Galectin-3 Promotes Aβ Oligomerization and Aβ Toxicity in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer’S Disease

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Galectin-3 Promotes Aβ Oligomerization and Aβ Toxicity in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer’S Disease Cell Death & Differentiation (2020) 27:192–209 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-019-0348-z ARTICLE Galectin-3 promotes Aβ oligomerization and Aβ toxicity in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease 1,2 1,3 1 1 1,2 4,5 Chih-Chieh Tao ● Kuang-Min Cheng ● Yun-Li Ma ● Wei-Lun Hsu ● Yan-Chu Chen ● Jong-Ling Fuh ● 4,6,7 3 1,2,3 Wei-Ju Lee ● Chih-Chang Chao ● Eminy H. Y. Lee Received: 1 October 2018 / Revised: 13 April 2019 / Accepted: 2 May 2019 / Published online: 24 May 2019 © ADMC Associazione Differenziamento e Morte Cellulare 2019. This article is published with open access Abstract Amyloid-β (Aβ) oligomers largely initiate the cascade underlying the pathology of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Galectin-3 (Gal-3), which is a member of the galectin protein family, promotes inflammatory responses and enhances the homotypic aggregation of cancer cells. Here, we examined the role and action mechanism of Gal-3 in Aβ oligomerization and Aβ toxicities. Wild-type (WT) and Gal-3-knockout (KO) mice, APP/PS1;WT mice, APP/PS1;Gal-3+/− mice and brain tissues from normal subjects and AD patients were used. We found that Aβ oligomerization is reduced in Gal-3 KO mice injected with Aβ, whereas overexpression of Gal-3 enhances Aβ oligomerization in the hippocampi of Aβ-injected mice. Gal-3 expression shows an age-dependent increase that parallels endogenous Aβ oligomerization in APP/PS1 mice. Moreover, Aβ oligomerization, Iba1 expression, GFAP expression and amyloid plaque accumulation are reduced in APP/ PS1;Gal-3+/− mice compared with APP/PS1;WT mice. APP/PS1;Gal-3+/− mice also show better acquisition and retention performance compared to APP/PS1;WT mice. In studying the mechanism underlying Gal-3-promoted Aβ oligomerization, we found that Gal-3 primarily co-localizes with Iba1, and that microglia-secreted Gal-3 directly interacts with Aβ. Gal-3 also interacts with triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-2, which then mediates the ability of Gal-3 to activate microglia for further Gal-3 expression. Immunohistochemical analyses show that the distribution of Gal-3 overlaps with that of endogenous Aβ in APP/PS1 mice and partially overlaps with that of amyloid plaque. Moreover, the expression of the Aβ-degrading enzyme, neprilysin, is increased in Gal-3 KO mice and this is associated with enhanced integrin-mediated signaling. Consistently, Gal-3 expression is also increased in the frontal lobe of AD patients, in parallel with Aβ oligomerization. Because Gal-3 expression is dramatically increased as early as 3 months of age in APP/PS1 mice and anti-Aβ oligomerization is believed to protect against Aβ toxicity, Gal-3 could be considered a novel therapeutic target in efforts to combat AD. Introduction Senile plaque is one of the two pathological hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and amyloid-β peptides are the Edited by L. Greene major components of senile plaques. Aβ is generated Supplementary information The online version of this article (https:// from sequential and proteolytic cleavages of the amyloid doi.org/10.1038/s41418-019-0348-z) contains supplementary material, precursor protein (APP) by β-secretase and γ-secretase which is available to authorized users. * Eminy H. Y. Lee 4 Faculty of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University School of [email protected] Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan 5 Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans 1 Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan 2 Graduate Institute of Life Sciences, National Defense Medical 6 Neurological Institute, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Center, Taipei, Taiwan Taichung, Taiwan 3 Institute of Neuroscience, National Cheng-chi University, 7 Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang-Ming University Taipei, Taiwan School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan Galectin-3 promotes Aβ oligomerization and Aβ toxicity in a mouse model of. 193 [1]. Individual Aβ42 monomers form soluble oligomers Results of different molecular weight [2], and these oligomers further aggregate to form insoluble Aβ fibrils and amyloid Intra-hippocampal Aβ injection causes Aβ plaques [3]. The evidence indicates that Aβ oligomers oligomerization perturb the integrity of membrane lipid bilayers, increase ion permeability, cause calcium influx and consequently We first examined whether exogenous Aβ injection pro- affect synaptic transmission and neuronal viability [4, 5]. duces Aβ oligomers in the hippocampus. Mice received Conversely, disaggregation of Aβ oligomers decreases intra-hippocampal NH4OH or Aβ injection and were sacri- Aβ-induced inflammation and rescues cognitive deficits ficed 14 days later. Their hippocampal tissues were dis- in APP/PS1 mice [6]. Thus, soluble Aβ oligomers are sected and subjected to Western blot analysis of Aβ believed to represent key structures that produce cyto- oligomerization. Aβ oligomerization was assessed based on toxicity, contribute to synaptic deficits and initiate the the presence of high-molecular weight (HMW) oligomers detrimental cascade involved in the pathology of (>23 kDa) and low-molecular weight (LMW) oligomers AD [5, 7, 8]. Soluble Aβ oligomers are therefore (<23 kDa) [6, 21]. Results revealed that intra-hippocampal considered to be viable drug targets for the treatment Aβ injection produced a significant amount of oligomerized of AD [5, 9]. Aβ in the hippocampus, whereas Aβ in the NH4OH solution Galectin-3 (Gal-3) is a member of the galectin protein (without intra-hippocampal injection) exhibited formation family. The members of this large family of animal lec- of only 2-mer Aβ oligomers (Fig. 1a, b). These results tins interact with other proteins; the carbohydrate recog- demonstrated that the Aβ oligomers seen following exo- nition domain of a galectin recognizes a β-galactoside genous Aβ injection were formed in the brain rather than conjugate on the interacting protein [10], and this inter- being formed in the solution per se. action produces various biological effects [11]. Gal-3 is Next, we examined the level of Aβ oligomerization over present both inside the cell and within the extracellular time after intra-hippocampal Aβ injection. Results indicated space [12]. It exists in the monomer form under soluble that Aβ oligomerization exhibited a time-dependent condition and forms pentamers when bound to the increase in the mouse hippocampus following Aβ injec- β-galactose of an interacting protein [13]. This char- tion. This effect was first apparent at 48 h postinjection and acteristic allows Gal-3 to form bridges among cells it was most significant at 14 days postinjection (Fig. 1c, d). through its multiple binding to β-galactose on different The same results were also found in the rat hippocampus proteins. Gal-3 has been shown to regulate various cel- (Supplementary Fig. S1). lular functions. For example, Gal-3 was found to promote tumor progression [14]; contribute to cell–extracellular Aβ oligomerization is reduced in Gal-3 KO mice matrix adhesion [15]; and promote inflammatory injected with Aβ responses [16, 17]. The serum concentration of Gal-3 is increased in cancer patients, and Gal-3 enhances the Given that Gal-3 was previously shown to enhance cancer homotypic aggregation of cancer cells and enables them cell aggregation [18], we examined whether Gal-3 might to avoid anoikis by interacting with the cancer-associated also facilitate Aβ aggregation. Wild type (WT) and Gal-3 mucin protein, MUC1 [18]. We recently reported that KO mice received Aβ or NH4OH injection to their CA1 area water maze training and contextual fear conditioning and were sacrificed 48 h later. The dissected hippocampal training both decrease Gal-3 expression in the rat hip- tissues were subjected to Western blot analysis of Aβ oli- pocampus, and that memory performance is improved in gomerization and Gal-3 expression. We observed a light Gal-3-knockout (KO) mice [19]. In the context of the background signal and some inter-individual differences in present study, it is notable that the serum level of Gal-3 is the control group. Acute Aβ injection dramatically increased in AD patients [20]. Together, these findings increased both HMW and LMW Aβ oligomerization. The suggest that Gal-3 expression is negatively associated Aβ oligomerization level was also low in Gal-3 KO mice, with memory function under both physiological and which showed some inter-individual differences. Aβ oli- pathological conditions. However, although Gal-3 was gomerization was significantly lower in Gal-3 KO mice reported to enhance cancer cell aggregation [18], it was injected with Aβ compared to WT mice injected with Aβ previously unknown whether Gal-3 affects protein (Fig. 2a, b). Meanwhile, Aβ injection markedly increased aggregation in the brain and/or whether Gal-3 plays a role Gal-3 expression (Fig. 2a, c). in the pathology of AD. Here, we used APP/PS1 mice and Since Aβ oligomerization was reduced in Gal-3 KO mice brain tissues from AD patients to examine the role and injected with Aβ, we hypothesized that overexpression of action mechanism of Gal-3 in Aβ aggregation and amy- Gal-3 would facilitate Aβ oligomerization. To test this loid plaque formation. hypothesis, mice received different combinations of Aβ 194 C.-C. Tao et al. n io a hippocampus t lu ) o n s io ) t d H c O je 4 4 n 1 ) H i ( d N o H 4 n 1 n ( O ( i 4 β ly H β A n (kDa) N A o 180 135 100 b HMW LMW 75 ** 63 HMW 1.4 # 48 oligomer 1.2 35 1.0 IB: Aβ 0.8 25 0.6 20 5 mer 0.4 17 0.2 4 mer Optical density/Actin (fold) 0 3 mer H ta e ) 11 O ) b d 4 d H A 4 4 N (1 2 mer (1 5 Hippocampal 1 mer injection Actin c hippocampus d H 8h d 4 O 6h 4 8 1 (kDa) H 4 β β β β N A A A A 180 135 100 75 d 63 # 6 HMW LMW 48 HMW 5 oligomer # 35 4 IB: Aβ # 25 3 * # 20 5 mer 2 ** 17 4 mer 3 mer 1 Optical density/Actin (fold) 11 0 2 mer H h d O 6h 8 8 4d 4 β 4 β 1 5 H A β A β 1 mer N A A Actin (or NH4OH) and Flag-tagged plasmid injections.
Recommended publications
  • R&D Day for Investors and Analysts
    R&D Day for Investors and Analysts November 16, 2020 Seagen 2020 R&D Day Clay Siegall, Ph.D. Roger Dansey, M.D. Nancy Whiting, Pharm.D Megan O’Meara, M.D. Shyra Gardai, Ph.D. President & Chief Chief Medical Officer EVP, Corporate Strategy VP, Early Stage Executive Director, Executive Officer Alliances and Development Immunology Communications 2 Forward-Looking Statements Certain of the statements made in this presentation are forward looking, such as those, among others, relating to the Company’s potential to achieve the noted development and regulatory milestones in 2021 and in future periods; anticipated activities related to the Company’s planned and ongoing clinical trials; the potential for the Company’s clinical trials to support further development, regulatory submissions and potential marketing approvals in the U.S. and other countries; the opportunities for, and the therapeutic and commercial potential of ADCETRIS, PADCEV, TUKYSA, tisotumab vedotin and ladiratuzumab vedotin and the Company’s other product candidates and those of its licensees and collaborators; the potential to submit a BLA for accelerated approval of tisotumab vedotin; the potential for data from the EV-301 and EV-201 cohort 2 clinical trials to support additional regulatory approvals of PADCEV; the potential for the approval of TUKYSA by the EMA; the therapeutic potential of the Company’s SEA technology and of the Company’s early stage pipeline agents including SGN-B6A, SGN-STNV, SGN-CD228A, SEA-CD40, SEA-TGT, SEA-BCMA and SEA-CD70; as well as other statements that are not historical fact. Actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected or implied in these forward-looking statements.
    [Show full text]
  • CAR- T Cell Immunotherapies
    CAR T Therapy Current Status Future Challenges Introduction Basics of CAR T Therapy Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes are Specific and Potent Effector Cells Ultrastructure of CTL-mediated apoptosis The CTL protrudes deeply into cytoplasm of melanoma cell 3 Peter Groscurth, and Luis Filgueira Physiology 1998;13:17-21 What is CAR T Therapy? • CAR T therapy is the name given to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) genetically modified T cells that are designed to recognize specific antigens on tumor cells resulting in their activation and proliferation eventually resulting in significant and durable destruction of malignant cells • CAR T cells are considered “a living drug” since they tend to persist for long periods of time • CAR T cells are generally created from the patients own blood cells although this technology is evolving to develop “off the shelf” CAR T cells 4 CAR T cells: Mechanism of Action T cell Tumor cell CAR enables T cell to Expression of recognize tumor cell antigen CAR Viral DNA Insertion Antigen Tumor cell apoptosis CAR T cells multiply and release cytokines 5 Chimeric Antigen Receptors Antigen binding VH Antigen Binding Domain domain scFv Single-chain variable fragment (scFv) bypasses MHC antigen presentation, allowing direct activation of T cell by cancer cell antigens VL Hinge region Hinge region Essential for optimal antigen binding Costimulatory Domain: CD28 or 4-1BB Costimulatory Enhances proliferation, cytotoxicity and domain persistence of CAR T cells Activation Domains Signaling Domain: CD3-zeta chain CD3-zeta chain Proliferation
    [Show full text]
  • MUC1-C Oncoprotein As a Target in Breast Cancer: Activation of Signaling Pathways and Therapeutic Approaches
    Oncogene (2013) 32, 1073–1081 & 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0950-9232/13 www.nature.com/onc REVIEW MUC1-C oncoprotein as a target in breast cancer: activation of signaling pathways and therapeutic approaches DW Kufe Mucin 1 (MUC1) is a heterodimeric protein formed by two subunits that is aberrantly overexpressed in human breast cancer and other cancers. Historically, much of the early work on MUC1 focused on the shed mucin subunit. However, more recent studies have been directed at the transmembrane MUC1-C-terminal subunit (MUC1-C) that functions as an oncoprotein. MUC1-C interacts with EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor), ErbB2 and other receptor tyrosine kinases at the cell membrane and contributes to activation of the PI3K-AKT and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK)-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathways. MUC1-C also localizes to the nucleus where it activates the Wnt/b-catenin, signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) and NF (nuclear factor)-kB RelA pathways. These findings and the demonstration that MUC1-C is a druggable target have provided the experimental basis for designing agents that block MUC1-C function. Notably, inhibitors of the MUC1-C subunit have been developed that directly block its oncogenic function and induce death of breast cancer cells in vitro and in xenograft models. On the basis of these findings, a first-in-class MUC1-C inhibitor has entered phase I evaluation as a potential agent for the treatment of patients with breast cancers who express this oncoprotein. Oncogene (2013) 32, 1073–1081; doi:10.1038/onc.2012.158; published online 14 May 2012 Keywords: MUC1; breast cancer; oncoprotein; signaling pathways; targeted agents INTRODUCTION In breast tumor cells with loss of apical–basal polarity, the The mucin (MUC) family of high-molecular-weight glycoproteins MUC1-N/MUC1-C complex is found over the entire cell mem- 2 8 evolved in metazoans to provide protection for epithelial cell brane.
    [Show full text]
  • Membrane-Bound Mucins: the Mechanistic Basis for Alterations in the Growth and Survival of Cancer Cells
    Oncogene (2010) 29, 2893–2904 & 2010 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0950-9232/10 $32.00 www.nature.com/onc REVIEW Membrane-bound mucins: the mechanistic basis for alterations in the growth and survival of cancer cells S Bafna1, S Kaur1 and SK Batra1,2 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA and 2Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA Mucins (MUC) are high molecular weight O-linked tethered mucins are quite distinct from the classic glycoproteins whose primary functions are to hydrate, extracellular complex mucins forming the mucous layers protect, and lubricate the epithelial luminal surfaces of the of the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts. These ducts within the human body. The MUC family is epithelial membrane-tethered mucins are the transmem- comprised of large secreted gel forming and transmem- brane (TM) molecules, expressed by most glandular and brane (TM) mucins. MUC1, MUC4, and MUC16 are the ductal epithelial cells (Taylor-Papadimitriou et al., well-characterized TM mucins and have been shown to be 1999). Several TM mucins (MUC1, MUC3A, MUC3B, aberrantly overexpressed in various malignancies includ- MUC4, MUC 12, MUC13, MUC15, MUC16, MUC17, ing cystic fibrosis, asthma, and cancer. Recent studies MUC20, and MUC21) (human mucins are designated have uncovered the unique roles of these mucins in the as MUC, whereas other species mucins are designated as pathogenesis of cancer. These mucins possess specific Muc) have been identified so far (Moniaux et al., 2001; domains that can make complex associations with various Chaturvedi et al., 2008a; Itoh et al., 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • (EMA) Is Preferentially Expressed by ALK Positive Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, in The
    J Clin Pathol 2001;54:933–939 933 MUC1 (EMA) is preferentially expressed by ALK positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma, in the normally glycosylated or only partly J Clin Pathol: first published as on 1 December 2001. Downloaded from hypoglycosylated form R L ten Berge*, F G M Snijdewint*, S von MensdorV-Pouilly, RJJPoort-Keesom, J J Oudejans, J W R Meijer, R Willemze, J Hilgers, CJLMMeijer Abstract 30–50% of cases, a chromosomal aberration Aims—To investigate whether MUC1 such as the t(2;5)(p23;q35) translocation gives mucin, a high molecular weight trans- rise to expression of the anaplastic lymphoma membrane glycoprotein, also known as kinase (ALK) protein,2 identifying a subgroup epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), dif- of patients with systemic ALCL with excellent fers in its expression and degree of glyco- prognosis.3–6 ALK expression seems specific for sylation between anaplastic large cell systemic nodal ALCL; it is not found in classic lymphoma (ALCL) and classic Hodgkin’s Hodgkin’s disease (HD)7–11 or primary cutane- disease (HD), and whether MUC1 ous ALCL.7101213Morphologically, these lym- immunostaining can be used to diVerenti- phomas may closely resemble systemic ALCL, ate between CD30 positive large cell being also characterised by CD30 positive lymphomas. tumour cells with abundant cytoplasm, large Methods/Results—Using five diVerent irregular nuclei, and a prominent single monoclonal antibodies (E29/anti-EMA, nucleolus or multiple nucleoli.1 Clinically, DF3, 139H2, VU-4H5, and SM3) that however, classic HD and primary cutaneous distinguish between various MUC1 glyco- ALCL have a more favourable prognosis than 12 14–16 Department of forms, high MUC1 expression (50–95% of ALK negative systemic ALCL.
    [Show full text]
  • Epithelial Mucin-1 (MUCI) Expression and MA5 Anti-MUC1 Monoclonal Antibody Targeting in Multiple Myeloma I
    Vol. 5, 3065s-3072s, October 1999 (Suppl.) Clinical Cancer Research 3065s Epithelial Mucin-1 (MUCI) Expression and MA5 Anti-MUC1 Monoclonal Antibody Targeting in Multiple Myeloma I J. Burton, z D. Mishina, T. Cardillo, K. Lew, cGy/mCi of injected dose compared with 3099 cGy/mCi of A. Rubin, D. M. Goldenberg, and D. V. Gold tumor-absorbed dose delivered by nonspecific antibody. Garden State Cancer Center, Belleville, New Jersey 07109 [J. B., D. M., T. C., K. L., D. M. G., D. V. G.], and St. Joseph's Hospital and Introduction Medical Center, Paterson, New Jersey 07503 [A. R.] MM 3 is a B-cell malignancy that appears to result from the transformation and monoclonal expansion of a cell with char- acteristics of a plasma cell, i.e., a terminally differentiated B cell Abstract (1, 2). The expression by MM cells of certain non-B-cell anti- Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common gens also raises the possibility of the transformation of an hematological cancer in the United States. It is typically earlier, more multipotent lymphoid precursor cell. As with nor- incurable, even with myeloablative chemotherapy and stem- mal plasma cells, this degree of terminal differentiation is as- cell transplantation. The epithelial mucin-1 (MUC1) glyco- sociated with the complete or partial loss of certain B-cell- protein is expressed by normal and malignant epithelial cells associated antigens, such as surface immunoglobulin and CDs but has also been shown to be expressed by MM cells. MUC1 19-22 (CD19 is expressed on normal plasma cells; Ref. 3).
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization and Function of Medium and Large Extracellular
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/623553; this version posted April 30, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Characterization and function of medium and large extracellular vesicles from plasma and urine by surface antigens and Annexin V Ko Igami1, 2, 3, Takeshi Uchiumi1*, Saori Ueda1, Kazuyuki Kamioka2, 4, Daiki Setoyama1, Kazuhito Gotoh1, Masaru Akimoto1, Shinya Matsumoto1 and Dongchon Kang1 1Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan. 2Kyushu Pro Search Limited Liability Partnership, 4-1, Kyudaishimmachi, Nishi- ku, Fukuoka, 819-0388, Japan. 3Business Management Division, Clinical Laboratory Business Segment, LSI Medience Corporation, 13-4, Uchikanda 1-chome, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 101-8517, Japan. 4Medical Solutions Department, LSI Medience Corporation, 3- 30-1, Shimura, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 174-8555, Japan. Running title: Characterization of plasma and urine extracellular microvesicles Keywords: microvesicle, cell-derived microvesicle, peptidase, plasma, urine *Correspondence to: Takeshi Uchiumi, Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan. Tel: (+81) 92-642-5750; Fax: (+81) 92-642-5772 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/623553; this version posted April 30, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Urinary Exosomes As Innate Immune Effectors
    BASIC RESEARCH www.jasn.org Human Urinary Exosomes as Innate Immune Effectors † † ‡ Thomas F. Hiemstra,* Philip D. Charles, Tannia Gracia, Svenja S. Hester,§ † ‡ | Laurent Gatto, Rafia Al-Lamki,* R. Andres Floto,* Ya Su, Jeremy N. Skepper, † ‡ Kathryn S. Lilley, and Fiona E. Karet Frankl *Department of Medicine, †Cambridge Centre for Proteome Research and Cambridge Systems Biology Centre, Department of Biochemistry, ‡Department of Medical Genetics, and |Multi-Imaging Centre, Department of Anatomy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; and §Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom ABSTRACT Exosomes are small extracellular vesicles, approximately 50 nm in diameter, derived from the endocytic pathway and released by a variety of cell types. Recent data indicate a spectrum of exosomal functions, including RNA transfer, antigen presentation, modulation of apoptosis, and shedding of obsolete protein. Exosomes derived from all nephron segments are also present in human urine, where their function is unknown. Although one report suggested in vitro uptake of exosomes by renal cortical collecting duct cells, most studies of human urinary exosomes have focused on biomarker discovery rather than exosome function. Here, we report results from in-depth proteomic analyses and EM showing that normal human urinary exosomes are significantly enriched for innate immune proteins that include antimicrobial proteins and peptides and bacterial and viral receptors. Urinary exosomes, but not the prevalent soluble urinary protein uromodulin (Tamm–Horsfall protein), potently inhibited growth of pathogenic and commensal Escherichia coli and induced bacterial lysis. Bacterial killing depended on exosome structural integrity and occurred optimally at the acidic pH typical of urine from omnivorous humans.
    [Show full text]
  • Modulation of MUC1 Mucin As an Escape Mechanism of Breast Cancer Cells from Autologous Cytotoxic T-Lymphocytes
    British Journal of Cancer (2001) 84(9), 1258–1264 © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign doi: 10.1054/ bjoc.2001.1744, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on http://www.bjcancer.com Modulation of MUC1 mucin as an escape mechanism of breast cancer cells from autologous cytotoxic T-lymphocytes K Kontani1, O Taguchi1, T Narita1, M Izawa1, N Hiraiwa1, K Zenita1, T Takeuchi2, H Murai2, S Miura2 and R Kannagi1 1Program of Molecular Pathology and 2Department of Breast Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center, 1–1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464–8681, Japan Summary MUC1 mucin is known to serve as a target molecule in the killing of breast cancer cells by cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs). We searched for a possible mechanism allowing tumour cells to escape from autologous CTLs. When the killing of breast cancer cells by autologous lymphocytes was examined in 26 patients with breast cancer, significant tumour cell lysis was observed in 8 patients, whereas virtually no autologous tumour cell lysis was detected in as many as 18 patients. In the patients who showed negligible tumour cell lysis, the autologous tumour cells expressed MUC1-related antigenic epitopes much more weakly than the tumour cells in the patients who exhibited strong cytotoxicity (significant statistically at P < 0.0005–0.0045), suggesting that the unresponsiveness of cancer cells to CTLs observed in these patients was mainly due to loss of MUC1 expression or modulation of its antigenicity. A breast cancer cell line, NZK-1, established from one of the cytotoxicity- negative patients, did not express MUC1 and was resistant to killing by CTLs, while control breast cancer cell lines expressing MUC-1 were readily killed by CTLs.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthetic MUC1 Breast Cancer Vaccine Containing a Toll‑Like Receptor 7 Agonist Exerts Antitumor Effects
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS 20: 2369-2377, 2020 Synthetic MUC1 breast cancer vaccine containing a Toll‑like receptor 7 agonist exerts antitumor effects YU LIU1,2*, LI TANG1,3*, NINGNING GAO1, YUWEN DIAO1, JINGJING ZHONG1, YONGQIANG DENG4, ZHULIN WANG1, GUANGYI JIN1 and XIAODONG WANG1 1International Cancer Center, National-Regional Engineering Lab for Synthetic Biology of Medicine, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055; 2Department of Research and Education, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518001;3 College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Devices and Systems of The Ministry of Education and Guangdong Province, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518060; 4Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, P.R. China Received January 14, 2020; Accepted May 27, 2020 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2020.11762 Abstract. Adjuvant immunotherapy has recently emerged immunity, including high antibody titers, antibody-dependent as a potential treatment strategy for breast cancer. The cell-mediated cytotoxicity and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte tumor-associated protein mucin 1 (MUC1) has received activity. The percentages of CD3+/CD8+ T‑cells were signifi- increasing attention due to its high expression in numerous cantly higher in the T7-MUC1 treatment group compared with types of common tumors, in which MUC1 acts as a cancer those in the control group. Therefore, the results of the present antigen. However, the simple mixed composition of an adju- study suggested that the T7-MUC1 vaccine inhibited tumor vant and a peptide is not a sufficient rationale for a MUC1 growth in mice and thus may have potential as a therapeutic peptide-based vaccine.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential of Anti-MUC1 Antibodies As a Targeted Therapy for Gastrointestinal Cancers
    Review Potential of Anti-MUC1 Antibodies as a Targeted Therapy for Gastrointestinal Cancers Mukulika Bose * and Pinku Mukherjee Department of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 September 2020; Accepted: 3 November 2020; Published: 5 November 2020 Abstract: Gastrointestinal cancers (GI) account for 26% of cancer incidences globally and 35% of all cancer-related deaths. The main challenge is to target cancer specific antigens. Mucins are heavily O-glycosylated proteins overexpressed in different cancers. The transmembrane glycoprotein MUC1 is the most likeable target for antibodies, owing to its specific overexpression and aberrant glycosylation in many types of cancers. For the past 30 years, MUC1 has remained a possible diagnostic marker and therapeutic target. Despite initiation of numerous clinical trials, a comprehensively effective therapy with clinical benefit is yet to be achieved. However, the interest in MUC1 as a therapeutic target remains unaltered. For all translational studies, it is important to incorporate updated relevant research findings into therapeutic strategies. In this review we present an overview of the antibodies targeting MUC1 in GI cancers, their potential role in immunotherapy (i.e., antibody-drug and radioimmunoconjugates, CAR-T cells), and other novel therapeutic strategies. We also present our perspectives on how the mechanisms of action of different anti-MUC1 antibodies can target specific hallmarks of cancer and therefore be utilized as a combination therapy for better clinical outcomes. Keywords: MUC1; immunotherapy; monoclonal antibody; gastrointestinal cancers; CAR-T cells 1. Global Burden of GI Cancers Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers collectively refer to cancers of the esophagus and stomach (gastroesophageal cancers), the colon and rectum (colorectal cancers), pancreas, liver, gallbladder, small intestine, appendix, and anus.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-CD70 Antibody-Drug Conjugates and Their Use for the Treatment of Cancer and Immune Disorders
    (19) *EP002100619A1* (11) EP 2 100 619 A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION (43) Date of publication: (51) Int Cl.: 16.09.2009 Bulletin 2009/38 A61K 47/48 (2006.01) A61K 39/395 (2006.01) A61P 35/00 (2006.01) A61P 37/00 (2006.01) (2006.01) (21) Application number: 09004484.3 C07K 16/28 (22) Date of filing: 20.02.2004 (84) Designated Contracting States: • Wahl, Alan, F. AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR Mercer Island HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR WA 98020 (US) Designated Extension States: • Scholler, Nathalie AL LT LV MK Seattle WA 98107 (US) (30) Priority: 20.02.2003 US 449055 P • Pestano, Linda Oro Valley (62) Document number(s) of the earlier application(s) in AZ 85737 (US) accordance with Art. 76 EPC: 04713441.6 / 1 594 542 (74) Representative: Roques, Sarah Elizabeth J.A. Kemp & Co. (71) Applicant: Seattle Genetics, Inc. 14 South Square Bothell, WA 98021 (US) Gray’s Inn London WC1R 5JJ (GB) (72) Inventors: • Law, Che-Leung Remarks: Shoreline This application was filed on 27-03-2009 as a WA 98133 (US) divisional application to the application mentioned under INID code 62. (54) Anti-CD70 antibody-drug conjugates and their use for the treatment of cancer and immune disorders (57) Disclosed are anti-CD70 antibodies and deriv- methods, for the treatment of CD70-expressing cancers atives thereof conjugated to cytotoxic, immunosuppres- and immunological disorders, comprising administering sive, or other therapeutic agents, as well as pharmaceu- to a subject the disclosed pharmaceutical compositions.
    [Show full text]