DOCSLIB.ORG

Missouri Code of State Regulations - 10 Csr 20-7.031) Within the Watershed Anaylsis Area of the Mark Twain National Forest

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Missouri Code of State Regulations - 10 Csr 20-7.031) Within the Watershed Anaylsis Area of the Mark Twain National Forest DESIGANTED WATERS OF THE STATE AND BENEFICAL USES (MISSOURI CODE OF STATE REGULATIONS - 10 CSR 20-7.031) WITHIN THE WATERSHED ANAYLSIS AREA OF THE MARK TWAIN NATIONAL FOREST Table 1a: Beneficial Uses of Streams and Lakes Cedar Creek Ranger District ............................................................................................................. 3 Table 1b: Designated Waters of the State Cedar Creek Ranger District ....................................................................................................................... 4 Table 2a: Beneficial Uses of Streams and Lakes Houston/Rolla Ranger District ......................................................................................................... 4 Table 2b: Designated Waters of the State Houston/Rolla Ranger District .................................................................................................................... 8 Table 3a: Beneficial Uses of Streams and Lakes Salem and Potosi Ranger Districts ................................................................................................. 11 Table 3b: Designated Waters of the State Salem and Potosi Ranger Districts ............................................................................................................ 17 Table 4a: Beneficial Uses of Streams and Lakes Fredericktown Ranger District ....................................................................................................... 23 Table 4b: Designated Waters of the State Frederick Town Ranger District ................................................................................................................ 27 Table 5a: Beneficial Uses of Streams and Lakes Cassville Ranger District ................................................................................................................ 29 Table 5b: Designated Waters of the State Cassville Ranger District ........................................................................................................................... 31 Table 6a: Beneficial Uses of Streams and Lakes Ava Ranger District ........................................................................................................................ 33 Table 6b: Designated Waters of the State Ava Ranger District ................................................................................................................................... 36 Table 7a: Beneficial Uses of Streams and Lakes Willow Springs Ranger District .................................................................................................... 39 Table 7b: Designated Waters of the State Willow Springs Ranger District ................................................................................................................ 41 Table 8a: Beneficial Uses of Streams and Lakes Eleven Point Ranger District .......................................................................................................... 44 Table 8b: Designated Waters of the State Eleven Point Ranger District ..................................................................................................................... 49 Table 9a: Beneficial Uses of Streams and Lakes Popular Bluff Ranger District ......................................................................................................... 54 Table 9b: Designated Waters of the State Popular Bluff Ranger District .................................................................................................................... 56 Data Sources ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 59 1 Acronyms in Tables AQL = Protection of Warm Water Aquatic Life and Human Health-Fish Consumption - Protection of aquatic life (General warm-water fishery) - Waters in which naturally occurring water quality and habitat conditions allow the maintenance of a wide variety of warm-water biota, including naturally reproducing populations of recreationally important fish species. CDF = Cold-Water Fishery - Waters in which naturally occurring water quality and habitat conditions allow the maintenance of a naturally reproducing or stocked trout fishery and other naturally reproducing populations of recreationally important fish species. CLF = Cool-Water Fishery - Waters in which naturally occurring water quality and habitat conditions allow the maintenance of a sensitive, high-quality sport fishery (including smallmouth bass and rock bass) and other naturally reproducing populations of recreationally important fish species. DWS = Drinking Water Supply - Maintenance of a raw water supply which will yield potable water after treatment by public water treatment facilities. IND = Industrial process water and industrial cooling water - Water to support various industrial uses. IRR = Irrigation - Application of water to cropland or directly to plants that may be used for human or livestock consumption. Occasional supplemental irrigation, rather than continuous irrigation, is assumed. LWW = Livestock & Wildlife Watering - Maintenance of conditions to support health in livestock and wildlife. SCR = Secondary Contact Recreation - Uses include fishing, wading, commercial and recreational boating, any limited contact incidental to shoreline activities, and activities in which users do not swim or float in the water. These recreational activities may result in contact with the water that is either incidental or accidental and the probability of ingesting appreciable quantities of water is minimal. WBC_A = Whole body contact recreation - Activities in which there is direct human contact with the raw surface water to the point of complete body submergence. The raw water may be ingested accidentally and certain sensitive body organs, such as the eyes, ears, and the nose, will be exposed to the water. Although the water may be ingested 2 accidentally, it is not intended to be used as a potable supply unless acceptable treatment is applied. Water so designated is intended to be used for swimming, water skiing, or skin diving. Category A applies to those water segments that have been established by the property owner as public swimming areas allowing full and free access by the public for swimming purposes and waters with existing whole body contact recreational use(s). WBC_B = Whole body contact recreation - Activities in which there is direct human contact with the raw surface water to the point of complete body submergence. The raw water may be ingested accidentally and certain sensitive body organs, such as the eyes, ears, and the nose, will be exposed to the water. Although the water may be ingested accidentally, it is not intended to be used as a potable supply unless acceptable treatment is applied. Water so designated is intended to be used for swimming, water skiing, or skin diving. Category B applies to waters designated for whole body contact recreation not contained within category A. Table 1a: Beneficial Uses of Streams and Lakes Cedar Creek Ranger District HUC-6 ID Watershed Name Counties Acres Beneficial Uses Streams and Lakes Number 103001021401 Prairie Fork-Middle Callaway 33,803 Prairie Fork (AQL, LWW, WBC_B); Middle River (AQL, LWW, WBC_B); River Prime Creek (AQL, LWW, WBC_B), Henke Lake (AQL, LWW, WBC_B); Paul Herring Lake ((AQL, LWW, WBC_B) 103001021004 Fowler Creek-Cedar Boone and 36,744 Big Bar Creek (AQL, LWW, WBC_B); Brushy Creek (AQL, LWW, WBC_B); Creek Callaway Cedar Creek (AQL, LWW, SCR, WBC_B); Conner Creek (AQL, LWW, WBC_B); Dry Fork (AQL, LWW, WBC_B); Fowler Creek (AQL, LWW, WBC_B); and Trib to Cedar Creek (AQL, LWW, WBC_B) 103001021402 Headwaters Hillers Callaway 25,748 Hillers Creek (AQL, LWW, WBC_B) Creek 103001021003 Millers Creek-Cedar Boone and 34,370 Cedar Creek (AQL, LWW, WBC_B); Millers Creek (LWW, WBC_B); Owl Creek Callaway Creek (AQL, LWW, WBC_B); Smith Creek (AQL, LWW, WBC_B); Little Dixie Lake (AQL, LWW, SCR, WBC_B 3 Table 1b: Designated Waters of the State Cedar Creek Ranger District Outstanding National Resource Outstanding State Resource Losing Stream Waters Waters Acres of Total Percent Percent Lakes Watershed Name Miles of Percent of of and Streams of Total Name Miles Total Name Miles Miles Total Ponds Stream Stream Stream Miles Miles Miles Prairie Fork-Middle 128.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,289.8 River Fowler Creek-Cedar 149.8 0 0 0 0 1.6 1.1% 329.3 Creek Headwaters Hillers 88.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 196.4 Creek Millers Creek-Cedar 142.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 472.8 Creek Table 2a: Beneficial Uses of Streams and Lakes Houston/Rolla Ranger District HUC-6 ID Watershed Name Counties Acres Beneficial Uses Streams and Lakes Number 102902020205 Anderson Creek-Big Texas 14,485 Big Piney River (AQL, CLF, DWS, IRR, LWW, SCR, WBC_A), Hazelton Piney River Spring (AQL, LWW, WBC_B), Roaring Springs (AQL, LWW, WBC_B), Rocky Branch (AQL, WBC_B), and Anderson Creek (AQL, LWW, WBC_B) 102902020402 Bald Ridge Creek- Phelps, 28,593 Big Piney River (AQL, CLF, DWS, IRR, LWW, SCR, WBC_A) and Bald Ridge Big Piney River Pulaski, Creek (AQL, LWW, WBC_A) and Texas 4 HUC-6 ID Watershed Name Counties Acres Beneficial Uses Streams and Lakes Number 102902020204 Big Paddy Creek Texas 19,782 Big Paddy Creek (AQL, LWW, WBC_B), Little Paddy Creek (AQL, LWW, WBC_B), and Roby Lake (AQL, LWW, SCR, WBC_A) 102902020404 Big Piney River Phelps and 32,930 Big Piney River (AQL, CLF, DWS, IRR, LWW, SCR, WBC_A) Pulaski 102902020203 Boone Creek-Big Texas 37,635
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Macroinvertebrate Assessment of Ozark Streams Located in Lead–Zinc Mining Areas of the Viburnum Trend in Southeastern Missouri, USA
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USGS Staff -- Published Research US Geological Survey 2010 A macroinvertebrate assessment of Ozark streams located in lead–zinc mining areas of the Viburnum Trend in southeastern Missouri, USA Barry Poulton U.S. Geological Survey, [email protected] Ann L. Allert U.S. Geological Survey, [email protected] John M. Besser U.S. Geological Survey, [email protected] Christopher J. Schmitt U.S. Geological Survey, [email protected] William G. Brumbaugh U.S. Geological Survey, [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub Poulton, Barry; Allert, Ann L.; Besser, John M.; Schmitt, Christopher J.; Brumbaugh, William G.; and Fairchild, James F., "A macroinvertebrate assessment of Ozark streams located in lead–zinc mining areas of the Viburnum Trend in southeastern Missouri, USA" (2010). USGS Staff -- Published Research. 561. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub/561 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Geological Survey at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USGS Staff -- Published Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Barry Poulton, Ann L. Allert, John M. Besser, Christopher J. Schmitt, William G. Brumbaugh, and James F. Fairchild This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ usgsstaffpub/561 Environ Monit Assess (2010) 163:619–641 DOI 10.1007/s10661-009-0864-2 A macroinvertebrate assessment of Ozark streams located in lead–zinc mining areas of the Viburnum Trend in southeastern Missouri, USA Barry C.
    [Show full text]
  • Meramec River Watershed Demonstration Project
    MERAMEC RIVER WATERSHED DEMONSTRATION PROJECT Funded by: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency prepared by: Todd J. Blanc Fisheries Biologist Missouri Department of Conservation Sullivan, Missouri and Mark Caldwell and Michelle Hawks Fisheries GIS Specialist and GIS Analyst Missouri Department of Conservation Columbia, Missouri November 1998 Contributors include: Andrew Austin, Ronald Burke, George Kromrey, Kevin Meneau, Michael Smith, John Stanovick, Richard Wehnes Reviewers and other contributors include: Sue Bruenderman, Kenda Flores, Marlyn Miller, Robert Pulliam, Lynn Schrader, William Turner, Kevin Richards, Matt Winston For additional information contact East Central Regional Fisheries Staff P.O. Box 248 Sullivan, MO 63080 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Project Overview The overall purpose of the Meramec River Watershed Demonstration Project is to bring together relevant information about the Meramec River basin and evaluate the status of the stream, watershed, and wetland resource base. The project has three primary objectives, which have been met. The objectives are: 1) Prepare an inventory of the Meramec River basin to provide background information about past and present conditions. 2) Facilitate the reduction of riparian wetland losses through identification of priority areas for protection and management. 3) Identify potential partners and programs to assist citizens in selecting approaches to the management of the Meramec River system. These objectives are dealt with in the following sections titled Inventory, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Analyses, and Action Plan. Inventory The Meramec River basin is located in east central Missouri in Crawford, Dent, Franklin, Iron, Jefferson, Phelps, Reynolds, St. Louis, Texas, and Washington counties. Found in the northeast corner of the Ozark Highlands, the Meramec River and its tributaries drain 2,149 square miles.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Study Area
    Description of the study Area Description: Description of the Study Area: The Big Piney Watershed is located in central Missouri and covers approximately 755 square miles in four counties. These counties include Texas, Howell, Phelps, and Pulaski Counties (see Big Piney- map.pdf). Most of the watershed (74%) lies within Texas County, while Pulaski, Phelps, and Howell Counties contain 14%, 12%, and less than 1% of the watershed respectively. The Big Piney Watershed is bounded on the west, north and a portion of the east side by the remainder of the Gasconade Basin. The Meramec, Current, and Jacks Fork Watersheds bound the Big Piney on the remainder of the East side, while the North Fork watershed lies on its southern boundary. The Big Piney Watershed has 5 cities and towns within or partially within its boundary. They include Cabool, Houston, Licking, Raymondville, and St. Robert. The Big Piney's land cover use is described in the Big Piney Land cover use.pdf. The majority of the Big Piney is fores, with grassland being a distant second as far as land use/cover type. The Big Piney River begins as a first order stream approximately 4 miles northwest of Cabool, Missouri. From its beginnings, the stream flows in a southeasterly direction for approximately 4 miles before entering the city of Cabool, Missouri. It then continues in a southeasterly direction for 2 miles before turning northeast and following the outskirts of Cabool for an additional 2 miles. From Cabool, the river continues in a northeasterly direction for 35 miles before turning to the North, Northeast.
    [Show full text]
  • William Devol Dobkins Photograph Collection (R1279)
    William Devol Dobkins Photograph Collection (R1279) Collection Number: R1279 Collection Title: William Devol Dobkins Photograph Collection Dates: circa 1892-1968, bulk circa 1892-1920 Creator: Dobkins, William Devol, 1879-1968 Abstract: The William Devol Dobkins Photograph Collection contains ninety-two photographs, consisting primarily of contact prints from the original glass-plate negatives. Of these, at least eighty are attributed to William “Will” Devol Dobkins. The majority of these images were shot between 1892 and 1920. They show outdoor views of life in and around Crawford County, Missouri. Collection Size: 0.5 cubic foot (6 folders, 92 photographs) Language: Collection materials are in English. Repository: The State Historical Society of Missouri Restrictions on Access: Collection is open for research. This collection is available at The State Historical Society of Missouri Research Center-Rolla. If you would like more information, please contact us at [email protected]. Collections may be viewed at any research center. Restrictions on Use: The Donor has given and assigned to the Society all rights of copyright, which the Donor has in the Materials and in such of the Donor’s works as may be found among any collections of Materials received by the University from others. Preferred Citation: [Specific item; box number; folder number] William Devol Dobkins Photograph Collection (R1279); The State Historical Society of Missouri Research Center-Rolla [after first mention may be abbreviated to SHSMO-Rolla]. Donor Information: The photographs were loaned for copying to the State Historical Society of Missouri by J.L. Dobkins on December 1, 1992 (Accession No. RA0555). An addition was loaned on December 15, 2010 by Beth Dobkins Garrison (Accession No.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Distribution, Geochemistry, and Storage of Mining Sediment In
    STATEMENT OF WORK Spatial distribution, geochemistry, and storage of mining sediment in channel and floodplain deposits of streams draining the Viburnum Trend Mining District of Southeast Missouri, USA Prepared by: Dr. Robert T. Pavlowsky, Ph.D., Principle Investigator Ozarks Environmental and Water Resources Institute Missouri State University 901 South National Avenue Springfield, MO 65897 [email protected] Co‐Principle Investigators Dr. Scott Lecce, Ph.D., East Carolina University Marc R. Owen, M.S., Ozarks Environmental and Water Resources Institute Submitted to: John Weber U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 101 Park DeVille, Suite A Columbia, MO 65203 573‐234‐2132 x 177 [email protected] July 16, 2012 1 INTRODUCTION The New Lead Belt in southeastern Missouri has been a major producer of lead (Pb) and other metals since 1960 when the first mine opened in Viburnum, Missouri (Seeger, 2008). To date, 10 mines have operated along a north‐south line extending for almost 100 kilometers (km) from from Viburnum to south of Bunker, Missouri. This subdistrict of the Southeast Missouri Lead Mining District is referred to as the Viburnum Trend (VT). Seven mines are presently in operation in the VT: (i) Viburnum #29 Mine in Washington County which uses the Buick Mill; (ii) Casteel or Viburnum #35 Mine in Iron County which uses the Buick and Brushy Creek Mills; (iii) Buick Mine and Mill in Iron and Reynolds Counties; (iv) Fletcher Mine and Mill in Reynolds County which sometimes uses the Brushy Creek Mill; (v) Brushy Creek mine and mill in Reynolds County; (vi) West Fork Mine and Mill in Reynolds County; and (vii) Sweetwater Mine and Mill in Reynolds County (Seeger, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Stream Teams Unite to Protect
    Big County Piney River, Texas By Peter Maki, Stream 4623 Team September – October 2012 4654 Stream Teams Information for and about Missouri Stream Teams Strong! INSIDE Stream Teams Unite to Protect THIS ISSUE Big Piney River 2 Stream Team Awards By Susan Higgins, DNR VWQM Coordinator Monitoring Minutes: n May 24th, after several false starts, the Equipment Reorder & Return Big Piney Watershed Committee finally Level 1 VWQM Ocame together to start a Stream Team Workshops Scheduled Association, adopting the name Big Piney River Stream Team Watershed Association. Peter Team Snapshots Maki (Stream Team 4623) of Top of the Ozarks 3 Riffle Review The Houston Scouts – ready to get some garbage! Resource Conservation & Development, Inc. has Team Calendar been serving as meeting facilitator since January well as free shuttle service and the use of 20 4 Teams in Action and is very happy with the success they have had canoes for the river cleanup. getting organized. All in all, the volunteers covered 18.6 miles Activity Report 5 They got off to a great start with a of river and brought in 55 tires, 215 pounds of Osuccessful Big Piney River Cleanup on June scrap metal, and 1,466 pounds of trash. Adding 7 Activity Prize Winners 23rd, organized by Debbie Miller from the Kabul to the total pulled from the river were things Things You Find When Waterdogs (Stream Team 3419). The Boiling like chairs, carpet, a burn barrel, and a car the Water Goes Down Springs Access was the starting point for the trunk lid. Of the tires retrieved, five were large Reminder: Stream Team cleanup and they registered 72 volunteers on site.
    [Show full text]
  • IN OLD PULASKI Momentum
    Old Settlers Gazette 2012 - Page 6 he Pulaski County news of one hundred years ago reveals a feeling of good times in our central Ozarks. There was general Tprosperity and businesses in our of towns and villages were making im- provements and expanding. Fencing in stock and drinking alcoholic bever- News 1912 ages were still controversial issues. Agitation for better roads was gaining IN OLD PULASKI momentum. he newspapers had a network Overall, 1912 was a progressive year. of community correspon- Although Theodore Roosevelt’s term dents. Each correspondent re- as President was over in March of ported who was sick, who visited 1909, his Progressive Movement lead- whom, who sold what, and what ership had imbued the country with T was being built. This type of news his energetic spirit. TR apparently accounted for about 90 per cent of missed the challenges of the office as the local news ink. We have gener- he made a run for a third term in this ally omitted the sick call and the vis- election year. Although the Pulaski County Democ- itation reports. The larger railroad rat is our most often used source to towns (Dixon, Crocker, and Rich- give you a notion of life a century ago, land) usually reported each week. we also read papers from neighboring News from the smaller communi- counties. There a re items from the ties (e.g. Decker, Bailey, and Lebanon Rustic (Laclede), Licking News Hooker) was reported sporadically. and Houston Herald (Texas), and Rolla Some of these communities in Pu- Herald (Phelps). These counties are in laski County have lost their identity the area known as “Old Pulaski,” today for the general public (see when antebellum Pulaski included map at left).
    [Show full text]
  • 12Th Biennial Symposium
    12th Biennial Symposium April 12 – 14, 2021 Program and Abstracts 2 Table of Contents Meeting at a Glance 3 Definitions 4 Symposium Sponsors 5 2021 Virtual Symposium Local Committee 6 Acknowledgements 7 FMCS Standing Officers 7 FMCS Committees: Chairs, and Co-Chairs 8 Plenary Session 10 Networking Break Out Sessions 11 Oral and Poster Presentations Discussion Forum 12 Committee Meetings 13 Contributed Presentations (Titles and Authors) 14 Full Abstracts 42 FMCS Code of Conduct 152 Photo: Ryan Hagerty (USFWS) FMCS Virtual Symposium 2021 Back to the Future: The Virtual Unknown 3 Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society Virtual Symposium April 12 – 14, 2021 Back to the Future: The Virtual Unknown Meeting at a Glance Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Monday (12 April 2021) Tuesday (13 April 2021) Wednesday (14 April 2021) 8:00am: Symposium Web Page Opens 9:45am – 10:45am: Breakfast at FMCS 9:45am – 10:45am: Breakfast at FMCS Recorded Oral/Poster Presentations Visible Live Networking Sessions Live Networking Sessions 11:00am - 1:00pm: Board Meeting 10:45am - 11:00am: Coffee Break 10:45am - 11:00am: Coffee Break Live Session 11:00am - 12:00pm: Oral and Poster 11:00am - 12:00pm: Oral and Poster 1:00pm - 1:15pm: Coffee Break Presentations Discussion Forum 1 Presentations Discussion Forum 1 Live Sessions Live Sessions 1:15pm – 2:30pm: Welcome and Plenary Session Live Session 12:00am - 12:15m: Coffee Break 12:00am - 12:15m: Coffee Break 2:30pm - 2:45pm: Coffee Break 12:15pm - 2:00pm: Committee Meetings 1 12:15pm - 2:00pm: Committee Meetings 2 Live Sessions Live
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Missouri's Streams
    The State of Missouri’s Streams Summary of Invertebrate Data 1993-2010 The State of Missouri’s Streams Report summarizes water quality in Missouri’s streams and rivers using biological data collected by trained citizen volun- teers through the Missouri Stream Team Program. This report was assembled by the Missouri Stream Team Watershed Coalition with the goal of describ- ing water quality across Missouri, providing feed- back to volunteers and educating citizens. Acknowledgements The Missouri Stream Team Watershed Coalition also like to thank the staff of the Missouri Stream would like to thank Dan Obrecht and Tony Thor- Team Program at Missouri Department of Con- pe, University of Missouri Senior Research Asso- servation and Missouri Department of Natural ciates, for compilation and interpretation of the Resources for their guidance and assistance in Stream Team volunteer data and creation of this this process. Appreciation is also given to Stream report. Their expertise in working with volunteer Team volunteers who have dedicated their time to data was instrumental in creating a publication monitoring our states streams and playing an ac- that truly showcases volunteer efforts while de- tive role in protecting our state’s water resources. scribing water quality across the state. We would Pat Jones on right. Photo by Dave Marner A special thanks to Mrs. Pat Jones for providing funding for this publication. Mrs. Jones is a long- time supporter of the Missouri Stream Team Pro- gram. Pat and her late husband Ted have provided many conservation legacies that make Missouri better for its people and its natural resources. Table of Contents Introduction Invertebrates as Indicators of Water Quality 2 Description of the Data 2 Sources of Data Variation 3 Water Quality Assessments Statewide Water Quality 4 Regional Reports 5-16 Each regional report contains a select analysis using regional data.
    [Show full text]
  • Geohydrologic and Water-Quality Assessment of the Fort Leonard Wood Military Reservation, Missouri, 1994-95
    Geohydrologic and Water-Quality Assessment of the Fort Leonard Wood Military Reservation, Missouri, 1994-95 By Jeffrey L. Imes, John G. Schumacher, and Michael J. Kleeschulte_______________ U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4270 Prepared in cooperation with the DIRECTORATE OF PUBLIC WORKS, ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION, FORT LEONARD WOOD MILITARY RESERVATION Rolla, Missouri 1996 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report may be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey 1400 Independence Road Branch of Information Services Mail Stop 100 Box25286 Rolla, MO 65401 Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Abstract................................................................................................................................^ 1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................^^ 2 Purpose and Scope....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Fort Leonard Wood Military Reservation History and Facilities................................................................................ 5 Previous Investigations..................................................................^ 5 Environmental Setting .........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rivers: Revised November 2008; Caves: Revised July 2007; Trails: Revised March 2010; High Adventure: Revised September 2007
    Everything you need to know about more than 90 of the best camps in the region Including more than 60 High Adventure opportunities Images courtesy of: http://signal.baldwincity.com/news/2011/oct/20/local-boy-scouts-troop-remained-busy-during-summer/ http://i4.ytimg.com/vi/obn8RVY_szM/mgdefault.jpg http://www/sccovington.com/philmont/trek_info/equipment/tents.htm This is a publication of Tamegonit Lodge, the Order of the Arrow lodge affiliated with the Heart of America Council, BSA. Updated: December 2012 Additional copies of this publication are available through the Program Services Department at the Heart of America Council Scout Service Center 10210 Holmes Road Kansas City, Missouri 64131 Phone: (816) 942-9333 Toll Free: (800) 776-1110 Fax: (816) 942-8086 Online: www.hoac-bsa.org Camps: Revised December 2012; Rivers: Revised November 2008; Caves: Revised July 2007; Trails: Revised March 2010; High Adventure: Revised September 2007 HOAC – Order of the Arrow – ON THE LOOSE RIVERS – Page 1 Welcome to the adventures which the scenic rivers in southern Missouri offer. In the next pages many rivers are described, both in general and by specific sections. You will also find within this section a compilation of many public outfitters, which regularly provide all necessary equipment for a canoe trip. The river sections that are profiled are probably not the exact sections of river that you will float if you rent your canoes and equipment form an outfitter. Each outfitter has “normal” floats that you may choose from, and few, if any, of these floats will match with the sections profiled in On The Loose, or with the sections any other outfitter would float! After spending some time with the River Section of On The Loose, I feel that you will agree there are many more rivers, which can be floated than the ones commonly mentioned (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Stream, Riparian, and Floodplain Habitat Restoration Within Crooked and Huzzah Creeks
    Natural Resource Restoration in the Viburnum Trend: Stream, Riparian, and Floodplain Habitat Restoration within Crooked and Huzzah Creeks Draft Restoration Plan November 2019 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 Affected Environment and Summary of Injury to Natural Resources .................................................................. 3 3. Proposed Restoration Alternatives ........................................................................................................................ 4 Environmental Compliance .................................................................................................................................. 9 Monitoring ............................................................................................................................................................ 9 Agencies, Organizations, and Parties Consulted for Information ............................................................................ 9 Literature Cited ...................................................................................................................................................... 10 Part 1. Introduction This Draft Restoration Plan (RP) has been prepared by the Trustees to address natural resources injured and ecological services lost due to releases of hazardous substances, including heavy metals from mines, mills, smelters, and tailings impoundments of the
    [Show full text]