recovering condition; o 1b. More, bigger and less fragmented areas for wildlife, with no net loss of priority habitat and an increase in the overall extent of priority habitats by at least 2000 km2; o 1c. By 2020, at least 17% of land and inland water, especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity and ecosystem services, conserved through effective, integrated and joined up approaches to safeguard biodiversity and ecosystem services including through management of our existing systems of protected areas and the establishment of nature improvement areas. o 1d. Restoring at least 15% of degraded ecosystems as a contribution to climate change mitigation and adaptation. • Outcome 2: Marine habitats,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Applications of Machine Learning in Common Agricultural Policy at the Rural Payments Agency
    Applications of Machine Learning in Common Agricultural Policy at the Rural Payments Agency Sanjay Rana Senior GIS Analyst GI Technical Team Reading 1 What are you gonna find out? • Knowing me and RPA (and knowing you - aha ?!) • How are we using Machine Learning at the RPA? – Current Activities – Random Forest for Making Crop Map of England – Work in Progress Activities – Deep Learning for Crop Map of England, Land Cover Segmentation, and locating Radio Frequency Interference • I will cover more on applications of Machine Learning for RPA operations, and less about technical solutions. 2 My resume so far… Geology GIS GeoComputation Academics Researcher & Radio DJ Consultant Civil Servant Lecturer Profession 3 Rural Payments Agency Rural Payments Agency (RPA) is the Defra agency responsible for the distribution of subsidies to farmers and landowners in England under all the EU's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) schemes. 4 Area Based Payments/Subsidies Claim Claim Validation Visual Checks Machine Learning Control Helpline 5 A bit more info on Controls • To calculate correct CAP payments, the RPA Land Parcel Information System (LPIS) is constantly being updated with information from customers, OS MasterMap, Aerial Photographs and Satellite Images. • But, in addition as per EU regulations, claims from approximately 5% of customers must be controlled (i.e. checked) annually. Failure to make correct payments lead to large penalties for Member States. France had a disallowance of 1 billion euro for mismanaging CAP funds during 2009- 2013. • Controls/Checks are done either through regular Field Inspections (20%), or Remotely with Very High Resolution Satellite Images (80%) for specific areas* to ascertain farmer declaration of agricultural (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • This Document Was Withdrawn on 6 November 2017
    2017. November 6 on understanding withdrawn was water for wildlife document This Water resources and conservation: the eco-hydrological requirements of habitats and species Assessing We are the Environment Agency. It’s our job to look after your 2017. environment and make it a better place – for you, and for future generations. Your environment is the air you breathe, the water you drink and the ground you walk on. Working with business, Government and society as a whole, we are makingNovember your environment cleaner and healthier. 6 The Environment Agency. Out there, makingon your environment a better place. withdrawn was Published by: Environment Agency Rio House Waterside Drive, Aztec West Almondsbury, Bristol BS32 4UD Tel: 0870document 8506506 Email: [email protected] www.environment-agency.gov.uk This© Environment Agency All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. April 2007 Contents Brief summary 1. Introduction 2017. 2. Species and habitats 2.2.1 Coastal and halophytic habitats 2.2.2 Freshwater habitats 2.2.3 Temperate heath, scrub and grasslands 2.2.4 Raised bogs, fens, mires, alluvial forests and bog woodland November 2.3.1 Invertebrates 6 2.3.2 Fish and amphibians 2.3.3 Mammals on 2.3.4 Plants 2.3.5 Birds 3. Hydro-ecological domains and hydrological regimes 4 Assessment methods withdrawn 5. Case studies was 6. References 7. Glossary of abbreviations document This Environment Agency in partnership with Natural England and Countryside Council for Wales Understanding water for wildlife Contents Brief summary The Restoring Sustainable Abstraction (RSA) Programme was set up by the Environment Agency in 1999 to identify and catalogue2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Healthy Ecosystems East Anglia a Landscape Enterprise Networks Opportunity Analysis
    1 Healthy Ecosystems East Anglia A Landscape Enterprise Networks opportunity analysis Making Landscapes work for Business and Society Message LENs: Making landscapes 1 work for business and society This document sets out a new way in which businesses can work together to influence the assets in their local landscape that matter to their bottom line. It’s called the Landscape Enterprise Networks or ‘LENs’ Approach, and has been developed in partnership by BITC, Nestlé and 3Keel. Underpinning the LENs approach is a systematic understanding of businesses’ landscape dependencies. This is based on identifying: LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE FUNCTIONS ASSETS The outcomes that beneficiaries The features and depend on from the landscape in characteristics LANDSCAPE order to be able to operate their in a landscape that underpin BENEFICIARIES businesses. These are a subset the delivery of those functions. Organisations that are of ecosystem services, in that These are like natural capital, dependent on the they are limited to functions in only no value is assigned to landscape. This is the which beneficiaries have them beyond the price ‘market’. sufficient commercial interest to beneficiaries are willing to pay make financial investments in to secure the landscape order to secure them. functions that the Natural Asset underpins. Funded by: It provides a mechanism It moves on from It pulls together coalitions It provides a mechanism Benefits 1 for businesses to start 2 theoretical natural capital 3 of common interest, 4 for ‘next generation’ intervening to landscape- valuations, to identify pooling resources to share diversification in the rural of LENs derived risk in their real-world value propositions the cost of land management economy - especially ‘backyards’; and transactions; interventions; relevant post-Brexit.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Common Ground
    Finding common ground Integrating local and national interests on commons: guidance for assessing the community value of common land Downley Common in the Buckinghamshire Chilterns. 25a Bell Street, Henley-on-Thames, Oxon RG9 2BA tel: 01491 573535 fax 01491 573051 e-mail: [email protected] website: www.oss.org.uk (registered in England and Wales, limited company number 7846516, registered charity number 144840) March 2010 with minor revisions January 2013 About this report This work was commissioned by Natural England and funded through its Ma- jor Project on Common Land. The objective of the work, as given in the work specification, is to identify mechanisms to recognise and take account of local community interests on commons, hence complementing established criteria used in assessing national importance of land for interests such as nature con- servation and landscape. The intention is not that community interests should be graded or weighed and balanced against national interests, but rather that they should be given proper recognition and attention when considering man- agement on a common, seeking to integrate local and national aspirations within management frameworks. Specifically, the purpose of the commission was to provide information to enable the user or practitioner to: i be aware of issues relating to the community interests of common land, ii assess the importance of common land to local neighbourhoods, iii engage with communities and understand their perspectives, iv incorporate community concerns in any scheme examining the future and management of commons. The advice and views presented in this report are entirely those of the Open Spaces Society and its officers.
    [Show full text]
  • Lignocellulosic Feedstock in the UK
    Lignocellulosic feedstock in the UK November 2014 A report for the Lignocellulosic Biorefinery Network Authors: Davide Di Maio and David Turley Reviewer: Lucy Hopwood Disclaimer While NNFCC considers that the information and opinions given in this work are sound, all parties must rely on their own skill and judgement when making use of it NNFCC will not assume any liability to anyone for any loss or damage arising out of the provision of this report. NNFCC NNFCC is a leading international consultancy with expertise on the conversion of biomass to bioenergy, biofuels and bio-based products. NNFCC, Biocentre, Phone: +44 (0)1904 435182 York Science Park, Fax: +44 (0)1904 435345 Innovation Way, E: [email protected] Heslington, York, Web: www.nnfcc.co.uk YO10 5DG. 2 Executive Summary NNFCC was commissioned by the Lignocellulosic Biorefinery Network (LBNet) to survey the potential availability of existing domestic lignocellulosic non-food crop feedstock wastes and residues to support the development of UK biorefineries. The objective was to assess the current availability of domestic crop and forest residues; dedicated biomass crops; green waste and waste from the paper industry. Current competing uses for these materials were identified and the potential to expand the resource examined. Impacts of regional and temporal variability were considered and data on costs and composition were collated. The analysis highlighted that the UK has nearly 16 million tons of biomass waste arising from the feedstocks studied. The greatest contributions to this total are from green waste, agricultural straw and a significant amount of waste paper that is currently collected but not recycled in the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • The Availability of Land for Perennial Energy Crops in Great Britain
    GCB Bioenergy (2014) 6, 99–107, doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12147 The availability of land for perennial energy crops in Great Britain ANDREW LOVETT, GILLA SU¨ NNENBERG andTRUDIE DOCKERTY School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK Abstract This paper defines the potentially available land for perennial energy crops across Great Britain as the first com- ponent of a broader appraisal undertaken by the ‘Spatial Modelling of Bioenergy in Great Britain to 2050’ pro- ject. Combining data on seven primary constraints in a GIS reduced the available area to just over 9 M ha (40% of GB). Adding other restrictions based on land cover naturalness scores to represent landscape considerations resulted in a final area of 8.5 M ha (37% of GB). This distribution was compared with the locations of Miscanthus and SRC willow established under the English Energy Crop Scheme during 2001–2011 and it was found that 83% of the planting fell within the defined available land. Such a correspondence provides confidence that the factors considered in the analysis were broadly consistent with previous planting decisions. Keywords: geographical information systems, land availability, land use, landscape sensitivity, perennial energy crops, planting constraints Received 25 May 2013; accepted 4 September 2013 Energy & Climate Change, Department for Environ- Introduction ment, Food & Rural Affairs, Department for Transport, There is a substantial degree of uncertainty regarding 2012; p.77). These feedstocks can take a variety of forms, the long-term development of the global bioenergy sec- including algae, biodegradable wastes and residues, for- tor and the capacity for sustainable increases in biomass estry products and agricultural crops (both food and supply.
    [Show full text]
  • England Tree Strategy Erattum
    Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs England Tree Strategy Consultation - Technical Annex June 2020 Erattum 17th August 2020: The estimate of vacant land on page 11 has been updated to replace an error and explain the source of the estimate on page 12 of the consultation document. Contents Erattum ................................................................................................................................ 1 General background, ............................................................................................................ 1 Expanding and connecting our woods ................................................................................. 3 Ambition ........................................................................................................................... 4 Creating space for nature ................................................................................................. 5 Planting trees for water .................................................................................................... 6 Helping landowners create woodlands ............................................................................. 8 Working together to create landscape scale change ...................................................... 10 Restoring degraded land ................................................................................................ 11 Funding future woodland creation – markets for ecosystem services such as carbon ... 12 Supplying the trees we need to plant and
    [Show full text]
  • Natural England Annual Report and Accounts 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2016
    Natural England Annual Report and Accounts 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2016 www.gov.uk/natural-england Natural England Annual Report and Accounts 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2016 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Paragraph 25 of Schedule 1 to the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006. Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 14 July 2016. HC 381 © Crown copyright 2016 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government- licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected] Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at gov.uk/natural-england Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] Print ISBN 9781474129633 Web ISBN 9781474129640 ID P002794483 07/16 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Contents 1. Performance Report Overview Chief Executive Statement 2 Purpose and activities of the Organisation 4 Key Issues and Risks in delivering objectives 5 Going Concern Statement 6 Performance Summary 7 Performance Analysis Key Performance Indicators and measure of performance 9 Detailed Performance Analysis 14 Sustainability Report 16 2. Accountability Report Corporate Governance Report: Directors’ Report 22 Statement of Accounting Officer’s Responsibilities 24 Governance Statement 25 Remuneration and staff report 30 Parliamentary accountability and audit report Regularity of expenditure 38 Fees and charges 39 The Certificate and Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General 40 3.
    [Show full text]
  • 135. Dorset Heaths Area Profile: Supporting Documents
    National Character 135. Dorset Heaths Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 135. Dorset Heaths Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment White Paper,1 Biodiversity 20202 and the European Landscape Convention,3 we are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas North (NCAs). These are areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which East follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment. Yorkshire & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform West their decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a East landscape scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage Midlands broader partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will West also help to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. Midlands East of Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features England that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each London area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental South East Opportunity (SEOs) are suggested, which draw on this integrated information. South West The SEOs offer guidance on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Address: Tuthill Park, Banbury 14/01671/F Road, Wardington
    Site Address: Tuthill Park, Banbury 14/01671/F Road, Wardington Ward: Cropredy District Councillor: Ken Atack Case Officer: Rebekah Morgan Recommendation: Approval Applicant: Mr Francis Tuthill Application Description: Proposed extension and alterations. Demolish existing greenhouse stores and construct new workshop and ancillary office/administration accommodation; refurbish existing industrial buildings and construct new administration/research and development block. Upgrade and reshape existing hard-standing to form new car parking areas. Committee Referral: Major Committee Date: 22nd January 2015 1. Site Description and Proposed Development 1.1 This application relates to a site on the south-western side of Wardington. It is reached by a long access road off the main Daventry to Banbury A361 road. The access is partially shared with Wardington House Nursing Home, four neighbouring cottages and several Tuthill family properties. 1.2 The majority of the site is outside the Conservation Area, but the access road is within it. A Grade II listed building (Old Farm House) is in close proximity and a public footpath runs along the access road and continues in a westerly direction to the rear of the site. The site is also within an Area of High Landscape Value. 1.3 The site is contained within a larger well-screened site with large mature trees forming all boundaries. The site currently comprises a range of buildings of varying size and height, which have evolved since the 1970’s when Francis Tuthill Ltd established a rally car business. Alongside the Porsche business, the site has previously accommodated a horticultural business and glazing company. Whilst these uses have since ceased a large greenhouse which is currently used for storing parts, and measures 45m x 15m, and the range of other buildings and a large number of storage containers remain.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to Defra
    • Herefordshire O Council Leader of the Council Councillor D Hitchiner Your Ref: MW/Lugg SAC/phosphates Mr. George Eustice MP Our Ref: 010621CCMWDH House of Commons, Please ask for: Councillor D Hitchiner Westminster, Direct line / Extension: 01432 260046 London. SW1A 0AA E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] Tuesday 1st June 2021 Dear Minister, The River Wye Catchment in Herefordshire At our Full Council meeting in March a motion was unanimously supported to request that the executive of Herefordshire Council write to the appropriate government minister to ‘request urgent intervention and immediate resourcing for our statutory agencies to address the issues of flooding and phosphate overload which is ravaging Herefordshire’s economy, ecology and communities’. I would like to take the opportunity to provide some clarity to you on this matter in the very real hope that you will be able to assist us. Phosphates In the latter half of 2019, your Natural England team for our West Midland region wrote to Herefordshire Council advising us of the implications of the recently decided law judgement known as the ‘Dutch judgement’ and how this impacted upon the River Lugg in the north of Herefordshire (a major tributary to the River Wye SAC accounting for 40% of the administrative area of our unitary council). This made reference to how Natural England regarded the ‘Nutrient Management Plan’, which had been collectively drafted in 2014 by the regulatory bodies, was no longer able to provide them with the certainty that this river would meet its favourable condition status by the target year of 2027 - due to phosphate pollution in our river.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 12 NEW FOREST WATERNEWS
    New Forest Catchment Partnership Newsletter July 2021: Issue 12 NEW FOREST WATERNEWS The New Forest Catchment Partnership is coordinated by the New Forest National Park Authority and Freshwater Habitats Trust who are working alongside other organisations and communities to protect and improve the special freshwater habitats of the New Forest. This newsletter showcases the work of those who are committed to improving the freshwater environment of the New Forest. IN THIS ISSUE: THE NEW FOREST NON-NATIVE PLANTS PROJECT The New 1 to 4 WORKING IN PARTNERSHIP TO STOP THE SPREAD OF INVASIVE NON-NATIVE PLANTS Forest Non- Native Plants The aims of the New Forest Non-Native Plants Project (NFNNPP) Project NFNNPP is a partnership project, set up in 2009 to help stop the spread of invasive non- Harvesting More 5 to 8 native plants in the New Forest area, particularly along watercourses and in wetland Than Just Fruit! habitats. It is hosted by Hampshire & Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust (HIWWT) and supported Drainage and 9 by a range of national and local organisations. The two project officers, Catherine Chatters Wastewater Management and Jo Gore, are employed by HIWWT to: Plan Find out where invasive non-native plants are growing in the New Forest area; New Forest 10 Provide advice to landowners and land managers to help them control invasive non- Freshwater and Wetland native plants on their land; Restoration Offer practical help by professional contractors or volunteers to stop the spread of Strategy invasive non-native plants; Species Profile: 11 to 12 Himalayan Commission research into the impacts of invasive non-native plants and methods of Balsam controlling them; Raise awareness about invasive non-native plants and the problems they cause.
    [Show full text]