Бюллетень Дальневосточного The Bulletin of the Russian малакологического общества Far East Malacological Society 2012, вып. 15/16, с. 87–116 2012, vol. 15/16, pp. 87–116

Species names of J.-R. Bourguignat and their application in current of fresh-water gastropods of the Russian fauna T.Ya. Sitnikova1, P.V. Kijashko2, A.V. Sysoev3 1Limnological Institute, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Irkutsk 664033, Russia e-mail: [email protected] 2Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St.-Petersburg 199034, Russia 3Zoological Museum, Moscow State University, Moscow 125009, Russia

Twenty two of gastropods described by French malacologist J.-R. Bourguignat and recognized as valid in the fauna of Russia and the former USSR are illustrated with the type specimens and recently collected material. Each species is provided with data on (1) syntypes, or, at their absence, specimens iden- tified by Bourguignat; (2) a brief history of the name application as mentioned in the Russian literature; (3) published records of the species distribution; (4) taxonomic remarks. It appears that many species of the Russian fauna were erroneously identified due to the lack of access to the type material. Key words: J.-R. Bourguignat, , fresh-water species, type material, taxonomy, Russian fauna.

Видовые названия Ж.-Р. Бургинья и их использование в современной систематике пресноводных брюхоногих моллюсков фауны России Т.Я. Ситникова1, П.В. Кияшко2, А.В. Сысоев3 1Лимнологический институт СО РАН, Иркутск 664033, Россия e-mail: [email protected] 2Зоологический институт РАН, С.-Петербург 199034, Россия 3Зоологический музей МГУ, Москва 125009, Россия

Для двадцати двух видов брюхоногих моллюсков, описанных французским малакологом Ж.-Р. Бургинья и признанных валидными в фауне России и бывшего СССР, приведены иллюстрации типовых и собранных впоследствие с указанной территории экземпляров. Для каждого вида при- ведены данные по (1) синтипам или, при их отсутствии, экземплярам, идентицифированным самим Бургинья; (2) краткой истории использования видовых названий в русской литературе; (3) опубли- кованным находкам и географическому распространению; (4) таксономические замечания. Пока- зано, что многие виды фауны России были ошибочно определены вследствие отсутствия доступа к типовым материалам. Ключевые слова: Ж.-Р. Бургинья, брюхоногие моллюские, пресноводные воды, типовой материал, фауна России.

87 Jules-René Bourguignat was at any descriptions of new species. It is known rate an eminent European malacologist; that his massive descriptions of new spe- even though his taxonomic heritage has cies, irrespective of being well-grounded or been controversially appraised by subse- not, were universally criticized by various quent scholars (see a review in: [Dance, authors who believed that the gastropod 1970]). Hundreds and hundreds of conti- fauna of Europe in a broad sense (to the nental species described by Bourguignat Urals and even farther) has been long have been synonymized and then retrieved ago described completely. Starobogatov from synonymy and vice versa, although mostly used those names of Bourguignat there seems to be a trend of recognition which were accompanied by good quality of species names as valid, as concerning illustrations. fresh-water gastropod species described Needless to say, Starobogatov and his within the framework of the «nouvelle disciples had no access (and regretfully école» (that is, by Bourguignat and his could not have it at the time of the «iron disciples) [Bouchet, 2002]. curtain») to the type material of Bourguig- Bourguignat mostly dealt with faunas nat. Thus, there could be some doubts in quite distant from Russia. Naturally, the the reasons for identification of the Rus- comprehensive review of Russian fresh- sian fauna species as those described by water fauna of the 1950th [Shadin, 1952] Bourguignat, especially because the latters lists only two Bourguignat’s species as have been often described from localities valid: Choanomphalus amauronius Bour- quite distant from what is currently treated guignat, 1860 (simply because it has been as the species range in Russia. described from Lake Baikal) and Hydro- Recently, the senior author happened bia longiscata (Bourguignat, 1856) (with to examine the Bourguignat collection at a query for Central Asian localities). the Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle, Geneva However, with the onset of a new era of (MHNG) and to photograph the species re- Russian fresh-water malacology asso- levant to the Russian fauna. Therefore, the ciated with Ya.I. Starobogatov and his goal of the present paper was to illustrate school, the species names of Bourguig- these types together with shells identified nat became being progressively applied as Bourguignat’s species by Starobogatov to species of the Russian fauna, having and/or his disciples and mostly stored in resulted in recognition of more than 30 the Zoological Institute of Russian Aca- of Bourguignat’s species treated as valid demy of Sciences, St.-Petersburg (ZIN). [Kantor, Sysoev, 2005]. We hope that this publication will provide One reason of using the names of a more firm basis for the formal naming of Bourguignat by Starobogatov was to avoid species of the Russian fresh-water fauna.

Taxonomic account Family Neritidae Rafinesque, 1815 Theodoxus fluviatilis var. subthermalis Bourguig- nat – Issel, 1865: 22–23. Theodoxus subthermalis Type localit y. Not stated (Lac de (Bourguignat in Issel, 1865) Paleostomi, près de Poti, Georgie – loca- Fig. 1 A–F lity of syntypes).

88 T y p e s. 7 syntypes, MHNG, Bour- as Th. subthermalis found along eastern guignat collection, No. 11737. coast of the Black and Azov seas should H i s t o r y of the name applica t i o n . be described as a new species, whereas Theodoxus subthermalis – Shadin, 1952 (key the validity of Th. subthermalis and its to identification, shell description, distribution); – Anistratenko, 1998 (key to identification, actual range require additional studies. illustrations, distribution); It can appear that true Th. subthermalis – Anistratenko et al., 1999 (shell description, is a local endemic of western maritime key to identification, distribution); Georgia. – Starobogatov et al., 2004 (key to identifica- tion, distribution); Family Bellamyidae Rohrbach, 1937 – Yildirim et al., 2006 (distribution); – Anistratenko et al., 2008 (distribution); Amuropaludina chloantha – Kantor, Sysoev, 2005; Kantor et al., 2009 (Bourguignat, 1860) (information about types, type locality and gene- ral distribution). Fig. 1G–I General distributio n. Lakes Vivipara chloantha Bourguignat, 1860b: 534, of the Caucasus (Transcaucasia) and the pl. 24, figs. 5–7. eastern coast of the Black and Azov seas; Type localit y. «Divers affluents Iran, possibly Turkey. de l’Amour moyen» [Far East of Russia]. R e m a r k s. Taxonomic history of T y p e s. 1 syntype, MHNG, Bour- the species in the Russian fauna is un- guignat collection, No. 4734. clear. Shadin was probably the first who History of the name application . introduced this species name to our fauna. Amuropaludina chloanta – Moskvicheva, Shadin’s [1952] concept was not illustra- 1979 (shell description, distribution); ted. However, it is well seen (Fig. 1) that – Bogatov, Zatrawkin, 1990 (shell descrip- tion, key to identification, ecology, distribution); the shells regarded to be that species in – Prozorova, 2000 (distribution in Lake the ZIN collection (Shadins’s identifica- Khanka drainage); tion) differ from the syntypes in the shell – Starobogatov et al., 2004 (key to identifica- shape. Moreover, the next published re- tion, distribution); cord [Anistratenko, 1998] refers also to – Kantor, Sysoev, 2005; Kantor et al., 2009 a different species, as can be seen from (information about the types, type locality and a comparison of our Fig. 1A, B and Anis- general distribution). tratenko’s [1998, pl. 1, fig. 5a, b] illustra- General distributio n. Amur tion which shows a shell rather squarish basin, excluding upper part of Zeya basin; in the frontal plane, not rhomboidal as in in rivers and running lakes. the syntypes of subthermalis. Anistraten- R e m a r k s. Specimens of A. chloanta ko [1998], Anistratenko et al. [1999] identified by I. Moskvicheva and stored in and Starobogatov et al. [2004] adopt the the ZIN (Fig. 1I) correspond well to the main distinguishing character of the spe- syntype of this species in the shell shape. cies as being the width of aperture plus The syntype looks as immature specimen columellar shield not exceeding 0.64 with thin aperture edges, narrow umbili- of the shell width. However, this index cus, and remained embryonal shell, which is more than 0.7 in the syntypes of the is not characteristic of adult, mature speci- species. Probably, specimens regarded mens of Amuropaludina.

89 90 Amuropaludina pachya Family (Bourguignat, 1860) H. et A. Adams, 1854 Fig. 1J–M berlani Vivipara pachya Bourguignat, 1860b: 532–533, (Bourguignat, 1884) pl. 24, figs. 1–2. Fig. 2A–C Type localit y. «Le flueve Amo- (Esperiana) berlani Bourguignat, 1884: ur» [Far East of Russia]. 34–35. T y p e s. 1 syntype, MHNG, Bour- Type localit y. «Le Danube à guignat collection, No. 4741. Ibraila; la Save entre Agram et Sissek» History of the name applicatio n . [Danube at Braila, Romania; Sava River Amuropaludina pachya – Moskvicheva, between Zagreb and Sisak, Croatia]. 1979 (shell description, distribution); T y p e s. 2 syntypes, MHNG, Bour- – Bogatov, Zatrawkin, 1990 (shell descrip- tion, ecology, distribution); guignat collection, Nos. 11044, 11045. – Prozorova, 2000 (distribution in Khanka History of the name application . Lake drainage); Fagotia (Dneprifagotia) berlani – Starobo- – Starobogatov et al., 2004 (key to identifica- gatov et al., 1992 (shell morphology, distri- tion, distribution); bution); – Kantor, Sysoev, 2005; Kantor et al., 2009 – Anistratenko, 1998 (key to identification, (information about the types, type locality and distribution); general distribution). – Pershko, 2003 (shell morphology); – Starobogatov et al., 2004 (key to identifica- General distributio n. Central tion, distribution); and lower Amur basin, in rivers and run- – Kantor, Sysoev, 2005; Kantor et al., 2009 ning lakes. (information about the types, type locality and R e m a r k s. It is difficult to compare general distribution); the syntype with other specimens of this – Pershko, 2011 (karyology, distribution). species due to absence of upper whorls in General distributio n. Lower the former. It can only be suggested that Danube and rivers of northwestern basin the syntype lacks at least 3 upper whorls. of the Black Sea. Meanwhile, there is only little doubt that R e m a r k s. The shells identified by most shells identified by I. Moskvicheva Starobogatov as E. (=F.) berlani are quite as A. pachya (Fig. 1L) really belong to that similar to the syntypes in the shell shape. species, as judging by the whorl and aper- Esperiana danubialis ture shape. It can be mentioned that the shell Bourguignat, 1884 of Vivipara praerosa (Gerstfeldt, 1959) Fig. 2D–F figured by Shadin [1952, fig. 142] quite Fagotia (Esperiana) danubialis Bourguignat, corresponds to the syntype of A. pachya, 1884: 35–36. while Shadin did not consider the two Type localit y. «Le Danube à other species of Amuropaludina. Ibraila; la Save à Agram; la Krapina à Sused

Fig. 1. A–F – Theodoxus subthermalis: A, B – syntype, H=7.9 mm; C, D – «Kreka brook, near Zamraradze estate» (Georgia?), H=6.8 mm, det. Shadin, ZIN No. 7; E, F –Zanga River, Armenia, H=7.0 mm, det. Shadin, ZIN No. 1; G–I – Amuropaludina chloantha: G, H – syntype, H=26.8 mm; I – middle reaches of the Amur, Russia, H=24.4 mm, det. Moskvicheva, ZIN No. 111; J–M – Amuropaludina pachya: J, K – syntype, H=36.5 mm; L – Lake Dzhalunshoye, Shrinda Channel, Amur Basin, Russia, H=52.0 mm, det. Moskvicheva, ZIN No. 10; M – Amur Channel near Novo-Mikhailovskoe Settlement, Khabarovsk Terri- tory, Russia, H=43.6 mm, det. Zatrawkin, ZIN No. 33.

91 92 (Croatie)» [Danube at Braila, Romania; indication of the type species – Melanop- Sava River at Zagreb and Krapina River, sis esperi Férussac, 1823 and accompanied Croatia]. with a small note on the composition of the T y p e s. 36 syntypes, MHNG, Bour- group: 10 species from the Danube Basin, guignat collection, Nos. 11046 (3 speci- Persia and rivers of Anatolia and Mesopo- mens), 11047 (25 specimens), 11048 tamia. In 1884, Bourguignat gave a detailed (8 specimens). description of the new Fagotia sub- History of the name application . divided into 4 groups (subgenera): Esperi- Fagotia (Dneprifagotia) danubialis – Staro- bogatov et al., 1992 (shell morphology, distri- ana, Locardiana, Letourneuxiana and Ac- bution); roxiana. According to the Art. 12.2.5 of the – Gradovski, 1998 (ecology); ICZN, Fagotia Bourguignat, 1884 has been – Pershko, Bondarchuk, 2001 (distribution in recently considered as a junior northern Ukraine); of Esperiana Bourguignat, 1877 [Fischer, – Pershko, 2003 (shell morphology); 1994; Glaubrecht, 1996; Bank et al., 2001]. – Starobogatov et al., 2004 (key to identifica- tion, distribution); However, both names are sometimes used – Kantor, Sysoev, 2005; Kantor et al., 2009 in publications. It can be mentioned that, (information about the types, type locality and according to the results of molecular analy- general distribution); sis, Smolen and Falniowski [2009] suggest – Pershko, 2011 (karyology, distribution in to synonymize Fagotia (i.e., Esperiana) Ukraine). with Férussac, 1807. General distributio n. Lower Syntypes of E. berlani and E. danubi- Danube and rivers of northwestern basin alis are more similar to each other in the of the Black Sea (Yuzhnyi Bug and Pripyat). shell slenderness than shells of the same R e m a r k s. At present, both above- names stored in the ZIN (Fig. 2C, F). The mentioned species are not recognized in syntypes differ mainly in the aperture the West European fauna of the Danube. shape: the aperture is oval in E. danubialis, The latter fauna is considered as contain- with nearly straight apertural lip, whereas ing only one species, in E. berlani it is rounded-oval, with a well- [Čejka, Ševčiková, 1999; Košel, 2005; expressed curved apertural lip. The used Şeşen, Schütt, 2009; Cioboiu, 2010]. characters for the species identification The first mentioning of the generic [Starobogatov et al., 2004]: apical angle is name Esperiana was given by Bourguig- less than 41° in danubialis and 43 to 47° nat [1877], without a diagnosis but with an in E. berlani, are most probably within

Fig. 2. A–C – Esperiana berlani: A, B – syntype, MHNG, Bourguignat collection, No. 11045, H=14.9 mm; C – Yuzhnyi Bug River, Ukraine, H=15.3 mm, det. Starobogatov, ZIN No. 10; D–F – Esperiana danubialis: D, E – syntype, MHNG, Bourguignat collection, No. 11048, H=12.7 mm; F – Tzaregradskoe girlo of the Dniester mouth, H=21.0 mm, det. Starobogatov, ZIN No. 3; G–K – Melanopsis minutula: G, H – syntype, MHNG, Bourguignat collection, No. 11186, H=11.4 mm; I, J – «Tzkhaltuba», Kutaisi, Georgia, H=7.4 mm, det. Lindholm, ZIN. No. 1; K – «Tzkhaltuba», vicinities of Kutaisi, Georgia, det. Rosen, H=6.4 mm; L–O – Microcolpia canaliculata: L, M – syntype, MHNG, Bourguignat collection, No. 11098, H=36.25 mm; N – Ekaterinoslav (=Dnepropetrovsk), Dnieper rapids, Ukraine, det. Starobogatov, H=22.0 mm, ZIN. No. 1; O – Ekaterinoslav (=Dnepropetrovsk), Dnieper rapids, Ukraine, det. Starobogatov, H=18.3 mm, ZIN. No. 1; P–S – Microcolpia potamactebia: P, R – syntype, MHNG, Bourguignat collection, No. 11116, H=34.5 mm; S – lower Danube near Izmail, Ukraine, H=16.1 mm, det. Starobogatov, ZIN No. 3.

93 the framework of infraspecific variability Microcolpia canaliculata of E. esperi characterized by high eco- Bourguignat, 1884 logical tolerance. Pershko [2003], having Fig. 2L–O employed a statistical analysis of 4 indices Microcolpia canaliculata Bourguignat, 1884: 62. of the shell, did not find any significant Type localit y. «Le Danube à differences between specimens identified Ibraïla» [Danube at Braila, Romania]. by her as berlani and danubialis. It should T y p e s. 1 syntype, MHNG, Bourgu- be noted that a wide-scale polymorphism ignat collection, No. 11098. within one biological species embracing History of the name application. three nomenclatural species requires an Microcolpia canaliculata Starobogatov et al., explanation. 1992 (shell description, distribution); – Anistratenko, 1998 (key to identification, Melanopsis minutula shell description, distribution); Bourguignat, 1884 – Pershko, 2003 (shell morphology); Fig. 2G–K – Starobogatov et al., 2004 (key to identifi- Melanopsis minutula Bourguignat, 1884: 92–93. cation); Type localit y. «Fontaine froide Microcolpia canaliculata Kantor, Sysoev, 2005; Kantor et al., 2009 (information about the du Hamman à Brousse (Anatolie); Nahr- types, type locality and general distribution); Antalies dans le Liban (Syrie); puits ar- – Pershko, 2011 (karyology). tésien de Tamerna-Kedima, dans le Ziban General distributio n. Lower (Algérie)» [Turkey, Lebanon, and Algeria]. Danube and rivers of north-western Black T y p e s . More than 30 syntypes, Sea basin. MHNG, Bourguignat collection, Nos. R e m a r k s. See below. 11186, 11187, 11188. History of the name application. Microcolpia potamactebia Melanopsis minutula – Izzatullaev, Starobo- (Bourguignat, 1870) gatov, 1984 (key to identification, distribution); Fig. 2P–S – Kantor, Sysoev, 2005; Kantor et al., 2009 Melanopsis potamactebia Bourguignat, 1870: (information about types, type locality and gene- 67–68. ral distribution). Type localit y. «Le Danube ... de General distributio n. West- Brahilov, … des environs de Belgrade» ern Georgia. [Danube at Braila, Romania; Belgrade, R e m a r k s. Specimens from vicini- Serbia]. ties of Kutaisi, initially identified by Rosen T y p e s. 1 syntype, MHNG, Bour- and Lindholm as Melanopsis minutula guignat collection, No. 11116. and stored in the ZIN, were subsequently History of the name application . re-identified by Z. Izzatullaev as Mela- Microcolpia canaliculata – Starobogatov nopsis buccinoidea (Olivier, 1801) (or et al., 1992 (shell description, distribution); M. praemorsa buccinoidea). There are no – Anistratenko, 1998 (shell description, key other published data on records of M. minu- to identification, distribution); tula in waterbodies of Georgia. Probably, – Pershko, 2003 (shell morphology); Melanopsis minutula Bourguignat, 1884 – Starobogatov et al., 2004 (key to identifica- tion, distribution); should be excluded from the continental – Kantor, Sysoev, 2005; Kantor et al., 2009 fauna of Russia and adjacent countries, (information about the types, type locality and although the species validity or its synony- general distribution); mization require additional studies. – Pershko, 2011 (karyology).

94 General distributio n. Lower T y p e s. MHNG, Bourguignat collec- Danube and rivers of north-western Black tion No. 5611. Sea basin. H i s t o r y o f t h e n a m e application . R e m a r k s. There are nine lots of Thalassobia coutagnei – Anistratenko, 1991 M. potamactebia in the Bourguignat col- (taxonomic remarks); lection. Two of them are marked as syn- – Anistratenko, Stadnichenko, 1994 (shell morphology, distribution); types. However, their site of collection – Anistratenko, 1998 (key to identification, («La Save (=Sava) à Agram (=Zagreb), distribution); Croatie») does not correspond to the type – Starobogatov et al., 2004 (key to identifica- locality as stated in the original publica- tion, distribution); tion. Therefore, only the lot No. 11116 – Prydatko, 2006 (distribution); should be considered as the type series. – Khaliman et al., 2006 (distribution); According to Bank et al. [2001], Micro- – Kantor, Sysoev, 2005; Kantor et al., 2009 colpia Bourguignat, 1884 is a subgenus of (information about the types, type locality and general distribution). Esperiana, and this subgenus includes only General distributio n. Mostly one species, E. (M.) daudebartii [Prevost, brackish-water areas of the Black (Ten- 1821] with 3 subspecies. One of the latters, dovsky Bay, Khadzhibei Liman, Novoros- E. (M.) daudebartii acicularis (Férussac, siysk, Molochnyi Liman) and Azov seas. 1823), is most similar to M. canaliculata and M. potamactebia. R e m a r k s. Due to the absence of Most shells identified as M. cana- exact data on the types of the species at liculata and M. potamactebia in the ZIN the moment of studying the collection, collection are similar to the respective only the lot No. 5506 (Tunisia) was inves- syntype in the general shell shape. Like tigated (Fig. 3A–C). Anyway, these shells in the above-mentioned species of Espe- have been identified by Bourguignat as riana, the differences between syntypes Paludestrina coutagnei. of M. canaliculata and M. potamacte- Initially, this species was listed within bia seem to be much smaller than those the family Bythinellidae [Locard, 1893], between shells stored in the ZIN under then Germain [1931] synonymized the these species names. At the same time, species with Paludestrina procerula Pala- the differences between the syntypes are dilhe, 1869. It was probably the reason probably age-related, whereas those be- why it was not mentioned in literature until tween some ZIN specimens seem to be the end of the 20th century [Anistratenko, populational. 1991; Anistratenko, Stadnichenko, 1994]. In the fauna of the Black-Azov seas basin, Family Tryon, 1866 the latter authors recognize both species: Subfamily Littoridininae Thiele, 1928 T. coutagnei (Littoridinidae) and Hydrobia Thalassobia coutagnei procerula (Hydrobiidae). The latter spe- (Bourguignat in Coutagne, 1881) cies in European literature is considered a Fig. 3A–E synonym of Hydrobia acuta acuta (Drapa- Paludestrina coutagnei Bourguignat – Coutagne, rnaud, 1805) [Hallgass, 2010]. The genus 1881: 26–27. Semisalsa Radoman, 1974, synonymized Type localit y. «L’etang de Berre, by Anistratenko [1991] with Thalassobia à l’extremité nord de l’anse de Saint- Bourguignat in Mabille 1877, is men- Chamas» [south-eastern France]. tioned in European literature as a subgenus

95 96 of Heleobia Stimpson, 1865, subfamily – Yurlova, Vodyanitskaya, 2005 (distribu- Cochliopinae, family Hydrobiidae [Bank tion, occurrence); et al., 2001]. At the same time, Semisalsa – Kantor, Sysoev, 2005; Kantor et al., 2009 graeca Radoman, 1974, which is a junior (information about types, type locality and gene- ral distribution); synonym of Thalassobia (=Paludestrina) – Izzatulaev, Stadnichenko, 2010 (distribu- coutagnei according to Anistratenko tion in Central Asia); [1991], is recorded in the fauna of Iberian – Nekhaev, 2011 (life forms). Peninsula as a synonym of Heleobia (Semi- General distributio n. South salsa) stagnorum (Gmelin, 1791) [Hall- Europe, northern Caucasus, Transcauca- gass, 2010]. The studied shells identified sia, Central Asia. by Bourguignat as Paludestrina coutag- R e m a r k s. There are three lots in nei, differ from both Heleobia (Semisalsa) the Bourguignat collection: one from «Le stagnorum and snails from the Azov Sea Danube à Braïla» and two from «Varna, considered to be Thalassobia coutagnei. Bulgarie». However, the two latter do not Family Lymnaeidae Rafinesque, 1815 correspond to the type locality as stated in the original publication. Thus, only the lot Lymnaea berlani No. 6785 belongs to the type series. Unfor- (Bourguignat, 1870) tunately, this specimen (Fig. 3F) is bro- Fig. 3F–I ken, with only last and, partly, penultimate Limnaea berlani Bourguignat, 1870: 44–45. whorls remaining. It is, however, like other Type localit y. Not stated in the young specimens from the Bourguignat original description (lower Danube – from collection, not very similar to specimens title). from ZIN identified as L. berlani. These T y p e s. 1 syntype, MHNG, Bour- latter probably belong to a geographic race guignat collection, No. 6785. of L. danubialis or to a new species. History of the name application . Lymnaea berlani – Starobogatov, 1977 (key Lymnaea doriana to identification); – Kruglov, Starobogatov, 1986 (shell descrip- (Bourguignat, 1862) tion, distribution); Fig. 3J–L – Kruglov, Starobogatov, 1993 (illustration Limnaea doriana Bourguignat, 1862a: 60. of shell and genitalia); – Starobogatov et al., 2004 (key to identifica- Type localit y. «Sicile». tion, distribution); T y p e s. 1 syntype, MHNG, Bour- – Stadnichenko, 2004 (morphology, distribu- guignat collection, No. 6339. tion in Ukraine); History of the name application . – Kruglov, 2005 (morphology, distribution, – Westerlund, 1885 (as synonym of L. stag- ecology); nalis lacustris Studer, 1820);

Fig. 3. A–E – Thalassobia coutagnei: A–C – «Oued-Serrag (=Wadi As Surraq), Tunisie», MHNG, Bourguignat collection, No. 5506, H=4.9 and 5.3 mm, respectively; D, E – Dnieper estuary, Ukraine, H=2.9 mm, det. Anistratenko, ZIN No. 1; F–I – Lymnaea berlani: F – syntype, MHNG, Bourguignat col- lection, No. 6785, H=39.5 mm; G – Krasnooskolsoye water reservoir, Yatzkoye Settlement, Ukraine, det. Starobogatov, H=26.5 mm, ZIN No. 6; H – Varna, MHNG, Bourguignat collection, No. 6786, H=59.2 mm; I – Varna, MHNG, Bourguignat collection, No. 6787, H=28 mm; J–L – Lymnaea doriana: J–K – syntype, MHNG, Bourguignat collection, No. 6339, H=53.5 mm; L – Leningrad Region, Lake Ladoga, near Osino- vetsky Lighthouse, Russia, det. Starobogatov, H=19.1 mm, ZIN No. 1.

97 – Germain, 1931 [as L. lacustris (=L. stag- Lymnaea auricularia persica – Lazareva, nalis L., 1758)]; 1967 (shell morphology, distribution); Lymnaea doriana – Kruglov, Starobogatov, – Izzatullaev, 1972 (distribution); 1985 (description, morphology, distribution); Lymnaea persica – Kruglov, Starobogatov, – Kruglov, Starobogatov, 1991 (egg mass 1989 (morphology, distribution); morphology); – Kruglov, Starobogatov, 1993 (illustration – Kruglov, Starobogatov, 1993 (illustration of shell and genitalia); of shell and genitalia); – Starobogatov et al., 2004 (key to identifi- – Prozorova, Sharyi-Ool, 1999 (distribution cation); in Tuva); – Kruglov, 2005 (morphology, distribution); – Starobogatov et al., 2004 (key to identifica- – Kantor, Sysoev, 2005; Kantor et al., 2009 tion, distribution); (information about the types, type locality and – Stadnichenko, 2004 (morphology, distribu- general distribution). tion in Ukraine, ecology); General distributio n. Afgha- – Kruglov, 2005 (morphology, distribution, nistan, Iran, southern Azerbaijan, Taji- ecology); – Kantor, Sysoev, 2005; Kantor et al., 2009 kistan. (information about the types, type locality and R e m a r k s. Shells identified as general distribution); L. persica in the ZIN collection differ – Andreyeva et al., 2010 (key to identifica- morphologically. Probably, only the shells tion, morphology, distribution); studied by Kruglov (and unknown to us) – Nekhaev, 2011 (life forms). are similar to the holotype. Specimens with General distributio n. South intact apex illustrated here (Fig. 4C–E) are of East Europe, Caucasus, Central Asia, not similar to the holotype of L. persica. northern Kazakhstan, Tuva. Seemingly, these shells actually belong R e m a r k s. L. doriana certainly be- to L. parapsilia sensu Vinarski and Glöer longs to the group of L. stagnalis, but ap- [2009]. plication of the name L. doriana to shells in the ZIN collection is doubtful because Lymnaea psilia they considerably differ from the type (Bourguignat, 1862) in the shape of aperture. Probably, some Fig. 4 F–H specimens identified as L. doriana belong Limnaea psilia Bourguignat, 1862a: 61. to another (new?) species. Type localit y. «Rivière de l’Au- Lymnaea persica be, entre Unienville et Dienville (départe- (Bourguignat in Issel, 1865) ment de l’Aube)» [north-eastern France]. Fig. 4A–E T y p e s. 6 syntypes, MHNG, Bour- guignat collection, No. 6432. Limnaea auricularia var. persica Bourguignat – History of the name application . Issel, 1865: 47. Lymnaea psilia – Izzatulaev, Starobogatov, Type localit y. «Kerman (Persia 1983 (morphology); meridionale)» [a thermal spring, Kermani, – Izzatulaev, Starobogatov, 1985 (distri- Iran]. bution); – Kruglov, Starobogatov, 1989 (morphology, H o l o t y p e. MHNG, Bourguignat distribution); collection No. 6321. – Kruglov, Starobogatov, 1993 (illustration History of the name application . of shell and genitalia); Westerlund (1885) synonymized L. persica – Prozorova, 1998 (distribution); with Lymnaea schirazensis Busch in Küster, – Prozorova, Sharyi-Ool, 1999 (distribution 1862; in Tuva);

98 – Prozorova, 2001; Prozorova, Kolpakov, coexistence takes place). Besides, there is 2004 (records in southern Russian Far East); a third species similar in conchology and – Prozorova, Shed’ko, 2003; Prozorova, genital morphology: Lymnaea intercisa 2005 (records in northern Russian Far East); Lindholm, 1909. It is characterized by the – Starobogatov et al., 2004 (key to identifica- tion, distribution); penial sheath to praeputium length ratio – Stadnichenko, 2004 (distribution); being 0.87–0.90 [Izzatullaev et al., 1983]. – Sitnikova et al., 2004 (distribution); This species was originally described as – Prozorova, Zasypkina, 2005 (record in the a subspecies (variety) of L. auricularia Khilok River basin); from several inlets of Chivyrkui Bay and – Prozorova et al., 2009 (records in the Lake Maloe More Strait of Lake Baikal. Subse- Baikal basin); quently it was recorded in Europe, south – Kantor, Sysoev, 2005; Kantor et al., 2009 (information about the types, type locality and of Central , north-eastern Kazakh- general distribution); stan, and rivers of the Pacific coast of Rus- – Vinarski, Glöer, 2009 (as L. parapsilia, sian Far East [Starobogatov et al., 2004; morphology, distribution); Kruglov, 2005]. Types of L. intercisa were – Khokhutkin et al., 2009 (morphology, dis- lost but some topotypes are quite similar tribution); to L. psilia sensu Kruglov, Starobogatov – Izzatulaev, Stadnichenko, 2010 (distribu- (or L. parapsilia) or L. auricularia. Thus, tion in Central Asia). the problem of existence of separate bio- General distributio n. Siberia logical species L. auricularia, L. parap- and Russian Far East. silia and L. intercisa (but not ecological R e m a r k s. Westerlund [1885], and subspecies of L. auricularia) with their then Germain [1931] suggested to con- possibly apomorphic characters remains sider L. psilia as juveniles of L. stagnalis to be not resolved completely. and, correspondingly, synonymized it with the latter. Family Rafinesque, 1815 Vinarski and Glöer [2009] have shown adelosius that the type specimens of L. psilia in (Bourguignat, 1859) MHNG are different from shells adopted Fig. 4I–N by Kruglov and Starobogatov as L. psilia. Planorbis adelosius Bourguignat, 1859: 518, They described the latters as a new species, pl. 19, figs. 13–15. L. parapsilia Vinarski and Glöer, 2009. Type localit y. «Les marécages Having shown statistically significant dif- de la Toscane, notamment dans les envi- ferences in morphology of L. auricularia rons de Pise» [northern Italy]. Linnaeus, 1758 and L. parapsilia, the au- T y p e s. 4 syntypes, MHNG, Bour- thors did not mention any non-overlap- guignat collection, Nos. 7367, 7368. ping character both in shell morphology History of the name application . and in the ratio between penial sheath and – Maksimova, 1995 (distribution in water- praeputium length. This ratio was said by bodies of Smolensk Region, karyology, inter- the authors to be 0.62–0.97 in L. parapsilia breeding with P. banaticus Lang in Bourguignat, and 0.90–1.41 in L. auricularia. The ab- 1859); – Kruglov, Maksimova, 2000 (interbreeding sence of non-overlapping characters makes with P. banaticus); identification difficult, especially in the – Shikhova, 2004 (distribution in Vyatka case of coexistence of the species (if such basin and Vyatka-Dvina watershed);

99 100 – Starobogatov et al., 2004 (key to identifica- General distributio n. North- tion, distribution); western Black Sea maritime area, Baltic – Vinarski et al., 2007 (distribution in West- Sea basin, in lakes (Starobogatov et al., ern Siberia); – Kantor, Sysoev, 2005; Kantor et al., 2009 2004) – see below. (information about the types, type locality and R e m a r k s. We were unable to trace general distribution); any records of this species in Russian General distributio n. Entire fauna prior to publication of Starobogatov Europe, Western Siberia, in small perma- et al. [2004]. Interestingly, the review of nent water bodies. the genus Planorbis O.F. Müller, 1774 in R e m a r k s. Westerlund (1885) re- the fauna of the former USSR [Soldatenko, garded P. adelosius as only a form of Starobogatov, 2000] did not mention this Pl. penchinati (Bourguignat, 1870), which species at all. The search in the ZIN col- in its turn was considered as a variety of lection did not reveal any specimens col- Planorbarius сorneus (Linnaeus, 1758) lected in Russia and identified as this and has not been subsequently mentioned species. Similarly, E. Soldatenko [pers. in European literature. Despite similarity comm.] does not know specimens of this in the shell and aperture shape in the syn- species from our fauna. The respective figu- types and snails identified as this species res in Starobogatov et al. [2004, pl. 141, and collected from Russian waterbodies, figs. 7–9] quite differ from the syntype there are evident differences between them figured here in the shell outline. Therefore, in the whorl expansion rate. the presence of this species in the fauna of Russia and adjacent countries seems Planorbarius penchinati unjustified and rather doubtful. (Bourguignat, 1870) Fig. 4O–Q Planorbarius stenostoma Planorbis penchinati Bourguignat, 1870: 39–42, (Bourguignat in Servain, 1881) pl. 3, figs. 4–6. Fig. 5A–F Type localit y. «Le Danube». Planorbis stenostoma Bourguignat – Servain, T y p e s. 8 syntypes, MHNG, Bour- 1881: 82. guignat collection, No. 7412. Type localit y. «Des bouches du History of the name application . Danube». – Starobogatov et al., 2004 (key to identifi- T y p e s. Unknown. The Bourguig- cation, distribution); – Kantor, Sysoev, 2005 and Kantor et al., nat collection contains 2 lots (more than 2009 (information about the types, type locality 5 specimens): MHNG Nos. 7414 and 7366 and general distribution). collected at «Le Danube à Braila».

Fig. 4. A–E – Lymnaea persica: A–B – holotype, MHNG, Bourguignat collection No. 6321, H=16.3 mm; C – Lake Azbergen-Kul, right part of the Amu-Darya Delta, Mujnaksky District, Uzbekistan, H=15.3 mm, ZIN No. 35; D – Lake Kory-Kul, Khiva District, Kharazles Region, Uzbekistan, det. Starobogatov, H=10.2 mm, ZIN No. 33; E – Malyi Dzhangalach, Kazakhstan, det. Lazareva, H=8.6 mm, ZIN No. 17; F–H – Lymnaea psilia: F–G – syntype, MHNG, Bourguignat collection, No. 6432, H=7.1 mm; H – Odessa, Ukraine, det. Starobogatov, H=16.3 mm, ZIN No. 10; I–N – Planorbarus adelosius: I–K – syntype, MHNG, Bourguignat collection, No. 7367, D=32.5 mm; L–N – Salekhard City (Obdorsk), sand bar of the Poluy River, northern Russia, det. Starobogatov, D=25.9 mm, ZIN No. 2; O–Q – Planorbarius penchinati, syntype, MHNG, Bourguignat collection, No. 7412, D=47.5 mm.

101 Fig. 5. A–F – Planorbarius stenostoma: A–C – syntype, MHNG, Bourguignat collection, No. 7415, D=55 mm; D–F – Girelsan, Transylvania, det. Lindholm, H=17.9 mm, ZIN No. 2; G–L – Anisus stelmachoe- tius: G–I – syntype, MHNG, Bourguignat collection, No. 7562, D=5.1 mm; J–L – East-Kazakhstan Region, Oktyabrsky District, Bukhtarma water reservoir, Kazakhstan, det. Krivosheina, D=4.6 mm, ZIN No. 14.

History of the name application . – Izzatulaev, Stadnichenko, 2010 (distribu- Planorbarius stenostoma – Krivosheina, Staro- tion in Central Asia). bogatov, 1973 (shell morphology, distribution); General distributio n. Steppe – Starobogatov, 1977 (key to identification); areas of south Europe and Western Sibe- – Starobogatov et al., 2004 (key to identifica- ria to Altay and Central Asia, in temporary tion, distribution); waterbodies. – Mezhzherin et al., 2005 (as non-existing species); R e m a r k s. Westerlund [1885] con- – Kantor, Sysoev, 2005; Kantor et al., 2009 sidered P. stenostoma, like P. corneus, as (information about types, type locality and gene- a separate species. Germain [1931] men- ral distribution); tioned only P. corneus for European fauna,

102 whereas Baker [1945] suggested that the – Kruglov, Soldatenko, 2000 (shell, repro- genus Planorbarius consists of several ductive morphology); species including P. stenostoma. Presently, – Prozorova, 2003 (distribution); – Starobogatov et al., 2004 (key to identifica- only P. сorneus, sometimes with 4–5 sub- tion, distribution); species in the Danube delta, is believed to – Kantor, Sysoev, 2005; Kantor et al., 2009 inhabit Europe [Bank et al., 2001; Falkner (information about the types, type locality and et al., 2001; Cioboiu, 2006]. general distribution); Until the end of the last century, the – Prozorova et al., 2009 (record in the Lake fauna of Russia and adjacent territories Baikal basin); contained 5 species of Planorbarius in- – Soldatenko, Sitnikova, 2009 (stylet mor- phology). cluding P. stenostoma [Starobogatov, General distributio n. Europe, 1977, Starobogatov, Prozorova, 1990]. Vi- south of Siberia eastward of Transbaikalia narski et al. [2007] believe that, in spite (Ivan-Arachlei lakes) and north of Mongo- of data of Starobogatov et al. [2004], there lia, in permanent waterbodies. are no reliable findings of this species in R e m a r k s. Germain [1931] consi- waterbodies of Western Siberia. dered P. stelmachoetius as a variety (sub- The differences between the syntypes species?) of P. albus (Müller, 1774), but of P. stenostoma and the shells identified then Baker [1945] and Meier-Brook as this species in the ZIN collection are [1983] did not mention P. stelmachoe- very high (Fig. 5A–F). Therefore and tak- tius in Gyraulus at all. Only the fauna of ing into account the above-said, the posi- Russia and adjacent countries included tive identifcation of this species in Russian A. (G.) stelmachoetius as a separate species fauna will be possible only after a revision or subspecies. The ZIN collection contains of this snail group. Until that, we prefer to specimens of P. stelmachoetius but many regard the presence of this species in our of them are rather heterogeneous and not fauna as at least doubtful. similar to the types. Anisus stelmachoetius Choanomphalus amauronius (Bourguignat, 1860) Bourguignat, 1860 Fig. 5G–I Fig. 6A–I Planorbis stelmachoetius Bourguignat, 1860c: Choanomphalus amauronius Bourguignat, 139–140, pl. 2, fig. 10–13. 1860a: 529, pl. 23, figs. 6–10. Type localit y. «Dans un petit Type localit y. «Dans la rivière ruisseau de la vallée ferrugineuse, près de d’Angara ainsi que dans le lac Baïkal, en Dinan» [Brittany, France]. Sibérie». T y p e s. 18 syntypes, MHNG, Bour- T y p e s. 6 syntypes, MHNG, Bour- guignat collection, No. 7562. guignat collection, No. 7164. History of the name application . History of the name application . Anisus albus stelmachoetius – Shadin, 1952 – Dybowski, 1875 (morphology, distribution); (key to identification); – Lindholm, 1909 (morphology, distribution); Anisus stelmachoetius – Starobogatov, 1977 – Dybowski, Grochmalicki, 1925 (morpho- (key to identification); logy); – Pirogov et al., 1994 (distribution); – Kozhov, 1936 (taxonomy, synonymy, mor- – Prozorova, Sharyi-Ool, 1999 (distribution phology, key to identification, distribution); in Tuva); – Shadin, 1952 (key to identification);

103 104 – Starobogatov, 1970 (distribution); et Grochmalicki, 1925, whereas shells with – Beckman Starobogatov, 1975 (taxonomy); a narrower umbilicus were regarded as – Starobogatov, Sitnikova, 1992 (speciation); Ch. aorus. The figuredsyntype has a higher – Roepstorf et al., 2003 (feeding); and more compact shell than those subse- – Starobogatov et al., 2004 (key to identifica- tion, distribution); quently identified as that species. – Sitnikova et al., 2004 (distribution); Choanomphalus aorus – Soldatenko, Sitnikova, 2009 (stylet mor- Bourguignat, 1860 phology); – Kantor, Sysoev, 2005; Kantor et al., 2009 Fig. 6J–R (information about types, type locality and gene- Bourguignat, 1860a: 530, pl. 23, figs. 11–15. ral distribution). Type localit y. «En Sibérie, dans General distributio n. South- le lac Baïkal». ern Lake Baikal and Angara River. T y p e s. 3 syntypes, MHNG, Bour- R e m a r k s. No syntypes are fully guignat collection, No. 7165. identical with the figure of Bourguignat. History of the name application . However, the three largest specimens – Dybowski, 1875 (morphology, distribution); quite correspond to the figure and origi- – Lindholm, 1909 (morphology, distribution); nal description, whereas the three smaller – Dybowski, Grochmalicki, 1925 (morpho- specimens have a slight keel (or angu- logy); losity) around the false umbilicus, which Ch. amauronius aorus – Kozhov, 1936 (mor- phology, key to identification, distribution); is characteristic of the Choanomphalus Ch. amauronius aorus – Shadin, 1952 (key maacki (Gerstfeldt, 1859) group. At least to identification); three species, Ch. amauronius, Ch. aorus Ch. aorus – Starobogatov, 1970 (distribution); Bourguignat, 1860, and Ch. maacki have – Beckman, Starobogatov, 1975 (taxonomy); been described from a single lot sampled – Starobogatov, Sitnikova, 1992 (speciation); by Maack in 1855. A portion of that lot – Roepstorf et al., 2003 (feeding); – Starobogatov et al., 2004 (key to identifica- with the label «syntypes of Ch. maacki» is tion, distribution); stored in the ZIN collection and includes, – Sitnikova et al., 2004 (distribution); according to Starobogatov’s identification, – Kantor, Sysoev, 2005; Kantor et al., 2009 several species of Choanomphalus. (information about types, type locality and gene- Dybowski and Grochmalicki [1901, ral distribution). 1925] described several species which General distributio n. Baikal, were then synonymized with Ch. amau- Angara River downstream to Bratsk. ronius by Kozhov [1936]. This has resulted R e m a r k s. Of the three syntypes in routine identification of shells differing only one, the largest specimen (Fig. 6J–L) in conchology as one species. Particularly, corresponds to the figure of Bourguignat identification of Ch. amauronius was of- [1862a, pl. VI, figs 11–15]. However, ten based on specimens more similar to the this specimen and another, smaller shell original description of Ch. valvatoides Dy- are similar to shells being usually identi- bowski, 1875 or Ch. angulatus Dybowski fied as Ch. anomphalus Dybowski, 1901

Fig. 6. A–I – Choanomphalus amauronius: A–C – syntype, MHNG, Bourguignat collection, No. 7164, D=5.4 mm; D–F – Baikal, Baranchiki, Russia, det. Lindholm, D=6.3 mm, ZIN No. 2; G–I – Angara River, Russia, det. Kozhov, D=6.1 mm, ZIN No. 112; J–R – Choanomphalus aorus: J–L – syntype, MHNG, Bour- guignat collection, No. 7165, D=5.1 mm; M–O – Baikal, Baranchiki, Russia, det. Lindholm, D=6.2 mm, ZIN No. 2; P–R – Baikal, Ayaya Inlet, Russia, det. Lindholm, D=4.4 mm, ZIN No. 1.

105 (=Ch. dybowskianus Lindholm, 1909, or seaux de Vendeuvre-sur-Barse (Aube)» Ch. cryptomphalus Dybowski, 1901). The [northern and north-eastern France]. latter names were united as a single spe- T y p e s. 72 syntypes, MHNG, Bour- cies, Ch. dybowskianus [Kozhov, 1936], or guignat collection, Nos. 6022, 6026, 6027, as two separate species, Ch. anomphalus 6028, 6029, 6030, 6031. and Ch. cryptomphalus [Beckman, Staro- History of the name application . bogatov, 1975]. The absence of type speci- – Soldatenko, Starobogatov, 2004 (descrip- mens of these last taxa hampers species tion, morphology, distribution); – Kantor, Sysoev, 2005; Kantor et al., 2009 identification of Choanomphalus, which (information about types, type locality and gene- evidently needs a taxonomic revision. ral distribution). Family Ancylidae Rafinesque, 1815 General distributio n. Moun- tain rivers of Transcaucasia and Cisca- Ancylus benoitianus ucasia. Bourguignat, 1862 R e m a r k s. See below. Fig. 7A–F Ancylus benoitianus Bourguignat, 1862b: 180–181. Ancylus jani Bourguignat, 1853 Type localit y. «Sicile». Fig. 7M–R T y p e s . 4 syntypes, MHNG, Bour- Ancylus jani Bourguignat, 1853: 185. guignat collection, No. 6010. History of the name application . Type localit y. «Jan, dans la Lom- – Soldatenko, Starobogatov, 2004 (descrip- bardie» [northern Italy]. tion, morphology, distribution); T y p e s. Unknown. – Starobogatov et al., 2004 (key to identifica- History of the name application . tion, distribution); – Akramowski, 1976; – Kantor, Sysoev, 2005; Kantor et al., 2009 – Soldatenko, Starobogatov, 2004 (descrip- (information about types, type locality and gene- tion, morphology, distribution); ral distribution). – Starobogatov et al., 2004 (key to identi- General distributio n. Western fication); Transcaucasia, northern Ossetia, southern – Kantor, Sysoev, 2005; Kantor et al., 2009 Daghestan, above water level in mountain (information about the types, type locality and general distribution). springs. General distributio n. Moun- R e m a r k s. The lot No. 6010 conta- tain rivers of Transcaucasia and Ciscau- ins 4 syntypes, three of them possess the casia. apex projecting beyond the shell outline R e m a r k s. There are 24 lots of A. jani (in upper view) and one with the apex not in the Bourguignat collection, MHNG. projecting beyond the shell contour. Other However, none of them correspond to the remarks see after Ancylus jani. type locality, meaning that all of those do not belong to the type series. Nevertheless, Ancylus gibbosus we are illustrating a specimen identified by Bourguignat, 1853 Bourguignat as that species. Fig. 7 G–L Three species of ancylids are either Ancylus gibbosus Bourguignat, 1853: 186. not mentioned at all in current Western Type localit y. «Département de publications, or are regarded as synonyms l’Oise (Baudan), des environs de Verdun of Ancylus fluviatilus (Müller, 1774) (Liénard), enfin de plusieurs petits ruis- [Bank et al., 2001; Hallgass, 2010]. In our

106 Fig. 7. A–F – Ancylus benoitianus: A–C – syntype, MHNG, Bourguignat collection, No. 6010, L=5.2 mm; D–F – Georgia, Ukhra-Tskaro Mountain pass, brook on southern slope, det. Soldatenko, L=5.0 mm, ZIN No. 3; G–L – Ancylus gibbosus: G–I – syntype, MHNG, Bourguignat collection, «Fontaine près Mouy, France», No. 6027, L=3.6 mm; J–L – Georgia, Borzhomi District, vicinities of Aykuri village, det. Staro- bogatov, L=4.9 mm, ZIN No. 1; M–R – Ancylus jani: M–O – MHNG, Bourguignat collection, No. 6057, Varèse, Italie, L=3.8 mm; P–R – Nagorno-Karabagh Autonomous Region, Stepanakert – Agdam, spring near Boluidzha River, Azerbaijan, det. Starobogatov, L=4.8 mm, ZIN No. 1. opinion the shells identified by Bourguig- cantly; also the figures of these species nat as Ancylus gibbosus (Fig. 7G–I) and are similar in Soldatenko and Staroboga- A. jani (Fig. 7M–O) do not differ signifi- tov [2004, Fig. 5С, D]. Probably, this was

107 the reason for the absence of A. gibbosus racteristic of the types of A. benoitianus in Starobogatov et al. [2004]. In shells but not of A. gibbosus and A. jani types. of A. gibbosus and A. jani, identified by Therefore, there is some confusion, and Soldatenko and Starobogatov (Fig. 7D–F, the problem of real existence of the three J–L and P–R), the apex projects outside species of Ancylus described by Bour- of the aperture margin, which is cha- guignat remains unresolved. Conclusions As it could be expected, a comparison of was attempted to be revised without a study species identified as Bourguignat’s ones in (impossible at that time)1 of the type ma- the fauna of Russia and adjacent countries terial. This is just additional evidence that to the respective types or specimens with the Russian fresh-water molluscan fauna is author’s identification has revealed a lot of far from being completely known and taxo- discrepancies. This seems to be quite natu- nomically settled, and we can only hope ral for the situation when such taxonomi- that this publication will provide some aid cally complex group as fresh-water snails to further investigation in this field.

Acknowledgements This work has been done with the fi- ZIN. We are also grateful to Dr. Elena Sol- nancial support from the Natural History datenko for her granting the relevant data Museum of Geneva and the Ministry of Edu- on Ancylidae. The last author is greatly in- cation and Science of the Russian Federa- debted to the Muséum National d’Histoire tion. We are very thankful to Malacological Naturelle, Paris and its staff for the access Collection Curator of the Natural History to the library of the museum. We also thank Museum of Geneva, Dr. Yves Finet for in- Dr. Larisa A. Prozorova and the anonymous valuable aid. We are very thankful to Mrs. reviewer for advices and comments. The Lidiya L.Yarokhnovich for her constant as- work was partly supported by RFBR, proj- sistance in working with collections of the ects Nos. 11-04-92000 and 12-04-00503.

References

Andreyeva S.I., Andreyev N.I., Vinarski M.V. 2010. Anistratenko V.V. 1998. Guide to pectinibranch Key to Freshwater Gastropods of Western Sibe- molluscs (Gastropoda, Pectinibranchia) of ria (: Gastropoda). Vol. 1. Gastropoda: the fauna of Ukraine. Part 2. Freshawater and . Fasc. 1. Families Acroloxidae and land species // Vestnik Zoologii (Zoological Lymnaeidae. Omsk. 200 p. [In Russian]. Herald, Kiev). Supplement N 8. P. 67–117. Anistratenko V.V. 1991. Molluscs of the Hydrobia [In Russian]. sensu lato group of the Black and Azov seas // Anistratenko V.V., Stadnichenko A.P. 1994 [1995]. Bulletin of the Moscow Society of Naturalists, Littoriniformes, Rissoiformes // Fauna Ukrainy Biological Series. V. 96, N 6. P. 73–81. [Fauna of Ukraine]. V. 29. Mollusks, N 1, Book 2. [In Russian]. Kiev: Naukova Dumka. 175 p. [In Russian].

1 It should be mentioned that other Soviet malacologists worked mostly on marine faunas actively communicated with Westerm museums for type search and used photographs of types and respective information in their publi- cations (Editor).

108 Anistratenko O.Yu., Starobogatov Ya.I., Anistraten- Bourguignat J.R. 1862a. Notice monographique sur ko V.V. 1999. Molluscs of the genus Theodoxus les Limnées d’Europe du groupe de la Limnaea (Gastropoda, Pectinibranchia, Neritidae) from stagnalis // Revue et Magasin de Zoologie, Sé- the Black and Azov seas basin // Vestnik Zoo- rie 2. V. 14. P. 54–63. logii (Zoological Herald, Kiev). V. 33, N 3. Bourguignat J.B. 1862b. Etude synonymique sur le P. 11–19. [In Russian]. genre Ancylus // Les Spicileges Malacologique. Anistratenko V., Anistratenko O., Khaliman I. 2008. Paris: Bailliere et fils. P. 139–263. Gastropod molluscs of the Sea of Azov: zoo- Bourguignat J.R. 1870. Apercu sur la faune mala- geographic composition and biological traits cologique du bas Danube // Annales de Mala- as its salinity regime function // Ruthenica cologie. V. 1. P. 36–76. (Russian Malacological Journal). V. 18, N 1. Bourguignat J.R. 1877. Descriptions de deux nou- P. 9–16. [In Russian]. veaux genres algériens, suivies d’une classifi- Baker F.C. 1945. The Molluscan Family Planorbidae. cation des familles et des genres de mollusques Urbana: University of Illinois Press. 530 p. terrestres et fluviatiles du système européen // Bank R.A., Bouchet Ph., Falkner G., Gittenberger E., Bulletin de la Société des Sciences Physiques et Hausdorf B., von Proschwitz T., Ripken Th.E.J., Naturelles de Toulouse. V. 3, N 1. P. 49–101. 2001. Supraspecific classification of European Bourguignat J.R. 1884. Histoire des Mélaniens du non-marine Mollusca (CLECOM Sections système Européen // Annales de Malacologie. I+II) // Heldia. Bd. 4, N 1/2. P. 77–128. V. 2. P. 1–168. Beckman M.Yu., Starobogatov Ya.I. 1975. Baikal Čeika T., Ševčiková M. 1999. Freshwater molluscs deep-water molluscs and related forms // Trans- (Mollusca) of the Dunabian floodplain (Slova- actions [Trudy] of the Limnological Institute, kia) // Folia Faunistica Slovaca. N 4. P. 27–32. Siberian Branch of the USSR Academy of Sci- Cioboiu O. 2006. Diversity of Gastropoda in the Ro- ences. V. 18. P. 92–111. [In Russian]. manian sector of the Danube lower hydrograph- Bogatov V.V., Zatrawkin M.N. 1990 [1992]. Gastro- ic basin // Proceedings of the 36th International pod Molluscs of Fresh and Brackish Waters of Conference of IAD, Vienna. P. 230–235. the Far East of the USSR: A Guide. Vladivo- Cioboiu O. 2010. Gastropoda in the Danube – Car- stok: Far East Branch, USSR Academy of Sci- pathian hydrographic space: possible impact of ences. 169 p. [In Russian]. climate change // Proceedings of the 38th IAD Bouchet Ph. 2002. Mollusques terrestres et aqua- Conference, Dresden. P. 1–6. tiques de France: un nouveau référentiel taxo- Coutagne G. 1881. Notes sur la faune malacologi- nomique, un nouveau départ, de nouvelles que du bassin du Rhone // Annales de la Societe perspectives // G. Falkner, Th.E. Ripken, M. Linneenne de Lyon. V. 38. P. 1–55. Falkner. Mollusques Continentaux de France: Dance S.P. 1970. «Le fanatisme de nobis»: a study Liste de Référence Annotée et Bibliographie. of J.-R. Bourguignat and the «nouvelle école» // P. 5–20. (Patrimoines Naturels. V. 52). Journal of Conchology. V. 27. P. 65–86. Bourguignat J.R. 1853. Notice sur le genre Ancylus, Dybowski B., Grochmalicki Ya. 1925. Przyczynki suivie d’une catalogue synonymique des es- do znajomości mięczaków (Contributions á la pèces de ce genre // Journal de Conchyliologie. connaissance des Mollusques du lac Baikal) // V. 4. P. 55–66, 169–203. Kosmos. T. 50. S. 819–881. Bourguignat J.R. 1859. Amenites malacologiques // Dybowski W. 1875. Die Gastropoden-Fauna des Revue et Magasin de Zoologie, Série 2. V. 11. Baikal-Sees, anatomisch und systematisch P. 512–524. bearbeitet // Mémories de l’Académie Impéri- Bourguignat J.R. 1860a. Monographie du genre ale des Sciences de St. Pétersbourg. V. 22, N 8. Choanomphalus // Revue et Magasin de Zoo- S. 1–73. logie, Série 2. V. 12. P. 527–531. Dybowski W. 1901. Beschreibung eine neuen Bourguignat J.R. 1860b. Catalogue des mollusques Choanomphalus-Arten // Nachrichtenblatt der de la famille des paludinées recueillis jusqu’à ce Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft. jour en Sibérie et sur la territoire de l’Amour // V. 33, N 7–8. S. 119–125. Revue et Magasin de Zoologie, Série 2. V. 12. Falkner G., Bank R.A., von Proschwitz T. 2001. P. 531–537. Check-list of the non-marine Molluscan spe- Bourguignat J.R. 1860c. Malacologie Terrestre cies-group taxa of the states of Northern, Atlan- et Fluviatile de la Bretagne. Paris: Baillière. tic and (CLECOM I) // Heldia. 178 p. Bd. 4, No 1/2. P. 1–76.

109 Fischer W. 1994. Beiraege zur Kenntnis der rezenten Izzatulaev Z.I., Stadnichenko A.P. 2010. Distri- und fossilen Melanopsidae II. Ueber die Verb- bution of water mollusks of Central Asia in reitung und Entwicklung der Gattung Esperi- biotopes and different types of water bodies // ana Bourguignat (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia: Scientific Notes of Ternopol National Peda- Melanopsidae) in Mitteleuropa // Nachrichten- gogical University, Biological Series. Spe- blatt der Ersten Vorarlberger Malacologischen cial Issue, Hydroecology. V. 2, N 3. P. 83–86. Gesellschaft. Bd. 2. S. 14–18. [In Russian]. Germain L. 1931. Mollusques terrestres et flu- Kantor Yu.I., Sysoev A.V. 2005. A Catalog of Mol- viatiles (deuxième partie) // Faune de France. luscs of Russia and Adjacent Territories. Mos- V. 22. P. 479–897. cow: KMK Press. 627 p. [In Russian]. Glaubrecht M. 1996. Evolutionsökologie und Sys- Kantor Yu.I., Vinarski M.V., Schileyko A.A., tematik am Beispiel von Süß- und Brackwas- Sysoev A.V. 2009. Catalogue of the continen- serschnecken (Mollusca: : tal mollusks of Russia and adjacent territories ): Ontogenese-Strategien, paläon- (versions 1.0–2.2). http://www.ruthenica.com/ tologische Befunde und Historische Zoogeog- documents/Continental_Russian_molluscs_ raphie. Leiden: Backhuys Publishers. 544 p. ver2-2 Gradovsky V.M. 1998. Distribution and some pe- Khaliman I.A., Anistratenko V.V., Anistratenko O.Yu. culiarities of ecology of the mollusk families 2006. Molluscs in the north-west part of the Melanopsidae and Lithoglyphidae (Gastropoda, Sea of Azov: fauna, peculiarities of distribu- Pectinibranchia) from currents of right-shore tion and ecology // Vestnik Zoologii (Zoo- Ukraine // Vestnik Zoologii (Zoological Herald, logical Herald, Kiev). V. 40, N 5. P. 397–407. Kiev). V. 32, N 4. P. 67–75. [In Russian]. [In Russian]. Hallgass A. 2010. Checklist Pen. Iberica con sino- Khokhutkin I.M., Vinarski M.V., Grebennikov M.E. nimie // Forum Molluschi terrestri e dulciac- 2009. Molluscs of the Ural and Adjacent Are- quicoli: http://www.naturamediterraneo.com/ as. The family Lymnaeidae (Gastropoda, Pul- forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=40300 monata, Lymnaeiformes). Pt.1. Ekaterinburg: Issel A. 1865. Catalogo dei molluschi raccolti Goshchtskiy Publishers. 162 p. della missione italiana in Persia agguntavi la Košel V. 2009. Molluscs fauna (Mollusca) of the descrizione delle specie nuove e poco note // Old Danube riverbed (1997–2005) and its per- Memorie della Reale Accademia delle Scienze spectives. http://www.gabcikovo.gov.sk/doc/ di Torino, Series 2. V. 23. P. 387–439. moson/kapitola5_2b.htm Izzatullaev Z. 1972. On the fauna of freshwater mol- Kozhov M.M. 1936. Molluscs of Lake Baikal. Taxo- luscs of the Hissar Range and adjacent regions nomy, distribution, ecology, some data on of Tajikistan // Izvestiya of the Akademii Nauk genesis and history // Travaux de la Station Tajikskoy SSR, Otdeleniye biologicheskikh Limnologique du Lac Bajkal. V. 8. P. 1–320. nauk. V. 3, N 48. P. 44–49. [In Russian]. [In Russian]. Izzatullaev Z.I., Kruglov N.D., Starobogatov Ya.I. Krivosheina L.V., Starobogatov Ya.I. 1973. Com- 1983. New and little-known species of mol- position and zoogeographic character of the luscs of the subgenus Radix of the genus freshwater malacofauna of mountain region Lymnaea of the USSR fauna from the Cen- of the Upper Irtush River basin // Zoologi- tral Asia (Gastropoda, Pulmonata) // Izvestiya cal Journal, Moscow. V. 22, N 3. P. 348–355. Akademii Nauk Tajikskoy SSR, Otdelenie [In Russian]. biologicheskikh nauk, V. 4, N 93. P. 53–57. Kruglov N.D. 2005. Molluscs of the Family Lym- [In Russian]. naeidae (Gastropoda, Pulmonata) in Europe Izzatullaev Z.I., Starobogatov Ya.I. 1984. The ge- and Northern Asia. Smolensk: SGPU Publ. nus Melanopsis (Gastropoda, Pectinibranchia) 507 p. [In Russian]. and its representatives in water bodies of the Kruglov N.D., Maksimova T.I. 2000. Experimental USSR // Zoological Journal, Moscow. V. 63, investigation of the reproductive isolation of N 10. P. 1471–1483. [In Russian]. molluscs Planorbarius corneus и P. adelosius Izzatulaev Z.I., Starobogatov Ya.I. 1985. Zoogeo- (Gastropoda Pulmonata). // Lectures in Mem- graphic characteristic of freshwater mollusks ory of Prof. V.V.Stanchinski, Smolensk. N 3. of Central Asia and the problem of existence P. 141–144. [In Russian]. of Asian-mountainous subprovince of the Pa- Kruglov N.D., Soldatenko E.V. 2000. The new data laearctic // Zoological Journal, Moscow. V. 64, on species of the subgenus Gyraulus of the N 4. P. 506–517. [In Russian]. genus Anisus from European part of Russia

110 and adjacent territories (Gastropoda, Planorbi- Meier-Brook C. 1983. Taxonomic studies on Gyra- dae) // Ruthenica (Russian Malacological Jour- ulus (Gastropoda: Planorbidae) // Malacologia. nal). V. 10, N 2. P. 113–120. [In Russian]. V. 24, N 1/2. P. 1–113. Kruglov N.D., Starobogatov Ya.I. 1983. Endemic Mezhzherin S.V., Garbar D.A., Garbar A.V. 2005. Lymnaea of the subgenus Peregriana in the Systematic structure of the Planorbarius Siberian subregion of Palearctic // Molluscs, corneus s.l. complex (Gastropoda, Pulmo- Taxonomy, Ecology and Regularities of Dis- nata): analysis of allozyme markers and mor- tribution: Abstracts of the All-Soviet Meet- phometric traits. // Vestnik Zoologii (Zoo- ing on Study of Molluscs. Leningrad: Nauka. logical Herald, Kiev). V. 39, N 6. P. 11–17. P. 139–141. [In Russian]. [In Russian]. Kruglov N.D., Starobogatov Ya.I. 1985. Method of Moskvicheva I.M. 1979. On the taxonomy of Vivipa- experimental hybridization and some resilts of ridae from the Far East of the USSR // Proceed- its application in the taxonomy of Lymnaeidae ings of the Zoological Institute, USSR Academy (Gastropoda: Pulmonata) // Malacological Re- of Sciences V. 80. P. 87–92. [In Russian]. view. N 18. P. 21–35. Nekhaev I.O. 2011. Geographic distribution fea- Kruglov N.D., Starobogatov Ya.I. 1989. Morpho- tures of subgenera and life forms of Lym- logy and taxonomy of molluscs of the subgenus naeidae (Gastropoda, Pulmonata) in Eastern Radix of the genus Lymnaea (Gastropoda, Pul- Europe // Transactions of the Russian Academy monata, Lymnaeidae) of Siberia and Far East of Sciences, Series Biological. N 4. P. 477–483. of the USSR // Zoological Journal, Moscow. [In Russian]. V. 68, N 5. P. 17–30. [In Russian]. Pershko I. 2003. The complex analysis of concho- Kruglov N.D., Starobogatov Ya.I. 1991. Unknown logical characteristics of shell in subgenera egg-masses of mollusks of the genus Lymnaea Fagotia and Microcolpia (Pectinibranchia, (Gastropoda Pulmonata Lymnaeidae) // Bulletin Melanopsidae) // Vysnyk L’vivskogo Univer- of the Moscow Society of Naturalists, Biological sitetu. Seriya Biologichna. N 33. P. 91–98. Series. V. 96, N 6. P. 82–88. [In Russian]. [In Ukrainian]. Kruglov N.D., Starobogatov Ya.I. 1993. Annota- Pershko I. 2011. Karyological features of repre- ted and illustrated catalogue of species of the sentatives of genera Fagotia and Microcol- family Lymnaeidae (Gastropoda Pulmonata pia (Gastropoda, Pectinibranchia, Melanop- Lymnaeiformes) of Palaearctic and adjacent sidae) // Vysnyk Lvivskogo Universitu. Seriya river drainage areas. Part 1 (Guide to Recent biologichna. Issue 56. P. 91–98. molluscs of northern Eurasia. 3) // Ruthenica Pershko I.A., Bondarchuk Yu.M. 2001. On the first (Russian Malacological Journal). V. 3, N 1. discovery of Fagotia danubialis (Mollusca: P. 65–91. Pectinibranchia: Melanopsidae) in the Sluch // Lazareva A.I. 1967. On the systematics of freshwa- Visnyk Zhitomirskogo Derzhavnogo Peda- ter snails of Kazakhstan from the group Lym- gogichnogo Universitetu. N 10. P. 100–101. naea palustris Müller (Gastropoda, Pulmona- [In Ukrainian]. ta) // Zoological Journal, Moscow. V. 46, N 9. Pirogov V.V., Tarasov A.G., Kazantseva S.Z. 1994. P. 1340–1349. [In Russian]. Malacofauna of typical waterbodies of the mid- Lindholm W.A. 1909. Die Mollusken des Baikal- dle and lower Ural River // Ruthenica (Russian Sees (Gastropoda et Pelecypoda) systematisch Malacological Journal). V. 4, N 1. P. 61–65. und zoogeographisch bearb // Wissenschaftli- Prozorova L.A. 1998. Annotated list of Beringian che Ergebnisse einer zoologische Expedition freshwater molluscs // Bulletin of the Russian nach dem Baikal-See unter Leitung des Prof. Far East Malacolocal Society. V. 2. P. 2–28. Alexis Korotneff i. d. J. 1900–1902, 4. Kiew, Prozorova L.A. 2000. Annotated list of water mollscs Berlin: Fridländer und Sohn. S. 1–104. of the Khanka Lake drainage // Bulletin of the Locard A. 1893. Les coquilles des eaux Douces et Russian Far East Malacological Society. V. 4. Saumâtres de France: Description des Familles, P. 10–29. [In Russian with English abstract]. Genres et Espèces. Paris: J.B. Baillière et fils. Prozorova L.A. 2001. Species composition and dis- 329 p. tribution of freshwater malacofauna in the ba- Maksimova T.I. 1995. Morphological and Genetic sin of lower reaches of the Tumen River // The Analysis of the Molluscan Family Bulinidae State of Environment and Biota of the South- (Gastropoda, Pulmonata) of the Fauna of Rus- western Part of Peter the Great Bay and the Tu- sia and Adjacent Territories: Abstract of the men River Mouth. V.L. Kasyanov et al. (Eds.). PhD Thesis. S.-Petersburg. 28 p. [In Russian]. Vol. 2. Vladivostok: Dalnauka. P. 52–68.

111 Prozorova L.A. 2003. Taxonomy and species compo- Servain G. 1881. Histoire Malacologique du lac sition of the genus Anisus Studer (Gastropoda, Balaton en Hongrie. Poissy: Imp. S. Lejay Planorbidae) in the fauna of Russia // Bulletin et Co. 125 p. of the Russian Far East Malacological Society. Şeşen R., Schütt H. 2009. The freshwater proso- V. 7. P. 99–115. [In Russian]. branch snails Fagotia in Turkey // Dicle Üni- Prozorova L.A. 2005. Freshwater and terrestrial versitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. mollusks of the Tauysk Bay coastal area // N 12. P. 202–206. Biodiversity of the Tauysk Bay of the Sea of Shadin V.I. 1952. Mollusca of fresh and brackish Okhotsk. I.A. Chereshnev (Ed.). Vladivostok: waters of the USSR // Guide-books on Fauna Dalnauka. P. 252–261. [In Russian]. of the USSR Published by the Zoological In- Prozorova L.A., Kolpakov E.V. 2004. Distributional stitute, USSR Academy of Sciences. V. 43. patterns of the freshwater mollusks in the P. 1–346. [In Russian]. northeast Primorye (southern Russian Far East, Shikhova T.G. 2004. Molluscan Fauna of Vyatka Primorye Territory) // Abstracts of the Confe- and Vyatka-Dvina Watershed Area: Abstract rence Mollusks of the Northern Asia and north- of the PhD Thesis. St.-Petersburg. 26 p. ern Pacific: Biodiversity, Ecology, Biogeogra- [In Russian]. phy and Faunal History, October 4–6, 2004, Sitnikova T.Ya., Starobogatov Ya.I., Shirokaya A.A., Vladivostok, Russia. Vladivostok: Dalnauka. Shibanova I.V., Korobkova N.V., Adov F.V. 2004. P. 121–123. Gastropod molluscs (Gastropoda) // Index of Prozorova L.A., Sharyi-Ool M.O. 1999. Aquatic pul- Species Inhabiting Lake Baikal and its monate molluscs (Gastropoda, Pulmonata) of Catchment Area. Vol. 1. Book 2. Novosibirsk: Tuva // Bulletin of the Russian Far East Malaco- Nauka. P. 937–1002. [In Russian]. logical Society. V. 3. P. 11–25. [In Russian]. Smolen M., Falniowski A. 2009. Molecular phylo- Prozorova L.A., Shed’ko M.V. 2003. Mollusca of geny and estimated time of divergence in the the Lake Azabach’ye (Kamchatka) and their Central European Melanopsidae: Melanopsis, biocenotic significance // Proceedings of Kam- Fagotia and Holandriana (Mollusca: Gastrop- chatka Branch of the Pacific Institute of Geo- oda, Cerithioidea) // Folia Malacologica. V. 17, graphy, Far East Branch, Russian Academy of N 1. P. 1–9. Sciences. V. 4. P. 120–151. [In Russian]. Soldatenko E., Sitnikova T. 2009. Organization of Prozorova L.A., Zasypkina M.O. 2005. Freshwater stylets of mollusсs of the genera Gyraulus and mollusks of the Khilok River (Selenga River Choanomphalus (Pulmonata: Planorbidae) // drainage, east Lake Baikal Region) // Vladimir Proceedings of the Zoological Institute, Russian Ya. Levanidov’s Bienial Memorial Meetings. Academy of Sciences. V. 313, N 1. P. 68–73. Vol. 3. Vladivostok: Dalnauka. P. 295–301. [In Russian]. Prozorova L.A., Sitnikova T.Ya., Zasypkina M.O., Soldatenko E.V., Starobogatov Ya.I. 2000. Genus Маtafonov P.O., Dulmaa A. 2009. Chapter 16. Planorbis (Gastropoda Pulmonata Planor- Freshwater Gastropoda in the basin of Lake bidae) // Ruthenica (Russian Malacological Baikal and adjacent territories // Index of Ani- Journal). V.10, N 1. P. 23–35. mal Species Inhabiting Lake Baikal and its Soldatenko E.V., Starobogatov Ya.I. 2004. Genus Catchment Area. Vol. 2. Basins and Channels Ancylus Müller, 1774 (Gastropoda, Planorbi- in the South of East Siberia and North Mongo- dae) // Ruthenica (Russian Malacological Jour- lia. Book 1. Part 1. Water Bodies in the Basin nal). V. 14, N 1. P. 37–56. [In Russian]. of Lake Baikal. O.A. Timoshkin (Ed.). Novosi- Stadnichenko A.P. 2004. Lymnaeidae and Acroloxi- birsk: Nauka. 2009. P. 170–188. [In Russian]. dae of Ukraine. Kiev: Centre of Training Lite- Prydatko V. 2006. New species observation area in rature. 327 p. 1990s based on scientific publications // http:// Starobogatov Ya.I. 1970. Molluscan Fauna and www.ulrmc.org.ua/services/eebio/is/PDF/ Zoogeographic Zonation of Continental Fresh- New_species_location_90s_p1.pdf water Bodies of the World. Leningrad: Nauka. Röpstorf P., Sitnikova T.Ya., Timoshkin O.A., 372 p. Pomazkina G.V. 2003. Observation on sto- Starobogatov Ya. I. 1977. Class Gastropoda // Guide mach contents, food uptake and feeding stra- to Identification of Freshwater Invertebrates of tegies of endemic Baikalian gastropods // Ber- European Part of the USSR. L.A. Kutikova, liner Palaobiologische Abhandlungen. Bd. 4. Ya.I. Starobogatov (Eds.). Leningrad: Gidro- P. 151–156. meteoizdat. P. 166–169. [In Russian].

112 Starobogatov Ya.I., Alexenko T.L., Levina O.V. 1992. Vinarski M.V., Glöer P. 2009. Taxonomical notes The genera Fagotia and Microcolpia (Gastro- on Euro-Siberian freshwater molluscs. 4. Re- poda, Pectinibranchia, Melanopsidae), and examination of Lymnaea psilia Bourguignat, their representatives in Recent fauna // Bulletin 1862, with the description of Radix parapsi- of the Moscow Society of Naturalists, Biologi- lia n.sp. (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Lymnaei- cal Series. V. 97, N 3. P. 57–92. [In Russian]. dae) // Archiv für Molluskenkunde. Bd. 138, Starobogatov Ya.I., Prozorova L.A. 1990. Species N 2. S. 123–136. composition of the family Bulinidae (Gas- Westerlund C.A. 1885. Fauna der in der Paläark- tropoda. Pulmonata) in the waterbodies of the tischen Region (Europa, Kaukasien, Sibi- USSR (with notes on the system of subfamily rien, Turan, Persien, Kurdistan, Armenien, Camptoceratinae) // Zoological Journal, Mos- Mesopotamien, Kleinasien, Syrien, Arabien, cow. V. 69, N 4. P. 27–37. [In Russian]. Egypten, Tripolis, Tunisien, Algerien und Starobogatov Ya.I., Prozorova L.A., Bogatov V.V., Marocco) lebenden Binnenconchylien. V. Saenko E.M. 2004. Molluscs // Keys to Fresh- Fam. Succineidae, Auriculidae, Limnaeidae, water Invertebrates of Russia and Adjacent Cyclostomidae und Hydrocenidae. Lund: H. Lands. Vol. 6. Molluscs, Polychaetes, Nemer- teans. S.J. Tsalolikhin (Ed.). S.-Peterburg: Ohlsson. 135+14 p. Nauka. P. 9–491. [In Russian]. Yıldırım M.Z., Koca S.B., Kebapçı Ü. 2006. Supple- Starobogatov Ya.I., Sitnikova T.Ya. 1992. Process ment to the Prosobranchia (Mollusca: Gas- of speciation in ancient lakes // Ecological In- tropoda) fauna of fresh and brackish waters of vestigations of Lake Baikal and Baikal region. Turkey // Turkish Journal of Zoology. N 30. Part 1. O.M. Kozhova (Ed.). Irkutsk: Irkutsk P. 197–204. State University. P. 18–53. [In Russian]. Yurlova N.I., Vodyanitzkaya S.N. 2005. Long-term Vinarski M.V., Andreev N.I., Andreeva S.I., Lazut- changes in species composition and abundance kina E.A., Karimov A.V. 2007 [2008]. Diver- of pulmonate molluscs (Gastropoda, Pulmo- sity of gastropods in the inland waterbodies of nata) in Chany Lake (south of West Siberia) // Western Siberia // Invertebrate Zoology. V. 4, Siberian Ecological Journal. N 2. P. 255–266. N 2. P. 173–183. [In Russian]. Appendix List of the Russian and Ukrainian References in Cyrillic Список русско-украинский литературы2

Андреева С.И., Андреев Н.И., Винарский М.В. особенности биологии как функция режима 2010. Определитель пресноводных брю- солености // Ruthenica (Русский малаколо- хоногих моллюсков Западной Сибири. Ча- гический журнал). Т. 18, № 1. С. 9–16. шечковые и Прудовиковые. Омск: Омская Анистратенко В.В., Стадниченко А.П. 1994 областная типография. 200 с. [1995]. Литторинообразные, риссоиобраз- Анистратенко В.В. 1991. Моллюски группы ные // Фауна Украины. Т. 29. Моллюски. Hydrobia sensu lato Черного и Азовского Вып. 1, Книга 2. Киев: Наукова Думка. 175 с. морей // Бюллетень Московского общества Анистратенко О.Ю., Старобогатов Я.И., испытателей природы. Отдел биологиче- Анистратенко В.В. 1999. Моллюски рода ский. Т. 96, № 6. С. 73–81. Theodoxus (Gastropoda, Pectinibranchia, Ne- Анистратенко В.В. 1998. Определитель греб- ritidae) Азово-Черноморского бассейна // нежаберных моллюсков (Gastropoda, Pec- Вестник зоологии. Т. 33, №. 3. С. 11–19. tinibranchia) фауны Украины. Часть 2. Прес- Бекман М.Ю., Старобогатов Я.И. 1975. Бай- новодные и наземные // Вестник зоологии. кальские глубоководные моллюски и № 8. С. 67–117. родственные им формы // Труды Лим- Анистратенко В.В., Анистратенко О.Ю., Хали- нологического института СО АН СССР. ман И.А. 2008. Брюхоногие моллюски Азов- Т. 18. С. 92–111. (Новое о фауне Байкала. ского моря: зоогеографический состав и Часть 1).

2 Список литературы на русском языке приведен для облегчения библиографических поисков русско- язычными исследователями (ред.).

113 Богатов В.В., Затравкин М.Н. 1990 [1992]. Брю- территорий. (versions 1.0–2.2). http://www. хоногие моллюски пресных и солоноватых ruthenica.com/documents/Continental_Rus- вод Дальнего Востока СССР: Определитель. sian_molluscs_ver2-2, 323 p. Владивосток: ДВО АН СССР. 169 с. Кожов М.М. 1936. Моллюски озера Байкал. Винарский М.В., Андреев Н.И., Андреева С.И., Таксономия, распространение, экология и Лазуткина Е.А., Каримов А.В. 2007 [2008]. некоторые сведения о генезисе и истории // Разнообразие брюхоногих моллюсков Труды Байкальской лимнологической стан- в континентальных водоемах западной ции. Т. 8. С. 1–320. Сибири // Зоология беспозвоночных. Т. 4, Кривошеина Л.В., Старобогатов Я.И. 1973. Со- № 2. С. 173–183. став и зоогеографическая характеристика Градовский В.М. 1998. Распространение и не- пресноводной малакофауны горной части которые особенности экологии моллюсков бассейна верхнего Иртыша // Зоологиче- семейств Melanopsidae и Lithoglyphidae ский журнал. Т. 22, вып. 3. С. 348–355. (Gastropoda, Pectinibranchia) в водотоках Круглов Н.Д. 2005. Моллюски семейства прудо- Правобережной Украины // Вестник зооло- виков (Lymnaeidae Gastropoda Pulmonata) гии. Т. 32, № 4. С. 67–75. Европы и северной Азии. Смоленск: Изд-во Жадин В.И. 1952. Моллюски пресных и солоно- СПГУ. 507 c. ватых вод СССР // Определители по фауне Круглов Н.Д., Максимова Т.И. 2000. Экспери- СССР, издаваемые Зоологическим институ- ментальное изучение репродуктивной изо- том АН СССР. Т. 43. С. 1–346. ляции моллюсков Planorbarius corneus и Иззатуллаев З. 1972. К фауне пресноводных мол- P. adelosius (Gastropoda: Pulmonata) // Чте- люсков Гиссарского хребта и сопредельных ния памяти профессора В.В. Станчинского, районов Таджикистана // Известия Акаде- Смоленск. № 3. С. 141–144. мии наук Таджикской ССР. Отделение био- Круглов Н.Д., Солдатенко Е.В. 2000. Новые дан- логических наук. Т. 3, № 48. С. 44–49. ные о видах подрода Gyraulus рода Anisus Европейской части России и сопредельных Иззатуллаев З.И., Круглов Н.Д., Старобога- территорий (Gastropoda Planorbidae) // Ru- тов Я.И. 1983. Новые и малоизвестные thenica (Русский малакологический жур- виды моллюсков подрода Radix рода Lym- нал). Т. 10, № 2. С. 113–120. naea фауны СССР и Средней Азии (Gastro- Круглов Н.Д., Старобогатов Я.И. 1983. Энде- poda, Pulmonata) // Известия Академии наук мичные Lymnaea подрода Peregriana в Си- Таджикской ССР. Отделение биологических бирской подобласти Палеарктики // Мол- наук. Т. 4, № 93. С. 53–57. люски. Систематика, экология и законо- Иззатуллаев З.И., Старобогатов Я.И. 1984. мерности распространения: Авторефераты Род Melanopsis (Gastropoda, Pectinibranchia) докладов. Ленинград: Наука. С. 139–141. и его представители, обитающие в водо- Круглов Н.Д., Старобогатов Я.И. 1989. Мор- емах СССР // Зоологический журнал. Т. 63, фология и систематика моллюсков подрода вып. 10. С. 1471–1483. Radix рода Lymnaea (Gastropoda Pulmonata Иззатулаев З.И., Старобогатов Я.И. 1985. Зоо- Lymnaeidae) Сибири и Дальнего Востока географическая характеристика пресно- СССР // Зоологический журнал. Т. 68, водных моллюсков Центральной Азии и вып. 5. С. 17–30. вопрос о существовании Нагорноазиатской Круглов Н.Д., Старобогатов Я.И. 1991. Неиз- подобласти Палеарктики // Зоологический вестные кладки яиц моллюсков рода Lym- журнал. Т. 64, вып. 4. С. 506–517. naea (Gastropoda Pulmonata Lymnaeidae) // Иззатулаев З.И., Стадниченко А.П. 2010. Рас- Бюллетень Московского общества испыта- пределение водных моллюсков Средней телей природы. Отдел биологический. Т. 96, Азии по биотопам и водоемам различных № 6. С. 82–88. типов // Науковi записки Тернопольского Лазарева А.И. 1967. О систематике прудовиков національний педагогічний университету Казахстана из группы Lymnaea palustris им. В. Гнатюка. Серия Биология. Спец. вы- Müller (Gastropoda, Pulmonata) // Зоологиче- пуск. Гидроэкология. Т. 2, № 3. С. 83–86. ский журнал. Т. 46, вып. 9. С. 1340–1349. Кантор Ю.И., Сысоев А.В. 2005. Каталог моллю- Максимова Т.И. 1995. Морфологический и ге- сков России и сопредельных стран. Москва: нетический анализ моллюсков семейства КМК. 627 с. Bulinidae (Gastropoda, Pulmonata) фауны Кантор Ю.И., Сысоев А.В., Винарский М.В., России и сопредельных территорий: Авто- Шилейко А.А. 2009. Каталог континенталь- реферат диссертации … кандидата биологи- ных моллюсков России и сопредельных ческих наук. С.-Петербург. 28 с.

114 Москвичева И.М. 1979. К систематике моллю- Охотского моря. Владивосток: Дальнаука. сков семейства Viviparidae Дальнего Восто- С. 252–261. ка СССР // Труды Зоологического института Прозорова Л.А., Засыпкина М.О. 2005. Пресно- АН СССР. Т. 80. С. 87–92. водные моллюски р. Хилок (бассейн р. Се- Межжерин С.В., Гарбар Д.А., Гарбар О.В. 2005. ленга, Забайкалье) // Чтения памяти проф. Систематическая структура комплекса Pla- В.Я. Леванидова. Вып. 3. Владивосток: norbarius corneus (Linaeus, 1758) s.lato: ана- Дальнаука. С. 295–301. лиз аллозимных маркеров и морфометриче- Прозорова Л.А., Шарый-Оол М.О. 1999. Водные ских признаков // Вестник зоологии. Т. 39, легочные моллюски (Gastropoda, Pulmonata) № 6. С. 11–17. Тувы // Бюллетень Дальневосточного мала- Нехаев И.О. 2011. Особенности географическо- кологического общества. Т. 3. С. 11–25. го распространения подродов и жизненных Прозорова Л.А., Ситникова Т.Я., Засыпкина М.О., форм Lymnaeidae (Gastropoda, Pulmonata) в Матафонов П.В., Дулмаа A. 2009 (2010). Восточной Европе // Известия Российской Глава 16. Пресноводные брюхоногие мол- академии наук. Серия биологическая. № 4. люски (Gastropoda) бассейна оз. Байкал и С. 477–483. прилегающих территорий // Аннотирован- Першко И. 2003. Комплексний аналiз конхiоло- ный список фауны Байкала и его водосбор- гiчних ознак черепашок особин родiв Fago- ного бассейна. Том 2. Водоемы и водотоки tia и Microcolpia (Pectinibranchia, Melanop- юга Восточной Сибири и Северной Монго- sidae) // Biсник Львiвського унiверситету. лии. Книга 1. Часть 1. Водные объекты бас- Серія біологічна. Вып. 33. С. 91–98. сейна озера Байкал. Новосибирск: Наука. Першко І.О., Бондарчук Ю.М. 2001. Перше зна- С. 170–188. ходження Fagotia danubialis (Mollusca: Pec- Ситникова Т.Я., Старобогатов Я.И., Широкая А.А., tinibranchia: Melanopsidae) в Случі // Biсник Шибанова И.В., Коробкова Н.В., Адов Ф.В. Житомирського державного педагогичного 2004. Брюхоногие моллюски (Gastro- poda) // Аннотированный список фауны університету. Вып.10. С. 100–101. озера Байкал и его водосборного бассей- Першко I. 2011. Особливостi карiологiï представ- на. Том 1. Книга 2. Новосибирск: Наука. никiв родiв Fagotia и Microcolpia (Gastropo- С. 937–1002. da, Pectinibranchia, Melanopsidae) // Biсник Солдатенко Е.В., Ситникова Т.Я. 2009. Особен- Львiвського унiверситету. Серiя біологічна. ности строения стилетов моллюсков родов Вып. 56. С. 91–98. Gyraulus и Choanomphalus (Pulmonata: Pla- Прозорова Л.А. 2000. Аннотированный список norbidae) // Труды Зоологического институ- водных моллюсков бассейна озера Ханка // та РАН. Т. 313, № 1. С. 68–73. Бюллетень Дальневосточного малакологи- Солдатенко Е.В., Старобогатов Я.И. 2004. Род ческого общества. Т. 4. С. 10–29. Ancylus Müller, 1774 (Gastropoda, Planorbi- Прозорова Л.А. 2001. Видовой состав и распреде- dae) // Ruthenica (Русский малакологический ление пресноводной малакофауны в бассей- журнал). Т. 14, № 1. С. 37–56. не нижнего течения реки Туманной // Эко- Стадниченко А.П. 2004. Прудовиковые и чашеч- логическое состояние и биота юго-западной ковые (Lymnaeidae, Acroloxidae) Украины. части залива Петра Великого и устья реки Киев: Изд-во «Центр учебной литературы». Туманной. Том 2. Владивосток: Дальнаука. 327 с. С. 52–68. Старобогатов Я.И. 1970. Фауна моллюсков и Прозорова Л.А., Шедько М.Б. 2003. Моллюски зоогеографическое районирование конти- озера Азабачье и их биоценотическое зна- нентальных водоемов земного шара. Л.: чение // Труды Камчатского филиала Тихо- Наука. 372 с. океанского института географии ДВО РАН. Старобогатов Я.И. 1977. Класс Gastropoda // Петропавловск-Камчатский: Камчатский Определитель пресноводных беспозвоноч- печатный двор. С. 120–151. ных европейской части СССР. Л.: Гидроме- Прозорова Л.А. 2003. Таксономическая струк- теоиздат. С. 166–169. тура и видовой состав рода Anisus Studer Старобогатов Я.И., Алексеенко Т.Л., Левина О.В. (Gastropoda, Planorbidae) в фауне России // 1992. Роды Fagotia и Microcolpia (Gastro- Бюллетень Дальневосточного малакологи- poda, Pectinibranchia, Melanopsidae) и их ческого общества. Т. 7. С. 99–115. представители в современной фауне // Бюл- Прозорова Л.А. 2005. Пресноводные и назем- летень Московского общества испытателей ные моллюски побережья Тауйской губы // природы. Отдел биологический. Т. 97, № 3. Биологическое разнообразие Тауйской губы С. 57–92.

115 Старобогатов Я.И., Прозорова Л.А. 1990. части Азовского моря: фауна, особенности Видовой состав семейства Bulinidae (Gas- распространения и экологии // Вестник зоо- tropoda, Pulmonata) в водоемах СССР (с за- логии. Т. 40, № 5. С. 397–407. мечаниями по системе подсемейства Camp- Хохуткин И.М., Винарский М.В., Гребенников М.Е. toceratinae) // Зоологический журнал. Т. 69, 2009. Моллюски Урала и прилегающих вып. 4. С. 27–37. территорий. Семейство Прудовиковые Старобогатов Я.И., Прозорова Л.А., Бога- Lymnaeidae (Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Lym- тов В.В., Саенко Е.М. 2004. Моллюски // naeiformes). Часть 1. Екатеринбург: Гоциц- Определитель пресноводных беспозвоноч- кий. 156 с. ных России и сопредельных территорий. Шихова Т.Г. 2004. Фауна моллюсков бассейна Том 6. Моллюски, полихеты, немертины. Вятки и Вятско-Двинской водораздельной С.-Петербург: Наука. С. 9–491. области: Автореферат диссертации … канди- Старобогатов Я.И., Ситникова Т.Я. 1992. Про- дата биологических наук. С.-Петербург. 26 с. цесс видообразования в древних озерах // эко- Юрлова Н.И., Водяницкая С.Н. 2005. Много- логические исследования Байкала и байкаль- летние изменения видового состава и чис- ского региона. Часть 1. Иркутск: Иркутский ленности легочных моллюсков (Gastropoda, государственный университет. С. 18–53. Pulmonata) в озере Чаны (юг Западной Си- Халиман И.А., Анистратенко В.В., Анистратен- бири) // Сибирский экологический журнал. ко О.Ю. 2006. Моллюски северо-западной № 2. С. 255–266.

116