First Flush Characteristics in Separate Sewer Stormwater and Implications for Treatment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

First Flush Characteristics in Separate Sewer Stormwater and Implications for Treatment sustainability Article First Flush Characteristics in Separate Sewer Stormwater and Implications for Treatment Sara Egemose * , Anne B. Petersen, Melanie J. Sønderup and Mogens R. Flindt Department of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark; [email protected] (A.B.P.); [email protected] (M.J.S.); [email protected] (M.R.F.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +45-6550-7988 Received: 30 May 2020; Accepted: 18 June 2020; Published: 22 June 2020 Abstract: The characteristics of stormwater need focus due to climate change. Paved areas and recipients receiving more stormwater have an enhanced need for treatment before discharge to remove suspended solids, nutrients and xenobiotics. To handle and treat stormwater efficiently, knowledge concerning first flush patterns is crucial. Therefore, we have studied 12 entire rain events and correlated water volume, suspended solids, and dissolved and particulate phosphorus to catchment characteristics and precipitation characteristics. We have mainly studied smaller rain events (average 12.6 mm), as nearly 90% of the events in the studied catchment are <10 mm. We revealed first flush tendencies in 50% of the rain events, concerning both suspended solids and phosphorus. We also found significant correlations between catchment size and discharged masses, and most importantly between precipitation patterns and discharged mass per volume. A long dry period and low amount of rain during the previous event, as well as high rain intensity, gives a high chance of first flush. We conclude that stormwater treatment should focus on the initial part of the event, especially in areas with a lack of space and/or economy to handle and treat the entire event. Keywords: urban runoff; climate adaptation; pollution; retention 1. Introduction Climate change is among the many other effects causing more extreme weather, including cloud bursts, storms and droughts [1,2]. For the northern part of Europe, an increased amount of precipitation with more and heavier rain events is expected [3]. As an example, it is predicted that the number of 10 year events in Denmark will increase by 30% within the next 100 years [4]. Stormwater runoff from separate sewers is most often either discharged directly into the recipient or discharged after retention, e.g., in a wet stormwater pond [5]. Especially the first stormwater discharged will often have a larger content of particles and dissolved substances compared to the remaining part, as the first discharge contains all the accumulated particulate material from surfaces and the pipe systems [6,7]. This phenomenon is referred to as ‘first flush’, and is defined as a disproportionally high load of either concentration or mass in the first stormwater load during a rain event [7,8]. First flush depends on the dry period before the actual event, the intensity and duration of the rain event, the catchment type, and the transport distance of the discharge before the outlet (pipe length) [9]. Historically, different methods have been used to describe first flush events. A commonly used method is to express the percentage of mass transported along with a certain percentage of the volume [9], presented as normalized accumulated mass (L’) for each time as a function of normalized accumulated volume (V’) at each time [9]. A 45◦ bisector will then represent a proportional transport of mass and volume, see example in Figure1. If the curve is above the bisector, a relatively larger mass is transported in the discharge compared to the transported volume, whereas Sustainability 2020, 12, 5063; doi:10.3390/su12125063 www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability Sustainability 2020, 12, 5063 2 of 9 Sustainability 2020, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 9 the opposite is the case if the curve is below the bisector; in that case, the runoff is diluted. So, if first whereas the opposite is the case if the curve is below the bisector; in that case, the runoff is diluted. flush is occurring, the curve will be above the 45 line [9,10]. So, if first flush is occurring, the curve will be above◦ the 45° line [9,10]. Figure 1. Schematic L’/V’ curve—redrawn after [9]. L’ is the mass load and V’ is the volume. Both are Figure 1. Schematic L’/V’ curve — redrawn after [9]. L’ is the mass load and V’ is the volume. expressed as normalized accumulated values. Both are expressed as normalized accumulated values. TheThe numerical numerical definition definition of of the the first first flush flush varies. Some Some have have suggested suggested that that first first flush flush is is characterizedcharacterized by by an an 80% 80% mass mass transport transport during during the the first first 30% 30% of of the the volume—a volume—a 30/80 30/80 first first flush flush [10,11]. [10,11]. OthersOthers havehave arguedargued for for an evenan even stronger stronger characterization, characterization, where where 80% of the80% mass of the should mass be transportedshould be transportedduring thefirst during 20% the of thefirst volume—a 20% of the 20 volume—a/80 first flush 20/80 [7]. Finally,first flush some [7]. studies Finally, have some suggested studies ahave less suggestedstrict definition a less withstrict first definition flush at with 20/40 first or 25flush/50 asat 20/40 first volume or 25/50/mass as first [9]. volume/mass In general, first [9]. flush In general, is most firstcommon flush inis smallermost common catchments in smaller (<10 ha)catchments [11]. (< 10 ha) [11]. AA well-known well-known method method to to store store stormwater stormwater and and avoi avoidd hydraulic hydraulic effects effects on on the the recipient, recipient, as as well well asas to to remove remove primarily particulate substances, substances, is is wet stormwater ponds [12,13]. [12,13]. In In Denmark, Denmark, wet wet pondsponds are are often often designed designed with with a a controlled controlled outlet outlet in intensitytensity of of 1–2 1–2 L/s/ha L/s/ha catchment, catchment, a a permanent permanent wet wet 3 volumevolume of of 150–250 150–250 m m3/reduced/reduced hectare hectare and and a a storage storage volume, volume, if if properly properly designed designed [5]. [5]. The The reduced reduced areaarea is thethe impermeable impermeable proportion proportion of theof catchment.the catchment. Many Many of the of wet the stormwater wet stormwater ponds are ponds designed are designedwith an overflow with an facilityoverflow placed facility near placed the pond near outlet, the whichpond outlet, is activated which if theis activated pond’s storage if the capacitypond’s storageis exceeded. capacity The is result exceeded. is that The it will result most is likelythat it be will the most discharge likely that be the entered discharge the pond that first entered that willthe pondbe discharged first that firstwill duringbe discharged overflow. first Put during another overflow. way, the Put first another flush holdingway, the the first most flush polluted holding water the mostmight polluted be discharged water might through be discha the overflowrged through if the storagethe overflow capacity if the of storage the pond capacity is exceeded, of the pond and the is exceeded,cleaner water and the coming cleaner after water the firstcoming flush after is keptthe first in the flush pond is kept and in treated. the pond That and is treated. an undesirable, That is anand undesirable, environmentally and environmentall and economicallyy and ine economicallyfficient way ofinefficient handling way stormwater. of handling stormwater. Therefore,Therefore, aa greatergreater knowledge knowledge of theof the first first flush flush phenomenon phenomenon will support will support the knowledge the knowledge platform platformso that the so designthat the of design stormwater of stormwater ponds can ponds be optimized can be optimized and make and it possible make it topossible retain andto retain treat and first treatflush, first without flush, making without the making ponds the inappropriately ponds inappr big.opriately Barbosa big. and Barbosa Hvitved-Jacobsen and Hvitved-Jacobsen have suggested have suggestedthat the treatment that the treatment efficiency efficiency could be enhancedcould be enhanced by placing by the placing overflow the overflow facility at facility the inlet at the instead, inlet instead,so that theso that more the diluted, more diluted, cleaner stormwatercleaner stormwat cominger aftercoming first after flush first is bypassedflush is bypassed instead of instead the most of thepolluted most firstpolluted flush [first6]. Thisflush will [6]. not This change will thenot hydraulic change the load, hydraulic but it will load, entail but that it ifwill overflow entail that occurs, if overflowit will be occurs, the cleanest it will water be the that cleanest overflows. water A that model overflows. study in A progress model study made in on progress Danish ponds made hason Danishrevealed ponds that thishas revealed change in that design this canchange effectively in design increase can effectively the treatment increase effi ciency.the treatment efficiency. TheThe important important question question is is what what proportion proportion of of th thee first first flush flush should should be be kept kept in in the the stormwater stormwater pondpond and treated. ToTo provideprovide more more information information about about that, that, we we have have examined examined the the runo runoffff from from 12 rain 12 rainevents events in three in three different different catchments catchments with varying with va intensity,rying intensity, duration duration and dry and weather dry weather periods sinceperiods last sincerain event.last rain The event. aims The were aims (1) towere characterize (1) to characterize to what extent to what first extent flush first was flush observed was withobserved respect with to respect to suspended solid (SS), dissolved phosphorus (DP) and particulate phosphorus (PP), and (2) to evaluate which catchment and precipitation patterns the first flush was dependent on.
Recommended publications
  • First Flush Reactor for Stormwater Treatment for 6
    TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA/LA.08/466 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date June 2009 First Flush Reactor for Stormwater Treatment for 6. Performing Organization Code Elevated Linear Transportation Projects LTRC Project Number: 08-3TIRE State Project Number: 736-99-1516 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Zhi-Qiang Deng, Ph.D. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering 11. Contract or Grant No. Louisiana State University LA 736-99-1516; LTRC 08-3TIRE Baton Rouge, LA 70803 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Louisiana Transportation Research Center Final Report 4101 Gourrier Avenue December 2007-May 2009 Baton Rouge, LA 70808 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Conducted in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration 16. Abstract The United States EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) MS4 (Municipal Separate Storm Water Sewer System) Program regulations require municipalities and government agencies including the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (LADOTD) to develop and implement stormwater best management practices (BMPs) for linear transportation systems to reduce the discharge of various pollutants, thereby protecting water quality. An efficient and cost-effective stormwater BMP is urgently needed for elevated linear transportation projects to comply with MS4 regulations. This report documents the development of a first flush-based stormwater treatment device, the first flush reactor, for use on elevated linear transportation projects/roadways for complying with MS4 regulations. A series of stormwater samples were collected from the I-10 elevated roadway section over City Park Lake in urban Baton Rouge.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Influence of Urban Watershed Characteristics and Antecedent Climate on In-Stream Pollutant Dynamics
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-2016 Exploring the Influence of Urban atershedW Characteristics and Antecedent Climate on In-Stream Pollutant Dynamics Laurel Elizabeth Christian University of Tennessee, Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Hydraulic Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Christian, Laurel Elizabeth, "Exploring the Influence of Urban atershedW Characteristics and Antecedent Climate on In-Stream Pollutant Dynamics. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2016. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/4279 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Laurel Elizabeth Christian entitled "Exploring the Influence of Urban atershedW Characteristics and Antecedent Climate on In-Stream Pollutant Dynamics." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Environmental Engineering. Jon Hathaway, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: John Schwartz, Ana Szynkiewicz Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) Exploring the Influence of Urban Watershed Characteristics and Antecedent Climate on In-Stream Pollutant Dynamics A Thesis Presented for the Master of Science Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Laurel Elizabeth Christian December 2016 Copyright © 2016 by Laurel E.
    [Show full text]
  • First Flush Study 1999-2000 Report
    First Flush Study 1999-2000 Report June 2000 CTSW-RT-00-016 Contents Executive Summary Section 1 Introduction .................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Background ...............................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Overview of the First Flush Study .........................................................................1-1 1.2.1................................................................................................. Program Objective 1-1 1.2.2.......................................................................................................... Study Design 1-2 1.3 Report Organization.................................................................................................1-2 Section 2 Monitoring Locations and Equipment..................................................... 2-1 2.1 Monitoring Locations...............................................................................................2-1 2.2 Monitoring Equipment ............................................................................................2-6 Section 3 Sampling Handling, Analytical Methods, and Procedures................. 3-1 3.1 Storm Water Sampling.............................................................................................3-1 3.2 Wet Weather Response ............................................................................................3-1 3.3 Key Water Quality Constituents ............................................................................3-3
    [Show full text]
  • 28. AC20 Penright
    Downstream Sediment Interception A Unique Application for Proprietary Best Management Practice (BMP) Technology Peter Enright My Background Role at • Civil Site and Infrastructure Group • 6.5 years in the water/engineering industry • Design of water/wastewater/stormwater infrastructure • Master planning and hydraulic/hydrologic modelling Today’s Presentation Outline • Rainfall, Runoff and Water Quality • Downstream Structural BMP Application • Regulation of Sediment Removal and Sizing BMPs • Alternative Analysis Methodology • Conclusions Rainfall, Runoff and Water Quality Catchment Response Storm Event Surface Runoff Stormwater • Total Depth • Cover Type • Hydrology of Rainfall • Topography • Inlet Types • Distribution • Infiltration • Land Use Over Time • Connectivity • Pretreatment Hyetograph Hydrograph Catchment Response Examples Parking Lot Catchment Response Examples Sports Field Water Quality Overview Typical Stormwater Pollutants • Sediment AKA Total Suspended Solids (TSS) • Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Chloride, and Hydrocarbons • Micro-organisms and Toxic Organics Predicting Water Quality Factors Effecting Stormwater Pollutant Load • Land Use/Type of Pollutants Present • Frequency of Cleaning/Flushing Rainfall • Hydrology and Treatment Train • Intensity and Duration of Rainfall Event Concept of “First Flush” ➢ Pollutant concentration varies over time Unique BMP Application Existing Upstream Catchment Area Minimal TSS removal Opportunity Downstream Intercept upstream TSS • Retroactive treatment • Minimize downstream maintenance Regulation
    [Show full text]
  • Infiltration/Percolation Trench
    97 ACTIVITY: Infiltration / Percolation Trench I – 01 Targeted Constituents z Significant Benefit Partial Benefit { Low or Unknown Benefit z Sediment Heavy Metals Floatable Materials Oxygen Demanding Substances Nutrients Toxic Materials Oil & Grease { Bacteria & Viruses { Construction Wastes Implementation Requirements z High Medium { Low Capital Costs O & M Costs Maintenance { Training Description This BMP includes the infiltration / percolation trench, in which stormwater runoff is infiltrated into a shallow, excavated trench backfilled with stone aggregate rather than discharged to a surface channel. It is located below ground or at-grade and is usually designed to accept the first flush of stormwater runoff, temporarily store it, and eventually allow it to infiltrate into the subsoil through its sides and bottom. Infiltration rates in many areas of the state are typically poor due to clay soils and bedrock. Such locations may not be suitable of infiltration trench BMPs. Infiltration systems work best at sites having sandy loam types of soils. Areas containing karst topography and sinkholes may initially appear to have excellent infiltration, but should be considered as unreliable and will require very careful investigation and analysis. Selection Following are some criteria for placement of infiltration trenches: Criteria Infiltration trenches may be used for stormwater quality and stormwater detention at small project sites only if soil, geologic and groundwater conditions are suitable. Soils must have adequate infiltration rates as measured or tested in the field. No unfavorable geologic conditions shall be present that would indicate sinkholes or underground passageways. Infiltration trenches are often used in low to medium density, residential and commercial areas with limited and costly land space.
    [Show full text]
  • 4/25/2018 the Purpose of These Provisional Practices Is to Provide
    4/25/2018 The purpose of these provisional practices is to provide some guidance for new practices or those allowed to be credited by the update of Ohio’s Construction General Permit. These are provided until more fully updated and edited versions can be included in an updated Rainwater and Land Development manual (http://epa.ohio.gov/dsw/storm/technical_guidance.aspx). John Mathews, Ohio EPA, Division of Surface Water The following practices are included in this document: Structural Practices Underground Storage/Detention Infiltration Basin Pretreatment Runoff Reduction Practices Impervious Area Disconnection Sheet Flow to Grass Filter Strip or Conservation Area Grass Swale (for Runoff Reduction versus Conveyance only) Green Roof Rainwater Harvesting RAINWATER AND LAND DEVELOPMENT PROVISIONAL PRACTICE STANDARD #.# UNDERGROUND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS DATE: 4/20/18 Description Underground stormwater management systems (USMS) are large subsurface reservoirs located under pavement or other open space that manage stormwater runoff through infiltration, detention or a combination of the two. Underground reservoirs may simply be backfilled with stone, but also may utilize specially designed structures (e.g., concrete vaults, large‐diameter pipes, plastic “crates”, or plastic arches) to maximize storage in the space available. USMS must include adequate water quality pretreatment practices. Often, USMS are used to manage larger runoff events to meet local peak discharge requirements and, where site and soil conditions are favorable for infiltration, may be used to reduce runoff volume or meet groundwater recharge requirements. Credits Purpose/Objective Credit Available Requirements and Notes Runoff Reduction Volume (RRv) Underground infiltration systems RRv must fully infiltrate within can receive a runoff reduction 48 hr volume (RRv) credit to reduce the water quality volume (WQv) If the site is capable of requirement.
    [Show full text]
  • STORMWATER TREATMENT for CONTAMINANT REMOVAL Kirby S
    STORMWATER TREATMENT FOR CONTAMINANT REMOVAL Kirby S. Mohr Mohr Separations Research, Inc. Jenks, OK 918-299-9290 A paper presented at the 1995 Inte rnationalSy m p osium on Pub licW orksand th e Hum an Environm e nt, Seattle Washington, 1995 Abstract: Included in the paper are discussions of contaminants expected to be present in stormwater runoff, the expected concentrations of these contaminants, estimation methods for determining the amount of runoff water to be processed, and methods used to treat the water for contaminant removal. Information is presented on both US domestic and international treatment methods. Emphasis is placed on hydrocarbons in the stormwater and removal of these hydrocarbons to acceptable levels. A discussion is also provided concerning legal considerations in treating stormwater. Keywords: Stormwater, runoff, contaminants, oil and grease, and treatment. STORMWATER TREATMENT FOR CONTAMINANT REMOVAL Kirby S. Mohr Mohr Separations Research, Inc. Jenks, OK 918-299-9290 A paper presented at the 1995 Inte rnationalSy m p osium on Pub licW orksand th e Hum an Environm e nt, Seattle Washington, 1995 BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION Most of us have seen a small oil slick "rainbow" on the water runoff in a parking lot during a rainstorm. This constitutes a small but measurable amount of oil, and when multiplied by the hundreds of parking lots in a city can be a large amount of oil. Estimates indicate that as much as 1,200 tons per year of oil and grease enter the San Francisco Bay estuary every year, and other bodies of water receive as much or more.
    [Show full text]
  • First Flush Concepts for Suspended and Dissolved Solids in Small Impervious Watersheds
    First Flush Concepts for Suspended and Dissolved Solids in Small Impervious Watersheds John J. Sansalone1 and Chad M. Cristina2 Abstract: Eight rainfall-runoff events were examined from each of two small paved urban transportation land use watersheds (A =544 m2 and 300 m2) in an attempt to distill multiple definitions of the first flush phenomenon into a consistent framework and examine common volumetric capture requirements. Results indicated that two separate criteria must be employed to describe the delivery of suspended sediment concentration (SSC) and total dissolved solids (TDS) as aggregate indices of entrained particulate and dissolved matter. The concentration-based first flush criterion is defined by high initial SSC or TDS concentration in the early portion of a rainfall-runoff event with a subsequent rapid concentration decline. In contrast, the mass-based first flush (MBFF) has several published forms, shown to be equivalent herein. The MBFF is defined generally as a disproportionately high mass delivery in relation to corre- sponding flow volume. For mass-limited events, mass delivery was skewed towards the initial portion of the event while the mass delivery in flow limited events tended to follow the hydrograph. This study also investigated published estimates of the water quality volume (WQV); assuming that an in-situ Control Strategy or Best Management Practice (BMP) captures and treats only this WQV, while flows in excess of this volume bypass the BMP. For the two watersheds, results indicate that a relatively large runoff volume must be captured to effect meaningful reductions in mass and concentrations (as event mean concentrations) despite a disproportionately high mass delivery early in the event.
    [Show full text]
  • Villanova University the Graduate School Department of Civil And
    Villanova University The Graduate School Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering The Implications of the First Flush Phenomenon on Infiltration BMP Design A Thesis in Civil Engineering by Tom Batroney Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Water Resources and Environmental Engineering May 2007 Acknowledgements Without the love and support of my father, Matthew, and my mother, Carol, this thesis would not have been possible. I truly feel blessed to have been raised by such caring individuals. They instilled virtues such as hard work, dedication, honesty, and faith which provided the cornerstones in which to achieve my goals and aspirations in life. I also hold Dr. Robert Traver in the same regard and see in him all the same characteristics as my parents. His drive to make the VUSP, its members, and everyone within the Villanova community (which includes me) the best they can be is truly amazing. Combine his hard work with his expertise in everything regarding stormwater and you have a perfect combination for success. Upon first meeting Dr. Traver when visiting potential graduate schools, I knew I wanted to come to Villanova University immediately because I thought so highly of him then. Upon leaving Villanova I hold him in even higher regard and I feel forever in debt for everything he provided me. Very special thanks also to Clay Emerson who provided so much help and insight into my questions and problems. I affectionately called him "the master" for a reason. It was amazing how quickly he could diagnose a situation and present a brilliantly simple solution.
    [Show full text]
  • First Flush 2008 Monitoring Report
    Monterey Bay Sanctuary Citizen Watershed Monitoring Network 299 Foam Street Monterey, CA 93940 Bus. (831) 647-4227 Fax (831) 647-4250 First Flush 2008 Monitoring Report Prepared by: Lisa Emanuelson, Volunteer Monitoring Coordinator Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary 1 Acknowledgements Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary, Santa Cruz County Dept. of Environmental Health, San Mateo County Department of Environmental Health, San Mateo County RCD, Cities of: Santa Cruz, Capitola, Monterey, and Pacific Grove; Coastal Watershed Council, Monterey Bay Sanctuary Foundation, Monterey Regional Stormwater Management Program, Monterey Regional Water Pollution Control Agency, Sewer Authority Mid-Coastside, Stormwater Education Alliance 2 Introduction Pollutants are common in the environment due to our everyday activities, be it driving to work, gardening, walking the dog or making improvements to the exterior of our houses. During the dry weather months in the Monterey Bay area pollutants collect on our roadways, sidewalks, in our yards, parks and beaches. Once the winter rain begins to fall these pollutants are swept along with rain water into nearby creeks, storms drains and eventually into the ocean. The first rain storms pick up a whole summer’s worth of pollutants that if measured can give an indication of pollution sources and pollution loads going into the ocean. The Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary (MBNMS), the Coastal Watershed Council (CWC) and the San Mateo Resource Conservation District (SMRCD) teamed up with volunteers to monitor dry weather flows and the water flowing into the ocean from the first major rain storm in two events called the Dry Run and First Flush. Volunteer programs monitoring water quality have become a useful tool for local jurisdictions to meet their Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollution Discharge and Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Manual on Rainwater Harvesting
    The Texas Manual on Rainwater Harvesting Texas Water Development Board Third Edition The Texas Manual on Rainwater Harvesting Texas Water Development Board in cooperation with Chris Brown Consulting Jan Gerston Consulting Stephen Colley/Architecture Dr. Hari J. Krishna, P.E., Contract Manager Third Edition 2005 Austin, Texas Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank the following persons for their assistance with the production of this guide: Dr. Hari Krishna, Contract Manager, Texas Water Development Board, and President, American Rainwater Catchment Systems Association (ARCSA); Jen and Paul Radlet, Save the Rain; Richard Heinichen, Tank Town; John Kight, Kendall County Commissioner and Save the Rain board member; Katherine Crawford, Golden Eagle Landscapes; Carolyn Hall, Timbertanks; Dr. Howard Blatt, Feather & Fur Animal Hospital; Dan Wilcox, Advanced Micro Devices; Ron Kreykes, ARCSA board member; Dan Pomerening and Mary Dunford, Bexar County; Billy Kniffen, Menard County Cooperative Extension; Javier Hernandez, Edwards Aquifer Authority; Lara Stuart, CBC; Wendi Kimura, CBC. We also acknowledge the authors of the previous edition of this publication, The Texas Guide to Rainwater Harvesting, Gail Vittori and Wendy Price Todd, AIA. Disclaimer The use of brand names in this publication does not indicate an endorsement by the Texas Water Development Board, or the State of Texas, or any other entity. Views expressed in this report are of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Texas Water Development Board, or
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Sediment Transport Through an Established Vegetated Swale: Long Term Treatment Efficiencies and Deposition
    Water 2015, 7, 1046-1067; doi:10.3390/w7031046 OPEN ACCESS water ISSN 2073-4441 www.mdpi.com/journal/water Article Urban Sediment Transport through an Established Vegetated Swale: Long Term Treatment Efficiencies and Deposition Deonie Allen 1,*, Valerie Olive 2, Scott Arthur 1 and Heather Haynes 1 1 Institute of Infrastructure and Environment, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH144AS, UK; E-Mails: [email protected] (S.A.); [email protected] (H.H.) 2 Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre, Rankine Avenue, East Kilbride G750QF, UK; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-0131-451-8360. Academic Editor: Miklas Scholz Received: 31 October 2014 / Accepted: 4 March 2015 / Published: 12 March 2015 Abstract: Vegetated swales are an accepted and commonly implemented sustainable urban drainage system in the built urban environment. Laboratory and field research has defined the effectiveness of a vegetated swale in sediment detention during a single rainfall-runoff event. Event mean concentrations of suspended and bed load sediment have been calculated using current best analytical practice, providing single runoff event specific sediment conveyance volumes through the swale. However, mass and volume of sediment build up within a swale over time is not yet well defined. This paper presents an effective field sediment tracing methodology and analysis that determines the quantity of sediment deposited within a swale during initial and successive runoff events. The use of the first order decay rate constant, k, as an effective pollutant treatment parameter is considered in detail.
    [Show full text]