DOCSLIB.ORG

Sociology 1 Introduction to Sociology Spring 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sociology 1 Introduction to Sociology Spring 2016 Sociology 1 Introduction to Sociology Spring 2016 Instructor: Erika J. Gutierrez E-mail: [email protected] Lecture Time: Tu/Th 8:00 am – 9:25 am Office Phone: (310) 233-4698, Box 4962 Lecture Location: NEA 118 Office: NEA 153 Section Number: 0132 Office Hours: Tu/Th 7:25 am – 7:55 am Course Description This course is designed to introduce students to the sociological perspective and the basic vocabulary of this field. Students will learn how sociologists scientifically investigate people in groups, which will enhance the students’ understanding of people’s behavior in social settings. Lectures and readings will give special attention to the social processes that stratify society by race, class, sexual orientation, religion, and gender. In addition, this class will also focus on the impacts that globalization has had on both traditional and emergent institutions. Required Textbook Sociology 11th edition, 2013 (ISBN10: 1-111-82957-8) by Jon Shepard. Thomson Wadsworth Publishing. ** Having the book is mandatory and necessary for successful completion of the course. ** Additional readings as necessary. Attendance and E-mail Your active participation in lecture is a vital part of this course since it will allow me to assess your level of understanding and it will also provide me the opportunity to gauge your improvement. Therefore, attendance is mandatory and roll will be taken daily. IT IS THE STUDENT’S RESPONSIBILITY TO DROP THIS CLASS. However, the instructor reserves the right to drop students for excessive absences and tardiness or as needed. Students that do not attend class on the first day will be dropped. The last day to withdraw and receive a “W” is 5/5/2016 in-person and 5/8/2016 online. In order to receive additional class materials, all students must use and check their LAHC issued student e-mail account. Should a student not receive e-mailed class materials, it is the student's responsibility to e-mail the instructor for the missing materials. If any e-mail issues should arise, please notify the instructor immediately. Graded Assignments and Exams 1. Examinations: There are four multiple-choice and short answer exams. The student should bring on each test day a #2 pencil, an eraser, and a green scantron (Form No. 882-E). Some of the exam questions will be modeled after the Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) – please refer the section on SLOs. 2. Homework Assignments: There will be an article review and a response paper both 2 full pages TYPED that must be submitted in CLASS. The prompts and the supplemental readings and/or related media needed for these assignments will be sent to your student e-mail. 3. Breaching Experiment: This is a two person group project in which you both will have to breach a norm and then write a paper, as well as, present your findings. Further information regarding this project and presentation will be sent via e-mail. 4. Quizzes: There will be FOUR in-class quizzes and these cannot be made up. 5. Participation: Participation points include class discussions to response questions, group work, and/or attendance points; these CANNOT be made up (NO exceptions). 6. Grade Sheet: You must keep track of all your scores on your own grade sheet. The purpose of this grade sheet is for your own knowledge of your grade in this class and to comply with FERPA. 7. Extra Credit: The instructor may provide extra credit assignments as the semester progresses. 1 Grading Basis The letter grade for this class is based on the following point system for the assignments: Examinations (4 x 85 points) 340 points Breaching Experiment (1 x 60 points) 60 points Homework Assignments (2 x 30 points) 60 points Quizzes (4 x 5 points) 20 points Participation (4 x 5 points) 20 points Grade Sheet (1 x 5 points) +/5 points Points Possible 500 points total A 500 to 450 points (100-90%) B 449 to 400 points (89-80%) C 399 to 350 points (79-70%) D 349 to 300 points (69-60%) F 299 to 0 points (59-0%) Note: Plagiarism and cheating will not be tolerated. Any acts of academic dishonesty will result in the following consequences: students will receive a zero for the assignment. The act will be reported to the Dean and a disciplinary record will be established to track any additional incidents of cheating/plagiarism. Students may be subjected to further consequences. For more information on what constitutes cheating and plagiarism, please visit LAHC’s Academic Policy page and review 9803.28 Academic Dishonesty. LAHC Sociology Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) The Student Learning Outcomes will be measured and assessed by examinations and written work assigned. Upon successful completion of this course the student will be able to: 1. The student will be able to apply the sociological imagination to his or her life. 2. The student will be able to compare and contrast the three major schools of sociology and their specific theories to social life. 3. The student will be able to describe how their status in social structures affects them as individuals, their behavior, and their life chances. 4. The student will be able to define and discuss the various forms of differentiation. 5. The student will able to describe the use of sociological research methods. Special Accommodations, Makeup Exams, and Late Assignment Policy I. Please let me know if you need special exam and/or lecture accommodations. If you are a student with a disability, please notify me of your status so that I may be able to provide you with all reasonable accommodations. A form from Special Programs and Services (SP&S) may be required. II. Students with medical and/or legal documentation may take a make up exam. All make up examinations must be completed within FIVE DAYS from the original date of the missed exam unless extenuating circumstances are present. It is the responsibility of the student to e-mail the instructor to schedule a make up exam. No make up exams will be provided to students who do not have legitimate documentation for missing the exam. III. Late homework assignments will only be accepted if students have medical and/or legal documentation. If a student does not have any medical and/or legal documentation, then your assignments will not be accepted if they are late nor can they be submitted for partial credit. A late breaching experiment can only be turned in late if both partners have documentation. IV. Participation, quizzes, breaching experiment presentation, and any extra credit opportunities cannot be submitted late or made up under any circumstance. V. Should a student request an assignment to be regraded, the student must provide in writing (minimum one page, typed) a detailed reason for this request no later than FIVE DAYS after the original graded item has been returned to the student. Both the written request and the original graded assignment must be handed to the instructor together with the understanding that the score for the assignment being reviewed may not change. Los Angeles Harbor College Mission Statement Los Angeles Harbor College promotes access and student success through associate and transfer degrees, certificates, economic and workforce development, and basic skills instruction. Our educational programs and support services meet the needs of diverse communities as measured by campus institutional learning outcomes. Class Courtesy Before lecture begins, turn off and put away mobile/cell phones. Should you choose to take notes on a tablet or laptop, be aware that you may be asked to leave this device at home if it becomes a distraction for our class. Also, do not engage in private conversations during lecture. Please note that some of the concepts and ideas that we discuss in lecture may be of a controversial nature. Therefore, I ask everyone to keep an open mind and that we respect all opinions shared in our class. 2 Important Dates (Exam dates are fixed. Students may request to change the date of their exam ONLY under an emergency basis.) Quiz 1: 3/3/16 Exam 1: 3/8/16 Participation 1: 2/16/16 Homework Assignment 1: 3/17/16 Quiz 2: 3/22/16 Exam 2: 3/29/16 Participation 2: 3/24/16 Homework Assignment 2: 5/19/16 Quiz 3: 4/28/16 Exam 3: 5/3/16 Participation 3: 5/5/16 Breaching Experiment: 4/22/16 Quiz 4: 5/12/16 Exam 4: 5/31/16 Participation 4: 5/26/16 Grade Sheet: 5/26/16 Course Outline and Reading Schedule (The instructor reserves the right to modify this schedule as needed.) Week 1 (2/9 & 2/11): Syllabus and Introduction The Sociological Perspective Chapter 1 Week 2 (2/16 & 2/18): Participation 1 – Photographs The Sociological Perspective Chapter 1 – continued Social Research Chapter 2 Week 3 (2/23 & 2/25): Culture Chapter 3 Extra Credit Opportunity 1 – Plagiarism Quiz http://library.acadiau.ca/tutorials/plagiarism/ Week 4 (3/1 & 3/3): Socialization Chapter 4 Quiz 1 (Chapter 4) Week 5 (3/8 & 3/10): Exam 1 (Chapters 1-4) Social Structure and Society Chapter 5 Week 6 (3/15 & 3/17): Groups and Organizations Chapter 6 Homework Assignment 1 Due – Article Review Week 7 (3/22 & 3/24): Deviance and Social Control Chapter 7 Quiz 2 (Chapter 7) Social Stratification Chapter 8 Participation 2 – Breaching Experiment Proposal Week 8 (3/29 & 3/31): Exam 2 (Chapters 5-8) No Class – Cesar Chavez Holiday Week 9 (4/2 – 4/8): SPRING BREAK Week 10 (4/12 & 4/14): Inequalities of Race and Ethnicity Chapter 9 Inequalities of Gender Chapter 10 Extra Credit Opportunity 2 – BSRI Week 11 (4/19 & 4/22): Family Chapter 11 Breaching Experiment Presentations Breaching Experiment is Due Week 12 (4/26 & 4/28): Education Chapter 12 Quiz 3 (Chapter 12) Week 13
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Trust and Sustainable Agriculture: the Construction and Application of an Integrative Theory Michael Stanley Carolan Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2002 Trust and sustainable agriculture: the construction and application of an integrative theory Michael Stanley Carolan Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Carolan, Michael Stanley, "Trust and sustainable agriculture: the construction and application of an integrative theory " (2002). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 502. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/502 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • KRUPNICK-DISSERTATION-2016.Pdf (1.542Mb)
    I Go, You Go: Searching for Strength and Self in the American Gym The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Krupnick, Joseph Carney. 2016. I Go, You Go: Searching for Strength and Self in the American Gym. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33493523 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA I Go, You Go: Searching for Strength and Self in the American Gym A Dissertation Presented by Joseph Carney Krupnick to The Department of Sociology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Sociology Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts April 2016 © 2016 Joseph Carney Krupnick Professor Christopher Winship Joseph Carney Krupnick I Go, You Go: Searching for Strength and Self in the American Gym Abstract This ethnography is based on 48 months of detailed participation, interviews, and observation with active gymgoers at three middle-class gyms in Chicago. It is a study of a particular social institution that, despite its explosion onto the mainstream cultural scene, has surprisingly eluded social-scientific inquiry. Demographically, the group that has been most caught up in the fitness movement are young, single, college-educated Americans living in large city centers. As a study of a particular social world, this research will examine the localized social world of the gym and its young male members, focusing on how their interactions get patterned into negotiated order.
    [Show full text]
  • Quasi-Design: Breaching Presentations in Academia
    Quasi-design: Breaching presentations in academia Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Goldsmiths, University of London, Department of Design Tim Miller 2021 1 Declaration I hereby declare that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is clearly stated. Tim Miller 2 Acknowledgements I would first like to thank Dr. Alex Wilkie and Dr. Michael Guggenheim, the two people who supervised this thesis and with whom the journey of this research was undertaken. It has, for many reasons, been a pleasure working with you and I have learnt a great deal from you during this time. I also would like to thank the Department of Design and the Centre for Invention and Social Process (CISP) in the Department of Sociology at Goldsmiths for supporting this work – and the Arts and Humanities Research Council’s (AHRC) Design Star Centre for Doctoral Training for funding a large portion of it. Due to this opportunity, conversations have taken place with many other people including my transfer of registration examiners Dr. Tobie Kerridge and Dr. Nina Wakeford, and with Dr. Martin Tironi and Dr. Lucy Kimbell. There are, of course, those who kindly participated in this research: Dr. Bop; Dr. Carey; Dr. Dementia; Dr. Hip; Dr. Innovation; Dr. Interdisciplinary; Dr. Measurable; Dr. Medieval; Dr. Space-age; Dr. Tech. I’d also like to thank Alastair Jones, Marta Puchala and Adam Wright for applying their interaction and graphic design and web development skills to the project’s website. I’d like to extend my thanks to my numerous doctoral peers in and around “number thirteen” and my other colleagues in the design departments at Goldsmiths and the University of the Arts.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 'It Can't Be a Lie': the Wire As Breaching Experiment Joshua
    1 ‘It Can’t Be a Lie’: The Wire as Breaching Experiment Joshua Page & Joe Soss University of Minnesota The Politics of HBOs’ The Wire: Everything is Connected (2015), Eds. Shirin Deylami and Jonathan Havercroft. New York: Routledge, Ch.1, pp. 11-40. The five seasons of The Wire are widely recognized as a landmark event in the history of media efforts to portray life in America’s poor, racially segregated communities. The show was especially momentous for scholars, such as us, who study urban poverty and the various ways authorities work to manage its problems and populations. Here, finally, was a dramatic depiction of the world we knew through our research and tried to convey in our teaching and public engagement. Here, finally, was a nuanced, humane account of the lives and lived realities—of cops and drug dealers and teachers and addicts and students and parents and more—that intersect and shape one another in the most marginalized neighborhoods of our nation’s cities. Here, finally, was a wildly popular, critically acclaimed, nationally televised cry of dissent from the “thriving cultural industry of fear of the poor, led by such television programs as ‘America’s Most Wanted’ and ‘Cops.’”1 More even than most documentaries, The Wire offers a realistic depiction of life inside the “hyperghetto,” a social space defined by stark racial segregation, severely diminished jobs and social services, inadequate schools, rampant poverty, open-air drug markets, widespread housing foreclosures, and pervasive depression and dilapidation.2 From the show’s inception, 1 Loïc Wacquant, Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity (Durham: Duke University Press, 2009) 131-32.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download New Directions in Public Opinion 1St Edition
    NEW DIRECTIONS IN PUBLIC OPINION 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Adam J Berinsky | 9780415885294 | | | | | New Directions in Public Opinion 1st edition PDF Book Allison, G. They are the building blocks of agendas. In some cultures, women's "perception of language, not public opinion, forces them to remain quiet. Product details Format Paperback pages Dimensions x x Whoever desires to grasp and define the concept of public opinion will recognize quickly that he is dealing with a Proteus , a being that appears simultaneously in a thousand guises, both visible and as a phantom, impotent and surprisingly efficacious, which presents itself in innumerable transformations and is forever slipping through our fingers just as we believe we have a firm grip on it Milton Keynes: Open University Press. Raymond J. Scholars became more alert to the way in the policy agenda is constituted by new ideas and arguments, such as a new concept about the environment, or new evidence about the harm of certain human behaviours, such as tobacco use, from which rapid shifts in policy can result. The renaissance of political economy Economics and politics have cross-fertilized more strongly in recent years. Conversely, when individuals perceive that their opinion is less popular or losing popularity, they are less likely to voice it in public. The first was the classic period of studies of decision-making and rationality; the second was the age of synthesis when theories of decision-making were blended into accounts of agenda setting. The making of economic policy. Hence, the expansion of methods is difference-in- differences, regression discontinuity design, interrupted time series and propensity score matching as well as the analysis of randomized controlled trials Angrist and Pischke Individuals claimed that they were more likely to voice their opinions to non-Basques, suggesting that they have a "fear of isolation" in regards to fellow Basques.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Presented at the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Paper presented at the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, BC, Canada Using Cases as Triggers for Teachers’ Thinking about Practice: A Comparison of Responses to Animations and Videos Patricio Herbst1 Karl W. Kosko University of Michigan University of Michigan Abstract This study compared conversations among groups of teachers of high school geometry that had been triggered by either a video or an animation representation of instruction and managed with an open-ended agenda. All triggers represented scenarios that departed from what was hypothesized as normative. We used as the dependent variable the proportion of modal statements about instructional practice made by a group, which we argue is a good quantitative indicator that the statement appeals to the group’s knowledge of the norms of practice. Animations and videos produced similar proportion of modal statements, but the types of modal statements differed—with animations being associated with more statements of probability and obligation and videos being associated with more statements of inclination. 1 The work reported here has been supported in part by National Science Foundation grants REC-0133619, ESI-0353285, and DRL-0918425 to the first author. All opinions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Foundation. The authors acknowledge the assistance of Annick Rougee in coding the data. Introduction This paper is concerned with a methodological question in research on teaching: How can we access teaching knowledge that can be tacit in nature? Our purpose here is to contribute to validate the technique of utilizing open-ended agendas for group discussions of cartoon-based classroom scenarios, by benchmarking those against the more common use of videotaped episodes.
    [Show full text]
  • Detrivialization As a Strategy to Challenge Organizational Groupthink
    Detrivialization as a Strategy to Challenge Organizational Groupthink Salaheddine Mnasri and Stavros Papakonstantinidis The American University of the Middle East [email protected] [email protected] DOI: 10.34190/EJKM.18.03.003 Abstract: This paper aims to contribute to the literature on knowledge construction and knowledge sharing within the field of organizational communication. The research underlines the importance of exploring human learning contextually, descriptively, interpretively, and inductively. Through a participant-observer methodological approach, the study contributes to the literature by introducing detrivialization as a strategy to explore ’participants’ rhetoric related to their organizational procedures. The paper describes a case study that took place for 18 months in a cancer research lab in Belgium, where employees seemed unable to question several taken-for-granted practices. The present research primarily reveals the consequences of trivialization, when the rationale of essential organizational practices go unnoticed until observer- participant challenges the status quo. Also, the study highlights the outcomes of the detrivialization approach, which triggers unprecedented knowledge. Finally, the paper introduces the (de)trivialization dynamic model, which can depict the consequences of opening black-boxes in organizational contexts. This research is a new approach in organizational ethnomethodology, revisiting ’Garfinkel’s (1967) breaching experiment to describe science in action. The suggested model offers a methodological approach for exploring trivialized organizational dynamics and challenging groupthink. Detrivialization is an opposite approach to trivialization, to offer a new debate topic to scholars aiming to conduct ethnographic research and discourse analysis in organizational communication. Keywords: Detrivialization, knowledge construction, knowledge sharing, groupthink, discourse analysis, organizational culture, organizational communication.
    [Show full text]
  • Moral Reasoning and Decision Making 2017
    Moral reasoning and decision making 2017 Course Organiser: Dr. Matteo Colombo Email: [email protected] Office: D 236 Website: https://mteocolphi.wordpress.com/ Course Description Why do we tip at restaurants, but never at shoe shops? Why do we find repugnant to have sex with siblings? Why don’t people wear shorts when they get married? Why do we get angry if somebody jumps a queue? Why is it more likely that people throw an empty can of coke on the street when the street is already dirty? Why, when we get up in the morning, don’t we even consider to be nudist for the day? Why did women and children aboard the Titanic were more likely to survive than males? What if a person had no social contact during the first years of her life? In this course we shall explore these types of questions by intermingling philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience. Our focus will be on the psychological and philosophical foundations of judgement and decision-making in the moral/social domain. Background Prior familiarity with the material discussed during the course is not assumed. However, students will benefit from having the following background: (1) A previous philosophy course with a substantial ethics component. (2) A previous philosophy course with a substantial component in philosophy of science. (3) At least one course in psychology or a related human science. Learning Goals Upon successful completion of the course, you will be able: 1) To summarize, explain and compare (using specific examples) the central theories and arguments in the field of contemporary moral psychology, in particular about the relationship between moral behaviour, expectations, judgement, emotion and reason; 2) To apply your understanding and insight about current theories of social norms (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 SOC496H1S: SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY University Of
    SOC496H1S: SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY University of Toronto Term: Spring 2015 – Lecture Date/Time: Tuesday, 1-3pm – Location: SS2101 INSTRUCTOR Geoff Wodtke Office: Room 394, 725 Spadina Avenue Office Hours: Tuesday 3:30-5:30pm or by appointment Email: [email protected] COURSE DESCRIPTION Social life hinges to a significant degree on perceptions and beliefs, fears and desires, and antipathies and affections. Social events can pass without notice, seem like a nuisance, or evoke the most intense reactions, convictions, and anxieties. This course explores questions that lie at the intersection of sociology and psychology. How and why do individuals identify themselves with different social groups? How do beliefs, values, and norms shape social interactions? What institutions, events, and structures in turn influence beliefs, values, and norms? How do intergroup stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination develop and evolve? What engenders social conflict and aggression? We will explore how psychological theories can help explain a wide range of social phenomena, such as public opinion, stereotyping and prejudice, domination and subordination, and social movements. At the same time, we will explore how power relations, material inequalities, institutions, and other social forces can help explain psychological phenomena like identity, perception, emotion, and decision making. PREREQUISITES The prerequisite to take this course is completion of a 300 level or higher SOC course. Students without this prerequisites will be removed at any time if discovered. COURSE EVALUATION This is a writing (and reading) intensive course. There are no conventional tests, and your overall grades will be based solely on the following four writing assignments: Short Reaction Essays: Due in class each week (starting January 13th) Each week, students will write a short reaction essay summarizing their thoughts about the assigned readings for that week.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms International 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor
    INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was pert of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociology Topics
    Year 13 Topics (1) In year 13 we teach the following topics over the course of the year. Each topic draws on prior learning from previous years and builds on understanding from the Year 12 programme of study. Each topic develops and deepens the Core knowledge that will underpin all areas of the curriculum at KS5 and onward into undergraduate courses. Topic Rationale Knowledge acquisition Key vocabulary Skills and enrichment Beliefs in Sociology of Defining and measuring belief. Substantive, exclusivist, functional, AO1: Demonstrate knowledge Society beliefs is a inclusivist, constructionist, attendance, and understanding of: relevant, affiliation, practice, Brierley • sociological theories, sensitive and concepts and evidence contemporary Functionalist view of the role of Biological analogy, value consensus, • sociological research methods topic area of religion. secondary socialisation, social study. integration, social solidarity, sacred, AO2: Apply sociological profane, totem, collective conscience, theories, concepts, evidence cognitive capacity, prevents anomie, and research methods to a conservative force, civil religion, range of issues vicarious religion, C.A.G.E, Durkheim, Parsons, Malinowski, Bellah, Davie AO3: Analyse and evaluate sociological theories, concepts, Marxist view of the role of religion. Capitalism, bourgeoisie, proletariat, evidence and research methods exploitation, ISA, ruling class ideology, in order to: false class consciousness, social • present arguments construction, omnipotent, omnipresent, • make judgements
    [Show full text]
  • Download Preprint
    APA Citation: 1 Rosenfeld, D. L., Balcetis, E., Bastian, B., Berkman, E. T., Bosson, J. K., Brannon, T. N., Burrow, A. L., Cameron, C. D., Chen, S., Cook, J. E., Crandall, C. S., Davidai, S., Dhont, K., Eastwick, P. W., Gaither, S. E., Gangestad, S. W., Gilovich, T., Gray, K., Haines, E. L., . Tomiyama, A. J. (in press). Psychological science in the wake of COVID-19: Social, methodological, and meta-scientific considerations. Perspectives on Psychological Science. Psychological Science in the Wake of COVID-19: Social, Methodological, and Meta-Scientific Considerations Daniel L. Rosenfeld1*, Emily Balcetis2, Brock Bastian3, Elliot T. Berkman4,5, Jennifer K. Bosson6, Tiffany N. Brannon1, Anthony L. Burrow7, C. Daryl Cameron8,9, Serena Chen10, Jonathan E. Cook8, Christian Crandall11, Shai Davidai12, Kristof Dhont13, Paul W. Eastwick14, Sarah E. Gaither15, Steven W. Gangestad16, Thomas Gilovich17, Kurt Gray18, Elizabeth L. Haines19, Martie G. Haselton1,20,21, Nick Haslam22, Gordon Hodson23, Michael A. Hogg24, Matthew J. Hornsey25, Yuen J. Huo1, Samantha Joel26, Frank J. Kachanoff18, Gordon Kraft- Todd27, Mark R. Leary15, Alison Ledgerwood14, Randy T. Lee17, Steve Loughnan28, Cara C. MacInnis29, Traci Mann30, Damian R. Murray31, Carolyn Parkinson1, Efrén O. Pérez1,32, Tom Pyszczynski33, Kaylin Ratner7, Hank Rothgerber34, James D. Rounds7, Mark Schaller35, Roxane Cohen Silver36,37,38, Barbara A. Spellman39, Nina Strohminger40,41, Janet K. Swim8, Felix Thoemmes7,17, Betul Urganci7, Joseph A. Vandello6, Sarah Volz30, Vivian Zayas17, & A. Janet
    [Show full text]