Elasmobranch and Osteichthyan Fauna of the Rattlesnake Mountain Sandstone, Aguja Formation (Upper Cretaceous; Campanian), West Texas

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Elasmobranch and Osteichthyan Fauna of the Rattlesnake Mountain Sandstone, Aguja Formation (Upper Cretaceous; Campanian), West Texas Elasmobranch and Osteichthyan Fauna of the Rattlesnake Mountain Sandstone, Aguja Formation (Upper Cretaceous; Campanian), West Texas. by Joseph A. Schubert, B.A., B.S. A Thesis In Geoscience Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Sciences Approved Thomas M. Lehman Chair of Committee James E. Barrick Sankar Chatterjee Dominick Casadonte Interim Dean of the Graduate School May, 2013 Copyright 2013, Joseph A. Schubert Texas Tech University, Joseph A. Schubert, May 2013 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thank you to Dr. Tom Lehman for his knowledge and help throughout the project, Steve and Jen Wick of the Ten Bits Ranch without whose fossil microsite, none of this would be possible, Dr. Mark Grimson and the Texas Tech Imaging Center for use of the Hitachi SEM, and Alton and Linda Schubert for their unwavering support. ii Texas Tech University, Joseph A. Schubert, May 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ii Abstract vi List of Figures viii 1. Introduction 1 Geologic Setting and Regional Stratigraphy 2 Stratigraphy of the Ten Bits Microsite 4 Methods 5 Tooth Morphology and Nomenclature 6 Rostral Teeth 8 Placoid Scales and Dermal Denticles 9 2. Systematic Paleontology 15 Hybodontidae 15 Lonchidiidae 16 Ginglymostomatidae 18 Orectolobidae 23 Squatinidae 24 Cretoxythinidae 26 Anacoracidae 27 Mitsukurinidae 31 Rhinobatidae 33 Hypsobatidae 35 Sclerorhynchidae 36 iii Texas Tech University, Joseph A. Schubert, May 2013 Ptychotrigonidae 42 Rhombodontidae 47 Myliobatidae 49 Trigonodontidae 55 Albulidae 55 Phyllodontidae 56 Semionotidae 58 Osteichthyes 58 Testudines 63 Mosasauridae 64 Crocodylia 65 Reptilia 65 Coprolites 66 3. Discussion 77 The Ten Bits Fauna 77 Ten Bits and Terlingua Microsites Compared 79 Paleobiogeography of the Western Interior Seaway 80 Comparison with the Judith River Fauna 82 Comparison with the Pictured Cliffs Fauna 83 Comparison with Blufftown Fauna 84 Comparison with the Black Creek Fauna 85 Characteristics of the Gulf Coast and Atlantic Fauna 86 4. Conclusions 93 iv Texas Tech University, Joseph A. Schubert, May 2013 References 97 v Texas Tech University, Joseph A. Schubert, May 2013 ABSTRACT A thin granular conglomerate within the Rattlesnake Mountain sandstone member of the Upper Cretaceous Aguja Formation on Ten Bits Ranch in Brewster County, Texas preserves a diverse assemblage of small teeth, denticles, vertebrae, and other bones of chondrichthyan and osteichthyan fishes. This thin layer of teeth and bones probably represents a winnowed lag deposit, concentrated by wave action in a coastal marine environment. The deposit, referred to herein as the "Ten Bits Microsite" is highly fossiliferous; screen-washing methods yielded about 5000 specimens. Chondrichthyan fishes are represented by 23 species,while identifiable osteichthyan fishes represent four species. Two of the three most abundantly occurring chondrichthyan species (Scapanorhynchus texanus and Ischyrhiza mira) are also the most common species in other middle to Late Campanian marine vertebrate faunas along the Gulf of Mexico, and Atlantic Coastal Plain. Ptychotrygon agujaenisis is abundant at Ten Bits, but unknown in correlative marine faunas elsewhere. The abundance and diversity of ptychotrigonid rays may be a unique feature of the Ten Bits fauna. The most common osteichthyan fishes found in the Ten Bits fauna (Paralbula casei and Albula sp.) are also reported elsewhere in Gulf and Atlantic Coastal Plain faunas, but they are rare there and subordinate to bony fishes not recovered at Ten Bits. Paralbula casei is a common bony fish found in marine vertebrate faunas of the Western Interior. The most common chondrichthyan fishes found in Western Interior faunas are either unknown or rare in the Ten Bits fauna, and the common Western Interior ray vi Texas Tech University, Joseph A. Schubert, May 2013 Myledaphus bipartitis does not occur at Ten Bits or any other Gulf or Atlantic Coast fauna. These differences probably reflect latitudinal variation, oceanic water circulation pattern, or variation in other environmental conditions between the Western Interior Seaway and the Gulf or Atlantic Coast that restricted the distributions of some marine fish species. The similarities between the Ten Bits fauna and those of the Atlantic and Gulf Coast indicate that western Texas was more closely allied biogeographically with that province than with the Western Interior of North America. One species tentatively identified in the Ten Bits fauna on the basis of a single tooth, Igdabatus indicus, is otherwise known only from Africa and Asia. If this identification is correct, it would represent the only known occurrence of the species in North America. This could reflect the chance preservation of a single individual outside of its normal range. Western Texas may have been near the northern limits of the range for tropical marine vertebrate species. vii Texas Tech University, Joseph A. Schubert, May 2013 LIST OF FIGURES 1. General geologic map of the Big Bend region of Texas. 11 2. Stratigraphic Relation of the Aguja and Pen Formations. 12 3. Stratigraphic section of the Aguja Formation. 13 4. Diagram of sawfish, tooth and denticle terminology. 14 5. Selachiian teeth. 68 6. Selachiian and Batoid teeth. 70 7. Batoid teeth . 72 8. Osteichthyan teeth. 74 9. Indeterminate rostral spines and Reptilia. 76 10. Late Cretaceous paleogeographic map of North America. 88 11. Paleogeographic map of North America during Campanian. 89 12. Paleogeographic reconstruction of the Western Interior during Campanian time. 90 13. Ten Bits Ranch Chondrichthyans Assemblage. 91 14. Ten Bits Ranch Osteichthyans Assemblage. 92 viii Texas Tech University, Joseph A. Schubert, May 2013 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Remains of fossil sharks and bony fishes are relatively common in Upper Cretaceous marine strata throughout western North America. Although similar remains have been reported from the Upper Cretaceous Aguja Formation in the Big Bend region of West Texas, only a few specimens from the upper part of the formation have been illustrated (e.g., Rowe et al., 1992), and no thorough account of the Aguja shark and bony fish material has been presented. The Aguja fauna is of particular interest because it provides a sample from the southernmost Late Cretaceous biome in the Western Interior Seaway of North America (Lehman, 1997). Contemporaneous shark and fish assemblages are known from sites farther north on the Great Plains, and also farther east on the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains. The Aguja fauna offers an opportunity to compare the marine vertebrate faunas in these separate biogeographic provinces. The primary goal of the present report is to provide systematic descriptions and illustrations of a diverse shark and bony fish assemblage recently recovered from the middle part of the Aguja Formation (Rattlesnake Mountain sandstone member). The shark and fish assemblage described in this report was collected at a site on the Ten Bits Ranch, about 15 km north of Study Butte in Brewster County, Texas (Fig. 1). The site is referred to here as the "Ten Bits Microsite" and was discovered by the owner of ranch, Mr. Steve Wick, who made the initial collection from the site and granted permission to undertake the present study. Subsequent study revealed that this 1 Texas Tech University, Joseph A. Schubert, May 2013 site is almost certainly the same one mentioned by McNulty and Slaughter (1972) that yielded the type specimens of the batoid chondrichthyan Ptychotrygon agujaensis. Specimens collected for the present study are catalogued at the Vertebrate Paleontology Laboratory of the Texas Memorial Museum in Austin, Texas and assigned to site TMM - 46018. Exact locality information is available at the Vertebrate Paleontology Laboratory. Geologic Setting and Regional Stratigraphy During Late Cretaceous (Campanian) time the Big Bend region of West Texas lay along the western edge of a shallow epicontinental sea, known as the Western Interior Seaway, that extended from the Gulf of Mexico northward through Montana and Canada. Throughout the Campanian Stage, transgressive and regressive cycles resulted in deposition of intertonguing marine and coastal sediments all along the western side of the Seaway (e.g., Kauffman, 1984). The Aguja Formation is an eastward-thinning series of paralic and marine sandstones that is interbedded with shale and lignite, and reflects deposition in varied shallow marine and coastal plain environments (Lehman, 1985). The fossil vertebrate fauna of the Aguja Formation is well known and includes a wide variety of terrestrial and marine animals (Rowe et al., 1992). However, the marine fauna has not been as extensively studied as the dinosaurs, crocodylians, and turtles. Lehman (1985) separated the Aguja Formation into several informal members that reflect two major progradational intervals separated by a transgressive marine interval (Fig. 2). The basal sandstone member intertongues with marine shale of the 2 Texas Tech University, Joseph A. Schubert, May 2013 underlying Pen Formation, and consists of fine-grained fossiliferous sandstone that records the initial progradational event in the Big Bend region (Bohannon, 1987). The lower shale member is composed of interbedded carbonaceous shale and lignite deposited landward of the prograding shoreline (Record, 1988). The Rattlesnake Mountain sandstone member is a thin transgressive sandstone interval that represents a shallow marine shelf environment (Macon, 1994).
Recommended publications
  • JVP 26(3) September 2006—ABSTRACTS
    Neoceti Symposium, Saturday 8:45 acid-prepared osteolepiforms Medoevia and Gogonasus has offered strong support for BODY SIZE AND CRYPTIC TROPHIC SEPARATION OF GENERALIZED Jarvik’s interpretation, but Eusthenopteron itself has not been reexamined in detail. PIERCE-FEEDING CETACEANS: THE ROLE OF FEEDING DIVERSITY DUR- Uncertainty has persisted about the relationship between the large endoskeletal “fenestra ING THE RISE OF THE NEOCETI endochoanalis” and the apparently much smaller choana, and about the occlusion of upper ADAM, Peter, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; JETT, Kristin, Univ. of and lower jaw fangs relative to the choana. California, Davis, Davis, CA; OLSON, Joshua, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Los A CT scan investigation of a large skull of Eusthenopteron, carried out in collaboration Angeles, CA with University of Texas and Parc de Miguasha, offers an opportunity to image and digital- Marine mammals with homodont dentition and relatively little specialization of the feeding ly “dissect” a complete three-dimensional snout region. We find that a choana is indeed apparatus are often categorized as generalist eaters of squid and fish. However, analyses of present, somewhat narrower but otherwise similar to that described by Jarvik. It does not many modern ecosystems reveal the importance of body size in determining trophic parti- receive the anterior coronoid fang, which bites mesial to the edge of the dermopalatine and tioning and diversity among predators. We established relationships between body sizes of is received by a pit in that bone. The fenestra endochoanalis is partly floored by the vomer extant cetaceans and their prey in order to infer prey size and potential trophic separation of and the dermopalatine, restricting the choana to the lateral part of the fenestra.
    [Show full text]
  • Living Systems
    K2 -3 Lesson Plan Living Systems Why not get a hands on experience with your students at Irukandji Shark and Ray Encounters to learn about the oceans ecosystems from Apex Predators to Primary producers. This Lesson plan is designed for students to observe and study the marine environment through interactive educational talks on Elasmobranches Students will be able to Identify and describe the structure and function of living things Interact with the most misunderstood species in our marine systems Shark and Ray and their ecosystems. To observe marine animals and their reliance on all species . Students will look at the impacts on pollutants on marine plants by performing water test on controlled water source for a report. observe the food chain within a marine environment Observe various life cycles of Sharks and Rays. Identify, describe and evaluates the interactions between living things and their effects on the environment Look at Importance of Chondricthyan fishes (Sharks, Rays and Chimeras) to the marine environment and society, through an insightful look into 6 species life history strategies .to identify current conservation efforts of aquariums and marine parks throughout Australia. Irukandji Shark and Ray Encounters K2 -3 Lesson Plan Learning Environment Objectives Observe different elasmobranches Core component is Group Work observe marine animals and relationships Ray Lagoon Food chain within a marine environment Tawny Terrian interactions between living things Fiddler Flats Identify current conservation efforts of aquariums and marine parks throughout Australia. Materials Step 4: Getting wet Ray lagoon 25 minutes This is where students will get a hands on experience feeding, touching and interacting Pencil with elasmobranches and teleost within their Activity sheet environment Ruler and clip board Objectives Observe the different forms of structure Steps from plates to teeth.
    [Show full text]
  • Chondrichthyan Fishes (Sharks, Skates, Rays) Announcements
    Chondrichthyan Fishes (sharks, skates, rays) Announcements 1. Please review the syllabus for reading and lab information! 2. Please do the readings: for this week posted now. 3. Lab sections: 4. i) Dylan Wainwright, Thursday 2 - 4/5 pm ii) Kelsey Lucas, Friday 2 - 4/5 pm iii) Labs are in the Northwest Building basement (room B141) 4. Lab sections done: first lab this week on Thursday! 5. First lab reading: Agassiz fish story; lab will be a bit shorter 6. Office hours: we’ll set these later this week Please use the course web site: note the various modules Outline Lecture outline: -- Intro. to chondrichthyan phylogeny -- 6 key chondrichthyan defining traits (synapomorphies) -- 3 chondrichthyan behaviors -- Focus on several major groups and selected especially interesting ones 1) Holocephalans (chimaeras or ratfishes) 2) Elasmobranchii (sharks, skates, rays) 3) Batoids (skates, rays, and sawfish) 4) Sharks – several interesting groups Not remotely possible to discuss today all the interesting groups! Vertebrate tree – key ―fish‖ groups Today Chondrichthyan Fishes sharks Overview: 1. Mostly marine 2. ~ 1,200 species 518 species of sharks 650 species of rays 38 species of chimaeras Skates and rays 3. ~ 3 % of all ―fishes‖ 4. Internal skeleton made of cartilage 5. Three major groups 6. Tremendous diversity of behavior and structure and function Chimaeras Chondrichthyan Fishes: 6 key traits Synapomorphy 1: dentition; tooth replacement pattern • Teeth are not fused to jaws • New rows move up to replace old/lost teeth • Chondrichthyan teeth are
    [Show full text]
  • Papers in Press
    Papers in Press “Papers in Press” includes peer-reviewed, accepted manuscripts of research articles, reviews, and short notes to be published in Paleontological Research. They have not yet been copy edited and/or formatted in the publication style of Paleontological Research. As soon as they are printed, they will be removed from this website. Please note they can be cited using the year of online publication and the DOI, as follows: Humblet, M. and Iryu, Y. 2014: Pleistocene coral assemblages on Irabu-jima, South Ryukyu Islands, Japan. Paleontological Research, doi: 10.2517/2014PR020. doi:10.2517/2018PR013 Features and paleoecological significance of the shark fauna from the Upper Cretaceous Hinoshima Formation, Himenoura Group, Southwest Japan Accepted Naoshi Kitamura 4-8-7 Motoyama, Chuo-ku Kumamoto, Kumamoto 860-0821, Japan (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract. The shark fauna of the Upper Cretaceous Hinoshima Formation (Santonian: 86.3–83.6 Ma) of the manuscriptHimenoura Group (Kamiamakusa, Kumamoto Prefecture, Kyushu, Japan) was investigated based on fossil shark teeth found at five localities: Himedo Park, Kugushima, Wadanohana, Higashiura, and Kotorigoe. A detailed geological survey and taxonomic analysis was undertaken, and the habitat, depositional environment, and associated mollusks of each locality were considered in the context of previous studies. Twenty-one species, 15 genera, 11 families, and 6 orders of fossil sharks are recognized from the localities. This assemblage is more diverse than has previously been reported for Japan, and Lamniformes and Hexanchiformes were abundant. Three categories of shark fauna are recognized: a coastal region (Himedo Park; probably a breeding site), the coast to the open sea (Kugushima and Wadanohana), and bottom-dwelling or near-seafloor fauna (Kugushima, Wadanohana, Higashiura, and Kotorigoe).
    [Show full text]
  • Extinction Risk and Conservation of the World's Sharks and Rays
    RESEARCH ARTICLE elife.elifesciences.org Extinction risk and conservation of the world’s sharks and rays Nicholas K Dulvy1,2*, Sarah L Fowler3, John A Musick4, Rachel D Cavanagh5, Peter M Kyne6, Lucy R Harrison1,2, John K Carlson7, Lindsay NK Davidson1,2, Sonja V Fordham8, Malcolm P Francis9, Caroline M Pollock10, Colin A Simpfendorfer11,12, George H Burgess13, Kent E Carpenter14,15, Leonard JV Compagno16, David A Ebert17, Claudine Gibson3, Michelle R Heupel18, Suzanne R Livingstone19, Jonnell C Sanciangco14,15, John D Stevens20, Sarah Valenti3, William T White20 1IUCN Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada; 2Earth to Ocean Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada; 3IUCN Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, NatureBureau International, Newbury, United Kingdom; 4Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, Gloucester Point, United States; 5British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, United Kingdom; 6Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia; 7Southeast Fisheries Science Center, NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, Panama City, United States; 8Shark Advocates International, The Ocean Foundation, Washington, DC, United States; 9National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New Zealand; 10Global Species Programme, International Union for the Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • APS Bulletin 28(1) March 2013
    Palæontological Society Bulletin AlbertaVOLUME 28 • NUMBER 1 www.albertapaleo.org MARCH 2013 ALBERTA PALÆONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY OFFICERS MEMBERSHIP: Any person with a sincere interest in President Wayne Braunberger (403) 278-5154 palaeontology is eligible to present their application for Vice-President Cory Gross (403) 617-2079 membership in the Society. (Please enclose membership Treasurer Mona Marsovsky (403) 547-0182 dues with your request for application.) Secretary Arnold Ingelson (403) 249-6748 Past-President Dan Quinsey (403) 247-3022 Single membership $20.00 annually Family or Institution $25.00 annually DIRECTORS Editor Howard Allen (403) 274-1858 THE BULLETIN WILL BE PUBLISHED QUARTERLY: Membership Vaclav Marsovsky (403) 547-0182 March, June, September and December. Deadline for sub- Programs Harold Whittaker (403) 286-0349 mitting material for publication is the 15th of the month Field Trips (To volunteer contact the President) prior to publication. COMMITTEES Society Mailing Address: Fossil Collection Howard Allen (403) 274-1858 Alberta Palaeontological Society Library Reg Spratley (403) 263-0556 P.O. Box 35111, Sarcee Postal Outlet Public Outreach Cory Gross (403) 617-2079 Calgary, Alberta, Canada T3E 7C7 Social Dan Quinsey (403) 247-3022 (Web: www.albertapaleo.org) Symposium Vaclav Marsovsky (403) 547-0182 Website Vaclav Marsovsky (403) 547-0182 Material for the Bulletin: The Society was incorporated in 1986, as a non-profit Howard Allen, Editor, APS organization formed to: 7828 Hunterslea Crescent, N.W. Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2K 4M2 a. Promote the science of palaeontology through study (E-mail: [email protected]) and education. b. Make contributions to the science by: NOTICE: Readers are advised that opinions expressed in 1) Discovery 2) Collection 3) Description the articles are those of the author and do not necessarily 4) Education of the general public reflect the viewpoint of the Society.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to the Classification of Elasmobranchs
    An introduction to the classification of elasmobranchs 17 Rekha J. Nair and P.U Zacharia Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi-682 018 Introduction eyed, stomachless, deep-sea creatures that possess an upper jaw which is fused to its cranium (unlike in sharks). The term Elasmobranchs or chondrichthyans refers to the The great majority of the commercially important species of group of marine organisms with a skeleton made of cartilage. chondrichthyans are elasmobranchs. The latter are named They include sharks, skates, rays and chimaeras. These for their plated gills which communicate to the exterior by organisms are characterised by and differ from their sister 5–7 openings. In total, there are about 869+ extant species group of bony fishes in the characteristics like cartilaginous of elasmobranchs, with about 400+ of those being sharks skeleton, absence of swim bladders and presence of five and the rest skates and rays. Taxonomy is also perhaps to seven pairs of naked gill slits that are not covered by an infamously known for its constant, yet essential, revisions operculum. The chondrichthyans which are placed in Class of the relationships and identity of different organisms. Elasmobranchii are grouped into two main subdivisions Classification of elasmobranchs certainly does not evade this Holocephalii (Chimaeras or ratfishes and elephant fishes) process, and species are sometimes lumped in with other with three families and approximately 37 species inhabiting species, or renamed, or assigned to different families and deep cool waters; and the Elasmobranchii, which is a large, other taxonomic groupings. It is certain, however, that such diverse group (sharks, skates and rays) with representatives revisions will clarify our view of the taxonomy and phylogeny in all types of environments, from fresh waters to the bottom (evolutionary relationships) of elasmobranchs, leading to a of marine trenches and from polar regions to warm tropical better understanding of how these creatures evolved.
    [Show full text]
  • OFR21 a Guide to Fossil Sharks, Skates, and Rays from The
    STATE OF DELAWARE UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE DELAWARE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OPEN FILE REPORT No. 21 A GUIDE TO FOSSIL SHARKS J SKATES J AND RAYS FROM THE CHESAPEAKE ANU DELAWARE CANAL AREA) DELAWARE BY EDWARD M. LAUGINIGER AND EUGENE F. HARTSTEIN NEWARK) DELAWARE MAY 1983 Reprinted 6-95 FOREWORD The authors of this paper are serious avocational students of paleontology. We are pleased to present their work on vertebrate fossils found in Delaware, a subject that has not before been adequately investigated. Edward M. Lauginiger of Wilmington, Delaware teaches biology at Academy Park High School in Sharon Hill, Pennsyl­ vania. He is especially interested in fossils from the Cretaceous. Eugene F. Hartstein, also of Wilmington, is a chemical engineer with a particular interest in echinoderm and vertebrate fossils. Their combined efforts on this study total 13 years. They have pursued the subject in New Jersey, Maryland, and Texas as well as in Delaware. Both authors are members of the Mid-America Paleontology Society, the Delaware Valley Paleontology Society, and the Delaware Mineralogical Society. We believe that Messrs. Lauginiger and Hartstein have made a significant technical contribution that will be of interest to both professional and amateur paleontologists. Robert R. Jordan State Geologist A GUIDE TO FOSSIL SHARKS, SKATES, AND RAYS FROM THE CHESAPEAKE AND DELAWARE CANAL AREA, DELAWARE Edward M. Lauginiger and Eugene F. Hartstein INTRODUCTION In recent years there has been a renewed interest by both amateur and professional paleontologists in the rich upper Cretaceous exposures along the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, Delaware (Fig. 1). Large quantities of fossil material, mostly clams, oysters, and snails have been collected as a result of this activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharkcam Fishes
    SharkCam Fishes A Guide to Nekton at Frying Pan Tower By Erin J. Burge, Christopher E. O’Brien, and jon-newbie 1 Table of Contents Identification Images Species Profiles Additional Info Index Trevor Mendelow, designer of SharkCam, on August 31, 2014, the day of the original SharkCam installation. SharkCam Fishes. A Guide to Nekton at Frying Pan Tower. 5th edition by Erin J. Burge, Christopher E. O’Brien, and jon-newbie is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. For questions related to this guide or its usage contact Erin Burge. The suggested citation for this guide is: Burge EJ, CE O’Brien and jon-newbie. 2020. SharkCam Fishes. A Guide to Nekton at Frying Pan Tower. 5th edition. Los Angeles: Explore.org Ocean Frontiers. 201 pp. Available online http://explore.org/live-cams/player/shark-cam. Guide version 5.0. 24 February 2020. 2 Table of Contents Identification Images Species Profiles Additional Info Index TABLE OF CONTENTS SILVERY FISHES (23) ........................... 47 African Pompano ......................................... 48 FOREWORD AND INTRODUCTION .............. 6 Crevalle Jack ................................................. 49 IDENTIFICATION IMAGES ...................... 10 Permit .......................................................... 50 Sharks and Rays ........................................ 10 Almaco Jack ................................................. 51 Illustrations of SharkCam
    [Show full text]
  • Comissão Organizadora
    ISSN 2175-7720 Paleontologia 2 Livro de Resumos ISSN 2175-7720 Paleontologia 3 Livro de Resumos Comitê Editorial: Valéria Gallo Hilda Maria Andrade da Silva Capa e Identidade Visual: Mapinguari Design Projeto gráfico interno e editoração: Rafael Fernandes Lopes da Silva XXI Congresso Brasileiro de Paleontologia: A paleontologia e os eventos globais. 2009, Belém, Pará, Brasil. ISSN: 2175-7720 1. Paleontologia 2. Geociências 3. Congresso Brasileiro de Paleontologia Paleontologia 4 Sobre a Logomarca A Logomarca do XXI Congresso Brasileiro de Paleontologia O gênero Orthaulax é um representante extinto da família Strombidae, endêmico da província paleobiogeográfica Caribeana, vivente entre o Oligoceno Superior e o Mioceno Inferior. Do ponto de vista paleoambiental teria vivido em ambiente marinho de águas rasas, quentes, límpidas, agitadas e com salinidade normal. O processo envolvente da sua ultima volta tornou a concha bastante sólida e maciça, permitindo que habitasse ambiente de grande agitação, como os biohermas, pequenas edificações recifais. Na Formação Pirabas, a espécie Orthaulax pugnax (Heilprin, 1887) foi reconhecida por Maury (1925), e corroborada em pesquisas subseqüentes. Estudos realizados por Cândido Simões Ferreira, delimitaram nos calcários aflorantes no litoral nordeste do Estado do Pará e noroeste do Estado do Maranhão, uma zona caracterizada por elementos estenobiônticos, típicos de recifes de corais. A espécie O. pugnax, associada com algas coralíneas, corais hermatípicos e equinóides regulares são as formas mais características que contribuíram para a edificação do bioherma. Assim, este gastrópode constitui-se em um elemento importante da Formação Pirabas, por ter sido o primeiro táxon utilizado para datar esta unidade litoestratigráfica como oligo-miocênica, bem como seu decisivo papel para correlação com outras unidades sincrônicas da Província Biogeográfica Caribeana, permitindo delimitar no norte do Brasil, a sua extremidade sul.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Ecology of Spinosaurus: Shoreline Generalist Or Aquatic Pursuit Specialist?
    Palaeontologia Electronica palaeo-electronica.org Evaluating the ecology of Spinosaurus: Shoreline generalist or aquatic pursuit specialist? David W.E. Hone and Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. ABSTRACT The giant theropod Spinosaurus was an unusual animal and highly derived in many ways, and interpretations of its ecology remain controversial. Recent papers have added considerable knowledge of the anatomy of the genus with the discovery of a new and much more complete specimen, but this has also brought new and dramatic interpretations of its ecology as a highly specialised semi-aquatic animal that actively pursued aquatic prey. Here we assess the arguments about the functional morphology of this animal and the available data on its ecology and possible habits in the light of these new finds. We conclude that based on the available data, the degree of adapta- tions for aquatic life are questionable, other interpretations for the tail fin and other fea- tures are supported (e.g., socio-sexual signalling), and the pursuit predation hypothesis for Spinosaurus as a “highly specialized aquatic predator” is not supported. In contrast, a ‘wading’ model for an animal that predominantly fished from shorelines or within shallow waters is not contradicted by any line of evidence and is well supported. Spinosaurus almost certainly fed primarily from the water and may have swum, but there is no evidence that it was a specialised aquatic pursuit predator. David W.E. Hone. Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK. [email protected] Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. Department of Geology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742 USA and Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20560 USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Aperçus D'un Écosystème Marin Et De Ses Abords Au Maastrichtien
    Aperçus d’un écosystème marin et de ses abords au Maastrichtien supérieur: le site nigérien d’In Daman et la mer épicontinentale du bassin des Iullemmeden Marc Michaut To cite this version: Marc Michaut. Aperçus d’un écosystème marin et de ses abords au Maastrichtien supérieur: le site nigérien d’In Daman et la mer épicontinentale du bassin des Iullemmeden. 2013. hal-00797424 HAL Id: hal-00797424 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00797424 Preprint submitted on 6 Mar 2013 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Aperçus d’un écosystème marin et de ses abords au Maastrichtien supérieur : le site nigérien d’In Daman et la mer épicontinentale du bassin des Iullemmeden Marc Michaut Institut préparatoire aux études scientifiques et techniques, Université de Tunis, La Marsa, Tunisie 5 mars 2013 Abstract Many studies were performed for several decades about Nigerian maastrichtian sites and other fossiliferous sites of the same epoch in their vicinity, which allow us to reconstruct the marine epicontinental ecosystem and associated coastal ecosystems with a fair amount of accuracy. We begin with a detailed compilation of the re- sults obtained about biotope and taphocenose.
    [Show full text]