Manhattan Guide Magazine.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Manhattan Guide Magazine.Pdf Traveling Magazine: Travel Anywhere EASY GOGO New York City A Brief Look. Spring 2008 History Colonial American Revolution and the early United States March, 19th century growth 2008 The 20th century New York City A Brief Look. Spring 2008 Manhattan is an island borough of New York City, New York, USA, coterminous with New York County. With a 2000 population of 1,537,195[1} living in a land area of 22.96 square miles (59.47 km), it is the most densely populated county in the United States at 66,940 residents per square mile (25,846/km).[2] The borough consists of Manhattan Island, Roosevelt Island, Randalls Island, almost 1/10th of Ellis Island,[3] the above-water portion of Liberty Island, several much smaller islands, and a small section on the mainland of New York State adjacent to the Bronx. Manhattan is the commercial, financial, and cultural center of the United States and, to varying extents, of the world.[4][5][6] Manhattan has many famous landmarks, tourist attractions, museums, and universities. It is also home to the headquarters of the United Nations. Manhattan has the largest central business district in the United States, is the site of both the New York Stock Exchange and NASDAQ, and is the home the west and east sides of the Mauritius River to the largest number of corporate headquarters in (later named the Hudson River). The word the nation. It is indisputably the center of “Manhattan” has been translated as “island of New York City and the New York metropolitan many hills” from the Lenape language.[8] The region, holding the seat of city government, Encyclopedia of New York City offers other and the largest fraction of employment, business, derivations, including from Munsee language and recreational activities. words manahachtanienk (“place of general inebriation”), manahatouh (“place where timber The name Manhattan derives from the word is procured for bows and arrows”), or menatay Manna-hata, as written in the 1609 logbook (“island”).[9] of Robert Juet, an officer on Henry Hudson’s yacht Halve Maen (Half Moon).[7] A 1610 map depicts the name Manahata twice, on both 1 A Brief Look. EASYGOGO History Colonial The area that is now Man- hattan was long inhabited by the Lenape. In 1524, Lenape in canoes met Giovanni da Verrazzano, the first European explorer to pass New York Harbor, although he did not enter the harbor past the Narrows.[10] It was not until the voyage of Henry Hudson, an Englishman who worked for the Dutch East India Company, that the area was mapped.[11] Hudson came across Manhattan Island and the native people living there on September 11, 1609, and continued up the river that bears his name, the Hudson River, until he arrived at the site of present day Albany. [12]A permanent European presence in New Netherland began in 1624 with the founding of a Dutch fur trading settlement on Governors Island. In 1625 construction was started on a citadel and a Fort Amsterdam on [16] In 1647, Peter Stuyvesant of provisional transfer with Manhattan Island, later called was appointed as the last the British which sought to New Amsterdam (Nieuw Am- Dutch Director General of guarantee New Netherlanders sterdam).[13][14] Manhattan the colony.[17] The colony liberties, including freedom Island was chosen as the site was granted self-government of religion, under British rule. of Fort Amsterdam, a citadel in 1652 and New Amsterdam [20][21] for the protection of the new was formally incorporated as arrivals; its 1625 establishment a city on February 2, 1653.[18] is recognized as the birth In 1664, the British traded the date of New York City.[15] area against Suriname and In 1626, Peter Minuit acquired renamed it “New York” after Manhattan from native people the English Duke of York and in exchange for trade goods, Albany.[19] Stuyvesant and often said to be worth $24. his council negotiated 24 articles EASYGOGO History Colonial. 2 American Revolution and The Early United States Manhattan was at the heart of the New York Campaign, a series of major battles in the early American Revolutionary War. The Continental Army was forced to abandon Manhattan after the disastrous Battle of Fort Washington on November 16, 1776. The city became the British political and military center of operations in North America for the remainder of the war.[22] Manhattan was greatly damaged by the Great Fire of New York during the British military rule that followed. British occupation lasted until November 25, 1783, when George Washington returned to Manhattan, as the last British forces left the city.[23] From January 11, 1785 to Autumn 1788, New York City was the fifth of five capitals under the Articles of Confederation, with the Continental Congress residing city in the United States. Tammany Hall, a at New York City Hall then at Fraunces Democratic Party political machine, began to Tavern. New York was the first capital grow in influence with the support of many of under the newly enacted Constitution of the immigrant Irish, culminating in the election the United States, from March 4, 1789 to of the first Tammany mayor, Fernando Wood, in August 12, 1790 at Federal Hall.[24] 1854. Tammany Hall dominated local politics for decades. Central Park, which opened to the public in 1858, became the first landscaped park in an American city and the nation’s first public park.[25][26] During the American Civil War, 19th Century Growth the city’s strong commercial ties to the South, its growing immigrant population (prior to then largely from Germany and Ireland), anger New York grew as an economic center, first about conscription and resentment at those who as a result of Alexander Hamilton’s policies and could afford to pay $300 to avoid service, led practices as the first Secretary of the Treasury to resentment against Lincoln’s war policies, culminating and, later, with the opening of the Erie Canal in the three-day long New York Draft Riots of in 1825, which connected the Atlantic port to July 1863, one of the worst incidents of civil the vast agricultural markets of the Midwestern disorder in American history, with an estimated United States and Canada. By 1810, New York 119 participants and passersby massacred.[27] City had surpassed Philadelphia as the largest After the Civil War, the rate of immigration 3 American Revolution. EASYGOGO from Europe grew steeply, and New York created Bronx County, and New York County became the first stop for millions seeking a new was reduced to its present boundaries.[31] and better life in the United States, a role acknowledged by the dedication of the Statue of Liberty on October 28, 1886, a gift from the people of France.[28][29] The new European immigration brought further social upheaval. In a city of tenements packed with poorly paid laborers from dozens of nations, the city was a hotbed of revolution, syndicalism, racketeering, and unionization. In 1883, the opening of the Brooklyn Bridge established a surface connection across the East River. In 1874, the western portion of the present Bronx County was transferred to New York County, and in 1895 the remainder of the present Bronx County was annexed.[30] The City of Greater New York was formed in 1898, with Manhattan and the Bronx, though still one county, established as two separate boroughs. On January 1, 1914, the New York State Legislature EASYGOGO 19th Century Growth. 4 The 20th Century The construction of the time in the Prohibition era affluence to the working New York City Subway, first that saw dueling skyscrapers class, the city’s government opened in 1904, helped bind in the skyline. New York City and infrastructure underwent the new city together, as did became the most populous a dramatic overhaul under additional bridges to Brooklyn. city in the world in 1925, LaGuardia. Despite the effects In the 1920s, Manhattan overtaking London, which of the Great Depression, the saw the increasing influx of had reigned for a century. 1930s saw the building of Blacks as part of the Great [32] On March 25, 1911, the some of the world’s tallest Migration from the American Triangle Shirtwaist Factory skyscrapers, including South, and the Harlem Renais- fire in Greenwich Village numerous Art Deco mas- sance, part of a larger boom took the lives of 146 garment terpieces that are still part workers, which would eventually of the city’s skyline today. lead to great improvements in the city’s fire department, Returning World War II building codes, and workplace veterans and immigrants regulations.[33] from Europe created a postwar economic boom and The period between the led to the development of World Wars saw the election huge housing developments, of reformist mayor Fiorello targeted at returning veterans, LaGuardia and the fall of including Peter Cooper Village— Tammany Hall after eighty Stuyvesant Town which opened years of political dominance. in 1947.[35] In 1951, the [34] As the city’s demographics United Nations relocated stabilized, labor unionization from its first headquarters in brought new protections and Queens, to the East Side of 5 The 20th Century. EASYGOGO Manhattan.[36] Like many major U.S. cities, New York suffered race riots and population and industrial decline in the 1960s. By the 1970s, the city had gained a reputation as a graffiti-covered, crime-ridden relic of history.[37] In 1975, the city government faced imminent bankruptcy, and its appeals for assistance were initially rejected, summarized by the classic October 30, 1975 New York Daily News headline as “Ford to City: Drop Dead”.
Recommended publications
  • 125 Greenwich Street Is a New Residential Skyscraper Designed by World- Renowned Architect, Rafael Viñoly
    AT THE LIVE T0P INTRODUCTION 125 GREENWICH STREET IS A NEW RESIDENTIAL SKYSCRAPER DESIGNED BY WORLD- RENOWNED ARCHITECT, RAFAEL VIÑOLY. THIS CONDOMINIUM OFFERING INCLUDES 273 RESIDENCES RANGING FROM STUDIOS TO THREE-BEDROOM AND PENTHOUSE RESIDENCES, FEATURING ONE-OF-A-KIND INTERIORS BY MARCH & WHITE. THE CROWNING TRIPLEX OF AMENITIES — LOCATED ON THE TOP THREE FLOORS, 912' INTO THE SKY — SPANS DINING, ENTERTAINMENT, FITNESS, POOL AND SPA, EACH WITH SWEEPING VIEWS OF THE NEW DOWNTOWN BELOW. ENJOY THE VIEW. Enhanced Artist Rendering Enhanced Artist Rendering THE LOBBY Past the bronze-plated portico is a triple-height lobby, with a custom chandelier and Arabescato marble FLOOR 1 floors. Equipped with a library, lounge,fireplace and 24-hour concierge, it’s the ultimate welcome home. Enhanced Artist Rendering CORNER LIVING ROOM Entertain in a living room that features 10' floor to ceiling windows, white oak floors, and an interior AQUA FINISH designed with a precise balance of taste, proportion and form. Enhanced Artist Rendering CORNER DINING AREA Enjoy dining in your own private observatory with breathtaking views of the World Trade Center AQUA FINISH and glittering Manhattan cityscape. Enhanced Artist Rendering OPEN KITCHEN The airy, light-filled kitchen is a haven for home chefs. It’s designed in one of three unique finishes — STRATUS FINISH aqua, terra or stratus — each lined with custom cabinetry and integrated Miele appliances. Enhanced Artist Rendering MASTER BATH Calacatta Covelano marble floors with radiant heating. Marble clad vanity tops. TERRA FINISH This luxurious master bathroom elevates everyday life. Enhanced Artist Rendering PENTHOUSE RESIDENCES Indulge in the ultimate Manhattan lifestyle in a masterfully designed penthouse by March & White, AQUA FINISH with stunning city skyline and water views.
    [Show full text]
  • Ora Headquarters Directory
    ORA HEADQUARTERS DIRECTORY Element (ELEM) 12420 Parklawn Drive, Rockville, MD 20852 White Oak (WO) 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20993 Associate Commissioner for Regulatory Affairs, (OACRA) Emergency (after hours) Answering Service - Office of Crisis Management (866) 300-4374, FAX (301) 847-8544 Main Line: (301) 796-8800, FAX (301) 847-8544 Melinda K. Plaisier, Associate Commissioner of Regulatory Affairs, WO31 Rm 3528, (301) 796-8800, FAX (301) 595-7942 Kara Lynch, Science Program Advisor, ELEM Rm 4212 (301) 796-8805 Janice Sheehy, Special Assistant, WO31 Rm 3538, (301) 796-4552, FAX (301) 595-7942 Amy Folden, Special Assistant, WO31 Rm 3536, (301) 796-7427, FAX (301) 595-7942 Laura Ortiz, Program Manager, WO31 Rm 3542, (301) 796-6945, FAX (301) 595-7942 Lauren Franz, Program Analyst, WO31 Rm 3541 (301) 796-4373 FAX, FAX (301) 595-7942 ORA OMBUDSMAN Jessica Zeller, Ombudsman, CIN-DO Rm 050, (513) 679-2777 Office of Human and Animal Food Operations (OHAFO) Michael Rogers, Assistant Commissioner for Human and Animal Food Operations, WO31, Rm 3522, (240) 402-4029 John Gridley, Senior Advisor, Atlanta, GA, 404-253-2261 CDR J. Christopher Yee, HAF Program Emergency Response Coordinator, Oakland, CA, (510) 287-2713 Kimberly Livsey, HAF Program Emergency Response Coordinator, Atlanta, GA (202) 253-1273 Jennifer Flowers, Executive Assistant, WO31, Rm 3532A, (301) 796-4128 ORA Audit Staff Ellen Buchanan, Director, Indianapolis, IN. (240) 402-0443 Human and Animal Food (HAF) Program HAF- IO West Joann Givens, Program Director, West, WO, Rm 2528, (301) 796-7761, FAX (301) 595-7942 Glenn Bass, Senior Advisor, ELEM Rm 3008, (240) 402-4894, FAX (301) 827-3588 Lisa Romano, Senior Advisor, Rm 34003-18 (NWE-DO), (301) 796-5762, FAX (301) 443-1778 CAPT Melanie Mayor Special Assistant, ELEM Rm 3014, (240) 402-1967, Angelicia Hughes, Quality System Manager, Suite 510 (CHI-DO), (312) 596-6452, FAX (312) 886-1682 Lauren Lutsky, Program Training Officer (a), WO31 Rm 3531B, (301) 796-0315 Division of Domestic Human and Animal Food Operations Eric S.
    [Show full text]
  • Hudson Yards Project Has Exceeded Initial Estimates
    New York City Independent Budget Office Fiscal Brief April 2013 Financing Redevlopment on the Far West Side: City’s Spending on Hudson Yards Project Has Exceeded Initial Estimates Summary In 2005, the city launched its planned transformation of the Far West Side of Manhattan—an area that has become known as Hudson Yards—into a high-density offi ce, commercial, and residential area through rezoning, the extension of the 7 subway line, and the creation of a new park-lined boulevard. To fund the infrastructure upgrades, the plan called for value capture fi nancing, a strategy that uses the expected taxes and fees from new developments in the area to back the bonds issued to pay for the infrastructure improvements. Recognizing that in the early years of the project revenues would not be suffi cient to make interest payments on the bonds issued to fund the redevelopment, the city committed to make up the difference. The Bloomberg Administration is now proposing a major rezoning of East Midtown. Concerned that this new initiative would compete with Hudson Yards and slow the revenue growth needed to make Hudson Yards self-supporting, Council Member Daniel Garodnick asked IBO to review city spending to date on the plan and to consider the short-term outlook for revenues at Hudson Yards. Among our fi ndings: • Public expenditures paid to the Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corporation, including funds to help make interest payments on the $3 billion in bonds issued by the corporation, have totaled $374 million since 2006. • Over the same period, the city has committed an additional $22 million from its capital budget and $12 million from its operating budget to the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Manhattan New Development Report
    JUNE 2016 Manhattan New Development Report MANHATTAN NEW DEVELOPMENT REPORT June 2016 New Buildings by Neighborhood Condominium development has largely centered on Midtown over the past several years, but there will be a wave of new construction and conversions in the Financial District in the near future, with large buildings such as 50 West Street, One Seaport and 125 Greenwich Street contributing to the roughly 1,250 new apartments slated for the neighborhood. NEW DEVELOPMENT KEY: UNITS: 10+ 50+ 100+ 150+ 200+ Unit Count NEIGHBORHOOD # OF UNITS NEIGHBORHOOD # OF UNITS Financial District 1,251 Broadway Corridor 264 Midtown West 1,229 Murray Hill 249 Lower East Side 912 East Village 207 Riverside Dr./West End Ave. 881 Chelsea 201 Flatiron/Union Square 499 SOHO 165 Gramercy Park 494 Central Park West 160 Tribeca 493 West Village 125 Midtown East 345 Beekman/Sutton Place 113 Yorkville 282 Carnegie Hill 105 2 June 2016 MANHATTAN NEW DEVELOPMENT REPORT Summary Condominium development is a multi-billion dollar business in Manhattan, and new apartment sales are poised to reach a level not seen since last decade’s boom cycle by 2018. While fewer developers in 2016 are signing on to build sky-grazing towers with penthouses that cost $100 million or more, condominium prices are still on an upward trajectory, with anticipated sales totaling roughly $30 billion through 2019. In total, 92 condominium projects with roughly 8,000 new apartments are under construction or proposed. Total New Development Sales (in Billions) $14B $12B $10.3B New development sales $10B totaled $5.4 billion last year, $8.4B up significantly from the $4.1 $8B billion in sales recorded in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Manhattan Real Estate Market Review Q1 2019
    COMMERCIAL OFFICE RETAIL TOURISM & HOSPITALITY RESIDENTIAL MAJOR PROJECTS UPDATE ALLIANCE FOR DOWNTOWN NEW YORK LOWER MANHATTAN REAL ESTATE MARKET REVIEW Q1 2019 Private-Sector Employment Exceeds Levels Not Seen Since September 2001 Lower Manhattan Year to Date Leasing Activity, Almost eighteen years after September 11, 2001, private-sector 2015 - 2018 employment in Lower Manhattan has rebounded past immediate Source: CBRE pre-9/11 levels, fulfilling the promise to rebuild the neighborhood and reanimate its role as a vibrant and essential commercial district for the city, the state and the nation. According to the latest data from the New York State Department of Labor, Lower Manhattan has reached its highest level of private-sector employment since before September 11th. Strong leasing across industry sectors and in a diverse set of buildings helped push private-sector employment to 251,334, a figure not seen since the third quarter of 2001. Relocations, particularly from Midtown South, continue to drive leasing in Lower Manhattan. Two million square feet of deals helped Lower Manhattan outperform Manhattan’s other submarkets during one of the busiest quarters in seven years. The district’s retail and hospitality markets continued to thrive with new restaurants and hotels opening. Vigorous First Quarter Leasing Activity Two million square feet of new deals were inked in the first quarter. Leasing represented the second highest quarterly total in more than seven years and was 52% above the five-year quarterly average. The strong leasing trend continues the momentum from the end of 2018 when 2.1 million square feet were leased. Lower Manhattan was the only submarket in New York City to register an increase in leasing activity above the five-year quarterly average.
    [Show full text]
  • First Amendment Restated Condominium Offering Plan
    FIRST AMENDMENT RESTATED CONDOMINIUM OFFERING PLAN 125 GREENWICH CONDOMINIUM 125 GREENWICH STREET NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10006 273 Residential Units (including 1 Resident Manager's Unit): ..•......... $872,989,200.00 20 Storage Lockers ...•..................•..•..........•........•..........•..•.....••••..••.....•.....•..$2,850,750.00 Total Offering Amount ...•....•....................•..........•..•..•...•.•..•.....•..•..•........$875,839,950.00 The Condominium will also include the Non-Residential Unit which is not being offered for sale at this time. SPONSOR: SALES CENTER: SELLING AGENT: VS 125LLC One World Trade Center Douglas Elliman, LLC c/o Bizzi & Partners Development New York, New York 10048 575 Madison Avenue LLC, 55 East 59th Street (212) 257-6600 New York, New York 10022 New York, New York 10022 (212) 891-7000 Filing Date of this Restated Offering Plan: ______ 201 . This Restated Offering Plan may not be used after _____ _, 201_, unless this Restated Offering Plan is extended by amendment. This Restated Offering Plan contains Special Risks to Purchasers. See Page 1. BECAUSE SPONSOR IS RETAINING THE UNCONDIDONAL RIGHT TO RENT RATHER THAN SELL RESIDENTIAL UNITS, AFTER PLAN CONSUMMATION, THIS RESTATED OFFERING PLAN MAY NOT RESULT IN THE CREATION OF A CONDOMINIUM IN WHICH A MAJORITY OF THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS ARE OWNED BY OWNER-OCCUPANTS OR INVESTORS UNRELATED TO SPONSOR. (SEE THE SECTION OF THIS OFFERING PLAN ENTITLED "SPECIAL RISKS") PURCHASERS FOR THEIR OWN OCCUPANCY MAY NEVER GAIN CONTROL OF THE CONDOMINIUM BOARD UNDER THE TERMS OF THIS OFFERING PLAN. THIS RESTATED OFFERING PLAN IS SPONSOR'S ENTIRE OFFER TO SELL THESE CONDOMINIUM UNITS. NEW YORK LAW REQUIRES SPONSOR TO DISCLOSE ALL MATERIAL INFORMATION IN THIS OFFERING PLAN AND TO FILE THIS RESTATED OFFERING PLAN WITH THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF LAW PRIOR TO SELLING OR OFFERING TO SELL ANY CONDOMINIUM UNIT.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Economy of Value Capture: How the Financialization of Hudson Yards Created a Private Rail Line for the Rich
    The Political Economy of Value Capture: How the Financialization of Hudson Yards Created a Private Rail Line for the Rich Danielle L. Petretta Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy under the Executive Committee Of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2020 © 2020 Danielle L. Petretta All Rights Reserved The Political Economy of Value Capture: How the Financialization of Hudson Yards Created a Private Rail Line for the Rich Abstract: The theory of value capture is simple to understand and easy to sell, promising self-fulfilling virtuous cycles of value generation, capture, and redistribution. Countless studies document value creation attributable to public interventions, providing guidance on the type and extent of potential benefits. Scholars too have set forth parameters for optimal value capture conditions and caution against common pitfalls to keep in mind when designing value capture plans. But even when utilizing the best advice, equitable redistribution of benefits rarely occurs in neoliberal economies, leaving municipalities struggling to meet the myriad of social needs and provide basic services for all their inhabitants. Invariably, capitalistic real estate states seek to financialize public assets for private gain. Nowhere is this more apparent in New York City today than in the outcomes thus far of one of the largest public-private developments in New York history at Hudson Yards. This dissertation documents the failure of the value capture scheme put in place at Hudson Yards which neither captured fair market value for the public, nor extracted much public benefit. The scheme aimed to leverage vast tracts of publicly-owned land above operational rail yards at the Far West Side of Manhattan.
    [Show full text]
  • In Sight but out of Mind: the Construction of Memory at Three Once Stigmatized Sites in Berlin and Poznań
    IN SIGHT BUT OUT OF MIND: THE CONSTRUCTION OF MEMORY AT THREE ONCE STIGMATIZED SITES IN BERLIN AND POZNAŃ By Stephen Paul Naumann A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy German Studies 2012 ABSTRACT IN SIGHT BUT OUT OF MIND: THE CONSTRUCTION OF MEMORY AT THREE ONCE STIGMATIZED SITES IN BERLIN AND POZNAŃ By Stephen Paul Naumann This study explores cultural identity reflected in the urban landscape at three structures formerly identified with National Socialism: Berlin’s Olympiastadion (Olympic Stadium) and Siegessäule (Victory Column), and Poznań’s Zamek cesarski (formerly Kaiserschloss – or Imperial Castle). My analysis is based on local and state archival work, as well as the examination of literary, visual and media sources in both Germany and Poland. I conclude that after the structures were first used to project meaning from Cold War tropes, both tourism and the enhancement of local identity in the face of European and global influences eventually contributed to the shift in meaning at these spaces in both cities. Poznań’s Zamek cesarski, a palace first commissioned by German Kaiser Wilhelm II, became, with its dedication in 1910, a monument to Prussian-German imperialism in this multi- ethnic Polish-German-Jewish city. Rededicated by the new Polish republic after World War I, the structure was later remodeled by the Nazis for Hitler’s use. One of their most prominent additions is still visible today: the Führerbalkon, a balcony extending off the front of the building for Hitler to watch military parades.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Greenwich Street Development District
    SPECIAL GREENWICH STREET DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT SPECIAL GREENWICH STREET DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT by CAROL SHEN GLASS A.B., UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY (1969) SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF ARCHITECTURE at the MASSACHUSE TTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June, 1 School of Architecture and Planning, May 19, 1971 Certified By The is Advisor A pteg By A Chairman, Dep rtmentalCommittee on Graduate Students Rotch (Ds. 1I9T DEC 15 1971 4-16R ARI ES - -i- ABSTRACT Special Greenwich Street Development District Carol Shen Glass Submitted to the School of Architecture and Planning on May 19, 1971, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Architecture. The Special Greenwich Street Development District is an ordinance recently added to the New York City Zoning Resolution. The special district provides a 24-block area in downtown Lower Manhattan with a "District Plan" of services and circulation elements that must be constructed as development occurs. The special district legislation is intended to both encourage development and to coordinate and direct it towards providing certain public improvements deemed necessary. A case study examination of the effects of the new zoning laws reveals the implications of the concepts of the district with regard to: (1) Design: the physical, formal response to legal require- ments and the effects of those requirements on the design process. (2) Pedestrian System: in the immediate area of the case study, the effects of the "District Plan" upon contiguous pedestrian access patterns. (3) Working Environment: within the case study developments, the impact of the "District Plan" upon the quality of the environment for the working population.
    [Show full text]
  • In One Important Way, Condominiums Had a Banner Year in 2017. Though
    In one important way, condominiums had a banner year in 2017. Though closings were about par for the course and contract volume was nothing to write home about, a single Manhattan building finally crossed the $4 billion threshold. Thanks to a familiar face, 2017 gave us the most expensive condo building in Manhattan history, when Gary Barnett’s Central Park Tower was approved to hit the market at $4 billion. The eye-popping total exceeded its limestone rival at 220 Central Park South by about $600 million. Despite a sagging luxury market, Barnett and a handful of other developers are shooting for ambitious sellouts. Appearing on this list are Bizzi & Partners’ long-delayed supertall at 125 Greenwich Street, the Elad Group and Peebles Corporation’s drama- soaked Clock Tower conversion in Tribeca, and HFZ Capital’s conversion of the historic Belnord on the Upper West Side. After Central Park Tower, the prices drop off quickly. HFZ’s Belnord conversion was the only other condo project with a targeted price tag above $1 billion in 2017, with a projected sellout of $1.35 billion. Following that, a trio of waterfront condo towers at GID Development’s Waterline Square have a combined sellout of $1.15 billion, and two of the condo towers made the list independently. Here is the full list of the most valuable condo offering plans accepted by the New York State Attorney General’s office in 2017. 1. Central Park Tower Developer: Extell Development Sellout: $4,016,410,000 Units: 179 Type: New Construction Neighborhood: Midtown Extell’s Central Park Tower will blow past a slew of city records if it reaches its projected sellout of $4 billion for 179 apartments.
    [Show full text]
  • New York Placenames in Film Titles
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research Kingsborough Community College 2007 New York Placenames in Film Titles Jay H. Bernstein CUNY Kingsborough Community College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/kb_pubs/10 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] New York Place Names in Film Titles Jay H. Bernstein Robert J. Kibbee Library Kingsborough Community College – CUNY 2001 Oriental Blvd. Brooklyn, NY 11235 Tel.: (718) 368-6548 Fax: (718) 368-5481 2 New York Place Names in Film Titles Abstract From 1914 to 2006, 396 feature films with titles containing New York place names were released. This pattern emerged during the silent era, peaked from the late 1920s to the early 1940s, and then dropped off steadily before rebounding in the 1970s. This article discusses the cinematic representation of cities and urban life in the movies and the special place of New York as an “imagined city” and a cultural icon. New York’s associations in the popular imagination help explain the frequent occurrence of themes of negativity, violence, nightlife, and grandiosity (royalty or divinity) in these titles. The use of New York place names in titles creates guideposts in a socio-cognitive map of the city. 3 The titles of theatrical films reveal certain patterns. Recent years have brought us New York Minute (2004), Brooklyn Bound (2004), Union Square (2004), Autumn in New York (2000), Maid in Manhattan (2002), Love at Times Square (2003), and many others containing New York place names.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Rooted Modernism' to the Third Reich's Architectural Ne
    fascism 7 (2018) 9-44 brill.com/fasc Building the Visible Immortality of the Nation: The Centrality of ‘Rooted Modernism’ to the Third Reich’s Architectural New Order Roger Griffin Oxford Brookes University [email protected] Abstract This article sets out to contribute conceptual clarity to the growing recognition of the modern and futural dynamic behind fascist cultural projects by focusing on projects for architectural renewal under the Third Reich. It starts by reviewing the gradual recognition of the futural temporality of the regime’s culture. It then introduces the concept ‘rooted modernism’ and argues for its application not only to the vernacu- lar idioms of some of the Reich’s new buildings, but also to the International Style and machine aesthetic deployed in many Nazi technological and industrial buildings. The article’s main focus is on the extensive use made in the new civic and public architecture under Nazism (and Fascism) of ‘stripped classicism’. This was a form of neo-classicism widely encountered in both democratic and authoritarian states throughout the inter-war period, and which can be understood as an alternative strand of architectural modernism co-existing with more overtly avant-garde experi- ments in reshaping the built environment. The case is then made for applying a new conceptual framework for evaluating the relationship to modernity and modernism of architectural projects, not just in fascist cultural production, but that of the many authoritarian right-wing regimes of the period which claimed to embrace the national past while striving for a dynamic, heroic future. This opens up the possibility for his- torians to engage with the complex cultural entanglements and histoires croisées of revolutionary with modernizing conservative states in the ‘fascist era’.
    [Show full text]