DOCSLIB.ORG

NWL Action Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NWL Action Plan North Carolina Climate Risk Assessment and Resilience Plan Impacts, Vulnerability, Risks, and Preliminary Actions Appendix B: North Carolina Natural and Working Lands Action Plan June 2020 Page Left Intentionally Blank North Carolina Natural and Working Lands Action Plan Turnball Creek Educational State Forest in Bladen County. (Photo courtesy of North Carolina Forest Service) June 2020 Purpose of the North Carolina Natural and Working Lands Action Plan The purpose of the North Carolina Natural and Working Lands Action Plan (referred to as the NWL Action Plan) is to identify and create opportunities and outline specific projects for North Carolina’s natural and working lands (NWL) that sequester carbon, build ecosystem and community resilience, provide ecosystem benefits, and enhance our economy. This action plan can be used by 1) public and private landowners and managers; 2) impact partners such as universities, nonprofit organizations, corporations, land-use consultants and investors; and 3) federal, state and local planners, and policymakers to facilitate meeting North Carolina’s goals identified under the plan. Specifically, the NWL Action Plan addresses the following issues: • Define the stakeholders’ shared goals developed for the NWL Action Plan; • Present the current state of our NWL; • Quantify the potential impact of various actions; • Recommend specific actions that facilitate meeting the shared goals; • Identify implementation pathways, partners, and funding to facilitate taking action; • Discuss roadblocks currently preventing the use of certain action pathways; and • Encourage working on broad policy initiatives that would greatly enhance meeting our goals. The writers of this document recognize that working to improve NWL requires a great deal of time, planning, organizing, collaborating, and funding. This plan seeks to identify and prioritize short-term, cost-effective, and pragmatic solutions, as well as identifying longer-term actions that require more effort and funding, including potential legislative or programmatic changes. The writers also see this plan as a “living document” with periodic updates and progress reports. Acknowledgments We are thankful to all the stakeholders, subcommittee members, and partner organizations who gave their time and effort freely to work on this plan. Without their support and guidance, the recommendations would not have taken shape. We specifically thank Rick Savage of the Carolina Wetlands Association for working on all the subcommittees, providing much-needed cohesion for the plan, and assisting on writing and editing the document. In addition, we thank the Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions - Ecosystem Services Program for developing much of the data used in the plan and the Storymaps. We also thank the US Climate Alliance and its partners for peer-reviewing the draft plan. i North Carolina Natural and Working Lands Action Plan June 2020 Table of Contents 1.0 Overview of the NWL Action Plan Process .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Directives Calling for the NWL Action Plan ......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Overview of Stakeholder Process .......................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Stakeholder Shared Goals for Natural and Working Lands ................................................................... 3 1.4 List of Participants ................................................................................................................................. 4 2.0 Natural and Working Land Basics ......................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Data on Land Use Types ........................................................................................................................ 7 2.2 New Ideas: Blue Carbon ...................................................................................................................... 10 2.3 Economic and Social Value of NWL ................................................................................................... 11 2.3.1 Value of the Land and the Ecosystem Services ..................................................................................... 11 2.3.3 Value of Resilience ............................................................................................................................... 13 2.4 North Carolina Greenhouse Gas Inventory .......................................................................................... 14 3.0 Stakeholder Recommendations ............................................................................................................ 16 3.1 Transformative Recommendations ...................................................................................................... 18 3.1.1 Protect and Restore Forests and Wetlands in Flood Prone Areas ....................................................... 18 3.1.2 Facilitate Voluntary Landowner Participation in Carbon Offset and Ecosystem Services Markets ... 21 3.1.3 Build a Natural and Working Lands Solutions Toolbox ....................................................................... 23 3.1.4 Integrate Climate Adaptation and Resiliency Strategies into Local Comprehensive Plans ................. 26 3.2 Priority Recommendations Key ........................................................................................................... 28 3.3 Priority Recommendations for Forest Lands ....................................................................................... 29 4.3.1 Protect Forest Lands ............................................................................................................................ 30 3.3.2 Restore Forest Land ............................................................................................................................ 33 3.3.3 Enhance Forest Land ........................................................................................................................... 36 3.4 Priority Recommendations for Floodplains and Wetlands .................................................................. 39 3.4.1 Protect and Restore Floodplains .......................................................................................................... 40 3.5 Priority Recommendations for Pocosins .............................................................................................. 45 3.5.1 Restore Pocosins .................................................................................................................................. 46 3.5.2 Enhance Pocosins ................................................................................................................................. 54 3.6 Priority Recommendations for Coastal Habitats .................................................................................. 61 3.6.1 Protect Coastal Habitats ...................................................................................................................... 62 3.6.2 Restore Coastal Habitats ...................................................................................................................... 68 3.7 Priority Recommendations for Urban Lands ....................................................................................... 72 3.7.1 Protect Urban Lands ............................................................................................................................ 73 3.7.2 Enhance Urban Lands .......................................................................................................................... 77 3.8 Priority Recommendations for Agriculture .......................................................................................... 81 3.8.1 Recommendations to Enhance Agriculture .......................................................................................... 82 ii North Carolina Natural and Working Lands Action Plan June 2020 4.0 Existing North Carolina NWL Plans and Resources ........................................................................... 97 5.0 Acronym List ....................................................................................................................................... 99 6.0 Glossary ............................................................................................................................................. 101 APPENDIX I: Methods for Quantitative Estimates of Natural And Working Lands Potential List of Tables Table 1-1: Stakeholders’ Shared Goals for the NWL Action Plan .................................................................... 3 Table 1-2: Limitations on Recommendations .................................................................................................... 4 Table 1-3: Subcommittee Members ................................................................................................................... 4 Table 2-1: North Carolina Land Uses Changes 2001-2016 (million acres) ....................................................... 8 Table 2-2: Miles of Coastline and Rivers in North Carolina ............................................................................. 9 Table 2-3: GHG Emissions & Sinks from Land Use/Land Use Changes/Forestry (MMT CO2e) .................. 15 Table 3-1: Summary Table of Priority Recommendations .............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tourism Asset Inventory
    Asset Asset Management Overview Natural/Scenic Asset Details Cultural/Historic Asset Details Event Asset Details Type: Brief Description Potential Market Draw: Access: Uses: Ownership Supporting Critical Asset is Key Tourism Opportunities are Land Visitor Use Management Interpretation Ranger at Site Visitor Potential Land Protection Species Represents the Type of Cultural Representation has Promotion of event Attendance of Event Event results Event has a NGOs Management marketed through Impact Indicators provided to businesses, Management Policy or Plan Plans Included at Site Facilities at Hazards Status Protection cultural heritage of the Heritage Represented: the support of a is primarily: event is Duration: in increased specific Natural, Cultural, Day Visit, Overnight, 1 = difficult Hiking, Biking, Issues Destination are Being visitors, and community Plan in Place Stakeholder Site Status region diverse group of primarily: overnight marketing Historic, Scenic, Extended 5 = easy Paddling, Marketing Monitored on a members to donate Input Tangible, Intangible, stakeholders Locally, Regionally, One Day, stays in strategy and Event, Educational, Interpretation, Organization / Regular Basis time, money, and/or Both Nationally, Locally, Multiple Days destination economic Informational etc. TDA and Reported to other resources for Internationally, All Regionally, impact TDA asset protection Nationally, indicators Internationally, All Pisgah National Forest Natural Established in 1916 and one of the first national Day Visit, Overnight, 5; PNF in Hiking, Biking, U.S. Federal Pisgah Overcrowding Yes Yes, in multiple ways Nantahalla and y,n - name, year Yes; National At various placs at various At various Any hazard Federally protected See Forest forests in the eastern U.S., Pisgah stretches across Extended Transylvania Rock Climbing, Government Conservancy, at some popular through multiple Pisgah forest Forest listed below locations below locations below associated with public lands for Management several western North Carolina counties.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Funded Projects
    CWMTF Awards - updated May 17, 2019 Table 1 - Summary of Funded Projects Acquisition (Military Buffer) $3,714,191 Acquisition (Non-military) $16,059,866 Restoration $4,841,500 Innovative Stormwater $390,723 Planning $414,264 Donated Minigrants* $120,250 Total $25,540,794 Note: "Provisional Awards" are made pending additional revenue that may come before June 30, 2019. indicates project has been fully funded with additional revenue since November 15, 2018 * Up to $294,000 will be allocated for Donated Minigrants from revenue as applications are approved ** Indicates project to be funded only through funds returned from project underruns ***Indicates project to be funded only if another 2018 innovative stormwater project does not accept award Provisional App. Number Project Name Award Award County ACQUISITION PROJECTS 2018-072 The Nature Conservancy - Harrison Tract, $375,056 Washington Roanoke River (military) 2018-045 North Carolina Coastal Land Trust - Salters Creek $1,200,000 Carteret Landing (military) 2018-061 The Conservation Fund - Deep River $840,000 Chatham 2018-010 Conserving Carolina - DuPont Connector, Green $858,900 Henderson River Headwaters 2018-023 Foothills Conservancy of North Carolina - Bobs $1,200,000 McDowell Creek Wilderness Phase 2 2018-039 Mainspring Conservation Trust - Simp Gap, $604,831 Graham Cheoah Bald 2018-075 Tar River Land Conservancy - Hunter Tract, $137,908 Granville Dickens Creek (military) 2018-016 Conservation Trust for North Carolina - Florence $150,977 Watauga Boyd Tract, Boone Fork 2018-069 The
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2018 Newsletter: Treatment
    HEMLOCK RESTORATION INITIATIVE NEWSLETTER WINTER 2018—ISSUE 2 2018 was filled with volunteers, hikes, chemical treatment, educational presentations, and exciting beetle discoveries. We are grateful for the continued support of the NCDA&CS and USDA-FS Forest Health Protection. Thanks to allocations from the State of North Carolina, HRI has been granted funding through 2020 to continue the im- portant work of restoring our native hemlock forests across the state. We hope you enjoy reading about what we were up to this past year. Chemical treatment season off to a strong start IN THIS ISSUE The HRI team began our palachians. We were able to increase Chemical treatment update 1 chemical treatment season this fall the number of these massive, majestic with a fun trip on the river. We returned trees receiving chemical protection, New faces at HRI 2 to New River State Park in Ashe some of which are as large as five feet County to treat more of the park’s in diameter. Providing chemical treat- HWA treatment workshops 2 hemlocks. Eastern hemlocks in ripar- ment in this old-growth stand as part of Biocontrol update ian areas are crucial to the health of an integrated pest management strat- 2 the New River, a federally designated egy will help the hefty hemlocks’ per- HWA managers’ meeting 3 Wild and Scenic River. To access sist over the next several years, and some of these riverside hemlocks, we we were glad to be a part of it. Pisgah educational kiosk 3 canoed across the waterway on a In our treatment season this beautiful, sunny morning in October.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Resources and Water Safety
    CHAPTER 10 - WILDLIFE RESOURCES AND WATER SAFETY This Chapter 10 of Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code (15A NCAC 10); WILDLIFE RESOURCES AND WATER SAFETY; has been transferred and recodified from Chapter 10 of Title 15 of the North Carolina Administrative Code (15 NCAC 10), effective November 1, 1989. The recodification was pursuant to G.S. 143B-279.1. SUBCHAPTER 10A - WILDLIFE RESOURCES COMMISSION SECTION .0100 - GENERAL 15A NCAC 10A .0101 RESPONSIBILITIES 15A NCAC 10A .0102 FUNCTIONS 15A NCAC 10A .0103 FISCAL POLICY 15A NCAC 10A .0104 REIMBURSEMENT OF WILDLIFE FUND 15A NCAC 10A .0105 STEWARDSHIP OF REVENUES 15A NCAC 10A .0106 MOTTO History Note: Authority G.S. 75A-3; 113-306; 113-307.1; 143-239; 143-243; 143-250; 143-254.1; 143A-118; 143B-281; Eff. February 1, 1976; Repealed Eff. February 1, 1982. SECTION .0200 - ORGANIZATION AND PROCEDURE 15A NCAC 10A .0201 ACTION BY COMMISSION History Note: Authority G.S. 143-243; Eff. February 1, 1976; Repealed Eff. July 1, 1988. 15A NCAC 10A .0202 OFFICERS OF COMMISSION 15A NCAC 10A .0203 MEETINGS OF COMMISSION History Note: Authority G.S. 143-243; Eff. February 1, 1976; Amended Eff. April 15, 1979; Repealed Eff. February 1, 1982. 15A NCAC 10A .0204 COMMITTEES History Note: Authority G.S. 75A-3(b); 143-243; Eff. February 1, 1976; Amended Eff. April 15, 1979; Repealed Eff. July 1, 1988. 15A NCAC 10A .0205 SEAL OF COMMISSION 15A NCAC 10A .0206 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 15A NCAC 10A .0207 ASSISTANT FOR ADMINISTRATION 15A NCAC 10A .0208 ASSISTANT FOR FIELD OPERATIONS History Note: Authority G.S.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina Keywords/Characteristics (Eg
    The Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) is America’s premier federal program that reinvests offshore energy revenue into conservation to ensure that we all have access to the outdoors. Whether it is a local community park or playground, or the vast expanses of our federal public lands, Congress created the LWCF over a half-century ago to guarantee America’s natural, historical and outdoor recreation heritage. TELL YOUR ELECTED OFFICIALS ABOUT YOUR CONNECTION TO THESE LWCF PLACES NEAR YOU. Project overviews courtesy of the LWCF Coalition. lwcfcoalition.com Project Name/Unit: Catawba Falls, Pisgah National Forest (U.S. Forest Service) LWCF Contribution: $16 million in Pisgah NF overall Stakeholders Involved: Foothills Conservancy Keywords/Characteristics (eg. rec access, drinking water, consolidating maintenance): Recreation access, consolidating maintenance Short Description: Inaccessible to the public for decades, Catawba Falls is now one of the region’s most popular attractions. In 2010 the US Forest Hikers enjoying Catawba Falls Service purchased the access area to the falls from Foothills Conservancy who Credit: Southern Appalachian had prioritized opening a gateway to the stunning site for years. By enabling Highlands Conservancy the acquisition of a parking area and entrance to the trail network, funds from LWCF kick-started an economic revival in an area of NC hard hit by the decline in manufacturing. Improved access has also reduced the cost of management for the local EMS by providing safe ingress and egress to a site that once was reachable only by helicopter. Project Name/Unit: North Mills River, Pisgah National Forest (U.S. Forest Service) LWCF Contribution: $16 million in Pisgah NF overall Stakeholders Involved: Conserving Carolina (formerly Carolina Mountains Land Conservancy) led Keywords/Characteristics (eg.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina Inland Fishing, Hunting & Trapping REGULATIONS DIGEST
    North Carolina Inland Fishing, Hunting & Trapping REGULATIONS DIGEST 2021–2022 Effective Aug. 1, 2021 to July 31, 2022 Online at ncwildlife.org Hunt with the Big Dogs On the Currituck Outer Banks, NC The Land of the Wild Goose Currituck is an Algonquin Indian word that means “the land of the wild goose,” and many outdoorsmen have discovered it’s not a fairy tale but rather the stuff of legend. Miles of unspoiled natural habitat, waters, marshes, and woods Corolla • Carova • The Mainland await you where the big dogs hunt, Currituck, NC. Call 877.287.7488 for information or your visitor’s guide Find your guide at VisitCurrituck.com North Carolina Inland Fishing, Hunting & Trapping Contents REGULATIONS DIGEST What’s New This Season �����������������������6 Trapping Regulations and Information ..................................... 52 2021–2022 License Information ................................8 General Information ........................... 8 Hunting Regulations License Requirements and Information .....................................54 State of North Carolina and Exceptions ..................................... 8 Manner of Taking �������������������������������54 Governor Roy Cooper, License Type Descriptions ��������������12 Hunting on Federal Lands ���������������58 Big Game Harvest Reporting ���������59 North Carolina Wildlife License Type Charts ��������������������������20 Bear Seasons and Maps �������������������60 Resources Commission Disabled Sportsman Deer Seasons and Maps ������������������62 Program Information ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F: Partners, Related Efforts & Other Resources
    Appendix F Partners, Related Efforts and Other Resources As Planning Board members developed goals, objectives and action steps, they requested that specific names of groups or organizations be left out, if possible. Their concern was that some groups or organizations might unintentionally be left out or that, over the next ten years, some organizations might change in name and/or function. Finally, Planning Board members also recognize that the County Commissioners and staff may, over time, decide to work with different partners. Below is a list and description of potential partners and other resources that were identified during the development of the 2025 Comprehensive Plan. Many of these organizations were actively involved in the development of the Plan and contributed suggestions and comments that greatly improved the Plan and its action steps. Focus Area 1-Economic Health Partners, Related Efforts and Other Resources: Local Resources: Blue Ridge Community College – offers occupational training programs in many different tracts to appeal to a diverse student body and diverse employer base. Blue Ridge Food Ventures – a food processing facility with space for processing and storage that also supports food or natural product entrepreneurs navigate the regulations related to production, financial management and marketing. Brevard SCORE - a national organization of volunteers with extensive business experience that counsel small businesses both in start-up and growth. Brevard/Transylvania Chamber of Commerce - serves as a community
    [Show full text]
  • Transylvania Treasures Trivia Quiz
    Transylvania Treasures Trivia Quiz QUESTIONS We hope you have fun researching the answers and learning more about this wonderful area. 1. The Red House (now the Red House Inn) on Probart Street is considered the first house in Brevard. It was built in 1851, years before Transylvania became a county. It has served many functions over the years. Which of the following was NOT one of those functions? a. School d. Pool hall b. General store/trading post e. County courthouse c. Railroad station 2. What year and from what two counties was Transylvania County formed? a. 1861, Haywood and Henderson counties. b. 1866, Jackson and Buncombe counties c. 1861, Jackson and Henderson counties d. 1866, Haywood and Buncombe counties e. 1861, Jackson and Haywood counties 3. Naming the Town of Rosman has quite a history. Early on it was called Jeptha by the first European settlers. Then, the town was known as Toxaway. Later, the name was changed to Eastatoe to avoid confusion with the Lake Toxaway community. In 1905, industrialist Joseph Silversteen suggested the name Rosman, which was the combination of two names. From whence did the two names come? a. Two business partners of Silversteen b. Silversteen’s children c. Silversteen’s two dogs d. Mrs. Silversteen’s two brothers 4. Several churches in the area were founded by visitors from other areas, such as the lowcountry of South Carolina. One of these churches burned to the ground on Christmas Eve 1925. The new church was enlarged and built over the original church’s graveyard. Name that church.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Top 100 Good Practice Story
    2020 TOP 100 GOOD PRACTICE STORY Title of the Story: Waterfall Safety Destination Name: (include any state, province or region) Explore Brevard, Transylvania County, NC Country: United States Submitter name: Brad Campbell Email address: [email protected] Position: Volunteer, Transylvania Always Committee Nomination Category: (Please check the boxes that indicate the focus of your story) ☐ Culture & Communities ☐ Environment & Climate ☐ Nature & Ecotourism ☐ Islands & Seaside ☐ Immediate responses in dealing with the COVID -19 ☐ Post COVID -19 recovery ☒ One of the 17 SDGs* (if yes, which one) GOAL 3: Good Health and Well-being *The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), also known as the Global Goals, were adopted by all United Nations Member States in 2015 as a universal call to action to end poverty, protect the planet and ensure that all people enjoy peace and prosperity by 2030. The 17 SDGs are integrated—that is, they recognize that action in one area will affect outcomes in others, and that development must balance social, economic and environmental sustainability. What are the Sustainable Development Goals? https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals.html For further information on Tourism for SDGs: http://tourism4sdgs.org/ Find detailed instructions for submitting good practices here DESCRIBE YOUR GOOD PRACTICE STORY Address each aspect of your good practice story in the different sections being specific including relevant quantitative and qualitative information. Issues faced Thanks to its unique geology and climate, Transylvania County, North Carolina is home to the largest concentration of waterfalls in North America, some 250 in all. These waterfalls represent a key attraction for visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM 2021 BIENNIAL REPORT Compiled
    Roy Cooper Governor D. Reid Wilson Secretary, Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Walter Clark Director, Division of Land and Water Stewardship Executive Director, NC Land and Water Fund NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM 2021 BIENNIAL REPORT Compiled by Misty Buchanan, Deputy Director for Natural Heritage Division of Land and Water Stewardship Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, North Carolina www.ncnhp.org Table of Contents REPORT ON ACTIVITIES OF 2019-2020 .................................................................................................................... 2 INFORMATION SERVICES ................................................................................................................................................. 2 INVENTORY .............................................................................................................................................................................. 5 NATURAL AREA CONSERVATION ............................................................................................................................ 19 NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM STAFF ............................................................................................................... 26 MAJOR ACTIVITIES PLANNED FOR 2021-2022 ................................................................................................. 27 APPENDIX A: PUBLICATIONS AND REPORTS .................................................................................................... 28 APPENDIX B: BIENNIAL PROTECTION
    [Show full text]
  • Bicycle Level of Comfort
    Transylvania County BICYCLE PLAN Prepared for Transylvania County 2019 Prepared by Alta Planning + Design ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks to the local residents, business leaders, community leaders, and government staff who participated in the development of this study through meetings, events, volunteering, interviews, and review. Special thanks to the Blue Ridge Bicycle Club for providing the match for this planning grant, and to those stakeholders who participated as stakeholder group members, listed below. PROJECT STAFF Joy Fields, Planning & Community Development, Transylvania County STAKEHOLDER GROUP MEMBERS Travis Book, Resident Mark Burrows, Resident David Carter, Transylvania County Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) Dave Casey, US Forest Service Daniel Cobb, City of Brevard Planning & Zoning Bob Cole, Resident Gary Daniel, City of Brevard Council Wes Dickson, Sycamore Cycles John Ditillo, Resident Vicki Eastland, Land of Sky RPO Economic and Community Development Tad Fogel, Blue Ridge Bicycle Club; Friends of the Ecusta Trail Jonathan Griffin, Transylvania County Phil Harris, City of Brevard Police Department Mike Hawkins, Transylvania County Board of Commissioners Colin Izzard, CTS Train Right David Joyce, Brevard College President Alan Justice, Transylvania County Schools Sarah Knox, Resident Nick Kroncke, Land of Sky RPO Economic and Community Development Rick Lasater, Resident Robert Lawson, Resident Suzanne Lawson, Cedar Mountain Community Center Bryan Lopez, NCDOT Division of Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Clark Lovelace,
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Historic Preservation
    HISTORY INDEX--BOX CONTENTS BOX 1 BREVARD, CITY OF Bicycle/Pedestrian Pathway (8 items) Bracken Mountain Park (10 items) Brevard, Ephraim (12 items) Fire Department-News ((18 items) Fire Department-Business (12 items) Government (23 items) Historic Trail of Brevard (6 items) History 1950-1999 (9 items) History 1900-1949 (30 items) History Before 1900 (21 items) Land Use & Development (15 items) Life in a Small Town (2 items) Local Citizens (4 items) Parking Meters (8 items) Police Department (7 items) Public Works (2 items) Retirement/Tourism (18 items) Tannery Park (2 items) Water (16 items) BOX 1A ROSMAN, TOWN OF Businesses (7 items) Fire Department (2 items) Government (4 items) History (24 items) History of Town of Toxaway (6 items) Industries (11 items) Silversteen, Joseph S. (2 items) BOX 2 U.D.C. RECORDS Applicants for Membership in the Transylvania Chapter of the UDC (105 items) Applicants for Membership in the Transylvania Volunteers Chapter of the Children of the Confederacy (60 items) Book “Reunion of United Confederate Veterans (1 item) Chapter Histories (3 items) CSA Veterans—Certificate of Eligibility of Cross of Honor (91 items) Demits (Releases) to Transylvania Chapter of the UDC (7 items) Incomplete Applications for Membership in the Transylvania Chapter of the UDC (49 items) Ledgers—List of Members and Dues, 1926-1950 (1 item) Membership & Minutes (4 items) BOX 2A U.D.C. RECORDS—continued Minutes Book—October 1934-October 1935 (1 bound item) Prize Essays—1929-1930 Children of the Confederacy (1 bound item) Prize Essays—1931
    [Show full text]