Annual Report 2006

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Report 2006 RA_2007_UNHCHR COUV DEF:Mise en page 1 18.5.2007 11:37 Page 1 Annual Report 2006 AnnualReport2006 Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Office ANNUAL REPORT 2006 Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Palais des Nations CH 1211 Geneva 10 – Switzerland Telephone : +41.22.917 90 00 Fax : +41.22.917 90 08 United Nations Human Rights www.ohchr.org Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights RA_2007_UNHCHR_DEF:Mise en page 1 18.5.2007 9:37 Page 1 AnnualReport2006 United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights RA_2007_UNHCHR_DEF:Mise en page 1 21.5.2007 7:17 Page 2 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction by the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights........ 5 2.0 About OHCHR ......................................................... 7 3.0 Implementing the High Commissioner’s Strategic Management Plan 2006-2007 . 13 3.1 A Mid-Term Assessment of Progress................................................ 14 Introduction ...................................................................... 14 OHCHR’s First Strategic Management Plan............................................... 14 Country Engagement ............................................................... 15 Leadership....................................................................... 18 Partnerships...................................................................... 20 Support for the new Human Rights Council and other United Nations human rights mechanisms ....... 22 Management and Planning........................................................... 24 Challenges and Lessons Learned...................................................... 25 3.2 OHCHR in the Field............................................................... 30 Introduction..................................................................... 30 OHCHR’s Approach to Fieldwork ...................................................... 30 Types of Field Presence ............................................................. 31 Headquarters Support to Field Operations ............................................... 35 Cooperation with Humanitarian Agencies ................................................ 35 OHCHR in Africa ................................................................. 38 Overview........................................................................ 38 Country Offices ................................................................... 39 Support to United Nations Peace Missions ............................................... 46 Other Activities in the Region ......................................................... 52 Challenges and Lessons Learned...................................................... 54 Priorities for 2007.................................................................. 55 OHCHR in Asia and the Pacific ..................................................... 56 Overview........................................................................ 56 Country Offices ................................................................... 57 Support to United Nations Peace Missions ............................................... 65 Support to United Nations Country Teams ............................................... 67 Other Activities in the Region ......................................................... 68 Challenges and Lessons Learned...................................................... 70 Priorities for 2007.................................................................. 70 OHCHR in the Middle East and North Africa .......................................... 72 Overview........................................................................ 72 Country Offices ................................................................... 73 Support to United Nations Peace Missions ............................................... 77 Other Activities in the Region ......................................................... 79 Challenges and Lessons Learned...................................................... 81 Priorities for 2007.................................................................. 81 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS RA_2007_UNHCHR_DEF:Mise en page 1 18.5.2007 9:37 Page 3 OHCHR in Europe, North America and Central Asia .................................... 82 Overview........................................................................ 82 Country Offices ................................................................... 83 Support to United Nations Peace Missions ............................................... 88 Support to United Nations Country Teams ............................................... 89 Other Activities in the Region ......................................................... 89 Challenges and Lessons Learned...................................................... 90 Priorities for 2007.................................................................. 91 OHCHR in Latin America and the Caribbean .......................................... 92 Overview........................................................................ 92 Country Offices ................................................................... 93 Support to United Nations Peace Missions ............................................... 101 Other Activities in the Region ......................................................... 102 Challenges and Lessons Learned...................................................... 104 Priorities for 2007.................................................................. 104 Rapid Response to Emerging Human Rights Crises .................................... 106 3.3 Supporting the Human Rights Council and Other Human Rights Bodies.................... 110 3.4 Supporting Special Procedures ..................................................... 118 3.5 Thematic Human Rights Challenges ................................................. 124 3.6 Executive Direction, Programme Support and Management.............................. 142 4.0 Humanitarian Funds.................................................... 151 Introduction ............................................................................ 152 United Nations Voluntary Fund for Victims of Torture .............................................. 152 United Nations Voluntary Trust Fund on Contemporary Forms of Slavery ............................... 152 United Nations Voluntary Fund for Indigenous Populations ......................................... 153 5.0 Funding.............................................................. 155 6.0 Financial Accounts for the Year to 31 December 2006......................... 167 Annex I: Organization Chart .............................................. 173 Annex II: List of Abbreviations ............................................ 174 ANNUAL REPORT 2006 3 RA_2007_UNHCHR_DEF:Mise en page 1 18.5.2007 9:37 Page 4 RA_2007_UNHCHR_DEF:Mise en page 1 18.5.2007 9:37 Page 5 Introduction by the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights This Annual Report My Office has also been engaged in pursuing its own offers an overview of a transformation, which we set out in the 2006 Strategic truly momentous year Management Plan (SMP). In contrast to previous OHCHR for human rights. The appeals, for the first time this SMP covered a biennium of highlight was the his- activities, and included staff and activity costs to be toric inauguration, in funded both from the regular budget and from voluntary June, of the Human contributions. Rights Council, the new intergovernmental body As we conclude the first half of an exceptionally challeng- created to replace the ing biennium, this 2006 Annual Report provides an Commission on Human assessment of how OHCHR is evolving. The report focuses Rights. Since its inception, the Council has been engaged on those priorities that have directed and will continue to in institution-building while tackling some of the human guide our action and initiatives, namely strengthening rights crises that erupted or intensified over the second country engagement and thematic expertise as well as part of 2006. It also moved swiftly to adopt the draft the efforts dedicated to further empowering rights-hold- Convention on Enforced Disappearances and the draft ers, fostering partnerships both with civil society and Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, two new within the UN system, and enhancing our leadership role. important standard-setting instruments. I cannot overemphasize the importance of field presences Although “crisis responsiveness” and norm-building will in allowing us to better understand the human rights sit- remain essential components of its work, the Council uation on the ground, directly support authorities and the must also be able to design comprehensive protection UN Country Teams, and reach rights-holders. However, strategies in the face of both simmering strife and field presences are only one of the many ways in which endemic human rights situations. Such vigilance is need- we engage countries on human rights issues. We have ed to ensure that the Council fully discharges its mandate also focused on strengthening our own internal capabili- and meets the expectations of countless and, often, voice- ty by reinforcing geographical desks at headquarters and less victims of human rights abuses. developing new tools and training materials. Crucially, we have created a rapid-response unit, which has already Building on the additional resources and political support been mobilized to establish, support and deploy commis-
Recommended publications
  • Structural Violence Against Children in South Asia © Unicef Rosa 2018
    STRUCTURAL VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN IN SOUTH ASIA © UNICEF ROSA 2018 Cover Photo: Bangladesh, Jamalpur: Children and other community members watching an anti-child marriage drama performed by members of an Adolescent Club. © UNICEF/South Asia 2016/Bronstein The material in this report has been commissioned by the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) regional office in South Asia. UNICEF accepts no responsibility for errors. The designations in this work do not imply an opinion on the legal status of any country or territory, or of its authorities, or the delimitation of frontiers. Permission to copy, disseminate or otherwise use information from this publication is granted so long as appropriate acknowledgement is given. The suggested citation is: United Nations Children’s Fund, Structural Violence against Children in South Asia, UNICEF, Kathmandu, 2018. STRUCTURAL VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN IN SOUTH ASIA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS UNICEF would like to acknowledge Parveen from the University of Sheffield, Drs. Taveeshi Gupta with Fiona Samuels Ramya Subrahmanian of Know Violence in for their work in developing this report. The Childhood, and Enakshi Ganguly Thukral report was prepared under the guidance of of HAQ (Centre for Child Rights India). Kendra Gregson with Sheeba Harma of the From UNICEF, staff members representing United Nations Children's Fund Regional the fields of child protection, gender Office in South Asia. and research, provided important inputs informed by specific South Asia country This report benefited from the contribution contexts, programming and current violence of a distinguished reference group: research. In particular, from UNICEF we Susan Bissell of the Global Partnership would like to thank: Ann Rosemary Arnott, to End Violence against Children, Ingrid Roshni Basu, Ramiz Behbudov, Sarah Fitzgerald of United Nations Population Coleman, Shreyasi Jha, Aniruddha Kulkarni, Fund Asia and the Pacific region, Shireen Mary Catherine Maternowska and Eri Jejeebhoy of the Population Council, Ali Mathers Suzuki.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis of the Amazon Basin.Pdf
    Aplicación en tonalidad gris REGIONAL TRANSBOUNDARY Aplicación en fundo colorido DIAGNOSTIC4 ANALYSIS OF THE AMAZON BASIN TDA REGIONAL TRANSBOUNDARY DIAGNOSTIC ANALYSIS OF THE AMAZON BASIN - TDA 1st Edition Edited by OTCA Brasilia, 2018 Permanent Secretariat- Amazon Cooperation Treaty Organization (PS / ACTO) Secretary General María Jacqueline Mendoza Ortega Executive Director César De las Casas Díaz Administrative Director Antonio Matamoros Coordinator of Environment Theresa Castillion- Elder Coordinator of Indigenous Affairs Sharon Austin Coordinator of Climate Change and Sustainable Development Carlos Aragón Coordinator of Science, Technology and Education Roberto Sánchez Saravia Coordinator of Health Luis Francisco Sánchez Otero Special thanks to Robby Ramlakhan, former Secretary General of ACTO and Mauricio Dorfler, former Executive Director of ACTO Address SHIS QI 05, Conjunto 16, Casa 21, Lago Sul CEP: 71615-160 Brasilia - DF, Brazil T: + (55 61) 3248 4119 | F: + (55 61) 3248-4238 www.otca-oficial.info © ACTO 2018 Reproduction is allowed by quoting the source. United Nations Environment Programme, Washington, D.C. Task Manager: Isabelle Van der Beck GEF Amazon Project - Water Resources and Climate Change (ACTO, Brasilia) Regional Coordinator: Maria Apostolova Scientific Advisor: Dr. Norbert Fenzl Communications Specialist - Editorial Production: Maria Eugenia Corvalán Financial and Administrative Officer: Nilson Nogueira Administrative Assistant: Marli Coriolano More information: http://gefamazonas.otca.info Photographic credits Archives ACTO and GEF Amazon Project DUODESIGN-Shutterstock stock photos Rui Faquini Rui Faquini, Image Bank, ANA-Brazil Marcus Fuckner, Image Bank, ANA-Brazil Cover photo: OTCA Back Cover photo: Filipe Frazao / Shutterstock – DUODESIGN A532 Regional Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis of the Amazon Basin – TDA/ACTO GEF Amazon Project – Brasilia, DF, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Council of the European Union
    ISSN 1680-9742 QC-AA-05-001-EN-C EN EN COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION GENERAL SECRETARIAT European Union - Union European EU Annual Report This, the seventh EU Annual Report on Human Rights, records the actions and policies undertaken by the EU between 1 July 2004 and 30 on Human Rights June 2005 in pursuit of its goals to promote universal respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. While not an exhaustive account, it Rights-2005 onHuman Annual Report highlights human rights issues that have given cause for concern and what the EU has done to address these, both within the Union and outside it. 2005 EU Annual Report on Human Rights 2005 EU Annual Report on Human Rights, adopted by the Council on 3 October 2005. For further information, please contact the Press, Communication and Protocol Division at the following address: General Secretariat of the Council Rue de la Loi 175 B-1048 Brussels Fax: +32 (0)2 235 49 77 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://ue.eu.int Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this edition. A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu.int). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2005 ISBN 92-824-3179-7 ISSN 1680-9742 © European Communities, 2005 Reproduction is authorised, except for commercial purposes , provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Belgium 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface................................................................................................................................................................5 1. Introduction..............................................................................................................................................7 2. Developments within the EU ...................................................................................................................8 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Strategy Paper Nepal 2007-2013
    NEPAL Country Strategy Paper 2007 – 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................... 1 1. OVERVIEW OF COOPERATION AND POLICY DIALOGUE, COMPLEMENTARITY AND CONSISTENCY............................................................... 2 1.1 OVERVIEW OF PAST AND PRESENT EC COOPERATION (LESSONS LEARNED).................................... 2 1.2 INFORMATION ON THE PROGRAMMES OF OTHER DONORS.............................................................. 4 1.3 STATE OF POLITICAL DIALOGUE BETWEEN THE DONORS AND NEPAL ............................................ 4 1.4 ANALYSIS OF POLICY COHERENCE FOR DEVELOPMENT ................................................................... 4 2. THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION’S RESPONSE STRATEGY.............................. 5 2.1 JUSTIFICATION OF THE CHOICE OF THE FOCAL SECTORS.................................................................. 5 2.3 IMPLEMENTATION: THE WORK PROGRAMME .................................................................................... 7 ANNEXES ..........................................................................................................................10 ANNEX I: FRAMEWORK OF RELATIONS BETWEEN THE EC AND NEPAL......11 ANNEX II: COUNTRY DIAGNOSIS...............................................................................14 1. ANALYSIS OF THE POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, SOCIAL, AND ENVIRONMENTAL SITUATION ................ 14 1.1 Political situation .........................................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutionalism in an Insurgent State: Plurality and the Rule of Law in Bolivia
    Constitutionalism in an insurgent state: plurality and the rule of law in Bolivia Author: John-Andrew McNeish (Christian Michelsen Institute/University of Bergen) [email protected] Abstract In this paper, I aim to questions the significance of recent efforts to create a new constitution in Bolivia for anthropological ideas about legal pluralism. The paper focuses specifically on the significance of recent constitutional processes for Bolivia's largely indigent and previously politically marginalised majority indigenous population. As such, the paper considers the manner in which the country's legal plurality has become a part of the national political identity and an integral part of the constitutional process now completed in the country's legal capital. Whilst highlighting the causes and dangers of continued contestation, the paper argues that important lessons about the possibilities for the empowerment of the poor and acceptance of a place for plurality in law can be learned from Bolivia. With its empirical background of insurgency and constitutionalism, but also of indigenous cultures, the case of Bolivia tests the limits of standardised rights based approaches to development and legal empowerment. In this paper attention is drawn to the cultural pliability of ideas about modernity and democracy and the importance of an inter-legal rapprochement between formalized legal norms and alternative legal systems. The paper further highlights the validity of anthropological approaches to the state that highlight the social construction of institutions and structures. Drawing from its empirical base the paper finally aims to critically contribute to recent discussions in "pro-poor" theory, highlighting the problems and possibilities of multi-culturalism and questioning the relevance and applicability of recently proposed ideas of inter-legality.
    [Show full text]
  • Position Paper
    POSITION PAPER 61st Session of the Commission on Human Rights March 14th – April 22nd 2005 FIDH FIDH 17, passage de la Main d’Or Délégation Permanente auprès de l’ONU F-75011 Paris – France 15, Rue des Savoises, tel. +33 (0)1 43 55 25 18 CH-1205 Genève - Suisse fax. +33 (0)1 43 55 18 80 Tel : +4122 700 12 88 [email protected] Fax : +4122 321 54 88 http://www.fidh.org [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] [email protected] FIDH Position paper – 61stsession of the CHR TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 INTRODUCTION 4 COUNTRY PRIORITIES 7 AFRICA .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Burundi ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Democratic Republic of Congo .................................................................................................. 7 Ivory Coast ................................................................................................................................. 8 Mauritania................................................................................................................................... 9 Sudan/Darfur ............................................................................................................................ 10 Togo.......................................................................................................................................... 11
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights and Poverty Review: Eu Action in Addressing Caste-Based Discrimination"
    DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES OF THE UNION DIRECTORATE B POLICY DEPARTMENT BRIEFING "A HUMAN RIGHTS AND POVERTY REVIEW: EU ACTION IN ADDRESSING CASTE-BASED DISCRIMINATION" Abstract Caste-based discrimination is a serious human rights violation, negatively affecting political, economic, social, cultural and civil rights of approximately 260 million people worldwide. The European Union is committed to the promotion of human rights within the EU and in its external relations. This brief aims to assess to what extent the EU has integrated the fight against caste-based discrimination in its external relations. Light is shed on the specific situations in Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan and Yemen and the European Union’s actions to address caste-based discrimination in these countries. Based on the analysis, the briefing elaborates recommendations on how the EU can mainstream the fight against caste-based discrimination into policies, strategies and programmes as well as dialogues with caste-affected countries. Legal realities and options for addressing discrimination vary between the partner countries. In order to mainstream the fight against caste-based discrimination, the EU, and the EEAS in particular, should utilize all options with regard to that country, including association agreements as well as partnership and cooperation agreements. Regarding countries that will not receive bilateral aid, the focus should be put on dialogues to address caste-based discrimination. Lessons on mainstreaming can be gained from the European Union’s experience in mainstreaming human rights. EXPO/B/DEVE/FWC/2009-01/Lot5/33 February 2013 PE 433.805 EN Policy Department DG External Policies This briefing was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Development.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded 09/29/21 10:01 AM UTC JANUARY 2013 S E I L E R E T a L
    130 JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY VOLUME 52 Climate Variability and Trends in Bolivia CHRISTIAN SEILER Earth System Science and Climate Change Group, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen, Netherlands, and Department of Climate Change and Environmental Services, Fundacio´n Amigos de la Naturaleza, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia RONALD W. A. HUTJES Earth System Science and Climate Change Group, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen, Netherlands PAVEL KABAT International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, and Earth System Science and Climate Change Group, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen, Netherlands (Manuscript received 12 April 2012, in final form 17 July 2012) ABSTRACT Climate-related disasters in Bolivia are frequent, severe, and manifold and affect large parts of the pop- ulation, economy, and ecosystems. Potentially amplified through climate change, natural hazards are of growing concern. To better understand these events, homogenized daily observations of temperature (29 stations) and precipitation (68 stations) from 1960 to 2009 were analyzed in this study. The impact of the positive (1) and negative (2) phases of the three climate modes (i) Pacific decadal oscillation (PDO), (ii) El Nin˜ o–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) with El Nin˜ o (EN) and La Nin˜ a (LN) events, and (iii) Antarctic Oscil- lation (AAO) were assessed. Temperatures were found to be higher during PDO(1), EN, and AAO(1)in the Andes. Total amounts of rainfall, as well as the number of extreme events, were higher during PDO(1), EN, and LN in the lowlands. During austral summer [December–February (DJF)], EN led to drier conditions in the Andes with more variable precipitation.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal Country Report BTI 2012
    BTI 2012 | Nepal Country Report Status Index 1-10 4.45 # 98 of 128 Political Transformation 1-10 5.00 # 74 of 128 Economic Transformation 1-10 3.89 # 112 of 128 Management Index 1-10 3.75 # 101 of 128 scale: 1 (lowest) to 10 (highest) score rank trend This report is part of the Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI) 2012. The BTI is a global assessment of transition processes in which the state of democracy and market economy as well as the quality of political management in 128 transformation and developing countries are evaluated. More on the BTI at http://www.bti-project.org Please cite as follows: Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2012 — Nepal Country Report. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2012. © 2012 Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh BTI 2012 | Nepal 2 Key Indicators Population mn. 30.0 HDI 0.458 GDP p.c. $ 1199 Pop. growth1 % p.a. 1.8 HDI rank of 187 157 Gini Index 47.3 Life expectancy years 68 UN Education Index 0.356 Poverty3 % 77.6 Urban population % 18.2 Gender inequality2 0.558 Aid per capita $ 29.1 Sources: The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2011 | UNDP, Human Development Report 2011. Footnotes: (1) Average annual growth rate. (2) Gender Inequality Index (GII). (3) Percentage of population living on less than $2 a day. Executive Summary The high expectations for a new Nepalese political future which followed the 2008 election of a constituent assembly have been cut down by the political reality of power struggle and a policy of blockade. Nepalese politics have since been marked by political turmoil and deadlock.
    [Show full text]
  • SMITA NARULA 78 North Broadway, White Plains, New York 10603, [email protected]
    SMITA NARULA 78 North Broadway, White Plains, New York 10603, [email protected] ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS ELISABETH HAUB SCHOOL OF LAW AT PACE UNIVERSITY White Plains, NY Haub Distinguished Professor of International Law Sept. 2018 - present ▪ Appointed in 2018 as the inaugural Distinguished Haub Chair in International Law to teach in the law school’s internationally renowned and top-ranked environmental law program. ▪ Courses: International Environmental Law; Environmental Justice; Human Rights & the Environment; Property Law. Committees: Appointments Committee; Admissions Committee; Nominating Committee; Environmental Law Program. Research interests: International Human Rights Law; Food Sovereignty & the Right to Food; Indigenous Peoples’ Rights; Environmental Movements; Sustainable Development Goals. Faculty Advisor: Pace International Law Review. ▪ Appointed Co-Director of the Global Center for Environmental Legal Studies in July 2019. Coordinate and supervise Haub Law students’ efforts to draft, submit, appeal and negotiate motions on international environmental law subjects for the International Union for the Conservation of Nature’s World Conservation Congress. HUNTER COLLEGE – CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK New York, NY Distinguished Lecturer & Interim Director 2017 – 2018 Human Rights Program, Roosevelt House Public Policy Institute ▪ Directed interdisciplinary program in human rights for undergraduate students and provided strategic direction for relevant academic, public outreach, and programming efforts. Fostered human rights
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal One Hundred Days After Royal Takeover and Human Rights Crisis Deepens February 1– May 11, 2005
    Nepal One Hundred Days after Royal Takeover and Human Rights Crisis Deepens February 1– May 11, 2005 12 May 2005 Published by Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA) This report is a compilation of contributions coming from different organizations and individuals, both within Nepal and outside. Due to security reasons, the names of the contributors, editors and their institutional affiliations are not disclosed. 2 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 1.0 INTRODUCTION 7 1.1 General overview of the country 7 1.1.1 Socio-political development 7 1.1.2 Human rights regime 9 1.1.2.1 Constitution of the Kingdom of Nepal 1990 9 1.1.2.2 International human rights instruments 12 2.0 GROSS VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS 14 2.1 An overview of the violation of human rights after the royal-military takeover 14 2.1.1 Restrictions on media 15 2.1.2 Restrictions on travel 16 2.1.3 Violations by the Maoists 16 2.2 Constitutional and legal issues 17 2.2.1. Accountability 17 2.2.2 State of emergency 17 2.2.3 Legal standing of Government 19 2.2.4. Suppression of dissent 19 2.3 State of emergency and international obligations 19 2.3.1 Pre-conditions for declaring a state of emergency 20 2.3.2 Notification under ICCPR Article 4 21 2.4 Judiciary and constitutional institutions under trial 22 2.4.1 Royal Commission for Corruption Control (RCCC) 23 2.4.2 Violation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 24 2.4.3 Torture in detention 26 2.4.4 Judicial reluctance to engage in human rights protection 26 2.4.5 Militarization of the governance system
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy Support Through the United Nations
    Democracy Support through the United Nations Report 10/2010 - Evaluation Nepal Case Report COUNTRY CASE STUDY REPORTS This country case study is one of several such reports that are part of an assessment of Norwegian support to democratic development through the United Nations system. These case reports are not independent evaluations of the programmes or projects discussed, but rather studies of both the decisions taken by Norway and the UN to support the particular democratic development process, and the key factors that may explain the results. These studies should thus be seen as working documents for the general evaluation of the Norwegian support. Task Team: Mr. Endre Vigeland, Scanteam, team leader Ms. Ila Sharma, Independent Consultant Peer Reviewer: Mr. Manolo Sánchez, Scanteam Democracy Support through the United Nations Contents 1 Background and Introduction ...................................................... 1 1.1 The Nepal Case Report ............................................................................ 1 2 Country Context ............................................................................ 2 2.1 Caste and Human Rights.......................................................................... 2 2.2 Parliamentary Democracy, Maoist Insurgency, Peace Agreement ............ 2 3 Project Background and Description .......................................... 5 3.1 Capacity Development for the National Human Rights Commission ......... 5 3.2 OHCHR Monitoring Mission ...................................................................
    [Show full text]