Monitoring Forest Phenology in a Changing World

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Monitoring Forest Phenology in a Changing World Review Monitoring Forest Phenology in a Changing World Ross E. J. Gray * and Robert M. Ewers Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Buckhurst Road, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7PY, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Plant phenology is strongly interlinked with ecosystem processes and biodiversity. Like many other aspects of ecosystem functioning, it is affected by habitat and climate change, with both global change drivers altering the timings and frequency of phenological events. As such, there has been an increased focus in recent years to monitor phenology in different biomes. A range of approaches for monitoring phenology have been developed to increase our understanding on its role in ecosystems, ranging from the use of satellites and drones to collection traps, each with their own merits and limitations. Here, we outline the trade-offs between methods (spatial resolution, temporal resolution, cost, data processing), and discuss how their use can be optimised in different environments and for different goals. We also emphasise emerging technologies that will be the focus of monitoring in the years to follow and the challenges of monitoring phenology that still need to be addressed. We conclude that there is a need to integrate studies that incorporate multiple monitoring methods, allowing the strengths of one to compensate for the weaknesses of another, with a view to developing robust methods for upscaling phenological observations from point locations to biome and global scales and reconciling data from varied sources and environments. Such developments are needed if we are to accurately quantify the impacts of a changing world on plant phenology. Keywords: drones; ecosystem change; methods; monitoring; phenology; remote sensing; UAVs Citation: Gray, R.E.J.; Ewers, R.M. Monitoring Forest Phenology in a Changing World. Forests 2021, 12, 297. 1. Introduction https://doi.org/10.3390/f12030297 Phenology is the study of the timing of recurrent biological events (or phenophases), the causes of these timings in regard to the biotic and abiotic drivers, and the connection Academic Editor: Luisa Frati among phases of the same or different species [1]. Here, phenology is defined by both describing observable events and also by describing the links and cascading indirect Received: 1 February 2021 effects that phenological events can have on an ecosystem [2]. This obvious interrelation Accepted: 2 March 2021 of phenology with so many aspects of an ecosystem is why it was hardly considered Published: 5 March 2021 a scientific discipline until the 1900s [3], despite the recording of phenological events dating back thousands of years [4] (Figure1). Nevertheless, the connection of phenology Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in with multiple facets of the ecosystem makes monitoring it critical for developing our published maps and institutional affil- understanding of ecological processes and for managing resources in the face of climate iations. and habitat change [5,6]. As such, there has been a rapid acceleration in the study of phenology and the associated development of new methods and technologies to aid this endeavour (Figure1). The past two decades in particular have seen increased effort to build interdisciplinary phenological research frameworks that utilise developments in technology to monitor phenology and its links with ecosystem function across species, Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. space and time [4,6,7]. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). Forests 2021, 12, 297. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12030297 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/forests Forests 2021, 12, 297 2 of 24 Forests 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 24 Figure 1. Timeline history of monitoring phenology. References for the specific time periods are: pre-1700 [4], 1700s [8], 1853Figure [9], 1900s 1. Timeline [10,11 ],history 1920s of [12 monitoring], 1950s [13 phenolo], 1960sgy. [14 ,References15], 1965-83 for [16 the–19 sp],ecific 1900s time [20 ],periods 2003 [ 21are:], 2000spre-1700 [3, 22[4],], 20071700s [ 23[8],,24 ], 1853 [9], 1900s [10,11], 1920s [12], 1950s [13], 1960s [14,15], 1965-83 [16–19], 1900s [20], 2003 [21], 2000s [3,22], 2007 [23,24], 2012 [2,25–27], 2016 [28,29], and 2020 [30]. 2012 [2,25–27], 2016 [28,29], and 2020 [30]. 1.1.1.1. The The Ubiquitous Ubiquitous ImportanceImportance of Plant Plant Phenology Phenology MostMost biologicalbiological organisms organisms foll followow certain certain life life cycle cycle events events,, but plant but plant phenology phenology is ar- is guably the most studied. Plant phenology includes processes such as leaf emergence, arguably the most studied. Plant phenology includes processes such as leaf emergence, flowering, fruiting, seeding and leaf senescence, and these processes link strongly to eco- flowering, fruiting, seeding and leaf senescence, and these processes link strongly to system function and services (Figure 2; [6,31]). Therefore, change to phenological events ecosystem function and services (Figure2;[ 6,31]). Therefore, change to phenological events may have implications for biogeochemical cycles, including that of carbon [32], and for may have implications for biogeochemical cycles, including that of carbon [32], and for the population dynamics of species connected at different trophic levels or in competitive the population dynamics of species connected at different trophic levels or in competitive and mutualistic interactions [33,34]. Plant phenology can further force temporal shifts in and mutualistic interactions [33,34]. Plant phenology can further force temporal shifts in animal phenology [22,35], with the potential for phenological mismatching if the species animalinvolved phenology do not respond [22,35], similarly with the to potential environmental for phenological changes [35,36]. mismatching if the species involvedLeaf do emergence not respond (flush) similarly phenology to environmental (the presence changesof new leaves [35,36 ].on a tree canopy) is particularlyLeaf emergence important, (flush) as it directly phenology controls (the processes presence such of new as primary leaves onproductivity, a tree canopy) car- is particularlybon sequestration, important, nutrient as it directlycycling, controls water storage, processes and such competition as primary and productivity, coexistence carbondy- sequestration,namics (Figure nutrient 2; [37–42]). cycling, For example, water storage, when canopy and competition trees flush and their coexistence leaves it alters dynamics the (Figurewater and2;[ 37light–42 environments]). For example, for coexisting when canopy organisms trees flushby intercepting their leaves more it altersof the theincom- water anding lightsolar environmentsradiation and reducing for coexisting throughfall organisms from precipitation, by intercepting increasing more ofsoil the water incoming up- solartake radiationand consequently and reducing reducing throughfall soil water from and precipitation, soil water evaporation increasing rates soil water (Figure uptake 2; and[38,43]). consequently Indirectly, reducing leaf flush soil can water alter and the soilpresence water of evaporation herbivorous rates insects (Figure and2 ;[conse-38,43]). Indirectly,quently shift leaf the flush presence can alter of the insectivorous presence of birds herbivorous and mammals insects (Figure and consequently 2). For instance, shift the presencephenological of insectivorous change of oil-seed birds and crops mammals has resulted (Figure in 2changes). For instance, in the abundance phenological and changetype ofof oil-seed herbivorous crops insects has resulted present in in changes agricultural in the landscapes, abundance inand turn type causing of herbivorous diet shifts in insects in- presentsectivorous in agricultural birds [44]. There landscapes, is also a infeedback turn causing loop to dietthis process: shifts in some insectivorous plant species birds aim [44 ]. Thereto reduce is also herbivory a feedback by loopaltering to thistheir process: phenolog someical plantactivity species to flush aim before to reduce insects herbivory emerge, by alteringor by synchronising their phenological their leaf activity flushing to flush with before other plant insects species emerge, to reduce or by synchronising herbivory pres- their leafsure flushing [31]. Tropical with otherplants plant that flush species their to leaves reduce later herbivory in the season pressure can suffer [31]. Tropicalsignificantly plants thathigher flush damage their leaves by insects later compared in the season to those can sufferthat flush significantly early or in higher synchrony damage during by insectsthe comparedpeak flushing to those phase that [45]. flush This earlyis not oralways in synchrony the case in during temperate the regions peak flushing however, phase where [45 ]. This is not always the case in temperate regions however, where variation in leaf flush timing involves ecological trade-offs. For example, some Oak species (Quercus spp.) in Eastern Europe flush early in the season to avoid summer droughts but consequently Forests 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 24 Forests 2021, 12, 297 3 of 24 variation in leaf flush timing involves ecological trade-offs. For example, some Oak spe- cies (Quercus spp.) in Eastern
Recommended publications
  • Ficha Informativa De Los Humedales De Ramsar (FIR) Versión 2009-2012
    Ficha Informativa de los Humedales de Ramsar (FIR) versión 2009-2012 1. Nombre y dirección del compilador de la Ficha: PARA USO INTERNO DE LA OFICINA DE RAMSAR . DD MM YY Sandro Menezes Silva Conservação Internacional (CI-Brasil) R. Paraná, 32 CEP-79020-290 Designation date Site Reference Number Campo Grande - MS – Brasil [email protected] Tel: +55(67) 3326-0002 Fax: +55(67) 3326-8737 2. Fecha en que la Ficha se llenó /actualizó : Julio 2008 3. País: Brasil 4. Nombre del sitio Ramsar: Reserva Particular del Patrimonio Natural (RPPN) “Fazenda Rio Negro” 5. Designación de nuevos sitios Ramsar o actualización de los ya existentes: Esta FIR es para (marque una sola casilla) : a) Designar un nuevo sitio Ramsar o b) Actualizar información sobre un sitio Ramsar existente 6. Sólo para las actualizaciones de FIR, cambios en el sitio desde su designación o anterior actualización: 7. Mapa del sitio: a) Se incluye un mapa del sitio, con límites claramente delineados, con el siguiente formato: i) versión impresa (necesaria para inscribir el sitio en la Lista de Ramsar): Anexo 1 ; ii ) formato electrónico (por ejemplo, imagen JPEG o ArcView) iii) un archivo SIG con tablas de atributos y vectores georreferenciados sobre los límites del sitio b) Describa sucintamente el tipo de delineación de límites aplicado: El límite del Sitio Ramsar es el mismo de la RPPN Fazenda Rio Negro, reconocida oficialmente como área protegida por el gobierno de la Provincia de Mato Grosso 8. Coordenadas geográficas (latitud / longitud, en grados y minutos): Lat 19°33'2.78"S / long 56°13'27.93"O (coordenadas de la sede de la hacienda) 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Toco Toucan Feeding Ecology and Local Abundance in a Habitat Mosaic in the Brazilian Cerrado
    ORNITOLOGIA NEOTROPICAL 19: 345–359, 2008 © The Neotropical Ornithological Society TOCO TOUCAN FEEDING ECOLOGY AND LOCAL ABUNDANCE IN A HABITAT MOSAIC IN THE BRAZILIAN CERRADO José Ragusa-Netto Departamento de Ciências Naturais, Campus Três Lagoas, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul, C.P. 210, 79620-080, Três Lagoas, MS, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] Resumo. – Ecologia alimentar e abundância local do Tucano Toco, em um mosaico de habitats do cerrado. – Os tucanos são frugívoros do dossel que exploram áreas amplas e heterogêneas. O Tucano Toco (Ramphastos toco) é comum no Brasil Central, principalmente no cerrado. Nesse estudo avaliei a pro- dução de frutos, a abundância do Tucano Toco e seus hábitos alimentares em um mosaico de habitats do cerrado. Tanto as variações espaciais quanto temporais de abundância dos tucanos coincidiram com o perí- odo de frutificação das espécies consumidas extensivamente. Essas espécies, principalmente Virola sebifera na mata ciliar e Schefflera macrocarpa no cerrado, exibiram períodos prolongados de frutificação, além de serem conhecidas por produzirem diásporos com elevado teor de lipídeos. Por outro lado, com exceção de Eugenia punicifolia e Miconia albicans, os tucanos consumiram moderadamente muitos tipos de frutos ricos em açúcares, que estiveram disponíveis por breves períodos. Portanto, em razão do Tucano Toco explorar, durante a maior parte do tempo, proporções elevadas de poucas espécies de frutos e oportunamente alter- nar para uma dieta mais variada, ele exibiu variações acentuadas de amplitude de nicho alimentar. As pro- fundas variações espaciais e temporais de abundância, ao longo do ano, sugerem que os tucanos exploram áreas amplas e heterogênas em resposta à disponibilidade de frutos que são importantes em sua dieta.
    [Show full text]
  • Limited Alpine Climatic Warming and Modeled Phenology Advancement for Three Alpine Species in the Northeast United States
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Ecology Center Publications Ecology Center 9-14-2014 Limited Alpine Climatic Warming and Modeled Phenology Advancement for Three Alpine Species in the Northeast United States Michael L. Davis Utah State University Kenneth D. Kimball Appalachian Mountain Club Douglas M. Weihrauch Appalachian Mountain Club Georgia L. D. Murray Appalachian Mountain Club Kenneth Rancourt Mount Washington Observatory Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/eco_pubs Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Davis, Michael L.; Kimball, Kenneth D.; Weihrauch, Douglas M.; Murray, Georgia L. D.; and Rancourt, Kenneth, "Limited Alpine Climatic Warming and Modeled Phenology Advancement for Three Alpine Species in the Northeast United States" (2014). Ecology Center Publications. Paper 31. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/eco_pubs/31 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Ecology Center at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ecology Center Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. American Journal of Botany 101 ( 9 ): 1437 – 1446 , 2014 . L IMITED ALPINE CLIMATIC WARMING AND MODELED PHENOLOGY ADVANCEMENT FOR THREE ALPINE SPECIES IN THE NORTHEAST UNITED STATES 1 K ENNETH D. KIMBALL 2,5 , M ICHAEL L. DAVIS 2,3 , D OUGLAS M . W EIHRAUCH 2 , G EORGIA L. D. MURRAY 2 , AND K ENNETH R ANCOURT 4 2 Research Department, Appalachian Mountain Club, 361 Route 16, Gorham, New Hampshire 03581 USA; 3 Ecology Center, Utah State University, 5205 Old Main Hill—NR 314, Logan, Utah 84322 USA; and 4 Mount Washington Observatory, 2779 White Mountain Highway, North Conway, New Hampshire 03860 USA • Premise of the study: Most alpine plants in the Northeast United States are perennial and fl ower early in the growing season, extending their limited growing season.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phenology Handbook a Guide to Phenological Monitoring for Students, Teachers, Families, and Nature Enthusiasts
    The Phenology Handbook A guide to phenological monitoring for students, teachers, families, and nature enthusiasts Brian P Haggerty and Susan J Mazer University of California, Santa Barbara © 2008 Brian P Haggerty and Susan J Mazer Acknowledgments Since the Spring of 2007 it has been our great pleasure to work with a wide variety of students, educators, scien- tists, and nature enthusiasts while developing the Phenology Stewardship Program at the University of California, Santa Barbara. We would like to express our gratitude to those who have contributed (and who are currently con- tributing) time and energy for field observations, classroom implementation, and community outreach. We thank the Phenology Stewards (UCSB undergraduates) who have helped to collect plant and avian phenological data at UCSB’s Coal Oil Point Natural Reserve and to develop the methodologies and protocols that are presented in this handbook. Special thanks to the Phenology Stewardship graphic design team who helped develop this handbook, including Christopher Cosner, Karoleen Decastro, Vanessa Zucker, and Megan van den Bergh (illustrator). We also thank Scott Bull, the UCSB Coastal Fund, and the students of UCSB for providing funding for the devel- opment and continued operation of the Phenology Stewardship Program at UCSB. We would like to thank those in the Santa Barbara region who are implementing phenology education and engag- ing students to participate in Project Budburst, including: • Dr. Jennifer Thorsch and UCSB’s Cheadle Center for Biodiversity and Ecological Restoration (CCBER), as well as the teachers associated with CCBER’s “Kids In Nature” environmental education program; • the “teachers in training” in the Teacher Education Program at UCSB’s Gevirtz School of Graduate Educa- tion who work in K-12 schools throughout Santa Barbara; and • docents at natural reserves and botanic gardens, including Coal Oil Point, Sedgwick, Arroyo Hondo, Ran- cho Santa Ana, Carpenteria Salt Marsh, Santa Barbara Botanic Garden, Lotusland Botanic Garden.
    [Show full text]
  • The Plant Phenology Monitoring Design for the National Ecological Observatory Network Sarah Elmendorf
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group Publications 4-2016 The plant phenology monitoring design for The National Ecological Observatory Network Sarah Elmendorf Katherine D. Jones Benjamin I. Cook Jeffrey M. Diez Carolyn A. F. Enquist See next page for additional authors Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/ntsg_pubs Recommended Citation Elmendorf, S. C., K. D. Jones, B. I. Cook, J. M. Diez, C. A. F. Enquist, R. A. Hufft, M. O. Jones, S. J. Mazer, A. J. Miller-Rushing, D. J. P. Moore, M. D. Schwartz, and J. F. Weltzin. 2016. The lp ant phenology monitoring design for The aN tional Ecological Observatory Network. Ecosphere 7(4):e01303. 10.1002/ecs2.1303 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group Publications by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Sarah Elmendorf, Katherine D. Jones, Benjamin I. Cook, Jeffrey M. Diez, Carolyn A. F. Enquist, Rebecca A. Hufft, Matthew O. Jones, Susan J. Mazer, Abraham J. Miller-Rushing, David J. P. Moore, Mark D. Schwartz, and Jake F. Weltzin This article is available at ScholarWorks at University of Montana: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/ntsg_pubs/405 SPECIAL FEATURE: NEON DESIGN The plant phenology monitoring design for The National Ecological Observatory Network Sarah C.
    [Show full text]
  • A Remotely Sensed Pigment Index Reveals Photosynthetic Phenology in Evergreen Conifers
    A remotely sensed pigment index reveals photosynthetic phenology in evergreen conifers John A. Gamona,b,c,1, K. Fred Huemmrichd, Christopher Y. S. Wonge,f, Ingo Ensmingere,f,g, Steven Garrityh, David Y. Hollingeri, Asko Noormetsj, and Josep Peñuelask,l aCenter for Advanced Land Management Information Technologies, School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583; bDepartment of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2E3; cDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2E9; dNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Greenbelt, MD 20771; eDepartment of Biology, University of Toronto, Mississauga, ON, Canada L5L1C6; fGraduate Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 1A1; gGraduate Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3G5; hDecagon Devices, Inc., Pullman, WA 99163; iUS Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Durham, NH 03824; jDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695; kConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC), Global Ecology Unit, Center for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications (CREAF)-CSIC-Campus de Bellaterra, Bellaterra 08193, Catalonia, Spain; and lCREAF, Cerdanyola del Vallès 08193, Catalonia, Spain Edited by Christopher B. Field, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Stanford, CA, and approved September 29, 2016 (received for review April 17, 2016) In evergreen conifers, where the foliage amount changes little with photosynthetic activity has been temperature-limited (3, 7). By season, accurate detection of the underlying “photosynthetic phe- contrast, warmer growing seasons are also more likely to cause nology” from satellite remote sensing has been difficult, presenting drought, restricting ecosystem carbon uptake and enhancing eco- challenges for global models of ecosystem carbon uptake.
    [Show full text]
  • Contrasting Responses of Autumn-Leaf Senescence to Daytime and Night-Time Warming
    LETTERS https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0346-z Contrasting responses of autumn-leaf senescence to daytime and night-time warming Chaoyang Wu 1,2*, Xiaoyue Wang1,2, Huanjiong Wang 1,2*, Philippe Ciais 3, Josep Peñuelas 4,5, Ranga B. Myneni6, Ankur R. Desai 7, Christopher M. Gough8, Alemu Gonsamo 9, Andrew T. Black1, Rachhpal S. Jassal10, Weimin Ju11, Wenping Yuan12, Yongshuo Fu13, Miaogen Shen14, Shihua Li15, Ronggao Liu16, Jing M. Chen9 and Quansheng Ge 1,2* Plant phenology is a sensitive indicator of climate change1–4 be as important as spring in regulating the interannual variability and plays an important role in regulating carbon uptake by of carbon balance7. plants5–7. Previous studies have focused on spring leaf-out by LSD has been occurring later in most regions over the past few daytime temperature and the onset of snow-melt time8,9, but decades18, but providing an explanation for this change is difficult9. the drivers controlling leaf senescence date (LSD) in autumn An increase in global temperature is assumed to be a driver of LSD remain largely unknown10–12. Using long-term ground pheno- trends19, but studies have indicated that the contribution of tem- logical records (14,536 time series since the 1900s) and satel- perature to LSD variability is low, especially compared with spring lite greenness observations dating back to the 1980s, we show phenology20,21. We argue that ignoring the asymmetric effects22 of that rising pre-season maximum daytime (Tday) and minimum Tday versus Tnight and their differing impacts on LSD contributes to night-time (Tnight) temperatures had contrasting effects on the the reported overall low contribution of temperature to LSD vari- timing of autumn LSD in the Northern Hemisphere (> 20° N).
    [Show full text]
  • Global Biogeographical Pattern of Ecosystem Functional Types Derived from Earth Observation Data
    Remote Sens. 2013, 5, 3305-3330; doi:10.3390/rs5073305 OPEN ACCESS Remote Sensing ISSN 2072-4292 www.mdpi.com/journal/remotesensing Article Global Biogeographical Pattern of Ecosystem Functional Types Derived From Earth Observation Data Eva Ivits 1,*, Michael Cherlet 1, Stephanie Horion 2 and Rasmus Fensholt 2 1 Land Resource Management Unit, European Commission Joint Research Centre, I-21027 Ispra, Italy; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Oster Voldgade 10, DK-1350 Copenhagen, Denmark; E-Mails: [email protected] (S.H.); [email protected] (R.F.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-332-78-5315. Received: 22 May 2013; in revised form: 27 June 2013 / Accepted: 1 July 2013 / Published: 10 July 2013 Abstract: The present study classified global Ecosystem Functional Types (EFTs) derived from seasonal vegetation dynamics of the GIMMS3g NDVI time-series. Rotated Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was run on the derived phenological and productivity variables, which selected the Standing Biomass (approximation of Net Primary Productivity), the Cyclic Fraction (seasonal vegetation productivity), the Permanent Fraction (permanent surface vegetation), the Maximum Day (day of maximum vegetation development) and the Season Length (length of vegetation growing season) variables, describing 98% of the variation in global ecosystems. EFTs were created based on Isodata classification of the spatial patterns of the Principal Components and were interpreted via gradient analysis using the selected remote sensing variables and climatic constraints (radiation, temperature, and water) of vegetation growth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phenology of Plant Invasions: a Community Ecology Perspective
    Frontiers inEcology and the Environment The phenology of plant invasions: a community ecology perspective Elizabeth M Wolkovich and Elsa E Cleland Front Ecol Environ 2010; doi:10.1890/100033 This article is citable (as shown above) and is released from embargo once it is posted to the Frontiers e-View site (www.frontiersinecology.org). Please note: This article was downloaded from Frontiers e-View, a service that publishes fully edited and formatted manuscripts before they appear in print in Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. Readers are strongly advised to check the final print version in case any changes have been made. esaesa © The Ecological Society of America www.frontiersinecology.org REVIEWS REVIEWS REVIEWS The phenology of plant invasions: a community ecology perspective Elizabeth M Wolkovich1* and Elsa E Cleland2 Community ecologists have long recognized the importance of phenology (the timing of periodic life-history events) in structuring communities. Phenological differences between exotic and native species may con- tribute to the success of invaders, yet ecology has not developed a general theory for how phenology may shape invasions. Shifts toward longer growing seasons, tracked by plant and animal species worldwide, heighten the need for this analysis. The concurrent availability of extensive citizen-science and long-term datasets has created tremendous opportunities to test the relationship between phenology and invasion. Here, we (1) extend major theories within community and invasion biology to include phenology, (2) develop a pre- dictive framework to test these theories, and (3) outline available data resources to test predictions. By creating an integrated framework, we show how new analyses of long-term datasets could advance the fields of com- munity ecology and invasion biology, while developing novel strategies for invasive species management.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Control of Terrestrial Gross Primary Productivity by Plant Phenology and Physiology
    Joint control of terrestrial gross primary productivity by plant phenology and physiology Jianyang Xiaa,1,2, Shuli Niub,1,2, Philippe Ciaisc, Ivan A. Janssensd, Jiquan Chene, Christof Ammannf, Altaf Araing, Peter D. Blankenh, Alessandro Cescattii, Damien Bonalj, Nina Buchmannk, Peter S. Curtisl, Shiping Chenm, Jinwei Donga, Lawrence B. Flanagann, Christian Frankenbergo, Teodoro Georgiadisp, Christopher M. Goughq, Dafeng Huir, Gerard Kielys, Jianwei Lia,t, Magnus Lundu, Vincenzo Magliulov, Barbara Marcollaw, Lutz Merboldk, Leonardo Montagnanix,y, Eddy J. Moorsz, Jørgen E. Olesenaa, Shilong Piaobb,cc, Antonio Raschidd, Olivier Roupsardee,ff, Andrew E. Suykergg, Marek Urbaniakhh, Francesco P. Vaccaridd, Andrej Varlaginii, Timo Vesalajj,kk, Matthew Wilkinsonll, Ensheng Wengmm, Georg Wohlfahrtnn,oo, Liming Yanpp, and Yiqi Luoa,qq,1,2 aDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019; bSynthesis Research Center of Chinese Ecosystem Research Network, Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Beijing 100101, China; cLaboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, 91191 Gif sur Yvette, France; dDepartment of Biology, University of Antwerpen, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium; eCenter for Global Change and Earth Observations and Department of Geography, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824; fClimate and Air Pollution Group, Federal Research Station Agroscope, CH-8046 Zurich, Switzerland; gSchool of Geography and
    [Show full text]
  • Methods for Broad-Scale Plant Phenology Assessments Using Citizen Scientists’ Photographs
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/754275; this version posted September 1, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. Methods for broad-scale plant phenology assessments using citizen scientists’ photographs Vijay V. Barve1,*, Laura Brenskelle1, Daijiang Li1, Brian J. Stucky1, Narayani V. Barve1, Maggie M. Hantak1, Bryan S. McLean1, 2, Daniel J. Paluh1, Jessica A. Oswald1, 3, Michael Belitz1, Ryan Folk1, 4, Robert Guralnick1 1. Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 2. Department of Biology, University of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC 27402 3. Biology Department, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557 4. Department of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762 Abstract Broad-scale plant flowering phenology data has predominantly come from geographically and taxonomically restricted monitoring networks. However, platforms such as iNaturalist, where citizen scientists upload photographs and curate identifications, provide a promising new source of data. Here we develop a general set of best practices for scoring iNaturalist digital records supporting downstream re-use in phenology studies. We focus on a case study group, Yucca, because it has showy flowers and is well documented on iNaturalist. Additionally, drivers of Yucca phenology are not well-understood despite need for Yucca to synchronize flowering with obligate moth pollinators. Finally, evidence of anomalous flowering events have been recently reported, but the extent of those events is unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • Flowering Phenology Shifts in Response to Biodiversity Loss
    Flowering phenology shifts in response to biodiversity loss Amelia A. Wolfa,b,c,1, Erika S. Zavaletad, and Paul C. Selmantse aEcology, Evolution, and Environmental Sciences Department, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027; bInstitute of the Environment and Sustainability, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095; cDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616; dDepartment of Environmental Studies, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064; and eWestern Geographic Science Center, US Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA 94025 Edited by Christopher B. Field, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Stanford, CA, and approved February 1, 2017 (received for review May 24, 2016) Observational studies and experimental evidence agree that rising Altering plant community structure could influence phenology global temperatures have altered plant phenology—the timing of indirectly, via effects on abiotic processes and resource avail- life events, such as flowering, germination, and leaf-out. Other ability, or directly, via biotic interactions. Years of experimental large-scale global environmental changes, such as nitrogen deposi- manipulations of plant species diversity have demonstrated that tion and altered precipitation regimes, have also been linked to diversity affects abiotic ecosystem processes, such as soil mois- changes in flowering times. Despite our increased understanding ture and nutrient pools (13, 14). These effects mimic, on a of how abiotic factors influence plant phenology, we know very smaller spatial scale, many of the main effects of anthropogenic little about how biotic interactions can affect flowering times, a nitrogen deposition and changing precipitation patterns, but significant knowledge gap given ongoing human-caused alteration it remains untested whether the magnitude of these diversity of biodiversity and plant community structure at the global scale.
    [Show full text]