Some Mathematicians

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Some Mathematicians JL 1 Ulisse Dini, 1845-1918 Pisa, Italy Dini’s theorem (not in book) Let (fn : R ! R)n2N a sequence of continuous functions pointwisely converging to a continuous function and such that 8n 2 N; 8x 2 [a; b]; fn+1(x) ≥ fn(x). Then (fn : R ! R)n2N converges uniformly. One interesting fact about this mathematician: Beside being a mathematician, Dini reached the highest office in university administration when he became rector of the University of Pisa, he was elected to the national Italian parliament in 1880 as a representative from Pisa. He was the chair of “infinitesimal analysis”. Another interesting fact about this mathematician: The implicit function theorem is known in Italy as the Dini’s theorem. How many stars you give to your mathematicians: ERIC COOKE 2 Thomas Joannes Stieltjes, 1865- 1894 The Netherlands Definition of the Riemann-Stieltjes sum (35.24, p.320) Let f be bounded on [a; b], and let P = fa = t0 < t1 < : : : < tn = bg ; a partition of [a; b].A Riemann-Stieltjes sum of f associated with P and F is a sum of the form n n X + − X − + f (tk ) F(tk ) − F(tk ) + f (xk ) F(tk ) − F(tk−1) : k=0 k=1 where xk is in (tk−1; tk ) for k = 1; 2;:::; n. One interesting fact about this mathematician: Stieltjes never graduated college and in fact failed out twice. It was his achievements in mathematics that earned him an honorary degree. How many stars you give to your mathematicians: I gave this mathematician four stars, mainly because he died so young and only worked in the field for less than ten years. SYD FREDERICK 3 Michel Rolle, 1652-1719 France Rolle’s Theorem (29.2, p.233) Let f be a continuous function on [a; b] that is differentiable on (a; b) and satisfies f (a) = f (b). There exists [at least one] x in (a; b) such that f 0(x) = 0. One interesting fact about this mathematician: Educated himself in Mathematics, no formal training. How many stars you give to your mathematicians: 5 out of 5, because his theorem is very fundamental and helps to prove the Mean Value Theorem. He also was one of the first mathematicians to publish Gaussian elimination in Europe. JOHN GORDOS 4 Julius Wilhelm Richard Dedekind, 1831-1916 Germany Dedekind Cuts (§6, p.30) Dedekind Cuts are a way to define the real numbers from the rational numbers. A Dedekind cut A is a subset of Q satisfying these properties: 1. A is neither ; nor Q; 2. If r is in A, s is in Q and s < r, then s is in A; 3. A contains no largest rational. The set of all possible Dedekind cuts can be used as the definition of R. One interesting fact about this mathematician: Dedekind was the last student of Gauss. How many stars you give to your mathematicians: Building the reals like this is mindblowing to think about, more so because Dedekind acknowledged he had weaknesses in advanced mathematics after receiving his doctorate. From here, he spent two years studying to compensate. I sympathize but my weakness exists on a foundational level. KJERSTI JACOBSON 5 Georg Cantor, 1845-1918 Germany Cantor set (Example 5, p.89) In 1883, he introduced the concept of the Cantor set. The Cantor set is simply a subset of the interval [0; 1], but the set has some very interesting properties: for instance, the set is compact, uncountable, and contains no intervals. The most common modern construction of a Cantor set is the Cantor ternary set, which is built by removing the middle thirds of a line segment. One interesting fact about this mathematician: Cantor believed that Francis Bacon wrote Shakespeare’s plays. He studied intensely Elizabethan literature to try to prove his theory. In 1896-97 he published pamphlets on the subject. How many stars you give to your mathematicians: XINXIN JIANG 6 Brook Taylor, 1685-1731 England Taylor series (31.2,p.250) Let f be a function defined on some open interval containing c. If f possesses derivatives of all orders at c, then the Taylor series for f about c is 1 X f (k)(c) (x − c)k : k! k=0 One interesting fact about this mathematician: As a mathematician, he was the only Englishman after Sir Isaac Newton and Roger Cotes capable of holding his own with the Bernoullis; but a great part of the effect of his demonstrations was lost through his failure to express his ideas fully and clearly. How many stars you give to your mathematicians: I give him 4. Though it is very important for a mathematician to focus on mathematical research, a good grasp of communications skills is also vital. And unfortunately, he is not good at expressing himself despite his brilliant thinking process. SIYUAN LIN 7 Jean Gaston Darboux, 1842-1917 France Intermediate Value Theorem for Derivatives (29.8,p.236) Let f :(a; b) ! R be a differentiable function. If a < x1 < x2 < b, and if c lies between 0 0 0 f (x1) and f (x2), then there exists (at least one) x in (x1; x2) such that f (x) = c. Upper Darboux sums (p.270) Given a f : R ! R, given a partition of [a; b], P = fa = t0 < t1 < : : : < tn = bg, the upper Darboux sum U(f ; P) of f with P is the sum n ! X U(f ; P) = sup f (x) (tk − tk−1) : k=1 x2[tk−1;tk ] One interesting fact about this mathematician: In 1902, he was elected to the Royal Society; in 1916, he received the Sylvester Medal from the Society. How many stars you give to your mathematicians: His theorems seem really complicated since we learn it at the very end of this book, so I guess he must be really brilliant. And he must be a great professor, because he taught many highly reputed European mathematicians, for example, Émile Borel, Élie Cartan, Gheorghe ¸Ti¸teicaand Stanisław Zaremba. So he deserves five stars. SAMUEL LOOS 8 Georg Friedrich Bernhard Riemann, 1826-1866 German Riemann integral (p.270) Given L(f ) (resp. U(f )) the lower (resp. upper) Darboux integral of f over [a; b], we say that f is (Riemann) integrable on [a; b] provided that L(f ) = U(f ). In this case, we write Z b f = L(f ) = U(f ): a One interesting fact about this mathematician: The base of Einstein’s Theory of Relativity was set up in 1854 when Riemann gave his first lectures on the geometry of space. How many stars you give to your mathematicians: I would give Riemann 4 stars. His contribution to numerous areas in mathematics is immense. He also had a lot of influence with the development of prime numbers. CARLY MEYER 9 Karl Weierstrass, 1815-1897 German Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem (11.5, p 72) Every bounded sequence has a convergent subsequence. Weierstrass M-test (25.7, p 205) Let (gk : ! )k2 be a sequence of functions and (Mk )k2 a sequence of real numbers such that R R N P P N (1) for all x 2 R, jgk (x)j ≤ Mk and (2) MK < 1, then gK converges uniformly. Weierstrass’s Approximation Theorem (27.5, p 220) Every continuous function on a closed interval [a,b] can be uniformly approximated by polynomials on [a.b]. One interesting fact about this mathematician: Along with teaching mathematics, he taught physics, gymnastics, geography, history, German, calligraphy and botanics at the Lyceum Hosianum in Braunsberg, Poland. A second interesting fact about this mathematician: Weierstrass has a lunar crater named after him. How many stars you give to your mathematicians: I give Weierstrass 5 out of 5 stars because he played a significant role in a lot of the content that we have learned this semester. Without the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem, a lot of our proofs would fall apart. The Weierstrass M-test is also quite a strong theorem–without knowing the pointwise convergence of a sequence of functions, we still have the ability to conclude if a sequence of functions converges uniformly. SAMUEL MORTELLARO 10 Bernard Bolzano, 1781-1848 Prague, Kingdom of Bohemia Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem (11.5, p.72) Every bounded sequence has a convergent subsequence. One interesting fact about this mathematician: Because he argued adamantly that war was a human and economic waste, he was exiled to the county side and not allowed to publish in mainstream journals. For this reason, most of his works only became well known posthumously. How many stars you give to your mathematicians: Four, I would give a random moderately famous and important mathematician a three. I gave Bolzano a four because he went beyond just the field of mathematics, and applied mathematical thinking to philosophy. He developed a rigorous theory of science and became a formative influence on analytic philosophy; a philosophical movement which I think deserves credit for removing the nonsense and ambiguity from continental philosophy (please note: that is a lot of nonsense) and has survived to this day. KATHERINE PAINE 11 Augustin-Louis Cauchy, 1789-1857 France Cauchy sequence (10.8, p.62) A sequence (sn)n2N of real numbers is called a Cauchy sequence if and only if 8" > 0; 9N; 8m > N; 8n > N; jsn − smj < ": One interesting fact about this mathematician: There exist sixteen concepts and theorems named after him, more than any other mathematician. How many stars you give to your mathematicians: 5 stars because we consantly see his definition/theorems show up throughout the class. The Cauchy sequence concept has showed up for sequences, series, uniform continuity, uniform convergence.
Recommended publications
  • Biography Paper – Georg Cantor
    Mike Garkie Math 4010 – History of Math UCD Denver 4/1/08 Biography Paper – Georg Cantor Few mathematicians are house-hold names; perhaps only Newton and Euclid would qualify. But there is a second tier of mathematicians, those whose names might not be familiar, but whose discoveries are part of everyday math. Examples here are Napier with logarithms, Cauchy with limits and Georg Cantor (1845 – 1918) with sets. In fact, those who superficially familier with Georg Cantor probably have two impressions of the man: First, as a consequence of thinking about sets, Cantor developed a theory of the actual infinite. And second, that Cantor was a troubled genius, crippled by Freudian conflict and mental illness. The first impression is fundamentally true. Cantor almost single-handedly overturned the Aristotle’s concept of the potential infinite by developing the concept of transfinite numbers. And, even though Bolzano and Frege made significant contributions, “Set theory … is the creation of one person, Georg Cantor.” [4] The second impression is mostly false. Cantor certainly did suffer from mental illness later in his life, but the other emotional baggage assigned to him is mostly due his early biographers, particularly the infamous E.T. Bell in Men Of Mathematics [7]. In the racially charged atmosphere of 1930’s Europe, the sensational story mathematician who turned the idea of infinity on its head and went crazy in the process, probably make for good reading. The drama of the controversy over Cantor’s ideas only added spice. 1 Fortunately, modern scholars have corrected the errors and biases in older biographies.
    [Show full text]
  • Fabio Tonini –
    Fabio Tonini Personal Data Date of Birth May 16, 1984 Citzenship Italy Current Position Since Researcher (RTDA) at University of Florence November 2018 Positions Held October 2018 Scholarship at Scuola Normale Superiore of Pisa October 2015 Post Doc at the Freie University of Berlin - September 2018 April 2013 - Post Doc at the Humboldt University of Berlin September 2015 January 2012 Scholarship at Scuola Normale Superiore of Pisa - January 2013 January 2009 Ph.D. student at Scuola Normale Superiore of Pisa under the supervision of - January Prof. Angelo Vistoli 2012 Italian National Scientific Habilitation (ASN) May 2021 - Professore II fascia May 2030 Education May 2013 Ph.D. at Scuola Normale Superiore of Pisa December Diploma at Scuola Normale Superiore of Pisa 2008 September Master’s Degree in Pure Mathematics, University of Pisa, with honors 2008 July 2006 Bachelor’s Degree in Pure Mathematics, University of Pisa, with honors Universitá degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica ’Ulisse Dini’, Viale Morgagni, 67/a, Firenze, 50134 Italy B fabio.tonini@unifi.it • Í people.dimai.unifi.it/tonini/ PhD’s Thesis Title Stacks of ramified Galois covers defended the 2 May 2013 pdf online link Advisor Angelo Vistoli Master’s Thesis Title Rivestimenti di Gorenstein (Gorenstein covers) pdf online link Advisor Angelo Vistoli Research Interests { Algebraic Geometry { Algebraic stacks, Moduli theory { Action of algebraic groups and Galois covers { Representation theory { Algebraic fundamental groups and gerbes Memberships { GNSAGA, INdAM, Gruppo Nazionale per le Strutture Algebriche, Geomet- riche e le loro Applicazioni Teaching Experience 2020/21 Course Title: Matematica e statistica, First year at “Scienze Farmaceutiche”, University of Florence 2020/21 Course Title: Matematica con elementi di Statistica, First year at “Scienze Naturali”, University of Florence.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Outline of the Theorem of Implicit Nctions
    Divulgaciones Matem acute-a t icas Vol period 10 No period 2 open parenthesis 2002 closing parenthesis commannoindent pp periodDivulgaciones 171 endash 180 Matem $ nacutefag $ t icas Vol . 10No . 2 ( 2002 ) , pp . 171 −− 180 A .... Historical .... Outline .... of the .... Theorem .... of nnoindentImplicit ..A F-un h nctions f i l l H i s t o r i c a l n h f i l l Outline n h f i l l o f the n h f i l l Theorem n h f i l l o f Un Bosquejo Hist acute-o rico del Teorema de las Funciones Impl dotlessi-acute citas n centerlineGiovanni Mingarif I m pScarpello l i c i t nquad open parenthesis$ F−u $ giovannimingari n c t i o n s g at l ibero period it closing parenthesis Daniele Ritelli dr itelli at e c onomia period unibo period it n centerlineDipartimentofUn di Matematica BosquejoDivulgaciones per Hist Matem le Scienzea´ $ tn icasacute Economiche Vol .f 10og No$ .e 2 Sociali( rico 2002 )delcomma , pp . Teorema 171 { 180 de las Funciones Impl $ nBolognaacutefn ItalyimathgA$ c Historical i t a s g Outline of the Theorem Abstract n centerline f Giovanniof Mingari Scarpello ( giovannimingari $ @ $ l ibero . it ) g In this article a historical outline ofImplicit the implicit functionsF theory− u nctions is presented startingUn from Bosquejo the wiewpoint Hist ofo´ Descartesrico del Teorema algebraic geometry de las Funciones Impl ´{ citas n centerline f Daniele Ritelli dr itelli $@$ e c onomia . unibo . it g open parenthesisGiovanni 1 637 closing Mingari parenthesis Scarpello and Leibniz ( giovannimingari open parenthesis 1 676@ l or ibero 1 677 closing .
    [Show full text]
  • Stanisław Zaremba
    Danuta Ciesielska*, Krzysztof Ciesielski** Instytut Historii Nauki im. L. i A. Birkenmajerów, PAN Warszawa Instytut Matematyki, Wydział Matematyki i Informatyki, UJ Kraków SSW B (1–192) O DLO K KRTKIE PRZEDSTAWIENIE POLSKIEJ I KRAKOWSKIEJ MATEMATYKI DO POCZTKW XX WIEKU Znaczący rozwój matematyki na świecie datuje się na drugą połowę drugiego tysiąclecia n.e.; przez poprzedzające go półtora tysiąclecia uzyskiwane wyniki były skromne w porównaniu z tym, co uzyskano później. Jednakże do początku XX wieku Polska była z dala od europejskiej, a tym bardziej światowej czołówki. Potęgami ma- tematycznymi były Francja i Niemcy. Ważne rezultaty osiągano w Wielkiej Brytanii i we Włoszech. Sporadycznie pojawiali się słynni matematycy także w innych krajach, jednak w podręcznikach historii matematyki trudno znaleźć wśród nich Polaków. Od XIV wieku Polska miała się czym poszczycić naukowo. Akademia Krakow- ska była drugim uniwersytetem powstałym w środkowej Europie, od początku wy- kładano tu przedmioty kojarzone z matematyką. Na początku XV wieku krakowski mieszczanin Jan Stobner ufundował specjalną katedrę matematyki i astronomii; druga katedra związana z matematyką została ufundowana przez Marcina Króla z Żurawi- cy (ok.1422–ok.1460), pół wieku później. Był to jednak okres istotnie poprzedzający czasy większych osiągnięć matematycznych. Pewne osiągnięcia matematyczne miał ponad wiek później Mikołaj Kopernik (1473–1543), jego nazwisko kojarzone jest jed- nak (oczywiście słusznie) głównie z astronomią. Dopiero w XVII wieku pojawił się w Krakowie matematyk europejskiego formatu – Joannes Broscius (1585–1652; Jan Brożek, znany też jako Brzozek). Był nie tylko mate- matykiem, ale też flozofem, astronomem, teologiem, lekarzem i historykiem nauki. Ma on na swoim koncie znaczące osiągnięcia, głównie związane są z teorią liczb.
    [Show full text]
  • HOMOTECIA Nº 6-15 Junio 2017
    HOMOTECIA Nº 6 – Año 15 Martes, 1º de Junio de 2017 1 Entre las expectativas futuras que se tienen sobre un docente en formación, está el considerar como indicativo de que logrará realizarse como tal, cuando evidencia confianza en lo que hace, cuando cree en sí mismo y no deja que su tiempo transcurra sin pro pósitos y sin significado. Estos son los principios que deberán pautar el ejercicio de su magisterio si aspira tener éxito en su labor, lo cual mostrará mediante su afán por dar lo bueno dentro de sí, por hacer lo mejor posible, por comprometerse con el porvenir de quienes confiadamente pondrán en sus manos la misión de enseñarles. Pero la responsabilidad implícita en este proceso lo debería llevar a considerar seriamente algunos GIACINTO MORERA (1856 – 1907 ) aspectos. Obtener una acreditación para enseñar no es un pergamino para exhib ir con petulancia ante familiares y Nació el 18 de julio de 1856 en Novara, y murió el 8 de febrero de 1907, en Turín; amistades. En otras palabras, viviendo en el mundo educativo, es ambas localidades en Italia. asumir que se produjo un cambio significativo en la manera de Matemático que hizo contribuciones a la dinámica. participar en este: pasó de ser guiado para ahora guiar. No es que no necesite que se le orie nte como profesional de la docencia, esto es algo que sucederá obligatoriamente a nivel organizacional, Giacinto Morera , hijo de un acaudalado hombre de pero el hecho es que adquirirá una responsabilidad mucho mayor negocios, se graduó en ingeniería y matemáticas en la porque así como sus preceptores universitarios tuvieron el compromiso de formarlo y const ruirlo cultural y Universidad de Turín, Italia, habiendo asistido a los académicamente, él tendrá el mismo compromiso de hacerlo con cursos por Enrico D'Ovidio, Angelo Genocchi y sus discípulos, sea cual sea el nivel docente donde se desempeñe.
    [Show full text]
  • Continuous Nowhere Differentiable Functions
    2003:320 CIV MASTER’S THESIS Continuous Nowhere Differentiable Functions JOHAN THIM MASTER OF SCIENCE PROGRAMME Department of Mathematics 2003:320 CIV • ISSN: 1402 - 1617 • ISRN: LTU - EX - - 03/320 - - SE Continuous Nowhere Differentiable Functions Johan Thim December 2003 Master Thesis Supervisor: Lech Maligranda Department of Mathematics Abstract In the early nineteenth century, most mathematicians believed that a contin- uous function has derivative at a significant set of points. A. M. Amp`ereeven tried to give a theoretical justification for this (within the limitations of the definitions of his time) in his paper from 1806. In a presentation before the Berlin Academy on July 18, 1872 Karl Weierstrass shocked the mathematical community by proving this conjecture to be false. He presented a function which was continuous everywhere but differentiable nowhere. The function in question was defined by ∞ X W (x) = ak cos(bkπx), k=0 where a is a real number with 0 < a < 1, b is an odd integer and ab > 1+3π/2. This example was first published by du Bois-Reymond in 1875. Weierstrass also mentioned Riemann, who apparently had used a similar construction (which was unpublished) in his own lectures as early as 1861. However, neither Weierstrass’ nor Riemann’s function was the first such construction. The earliest known example is due to Czech mathematician Bernard Bolzano, who in the years around 1830 (published in 1922 after being discovered a few years earlier) exhibited a continuous function which was nowhere differen- tiable. Around 1860, the Swiss mathematician Charles Cell´erieralso discov- ered (independently) an example which unfortunately wasn’t published until 1890 (posthumously).
    [Show full text]
  • Bernhard Riemann 1826-1866
    Modern Birkh~user Classics Many of the original research and survey monographs in pure and applied mathematics published by Birkh~iuser in recent decades have been groundbreaking and have come to be regarded as foun- dational to the subject. Through the MBC Series, a select number of these modern classics, entirely uncorrected, are being re-released in paperback (and as eBooks) to ensure that these treasures remain ac- cessible to new generations of students, scholars, and researchers. BERNHARD RIEMANN (1826-1866) Bernhard R~emanno 1826 1866 Turning Points in the Conception of Mathematics Detlef Laugwitz Translated by Abe Shenitzer With the Editorial Assistance of the Author, Hardy Grant, and Sarah Shenitzer Reprint of the 1999 Edition Birkh~iuser Boston 9Basel 9Berlin Abe Shendtzer (translator) Detlef Laugwitz (Deceased) Department of Mathematics Department of Mathematics and Statistics Technische Hochschule York University Darmstadt D-64289 Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3 Gernmany Canada Originally published as a monograph ISBN-13:978-0-8176-4776-6 e-ISBN-13:978-0-8176-4777-3 DOI: 10.1007/978-0-8176-4777-3 Library of Congress Control Number: 2007940671 Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 01Axx, 00A30, 03A05, 51-03, 14C40 9 Birkh~iuser Boston All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the writ- ten permission of the publisher (Birkh~user Boston, c/o Springer Science+Business Media LLC, 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter de- veloped is forbidden.
    [Show full text]
  • Probability - Fall 2013 the Infinite Monkey Theorem (Lecture W 9/11)
    MATH 3160 - Fall 2013 Infinite Monkey Theorem MATH 3160 - Probability - Fall 2013 The Infinite Monkey Theorem (Lecture W 9/11) "It was the best of times, it was the blurst of times?! ...You stupid monkey!... Oh, shut up!" | Charles Montgomery Burns The main goal of this handout is to prove the following statement: Theorem 1 (Infinite monkey theorem). If a monkey hits the typewriter keys at random for an infinite amount of time, then he will almost surely produce any type of text, such as the entire collected works of William Shakespeare. To say that an event E happens almost surely means that it happens with probability 1: P (E) = 11. We will state a slightly stronger version of Theorem 1 and give its proof, which is actually not very hard. The key ingredients involve: • basics of convergent/divergent infinite series (which hopefully you already know!); • basic properties of the probability (measure) P (see Ross x2.4, done in lecture F 9/6); • the probability of a monotone increasing/decreasing sequence of events, which is the main content of Ross, Proposition 2.6.1; • the notion of independent events (which we will discuss properly next week, see Ross x3.4, but it's quite easy to state the meaning here). 1 Preliminaries In this section we outline some basic facts which will be needed later. The first two are hopefully familiar (or at least believable) if you have had freshman calculus: 1 While almost surely and surely often mean the same in the context of finite discrete probability problems, they differ when the events considered involve some form of infinity.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Q2 from Project 1, Nov 2011
    Best Q21 from project 1, Nov 2011 Introduction: For the site which demonstrates the imaginative use of random numbers in such a way that it could be used explain the details of the use of random numbers to an entire class, we chose a site that is based on the Infinite Monkey Theorem. This theorem hypothesizes that if you put an infinite number of monkeys at typewriters/computer keyboards, eventually one will type out the script of a Shakespearean work. This theorem asserts nothing about the intelligence of the one random monkey that eventually comes up with the script. It may be referred to semi-seriously when justifying a brute force method (the statement to be proved is split up into a finite number of cases and each case has to be checked to see if the proposition in question holds true); the implication is that, with enough resources thrown at it, any technical challenge becomes a “one-banana problem” (the idea that trained monkeys can do low level jobs). The site we chose is: http://www.vivaria.net/experiments/notes/publication/NOTES_EN.pdf. It was created by researchers at Paignton Zoo and the University of Plymouth, in Devon, England. They carried out an experiment for the infinite monkey theorem. The researchers reported that they had left a computer keyboard in the enclosure of six Sulawesi Crested Macaques for a month; it resulted in the monkeys produce nothing but five pages consisting largely of the letter S (shown on the link stated above). The monkeys began by attacking the keyboard with a stone, and followed by urinating on the keyboard and defecating on it.
    [Show full text]
  • Leonhard Euler: His Life, the Man, and His Works∗
    SIAM REVIEW c 2008 Walter Gautschi Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 3–33 Leonhard Euler: His Life, the Man, and His Works∗ Walter Gautschi† Abstract. On the occasion of the 300th anniversary (on April 15, 2007) of Euler’s birth, an attempt is made to bring Euler’s genius to the attention of a broad segment of the educated public. The three stations of his life—Basel, St. Petersburg, andBerlin—are sketchedandthe principal works identified in more or less chronological order. To convey a flavor of his work andits impact on modernscience, a few of Euler’s memorable contributions are selected anddiscussedinmore detail. Remarks on Euler’s personality, intellect, andcraftsmanship roundout the presentation. Key words. LeonhardEuler, sketch of Euler’s life, works, andpersonality AMS subject classification. 01A50 DOI. 10.1137/070702710 Seh ich die Werke der Meister an, So sehe ich, was sie getan; Betracht ich meine Siebensachen, Seh ich, was ich h¨att sollen machen. –Goethe, Weimar 1814/1815 1. Introduction. It is a virtually impossible task to do justice, in a short span of time and space, to the great genius of Leonhard Euler. All we can do, in this lecture, is to bring across some glimpses of Euler’s incredibly voluminous and diverse work, which today fills 74 massive volumes of the Opera omnia (with two more to come). Nine additional volumes of correspondence are planned and have already appeared in part, and about seven volumes of notebooks and diaries still await editing! We begin in section 2 with a brief outline of Euler’s life, going through the three stations of his life: Basel, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Georg Cantor English Version
    GEORG CANTOR (March 3, 1845 – January 6, 1918) by HEINZ KLAUS STRICK, Germany There is hardly another mathematician whose reputation among his contemporary colleagues reflected such a wide disparity of opinion: for some, GEORG FERDINAND LUDWIG PHILIPP CANTOR was a corruptor of youth (KRONECKER), while for others, he was an exceptionally gifted mathematical researcher (DAVID HILBERT 1925: Let no one be allowed to drive us from the paradise that CANTOR created for us.) GEORG CANTOR’s father was a successful merchant and stockbroker in St. Petersburg, where he lived with his family, which included six children, in the large German colony until he was forced by ill health to move to the milder climate of Germany. In Russia, GEORG was instructed by private tutors. He then attended secondary schools in Wiesbaden and Darmstadt. After he had completed his schooling with excellent grades, particularly in mathematics, his father acceded to his son’s request to pursue mathematical studies in Zurich. GEORG CANTOR could equally well have chosen a career as a violinist, in which case he would have continued the tradition of his two grandmothers, both of whom were active as respected professional musicians in St. Petersburg. When in 1863 his father died, CANTOR transferred to Berlin, where he attended lectures by KARL WEIERSTRASS, ERNST EDUARD KUMMER, and LEOPOLD KRONECKER. On completing his doctorate in 1867 with a dissertation on a topic in number theory, CANTOR did not obtain a permanent academic position. He taught for a while at a girls’ school and at an institution for training teachers, all the while working on his habilitation thesis, which led to a teaching position at the university in Halle.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantitative Hedge Fund Analysis and the Infinite Monkey Theorem
    Quantitative Hedge Fund Analysis and the Infinite Monkey Theorem Some have asserted that monkeys with typewriters, given enough time, could replicate Shakespeare. Don’t take the wager. While other financial denizens sarcastically note that given enough time there will be a few successes out of all the active money managers, building on the concept that even a blind pig will occasionally find a peanut. Alternatively, our goal in the attached white paper is to more reliably accelerate an investor’s search for sound and safe hedge fund and niche investments. We welcome all comments, suggestions and criticisms, too. Not kidding, really do! A brief abstract follows: Quantitative analysis is an important part of the hedge fund investment process that we divide into four steps: 1) data acquisition and preparation; 2) individual analysis; 3) comparative analysis versus peers and indices; 4) portfolio analysis. Step One: Data Acquisition and Preparation Understand sourced data by carefully reading all of the associated footnotes, considering who prepared it (whether the manager, the administrator or an auditor/review firm), and evaluating the standard of preparation, e.g., is it GIPS compliant? Step Two: Individual Analysis Here, we compare and contrast Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) to Average Annual Return (AAR), discuss volatility measures including time windowing and review the pros and cons of risk/reward ratios. Step Three: Comparative Analysis Any evaluations must be put into context. What are the alternatives, with greatness being a relative value. Step Four: Portfolio Analysis Too often, a single opportunity is considered in isolation, whereas its impact must be measured against a total portfolio of existing positions.
    [Show full text]