DOCSLIB.ORG

POLITICAL SCIENCE Chapter-2 Era of One-Party Dominance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
POLITICAL SCIENCE Chapter-2 Era of One-Party Dominance POLITICAL SCIENCE Chapter-2 Era of One-party Dominance Introduction Political parties are an indispensable part of present-day political system. In modern representative democracy, political party in one form or another is omnipresent in the political process. The phenomenon of party is closely linked with the growth of complexity of political systems in which the notion of political power has come to include the idea of mass public must participate. Challenge of building democracy Democracy was the legacy of Indian national movement. The leaders of newly independent India were deeply committed to the idea of democracy. Our leaders were conscious of the critical role of politics in any democracy. They did not see politics as a problem; they saw it as a way of solving the problem. While competition and power are the two most visible things about politics, the purpose of political activity is and should be deciding and pursuing public interest. The election commission of India was set up in January 1950, Sukumar Sen became the Chief Election Commissioner. Our Constitution was ready and signed on 26 November 1949 and it came into effect on 26 January 1950. Congress dominance in the first three general elections The first three general elections were held in 1952, 1957, and 1962. The 1952 elections saw a large mass of ignorant and illiterate mass responding to elections. This era was characterised by the monopoly of Congress at the Centre along with the existence of smaller opposition parties. Indian National Congress won the first elections with 364 of the 489 seats and finished way ahead of any other challenger. INC win was due to its legacy of the national movement. The Communist party of India that came next in terms of seats won only 16 seats. Even state elections took place after the Lok Sabha elections and there also Congress emerged as winner in all the states except Travancore-Cochin, Madras and Orissa but later in these states also Congress government was formed. In the State assembly elections, the Congress did not get majority in a few cases and one of the most significant was in Kerala where Communist party formed the government in 1957. Likewise in 1962 elections, Congress got over 44.7% votes and over that 73% of the seats. There was a wide gap in the popular vote share and seat share of Congress and other opposition parties. In the second and the third general elections held in 1957 and 1962 respectively Congress maintained the same position in Lok Sabha by winning three-fourth seats. Reasons for Congress dominance in first three elections The Indian National Congress had unique political accomplishments. The principles guided the nation. The Congress dominated the Indian political scenario from 1947 to 1967. The factors responsible for its dominance included: 1. Inheritance of the national movement – The Congress party had inherited the vast and enriched legacy from the national movement. Many leaders who were in the forefront of the freedom struggle were now contesting as Congress candidates in the elections. These leaders had already won the confidence of the people. Congress was seen as a party that brought freedom to the country. 2. Charismatic personality of the Prime Minister – In Jawaharlal Nehru the party had the most popular and charismatic leader in Indian politics. He led the campaign and toured through the country. 3. Well organised party with first off the block advantage – It was a well organised party and had first off the block advantage. By the time the other parties could think of a strategy the Congress had already started its campaign. It had an organisational network down to the local level, which made it a grassroot party well connected to the people. 4. Coalition of all social and economic classes - It was a mass political party bringing into its fold diverse social and economic classes - peasants and industrialist, urban dwellers and villagers, workers and owners, middle, lower and upper classes and castes. 5. Coalition of different ideologies and beliefs - Many ideological groups merged their identities with Congress. It accommodated revolutionists and pacifists, conservatives and radicals, extremists and moderates and right, left and all other shades of the country. 6. Congress performance in the first three elections – The extent of victory of the Congress in the first three general elections was phenomenal. None of the opposition parties could win even a 10th of the number of seats won by Congress. 7. Management of Conflicts and Factions – Because of its coalition like nature Congress avoided taking any extreme position and strike a balance on almost all issues. It successfully accommodated all the factions. Anything that the opposition wanted to say already found a place in Congress. Nature of Congress dominance/ How one-party dominance in India was different from the one-party dominance in other countries? India is not the only country to have experienced the dominance of one party but the dominance of Congress is different from one party dominance elsewhere in the world. In some countries dominance of one party was ensured by compromising democracy. In countries like China, Cuba and Syria the constitution permits only a single party to rule the country. Some others like Egypt, Myanmar, Belarus, etc are effectively one party states due to legal and military measures. In Mexico PRI (Institutional Revolutionary Party) dominated for almost six decades. But during this period most of the times undemocratic means were used by the PRI to win elections. Elections were not free and fair. In contrast to all the above countries Congress exercised dominance totally under democratic conditions. Many parties contested elections in conditions of free and fair elections and yet the Congress managed to win election after election. The roots of this extraordinary success of the Congress party go back to the legacy of freedom struggle, well-knit organisation and adjustment to circumstances. It made the Congress the dominant party in a democratic system as opposed to monopoly of one parties in other states like China, Cuba etc. Communist victory in Kerala In the State assembly elections Congress did not get majority in few states. As early as in 1957, the Congress party had the bitter taste of defeat in Kerala. The Communist Party won the largest number of seats in Kerala legislature. The party won 160 of the 126 seats and had the support of 5 Independents. The Governor invited E.M.S Namboodiripad the leader of the Communist Legislature party to form the ministry. First time in the world, a Communist party government had come to power through democratic elections. The CPI had come to power on the promise of carrying out radical and progressive policy measures. In 1959, the Congress government at the Centre dismissed the Communist government in Kerala under article 356 of the Constitution. This decision became controversial and is said to be the first misuse of the Constitutional provision. Case of Mexico Mexico party named Revolutionary party and later renamed as the Institutional Revolutionary party was founded in 1929, and remained in power for 6 decades. Originally PRI was a mixture of various interests including political and military leaders, labour and peasant organisations and numerous political parties. Over a period of time Plutarco Elias Calles, the founder of PRI was able to capture the organisation and thereby the government. Elections were held regularly and it was PRI which won every time because they manipulated the electoral laws. Elections were often rigged and manipulated by the ruling party. Finally the party lost in the Presidential elections held in 2000 and Mexico is no longer one-party dominated country. Congress as social and ideological coalition Congress had emerged as a pressure group of the intellectuals, professionals and commercial classes in the 20th century. The Congress began as a party dominated by the English speaking upper caste, upper middle class and urban elite. But with every civil disobedience movement it launched, its social base widened. It brought together diverse groups, whose interests were often contradictory. Peasants and industrialists, urban developers and villages, workers and owners, middle, lower and upper classes and castes, all found space in the Congress. Gradually its leadership also expanded beyond the upper caste professionals to agriculture-based leaders with the rural orientation. By the time of independence the Congress was transformed into a rainbow like social coalition broadly representing India’s diversity. Many of these groups merged their identity within the Congress. The Congress was an ideological coalition in the sense that it accommodated revolutionary and pacifist, conservative and radical, extremist and moderate and the right, left and all shades of the Centre. The Congress was a platform for numerous groups, interests and even political parties to take part in the national movement. Tolerance and management of factions by the Congress The coalition-like character of the Congress gave it an unusual strength. The advantages of the coalition are: Firstly, coalition accommodates all those who join it. Therefore, it has to avoid any extreme position and strike a balance on almost all issues. Compromise and inclusiveness are the hallmarks of a coalition which puts the opposition in a difficulty. In a party that has the nature of coalition there is a greater tolerance of internal differences and ambitions of various groups and leaders are accommodated. The Congress did both these things during the freedom struggle and continued doing this even after independence. What are Factions? The various groups inside the party are called factions. The coalition nature of the Congress party tolerated and in fact encourage various factions. Why factions added strength to Congress? Instead of being a weakness, internal factionalism became a strength of the Congress.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Telangana State Election Commission
    TELANGANA STATE ELECTION COMMISSION Recognized National Political Parties Sl. Symbols in Symbols Name of the Political Party No. English / Telugu Reserved Elephant 1 Bahujan Samaj Party ఏనుగు Lotus 2 Bharatiya Janata Party కమలం Ears of Corn & Sickle 3 Communist Party of India కంకి కొడవ젿 Hammer, Sickle & Star 4 Communist Party of India (Marxist) సుత్తి కొడవ젿 నక్షత్రం Hand 5 Indian National Congress చెయ్యి Clock 6 Nationalist Congress Party గడియారము Recognized State Parties in the State of Telangana Sl. Symbols in Name of the Party Symbols Reserved No. English / Telugu All India Majlis-E-Ittehadul- Kite 1 Muslimeen గా젿 పటం Car 2 Telangana Rastra Samithi కారు Bicycle 3 Telugu Desam Party స ైకిలు Yuvajana Sramika Rythu Ceiling Fan 4 Congress Party పంఖా Recognised State Parties in other States Sl. Symbols in Symbols Name of the Political Party No. English / Telugu Reserved Two Leaves All India Anna Dravida Munnetra 1 Kazhagam ర ండు ఆకులు Lion 2 All India Forward Bloc స ంహము A Lady Farmer 3 Janata Dal (Secular) Carrying Paddy వరి 롋పుతో ఉనన మహిళ Arrow 4 Janata Dal (United) బాణము Hand Pump 5 Rastriya Lok Dal చేత్త పంపు Banyan Tree 6 Samajwadi Party మరిి చెటటు Registered Political Parties with reserved symbol - NIL - TELANGANA STATE ELECTION COMMISSION Registered Political Parties without Reserved Symbol Sl. No. Name of the Political Party 1 All India Stree Shakthi Party 2 Ambedkar National Congress 3 Bahujan Samj Party (Ambedkar – Phule) 4 BC United Front Party 5 Bharateeya Bhahujana Prajarajyam 6 Bharat Labour Party 7 Bharat Janalok Party 8
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Preview
    2 C. Rajagopalachari 1 An Illustrious Life Great statesman and thinker, Rajagopalachari was born in Thorapalli in the then Salem district and was educated in Central College, Bangalore and Presidency College, Madras. Chakravarthi Rajagopalachari (10 December 1878 - 25 December 1972), informally called Rajaji or C.R., was an eminent lawyer, independence activist, politician, writer, statesman and leader of the Indian National Congress who served as the last Governor General of India. He served as the Chief Minister or Premier of the Madras Presidency, Governor of West Bengal, Minister for Home Affairs of the Indian Union and Chief Minister of Madras state. He was the founder of the Swatantra Party and the first recipient of India’s highest civilian award, the Bharat Ratna. Rajaji vehemently opposed the usage of nuclear weapons and was a proponent of world peace and disarmament. He was also nicknamed the Mango of Salem. In 1900 he started a prosperous legal practise. He entered politics and was a member and later President of Salem municipality. He joined the Indian National Congress and participated in the agitations against the Rowlatt Act, the Non-cooperation Movement, the Vaikom Satyagraha and the Civil Disobedience Movement. In 1930, he led the Vedaranyam Salt Satyagraha in response to the Dandi March and courted imprisonment. In 1937, Rajaji was elected Chief Minister or Premier An Illustrious Life 3 of Madras Presidency and served till 1940, when he resigned due to Britain’s declaration of war against Germany. He advocated cooperation over Britain’s war effort and opposed the Quit India Movement. He favoured talks with Jinnah and the Muslim League and proposed what later came to be known as the “C.
    [Show full text]
  • Growing Cleavages in India? Evidence from the Changing Structure of Electorates, 1962-2014
    WID.world WORKING PAPER N° 2019/05 Growing Cleavages in India? Evidence from the Changing Structure of Electorates, 1962-2014 Abhijit Banerjee Amory Gethin Thomas Piketty March 2019 Growing Cleavages in India? Evidence from the Changing Structure of Electorates, 1962-2014 Abhijit Banerjee, Amory Gethin, Thomas Piketty* January 16, 2019 Abstract This paper combines surveys, election results and social spending data to document the long-run evolution of political cleavages in India. From a dominant- party system featuring the Indian National Congress as the main actor of the mediation of political conflicts, Indian politics have gradually come to include a number of smaller regionalist parties and, more recently, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). These changes coincide with the rise of religious divisions and the persistence of strong caste-based cleavages, while education, income and occupation play little role (controlling for caste) in determining voters’ choices. We find no evidence that India’s new party system has been associated with changes in social policy. While BJP-led states are generally characterized by a smaller social sector, switching to a party representing upper castes or upper classes has no significant effect on social spending. We interpret this as evidence that voters seem to be less driven by straightforward economic interests than by sectarian interests and cultural priorities. In India, as in many Western democracies, political conflicts have become increasingly focused on identity and religious-ethnic conflicts
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Activities of Surendranath Dwivedy
    Odisha Review December - 2015 Parliamentary Activities of Surendranath Dwivedy Jugal Kishore Hota Among the important leaders of India, Surendra When he was a student of Cuttack Collegiate Nath Dwibedy occupies a significant position for School, the arrest of Pandit Nehru spread like his invaluable contributions as a dedicated freedom wild fire. He came forward with his friends and fighter, born socialist, true democrat, veteran protested the arrest of Nehru and himself was parliamentarian and a real friend of the poor. As arrested in 1930. That incident suddenly changed a parliamentarian Surendra Nath Dwibedy had the course of his life. He remained in jail for five great reputation because he was committed to months and gave farewell to his student career value-based politics. He got an opportunity to forever. By the call of Gandhi he became a Swaraj work with three Prime Ministers of India, namely Sainik and instead of going to school went to Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, Lal Bahadur Sastri and Satyagraha Ashram of Gopabandhu Choudhury. Mrs. Indira Gandhi. All the three Prime Ministers During his imprisonment period from 1930-33, had great respect for the veteran leader who was he got an opportunity to read “Mother” of Maxim extremely fearless and uncompromising in his Gorky. This book brought a radical change in the stand as a member of Parliament. life of Dwivedy. He became a socialist and said, Born in an humble family on 11th Feb. “Mother was an invaluable asset for me”3 1913 at Khandasahi 1 village of un-divided The entire life of S.N.
    [Show full text]
  • Chap 2 PF.Indd
    Credit: Shankar I ts chptr… The challenge of nation-building, covered in the last chapter, was This famous sketch accompanied by the challenge of instituting democratic politics. Thus, by Shankar appeared electoral competition among political parties began immediately after on the cover of his collection Don’t Spare Independence. In this chapter, we look at the first decade of electoral Me, Shankar. The politics in order to understand original sketch was • the establishment of a system of free and fair elections; drawn in the context of India’s China policy. But • the domination of the Congress party in the years immediately this cartoon captures after Independence; and the dual role of the Congress during the era • the emergence of opposition parties and their policies. of one-party dominance. 2021–22 chapter 2 era of one-party dominance Challenge of building democracy You now have an idea of the difficult circumstances in which independent India was born. You have read about the serious challenge of nation-building that confronted the country right in the beginning. Faced with such serious challenges, leaders in many other countries of the world decided that their country could not afford to have democracy. They said that national unity was their first priority and that democracy will introduce differences and conflicts. In India,…. Therefore many of the countries that gained freedom from colonialism …hero-worship, plays a part “ experienced non-democratic rule. It took various forms: nominal in its politics unequalled democracy but effective control by one leader, one party rule or direct in magnitude by the part army rule.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter V I. Introduction the Formal Decision to Establish the Swatantra
    117 Chapter V ---c. RAJAGOPALACHARI-- AND THE----- SWATANTRA PARTY I. -Introduction---- The formal decision to establish the swatantra Party was made public in Hadras on June 4, 19 59. Only in the narrowest sense, however, does this tell anything about its birth. ·rhe date of conception was uncertain, although the 1 period of gestation is known to have been long. However, before starting tot race its birth ano growth and the ideological position of C.k<.ajagopalachari within the Swatantra Party, let us describe how c.Rajagopalachar~ a Congress stalwart over the decades, was drawn to the new party and became its father figur:e. After Independence, C.Rajagopalachari held several portfolios in the Interim Government. He became the Governor of west Bengal in 1947-48, the Governor-General of India in 1948-50, a Minister \-vi thout Port folio and the Home Minister in Jawaharlal Rehru • s Cabinet and the Chief Minister of the Madras Presidency in 1952-54. But most of these official positions of c.aajagopalachari were of little official power. c.Raja<.J:')pala­ chari's self-righteousness, his opposition to the 1942, Quit India Movement, his lenient attitude towatds the Communists and the MJ.slim League during the World war II had antagonized a large section of the Congress rank and file towards him. In fact, his post-war and post-Independent 148 official positions were mostly dependent on Jawaharlal Nehru 1 s sympathetic attitude towards him. But let us analyse 'Why Jawaharlal Nehru leaned towards C.Rajagopalachari during this period, since he (C.Rajagapalachari) was a rabid Congress rightist during the 1930's, and about who~ Jawaharlal Nehru once exclaimed •••• ' As for c.Raj agopalachari •••• is there a ) 2 more dangerous person in all India'? During this perio~ there was both an.increasing alienation and weakening of the left-wing elements outside the Congress and radical forces within the Congress itself.
    [Show full text]
  • India Freedom Fighters' Organisation
    A Guide to the Microfiche Edition of Political Pamphlets from the Indian Subcontinent Part 5: Political Parties, Special Interest Groups, and Indian Internal Politics UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF AMERICA A Guide to the Microfiche Edition of POLITICAL PAMPHLETS FROM THE INDIAN SUBCONTINENT PART 5: POLITICAL PARTIES, SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS, AND INDIAN INTERNAL POLITICS Editorial Adviser Granville Austin Guide compiled by Daniel Lewis A microfiche project of UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF AMERICA An Imprint of CIS 4520 East-West Highway • Bethesda, MD 20814-3389 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Indian political pamphlets [microform] microfiche Accompanied by printed guide. Includes bibliographical references. Content: pt. 1. Political Parties and Special Interest Groups—pt. 2. Indian Internal Politics—[etc.]—pt. 5. Political Parties, Special Interest Groups, and Indian Internal Politics ISBN 1-55655-829-5 (microfiche) 1. Political parties—India. I. UPA Academic Editions (Firm) JQ298.A1 I527 2000 <MicRR> 324.254—dc20 89-70560 CIP Copyright © 2000 by University Publications of America. All rights reserved. ISBN 1-55655-829-5. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................................. vii Source Note ............................................................................................................................. xi Reference Bibliography Series 1. Political Parties and Special Interest Groups Organization Accession #
    [Show full text]
  • Bharatiya Jana Sangh
    BHARATIYA JAKA SANGHj THE DEVELOPMENT OF A POLITICAL PARTI IN INDIA by - PRABHA SHARMA B.A. , Isabella Thoburn College, University of Lucknow, 19^5 A MASTER'S THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS Department of Political Science KANSAS STATE UTIIVSRSITI Kanha 11 an , Kansas 1969 Approved by: Ka.ior Professor ^ ii &-1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to express my sincere appreciation to my Major Advisor Dr. William L. Richter for his invaluable guidance that has brought this paper to completion. I am grateful to Dr. Micheal W. Suleiman and Dr. E. Terrence Jones, members of the Advisory Committee for their careful perusal of this thesis and suggestions. I would like to acknowledge the consideration of Dr. William W. Boyer, Dr. Albert B. Franklin, and other Faculty members and students of the Department of Political Science at Kansas State University with whom it has been a pleasure to associate. I am also indebted to the members of the South Asia Library Staff at the University of Pennsylvania who were most helpful during my research there in the Spring of 1968. Affectionate thanks are due to my husband Govind, who gave freely of his time and was throughout this writing a source of great encouragement and help. For the typing of the manuscript in its various stages I am grateful to Mrs. Cheryl Smith, Mrs. Bonnie McCurdy, and Mrs. Karen Area. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. HISTORICAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE JANA SANGH 10 III. PARTI ORGANIZATION 21 IV. PARTY IDEOLOGY 35 a.
    [Show full text]
  • Books by Socialist Leaders
    BBBooksBooks By andandand About Prominent Indian Socialist Leaders (Compiled by Qurban Ali) Contents ACHARYA NARENDRA DEVA............................................................................................................... 3 JAYPRAKASH NARAYAN ..................................................................................................................... 7 PURSHOTTAM TRICUMDAS ............................................................................................................. 11 Dr. Sampurnanand .......................................................................................................................... 12 RAMMANOHAR LOHIA .................................................................................................................... 15 NARAYAN GANESH (N G) GORAY ..................................................................................................... 18 KAMALADEVI CHATTOPADHYAY ...................................................................................................... 19 SHRIDHAR MAHADEV JOSHI (SM) .................................................................................................... 22 ACHYUT PATWARDHAN ................................................................................................................... 23 YUSUF JAFFAR MEHARALLY ............................................................................................................. 24 ASOKA (ASHOK) MEHTA .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Strides Cover
    A STUDENTS' JOURNAL OF SHRI RAM COLLEGE OF COMMERCE VOLUME 1 ISSUE 1 2016-17 STRIDES A STUDENTS' JOURNAL OF SHRI RAM COLLEGE OF COMMERCE Is China heading towards the next financial crisis? A case study of the parallels between the pre-crisis US Economy and Chinese Economy Madhurima Khosla Structural Changes in The Russian Economy Parth Verma & Prajwal Gupta Aftermath of Demonetization in India Arshnoor The Ripple Effect of a Strike Shiv Kumar Bansal PIIGS: Same Same Yet Different Akanksha Burman Internal Migration in India: Causes and Consequences Bipul Verma Bolstering Talent Acquisition- Concept of Employer Branding Pashmina Uberoi The Effect of Demonetisation on Inflation in India Sakshi Kumari Demographic Dividend of India- Is it Just a Mirage? Deepika UBI: Old Wine in a Fancy Bottle Shivangi Gupta Spectrum of Indian Politics Bharatendu Verma The Trump Card Arshya Aggarwal To be or Not to be? Sanchie Shroff STRIDES A STUDENTS’ JOURNAL OF SHRI RAM COLLEGE OF COMMERCE Volume 1 Issue 1 2016-17 PATRON Shri Ajay S. Shriram Chairman, Governing Body PRINCIPAL (Officiating) Dr. R.P. Rustagi EDITOR Dr. Santosh Kumari Ph.D., M.Phil., M.Com., M.A. Educational Leadership and Management (University of Nottingham, England, United Kingdom) Assistant Professor Department of Commerce Shri Ram College of Commerce University of Delhi Delhi-110007 India e-mail: [email protected] COMMITTEE ON PUBLICATION ETHICS (COPE) Dr. R. P. Rustagi Chairman Dr. Santosh Kumari Editor of STRIDES and Convener of COPE Mr. S. K. Aggarwal Senior-most Teacher in the College Dr. Anil Kumar Coordinator, Global Business Operations, SRCC Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Praja—Socialist Merger
    ( Established January 1949 ) August 30, 1952 Volume IV—No. 35 Eight annas EDITORIALS Praja-Socialist Merger 885 Praja—Socialist Merger Coal Conservation 886 WEEKLY NOTES T has been remarked that in India, as in many other south-east Asian To Protect Tanjore Tenants— I countries, the light for power is between Left and Further Left, Solvency for Sterling Area— This is the probable pattern of the struggle for power not only in Employment, Up or Down?— this region, but throughout the world. Communists claim credit for Where Has Cloth Gone?— the changed political complexion of the major political contestants in Hindusthan Motors to Manu­ any country. About the gradual transformation in the political judg­ facture Diesel Engines—Trade ment of rival political parties, there is no doubt. Some theoreticians With Western Germany 888 have, however, elaborated the thesis that this is the inevitable outcome of social democracy. Today the Tory Party in Britain is as much LETTERS TO THE EDITOR committed to Welfare State as the Labour Party. It is not without The Trio 891 significance that the Republican Party in America has chosen Mr Eisen­ TCA 891 hower, in preference to Senator Taft, as its presidential nominee. In OUR DELHI LETTER the last two years there may have been a shift from Left to Centre A Bold New Programme 892 in the Western European countries. But this has, and it is not without significance, coincided with a simultaneous shift from Right to Centre. FROM THE LONDON END There will be elections next year in many of the. Western European US Military Bases in Britain 893 countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Era of One Party Dominance Learning Sheet Solution 8 Questions For
    Era of One Party Dominance Learning Sheet Solution 8 Questions for Practice 1. Evaluate the factors that helped the Congress to continue to dominate the Indian political scenario for almost three decades after independence. Ans: The Congress party succeeded in maintaining its dominance until 1967 due to the following reasons: The Congress party was supported by elites, educated business classes and middle classes people. It also got support from peasants because of its socialist nature. In this way had support from every section of society. It had many popular faces like Jawaharlal Nehru, C Rajgopalachari, Vallabhbhai Patel etc. Moreover, Jawaharlal Nehru was charismatic and a very popular leader. The popularity of these Congress leaders had a great impact over the face of Congress in General Elections. Congress worked at the upper level as well as at the grass root level. Congress was popularised due to the participation in the civil disobedience movement. Its role in the National Movement for freedom had been a major reason for its success in First three General Elections. During the period of Nehru, Congress attained mass popularity, but the powerful narrow elite of Congress continued to benefit from the low level of political consciousness of the electorate. The traditional localities made Congress, a one-party dominance. 2. Which characteristics made the Congress an ideological coalition during the freedom movement of India? Ans: It brought together diverse groups, whose interests were often contradictory. Peasants and industrialists, urban dwellers and villagers, workers and owners, middle, lower, upper classes and castes, all found space in the congress. It accommodated the revolutionary and pacifist, conservatives and radical, extremist and moderate and the right, left and all shades of the centre.
    [Show full text]