Hemitheconyx Caudicinctus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Hemitheconyx caudicinctus Hemitheconyx caudicinctus, commonly known as the African fat-tailed gecko, is a nocturnal, ground-dwelling gecko. The African fat-tailed gecko is from the subfamily Eublepharinae. Members of this subfamily include the leopard gecko of south Central Asia, India, and Pakistan. This subfamily has clearly different characteristics from other geckos. They are terrestrial and nocturnal, and have moveable eyelids, vertical pupils, and no adhesive lamellae (sticky feet). Scientific Classification The African fat-tailed gecko is found in West Africa, from Senegal to Cameroon. Their habitat is dry and arid, Kingdom: Anamalia although they will spend most of their time in a dark, humid Phylum: Cordata hiding place. In captivity, it is important to provide these geckos Class: Reptilia with a source of humidity that mimics these conditions. Order: Squamata The African fat-tailed gecko is typically around 7-9 inches (18– Family: Eublepharidae 23 cm), with females being slightly smaller than males. They Geunus Hemitheconyx have a captive lifespan of 10–25 years. Normal coloring is brown Species H. caudicinctus and tan/beige stripes, with a possible thin white stripe along the length of the back. The underbelly is pale pink or off-white. Binomial Name The African fat-tailed gecko is equipped with the ability to lose its tail when threatened or attacked. If the tail is lost, the new tail will Hemitheconyx caudicinctus have a more rounded shape, similar to the head. It may not match the body coloration and pattern of the gecko. The tail is (Duméril, 1851)[1] also where they store their fat, an important energy reserve. With its tail, an African fat tailed gecko can go days on end without food.[citation needed] African fat-tailed geckos as pets[edit] In the pet trade the African fat-tailed gecko has gained some popularity though is still not as popular as the closely related leopard gecko. Unlike the leopard gecko, these geckos tend to be more docile but do have a higher humidity requirement. Through selective breeding the reptile trade has been able to produce numerous color variants of the African fat-tailed gecko including tangerine, albino, patternless, black out, and aberrant fat-tails. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

HERPETOLOGICAL BULLETIN Number 106 – Winter 2008
The HERPETOLOGICAL BULLETIN Number 106 – Winter 2008 PUBLISHED BY THE BRITISH HERPETOLOGICAL SOCIETY THE HERPETOLOGICAL BULLETIN Contents RESEA R CH AR TICLES Use of transponders in the post-release monitoring of translocated spiny-tailed lizards (Uromastyx aegyptia microlepis) in Abu Dhabi Emirate, United Arab Emirates Pritpal S. Soorae, Judith Howlett and Jamie Samour .......................... 1 Gastrointestinal helminths of three species of Dicrodon (Squamata: Teiidae) from Peru Stephen R. Goldberg and Charles R. Bursey ..................................... 4 Notes on the Natural History of the eublepharid Gecko Hemitheconyx caudicinctus in northwestern Ghana Stephen Spawls ........................................................ 7 Significant range extension for the Central American Colubrid snake Ninia pavimentata (Bocourt 1883) Josiah H. Townsend, J. Micheal Butler, Larry David Wilson, Lorraine P. Ketzler, John Slapcinsky and Nathaniel M. Stewart ..................................... 15 Predation on Italian Newt larva, Lissotriton italicus (Amphibia, Caudata, Salamandridae), by Agabus bipustulatus (Insecta, Coleoptera, Dytiscidae) Luigi Corsetti and Gianluca Nardi........................................ 18 Behaviour, Time Management, and Foraging Modes of a West Indian Racer, Alsophis sibonius Lauren A. White, Peter J. Muelleman, Robert W. Henderson and Robert Powell . 20 Communal egg-laying and nest-sites of the Goo-Eater, Sibynomorphus mikanii (Colubridae, Dipsadinae) in southeastern Brazil Henrique B. P. Braz, Francisco L. Franco
[Show full text]
Leopard Geckos & African Fat-Tails Geckos
A Compassionate Commitment to Quality Pet Care! LEOPARD GECKOS & AFRICAN FAT-TAILS GECKOS SPECIES NAMES Leopard geckos (Eublepharis maclarius), African fat-tailed geckos (Hemitheconyx caudicinctus). Both are members of the Eublepharidae family, which includes all species of geckos with moveable eyelids. CAGING/HOUSING For a single gecko, a 10-gallon glass aquarium with a securely fastened wire mesh top is appropriate. For two or more geckos a 20- gallon or larger aquarium is necessary. For substrate use paper towels, newspaper, or artificial turf, washed orchard bark, or aquarium gravel. The use of sand or calcium-fortified sand (such as ReptiSand™ or Calci-Sand™) is not recommended for geckos less than 6 inches in length, due to the risk of ingestion and subsequent impaction in the gastrointestinal tract. A hide-box, or shelter, should be provided to allow the gecko a quiet retreat. LIGHTING/HEATING In order to properly thermo-regulate, leopard geckos need a temperature gradient that allows them to move from a cooler end of the tank to a warmer end. This temperature gradient should range between 70°F at the cool end at 85°F at the high end. African fat-tailed geckos require slightly higher temperatures ranging from between 80°F and 92°F. Since these geckos are nocturnal, UV lighting is not necessary. HUMIDITY A moderate level of humidity is required for these geckos, which can be provided by misting and providing a large water bowl for the animal to soak in. Low humidity levels can lead to problems with shedding. FEEDING Food items, as a general rule, should be no longer than the length, and less than half the width of the geckos head.
[Show full text]
Suggested Guidelines for Reptiles and Amphibians Used in Outreach
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REPTILES AND AMPHIBIANS USED IN OUTREACH PROGRAMS Compiled by Diane Barber, Fort Worth Zoo Originally posted September 2003; updated February 2008 INTRODUCTION This document has been created by the AZA Reptile and Amphibian Taxon Advisory Groups to be used as a resource to aid in the development of institutional outreach programs. Within this document are lists of species that are commonly used in reptile and amphibian outreach programs. With over 12,700 species of reptiles and amphibians in existence today, it is obvious that there are numerous combinations of species that could be safely used in outreach programs. It is not the intent of these Taxon Advisory Groups to produce an all-inclusive or restrictive list of species to be used in outreach. Rather, these lists are intended for use as a resource and are some of the more common species that have been safely used in outreach programs. A few species listed as potential outreach animals have been earmarked as controversial by TAG members for various reasons. In each case, we have made an effort to explain debatable issues, enabling staff members to make informed decisions as to whether or not each animal is appropriate for their situation and the messages they wish to convey. It is hoped that during the species selection process for outreach programs, educators, collection managers, and other zoo staff work together, using TAG Outreach Guidelines, TAG Regional Collection Plans, and Institutional Collection Plans as tools. It is well understood that space in zoos is limited and it is important that outreach animals are included in institutional collection plans and incorporated into conservation programs when feasible.
[Show full text]
Body-Size Effect on Egg Size in Eublepharid Geckos (Squamata
Blackwell Publishing LtdOxford, UKBIJBiological Journal of the Linnean Society0024-4066The Linnean Society of London, 20062006 884 527532 Original Article EGG-SIZE ALLOMETRY IN EUBLEPHARID GECKOS L. KRATOCHVÍL and D. FRYNTA Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2006, 88, 527–532. With 2 figures Body-size effect on egg size in eublepharid geckos (Squamata: Eublepharidae), lizards with invariant clutch size: negative allometry for egg size in ectotherms is not universal LUKÁT KRATOCHVÍL1* and DANIEL FRYNTA2 1Department of Ecology, Charles University, Vinidná 7, CZ-128 44 Praha 2, the Czech Republic 2Department of Zoology, Charles University, Vinidná 7, CZ-128 44 Praha 2, the Czech Republic Received 1 February 2005; accepted for publication 5 December 2005 Within a single clutch, smaller species of ectotherms generally lay a smaller number of relatively larger eggs than do larger species. Many hypotheses explaining both the interspeciﬁc negative allometry in egg size and egg size– number trade-off postulate the existence of an upper limit to the egg size of larger species. Speciﬁcally, in lizards, large eggs of large species could have too long a duration of incubation, or they could be too large to pass through the pelvic opening, which is presumably constrained mechanically in larger species. Alternatively, negative allometry could be a result of limits affecting eggs of smaller species. Under the latter concept, hatchling size in smaller species may be close to the lower limit imposed by ecological interactions or physiological processes, and therefore smaller species have to invest in relatively larger offspring. Contrary to these lower limit hypotheses, explanations based on the existence of an upper limit always predict negative egg-size allometry even in animals with invariant clutch size, in which naturally there is no egg size–number trade-off.
[Show full text]
Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History Database
Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History database Abdala, C. S., A. S. Quinteros, and R. E. Espinoza. 2008. Two new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from the puna of northwestern Argentina. Herpetologica 64:458-471. Abdala, C. S., D. Baldo, R. A. Juárez, and R. E. Espinoza. 2016. The first parthenogenetic pleurodont Iguanian: a new all-female Liolaemus (Squamata: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. Copeia 104:487-497. Abdala, C. S., J. C. Acosta, M. R. Cabrera, H. J. Villaviciencio, and J. Marinero. 2009. A new Andean Liolaemus of the L. montanus series (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. South American Journal of Herpetology 4:91-102. Abdala, C. S., J. L. Acosta, J. C. Acosta, B. B. Alvarez, F. Arias, L. J. Avila, . S. M. Zalba. 2012. Categorización del estado de conservación de las lagartijas y anfisbenas de la República Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 26 (Suppl. 1):215-248. Abell, A. J. 1999. Male-female spacing patterns in the lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Amphibia-Reptilia 20:185-194. Abts, M. L. 1987. Environment and variation in life history traits of the Chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus. Ecological Monographs 57:215-232. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2003. Anfibios y reptiles del Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay: Facultad de Ciencias. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2007. Anfibio y reptiles del Uruguay, 3rd edn. Montevideo, Uruguay: Serie Fauna 1. Ackermann, T. 2006. Schreibers Glatkopfleguan Leiocephalus schreibersii. Munich, Germany: Natur und Tier. Ackley, J. W., P. J. Muelleman, R. E. Carter, R. W. Henderson, and R. Powell. 2009. A rapid assessment of herpetofaunal diversity in variously altered habitats on Dominica.
[Show full text]
Characterization of Five Complete Cyrtodactylus Mitogenome Structures Reveals Low Structural Diversity and Conservation of Repeated Sequences in the Lineage
Characterization of five complete Cyrtodactylus mitogenome structures reveals low structural diversity and conservation of repeated sequences in the lineage Prapatsorn Areesirisuk1,2,3, Narongrit Muangmai3,4, Kirati Kunya5, Worapong Singchat1,3, Siwapech Sillapaprayoon1,3, Sorravis Lapbenjakul1,3, Watcharaporn Thapana1,3,6, Attachai Kantachumpoo1,3,6, Sudarath Baicharoen7, Budsaba Rerkamnuaychoke2, Surin Peyachoknagul1,8, Kyudong Han9 and Kornsorn Srikulnath1,3,6,10 1 Laboratory of Animal Cytogenetics and Comparative Genomics (ACCG), Department of Genetics, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand 2 Human Genetic Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand 3 Animal Breeding and Genetics Consortium of Kasetsart University (ABG-KU), Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand 4 Department of Fishery Biology, Faculty of Fisheries, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand 5 Nakhon Ratchasima Zoo, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand 6 Center for Advanced Studies in Tropical Natural Resources, National Research University-Kasetsart University (CASTNAR, NRU-KU, Thailand), Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand 7 Bureau of Conservation and Research, Zoological Park Organization under the Royal Patronage of His Majesty the King, Bangkok, Thailand 8 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand 9 Department of Nanobiomedical Science & BK21 PLUS NBM Global Research Center for Regenerative Medicine, Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea 10 Center of Excellence on Agricultural Biotechnology: (AG-BIO/PERDO-CHE), Bangkok, Thailand ABSTRACT Submitted 30 July 2018 Accepted 15 November 2018 Mitochondrial genomes (mitogenomes) of five Cyrtodactylus were determined. Their Published 13 December 2018 compositions and structures were similar to most of the available gecko lizard Corresponding author mitogenomes as 13 protein-coding, two rRNA and 22 tRNA genes.
[Show full text]
Independent Evolution of Sex Chromosomes in Eublepharid Geckos, a Lineage with Environmental and Genotypic Sex Determination
life Article Independent Evolution of Sex Chromosomes in Eublepharid Geckos, A Lineage with Environmental and Genotypic Sex Determination Eleonora Pensabene , Lukáš Kratochvíl and Michail Rovatsos * Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, 12844 Prague, Czech Republic; [email protected] (E.P.); [email protected] (L.K.) * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] Received: 19 November 2020; Accepted: 7 December 2020; Published: 10 December 2020 Abstract: Geckos demonstrate a remarkable variability in sex determination systems, but our limited knowledge prohibits accurate conclusions on the evolution of sex determination in this group. Eyelid geckos (Eublepharidae) are of particular interest, as they encompass species with both environmental and genotypic sex determination. We identified for the first time the X-specific gene content in the Yucatán banded gecko, Coleonyx elegans, possessing X1X1X2X2/X1X2Y multiple sex chromosomes by comparative genome coverage analysis between sexes. The X-specific gene content of Coleonyx elegans was revealed to be partially homologous to genomic regions linked to the chicken autosomes 1, 6 and 11. A qPCR-based test was applied to validate a subset of X-specific genes by comparing the difference in gene copy numbers between sexes, and to explore the homology of sex chromosomes across eleven eublepharid, two phyllodactylid and one sphaerodactylid species. Homologous sex chromosomes are shared between Coleonyx elegans and Coleonyx mitratus, two species diverged approximately 34 million years ago, but not with other tested species. As far as we know, the X-specific gene content of Coleonyx elegans / Coleonyx mitratus was never involved in the sex chromosomes of other gecko lineages, indicating that the sex chromosomes in this clade of eublepharid geckos evolved independently.
[Show full text]
Captive Wildlife Exclusion List
Manual: Title: Appendix: Page: OPERATIONS CAPTIVE WILDLIFE II - 6 - 2 1. CAPTIVE WILDLIFE PERMIT AND IMPORT PERMIT EXCLUSION LIST Pursuant to Section 113(at) of the Wildlife Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c504 and Section 6 of the General Wildlife Regulations, the Director of Wildlife has determined that: The following list of wildlife species may be: a. Imported into the province without an Import Permit issued under the Wildlife Act; or b. Kept in captivity without a Captive Wildlife Permit. Subject to the following conditions: 1. The species has originated from a reputable captive breeding program, or can legally and sustainably be taken from the wild in the originating jurisdiction. 2. The species are disease free. 3. The species will not be released to the wild without a Wildlife Release Permit. 4. The species will be properly housed, and if transported off the premises of the owner, shall be in an escape-proof container, except where permission is received from the property owner. Mammals ** Family: Petauridae Gliders Petuarus breviceps Sugar Glider Family: Erinaceidae Hedgehogs Atelerix albiventis African Pygmy Hedgehog Family: Mustelidae Weasels and Allies Mustela putorius furo Ferret (Domestic) Family: Muridae Old World Rats and Mice Rattus norvegicus Norway Rat (Common Brown) Rattus rattus Black Rat (Roof White Laboratory strain only) Family: Cricetidae New World Rats and Mice Meriones unquiculatus Gerbil (Mongolian) Mesocricetus auratus Hamster (Golden) Issued: October 11, 2007 Manual: Title: Appendix: Page: OPERATIONS CAPTIVE WILDLIFE II - 6 - 2 2. Family: Caviidae Guinea Pigs and Allies Cavia porcellus Guinea Pig Family: Chinchillidae Chinchillas Chincilla laniger Chinchilla Family: Leporidae Hares and Rabbits Oryctolagus cuniculus European Rabbit (domestic strain only) Birds Family: Psittacidae Parrots Psittaciformes spp.* All parrots, parakeets, lories, lorikeets, cockatoos and macaws.
[Show full text]
1 §4-71-6.5 List of Restricted Animals [ ] Part A: For
§4-71-6.5 LIST OF RESTRICTED ANIMALS [ ] PART A: FOR RESEARCH AND EXHIBITION SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Hirudinea ORDER Gnathobdellida FAMILY Hirudinidae Hirudo medicinalis leech, medicinal ORDER Rhynchobdellae FAMILY Glossiphoniidae Helobdella triserialis leech, small snail CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Haplotaxida FAMILY Euchytraeidae Enchytraeidae (all species in worm, white family) FAMILY Eudrilidae Helodrilus foetidus earthworm FAMILY Lumbricidae Lumbricus terrestris earthworm Allophora (all species in genus) earthworm CLASS Polychaeta ORDER Phyllodocida FAMILY Nereidae Nereis japonica lugworm PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Arachnida ORDER Acari FAMILY Phytoseiidae 1 RESTRICTED ANIMAL LIST (Part A) §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Iphiseius degenerans predator, spider mite Mesoseiulus longipes predator, spider mite Mesoseiulus macropilis predator, spider mite Neoseiulus californicus predator, spider mite Neoseiulus longispinosus predator, spider mite Typhlodromus occidentalis mite, western predatory FAMILY Tetranychidae Tetranychus lintearius biocontrol agent, gorse CLASS Crustacea ORDER Amphipoda FAMILY Hyalidae Parhyale hawaiensis amphipod, marine ORDER Anomura FAMILY Porcellanidae Petrolisthes cabrolloi crab, porcelain Petrolisthes cinctipes crab, porcelain Petrolisthes elongatus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes eriomerus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes gracilis crab, porcelain Petrolisthes granulosus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes japonicus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes laevigatus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes
[Show full text]
Title Phylogenetic Relationships of Eublepharid Geckos
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Kyoto University Research Information Repository Phylogenetic relationships of eublepharid geckos (Reptilia : Title Squamata): A molecular approach Ota, Hidetoshi; Honda, Masanao; Kobayashi, Mari; Sengoku, Author(s) Showichi; Hikida, Tsutomu Citation Zoological Science (1999), 16(4): 659-666 Issue Date 1999-08 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/57225 Right (c) 日本動物学会 / Zoological Society of Japan Type Journal Article Textversion publisher Kyoto University ZOOLOGICAL SCIENCE 16: 659–666 (1999) © 1999 Zoological Society of Japan Phylogenetic Relationships of Eublepharid Geckos (Reptilia: Squamata): A Molecular Approach Hidetoshi Ota1*, Masanao Honda2, Mari Kobayashi2, Showichi Sengoku3, and Tsutomu Hikida2 1Tropical Biosphere Research Center, University of the Ryukyus, Nishihara, Okinawa 903-0213, Japan, 2Department of Zoology, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan and 3Japan Wildlife Research Center, Yushima 2-29-3, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0034, Japan ABSTRACT—Phylogenetic analyses were carried out for representatives of all eublepharid genera and a few other gekkonoid taxa using sequence data for 879 base pairs of mitochondrial 12S and 16S ribosomal RNA genes. Neighbor-joining (NJ) distance analysis of the data suggested independent great divergences of Coleonyx and Aeluroscalabotes, and monophyly of the remainder within Eublepharidae (bootstrap propor- tion [BP]=76%). Of the latter, the two African genera, Hemitheconyx and Holodactylus, were almost certainly monophyletic altogether (BP=99%), whereas their sister-group relationship with Eublepharis received a weaker, but still substantial support (BP=68%). Within Goniurosaurus kuroiwae, G. k. splendens first diverged from the remainder (BP=100%), followed by G.
[Show full text]
Potential Invasion Risk of Pet Traded Lizards, Snakes, Crocodiles
diversity Article Potential Invasion Risk of Pet Traded Lizards, Snakes, Crocodiles, and Tuatara in the EU on the Basis of a Risk Assessment Model (RAM) and Aquatic Species Invasiveness Screening Kit (AS-ISK) OldˇrichKopecký *, Anna Bílková, Veronika Hamatová, Dominika K ˇnazovická, Lucie Konrádová, Barbora Kunzová, Jana Slamˇeníková, OndˇrejSlanina, Tereza Šmídová and Tereza Zemancová Department of Zoology and Fisheries, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, Praha 6 - Suchdol 165 21, Prague, Czech Republic; [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (V.H.); [email protected] (D.K.); [email protected] (L.K.); [email protected] (J.S.); [email protected] (B.K.); [email protected] (O.S.); [email protected] (T.S.); [email protected] (T.Z.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +420-22438-2955 Received: 30 June 2019; Accepted: 9 September 2019; Published: 13 September 2019 Abstract: Because biological invasions can cause many negative impacts, accurate predictions are necessary for implementing effective restrictions aimed at specific high-risk taxa. The pet trade in recent years became the most important pathway for the introduction of non-indigenous species of reptiles worldwide. Therefore, we decided to determine the most common species of lizards, snakes, and crocodiles traded as pets on the basis of market surveys in the Czech Republic, which is an export hub for ornamental animals in the European Union (EU). Subsequently, the establishment and invasion potential for the entire EU was determined for 308 species using proven risk assessment models (RAM, AS-ISK). Species with high establishment potential (determined by RAM) and at the same time with high potential to significantly harm native ecosystems (determined by AS-ISK) included the snakes Thamnophis sirtalis (Colubridae), Morelia spilota (Pythonidae) and also the lizards Tiliqua scincoides (Scincidae) and Intellagama lesueurii (Agamidae).
[Show full text]
Alien Vertebrate Risk Assessment and Invasion Pathway Modelling
Alien vertebrate risk assessment and invasion pathway modelling Pablo García Díaz A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2017 School of Biological Sciences The University of Adelaide, South Australia 1 2 Table of Contents Abstract 5 Thesis declaration 7 Acknowledgements 9 Chapter 1. General introduction 13 Chapter 2. Patterns of transport and introduction 23 of alien amphibians in Australia Chapter 3. Understanding the biological invasion risk 45 posed by the global wildlife trade: propagule pressure drives the introduction and establishment of Nearctic turtles. Chapter 4. The illegal wildlife trade 67 is a likely source of alien species. Chapter 5. Transport pathways shape 83 the biogeography of alien freshwater fishes. Chapter 6. A framework for designing an d implementing 99 early detection surveys for alien reptiles Chapter 7. General discussion 119 3 Appendix 1. Supplementary material to Chapter 2. 129 Appendix 2. Supplementary material to Chapter 3. 133 Appendix 3. Supplementary material to Chapter 4. 139 Appendix 4. Supplementary Material to Chapter 5. 147 References 151 Supplementary Material 179 4 Abstract Alien species are a key driver of the ongoing biodiversity crisis. Changing patterns in the number and identity of transported alien species, and recent changes in the importance of different pathways for transporting alien species (e.g., recent decline in the role of acclimatisation societies vs. the increase in importance of the pet trade) , means that there is a novel pool of alien species available for introduction . There is a pressing need to evaluate the biosecurity risks posed by these emergent alien species and their pathways.
[Show full text]