Effective Use of Courtroom Technology: a Judge’S Guide to Pretrial and Trial

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Effective Use of Courtroom Technology: a Judge’S Guide to Pretrial and Trial Effective Use of Courtroom Technology: A Judge’s Guide to Pretrial and Trial This Federal Judicial Center publication was undertaken in further- ance of the Center’s statutory mission to develop and conduct edu- cation programs for judges and judicial branch employees. The views expressed are those of the authors. On matters of policy, the Center speaks only through its Board. Contents Acknowledgments, ix Address for comments, xii Preface, xiii Part I. Courtroom technology: an overview, 1 Three levels of technology, 2 Level One technologies, 6 Evidence camera, 6 Laptop computer with retrieval and presentation software, 8 Monitors outside the jury box, 10 Digital projector and projection screen, 11 Annotation equipment, 13 Color video printer, 15 Audio system, 15 Telephone interpreting system, 16 System controls, 17 Legacy equipment, 18 Level Two technologies, 20 Small monitors built into the jury box, 21 Electronic whiteboard, 22 Integrated lectern, 24 Videoconference equipment, 24 Real-time reporting, 29 Digital audio reporting, 32 Internet connections, 34 Level Three technologies, 35 IPIX displays, 35 Virtual reality displays, 36 Holograms, 36 Large-scale video, 37 iii Effective Use of Courtroom Technology: A Judge’s Guide to Pretrial & Trial Common problems, 38 Discovery issues, 39 Pretrial issues, 40 Trial issues, 41 Summary of experience to date, 43 Court-provided equipment vs. lawyer-provided equipment, 44 Mandatory use vs. optional use, 44 Court control vs. lawyer control of equipment, 45 Criminal vs. civil proceedings, 46 Appearance of the courtroom, 47 Cost considerations, 49 A level playing field, 50 Juror perceptions, 51 Efficiency for the court, 53 Faster pace for the lawyers, 54 Effects of technology failures, 55 Guidance from the rules, 56 Part II: Discovery, 61 General problems in discovery involving technology, 62 Discovery of documents, 64 Requiring parties to exchange documents in digital format, 64 Cost issues, 70 Format issues, 73 Compression issues, 75 Resolution issues, 76 Sharing expenses, 77 Alteration of documents as they become digital files, 80 Discovery of photographs, 82 Requiring parties to exchange photographs in digital format, 83 iv Effective Use of Courtroom Technology: A Judge’s Guide to Pretrial & Trial Cost issues, 84 Format issues, 84 Compression issues, 86 Resolution issues, 88 Alteration of photographs as they become digital files, 89 Discovery of video, 90 Requiring parties to exchange video in digital format, 91 Format issues, 91 Compression issues, 91 Synchronization of deposition video to digitized text, 92 Alteration of digital video as it is created, 93 Digital format materials, 93 Cost issues, 95 Alteration of digital format materials during discovery, 96 Internet discovery repositories, 97 Part III: Pretrial, 99 Disclosure by the parties, 100 Disclosure as to equipment, 100 Disclosure as to software, 103 Disclosure as to exhibits, 105 Disclosure of digital alteration of documents, 106 Disclosure of digital alteration of photographs, 107 Disclosure of digital alteration of video, 112 Disclosure as to animations, 113 Equipment issues, 115 Shared use of equipment, 115 Shared use of equipment operators, 117 Practice with the equipment, 118 Making the record, 120 Evidentiary exhibits and illustrative aids, 120 Numbering exhibits, 123 Pre-marking exhibits, 127 v Effective Use of Courtroom Technology: A Judge’s Guide to Pretrial & Trial Videoconferencing for pretrial matters, 129 Other uses of technology by the court during pretrial, 132 Visual displays during pretrial proceedings, 132 Pretrial educational materials, 134 Expert assistance in analyzing complex technology or visual displays, 134 Part IV. Trial, 137 Preliminary matters, 138 Representations about equipment and testing, 138 Identification of operators, 141 Backup in case of equipment failure, 141 Jury selection issues, 142 Visual acuity, 143 Color blindness, 143 Hearing impairment, 144 Tolerance for television, 145 Preliminary jury instructions, 146 Orientation for jurors on the equipment, 146 Jury instructions on the screen, 149 Opening statements, 153 Use of bullet-point slides, 154 Preview of graphics with motion or sound, 156 Preview of static graphics, 157 Real-time reporting, 164 Judge monitor vs. participant monitors, 164 Untranslates, 165 Basic service uses, 166 Enhanced service uses, 166 Transcript uses, 167 Cost sharing, 168 Videoconferencing witness testimony, 168 Use of illustrative aids during trial, 174 Direct examination, 174 vi Effective Use of Courtroom Technology: A Judge’s Guide to Pretrial & Trial Cross-examination, 178 Delivery of copies, 179 Record copies, 180 Objections to evidentiary exhibits, 180 Evidence shown electronically vs. evidence that is electronic in nature, 181 Completeness objection, 182 Unfairness objection, 187 Objections to illustrative aids, 192 Unfairness objection, 192 Leading objection, 199 Argumentative objection, 200 Narrative testimony objection, 201 Assuming facts not in evidence objection, 201 Foundation (unsupported opinion) objection, 202 Lay opinion objection, 204 Objections to digitally altered photographs, 204 Objections to computer animations, 205 Closing argument, 209 Final jury instructions, 211 Jury review of computer-generated materials, 212 Posttrial briefs, 214 Computer-generated illustrations in briefs, 214 Digital format briefs, 215 Appendix A: More details about using the equipment, 217 Appendix B: Federal courts with courtroom technology, 287 Appendix C: Local rules with respect to courtroom technology, 293 Appendix D: Sample pretrial order provisions, 297 Appendix E: Helpful resources, 302 Bibliography, 303 Glossary, 315 Index, 334 How to Use the CD, 356 vii Acknowledgments This book is a joint project of the Federal Judicial Center and the National Institute for Trial Advocacy. The project was commissioned by Hon. Fern Smith (N.D. Cal.), director, Federal Judicial Center. The book was written by the National Institute for Trial Advocacy. Re- search and collection of source materials was done by the Federal Judicial Center. Both organizations reviewed and edited the manu- script and worked on the design of the book and its cover. The Federal Judicial Center assembled an advisory committee for this project. Its members are Hon. Jon O. Newman (Ct. App. 2d Cir.); Hon. Paul J. Barbadoro (D. N.H.); Hon. Frank W. Bullock, Jr. (M.D. N.C.); Hon. Edward C. Prado (W.D. Tex.); Hon. James M. Rosenbaum (D. Minn.); Hon. Roger G. Strand (D. Ariz.); Hon. Donald E. Walter (W.D. La.); Hon. Samuel G. Wilson (W.D. Va.); Hon. Larry E. Kelly (Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tex.); Prof. Stephen P. Saltzburg, George Washington University Law School, Washington, D.C.; J. Ric Gass, Kravit, Gass, Hovel & Leitner, Milwaukee, Wis.; and Gregory P. Jo- seph, Fried Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, New York, N.Y. FJC staff members Dr. Elizabeth Wiggins and Dr. Meghan Dunn coordinated the project, reviewed and edited the manuscript, and integrated the work of the advisory committee. David Marshall and Deborah Von Drak supervised the production of the book. Russell R. Wheeler and Kenneth J. Withers reviewed and commented on the manuscript, and Shannon Wheatman helped compile background information. The National Institute for Trial Advocacy’s work on this project was directed by Deanne C. Siemer. NITA’s editorial board members are Prof. Kenneth S. Broun, chair, University of North Carolina Law School, Chapel Hill, N.C.; Joseph R. Bankoff, King & Spaulding, At- lanta, Ga.; Prof. Jo Ann Harris, Pace University School of Law, White Plains, N.Y.; James J. Brosnahan, Morrison & Foerster, San Francisco, Cal.; Deanne C. Siemer, Wilsie Co. LLC, Washington, D.C. NITA’s ix Effective Use of Courtroom Technology: A Judge’s Guide to Pretrial & Trial editor-in-chief is Prof. Anthony J. Bocchino, Temple University Law School. The NITA program directors, faculty, and others who contributed are Hon. Ann C. Williams (Ct. App. 7th Cir.); Hon. Jim R. Carrigan (D. Colo., ret.); Hon. Richard M. Markus (8th Cir. Ct. App. Ohio, ret.); Hon. Frank D. Rothschild (Haw. State Court, 5th Judicial Dis- trict); Prof. Paul J. Zwier, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tenn.; Prof. Frederick C. Moss, Southern Methodist University Law School, Dallas, Tex.; Donald H. Beskind, Twiggs, Abrams, Strickland & Trehy, Raleigh, N.C.; Mark L. Austrian, Collier Shannon Scott, Washington, D.C.; Robert J. Wayne, Seattle, Wash.; Howard P. Willens, Wilsie Co. LLC, Washington, D.C.; Prof. Peter Hoffman, University of Nebraska Law School, Lincoln, Neb.; and Lee R. Marks, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Tysons Corners, Va. NITA’s editorial supervisor Barbara Van Holsbeke edited the manuscript. Brenda Faith worked on the glos- sary. NITA was assisted in this project by DOAR Communications, Inc., Lynbrook, N.Y., and its CEO Samuel H. Solomon whose insights, experience, and contributions to NITA’s teaching materials, courses, and instructional methods in courtroom technology have been in- valuable. DOAR staff prepared most of the graphics for this book, reviewed and commented on the manuscript, and gave time gener- ously over the past year to make the project a success. NITA was also assisted by the Video Bureau LLC, New York, N.Y., and its CEO David Brenner who provided their white paper, sample protocol, and other information on courtroom videoconferencing; and by Fredric I. Lederer, chancellor professor of law at the Marshall-Wythe School of Law of the College of William and Mary in Williamsburg, Va., who is the director of the Courtroom 21 project and
Recommended publications
  • Verizon Fios Channel Guide
    1/14/2020 Extreme HD Print 344 Ch, 151 HD # A 169 A Wealth of Entertainment 669 A Wealth of Entertainment HD 181 A&E 681 A&E HD 571 ACC Network HD 119 AccuWeather DC MD VA 619 AccuWeather DC MD VA HD 424 Action Max 924 Action Max HD 425 Action Max West 231 AMC 731 AMC HD 125 American Heroes Channel 625 American Heroes Channel HD 130 Animal Planet 630 Animal Planet HD 215 AXS tv 569 AXS tv HD # B 765 BabyFirst HD 189 BBC America 689 BBC America HD 107 BBC World News 609 BBC World News HD 596 beIN Sports HD 270 BET 225 BET Gospel 770 BET HD 213 BET Jams 219 BET Soul 330 Big Ten 1 331 Big Ten 2 Programming Service offered in each package are subject to change and not all programming Included Channel Premium Available For Additional Cost services will be available at all times, Blackout restrictions apply. 1/15 1/14/2020 Extreme HD Print 344 Ch, 151 HD 333 Big Ten 3 85 Big Ten Network 585 Big Ten Network HD 258 Boomerang Brambleton Community 42 Access [HOA] 185 Bravo 685 Bravo HD 951 Brazzers 290 BYU Television # C 109 C-SPAN 110 C-SPAN 2 111 C-SPAN 3 599 Cars.TV HD 257 Cartoon Network 757 Cartoon Network HD 94 CBS Sports Network 594 CBS Sports Network HD 277 CGTN 420 Cinemax 920 Cinemax HD 421 Cinemax West 921 Cinemax West HD 236 Cinémoi 221 CMT 721 CMT HD 222 CMT Music 102 CNBC 602 CNBC HD+ 100 CNN 600 CNN HD 105 CNN International 190 Comedy Central 690 Comedy Central HD 695 Comedy.TV HD 163 Cooking Channel 663 Cooking Channel HD Programming Service offered in each package are subject to change and not all programming Included Channel Premium Available For Additional Cost services will be available at all times, Blackout restrictions apply.
    [Show full text]
  • Web 2.0 E-Publishing Tools: a Quick Guide
    Web 2.0 e-Publishing Tools: A Quick Guide MOHAMED AMIN EMBI Centre for Academic Advancement Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2012 Cetakan Pertama/First Printing 2012 Hak Cipta Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia/ Copyright Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 2012 Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Hak cipta terpelihara. Tiada bahagian daripada buku ini boleh diterbitkan semula, disimpan untuk pengeluaran atau ditukarkan ke dalam sebarang bentuk atau dengan sebarang alat juga pun, sama ada dengan cara elektronik, gambar serta rakaman dan sebagainya tanpa kebenaran bertulis daripada Pusat Pembangunan Akademik UKM terlebih dahulu. All right reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from Centre for Academic Advancement UKM. Diterbitkan di Malaysia oleh/Published in Malaysia by PUSAT PEMBANGUNAN AKADEMIK UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor D.E., MALAYSIA http://www.ukm.my/ppa e-mel: [email protected] Web 2.0 e-Publishing Tools: A Quick Guide Mohamed Amin Embi ISBN: 978-983-3168-25-5 Table of Contents i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER 1 SCRIBD What is Scribd?..………………………………………………………...161 Ways of using Scribd…………..………………………………………..161 Get started with Scribd...……………………………………………….183 References………………………………………………………………227 CHAPTER 2 ISSUU What is Issuu?........………………………………………………………18 Advantages of Issuu……………………………………………………...18 Using Issuu in the classroom...………………………………………….29
    [Show full text]
  • A FACULTY PERSPECTIVES and PRACTICES of SOCIAL PRESENCE in ONLINE POST-SECONDARY LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS a Dissertation SUBMITTED
    FACULTY PERSPECTIVES AND PRACTICES OF SOCIAL PRESENCE IN ONLINE POST-SECONDARY LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS A Dissertation SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Julie Ann Smith IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF EDUCATION Joyce Strand, Ph.D., Adviser April 2018 a Julie Ann Smith 2018 © b Acknowledgements This dissertation would not have been able without my patient adviser, Dr. Joyce Strand, who continued to support me throughout the years and help me to finally finish this research project. The last three years of trying to finish my dissertation included the caregiving to my mother and father. My father spent over two years in assistive care at the end of battling a long war with Alzheimer’s. He needed my mother’s help and she needed mine. This, and a concurrent divorce to my husband of 23 years, prolonged my ability to complete the writing of this dissertation, thus a long time had passed since the literature review. Many thanks go to my committee and doctoral chair who patiently provided me excellent advice in educational theory, interview and survey questionnaire revisions and/or dissertation guidance: Drs. Helen Mongan-Rallis, Craig Stroupe, Terrie Shannon, and Linda Deneen, and Chair Dr. Frank Guldbrandsen. Acknowledgements also go out to the faculty survey respondents and interviewees. Without their volunteer time, participation, and input, I would not have results to advance the study of social presence in the Community of Inquiry model. Additional thanks go to the faculty and staff and my cohort of the Education Doctorate in Teaching and Learning program at the University of Minnesota Duluth in the College of Education and Human Service Professions.
    [Show full text]
  • FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE JULY 21, 2020 NHL ANNOUNCES 2020 STANLEY CUP QUALIFIERS NORTH AMERICAN BROADCAST SCHEDULE Comprehensive Co
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE JULY 21, 2020 NHL ANNOUNCES 2020 STANLEY CUP QUALIFIERS NORTH AMERICAN BROADCAST SCHEDULE Comprehensive Coverage of All Stanley Cup Qualifying and Round Robin Games Across NBC Sports, Sportsnet, TVA Sports, NHL Network, NHL.TV and NHL Center Ice NEW YORK (July 21, 2020) – The National Hockey League today announced the national North American broadcast schedule for the 2020 Stanley Cup Qualifiers™, which begin Saturday, Aug. 1, with a slate of five games across NBC, NBCSN, NHL Network™, NHL.TV™ and NHL Center Ice® in the U.S., and Sportsnet, CBC and TVA Sports in Canada. The full North American broadcast schedule – including the 2020 Stanley Cup Qualifiers™ (Qualifying Round and Round Robin) and exhibition games (July 28-30) – is available in its entirety here. Starting times and national broadcast information for games listed as TBD will be announced when available. In the U.S., many games will be available in the local market on the team partner regional sports network. The NHL’s national North American broadcast schedule across NBC Sports, Sportsnet, TVA Sports, NHL Network, NHL.TV and NHL Center Ice includes: NBC Sports (U.S.) • NBC Sports will present up to 120 hours of coverage of the 2020 Stanley Cup Qualifiers™ on NBC, NBCSN and USA Network beginning Aug. 1, highlighted by at least 10 hours of wall-to-wall NHL action each day from Aug. 1-5, comprised of Qualifying Round and Round Robin matchups. • Beginning Saturday, Aug. 1, through Wednesday, Aug. 5, NBC Sports will present coverage from at least four games each day across NBC, NBCSN and USA Network, including some games that will be joined in progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-287 Before the Federal
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 02-287 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of: ) ) Implementation of the Satellite Home Viewer ) Improvement Act of 1999: ) CS Docket No. 00-2 ) Application of Network Non-Duplication, ) Syndicated Exclusivity, and Sports Blackout ) Rules To Satellite Retransmissions of Broadcast ) Signals ) ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION Adopted: October 10, 2002 Released: October 17, 2002 By the Commission: TABLE OF CONTENTS Paragraph I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 2 II. BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF PETITIONS................................................................... 3 III. ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION............................................................................................... 4 A. Transition Phase-In Period.................................................................................................. 4 B. Sports Blackout Rule .......................................................................................................... 6 1. The sports blackout rule applied to retransmission of network stations. ............... 6 2. Forty-eight hour Notification Period ..................................................................... 9 C. Definition of “Local” for Purposes of the Application of the Sports Blackout Rules ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A CHRONOLOGY of PRO FOOTBALL on TELEVISION: Part 2
    THE COFFIN CORNER: Vol. 26, No. 4 (2004) A CHRONOLOGY OF PRO FOOTBALL ON TELEVISION: Part 2 by Tim Brulia 1970: The merger takes effect. The NFL signs a massive four year $142 million deal with all three networks: The breakdown as follows: CBS: All Sunday NFC games. Interconference games on Sunday: If NFC team plays at AFC team (example: Philadelphia at Pittsburgh), CBS has rights. CBS has one Thanksgiving Day game. CBS has one game each of late season Saturday game. CBS has both NFC divisional playoff games. CBS has the NFC Championship game. CBS has Super Bowl VI and Super Bowl VIII. CBS has the 1970 and 1972 Pro Bowl. The Playoff Bowl ceases. CBS 15th season of NFL coverage. NBC: All Sunday AFC games. Interconference games on Sunday. If AFC team plays at NFC team (example: Pittsburgh at Philadelphia), NBC has rights. NBC has one Thanksgiving Day game. NBC has both AFC divisional playoff games. NBC has the AFC Championship game. NBC has Super Bowl V and Super Bowl VII. NBC has the 1971 and 1973 Pro Bowl. NBC 6th season of AFL/AFC coverage, 20th season with some form of pro football coverage. ABC: Has 13 Monday Night games. Do not have a game on last week of regular season. No restrictions on conference games (e.g. will do NFC, AFC, and interconference games). ABC’s first pro football coverage since 1964, first with NFL since 1959. Main commentary crews: CBS: Ray Scott and Pat Summerall NBC: Curt Gowdy and Kyle Rote ABC: Keith Jackson, Don Meredith and Howard Cosell.
    [Show full text]
  • A CHRONOLOGY of PRO FOOTBALL on TELEVISION: Part 1
    THE COFFIN CORNER: Vol. 26, No. 3 (2004) A CHRONOLOGY OF PRO FOOTBALL ON TELEVISION: Part 1 by Tim Brulia 1939- first telecast of a pro football game. Brooklyn Dodgers hosting Philadelphia Eagles on experimental station W2XBS (NBC). 1948- first season of network telecasts, ABC. First season of network telecast of NFL Championship game (Chicago Cardinals v. Philadelphia Eagles on ABC. Harry Wismer (?) commentator. Analyst – if any – unknown. Game played in blizzard in Shibe Park. 1949- ABC in second year of “game of the week” format. NFL Championship game televised to west coast only. Game between Philadelphia Eagles and Los Angeles Rams played in slop at Memorial Coliseum. Bob Kelley (?) commentator. Analyst – if any – unknown. 1950- ABC in third year of “game of the week” format. Both conferences had tiebreaker playoff games. Giants vs. Browns game televised by ABC. Bears vs. Rams game not televised to Chicago, but televised in Los Angeles. Commentator information unknown. NFL Championship game (Los Angeles Rams at Cleveland Browns) televised by ABC. Red Grange (play by play) and Joe Hasel (analyst). 1951- DuMont replaces ABC as prime telecaster of NFL games. DuMont provides “game of the week” format on a national basis, and has rights to 11 of 12 teams. Only Washington Redskins have own network. Redskins network is syndicated and sponsored by Amoco gasoline. Los Angeles Rams, after taking financial beating for televising all games, including home games locally, in 1950, institute first home game blackout policy. NFL Championship game (Cleveland Browns at Los Angeles Rams) televised by DuMont. Game is first to be televised coast to coast as transcontinental cable lines set up earlier in the year.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of Sports Leagues - the Chicago Bulls Case, 10 Marq
    Marquette Sports Law Review Volume 10 Article 3 Issue 1 Fall The conomicE s of Sports Leagues - The hicC ago Bulls Case Franklin M. Fisher Christopher Maxwell Evan Sue Schouten Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/sportslaw Part of the Entertainment and Sports Law Commons Repository Citation Franklin M. Fisher, Christopher Maxwell, and Evan Sue Schouten, The Economics of Sports Leagues - The Chicago Bulls Case, 10 Marq. Sports L. J. 1 (1999) Available at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/sportslaw/vol10/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLES THE ECONOMICS OF SPORTS LEAGUES - THE CHICAGO BULLS CASE FRANKiN M. FISHER* CHRISTOPHER MAXWELL" EVAN SUE SCHOUTEN*** I. INTRODUCTION Over the last two decades or so, there have been a number of anti- trust cases brought against sports leagues. Some have involved restric- tions on competition for players; many have involved relocations or planned relocations by individual teams. In these cases, the plaintiff has typically claimed that the teams that comprise a given league have con- spired to restrain competition among them. The defendant leagues have denied that such a thing is possible - arguing that they are either, de facto, a single entity incapable of conspiring with itself or, at a minimum, a joint venture acting pro-competitively. This paper lays out the economic analysis involved in understanding such issues, using as a leading example the case of the Chicago Bulls and WGN (the independent television superstation in Chicago) versus the National Basketball Association.1 Professor Fisher, one of the co-au- thors, was the economic expert testifying on behalf of the NBA in the second of two lawsuits relating to this matter.2 The matter began in 1990 when the NBA, and its member teams, voted to reduce the number of games that could be telecast by a super- station.
    [Show full text]
  • Applications: S
    Applications: S This chapter contains the following sections: • Sabah, on page 9 • Safari, on page 10 • SAFT, on page 11 • Sage, on page 12 • Sahibinden, on page 13 • Saks Fifth Avenue, on page 14 • Salesforce.com, on page 15 • Salesforce.com Live Agent, on page 16 • Sam's Club, on page 17 • Sametime, on page 18 • SAMR, on page 19 • Samsung, on page 20 • Samsung Push Notification, on page 21 • SANity, on page 22 • Sanook.com, on page 23 • SAP, on page 24 • SAP HostControl, on page 25 • SASCDN, on page 26 • SATNET, on page 27 • SATNET and Backroom EXPAK, on page 28 • SATNET Monitoring, on page 29 • SaveFrom, on page 30 • Sberbank of Russia, on page 31 • SBS, on page 32 • SCC Security, on page 33 • SCCM, on page 34 • SCCM Remote Control, on page 35 • SCCP, on page 36 • Schedule Transfer Protocol, on page 37 • schuelerVZ, on page 38 • Schwab, on page 39 • ScienceDirect, on page 40 Applications: S 1 Applications: S • SCO Desktop Administration Server, on page 41 • Sco I2 Dialog Daemon, on page 42 • SCO System Administration Server, on page 43 • SCO Web Server Manager 3, on page 44 • SCO WebServer Manager, on page 45 • scohelp, on page 46 • Scopia, on page 47 • Scopia Audio, on page 48 • Scopia Video, on page 49 • Scorecard Research, on page 50 • Scottrade, on page 51 • SCPS, on page 52 • Scribd, on page 53 • Scribd Upload, on page 54 • Scribol, on page 55 • SCSI-ST, on page 56 • SCTP, on page 57 • scx-proxy, on page 58 • SDNS-KMP, on page 59 • SDRP, on page 60 • Seamonkey, on page 61 • Search-Result.com, on page 62 • Searchnu, on page 63 •
    [Show full text]
  • How Antitrust Laws Can Be Used to Break up Directv's Exclusive Right to Telecast NFL's Sunday Ticket Package
    Federal Communications Law Journal Volume 64 Issue 1 Article 8 12-2011 Are You Ready for Some Football?: How Antitrust Laws Can Be Used to Break Up DirecTV's Exclusive Right to Telecast NFL's Sunday Ticket Package Ariel Y. Bublick Indiana University Maurer School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/fclj Part of the Administrative Law Commons, Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons, Communications Law Commons, Consumer Protection Law Commons, and the Legislation Commons Recommended Citation Bublick, Ariel Y. (2011) "Are You Ready for Some Football?: How Antitrust Laws Can Be Used to Break Up DirecTV's Exclusive Right to Telecast NFL's Sunday Ticket Package," Federal Communications Law Journal: Vol. 64 : Iss. 1 , Article 8. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/fclj/vol64/iss1/8 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Federal Communications Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Are You Ready for Some Football?: How Antitrust Laws Can Be Used to Break Up DirecTV's Exclusive Right to Telecast NFL's Sunday Ticket Package Ariel Y. Bublick* I. INTRODUCTION ................................. ....... 224 II. ANTITRUST BACKGROUND ....................... ....... 225 A. Antitrust and Section One of the Sherman Act................. 225 B. Rule of Reason Analysis................................ 225 C. The Single Entity Defense and its Application to the NFL.................................... 227 III. FOOTBALL ON TELEVISION................... ........... 230 A. The Origins of the NFL on Broadcast Television...........
    [Show full text]
  • Pioneer DTV Channel Guide Channel Channel Channel Network Number Pkg
    Pioneer DTV Channel Guide Channel Channel Channel Network Number Pkg. Network Number Pkg. Network Number Pkg. American Heroes Channel...................................... 84 ● Great American Country (GAC) ............................... 57 ● Turner Classic Movies............................................ 49 ● ● ● ● American Movie Classics (AMC)............................... 62 Hallmark Channel................................................. 90 TV Land................................................................ 60 ● ● ● ● ● Animal Planet....................................................... 61 Hallmark Movie Channel ..................................... 117 USA..................................................................... 44 ● ● ● ● ● ● Arts & Entertainment ............................................ 39 History Channel.................................................. 102 VH-1.................................................................... 76 ● ● ● ● ● BBC America......................................................... 71 HLN (Headline News)........................................... 100 Viceland............................................................... 88 ● ● ● ● ● BET......................................................................70 Home & Garden TV (HGTV) .................................. 103 Weather Channel ................................................ 104 ● ● ● ● ● Boomerang .......................................................... 40 Home Shopping Network (HSN)............................ 114
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission FCC 14-141 Before the Federal
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 14-141 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Sports Blackout Rules ) MB Docket No. 12-3 ) REPORT AND ORDER Adopted: September 30, 2014 Released: September 30, 2014 By the Commission: Chairman Wheeler and Commissioners Clyburn, Rosenworcel, Pai and O’Rielly issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 1 II. BACKGROUND.................................................................................................................................... 3 III. DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................................................ 6 A. Authority to Eliminate Sports Blackout Rules................................................................................. 7 B. Sports Blackout Rules No Longer Needed to Ensure that Sports Telecasts Are Widely Available to the Public................................................................................................................... 12 1. Primary Relevance to Professional Football ........................................................................... 13 2. NFL Gate Receipts and Other Revenues................................................................................. 14 3. Reduction in NFL Blackouts..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]