DOCSLIB.ORG

Geohydrologic and Water-Quality Assessment of the Fort Leonard Wood Military Reservation, Missouri, 1994-95

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geohydrologic and Water-Quality Assessment of the Fort Leonard Wood Military Reservation, Missouri, 1994-95 Geohydrologic and Water-Quality Assessment of the Fort Leonard Wood Military Reservation, Missouri, 1994-95 By Jeffrey L. Imes, John G. Schumacher, and Michael J. Kleeschulte_______________ U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4270 Prepared in cooperation with the DIRECTORATE OF PUBLIC WORKS, ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION, FORT LEONARD WOOD MILITARY RESERVATION Rolla, Missouri 1996 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report may be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey 1400 Independence Road Branch of Information Services Mail Stop 100 Box25286 Rolla, MO 65401 Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Abstract................................................................................................................................^ 1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................^^ 2 Purpose and Scope....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Fort Leonard Wood Military Reservation History and Facilities................................................................................ 5 Previous Investigations..................................................................^ 5 Environmental Setting .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Climatology............................................................................................^ 6 Physiography and Topography.................................................................................................................................... 6 Soil Types and Distribution......................................................................................................................................... 7 Geohydrologic Framework........................................... 7 Structural Setting......................................................................................................................................................... 8 Bedrock Geology and Stratigraphy............................................................................................................................. 10 Fracture Patterns and Karst Features........................................................................................................................... 10 Ground-Water Hydrology..............................................................................................................................................^ 12 Ground-Water Levels High-Base Flow.................................................................................................................... 13 Ground-Water Levels Low-Base Flow..................................................................................................................... 18 Vertical Ground-Water Flow........................................................................................................................................ 20 Dye-Trace Investigations of Fracture and Conduit Flow............................................................................................ 20 Surface-Water Hydrology...................................................................................................................................................... 33 Methodology................................................................................................................................................................ 35 High-Base Flow Stream and Spring Discharge........................................................................................................... 37 Low-Base Flow Stream and Spring Discharge............................................................................................................ 37 Ground-Water Discharge to Streams........................................................................................................................... 40 Water Quality......................................................................................................................................................................... 40 Methodology................................................................................................................................................................ 42 Quality Assurance........................................................................................................................................................ 44 Regional Ground-Water Quality.................................................................................................................................. 45 Spring-Water Quality................................................................................................................................................... 52 Surface-Water Quality................................................................................................................................................. 59 Streambed Sediment Quality....................................................................................................................................... 62 Summary and Conclusions..............................................................................................._^ 62 Selected References........................................................................................................._^ 64 FIGURES 1-3. Maps showing: 1. Location of the Fort Leonard Wood Military Reservation and 17 solid-waste management units identified as potential sources of ground- or surface-water contamination.................................................... 3 2. Bedrock geologic formations at the Fort Leonard Wood Military Reservation.............................................. 4 3. Distribution of sinkholes and springs at and near the Fort Leonard Wood Military Reservation.................. 9 Contents 4. Generalized geologic sections trending northwest to southeast across the Fort Leonard Wood Military Reservation...........................................................................................................-^ 11 5-8. Maps showing: 5. Altitude of shallow ground-water levels at and near the Fort Leonard Wood Military Reservation during high-base flow conditions................................................................................................................... 17 6. Altitude of shallow ground-water levels at and near the Fort Leonard Wood Military Reservation during low-base flow conditions .................................................................................................................... 19 7. Injection and recovery points for dye-trace tests T103-01 to T103-07 and historical dye-trace tests at and near the Fort Leonard Wood Military Reservation.............................................................................. 22 8. Distribution of charcoal packets placed in surface water and springs for monitoring of background dye concentrations at and near the Fort Leonard Wood Military Reservation............................................... 23 9-15. Graphs showing spectral analysis of fluorescent material extracted from activated charcoal packets placed in: 9. Shanghai Spring during dye-trace test T103-01............................................................................................. 25 10. Miller Spring during dye-trace test T103-03.................................................................................................. 26 11. Miller Spring during dye-trace test T103-04.................................................................................................. 27 12. Shanghai Spring during dye-trace test T103-05............................................................................................. 28 13. Roubidoux Spring during dye-trace test T103-06.......................................................................................... 29 14. The pumping station spring during dye-trace test T103-07 ........................................................................... 30 15. Shanghai Spring during dye-trace test T103-07............................................................................................. 31 16-19. Maps showing: 16. Probable catchment areas of selected major springs at and near the Fort Leonard Wood Military Reservation..................................................................................................................................................... 32 17. Stream discharge measurements for the high-base flow seepage run made on the Big Piney River, Roubidoux Creek, and selected small tributary streams in December 1994 at and near the Fort Leonard Wood Military Reservation.............................................................................................................. 34 18. Stream discharge measurements for the high-base flow seepage run made on the Big Piney River in February 1995 at and near the Fort Leonard Wood Military Reservation...................................................... 38 19. Stream discharge measurements for low-base flow seepage run made on the Big Piney River, Roubidoux Creek, and selected small tributary streams in September 1995 at and near the Fort Leonard Wood Military
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Description of the Study Area
    Description of the study Area Description: Description of the Study Area: The Big Piney Watershed is located in central Missouri and covers approximately 755 square miles in four counties. These counties include Texas, Howell, Phelps, and Pulaski Counties (see Big Piney- map.pdf). Most of the watershed (74%) lies within Texas County, while Pulaski, Phelps, and Howell Counties contain 14%, 12%, and less than 1% of the watershed respectively. The Big Piney Watershed is bounded on the west, north and a portion of the east side by the remainder of the Gasconade Basin. The Meramec, Current, and Jacks Fork Watersheds bound the Big Piney on the remainder of the East side, while the North Fork watershed lies on its southern boundary. The Big Piney Watershed has 5 cities and towns within or partially within its boundary. They include Cabool, Houston, Licking, Raymondville, and St. Robert. The Big Piney's land cover use is described in the Big Piney Land cover use.pdf. The majority of the Big Piney is fores, with grassland being a distant second as far as land use/cover type. The Big Piney River begins as a first order stream approximately 4 miles northwest of Cabool, Missouri. From its beginnings, the stream flows in a southeasterly direction for approximately 4 miles before entering the city of Cabool, Missouri. It then continues in a southeasterly direction for 2 miles before turning northeast and following the outskirts of Cabool for an additional 2 miles. From Cabool, the river continues in a northeasterly direction for 35 miles before turning to the North, Northeast.
    [Show full text]
  • Stream Teams Unite to Protect
    Big County Piney River, Texas By Peter Maki, Stream 4623 Team September – October 2012 4654 Stream Teams Information for and about Missouri Stream Teams Strong! INSIDE Stream Teams Unite to Protect THIS ISSUE Big Piney River 2 Stream Team Awards By Susan Higgins, DNR VWQM Coordinator Monitoring Minutes: n May 24th, after several false starts, the Equipment Reorder & Return Big Piney Watershed Committee finally Level 1 VWQM Ocame together to start a Stream Team Workshops Scheduled Association, adopting the name Big Piney River Stream Team Watershed Association. Peter Team Snapshots Maki (Stream Team 4623) of Top of the Ozarks 3 Riffle Review The Houston Scouts – ready to get some garbage! Resource Conservation & Development, Inc. has Team Calendar been serving as meeting facilitator since January well as free shuttle service and the use of 20 4 Teams in Action and is very happy with the success they have had canoes for the river cleanup. getting organized. All in all, the volunteers covered 18.6 miles Activity Report 5 They got off to a great start with a of river and brought in 55 tires, 215 pounds of Osuccessful Big Piney River Cleanup on June scrap metal, and 1,466 pounds of trash. Adding 7 Activity Prize Winners 23rd, organized by Debbie Miller from the Kabul to the total pulled from the river were things Things You Find When Waterdogs (Stream Team 3419). The Boiling like chairs, carpet, a burn barrel, and a car the Water Goes Down Springs Access was the starting point for the trunk lid. Of the tires retrieved, five were large Reminder: Stream Team cleanup and they registered 72 volunteers on site.
    [Show full text]
  • IN OLD PULASKI Momentum
    Old Settlers Gazette 2012 - Page 6 he Pulaski County news of one hundred years ago reveals a feeling of good times in our central Ozarks. There was general Tprosperity and businesses in our of towns and villages were making im- provements and expanding. Fencing in stock and drinking alcoholic bever- News 1912 ages were still controversial issues. Agitation for better roads was gaining IN OLD PULASKI momentum. he newspapers had a network Overall, 1912 was a progressive year. of community correspon- Although Theodore Roosevelt’s term dents. Each correspondent re- as President was over in March of ported who was sick, who visited 1909, his Progressive Movement lead- whom, who sold what, and what ership had imbued the country with T was being built. This type of news his energetic spirit. TR apparently accounted for about 90 per cent of missed the challenges of the office as the local news ink. We have gener- he made a run for a third term in this ally omitted the sick call and the vis- election year. Although the Pulaski County Democ- itation reports. The larger railroad rat is our most often used source to towns (Dixon, Crocker, and Rich- give you a notion of life a century ago, land) usually reported each week. we also read papers from neighboring News from the smaller communi- counties. There a re items from the ties (e.g. Decker, Bailey, and Lebanon Rustic (Laclede), Licking News Hooker) was reported sporadically. and Houston Herald (Texas), and Rolla Some of these communities in Pu- Herald (Phelps). These counties are in laski County have lost their identity the area known as “Old Pulaski,” today for the general public (see when antebellum Pulaski included map at left).
    [Show full text]
  • Fortfort Leelee
    UnitedUnited StatesStates ArmyArmy CombinedCombined ArmsArms SupportSupport CommandCommand andand FortFort LeeLee 1 COL John Angevine, IMNE-LEE-G, [email protected]; 804/734-7188; DSN 687 241200Jun05 Agenda 0830 Arrive Garrison HQS Building 8000 0830 – 0840 En route to CASCOM – COL Angevine/Mrs. Lee 0845 – 0900 Office Call with CG - MG Dunwoody 0900 - 0905 Welcome and Introductions – COL Angevine 0905 – 0915 BRAC Team Visit – COL (Ret) Dinsick 0915 – 1000 Fort Lee Background Briefing – COL Angevine 1000 - 1045 CSS Center of Excellence Concept Briefing – COL Mullins 1045 – 1115 Break and pick up lunch 1115 – 1200 Review of BRAC Recommendations and Impacts – Mrs. Lee 1200 – 1300 BRAC Construction Requirements – Mr. Greg White, DPWL 1300 – 1400 Logistics Warrior Training – Mr. Don Bradshaw, DPTMS 1400 - Questions & Answers 2 FOCUS Installation Responsibilities Community Impact Current Missions/Functions Current Facilities/Infrastructure/Infostructure Fort Lee 2020 Quality of Life Future Mission Capability 3 Population • Active duty permanent party – Officers 580 – Enlisted 2585 • Civilians 3182 • Contractors 1330 • Family members – On-post 3197 – Off-post 2371 • Retirees, survivors & family On an average day, members 55,220 there are over 20,000 People • Student Average Annual on Fort Lee! Load Over 35,000 4 Workforce Diversity Fort Lee is the model employer with a diverse and effective work force incorporating the principles of equitable treatment and equal employment opportunity as integral parts of its mission. Our workforce mirrors
    [Show full text]
  • For Publication. the Version of the Proposed Rule R
    This document has been submitted to the Office of the Federal Register (OFR) for publication. The version of the proposed rule released today may vary slightly from the published document if minor editorial changes are made during the OFR review process. The document published in the Federal Register will be the official document. Appendix A to part 802- List of Military Installations Part 1 Site Name Location Adelphi Laboratory Center Adelphi, MD Air Force Maui Optical and Supercomputing Maui, HI Site Air Force Office of Scientific Research Arlington, VA Andersen Air Force Base Yigo, Guam Army Futures Command Austin, TX Army Research Lab – Orlando Simulations Orlando, FL and Training Technology Center Army Research Lab – Raleigh Durham Raleigh Durham, NC Arnold Air Force Base Coffee County and Franklin County, TN Beale Air Force Base Yuba City, CA Biometric Technology Center (Biometrics Clarksburg, WV Identity Management Activity) Buckley Air Force Base Aurora, CO Camp MacKall Pinebluff, NC Cape Cod Air Force Station Sandwich, MA Cape Newenham Long Range Radar Site Cape Newenham, AK Cavalier Air Force Station Cavalier, ND Cheyenne Mountain Air Force Station Colorado Springs, CO Clear Air Force Station Anderson, AK Creech Air Force Base Indian Springs, NV Davis-Monthan Air Force Base Tucson, AZ Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Arlington, VA Eareckson Air Force Station Shemya, AK Eielson Air Force Base Fairbanks, AK Ellington Field Joint Reserve Base Houston, TX Fairchild Air Force Base Spokane, WA Fort Benning Columbus, GA Fort Belvoir Fairfax County, VA Fort Bliss El Paso, TX Fort Campbell Hopkinsville, KY Fort Carson Colorado Springs, CO Fort Detrick Frederick, MD Fort Drum Watertown, NY Fort Gordon Augusta, GA Fort Hood Killeen, TX 129 This document has been submitted to the Office of the Federal Register (OFR) for publication.
    [Show full text]
  • 12Th Biennial Symposium
    12th Biennial Symposium April 12 – 14, 2021 Program and Abstracts 2 Table of Contents Meeting at a Glance 3 Definitions 4 Symposium Sponsors 5 2021 Virtual Symposium Local Committee 6 Acknowledgements 7 FMCS Standing Officers 7 FMCS Committees: Chairs, and Co-Chairs 8 Plenary Session 10 Networking Break Out Sessions 11 Oral and Poster Presentations Discussion Forum 12 Committee Meetings 13 Contributed Presentations (Titles and Authors) 14 Full Abstracts 42 FMCS Code of Conduct 152 Photo: Ryan Hagerty (USFWS) FMCS Virtual Symposium 2021 Back to the Future: The Virtual Unknown 3 Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society Virtual Symposium April 12 – 14, 2021 Back to the Future: The Virtual Unknown Meeting at a Glance Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Monday (12 April 2021) Tuesday (13 April 2021) Wednesday (14 April 2021) 8:00am: Symposium Web Page Opens 9:45am – 10:45am: Breakfast at FMCS 9:45am – 10:45am: Breakfast at FMCS Recorded Oral/Poster Presentations Visible Live Networking Sessions Live Networking Sessions 11:00am - 1:00pm: Board Meeting 10:45am - 11:00am: Coffee Break 10:45am - 11:00am: Coffee Break Live Session 11:00am - 12:00pm: Oral and Poster 11:00am - 12:00pm: Oral and Poster 1:00pm - 1:15pm: Coffee Break Presentations Discussion Forum 1 Presentations Discussion Forum 1 Live Sessions Live Sessions 1:15pm – 2:30pm: Welcome and Plenary Session Live Session 12:00am - 12:15m: Coffee Break 12:00am - 12:15m: Coffee Break 2:30pm - 2:45pm: Coffee Break 12:15pm - 2:00pm: Committee Meetings 1 12:15pm - 2:00pm: Committee Meetings 2 Live Sessions Live
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Leonard Wood Missouri
    DCN: 9222 FORT LEONARD WOOD MISSOURI LOCATION Fort Leonard Wood is located in central Missouri, about 120 miles southwest of St. Louis, Missouri, and 85 miles northeast of Springfield, Missouri along the I-44 corridor. The installation occupies the southwestern portion of Pulaski County, with small portions in Texas and Laclede counties. Fort Leonard Wood is located in a predominantly rural area, and is bordered on all sides by portions of the Mark Twain National Forest. Rural areas not included in the Rolla-Houston unit of the Forest are in agricultural use, primarily pasture for grazing. Development of the region adjacent to the installation is concentrated in the small towns of Waynesville and St. Robert located on the northern border of the installation and straddling Business Loop I-44, which was formerly U.S. Route 66. The installation can be divided into two topographic regions known as the Low Plains and High Plains. The High Plains, consisting of gently to moderately rolling dissected surfaces and comprise approximately 80 percent of the reservation. Slopes are largely 8 to 15 percent, but can reach 45 percent and greater along bluffs and deeply incised tributaries. Steep, deeply dissected surfaces are prominent adjacent to alluvial stream valleys in the northeast and western portions of the installation. The Low Plains area is characterized by major stream valleys and a ridge, which traverses the north central to south central portions of Fort Leonard Wood. These areas have level to gently rolling, moderately dissected topography. Slopes are largely between 0 and 3 percent, but may reach 15 percent in moderately dissected stream valleys and the south-central region of the installation.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Missouri's Streams
    The State of Missouri’s Streams Summary of Invertebrate Data 1993-2010 The State of Missouri’s Streams Report summarizes water quality in Missouri’s streams and rivers using biological data collected by trained citizen volun- teers through the Missouri Stream Team Program. This report was assembled by the Missouri Stream Team Watershed Coalition with the goal of describ- ing water quality across Missouri, providing feed- back to volunteers and educating citizens. Acknowledgements The Missouri Stream Team Watershed Coalition also like to thank the staff of the Missouri Stream would like to thank Dan Obrecht and Tony Thor- Team Program at Missouri Department of Con- pe, University of Missouri Senior Research Asso- servation and Missouri Department of Natural ciates, for compilation and interpretation of the Resources for their guidance and assistance in Stream Team volunteer data and creation of this this process. Appreciation is also given to Stream report. Their expertise in working with volunteer Team volunteers who have dedicated their time to data was instrumental in creating a publication monitoring our states streams and playing an ac- that truly showcases volunteer efforts while de- tive role in protecting our state’s water resources. scribing water quality across the state. We would Pat Jones on right. Photo by Dave Marner A special thanks to Mrs. Pat Jones for providing funding for this publication. Mrs. Jones is a long- time supporter of the Missouri Stream Team Pro- gram. Pat and her late husband Ted have provided many conservation legacies that make Missouri better for its people and its natural resources. Table of Contents Introduction Invertebrates as Indicators of Water Quality 2 Description of the Data 2 Sources of Data Variation 3 Water Quality Assessments Statewide Water Quality 4 Regional Reports 5-16 Each regional report contains a select analysis using regional data.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Joint Services Environmental
    Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Joint Services Environmental Management Conference March 2006 Ms. Sally Jo Hahn Environmental Specialist/POC for Alternative Fuel Infrastructure US Army Installation Management Agency/MPRI Our Mission -Manage Army installations to support readiness and mission execution – provide equitable services and facilities, optimize resources, sustain the environment and enhance the well-being of the Military community Leading Change for Installation Excellence Ms. Sally Jo Hahn / IMAH-LOD-S / (512)(703) 636-7077602-4680 / [email protected] 1of1 131of1 20 301611R172017Z MarchJanuary 2005 2006 FEDERALFEDERAL REQUIREMENTSREQUIREMENTS • Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPAct) - 75% of Vehicles Purchased/Leased Must Be Alternative Fuel Vehicles (AFV) - Within MSA With Population > 250,000 - Light Duty Vehicles (Sedans/Trucks <8,500 lb Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) • Executive Order 13149 (April 2000) - Federal Automotive Statistical Tool (FAST) - Reduce 2005 Non-Tactical Vehicle (NTV) Petroleum Use by 20% from 1999 Baseline - Use Alternative Fuels in AFV 51% of Time - Increase NTV Fleet MPG •Energy Policy Act of 2005 - AFVs purchased under EPAct must use alternative fuels, unless waiver is granted - Waivers - only if fuel not readily available or too expensive - GSA to spread incremental cost of AFVs across all vehicles Ms. Sally Jo Hahn / IMAH-LOD-S / (703) 602-4680 / [email protected] 2of2 20 301611R January 2006 ALTERNATIVEALTERNATIVE FUELSFUELS ETHANOL:ETHANOL: WhatWhat isis it?it? • Pure ethanol (ethyl alcohol) – derived from grain and other renewable resources • Ethanol blends (Exx) - alcohol fuel blends designated by E and the percentage of alcohol by volume in the blend • Examples: • E10 is 10% denatured ethanol blended with 90% gasoline • E85, commonly called fuel ethanol, is 85% denatured ethanol blended with 15% gasoline • E100 is 100% denatured ethanol Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • A Downtown Story: Waynesville Makes a Comeback
    CITY Review by Luge Hardman A DOWNTOWN STORY: WAYNESVILLE MAKES A COMEBACK Waynesville sits in south central Missouri along I-44 and store closed with the opening of a new, modern supermarket on Historic Route 66. The City was settled in 1833 on the in West Waynesville. With the burning of the Western Auto banks of the Roubidoux Creek and was incorporated in store, the death of downtown had become apparent. Things 1843. Waynesville’s history encompasses the Trail of Tears, were bleak in downtown Waynesville. the Civil War, World War II and the building of the “Mother As a retired high school teacher, I was well aware that the Road” across America. City’s reputation was tied to the appearance of its downtown Waynesville is the county seat of Pulaski County and the square. I was somewhat embarrassed at times with the county courthouse dominates the center of the square. The reputation that Waynesville had with neighboring schools. courthouse has brought several attorneys to downtown. It An editorial in a Jefferson City newspaper in the 1980s is also home to the U. S. Post Office, and several retail shops described us this way: “On a good day Waynesville, Missouri, and restaurants. Route 66 runs through town, as does the isn’t very pleasant. You know you have hit the end of the road.” Roubidoux Creek, home to a blue ribbon The downtown area was dark with very little trout stream. The 1903 courthouse, one of street lighting. Sidewalks around the square two original Missouri courthouses that sit were broken and falling apart and remnants directly on Route 66, is open to tourists at A new interest in of more than 20 sign poles jutted out of old specified times.
    [Show full text]
  • Rivers: Revised November 2008; Caves: Revised July 2007; Trails: Revised March 2010; High Adventure: Revised September 2007
    Everything you need to know about more than 90 of the best camps in the region Including more than 60 High Adventure opportunities Images courtesy of: http://signal.baldwincity.com/news/2011/oct/20/local-boy-scouts-troop-remained-busy-during-summer/ http://i4.ytimg.com/vi/obn8RVY_szM/mgdefault.jpg http://www/sccovington.com/philmont/trek_info/equipment/tents.htm This is a publication of Tamegonit Lodge, the Order of the Arrow lodge affiliated with the Heart of America Council, BSA. Updated: December 2012 Additional copies of this publication are available through the Program Services Department at the Heart of America Council Scout Service Center 10210 Holmes Road Kansas City, Missouri 64131 Phone: (816) 942-9333 Toll Free: (800) 776-1110 Fax: (816) 942-8086 Online: www.hoac-bsa.org Camps: Revised December 2012; Rivers: Revised November 2008; Caves: Revised July 2007; Trails: Revised March 2010; High Adventure: Revised September 2007 HOAC – Order of the Arrow – ON THE LOOSE RIVERS – Page 1 Welcome to the adventures which the scenic rivers in southern Missouri offer. In the next pages many rivers are described, both in general and by specific sections. You will also find within this section a compilation of many public outfitters, which regularly provide all necessary equipment for a canoe trip. The river sections that are profiled are probably not the exact sections of river that you will float if you rent your canoes and equipment form an outfitter. Each outfitter has “normal” floats that you may choose from, and few, if any, of these floats will match with the sections profiled in On The Loose, or with the sections any other outfitter would float! After spending some time with the River Section of On The Loose, I feel that you will agree there are many more rivers, which can be floated than the ones commonly mentioned (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • US Army Organizational Codes
    Incident Qualification and Certification System Agency Hierarchy Agency: ARMY0 Lvl Org Code and Description 1 USARMY United States Army 2 0100000 IMCOM Pacific Regional Office 3 01AK001 Fort Greely 4 01AK001FES Fort Greely FES 4 01AK001NR Fort Greely NR 3 01AK002 Fort Wainwright 4 01AK002FES Fort Wainwright FES 4 01AK002NR Fort Wainwright NR 3 01HI001 USAG Schofield 4 01HI001FES USAG Schofield FES 4 01HI001NR USAG Schofield NR 3 01HI002 USAG Hawaii PTA 4 01HI002FES USAG Hawaii PTA FES 4 01HI002NR USAG Hawaii PTA NR 2 0200000 IMCOM West Regional Office 3 02AZ001 Ft. Huachuca 4 02AZ001FES Ft. Huachuca FES 4 02AZ001NR Ft. Huachuca NR 3 02AZ002 Yuma Proving Ground 4 02AZ002FES Yuma Proving Ground FES 4 02AZ002NR Yuma Proving Ground NR 3 02CA001 Camp Parks 4 02CA001FES Camp Parks FES 4 02CA001NR Camp Parks NR 3 02CA002 Ft. Hunter Liggett 4 02CA002FES Ft. Hunter Liggett FES 4 02CA002NR Ft. Hunter Liggett NR 3 02CA003 Ft. Irwin 4 02CA003FES Ft. Irwin FES 4 02CA003NR Ft. Irwin NR 3 02CA004 Persidio Mont. 4 02CA004FES Persidio Mont. FES 4 02CA004NR Persidio Mont. NR 3 02CA005 Shape Army Depot 4 02CA005FES Shape Army Depot FES 4 02CA005NR Shape Army Depot NR 3 02CA006 Military Ocean Terminal Concord 4 02CA006FES Military Ocean Terminal Concord FES 4 02CA006NR Military Ocean Terminal Concord NR 3 02CA007 Sierra Army Depot 4 02CA007FES Sierra Army Depot FES 4 02CA007NR Sierra Army Depot NR 3 02NV001 Hawthorne Army Depot 4 02NV001FES Hawthorne Army Depot FES 4 02NV001NR Hawthorne Army Depot NR 3 02UT001 Dugway Proving Ground 4 02UT001FES Dugway Proving
    [Show full text]