DOCSLIB.ORG

Volume 42, December 2019 Gdonm Editor: Nicky Hayes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Volume 42, December 2019 Gdonm Editor: Nicky Hayes Testing International Volume 42, December 2019 Gdonm Editor: Nicky Hayes International Test Contents Commission ITC President’s Message 2 PRESIDENT Kurt Geisinger Editor’s Message 3 Buros Center for Testing / University of Nebraska, USA Conference News 5 Publication and Communications Committee 7 PRESIDENT-ELECT Aletta Odendaal International Journal of Testing update 8 Stellenbosch University, South Africa Membership, Involvement & Marketing Committee 9 SECRETARY-GENERAL Paula Elosua, Universidad del Pais Vasco, San Research & Guidelines Committee 12 Sebastian, Spain Around the World: the SIP 13 TREASURER April Zenisky, University of Massachusetts Book Review: schooling across the globe 16 Amherst, USA Compêndio de Avaliação Psicológica 17 COUNCIL MEMBERS Elected Members ITC book series: new book preview 18 Anna Brown, University of Kent, United Kingdom Philippe Sonnleitner: Gamification - 3 Lessons learned 22 Neal Schmitt, Michigan State University, USA Stephen G. Sireci, University of Massachusetts Keesha Taylor: Diminishing academic cheating 26 Amherst, USA Solange Wechsler, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil Co-Opted Members Dragos Iliescu, SNSPA Bucharest, Romania Kadriye Ercikan, Educational Testing Service, USA Peter Macqueen, Compass Consulting, Australia Wayne Camra ACT Inc. Observers Samuel Greiff, Université du Luxembourg, Luxembourg Gonggy Yan, Beijing Normal University REPRESENTATIVES IUPsyS Representative Ann Watts, IUPsyS IAAP Representative Jacques Gregoire, Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium EDITORS International Journal of Testing Stephen Stark, University of South Florida, USA Testing International Nicky Hayes, United Kingdom Testing International is a publication of the International Test Commission ITC President’s Message Sharing internationally has become easier Kurt Geisinger with the Internet. But face-to-face sharing continues to be best! I have seen the listing President, of invited speakers and it is a impressive list. International Test Hearing from David Bartram or Barbara Byrne Commission alone is worth the price of admission and I hope Ron Hambleton will be there; meeting him and catching his enthusiasm is equally valuable. Kurt Geisinger As a student/intern some 44 years ago, I was Buros Centre for Testing / working with a distinguished psychometrician. University of Nebraska He told me that when he was my age (at that time) he thought he had invented a new and great statistical procedure. He said he had As those of us in the northern hemisphere spent a year working on it and thought he had face the cold weather season, I for one am a new and better way to analyze data. But looking forward to the summer, and am in when he started using it, he realized he had particular looking forward to a summer re-invented principal component analysis. At highlight: the International Test Commission the time, this individual was in charge of biannual conference in Luxembourg. It is hard psychometric research at one of the major not to wax poetic or hyperbolic about the testing companies in the world. Needless to impact of the conference. I have attended say, we can all learn from others and learning the ITC conferences since 1999 when there from others from other countries is the most were two conferences organized by the fun way to do so. It can save us from wasting International Test Commission: one was a our time, but, more importantly, can help us semi-recognized conference on test learn new approaches and new techniques adaptation at Georgetown University in that may be more commonly used in the Washington, DC and the other was the official United States. One comes to realize too that ITC conference at the University of Graz in we are indeed all brothers and sisters around Graz, Austria. Both were outstanding the world; international conferences catalyze conferences—academic mountaintops (which such relationships and we can learn what life is easier to imagine in Austria than in the is like for many others. geological and political swampland of Washington, DC). And the ITC conferences In the past few months, a colleague of mine, have only become better and better. Janet Carlson, who also happens to be my wife, and I wrote a chapter on the history of When you receive this message, you may still psychological testing in North America for an have time to submit a symposium, paper, or ITC book that is being published on the history poster. I hope you do. The more different of testing around the world. I quickly came to voices the better. Testing in all its venues the understanding that American testing (clinical, educational, and industrial- would have been considerably behind where it organizational as examples) is a wonderful is today if not for work in Great Britain, profession and we should all be proud both to France, and Germany. Galton, Binet, and enjoy it and to share what we have learned Wundt, respectively, are gametes who with others. To me, that is the single brought about modern psychological testing greatest aspect of the conference. and we are all indebted to them and hundreds 2 of others! Sharing was critical around the beginning of the 20th century and it is just as important today. We can all be part of the continued development of testing. When I was an undergraduate student in Call for Nominations psychology, I had a rare opportunity. George Miller, a former American Psychological Thomas Oakland Award for Association President and a distinguished Distinguished Contributions to Testing experimental psychologist (who was famous for the “Magic Number 7 + or – 2”), came to and Assessment my campus to provide a series of lectures. I attended them and was even charged to walk The Thomas Oakland Award for Distinguished him from a couple of buildings to the next contributions to Testing and Assessment recognizes an building where he had meetings. I remember individual who has made noteworthy contributions to some of those discussions almost 50 years research or practice in educational or psychological assessment and who has had a positive impact at either later. At one point, he told me that an international level, or within their home country psychology as a social science had really had that represents a model for others to follow. Examples only two truly major contributions to include (but are not limited to): • innovative knowledge. The two were: learning and assessment formats that lead to more valid assessment testing. I might modernize his two terms • contributions to statistics or research design in test validation • improved procedures for adapting tests slightly to behavior change (learning) and across languages • improved methods for evaluating assessment (testing); neither of these word assessments used across multiple languages or cultures, changes are major ones. I believe that testing or • contributions to improved testing policies and continues to be one of the truly central foci in practices. psychology, and our work has spread into Nominators must be Full, Affiliate, or Individual business, education, and medicine to name a members of the ITC. All nominators must submit: (a) a few areas. nomination letter describing the nominee’s contributions; (b) two letters of support from two So please come to Luxembourg. This summer different countries, (c) a current copy of the nominee’s all roads lead to Luxembourg. I look forward CV, highlighting the scholarly accomplishments relevant to the nomination. to seeing you, but even more, I look forward to hearing what you have to say! Nominations should be sent to Stephen G. Sireci, Chair, Thomas Oakland Award Committee at [email protected]. Deadline for receipt of nominations: February 1, 2020. The recipient of the award receives free conference registration, and $1,000 in travel expenses to attend the conference. The award is given every second year, at the respective ITC Conference. 3 From the Editor Call for Papers Frontier Research in Educational Measurement (FREMO) will be hosted on September 9-10, 2020 at the University of Oslo, Norway. The submission system is open with submission Nicky Hayes deadline February 2. The conference website is at http://www.uio.no/fremo. Editor "Testing International" For more information, please contact Bjorn Anderson at [email protected]. Welcome to the latest issue of Testing International. As our Chairman says, we're all getting excited about our visit to Luxembourg in Call for Articles and July! All the details are on the website, so don't Announcements: forget to book in! This issue sees an interesting set of committee Testing International (TI) reports, letting us all know what has been happening behind the scenes since out last issue. Deadline for the June 2020 issue: In addition to these, we have an article about the May 15, 2020 new testing section of the SIP: the Sociedad Interamericana de Psicología, bringing together TI is the newsletter of the International Test testing professionals from across the Americas . Commission, and disseminates information I'm delighted to report that we have three book about national / international assessment reviews this issue - do please let us know your projects and initiatives, new test opinion of any books on testing that you've come developments, recently published books / articles, upcoming conferences and across! workshops, and topical issues in the field of Finally, Philippe Sonnleitner continues our testing and assessment to the international discussion of gamified testing with a useful community.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oecd Secretary-General Tax Report to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors
    OECD SECRETARY-GENERAL TAX REPORT TO G20 FINANCE MINISTERS AND CENTRAL BANK GOVERNORS Saudi Arabia July 2020 For more information: [email protected] www.oecd.org/tax @OECDtax | 1 OECD Secretary-General Tax Report to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors Saudi Arabia July 2020 PUBE 2 | This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of OECD member countries. Please cite this report as: OECD (2020), OECD Secretary-General Tax Report to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors – July 2020, OECD, Paris. www.oecd.org/tax/oecd-secretary-general-tax-report-g20-finance-ministers-july-2020.pdf Note by Turkey The information in this document with reference to “Cyprus” relates to the southern part of the Island. There is no single authority representing both Turkish and Greek Cypriot people on the Island. Turkey recognises the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). Until a lasting and equitable solution is found within the context of the United Nations, Turkey shall preserve its position concerning the “Cyprus issue”. Note by all the European Union Member States of the OECD and the European Union The Republic of Cyprus is recognised by all members of the United Nations with the exception of Turkey. The information in this document relates to the area under the effective control of the Government of the Republic of Cyprus.
    [Show full text]
  • HYPOSTAT-2020-FINAL.Pdf
    HYPOSTAT 2020 HYPOSTAT 2020 | A REVIEW OF EUROPE’S MORTGAGE AND HOUSING MARKETS European Mortgage Federation November 2020 DISCLAIMER The entire content of this publication is protected by copyright. All rights offer to purchase or subscribe for securities or financial instruments or reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval any advice or recommendation with respect to such securities or other system, or transmitted in any other form or by any means: electronic, me- financial instruments. chanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission Neither the European Mortgage Federation nor the authors contributing to of the European Mortgage Federation – European Covered Bond Council. Hypostat shall accept any liability whatsoever (whether in negligence, tort Hypostat 2020 and the information, statements and opinions contained or otherwise) arising in any way in relation to the statements contained in the document are intended for information purposes only and do not herein or in relation to any loss arising from their use or otherwise arising replace independent professional judgment. in connection with this document. Hypostat 2020 and the information, statements and opinions contained Nothing in this document shall be construe as investment, legal, tax or in the document do not constitute any solicitation or a public offer other professional advice by the European Mortgage Federation or the under any applicable legislation or an offer to sell or solicitation of an authors contributing
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPE DAY Europe Day Is One of the Symbols of the European Union
    EUROPE DAY Europe Day is one of the symbols of the European Union Europe Day, which is celebrated on 9 May, is dedicated to celebrating peace and unity in Europe. At the same time, it marks the beginning of the establishment of the European Union as we know it today. On 9 May 1950, the then French Foreign Minister Robert Schuman called on European countries to join their coal and steel production. This association later became the present-day EU. France – the largest, Malta – the smallest 633,000 square kilometres is the area of France, the largest EU Member State. 135 square kilometres is the area of Malta, the smallest EU Member State. 1,450 people per square kilometre is population density in Malta, the most densely populated EU Member State. 18 people per square kilometre is population density in Finland, the least densely populated EU Member State. 103 people per square kilometre is population density in Slovenia, which ranks our country in the middle of EU-27 Member States. Germany has 160-times the population of Malta At the start of 2020, the population of EU-27 was 447.3 million. In 2020, Germany had the largest population (83.2 million) and Malta the smallest (0.5 million). With 2.1 million residents, Slovenia was among the smaller EU-27 Member States, as only Latvia, Estonia, Cyprus, Luxembourg and Malta had fewer residents. Population in EU-27 Member States, 2020 15.0 mio. or more 10.0–14.9 mio. 5.0–9.9 mio. 1.0–4.9 mio.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptability Report Domestic Adaptability, International Cooperation M O C
    Adaptability Report Domestic Adaptability, International Cooperation m o c . e b o d a . k c Sustainable Governance o t s - e g Indicators 2019 e v © Sustainable Governance SGI Indicators SGI 2019 | 2 Adaptability Indicator Domestic Adaptability Question To what extent does the government respond to international and supranational developments by adapting domestic government structures? 41 OECD and EU countries are sorted according to their performance on a scale from 10 (best) to 1 (lowest). This scale is tied to four qualitative evaluation levels. 10-9 = The government has appropriately and effectively adapted domestic government structures to international and supranational developments. 8-6 = In many cases, the government has adapted domestic government structures to international and supranational developments. 5-3 = In some cases, the government has adapted domestic government structures to international and supranational developments. 2-1 = The government has not adapted domestic government structures, no matter how beneficial adaptation might be. Sweden Score 10 Following Sweden’s EU membership, which came into force in the mid-1990s, there has been a sustained effort to adapt government, policy and regulation to EU standards. The bulk of this adaptation relates to changes in domestic regulatory frameworks and policies, a development that does not impact the structure of government. Estimates suggest that some 75% of the regulations that pertain to Sweden are today EU rules, not domestic rules. This pattern is probably typical for all EU member states. However, Sweden is today among the forerunners in the EU with respect to its adoption of EU directives and decisions. Most of the adaptation has taken place not at the policy level, but on the administrative level (e.g., by integrating domestic regulatory agencies with EU agencies).
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2015 Annual Report 2015 INTRODUCTORY WORDS
    annual report 2015 annual report 2015 INTRODUCTORY WORDS Dear Reader, Another year of intensive work has passed, a year of development and international activities. Owing to six preceeding presidencies efforts, during the Latvian Presidency of the Council of the European Union amendments were adopted to the Regulation on European Statistics, strengthening the ESS governance, and professional independence of official statistical institutions. The amendments also affect statistical quality issues and reduction of respondent burden, entitling statistical institutes to take a more active role in production and use of administrative data sources. The new Statistics Law which was drafted by the CSB and adopted by the Parliament this year is closely related to this. It includes legal framework of operating principles for statistical institutions set forth in the national legislation, the Regulation on European Statistics, and the European Statistics Code of Practice. The CSB faces new challenges associated with the accession to the OECD; its recommendations are consistent with the development of the ESS and CSB operating strategy for 2014–2016. We have joined the Vision 2020 strategy by promoting standardisation of statistical processes, use of innovative solutions in infrastructure, quality improvement, identifying and meeting the needs of data users, as well as by taking measures for raising the level of competence, skills and knowledge of our employees. In 2015 the CSB received the highest e-index rating among the public authorities, thus proving effeciency of e-governance in the Central Statistical Bureau. I am very happy and satisfied, since the expertise of CSB employees is the key drive towards our success.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptability Report | SGI Sustainable Governance Indicators 2017
    Adaptability Report u i L Domestic Adaptability, International Cooperation C Z / o t o h p k c o t S i / s Sustainable Governance e g a m I y t Indicators 2017 t e G Sustainable Governance SGI Indicators SGI 2017 | 2 Adaptability Indicator Domestic Adaptability Question To what extent does the government respond to international and supranational developments by adapting domestic government structures? 41 OECD and EU countries are sorted according to their performance on a scale from 10 (best) to 1 (lowest). This scale is tied to four qualitative evaluation levels. 10-9 = The government has appropriately and effectively adapted domestic government structures to international and supranational developments. 8-6 = In many cases, the government has adapted domestic government structures to international and supranational developments. 5-3 = In some cases, the government has adapted domestic government structures to international and supranational. 2-1 = The government has not adapted domestic government structures no matter how useful adaptation might be. Sweden Score 10 Following Sweden’s EU membership, which came into force in the mid-1990s, there has been a sustained effort to adapt government, policy and regulation to European Union standards. The bulk of this adaptation relates to changes in domestic regulatory frameworks and policies, a development that does not impact the structure of government. Estimates suggest that some 75% of the regulations that pertain to Sweden are today EU rules, not domestic rules. This pattern is probably typical for all EU member states. Most of the adaptation has taken place not at the policy level, but on the administrative level, for instance by integrating domestic regulatory agencies with EU agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Luxembourg Report Jochen Zenthöfer, Wolfgang Lorig, Nils C
    Luxembourg Report Jochen Zenthöfer, Wolfgang Lorig, Nils C. Bandelow (Coordinator) Sustainable Governance Indicators 2019 © vege - stock.adobe.com Sustainable Governance SGI Indicators SGI 2019 | 2 Luxembourg Report Executive Summary Luxembourg is an economically prosperous country in the middle of Europe. It is a member of all important and relevant economic alliances. On 1 January 2018, the country had 602,000 inhabitants, the highest level in its history, of whom 47.9% are foreigners (compared to 43% in 2011 and 29% in 1991). In recent years, tens of thousands of people have been naturalized Luxembourgish. Dual nationality is possible with many countries within the European Union. In addition, following the Brexit vote in the United Kingdom, the number of UK applicants for a Luxembourg passport has increased significantly. In 2017, more than 9,000 people were naturalized. That was almost 2,000 more applications than in 2016 and 15 times as many as in 2000. In 2017, Luxembourg received 2,300 refugees. Overall, the country is coping well with immigration. Xenophobia and anti-Semitism are not widespread, and are consistently punished by the courts. In 2017, the number of employed people in Luxembourg reached a new high of 432,000 (compared to 418,000 in 2016). In 2000, the number of employed people was only 264,000. However, 175,000 of Luxembourg’s 432,000 employees are cross-border workers from Luxembourg’s three neighboring countries and this number is increasing. In 2017, the average disposable income per household reached a record high of €5,584 per month. The median household income was €4,666 per month.
    [Show full text]
  • Integration of Statistical and Geospatial Information"
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION EUROSTAT Directorate E Sectoral and Regional Statistics Unit E-4 Regional statistics and geographical information Luxembourg, 16 April 2019 Minutes of the meeting of the Working Group "Integration of statistical and geospatial information" Held on 28 March 2019 Luxembourg, Eurostat - BECH building, room Ampere 1. Approval of the agenda, adoption of minutes of the previous meeting The chair of the meeting, Ruxandra ROMAN-ENESCU (Head of Unit E-4, Eurostat) welcomed all participants and proposed the agenda of the meeting. The agenda was approved. The minutes1 of the previous meeting, held on 17 April 2018 were adopted without changes. 2. Nature of the meeting The meeting was non-public. 3. List of points discussed All presentations are available from the CIRCABC2 site of the 2019 Working Group. Item 2: Total Surface Area and Total Land Area 2016 data Discussion Eurostat noted that the document under preparation is not yet finalised. The Working Group will be consulted on this Item with a written procedure. Item 3: GEOSTAT 3 – An implementation guide for the GSGF for Europe – final results Presentation 1 https://circabc.europa.eu/ui/group/50720c2a-c841-4b50-8f15-6f450a141707/library/88e6be87-4501-4101- 8e21-a7742e8b3d9a/details 2 https://circabc.europa.eu/ui/group/50720c2a-c841-4b50-8f15-6f450a141707 The GEOSTAT consortium presented the results of the GEOSTAT 3 project. The main goal of the project was to develop a European guide for the implementation of the Global Statistical Geospatial Framework (GSGF). The input into this implementation guide had come from a variety of sources, including relevant national activities, research, project activities and discussions with UN-GGIM and UN-GGIM: Europe stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-19: Europe Guide for Employers
    COVID-19: EUROPE GUIDE FOR EMPLOYERS Employment Law Expertise Provided by the European Members of the INTRODUCTION Today, across the globe, companies are trying to balance the many business challenges that are occurring due to the global pandemic of the COVID-19 virus. Employers are doing their best to take the necessary actions to protect their employees, but with local laws and government regulations constantly changing, it is difficult to keep up with the most important issues. In this white paper, the ELA members from 35 jurisdictions across Europe have provided answers to the most pressing questions regarding how different countries are managing the pandemic and taking steps toward recovery. This is a guide for European employers, listing the appropriate actions they must take in order to meet the needs of their employees, while also making important choices necessary to keep business moving forward. We hope that this paper helps you address key issues in your jurisdiction and where you do business in Europe. As the situation is constantly evolving, readers should take note that this publication is accurate as of 8 May 2020. Readers should also keep abreast of developments in the countries of concern to them. If you have additional questions or need further information, please reach out to the contributors individually. Copyright 2020 Employment Law Alliance, (ELA). The Employment Law Alliance is a global consortium of more than 3000 labor, employment and immigration attorneys in over 100 countries. This publication is not intended to provide legal advice but rather information on legal matters and employment law news of interest to our clients, colleagues and individuals who have requested such information.
    [Show full text]
  • Intermodal Transport in the Age of COVID-19 Practices, Initiatives and Responses Building Pandemic-Resilient Transport Systems
    UNECE Intermodal Transport in the Age of COVID-19 Practices, Initiatives and Responses BuildingPeople-Smart pandemic-resilient Sustainable transport systems Cities The Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has placed our increasingly interconnected world in an unprecedented situation. This crisis and Responses Initiatives − Practices, of COVID-19 in the Age Transport Intermodal has generated human distress and an economic downturn that is impacting global efforts to improve livelihoods and achieve the United ART Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). As the early response D SM CITIE to restraining the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic has shown, limited AN S F coordinated action undertaken in countries which included curtailing LE OR travel and closing borders, has negatively impacted our intensely B A A interconnected world. By these actions, transport operations have N L been affected which has led to disruption of supply chains and trade I L A flows. As a result, the delivery and availability of essential products A T G such as food or medicines became a common challenge undermining S E U countries’ capacity to respond to COVID-19 and begin to sustainably S recover. This publication provides a comprehensive overview of the S efforts made by the UNECE Sustainable Transport Division through the various Working Parties it administers in the field of inland transport to support member States in their responses to this crisis. Inter alia, the publication touches on issues relating to border crossing facilitation, Practices, Initiatives and
    [Show full text]
  • Safer Internet Day 2020 Public Report, March 2020
    Safer Internet Day 2020 Public report on campaign activities and successes March 2020 Further information on Safer Internet Day can be found at www.saferinternetday.org. Safer Internet Day 2020 Public report, March 2020 Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 2 Planning and pre-promotion of Safer Internet Day 2020 ................................................... 3 Safer Internet Day website .................................................................................................. 4 Social media ......................................................................................................................... 5 Stakeholders across the globe join “Together for a better internet” on SID 2020 .......... 7 Safer Internet Day and the Insafe-INHOPE network ........................................................ 8 Safer Internet Day Committees across the globe ........................................................... 9 Additional countries supporting SID................................................................................. 11 Industry support for SID ...................................................................................................... 11 The European Commission and Safer Internet Day .......................................................... 13 Measuring impact .................................................................................................................. 15 Social media
    [Show full text]
  • Luxembourg Report Klaus Schneider, Wolfgang Lorig, Nils C
    Luxembourg Report Klaus Schneider, Wolfgang Lorig, Nils C. Bandelow (Coordinator) Sustainable Governance Indicators 2018 © vege - stock.adobe.com Sustainable Governance SGI Indicators SGI 2018 | 2 Luxembourg Report Executive Summary Luxembourg is a founding member of the United Nations (1945), NATO (1949), the European Coal and Steel Community (1950), the European Economic Community (1957) and OECD (1960). It is also one of the three capitals of the EU, along with Brussels and Strasbourg. It hosts several EU institutions, including the Secretariat of the European Parliament, the European Court of Justice, EUROSTAT, the European Investment Bank and the European Stability Mechanism as well as several European Commission services. Approximately 12,000 EU officials work in Luxembourg and key EU ministerial meetings are regularly hosted in the Grand Duchy. Luxembourg also hosts the new European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO). Luxembourg’s economy is booming and profiting from an expanding EU and global economy. The attraction of new industries and businesses, public investments, and rising domestic demand are fueling economic growth. Luxembourg City is one of three EU capitals and a key international financial center. The country offers extraordinary business conditions with an attractive tax environment, high private and public investments, strong GDP growth, high living standard, an outstanding social security system, low unemployment, and consistently low central government debt. The country’s public administration is highly efficient and the overall economic outlook remains stable. Luxembourg has experienced strong economic growth and fiscal stability. This has provided public authorities the means to develop and maintain an outstanding welfare system over the last two decades, even as neighboring countries have reduced public welfare provision.
    [Show full text]