DOCSLIB.ORG

Sophocles the Honeybee: Dramatic Context and Interaction Jennifer Sara Starkey University of Colorado at Boulder, [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sophocles the Honeybee: Dramatic Context and Interaction Jennifer Sara Starkey University of Colorado at Boulder, Jennifer.S.Starkey@Colorado.Edu University of Colorado, Boulder CU Scholar Classics Graduate Theses & Dissertations Classics Spring 1-1-2012 Sophocles the Honeybee: Dramatic Context and Interaction Jennifer Sara Starkey University of Colorado at Boulder, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholar.colorado.edu/clas_gradetds Part of the Classical Literature and Philology Commons Recommended Citation Starkey, Jennifer Sara, "Sophocles the Honeybee: Dramatic Context and Interaction" (2012). Classics Graduate Theses & Dissertations. Paper 4. This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by Classics at CU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Classics Graduate Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CU Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SOPHOCLES THE HONEYBEE: DRAMATIC CONTEXT AND INTERACTION by JENNIFER SARA STARKEY B.A., St. Olaf College, 2007 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Classics 2012 This thesis entitled: Sophocles the Honeybee: Dramatic Context and Interaction written by Jennifer Sara Starkey has been approved for the Department of Classics _____________________________________ John C. Gibert _____________________________________ Peter A. Hunt Date______________ The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we Find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards Of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. iii Starkey, Jennifer Sara (Ph.D., Classics) Sophocles the Honeybee: Dramatic Context and Interaction Thesis directed by Associate Professor John C. Gibert There have been very few large-scale studies of Sophocles’ poetic interactions with the other playwrights of the fifth century B.C. This project seeks to fill that gap by putting Sophocles in contact with both tragic and comic poets and offering new readings of his work from that angle. By examining Sophocles as an exploiter of other poets’ dramatic ideas and strategies, I hope to demonstrate his versatility and creativity; by viewing him as a source of inspiration for other dramatists, I aim to show his relevance and significance within his own time. The ancient Life of Sophocles claims that he was nicknamed melitta (“honeybee”) for his ability to glean the best elements from the work of other poets and integrate them effectively into his own plays. Taking this idea as my starting point, I explore the “immediate dramatic context” of each of Sophocles’ late tragedies (Electra, Philoctetes, and Oedipus at Colonus) to show how they draw extensively on specific plays of Aeschylus and Euripides. I also aim to complicate common views of dramatic intertextuality, which, in light of the competitions at the festivals, is often understood in terms of simple imitation or rejection; in particular, the relationship between Sophocles and Euripides has frequently been reduced to one of polemics and polarity. My interest is rather in a type of engagement that was basically collaborative and constructive, and I argue that Sophocles and Euripides, as a result of working closely with each other’s material iv over the course of several decades, were actually much more similar in terms of style and interest than is usually recognized. Finally, drawing on recent work on comic intertextuality, I argue that all fifth-century playwrights were essentially honeybees in their own right, eager to experiment with recent innovations and developments in the theater. Sophocles thus becomes the basis for a more general model of dramatic inspiration and composition in the late fifth century: in contrast to the view that tragedy was becoming exhausted or even dying out, the poets continued to find new ways to exploit, expand, and build on each other’s material. This project is dedicated to the memory of my grandmother, Kay Mathias, who passed away on the Ides of March, 2011. vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My thanks go first and foremost to John Gibert, who supervised my research, diligently read countless drafts, and patiently offered criticism on everything from word choice to overall conception; our many wide-ranging discussions have been invaluable to me. I am also grateful for the new perspectives and depth of scholarship provided by my readers and examiners, Peter Hunt, Lauri Reitzammer, Peter Knox, and Philip Holt. I have received further encouragement and support from Gwen Compton-Engle, Beth Dusinberre, and Alan Sommerstein; Alan especially deserves my thanks for his hospitality at the University of Nottingham during the spring of 2012, when he took the time to read my entire project and discuss with me its strengths, weaknesses, and potentialities. My work that year was funded by a dissertation fellowship from the Center for Humanities and the Arts at the University of Colorado, which I am happy to acknowledge here. Finally, I offer my thanks to those who have had to live with me for the past several years and have enriched the time with good humor and thoughtful conversation on a variety of topics, especially Reina and Kris Callier, Michaela Börner, Myrci Konyak, and of course my parents, who have supported my interest in the Classics from the beginning. vii CONTENTS Abbreviations and References ............................................................................. viii 1 Introduction: Contextualizing Sophocles .....................................................1 The Scholarly Background: Comedy ...............................................3 The Scholarly Background: Tragedy ...............................................7 Sophocles Μέλιττα.........................................................................10 2 Sophocles Θεοφιλής? Fragmentation and Agnosticism in Electra ...........................................20 Aeschylus’ Choephoroi: Convergence ..........................................26 Sophocles’ Electra: Fragmentation................................................38 Conclusion: “Matricide and Good Spirits”? ..................................73 3 Sophocles Ποιητής and the Art of Dramatic Composition ........................82 Helen: Costume, Deception, and the Dramatic Illusion ................93 Philoctetes: The Ethics of Role-playing ......................................102 Orestes: The Chaos of Performance ............................................127 Conclusion: Tragedy and Absurdity ............................................147 4 Sophocles Ἠθοποιός and Euripides’ Theban Plays .................................156 The Heroism of Antigone ............................................................162 The Return of Polyneices .............................................................181 Oedipus, Power, and Pollution.....................................................199 Conclusion: Distorted Reflections ...............................................210 5 Sophocles Κωμῳδούμενος .......................................................................215 Level 1: Collision of Registers ....................................................220 Level 2: Appropriation and Conversion ......................................237 Level 3: Integration ......................................................................251 Conclusion: A Glance at Aristophanes and Euripides .................275 6 General Conclusion: Sophocles Θεατρικός .............................................287 Bibliography ........................................................................................................293 viii ABBREVIATIONS AND REFERENCES IG F.H. Gaertringen et al., eds. Inscriptiones Graecae.2 1924-. Berlin. LSJ H.G. Liddell and R. Scott. 1940. A Greek-English Lexicon.9 Rev. H. Stuart- Jones. Suppl. 1968, 1996. Oxford. D-K H. Diels and W. Kranz, eds. 1952. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker.6 3 vols. Berlin. DFA Pickard-Cambridge, A.W. 1968. The Dramatic Festivals of Athens.2 Rev. J. Gould & D.M. Lewis. Oxford. TrGF B. Snell, R. Kannicht, and S. Radt, eds. 1971-2009. Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta. 5 vols. Göttingen. PCG R. Kassel and C. Austin, eds. 1983-. Poetae Comici Graeci. 8 vols. Berlin. CCG C. Collard, M.J. Cropp, and J. Gibert. 2006. Euripides: Selected Fragmentary Plays II. Warminster. SFT A.H. Sommerstein, D. Fitzpatrick, and T.H. Talboy. 2006. Sophocles: Selected Fragmentary Plays I. Oxford: Oxbow Books. ST A.H. Sommerstein, and T.H. Talboy. 2012. Sophocles: Selected Fragmentary Plays II. Oxford: Oxbow Books. AC Acta Classica AevAnt Aevum Antiquum AJP American Journal of Philology AncSoc Ancient Society BICS Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies C&M Classica et Mediaevalia CA Classical Antiquity CB Classical Bulletin CJ Classical Journal CML Classical and Modern Literature CP Classical Philology CPCP California Publications in Classical Philology ix CQ Classical Quarterly CR Classical Review CW Classical World G&R Greece and Rome GRBS Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies HSCP Harvard Studies in Classical Philology ICS Illinois Classical Studies JHS Journal of Hellenic Studies LCM Liverpool Classical Monthly MD Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici MH Museum Helveticum PCPS Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society P&L Philosophy and Literature RhM Rheinisches Museum SCI Scripta Classica Israelica TAPA Transactions of the American Philological Association WJA Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft WS Wiener Studien YCS Yale Classical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Middle Comedy: Not Only Mythology and Food
    Acta Ant. Hung. 56, 2016, 421–433 DOI: 10.1556/068.2016.56.4.2 VIRGINIA MASTELLARI MIDDLE COMEDY: NOT ONLY MYTHOLOGY AND FOOD View metadata, citation and similar papersTHE at core.ac.ukPOLITICAL AND CONTEMPORARY DIMENSION brought to you by CORE provided by Repository of the Academy's Library Summary: The disappearance of the political and contemporary dimension in the production after Aris- tophanes is a false belief that has been shared for a long time, together with the assumption that Middle Comedy – the transitional period between archaia and nea – was only about mythological burlesque and food. The misleading idea has surely risen because of the main source of the comic fragments: Athenaeus, The Learned Banqueters. However, the contemporary and political aspect emerges again in the 4th c. BC in the creations of a small group of dramatists, among whom Timocles, Mnesimachus and Heniochus stand out (significantly, most of them are concentrated in the time of the Macedonian expansion). Firstly Timocles, in whose fragments the personal mockery, the onomasti komodein, is still present and sharp, often against contemporary political leaders (cf. frr. 17, 19, 27 K.–A.). Then, Mnesimachus (Φίλιππος, frr. 7–10 K.–A.) and Heniochus (fr. 5 K.–A.), who show an anti- and a pro-Macedonian attitude, respec- tively. The present paper analyses the use of the political and contemporary element in Middle Comedy and the main differences between the poets named and Aristophanes, trying to sketch the evolution of the genre, the points of contact and the new tendencies. Key words: Middle Comedy, Politics, Onomasti komodein For many years, what is known as the “food fallacy”1 has been widespread among scholars of Comedy.
    [Show full text]
  • Law and Economy in Classical Athens: [Demosthenes], “Against Dionysodorus”
    is is a version of an electronic document, part of the series, Dēmos: Clas- sical Athenian Democracy, a publicationpublication ofof e Stoa: a consortium for electronic publication in the humanities [www.stoa.org]. e electronic version of this article off ers contextual information intended to make the study of Athenian democracy more accessible to a wide audience. Please visit the site at http:// www.stoa.org/projects/demos/home. Law and Economy in Classical Athens: [Demosthenes], “Against Dionysodorus” S is article was originally written for the online discus- sion series “Athenian Law in its Democratic Context,” organized by Adriaan Lanni and sponsored by Harvard University’s Center for Hellenic Studies. (Suggested Read- ing: Demosthenes , “Against Dionysodorus.”) Sometime around a man named Dareius brought a private action in an Athenian court against a merchant called Dionysodorus. Dareius and his business partner Pamphilus had made a loan to Dionysodorus and his part- ner Parmeniscus for a trading voyage to Egypt and back. In his opening words of his speech to the court, Dareius describes the risks confronting men who made maritime loans. Edward M. Harris, “Law and Economy in Classical Athens: [Demosthenes] ‘Against Dionysodorus,’” in A. Lanni, ed., “Athenian Law in its Democratic Context” (Center for Hellenic Studies On-Line Discussion Series). Republished with permission in C. Blackwell, ed., Dēmos: Classical Athenian Democracy (A.(A. MahoneyMahoney andand R.R. Scaife,Scaife, edd.,edd., e Stoa: a consortium for electronic publication in the humanities [www.stoa.org], . © , E.M. Harris. “We who decide to engage in maritime trade and to en- trust our property to other men are clearly aware of this fact: the borrower has an advantage over us in every re- spect.
    [Show full text]
  • A Complete List of Terms to Know
    Classical Drama and Theatre: A Complete List of Terms to Know Terms to Know From Section 1: Chapter 1 Theatre History Theatron Historiography Institution Historia Theatrical Herodotus Language Ionian Revolution Impersonation Primary Evidence Audience Secondary Evidence Positivism Inference Progress Cogent Primitive Tripartition E.K. Chambers Battle of Thermopylae Chorus Ibn Kahldun Chapter 2 Transitional Forms Herodotus Bronislaw Malinowski The Histories Aetiological Relics Claude Levi-Strauss Fossils Structuralism Aristotle Lumpers James Frazer, The Golden Bough Splitters Anthropology Mimetic Positivism Chapter 3 Age of Tyrants Pelasgians Tyrannos Indo-Europeans Pisistratus of Athens Proto-Indo-European Attic Ionians Age of Lawgivers Athens Solon Asia Minor Sicily Dorians Black Sea Peloponnese Age of Colonization Trojan War Magna Graecia Epic Phoenicians Homer Lyric Age The Iliad Lyre Heinrich Schliemann Lyric Poetry Troy Sappho Polis Classical Age 1 Chapter 4.1 City Dionysia Thespis Ecstasy Tragoidia "Nothing To Do With Dionysus" Aristotle Year-Spirit The Poetics William Ridgeway Dithyramb Tomb-Theory Bacchylides Hero-Cult Theory Trialogue Gerald Else Dionysus Chapter 4.2 Niches Paleontologists Fitness Charles Darwin Nautilus/Nautiloids Transitional Forms Cultural Darwinism Gradualism Pisistratus Steven Jay Gould City Dionysia Punctuated Equilibrium Annual Trading Season Terms to Know From Section 2: Chapter 5 Sparta Pisistratus Peloponnesian War Athens Post-Classical Age Classical Age Macedon(ia) Persian Wars Barbarian Pericles Philip
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Greek and Italiote Worlds: a Local Tarentine Perspective
    Beyond the Greek and Italiote Worlds: A Local Tarentine Perspective Alexandru Martalogu Department of History and Classical Studies McGill University, Montreal November 2017 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of the Master’s of Arts (History and Classical Studies – Ancient History) © Alexandru Martalogu 2017 Martalogu 2 Table of Contents Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………. 3 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………... 6 Chapter One: Taras’ Modest Beginnings………………………………………………… 18 Chapter Two: The “World-Wide” Cultural and Economic Greek Network……………... 24 Chapter Three: The Italiote World: Between Warfare and Cooperation……………….... 36 Chapter Four: Breaking the Chains: Tarentine Emancipation and Local Identity……….. 51 Conclusion: Beyond Taras and its Golden Age………………………………………….. 74 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………….84 APPENDIX A…………………………………………………………………………......94 APPENDIX B……………………………………………………………………………..98 Martalogu 3 Abstract From its foundation in 706 B.C., Taras took advantage of its favourable geographic location and of its region’s long history of trade and network connections. Placed within previous discussions on the importance of the seas and other interactions in network and identity formation, this thesis seeks to contextualize and reveal the evolution of a distinctly local Tarentine identity. Whereas in previous works the importance of the “local” and its influence have been studied for the purpose of broader topics, the “local” city of Taras and its citizens are the primary focus of this research in an attempt to step away from the negative connotations associated with the city-state by the surviving ancient sources. The analysis of Taras’ early history reveals that the polis was founded in a region with a long history of pre-existing network connections, as well as a tendency to depend more heavily upon long distance connections with the Greek world.
    [Show full text]
  • Memory and Performance: Strategies of Identity in the Orphic-Bacchic Lamellae by Mark Frederick Mcclay
    Memory and Performance: Strategies of Identity in the Orphic-Bacchic Lamellae By Mark Frederick McClay A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Classics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Mark Griffith, Chair Professor Nikolaos Papazarkadas Professor James I. Porter Fall 2018 Copyright 2018, Mark Frederick McClay Abstract Memory and Performance: Strategies of Identity in the Orphic-Bacchic Lamellae by Mark Frederick McClay Doctor of Philosophy in Classics University of California, Berkeley Professor Mark Griffith, Chair This dissertation is a treatment of the Orphic-Bacchic lamellae, a collection of small gold tablets that were deposited in the graves of Dionysiac mystery initiates, mostly during the 4th/3rd c. BCE. So far, thirty-eight of these have been discovered, from various sites in Sicily, Magna Graecia, Northern Greece, Crete, and the Peloponnese. The tablets were deposited in the graves of both men and women, and they are inscribed with short poetic texts, mostly in hexameters, that offer promises of postmortem happiness. Scholarship on these objects has traditionally focused on the sacral and eschatological language of the texts and their underlying doctrinal structure. Past interpretations, and discussions of “Orphism” more generally, have relied on propositional definitions of “religion” that are centered on belief and on the scriptural authority of sacred texts rather than ritual or sensory experience. Following recent critiques of these models in general (and of their application to Orphic phenomena in particular), I consider the gold leaves in their social context as objects produced, handled, and disseminated by ritual performers.
    [Show full text]
  • Plutarch, Apuleius, and Vettius Agorius Praetextatus ______
    MYSTERIES, PHILOSOPHY, AND SELF-REPRESENTATION IN IMPERIAL ROME: PLUTARCH, APULEIUS, AND VETTIUS AGORIUS PRAETEXTATUS _______________________________________ A Dissertation presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri-Columbia _______________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy _____________________________________________________ by ANDREW J. BUCHHEIM Dr. Dennis Trout, Dissertation Supervisor December 2019 © Copyright by Andrew J. Buchheim 2019 All Rights Reserved The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled MYSTERIES, PHILOSOPHY, AND SELF- REPRESENTATION IN IMPERIAL ROME: PLUTARCH, APULEIUS, AND VETTIUS AGORIUS PRAETEXTATUS presented by Andrew J. Buchheim, a candidate for the degree of doctor of philosophy, and hereby certify, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. ____________________________________________________________ Professor Dennis Trout ____________________________________________________________ Professor Anatole Mori ____________________________________________________________ Professor Raymond Marks ____________________________________________________________ Professor Barbara Wallach ____________________________________________________________ Professor Susan Langdon DEDICATION To my grandfather Wayne Buchheim who inspired me in this pursuit. I hope he would be proud of my efforts. Thanks also to my father for his help and support and to my brother for no particular reason. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Dr. Dennis Trout for all his help. His graduate seminar on Latin epigraphy refocused my general interest in mystery cults into what would become the current project. I thank him for introducing me to Praetextatus and to Late Antique Rome. I would also like to thank my fellow graduate students, Kristin Harper and Claire McGraw. They were always invaluable resources for help in developing my ideas, and they provided me insightful directions for my research.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Macedonians
    Ancient Macedonians This article is about the native inhabitants of the historical kingdom of Macedonia. For the modern ethnic Greek people from Macedonia, Greece, see Macedonians (Greeks). For other uses, see Ancient Macedonian (disambiguation) and Macedonian (disambiguation). From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ANCIENT MACEDONIANS ΜΑΚΕΔΌΝΕΣ Stag Hunt Mosaic, 4th century BC Languages. Ancient Macedonian, then Attic Greek, and later Koine Greek Religion. ancient Greek religion The Macedonians (Greek: Μακεδόνες, Makedónes) were an ancient tribe that lived on the alluvial plain around the rivers Haliacmonand lower Axios in the northeastern part of mainland Greece. Essentially an ancient Greek people,[1] they gradually expanded from their homeland along the Haliacmon valley on the northern edge of the Greek world, absorbing or driving out neighbouring non-Greek tribes, primarily Thracian and Illyrian.[2][3] They spoke Ancient Macedonian, a language closely related to Ancient Greek, perhaps a dialect, although the prestige language of the region was at first Attic and then Koine Greek.[4] Their religious beliefs mirrored those of other Greeks, following the main deities of the Greek pantheon, although the Macedonians continued Archaic burial practices that had ceased in other parts of Greece after the 6th century BC. Aside from the monarchy, the core of Macedonian society was its nobility. Similar to the aristocracy of neighboring Thessaly, their wealth was largely built on herding horses and cattle. Although composed of various clans, the kingdom of Macedonia, established around the 8th century BC, is mostly associated with the Argead dynasty and the tribe named after it. The dynasty was allegedly founded by Perdiccas I, descendant of the legendary Temenus of Argos, while the region of Macedon perhaps derived its name from Makedon, a figure of Greek mythology.
    [Show full text]
  • Stamatis Restaurant the Greek Experience Miles Away from Home
    The National Herald a b MAY 28, 2011 www.thenationalherald.com 2 100 Best Greek Restaurants THE NATIONAL HERALD, MAY 28, 2011 ARIZONA third in the works for Santa The National Herald Barbara. 451 Manhattan Beach Blvd A weekly publication of the ATHENA Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 NATIONAL HERALD, INC. (ΕΘΝΙΚΟΣ ΚΗΡΥΞ), Spacious, with Greek columns, (310) 545-4100 reporting the news and addressing the issues of paramount interest to the it opened in August 2010. Only www.petrosrestaurant.com Greek American community of the United States of America. Authentic Greek is on the Entrees: $23-$36 menu says co-owner Petros Publisher-Editor Kompouras, who arrived via SOFI GREEK RESTAURANT Antonis H. Diamataris Chicago from Meteora. Chefs Salonika Shrimp and Assistant to Publisher, Advertising are Charles Bowman and Peter Kotopoulo Riganato are a few Veta H. Diamataris Papadopoulos Lagios. Lamb chops and whole of the options at this restaurant Special Section Editor grilled sea bass are popular. with both indoors and an Angelike Contis 7000 E Mayo Blvd #26, outdoors Mediterranean-esque Production Manager Phoenix, AZ 85054 patio garden. Chrysoula Karametros (480) 502-4466 8030 3/4 West 3rd. Street www.athenagreekcuisine.com Los Angeles, CA 90048 37-10 30th Street, LIC, NY 11101-2614 Entrees: $15-$30 (323) 651-0346 Tel: (718)784-5255, Fax: (718)472-0510, Athena in Phoenix,Arizona www.sofisrestaurant.com e-mail: [email protected] ATHENS ON 4TH Entrees: $21-$39 named after founder Petros Entrees: $17-$40 Democritou 1 and Academias Sts, Athens, 10671, Greece Distinctions include an AAA 3 Benekos, who was raised in Tel: 011.30.210.3614.598, Fax: 011.30.210.3643.776, e-mail: Diamond Award and 67th Best LE PETIT GREEK ESTIATORIO Athens and Europe, learning ULYSSES VOYAGE [email protected] Restaurant in the United States Tom and Dimitri Houndalas his mother and grandmother’s The only Greek restaurant (City Magazine).
    [Show full text]
  • Sophocles in His Theatre
    Sophocles in his theatre Autor(en): Taplin, Oliver Objekttyp: Article Zeitschrift: Entretiens sur l'Antiquité classique Band (Jahr): 29 (1983) PDF erstellt am: 08.10.2021 Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-660771 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich sind. Ein Dienst der ETH-Bibliothek ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092 Zürich, Schweiz, www.library.ethz.ch http://www.e-periodica.ch V Oliver Taplin SOPHOCLES IN HIS THEATRE I shall conclude with some big questions about the end of OT: I start with a small one about the beginning of the play. In Sophocles' original production was Oedipus presented as lame; was he "majestic but for his tell-tale limp"?i The question gambols in the wake of Jean-Pierre Vernant's new and characteristically brilliant essay on "Lameness, Tyranny, Incest in Legend and History" 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Maria Callas and Alexis Minotis – Part I an Engaging Collaboration for a Norma and Medea in Greek Style
    Maria Callas and Alexis Minotis – Part I An engaging collaboration for a Norma and Medea in Greek style Introduction a German-educated stage director who Primadonna assoluta Maria Callas (1923- John C. Bastias had attended the Reinhardt Seminar and 1977) and actor and stage director Alexis become an assistant to Germany’s great- Minotis (1898 or 1900-1990), whose age est interwar director, Max Reinhardt, at placed them one generation apart, both ides. It must indeed be many years since a the Salzburg Festival and the Deutsches delved with great enthusiasm and perse- singer has given so compelling a dramatic Theater in Berlin. Reinhardt was experi- verance into the past of their respective performance”.[1] menting with ancient Greek tragedies theatrical fields. Cretan-born Minotis’ presented in circuses, because they were contribution to the revival of ancient 1. Alexis Minotis and the revival of an- the closest theatrical architectural forms Greek tragedy in the thirties, first as an cient Greek tragedy at the National to their open-air ancient Greek counter- actor and later as a stage director, left its (Royal) Theatre of Greece parts, instead of the closed Italianate Eu- mark indelibly inscribed ropean theatres. in this archetypical theat- It was Politis and Ron- rical art form, while Cal- diris who were responsible las’ contribution to the bel for the revival of ancient canto revival of the fifties Greek tragedy, creating is considered the most what came to be called important element in the “the tradition of the Na- restoration of this early 19th tional Theatre of Greece”. A century musical art form.
    [Show full text]
  • The Author of the Greek Original of the 'Poenulus
    252 T. 'A. D 0 r e y: The elections oE 216 B~C. Aemilius's dying message to'Fabius, stories, which need not·be tota]ly rejected as apocryphaI 12), but alsoby the family con- riection with t:heFabii established by his son. " If this is so, the election of Aemilius Paulus will represent a compromise between tbe Scipionicgroup and the Fabii, under which Fabius withdrewhis threat to invalidate the elections in ,return for the' election of one consul' wno, though a leading member of the Scipionic group, was personally acceptable to hirn. Birmingham T. A. Dorer THE AUTHOR OF THE GREEK ORIGINAL OF THE 'POENULUS ".: - . '" .. , Adequate analysis ofall the theories thathave, like barnacles, attached themselves to that',rather poor Plautine play, the Poenulus; woul<! require a volume of gargantuan size. The aim of this essay is modest:" to track down finallythe atithor of the Greek original used by Plautus as, his main source; con­ seqUently the larger questions, dealing with the methods of Plautus in adapting his Greek originals, will here be cOrisidered only insofar as they become relevant to mymain thesis. This 'is, that Alexis' 'Karchedonios' lies behind Plautus' play; the theoryhaspreviously been propounded byBergk1) andothers, • a,nd it is ön the foundation of theirpositive if uncertain argu- ' ments thatI desire to build here: It' is hoped that the resulting edifice will then be able to stand firm and stormproOf. ', Dietze first rested this theory ona firm fö~ndation, when he pointed out in a dissertation 2) that the one remaining frag- , men,t ofAlexis' 'Karchedonios'(Kock,.CAF II 331, 100): ßax'Yj• Aoe; , Er, appears to be translated at PoerlUlus 1318: Nam te, " , ,',' 12) The' story oE the death oE Aemilius 'in LivyXXII.
    [Show full text]
  • The Opening of Plutarch's Life of Themistokles
    The Opening of Plutarch’s Life of Themistokles Timothy E. Duff HE OPENING CHAPTERS of many Plutarchan Lives deal with a fairly standard set of subjects, such as family, T appearance, education, or character,1 and the Life of Themistokles is no exception; its first chapter contains material relating to Themistokles’ family and parentage. Scholarly at- tention on the opening of the Themistokles has generally focused on the historical accuracy and origins of the details Plutarch records. The focus of this paper, however, is on the logic of the selection and organisation of this material, and the way in which it is integrated into the Life of Themistokles as a whole. I shall attempt to demonstrate that Plutarch’s discussion of Themistokles’ family in Them. 1 plays an important “proemial” role within the Life in which it is placed: it introduces themes and images which will be of importance throughout the Life, and implicitly reveals character-traits of the subject which will be developed later.2 1. Themistokles’ parentage As it stands in our manuscripts,3 the Life of Themistokles begins, as do so many Lives, with a discussion of ancestry (1.1–4). Themistokles’ father was not very conspicuous, Plutarch tells 1 F. Leo, Die griechisch-römische Biographie nach ihrer litterarischen Form (Leipzig 1901) 180–182. 2 P. A. Stadter, “The Proems of Plutarch’s Lives,” ICS 13 (1988) 275–295, at 288, briefly notes the “proemial function” of the opening of the Them., but sees it in terms of arousing the reader’s interest and establishing good will towards the author through the citation of sources.
    [Show full text]