St. Helier, The Wrythe and Wandle Valley Local Committee 12 July 2018 efg 7.00 pm at the

Riverside Community Centre, 113 Culvers Avenue, , SM5 2FJ

To all members of the St. Helier, The Wrythe and Wandle Valley Local Committee:-

Chair: Councillor Hanna Zuchowska Vice-Chair Councillor Annie Moral Councillors: Ben Andrew, Jean Crossby, Vincent Galligan, Martin Gonzalez, Nali Patel, Colin Stears and Sam Weatherlake

Community Peter Alfrey, & Beddington Corner Neighbourhood Representatives Development Group (Substitute) (non-voting): Peter Haycox, The Circle Residents' Association Judith Smith, Horizon Church

This meeting will be recorded and made available on the Council’s website.

The council allows and welcomes any recording, photographing or filming of the proceedings of a council meeting or use of social media by any member of the public, media or councillor subject to it focusing on, and not disrupting, the meeting. Mobile devices can interfere with the wireless microphones and induction loop, and if that is the case the Chair may require that such devices are turned off. In order to facilitate the recording of meetings, members of the public or media are encouraged to contact [email protected] in advance of the meeting.

Niall Bolger Chief Executive 29 June 2018

Enquiries to: Cathy Hayward, Committee Services Officer Tel: 020 8770 4990 Email: [email protected] Copies of reports are available in large print on request A G E N D A

1. Welcome and introductions

2. Apologies for absence

3. Declarations of interest

4. Minutes of the previous meeting 1 - 8

To approve as a correct record the Minutes of the meeting held on 8 March 2018.

5. Appointment of Community Representative

It is recommended that the St Helier, The Wandle and The Wrythe Local Committee appoint Julia Armstrong to represent the Hackbridge and Beddington Corner Neighbourhood Development Group on the Local Committee and to confirm Peter Haycox as a substitute representative.

Indicative time: 5 minutes

6. St Helier Hospital Developments 9 - 58

A presentation from the Chief Executive of Epsom and St Helier on the investments in our hospitals 2020-2030.

Indicative time: 30 minutes

7. Sutton Council’s New Local Plan 59 - 68

A short presentation followed by questions on the council's new Local Plan, which was adopted in February 2018 and sets out the council's town planning priorities and policies.

Indicative time: 30 minutes

8. Parking Strategy Update 69 - 74

Following the recent consultation conducted this item is intended to feedback to the committee the results of the survey and the plan to proceed.

Indicative time: 20 minutes

9. Local Implementation Plan 75 - 80

Officer to provide a synopsis of schemes agreed for 2018/19 and ask for a decision on 2019/2020 proposed schemes.

Indicative time: 30 minutes

10. Recommendations Tracker 81 - 86

The recommendations tracker allows Committee Members to monitor responses, actions and outcomes against their recommendations or requests for further actions. This is updated following each Committee. Once an item is completed it will be removed from the tracker.

Indicative time: 10 minutes

11. Public realm projects and priorities and Neighbourhood Grants 87 - 98

The Locality Lead Officer will present a report to the Committee, which outlines new public realm schemes for approval and gives an update on the progress of current schemes.

Indicative time: 10 minutes

12. Public Questions

This item is an opportunity for members of the public to raise points or questions about local issues that are not already on the agenda.

If you wish to submit a question prior to the meeting, please send it to [email protected] at least 5 workings days in advance and we will endeavour to obtain a written response for the meeting.

Please be aware your question and name will be published in the minutes of the meeting.

Indicative time: 10 minutes

13. Any urgent business brought forward at the direction of the chair

The Chair must approve the reason for the urgency.

14. Date of next meeting

The next meeting of the St Helier, The Wrythe and Wandle Valley Local Committee will take place on 11 October 2018 at 7 pm at All Saints Centre, New Road, Hackbridge. This page is intentionally left blank Page 1 Agenda Item 4 St. Helier, The Wrythe and Wandle Valley Local Committee 8 March 2018

ST. HELIER, THE WRYTHE AND WANDLE VALLEY LOCAL COMMITTEE

8 March 2018 at 7.00 pm

MEMBERS: Councillor Hanna Zuchowska (Chair), Councillor Colin Stears (Vice-Chair) and Councillors Margaret Court, Martin Gonzalez and Jason Reynolds

ABSENT: Councillors Doug Hunt, Callum Morton and Nali Patel

30. WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS

The Chair welcomed those present to the committee meeting.

31. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE

Apologies were received from Councillors Doug Hunt, Callum Morton and Nali Patel.

32. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

There were no declarations of interest.

33. MINUTES OF THE LAST MEETING

The minutes of the meeting held on 12 October 2017 were agreed and signed as a correct record.

34. PARKING STRATEGY

Mervyn Bartlett provided the Committee with an update in relation to the Parking Strategy.

Local Residents raised the following concerns -

 Would Hackbridge be included in phase 1  The phases are taking a long time, can specific areas be given immediate attention  The surveys were sent out just before Christmas, which may have resulted in the poor returns

1 Agenda Item 4 Page 2 St. Helier, The Wrythe and Wandle Valley Local Committee 8 March 2018

Mervyn Bartlett informed the Committee that the plan had since been updated, but that the whole of the local committee area is being looked at, including Hackbridge. It was confirmed that all parking issues would be examined and dealt with using the same general approach as would be adopted right across the borough. Data would be looked at carefully and it is anticipated that specific proposals would be submitted back to the local committee at a later date. Based on experience elsewhere the rate of responses to the surveys was considered good.

The Chair commented that there is a process to follow and any further delays in accumulating data would delay the process even more.

The Committee noted the update.

35. UPDATE FROM THE SAFER NEIGHBOURHOOD TEAM

Sergeant Lee Burgess attended the Committee and provided an update on the following key points:

St Helier  Anti Social Behaviour concerns around Stavordale Road and St Helier Hospital - multiple charges and security training has been provided.  Youth Engagement Workers are now placed in the Open Spaces for the long term  17% reduction in crime in the last 3 months

The Wrythe  10% reduction in crime in the last 3 months  Anti Social Behaviour concerns - arrests and convictions ongoing  BP - petrol station - Green Wrythe Lane - on site security now

Wandle Valley  11% reduction in crime over the last 3 months  Motorbikes on land - Hackbridge, Mill Green (open space) - multiple operations ongoing  Parking - enforcements, signage and fence line to be repaired and installation of CCTV

Sgt Burgess reminded everyone about the Twitter account and encouraged everyone to follow it.

2 Page 3 Agenda Item 4 St. Helier, The Wrythe and Wandle Valley Local Committee 8 March 2018

Local residents raised the following concerns -  Millside area having issues with drug dealing, vandalism and attempted break-ins to garages - reported several times over the last 3 months.  Shaftesbury Road - motor-cycle theft, police action not having an impact.

Sgt Burgess informed the Committee that he take up the issues that have been raised, but he is unable to provide any assurances in relation to specific issues raised e.g. motor-cycle theft, as he will need to get to the causes of it and target individuals. There are ongoing operations in the area and he is working within the legal system, but changes are coming to the force’s policies which will assist this process and a number of concerns are being monitored currently.

Councillor Reynolds informed the Committee that a mechanism was being put in place to stop bikers going across Polters Park.

The Committee noted the update.

36. PETITION: SPEED HUMPS AND 20MPH SPEED LIMIT ON STAVORDALE ROAD, CARSHALTON,

Petitioner presented the petition to the Committee and identified the issues relating to the petition prayer.

Councillor Margaret Court supported the petition and informed the Committee that it also affects other areas around Stavordale Road and it would only be a matter of time before someone is injured, including a child.

Hitesh Wadher (Highways and Transport) informed the Committee that the issues raised in the petition prayer would be investigated and funding would be sought from TfL relating to the petition prayer and a report would be submitted to the next meeting.

The Committee noted the petition.

37. THE SUTTON PLAN

Simon Breeze provided an update on the Sutton Plan to the Committee.

Local Residents raised the following concerns in relation to the Sutton Plan -

 Population increase has not been taken into account  Concerns about the volume of houses in the Hackbridge area

3 Agenda Item 4 Page 4 St. Helier, The Wrythe and Wandle Valley Local Committee 8 March 2018

 Local residents are becoming disillusioned by nothing being done by the council  Constant reports and issues being raised, but nothing is being done and things are not working.  Unemployment is not featured in the plan.  Local residents do not have confidence in the Council and its processes and infrastructure

Simon Breeze informed the Committee that the Sutton Plan takes into account the demographic profile of the borough in the draft plan and highlights the age gap that currently exists in relation to the 20-40 age band. He thanked the local residents for their feedback and informed the Committee that the issues raised would be fed back into the plan.

Victoria Jeffrey (Head of Local Place & Engagement) explained how the Local Plan would feed into the Sutton Plan and commented on the housing situation in the borough and how it related to the Mayor of London and the Local Plan.

The local residents and Committee Members were invited to participate in table top discussions regarding the priorities identified in the Sutton Plan.

The Chair thanked everyone for their participation and involvement in the table top discussions and for providing feedback which will be captured and fed into the Sutton Plan.

38. RECOMMENDATIONS TRACKER

Claire Smith (Locality Lead Officer) presented a report on the progress of recommendations from previous meetings of the committee relating to -

 28/01/17 - Carshalton Boys Sports College and Waltham Road - Zebra Crossing proposal : School sent out letters to approx 20 residents. However, only one positive response received from a resident not close to the proposed zebra location.. Committee suggested to proceed to informal consultation in May.  12/10/17 - Private land in Hackbridge

The Committee noted the update.

39. HIGHWAYS UPDATES

Hitesh Wadher provided the following update relating to existing and future schemes -

4 Page 5 Agenda Item 4 St. Helier, The Wrythe and Wandle Valley Local Committee 8 March 2018

2017/18 TfL LiP schemes  Denmark Road zebra crossing is now started and will take 3/4 weeks to complete.  Middleton Road - Existing cycle lane will be refreshed and tactile paving will be installed at side roads to improve walking for pedestrians  Wrythe Lane - tactile paving will be underway shortly  Rosehill - one way extension - To start on site at the beginning of April 2018

2018/19 TfL LiP schemes  Currently collecting speed, traffic and accident data for schemes to carry out preliminary designs.  Report back to the July 2018 meeting

Local residents  Potholes - recently resurfaced is now in need of repair after the weather - cul de sac around Millside and Culvers Avenue  Cycle paths - use of pavements for cycle paths, which bye-law has been passed to allow the installation of cycle paths on the pavements

Hitesh Wadher informed the Committee that he will take the issues raised back to the appropriate team in relation to the potholes maintenance.

The Committee noted the update and agreed that a written response be sent to the questioner relating to cycle paths.

40. PUBLIC REALM PROJECTS AND PRIORITIES & NEIGHBOURHOOD GRANTS

Claire Smith (Locality Lead Officer) delivered an update on the Public Realm budget and presented on the Neighbourhood Grants funded since the last meeting. She provided the Committee with information on completed and upcoming public realm projects including Royston Park and the installation of new equipment which was well received.

The Committee noted the update.

41. PUBLIC QUESTIONS

Residents at the meeting were invited to ask questions, and those who had submitted and received a response to a question outside of the meeting (published as an addendum to the agenda) were invited to ask a supplementary question.

5 Agenda Item 4 Page 6 St. Helier, The Wrythe and Wandle Valley Local Committee 8 March 2018

1. Questioner - Andy Behan - Humps warning sign on Whitland Road reported back in May 2017, October 2017, new sign would be erected. 10 months since the original complaint.

The Chair informed the Committee that the 10 months to wait on a response and get some action was unacceptable. Officers will be asked to look into it as a matter of urgency.

Claire Smith informed the Committee that the Interim Head of the Shared Environment Service would like to apologise for the time taken to resolve this particular issues, but thanks the public for their questions and in due course there will be a review of the process and procedures to ensure that issues that are raised will be resolved in a timely fashion in the future.

2. Questioner - Nikki Sutton - outstanding question from last meeting in relation to the framework that would be put in place to prevent residents going into fuel poverty following the agreement of a contract for 25 years with Barratt Homes where heating networks are unregulated.

Agreed that the Chair will provide a written response.

3. Questioner - Nikki Sutton - lighting down the towpath back of Corbett Close, there is street light, but very intermittent. It is without street lights, the normal street lights keep going off and not been working since Christmas

Agreed that the Chair will raise with officers.

4. Questioner - Helena Barrowclough - raised concerns relating to the level of construction dust/dirt on London and Hackbridge Road. Conditions have been placed on the company with a wash truck but it is not having much impact. Concerned about the health and safety of the local residents during the forthcoming summer months.

Agreed that if the planning enforcement is not being met, then will ask the planning officers to see if anything else can be enforced or changed to benefit the local residents.

5. Questioner - Mr Fish - The Development at Hackbridge, does the Council have any conditions for developer, to offer the houses for sale to local residents and British residents first, rather than flog them to the foreign investors?

Agreed that the Chair seek a response from planning officers.

6 Page 7 Agenda Item 4 St. Helier, The Wrythe and Wandle Valley Local Committee 8 March 2018

6. Questioner - Mr Fish - empty shops in Sutton and Times Square, the population increasing and the number of shops is decreasing and there are fewer jobs in Sutton. Is the Council aware, or concerned about this issue.

The Chair informed the Committee that it is being looked at through the Sutton Plan and was raised during the table top discussions.

7. Questioner - Sharon Crayden - when will Royston Park be completed?

Claire Smith informed the Committee that Royston Park is currently out to tender and no completion date has yet been set.

8. Questioner - Sharon Crayden - with the new CPZ, on a road by road analysis, residents with drop curb, for 2 parking spaces, are they still entitled to buy 3 Parking Permits or are those 2 taken away from the total?

Agreed that a written response be sought and sent to the questioner.

9. Questioner – Andy Beadle - 5 Ward Councillors attending the meeting for the last 2 meetings, why are they not attending the meetings?

The Chair informed the meeting that she was unable to answer for other absent councillors, but the Committee did receive apologies for absence.

42. ANY URGENT BUSINESS BROUGHT FORWARD AT THE DIRECTION OF THE CHAIR

There was no urgent business brought forward.

The meeting ended at 8.50 pm

Chair: Date:

7 This page is intentionally left blank Strategic outline case

for investment in our Page 9 hospitals 2020–2030

November 2017 Agenda Item 6

1 The SOC describes the different Agenda Item 6 scenarios the Trust has modelled to create a clinically and financially viable future Page 10

2 Our current performance is strong - this is a sound basis for looking at our future Page 11 Agenda Item 6

3 We propose that our commitments until Agenda Item 6 2020 will be maintained until the changes outlined in the SOC are implemented

Both Epsom Hospital and St Helier Hospital will continue to provide 24/7 care across A&E, Page 12 maternity and inpatient children’s services

St Helier Hospital will provide specialist and emergency care, such as acute surgery for the sickest patients

Epsom Hospital will expand its range of planned care. 4 Page 13 Case for change Agenda Item 6 Agenda Item 6 There are three major elements of our case for change

1. Clinical viability Page 14

2. Estates functionality

3. Financial viability

6 Clinical viability - providing care for the sickest patients across two acute sites is increasingly difficult and even harder to meet the NHS’ aspirations for a seven day service

• Meeting these standards across two acute sites means we need c. 52 more consultants - a 22% increase Page 15 • Due to shortages in available consultants we will continue to struggle to recruit to these additional posts • We will need additional middle grade and junior doctors to staff rotas • We struggle to recruit to these posts and rely on temporary staff; in the three months from Feb to April 2016, we spent Agenda Item 6 over £2.1m on temporary medical staffing

7 Estates challenges - over 80% of the estate is Agenda Item 6 not functionally suitable for modern healthcare delivery

Insufficient bed Page 16 spacing at St Helier

Improved bed spacing at purpose- built SWLEOC 8 Estate challenges - to bring the acute facilities at St Helier up to standard will require £398 million Page 17

Funding already secured £190m

Additional funding

Required Agenda Item 6 £208m

9 Agenda Item 6 Financial viability – we are currently spending c. £37m more annually than we receive in funding Page 18

10 And if we carry on with the same service configuration we will have a deficit of £40m each year by 2025 Page 19 Agenda Item 6

The deficit is growing by c. £1m each year 11 Agenda Item 6 We cannot sustain the delivery of acute services at two sites in perpetuity

• We will not be able to meet the required seven day Page 20 clinical quality standards

• We will not have an estate that is fit for purpose

• We will have an ever increasing deficit that prevents us from investing in the staffing and buildings

12 Proposed Page 21 clinical model Agenda Item 6 85% of patients treated at Epsom and St Helier will Agenda Item 6 see no change to where they receive their care – but will be cared for in improved buildings Antenatal and postnatal care

Local A&E – urgent

and emergency care Page 22 open 24/7 Elective procedures

Outpatients and diagnostics South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre (Epsom Hospital)

Elderly care services and Renal dialysis (St Helier inpatient beds Hospital) 14 At the same time as keeping all of that care local, we want a single specialist acute facility so that we can provide the best possible care for our sickest and most at-risk patients (15% of our patients)

Inpatient Major A&E paediatrics Page 23

Complex Babies born emergency in hospital medicine Agenda Item 6 Critical care Emergency surgery and trauma

Critical Care and Emergency Surgery / Trauma already consolidated at St Helier Agenda Item 6 Page 24 Engagement We engaged on three scenarios to deliver this clinical model Page 25 Agenda Item 6 Over 13 weeks we engaged extensively Agenda Item 6 with the local communities

“tCI is happy to confirm that We hosted four ‘Talk and Tour’ events your pre-engagement work We held 31 staff briefing sessions so far – leading to your Pre- We worked with Healthwatch , engagement Report – has Sutton and Surrey Page 26 met tCI’s criteria for best- We contacted: practice pre-consultation” • Seven MPs and six Councils The Consultation Institute (tCI) • 28 residents’ associations and local groups • 360 GPs and practice • 39 libraries • 420 Patient First members • Religious groups, LGBT groups, schools and colleges and carer forums 18 c. 25,000 people actively took part in the engagement with a reach of c. 200,000 in our catchment • Attended 47 local meetings and events meeting with over 2,000 people • Held 31 drop in sessions and meetings internally

reaching over 2,500 staff Page 27 • 11,977 people visited our website page on 2020-2030 • 6,310 people viewed our video • 441 people signed to support • 1,059 individual questionnaires were completed Agenda Item 6 We received widespread media coverage (one Evening Standard article reached c. 7 million people alone) Twitter reached 133,800 people just in June Sutton, Epsom and Wimbledon Guardians reached over 187,000 readers 19 89% agree with our aim to provide as Agenda Item 6 much care as possible from our existing hospital sites Page 28

20 79.8% agree that we have made the case that we will improve patient care by bringing together our services for our sickest or most at-risk patients onto a new specialist acute facility on one site Page 29 Agenda Item 6

21 Agenda Item 6 4.7% thought we should consider any other scenarios and provided their ideas Page 30

22 50 people proposed different scenarios which can be grouped into six main themes • Build a new super hospital • Close one or both hospitals Page 31 • Acute facilities on both or all three sites • Separating Epsom and St Helier or merging with another trust • Rebuild St Helier Hospital Agenda Item 6 • Change services or location

23 Agenda Item 6 37 stakeholders responded broadly in favour of the proposed clinical model

Trust staff: All 36 senior nurses and over 240 consultants signed a public letter of support. “We believe that the Epsom and St Helier team is better together, and that Page 32 we should continue to work as one team, one trust. “We support the proposal to make our buildings fit for purpose and develop a single, state-of-the-art facility to care for our sickest patients”

Trade unions / Staffside partnership representatives: A joint letter of support was received from

• The Royal College of Nursing • Society of Radiographers • Chartered Society of • British and Irish Orthoptic Society • Physiotherapists • Royal College of Midwives • UNISON • British Medical Association

24 37 Stakeholders responded broadly in favour of the proposed clinical model

Local authorities: • Epsom and Ewell Borough Council •

• Mole Valley District Council Page 33 • Reigate and Banstead Borough Council Local MPs: • Sir Paul Beresford MP for Mole Valley • Crispin Blunt MP for Reigate • Tom Brake MP for Carshalton and Wallington

• Stephen Hammond MP for Wimbledon, , and Agenda Item 6 Motspur Park • Paul Scully MP for Sutton and Epsom and Ewell Liberal Democrats 25 Agenda Item 6 37 Stakeholders responded broadly in favour of the proposed clinical model

12 residents’ associations:

Standing Committee of Residents’ • Belmont and South Cheam Page 34 Associations in a joint letter with Residents’ Association and Belmont, residents’ associations in Epsom and South Sutton and South Cheam Ewell: Neighbourhood Forum

Ewell Village Epsom Town • Bookham Residents’ Association Ewell Downs Nonsuch Stamford Ward College Ward • Cobham and Downside Residents’ Ashtead West Ewell and Association Ruxley • Shanklin Village Residents’ Association

26 37 Stakeholders responded broadly in favour of the proposed clinical model

The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

South West London acute hospital trusts: • Kingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Page 35 • Health Services NHS Trust • St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Surrey Heartlands Health and Care Partnership Transformation Board (STP) Agenda Item 6

27 Agenda Item 6 One stakeholder responded broadly neutral of the proposed clinical model

“Surrey County Council supports Epsom and St Helier University Hospital NHS Trust’s need to engage with Surrey Page 36 residents on the quality and sustainability of their local health services.”

Surrey County Council

28 17 stakeholders responded not in favour of the proposed clinical model

Those responding not in favour include • and 13 of its councillors • Central Medical Practice

• Dr Rosena Allin-Khan, MP for Page 37 • Carshalton and Wallington Labour Party • Siobhain McDonagh, MP for and Morden Two stakeholders who do not think that it is the appropriate time to be undertaking Agenda Item 6 this work or raised additional concerns • Chris Grayling, MP for Epsom 29 Agenda Item 6 We received 23 petitions from local groups and 193 letters from people campaigning not to shut services at St Helier Hospital

• 15 from local groups signed by 2,855 people to keep services at St Page 38 Helier • Seven from Morden primary schools signed by 566 people to keep services at St Helier • One general petition where 1,573 people responded against closure of services at St Helier and to build the new hospital at St Helier organised buy the Labour Party in Merton

30 Key themes of the main issues raised were: access, deprivation / health inequalities; and impact on other hospitals

• There were over 400 mentions of transport in response received Page 39 • 18 people mentioned deprivation and health inequalities as being critical to determining the location of an acute hospital in their responses • 32 of the letters we received mentioned families and children

• Two councillors and one MP wrote to highlight health issues Agenda Item 6 • Over 50 people included comments about the impact on other hospitals

31 Other issues raised Agenda Item 6

• Which services will be in the specialist acute site and what will be kept local and the evidence of why this change will improve outcomes

• Concern over what will happen to the sites where the acute facility Page 40 is not located in the long term • Need for assurance that this is for NHS patients not private patients • Where the money is going to come from to build the new acute facility and how much it will cost to borrow this money • The process of how a decision will be made • The timescale to get permission to build and what will happen to the sites and services in the short term.

32 Technical Page 41 analysis Agenda Item 6 Agenda Item 6 We are broadly expecting to have a similar number of beds to now

Sutton Acute Epsom St Helier primary with facilities on primary primary The Royal Page 42 two sites Marsden

Beds Number of beds at the Trust 1,026 beds 834 beds 914 beds 1,012 beds

Beds required at neighbouring 0 beds 158 beds 80 beds 10 beds hospitals Total 1,026 beds 992 beds 994 beds 1,022 beds

34 Capital requirement (currently unfunded) ranges from £208 to £444 million. This is £129 and £236 million more than maintaining two acute sites Sutton Acute facilities on Epsom St Helier primary with two sites primary primary The Royal Marsden Epsom and St Helier 208 291 356 416 Page 43 Other hospitals 0 86 40 28 Total capital investment £208 million £377 million £396 million £444 million required

We have used Department of Health methodology to calculate the cost of the new building and refurbishment on each site. Agenda Item 6 We have looked at patient flows to other providers and made allowance for capital that they would need in each of the scenarios. The model assumes funding borrowed at 3% - we have modelled PF2 and this is significantly more expensive. 35 Moving to a single acute facility will save Agenda Item 6 between £37 million and £57 million every year

Benefit Financial benefits Workforce Reducing reliance on agency staff £16 - £19 million

Technology Implementing digital technologies £6 - £8 million Page 44

Buildings that are fit Reduced costs of maintaining and £11 - £13 million for purpose operating the estate

Efficiency Reducing length of stay £2 - £6 million

Complex and private Increase Trust income from private £4 million services patients by c 1%

A further £8m of savings would be realised from the benefits of co-location with The Royal Marsden. 36 Bringing acute services together into a new specialist acute facility significantly reduces the Trust’s annual deficit by at least £36 million Page 45 Agenda Item 6

37 Agenda Item 6 Page 46 The scenarios Continue with two acute sites scenario (this does not deliver clinical and finical viability) Page 47 Agenda Item 6 Epsom primary scenario Agenda Item 6 Page 48

At Epsom Hospital the new facility would be located at the front of the hospital

40 St Helier primary scenario Page 49

At St Helier Hospital the new facility would be Agenda Item 6 located at the back of the hospital with a new multi-storey car park built on the current visitors car park 41 Sutton primary (co-located with The Royal Agenda Item 6 Marsden) Page 50

At Sutton the new facility would be co- located with The Royal Marsden on land owned by Epsom and St Helier and The Royal Marsden Page 51 Conclusions Agenda Item 6 We cannot continue running acute Agenda Item 6 services on two sites

We will not be able to meet all of the clinical standards expected of us. Page 52 We will continue to be clinically and financially unviable and will not have the appropriate buildings to deliver 21st century healthcare.

This is not an option we believe is acceptable for our patients and our staff.

44 Our proposed clinical model makes us clinically and financially viable In each of the consolidation of the six acute services scenarios we have sufficient workforce to deliver all the required clinical standards. Page 53 The absolute difference between any of the scenarios and the maintain two acute sites scenario is significant but the relative benefit between the three scenarios is relatively small.

Significant capital investment is required in each of the scenarios of between £377 and £444 million. Agenda Item 6

There is not a preferred scenario which can be identified at this stage. 45 Overall financial summary Agenda Item 6

Sutton primary Acute facilities on Epsom primary St Helier primary with The Royal two sites Marsden

Beds Number of beds at the 1,026 834 914 1,012 Trust Page 54 Beds required at 0 158 80 10 neighbouring hospitals Total 1,026 beds 992 beds 994 beds 1,022 beds

Capital Epsom and St Helier 208 291 356 416 Other hospitals 0 86 40 28 Total capital investment £208 million £377 million £396 million £444 million required

Return on investment NHS n/a 7% 8% 10%

Trust's financial position (£40 million) (£4 million) (£4 million) 2025-26 £5 million surplus deficit deficit deficit 46 Further work is needed with commissioners to enable preferred option(s) to be consulted on

Commissioners will need to work with stakeholders and the public to determine the non-financial criteria that should be used to evaluate the scenarios in future using Page 55 the information already provided.

This needs to include the themes picked up in the engagement - Access Agenda Item 6 - Deprivation and Health Inequalities - Impact on other hospitals.

47 Agenda Item 6 Timeline for next steps

Activity Indicative timeline

Agreement to proceed December 2017 Page 56 Pre-consultation / outline business case June 2018 completed (if required) Summer/autumn Public consultation (if required) 2018 Decision on outcome of public Spring 2019 consultation

If the Trust was to proceed with developing new facilities, it is initially envisaged that these could be open in 2024-26. This would be subject to an intense period of work including developing planning permissions and producing a full business case. 48 Thank You Page 57 Agenda Item 6

• Website: www.epsom-sthelier.nhs.uk • Twitter: @epsom_sthelier • Facebook: www.facebook.com/epsomsthelier This page is intentionally left blank Page 59

Sutton’s New Local Plan St Helier, The Wrythe & Wandle Valley Local Committee Agenda Item 7 12th July 2018

take part, take pride Agenda Item 7 A Local Plan… What is a • Sets out long-term ambitions for the borough Local Plan and • Consistent basis for the story so deciding planning far applications Page 60

The story so far… • Consulted on Issues and Options in the spring 2016 • Produced a draft Local Plan for consultation in early 2017 • Submitted to Planning Inspector in Spring 2017 • Examination in Public Hearings September 2017 • Consultation on Modifications in November 2017 • Adopted at Full Council February 2018

take part, take pride Achieving Growth, Protecting Character Page 61 Agenda Item 7

take part, take pride Agenda Item 7 What the 427 Inspector endorsed Page 62

take part, take pride What the Inspector endorsed Page 63 Agenda Item 7

take part, take pride Agenda Item 7 What the Inspector endorsed Page 64

take part, take pride Where the Inspector disagreed Page 65 Required de-designation of MOL for industry in Beddington Set affordable housing target of 35% on privately owned sites Reduced the proportion of family homes in Sutton Town Centre to 25% Required a Gypsy and Traveller review by 2023 Agenda Item 7

take part, take pride Agenda Item 7 Site Site Allocations = 95 Allocations

Site Allocations New Housing Page 66 London Cancer Hub 1 0% Sutton 41 55% Hackbridge 5 15% Wallington 13 10% Other District Centres 10 10% Suburban Heartlands 25 10%

take part, take pride What Next? • Elm Grove Planning Brief SPD • Urban Design Guide SPD • Public Realm Guide SPD

• Affordable Housing SPD Page 67 • Possible Sutton Town Centre Estates Area Action Plan • South London Waste Plan DPD • Gypsy and Traveller Plan • Community Infrastructure Levy Agenda Item 7

take part, take pride Agenda Item 7 Contact Us

Where can I look at the Local Plan?

• www.sutton.gov.uk/localplan or at your local library Page 68

How do I contact you? • send an email to [email protected]

take part, take pride

Parking Strategy

Local Committee Update July '18 Page 69

Agenda Item 8 Phase 2 Agenda Item 8 Local Committee Consultation Area Page 70

St Helier, The Wrythe and Wandle Valley LC What has happened so far?

❖ Informal Consultation 17th November 17 to 12th January 18. ❖ Approx. 43,000 households consulted across 5 LC areas, but main focus on Sutton Local and St Helier, The Wrythe Wandle Valley. Page 71 ❖ 5,324 completed questionnaires returned ❖ Data logged, including approx 3,500 comments. ❖ Specifics for SHTWWV LC area are shown on the following slides, but it noted that the feedback was different to that of the wider consultation area.

Agenda Item 8

Agenda Item 8 St Helier, The Wrythe and Wandle Valley LC Local Committee Specifics

❖ Key findings are shown below. To place the St Helier response in context, scores for the wider consultation area are shown (in brackets) when there is a significant difference. ❖ 87% had a problem with parking in St Helier (65%), and weekday parking was the main issue in St Helier, where 94% indicated a problem (83%). 27% reported problems on Saturdays and 23% on Sundays (20% and 21%) ❖ 55% of St Helier residents reported that the problem was an all-day issue (29%). Evenings were Page 72 a problem period for 31% of residents and mornings 28%. ❖ The specific question on CPZ in their street identified 47% in favour (35%), 16% were undecided, 28% against (42%) and 9% did not reply ❖ 87% of respondents had one or more vehicles (91%), and 41% of those owning a vehicle parked it on the road (34%). ❖ A review of the specific comments shows that the issues were mainly in relation to hospital staff and visitors parking in residential streets. St Helier, The Wrythe and Wandle Valley LC What is happening next?

❖ Design of scheme options is currently underway, based on the consultation results and comments. ❖ The next stage of public consultation will start in September 2018, with details of scheme proposals available on line and opportunities for drop in sessions to discuss these with officers.

❖ The outcomes of the second stage of consultations will then be Page 73 reviewed in October/November 2018. ❖ Subject to their being continued support for proposals, these will then be subject to the Statutory Consultation process for making Traffic Management Orders in November/December 2018. ❖ Any objections will be resolved in early January 2019, with the Implementation of any Parking Schemes then looking to commence in March/April 2019. Agenda Item 8

This page is intentionally left blank Page 75 Agenda Item 9

Report to: St Helier, The Wrythe & Wandle Date: 12 July 2018 Valley

Report title: Local Implementation Plan - Traffic Schemes for 2019/20

Report from: Warren Shadbolt - Assistant Director Environment, Housing & Regeneration

Ward/Areas affected: St Helier, The Wrythe and Wandle Valley

Chair of Committee/Lead Councillor Hanna Zuchowska Member: Author(s)/Contact Hitesh Wadher, Highways & Transport, 020 8770 5946 Number(s): Corporate Plan Priorities: ● An Open Council ● A Green Council Open/Exempt: Open

Signed: Date: 4 June 2018

1. Summary

1.1 This report outlines the proposed schemes to be considered for inclusion in the 2019/20 bid to Transport for London (TfL). The report also indicates the programme for the development and submission of the Local Implementation Plan (LIP) 3 document, for which a draft paper needs to be prepared by 2 November 2018, and is being developed in parallel with the Annual Spending Submission.

2. Recommendations

It is recommended that St Helier, The Wrythe and Wandle Valley Local Committee:

2.1 Support the proposed schemes as listed in the table in item 3.11 below and agree they be considered for inclusion in the submission to Transport for London in November 2018 for the 2019/20 programme.

2.2 Note that schemes 1 and 2 in paragraph 3.11 are continuations of schemes agreed previously at the 6 July 2017 St Helier, The Wrythe and Wandle Valley Local Committee.

Agenda Item 9 Page 76

2.3 Agree inclusion of schemes 3 & 4 in paragraph 3.11 as new schemes for the 2019/20 LIP programme.

3. Background / Issues

3.1 TfL funding is provided to boroughs to support local transport improvements that accord with the Mayor’s Transport Strategy (MTS) goals, as set out in the Authority (GLA) Act 1999. In order to achieve funding the Council must show how each scheme submitted will support the MTS goals, and with the recently published MTS this means that boroughs must demonstrate how proposals will support the vision to transform London streets, improve public transport and create more opportunities for new homes and jobs.

3.2 The borough’s current LIP, version 2 was approved with an original investment programme for the three years from 2011-2014, and was then followed with an updated three-year LIP Delivery Plan covering the period from April 2014 to April 2017 and since that time there have been two years of interim arrangements. A new LIP 3 document is now required to set out how the borough will deliver the MTS over the life of that document, until 2041.

3.3 LIP 3 must introduce schemes that aim to achieve ambitious targets to encourage more walking and cycling, and increase access to and use of public transport.

3.4 The basis for the MTS setting boroughs ambitious targets is based on the expectation that the composition of London’s population is expected to change, altering the emphasis of future demand pressures on the transport networks. In particular, it is believed that there will be an increase in the numbers of older people – particularly focused in outer London – leading to increased demand for accessible services.

3.5 TfL have advised that travel demand is expected to increase to around 32 million trips on an average day by 2041, 5 million more than today. Despite a broad pattern of falling car mode share across London, car kilometres will rise by around 8%. This reflects the distribution of trips, with more car travel in outer London where trips are longer, and hence there is the need to ensure that most of the additional travel demand will be met through more use of public transport, walking and cycling.

3.6 Guided by the ‘Healthy Streets’ agenda, outlined in the Mayor’s recent ‘City for all Londoners’ document, this new approach aims to prioritise active travel, making walking, cycling and public transport use the best choices for travel, encouraging the most efficient methods of essential travel for people and goods, and creating more attractive, accessible and people-friendly streets.

3.7 The Healthy Street approach is based on 10 Indicators which focus on the experience of people using streets.

Page 77 Agenda Item 9

There are two main indicators:-

● Pedestrians from all walks of life ● People choose to walk, cycle and use public transport.

There are eight other indicators that point to the essential elements required to support these two main indicators:

● Easy to Cross ● Shade and Shelter ● Places to stop and rest ● Not too noisy ● People feel safe ● Things to see and do ● People feel relaxed ● Clean air.

3.8 Historically, the annual submission prepared for TfL sought to identify a range of smaller schemes at sites or junctions, which ultimately delivered very focussed transport improvements at a local level. The guidance and drive behind the Healthy Streets agenda is to focus on improving the infrastructure across broader areas, where improvements can be considered in a more ‘strategic manner’, that is to say where there are clear opportunities for improved modal choice towards encouraging people to make journeys by walking, cycling or because of improved access to public transport.

3.9 Inevitably this will mean that there will be fewer, but larger and higher quality schemes being delivered and it will be important that as part of the development of LIP 3, that the scheme proposals being considered are linked to provide area wide coverage to ensure that the modal choice opportunities are built on across wider areas. At this stage TfL advise that there is still Local Transport Funding (LTF) available to consider smaller scale interventions.

3.10 The schemes listed in the table below have been identified by officers. They have been suggested after looking at the personal injury collision statistics for the borough, areas suitable for 20mph zones and other ‘Healthy Street’ measures, to encourage people to walk, cycle or take public transport for their local journeys.

3.11 The first two schemes in the table below were agreed in the 2018/19 Annual Spending Plan, and are in the current year’s programme for investigation, preliminary design and consultation. These schemes are now included in 2019/20 programme to secure funding for implementation. Schemes 3 & 4 are new schemes which will be investigated in 2019/20 followed by implementation in 2020/21.

Agenda Item 9 Page 78

Location Possible scheme

1 Wrythe Lane - between Welbeck To investigate a cluster of personal injury Road & St Helier Hospital accidents along Wrythe Lane. Measures to be identified in 2018/19 and implementation to be completed in 2019/20.

2 London Road/Goat Road Third worst accident spot in the borough. Junction improvement options to be investigated in 2018/19 for implementation in 2019/20.

(On borough boundary - Joint working with LB Merton)

3 Stavordale Road area - speed Investigate speed reduction measures reduction measures including 20mph zone. Petition received from Circle Community Residents Association in Feb 2018.

4 Area improvement scheme - Area Investigate measures to reduce speeds, bounded by Wrythe Lane, improve walking and cycling facilities. Tweedale Road and Winchcombe Road.

3.12 Other schemes may be funded via LIP funding in the local area but have not yet been identified.

3.13 The four schemes have not been investigated fully yet so no options or cost estimate can be provided at this time. However, depending on the scheme option and its cost estimate, there may be more schemes than there is funding available, which may require schemes to be prioritised.

3.14 It is anticipated that £100,000 will still be available for the Local Transport Fund split between the local committees in 2019/20. This local committee is expected to have an allocation of £17,747 and the schemes can be decided at a later date.

3.15 Environment and Neighbourhoods Committee will agree the schemes to be submitted to TfL at the meeting on 20 September 2018.

3.16 This committee is being asked to support the schemes identified and agree they be considered for inclusion in the submission to TfL in November 2018.

Page 79 Agenda Item 9

4. Options Considered

4.1 Traffic schemes are proposed by Ward Councillors, community representatives, new developments and officers to meet transport targets. Each scheme is investigated and options considered before proposing the most suitable scheme to meet the desired objectives and budgetary provision.

5. Impacts and Implications

Financial

5.1 The Council is anticipating an allocation of £1.348m (similar to amount in 2018/19) for corridors, neighbourhoods and supporting measures and £100k for local transport funding for 2019/20. The Council will also be submitting a bid for further funding for principal road maintenance and for the maintenance of highway structures. The actual amount that will be allocated will depend both on the total amount available and TfL’s assessment of the bids received.

Legal

5.2 All necessary statutory consultation will be undertaken in accordance with the relevant current legislation. All designs will be in accordance with the latest regulations and best practice.

5.3 Under s159 of the GLA Act 1999, financial assistance provided by TfL must be for a purpose which, in TfL’s opinion, is conducive to the provision of safe, integrated, efficient and economic transport facilities or services to, from or within Greater London.

Agenda Item 9 Page 80

6. Appendices and Background Documents

Appendix letter Title

N/A None

Background documents

None

Audit Trail

Version final Date: 26 June 2018 ​ Consultation with other officers

Finance Yes Tony Cooke

Legal Yes David Fellows

Equality Impact Assessment No N/A required?

St Helier, Wrythe and Wandle Valley Committee

12 July 2018

Recommendation Tracker The recommendations tracker allows Committee Members to monitor responses, actions and outcomes against their

recommendations or requests for further action. The tracker is Page 81 updated following each Committee. Once an action has been completed and reported to the Committee, it will be removed from the tracker.

Author(s) and Contact Phone Number(s): Claire Smith 020 8770 5937

Chair of the Committee: Councillor Hanna Zuchowska

Agenda Item 10

Agenda Item 10

Date of Item Recommendation/Action Responsible Response / Outcome Next Meeting Officer or Progress Member Check at Committee 28/01/2016 Item 7 A petition was presented by a pupil on Hitesh A preliminary design for a signal crossing has been 12/07/18 Petitions behalf of Carshalton Boys Sports College Wadher completed and safety audit carried out. to look at the installation of a crossing at Senior the junction of Green Wrythe Lane and Professional A meeting was held with the College to discuss the Waltham Road. Engineer design. The college subsequently engaged with local (Highways) residents via a letter drop for any feedback on the proposed crossing location. However, no feedback was received.

The highways team will now carry out a statutory Page 82 informal consultation over a wider area and with relevant stakeholders to determine the level of support. (anticipated during June/July 2018)

Implementation is anticipated later in the year but will be subject to the outcome of the informal consultation.

08/03/2018 Item 39 A local resident stated that she felt the Hitesh The purpose of the installation of the chicane was to 12/07/18 Highways chicane that had been installed in Wadher reduce the risk of conflicts between users at the Update Stavordale Road has not slowed mopeds Senior bend, rather than deter mopeds. However based on or deterred them. Professional feedback the railings to the chicane have now been Engineer tightened. This can not be tightened any further as it (Highways) will make it difficult for wheelchairs, buggies and cyclists to manoeuvre through it.

08/03/2018 Item 12 A local resident asked that when the Claire Smith The contractor has confirmed that all plants removed 12/07/18 Public plants are swapped over in the hanging Locality Lead from the baskets are reused by them and therefore Question and barrier baskets, could the plants that Officer unfortunately cannot be passed to gardening groups. Time are taken out be passed to Down to Earth Gardening group for them to reuse. 08/03/2018 Item 39 A local resident asked for clarification on Claire Smith An email has been sent to the resident confirming 12/07/2018 Highways the use of pavements for cycleways. The Locality Lead that cycle paths on footpaths either shared or Updates resident also asked which bye-law has Officer segregated are legal as long as correct infrastructure been passed to allow the installation of is in place such as signage and lines. cycle paths on the pavement in Sutton. 08/03/2018 Item 12 A local resident enquired what framework Claire Smith A email was sent to the resident confirming that 12/07/2018 Public would be put in place to prevent residents Locality Lead SDEN have set their prices in accordance with the Question going into fuel poverty following the Officer government sponsored Heat Trust Cost Calculator Time agreement of a contract for 25 years with which is matched to the whole life cycle costs of heat Page 83 Barratt Homes, where heating networks from a gas fired boilers. This method is set out in are unregulated. SDEN's Pricing Policy.

In addition, SDEN is finalising a vulnerable person policy which will be published on the SDEN website, which will address concerns of fuel poverty.

08/03/2018 Item 39 A local resident raised concerns Chris Davies An email was sent to the resident confirming that 12/07/2018 Highways regarding the large amount of potholes Highway Highways inspectors visited Millside and arranged on Millside and Culvers Avenue. Inspector for several potholes to be repaired. There is an area Carshalton approx 180m2 of rough wearing course (top

surface) that will be repaired, as part of the 2018/19

programme. Agenda Item 10

08/03/2018 Item 12 A question was raised by a local resident Mervyn An email was sent to the resident confirming that 12/07/2018 Public as to whether residents with off street Bartlett residents with an address on that street will Agenda Item 10

Question parking for 2 spaces will still be allowed Group automatically be able to apply for one or more time to purchase 3 parking permits. Manager permits if a CPZ is introduced (details are set out in Highways and the Council's approved Parking Strategy), regardless Transport of the off-street parking they may already have.

08/03/2018 Item 12 Residents raised concerns relating to the Principal Barratt David Wilson Homes have confirmed that 12/07/2018 Public level of construction dust/dirt on London Engineer they sweep and clean Hackbridge Road and London Question and Hackbridge Road. Conditions have Highways and Road with a wash truck on a regular basis and will time been placed on the company with a wash Transport ensure regular inspections are undertaken to keep

truck but it is not having much impact. the mud and debris down to a minimum. Residents are concerned about the

health and safety of the local residents during the forthcoming summer months. Page 84 08/03/2018 Item 12 A local resident raised a question Planning In planning terms, local planning authority cannot 12/07/2018 Public regarding the development at Hackbridge Officer restrict the sale of general open market housing or Question and asked if the Council have any restrict sales to particular groups for example time conditions for the developer to offer the overseas investors. houses for sale to local residents and British residents first, rather than sell However, in respect to the 20% of the Felnex them to foreign investors. development which is provided as affordable housing, this is controlled by a legal agreement, which ensures the affordable housing is allocated in the first instance to priority groups with a local connection. ​ The affordable housing on the Felnex development ​​ comprises of shared ownership and intermediate rent and the priority groups comprise persons identified below, with Group 1 being given the highest priority and thereafter in descending order:

Group 1 - persons who live and work in the Borough with housing need;

Group 2 – persons who live in the Borough with housing need;

Group 3 - persons who work in the Borough with housing need.

08/03/2018 Item 12 A local resident raised concerns Olga Gilevska An email was sent to the resident confirming that 12/07/2018 Public regarding the lighting on the towpath at Highway Corbet Close is being redeveloped. On a number of Question the back of Corbett Close. The resident Contracts and occasions lighting along a footpath, which runs to the time reported that there is street lighting, but Delivery Team west of the site, was damaged by the redevelopment Leader very intermittent. This has left the path activities. This was reported to our street lighting without street lights and the normal street contractor who carried out repairs to rectify this. Page 85 lights keep going off and have not been working since Christmas.

Signed: Matt Clubb: Assistant Director ​ Environment, Housing and Regeneration Directorate (Environment Commissioning)

Date: 07/06/18 Agenda Item 10 This page is intentionally left blank

St Helier, Wrythe and Wandle Valley Committee 12 July 2018

Public Realm update table and budget position

This Public Realm report is to provide an update on current schemes and budget position for the Local Committee area

If you wish to propose a new scheme please contact:

Page 87 Claire Smith Lead Locality Officer

020 8770 5937

[email protected]

Author and contact Phone Number:

Claire Smith 020 8770 5937

Chair of the Committee: ​ Agenda Item 11

Councillor Hanna Zuchowska

Agenda Item 11

Section 1 - Progress on current schemes being delivered Project ID Key scheme/ Ward Decision Allocated Comments Anticipated Officer Fund area of date £ completion innovation date

Parks and Open Spaces

SH1718.14 Royston Park - The February 25,253 - Following requests by September Ian C & R Play equipment Wrythe 2018 capital residents to install 2018 Wolstencroft 5,747 - equipment for older children revenue in Royston Park, a consultation was undertaken Total - on Citizen Space (Sutton’s Page 88 31,000 online consultation platform) to determine what type of equipment would best meet the needs of the community.

The consultation was sent to all Councillors, Community Representatives, put on Sutton's Facebook and Twitter accounts and emailed to all Head Teachers in Sutton's schools to cascade this to staff and pupils.

We had 16 responses to the consultation, the top choices were a swing, with 16 people stating that if swings were placed in the park that their children would use it and the other popular choice was parkour equipment.

Following consultation with Ward Councillors, it was decided to install a basket swing, as this would be the more inclusive option and parkour equipment to cater for older children.

Traffic / Transport Page 89

SH/1718.4 Rosehill/ St Helier July 2017 14,250 Design and installation of August 2018 Hitesh Wadher LTF Rosehill Avenue an extension to the one - Extension of way system. one way system The extension of the one way system has been completed. However, the old signage needs to be removed and new signage installed - this has been passed to the contractors.

Agenda Item 11

Agenda Item 11

Community

SH/1819.2 Festive Lights All Wards June 2018 25,706 Festive lights to be installed Installation Heather Evans C to R in the following locations: Date: Wrythe Green Road, 10 November ​ units (to include lamp 2018 ​ columns outside the Removal shops on Green Wrythe Date: January Lane by the Grocers and 2019 the Nisa)

Rosehill - 10 units ​ Page 90 Middleton Circle - 10 units ​

Hackbridge - 6 units ​ including pole fixings,

St Helier - 3 x tree lights, ​

Across Committee area - ​ installation and removal of lights and TfL application fee. ​ CURRENT PUBLIC REALM SCHEMES TOTAL 70,956

Totals by Funding £

Public Realm Capital 25,253

Convert Capital to Revenue 25,706

Transport for London 14,250

Public Realm Revenue 5,747

TOTAL 70,956 Page 91

Agenda Item 11

Agenda Item 11

Section 2 - Completed Schemes since the last meeting

Scheme Ward Budget Notes

SH/1718.11 St Helier 1,330 A Community Notice Board has been placed at the corner of Circle Residents Association notice Stavordale Road to enable the Circle Residents Association and other board community groups to inform local residents of events and meetings.

SH/1718.13 St Helier 3,397 The wooden doors have been replaced with metal ones to ensure the

Replacement doors for toilet block provides secure storage. Page 92 Robertsbridge Road toilet block

SH/1718.9 Wandle 2,684 A moped barrier has been installed on Watermead Lane to ensure the Installation of moped barrier- Valley safety of people using this area. There are residential cottages along Watermead Lane Watermead Lane and the mopeds used it as cut through into the park, creating a noise nuisance, often at night. This also posed a risk to families walking this route.

The moped barrier was designed to enable cyclists, mobility scooters and double width buggies to have access to the path, whilst stopping moped users using this road as a cut through to the park, stop noise nuisance to the cottages along Watermead Lane and ensure improved safety for people walking along this route.

SH1819.1 - Hanging Baskets All Wards 12,005 Hanging baskets have now been installed in the following locations: Wrythe Lane columns -11 hanging baskets Wrythe Lane railings - 17 barrier baskets Middleton Circle - 16 barrier baskets Middleton Circle lamp columns-18 hanging baskets Hackbridge Corner lamp columns- 24 hanging baskets Green Wrythe Lane, shops near BP garage - 4 hanging baskets Culvers Avenue - 10 hanging baskets Rosehill Road - 4 hanging baskets Tudor Parade - 11 hanging baskets This has improved the look and feel of the area

Page 93

Agenda Item 11

Agenda Item 11

Section 3 - Unfunded Public Realm Schemes for future consideration

Scheme Ward Project Date Estimated Comments Officer Fund Sponsor/ Proposed Cost Proposer

None

Page 94

Section 4 – Ongoing Revenue Maintenance Commitments

Scheme Date Agreed Length of Commitment Revenue Commitment

SH/1314.1 Outdoor Gym Equipment for St December 2014 10 years £500 Helier Open Space

SH/1718.14 - Play Equipment in Royston February 2018 10 years £1,000 Park

Total £1,500 Page 95

Agenda Item 11

Agenda Item 11

Section 5 – St Helier, The Wrythe and Wandle Valley Local Committee Financial Update

Budget Position Public Realm Transport Direct Total Capital for London Revenue Funding Funding Funding

£ £ £ £

Balance from 2017/18 0 0 15,382 15,382

Allocation for 2018/19 44,368 17, 747 10,000 72,115 Page 96

Budget for the year 2018/19 44,368 17,747 25,382 87,497

Previously allocated to projects in 2018/19 -25,706 0 -12,005 -37,711 ​

Sums Previously Recycled for Completed Schemes 0 0 0 0

Balance to be allocated in 2018/19 18,662 17,747 13,377 49,786

Section 6 – St Helier, The Wandle and The Wrythe Committee Previously Agreed 2018/19 Schemes

Previously Agreed Schemes (2018/19) Public Public Realm Transport for Direct Decision Date Realm Capital London Revenue Capital Converted to Funding Funding Funding Revenue 2018/19 Hanging Baskets £12,005 June 2018 Festive Lights £25,706 June 2018

Page 97

Signed:

Agenda Item 11 Matt Clubb, Assistant Director Environment & Commissioning Date: 11 June 2018 This page is intentionally left blank