DOCSLIB.ORG

Rural Economic Development Pilot Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rural Economic Development Pilot Program Pinelands Rural Economic Development Pilot Program MULLICA RIVER PRESERVATION CORRIDOR IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM Final Report Whiteman &Taintor January 2000 hMW Table of Contents 1. Overview of Strategy ........................................... ~ ...................... 2 2. A Vision for the Mullica River Heritage Corridor ......................... 3 3. Implementation Strategy ........................................................... 4 A. Staff/Organization ................................................................................... 6 B. Planning and Zoning .............................................................................. 10 C. Infrastructure ........................................................................................ 14 D. Marketing .............................................................................................. 24 E. Site-Specific Development ...................................................................... 28 F. Education and Outreach ........................................................................ 30 ~. ~1l1ll1ll;L~ •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••~ ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ~1 Appendix A. Establishing a Monitoring Program ........................... 33 Appendix B. Additional Resources ................................................ 35 A. Publications ........................................................................................... 35 B. Web Sites ............................................................................................... 36 C. Other ..................................................................................................... 37 Appendix. C. Resource Guides ....................................................... 38 1 1. Overview of Strategy Pilot Program Process This strategy is a companion piece to the Tourism Township Applications Accepted Analysis that was prepared earlier this year (March By Pinelands Commission 1999) for the Mullica River Heritage Corridor. 1 Both documents, as well as a Background Report, were + prepared by Whiteman & Taintor as part of the Interviews & Public Pinelands Rural Economic Development Pilot Program. Workshop The Pilot Program was authorized and funded by the New Jersey State Legislature in August 1997. The goal of the Pilot Program is to help rural Pinelands municipalities identify and plan for types of economic Background Report development that are compatible with requirements for land use throughout the Pinelands. The initial Background Report laid the foundation for the analyses that followed by presenting data on key Public Workshop indicators of regional and local socio-economic health such as tax rates, population, educational attainment, home prices, household income, occupational mix, and unemployment. Findings from the data were then Economic Development used in conjunction with information gathered during Strategy community interviews and public meetings to establish directions for economic development strategies. The March 1999 Strategy provided a detailed examination E.D. Committee of local conditions, including area attractions and Meeting tourism data, to generate strategic recommendations for facility and business development, and marketing. These recommendations were then presented to the Implementation Strategy community for comment. This implementation strategy provides detailed plans for the fmal recommendations, including necessary steps, responsibilities, timeframes, and resources. The Public Workshop strategy begins with an overall vision for the Mullica River Heritage Corridor, followed by discussion of specific action items. A separate appendix contains suggestions for monitoring progress, tips on Townships Implement organization and community involvement, and resources for additional information. The Economic Development Strategy defmed the Mullica River Heritage Corridor as stretching from Tuckerton Seaport to Batsto. Based on a review of the tourism product offered by competing destinations (e.g., Cape May, NJ and Bucks County, PA), the Strategy recommended that the Corridor position itself as uncommercialized, untouristy, undeveloped, and uncrowded. Key themes to draw on include the area's maritime history and outstanding natural resources. The villages of New Gretna, Lower Bank, Green Bank, and Sweetwater can serve as centers for visitor services. 1 Note: The strategies for Route 30 in Mullica Township are discussed in separate documents. 2 The following vision statement captures the potential future for the Mullica River Heritage Corridor that might result from full implementation of this strategy. The vision statement reflects community priorities as expressed during the course of the Pilot Program, and is followed by plans for specific actions. 2. A Vision for the Mullica River Heritage Corridor The Mullica River Corridor will become one of the premier sustainably managed eco-tourism destinations in the State of New Jersey and among the top eco-travel destinations along the East Coast. In the future, travelers along the Atlantic Coast will seek to experience the Mullica River along with other notable eco-destinations such as the less developed portions of the Everglades, the Outer Banks of ~.<>rth Carolina, the Eastern Shore of Maryland, . the Delaware Bay, outer Cape Cod, and the Kennebeck River and the Blue Hills in Maine. Each of these areas offers an unspoiled and different perspective on the heritage of the Atlantic Coast. Each offers a view of what the seaboard was like before the megalopolis began. Each is part of the shore route for small boats traveling up and down the coast. The Mullica River - from Batsto to the Bay - offers an equally compelling and interesting story, and an equally tranquil alternative from the urbanization of the coast. The challenge, however, is to both protect the resource and to use it in an intelligent and sustainable way to benefit the economies of the communities along its banks. In many places in the United States, this strategy would be the starting point for creation of a quality environmental travel experience, which would then quickly escalate into a tourism free-for-all as businesses and communities sought to maximize revenues and development potential. The Pinelands stands out as one of the few places in the nation where an environmentally-oriented tourism strategy can be put in motion and controlled. While revenues and profits may not reach the same levels as would occur under more intensive development schemes, the character of the place will be protected, and economic and environmental sustainability ensured over the long term. The Mullica River Heritage Corridor will offer a high-quality, one-of-a-kind experience that establishes an educational and physical gateway to the serenity of the Pinelands. The implementation effort will be led by a long-term, public­ private partnership that will develop and differentiate the Corridor's travel product, ensure long-term environmental health, and build support for state and regional efforts to manage the river and its resources. Among the area's distinguishing features will be: • Creation of a scenic byway linking roads within the Corridor to the Coastal Heritage Trail. The scenic byway will make visitors aware that they are in a special place and allow them to explore the region at their own pace. The installation of boundary signage will be a key first step in delineating and unifying the Corridor. 3 • Related to the byway effort will be the design and implementation of a comprehensive interpretive program involving points of interest from the Great Bay to Batsto. Through attractive and informative wayside exhibits, signs, kiosks, new and revitalized visitor centers, and a Corridor map, visitors will be able to develop an appreciation and understanding of the region's historical and ecological significance. Visitors will also be encouraged to participate in a variety of stewardship activities during their visits or after they return to their homes. These activities will both work to improve the health of the ecosystem and build a long-term constituency of supporters. • Modest levels of infrastructure development and conversion of outmoded or vacant buildings in existing villages will allow for expansion and development of eto-tourism related businesses including restaurants, bed­ and-breakfasts, and guide/outfitting services. In addition to complying with existing requirements for wastewater management, businesses will be encouraged to operate within a comprehensive framework for environmental sustainability, including for' example, installation of efficient heating and cooling systems; recycling of cooking, cleaning, and bath water; development of non-auto-dependent trails; and inclusion of regionally grown food and food products in local restaurant menus. This framework not only serves to protect the environment, but also differentiates businesses in the Corridor from surrounding communities. Where possible, sustainable practices should be visibly demonstrated to the public. A concise brochure will be developed for visitors and others to explain the guiding principles and highlight participating businesses. • New public-private partnerships will coordinate and guide overall development and marketing of the Corridor. They will also provide direct support and advocacy for the enhancement of state park facilities and other regional resources (e.g., Tuckerton Seaport and the Jacques Cousteau Estuary Center). In addition to serving as destination
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Southern Pinelands Natural Heritage Trail Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan
    Southern Pinelands Natural Heritage Trail Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan Task 3: Intrinsic Qualities November 2008 Taintor & Associates, Inc. Whiteman Consulting, Ltd. Paul Daniel Marriott and Associates CONTENTS PART 1: INTRINSIC QUALITIES................................................................................................. 1 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 3 Overview: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Intrinsic Qualities............................................................ 3 2. Natural Quality ........................................................................................................................ 5 Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 5 Environmental History and Context...................................................................................................... 6 Indicators of Significance...................................................................................................................... 7 Significance as a Leader in Environmental Stewardship ................................................................... 17 The Major Natural Resources of the Pinelands and Their Significance............................................. 17 3. Recreational Quality ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of Sewer and Water Supply Alternatives for Pinelands Growth Areas in the Mullica River Basin, Camden County
    AN ASSESSMENT OF SEWER AND WATER SUPPLY ALTERNATIVES FOR PINELANDS GROWTH AREAS IN THE MULLICA RIVER BASIN, CAMDEN COUNTY NEW JERSEY PINELANDS COMMISSION MAY 1988 AN ASSESSMENT OF SEWER AND WATER SUPPLY ALTERNATIVES FOR PINELANDS GROWTH AREAS IN THE MULLICA RIVER BASIN, CAMDEN COUNTY Prepared by the Staff of the New Jersey Pinelands Commission May, 1988 NEW JERSEY PINELANDS COMMISSION P.O. Box 7, New Lisbon, NJ 08064 TABLE OF CONTENTS page Intro.duction ........................................ 1 S;t:lld~ ~JrE!Cl •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 3 Existing Land Use and Land Cover •••••••••••••••••••• 6 Existing Sewer Service ••••••••••••••••••.••••••••••• 11 Estimated Buildout ................................. 12 Water Quality Assessment •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 15 Wetlands and Transitional Areas ••••••••••••••••••••• 24 Threatened and Endangered Species ••••••••••••••••••• 25 Estimates of Stream Flow Characteristics •••••••••••• 27 Hydrologic Budget and Nutrient Loading •••••••••••••• 34 Exi sting Condi tions ................................ 44 Water Supply and Sewage Disposal Alternatives ••••••• 47 Summary of Scenarios and Recommendations •••••••••••• 58 References . 59 INTRODUCTION In February 1987, the Pinelands commission received notice of the Camden County Municipal Utilities Authority's intention to propose a 208 water quality management plan for Chesilhurst Borough, Waterford Township, and Winslow Town­ ship, which was submitted to the Department of Environmental Protection for review and conceptual approval. The proposal recommended the transfer of existing and future sewage flows from Regional Growth Areas located in the three Atlantic Basin municipalities to the Delaware Basin. Information which was subsequently provided to the Commission by the Camden County Municipal Utilities Authority (CCMUA) indi­ cated that the ultimate design flow for this interbasin transfer was 3.6 million gallons per day and 2.75 million gallons per day from the Mullica River Basin and Great Egg Harbor River Basin, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Mullica Township Environmental Resource Inventory
    '!'1-oo'f MULLICA TOWNSHIP ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE INVENTORY Prepared by Catherine F. Werick-Fine President, ERI, INC. Environmental Research Specialists This document was prepared for the Mullica Township Environmental Commission with the aid of a grant from the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Environmental Services 2000 - FORWARD Mullica Township is located in the guide decisions concerning the northeast portion of Atlantic future of Mullica Township. County, in the New Jersey Pinelands. The township has a We want to thank the Mullica total of 55 square miles. It is Township Committee for their bounded on the north by the support in the effort to present Mullica River; on the east by the this data to the people and various City of Egg Harbor; on the south boards that control the fate of by Hamilton Township; and on the Mullica Township. west by the town of Hammonton. Mullica Township is at a crossroad to determine it's future. Its open space is both attractive to developers and residents who cherish its rural character. .- Whether increased development in Mullica is perceived or real it must be acknowledged. The Mullica Township Environmental Commission with the assistance of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) began its compilation of data in July of 1998. The Mullica Township Committee agreed to mach the grant provided by the NJDEP to continue this compilation of environmental data to include historic data throughout the Township. The information presented within ,.- this Environmental and Historic Resource Inventory is intended to GEOGRAPHY THE SCIENCE OF GEOGRAPHY DESCRIBES MAN, LAND AND CLIMATE.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Plan
    Edgewater Park Township Delanco Township Delanco Township Burlington Township Riverside Township COUNTY INVESTMENT AREA MAP COMMUNITY VISION OVERLAY Springfield Township Growth Areas Willingboro Township Metropolitan Core POLICY GOAL 1: Promote growth, development, and redevelopment activities in POLICY GOAL 3: Support and promote the vitality and revitalization of the City suburban and urban communities that contain existing or planned infrastructure, of Camden. Delran Township existing population and employment clusters, and dense settlement patterns. Westampton Township Riverton Borough Priority Growth Investment Area (PGIA) Innovation Hub Palmyra Borough POLICY GOAL 4: Leverage the synergy of educational, business, institutional uses Cinnaminson Township and regional attractions to spur a regional mixed-use hub inEastampton downtown Township Camden. Alternate Growth Investment Area (AGIA) Pennsauken / Route 73 Mount Holly Township Transit Centers Conservation/Preservation Areas Existing Philadelphia Pochack Creek POLICY GOAL 5: Encourage active transit corridors by clustering growth, POLICY GOAL 2: Encourage limited growth, conservation, or preservation development, and a vibrant mix of uses within a walkable distance of transit Proposed Pemberton Township Pennsauken Transit Center activities in areas that do not contain existing or planned infrastructure Moorestown Township stations. 90 supportive of large-scale growth and development, and contain a majority Hainesport Township of resources that are important to the environmental,
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Estuarine Fish Inventory Program: Great Bay-Mullica River: Year Three
    Draft Final Report for Title: Comprehensive Estuarine Fish Inventory Program: Great Bay-Mullica River: Year Three Investigator names and institution: Kenneth W. Able and Thomas M. Grothues, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey 2020 Problem Statement and Needs Assessment: Estuaries are important spawning, nursery, and harvest areas for fish and invertebrates of recreational, commercial, and ecological importance in the temperate waters of the northeastern U. S., including New Jersey (Able and Fahay 1998, 2010a). Our knowledge of the life history and ecology of fishes in estuaries has been improving in recent years, in part, because the information on these topics is in increasing demand by ichthyologists, estuarine ecologists, pollution biologists and resource managers at local, state, federal and international levels (Able 2016). The fishes constitute one of the largest portions of the animal biomass and thus they are important to estuarine ecosystems. Sport and commercial fishermen are also becoming increasingly interested in fish life histories and ecology because they are beginning to play a larger advisory role where fish habitats and fish survival are concerned. This interest is extending to forage fishes. Recently, these audiences have been further broadened by an increasingly informed general public, who are interested in (and alarmed by) the conflicting interests of aesthetic and recreational uses versus negative impacts resulting from human population pressures that bring habitat destruction and direct and indirect (non-point) sources of pollution. Some have estimated that up to 75% of economically important east coast fish populations are to some degree “estuarine dependent”. A focus on estuarine fishes is also especially appropriate, largely because it is while they are in estuaries that they encounter several critical life history “bottlenecks” that can greatly affect survival rates and the resulting abundance of certain populations that we wish to harvest or conserve.
    [Show full text]
  • South Jersey Gas Pipeline Is Defeated!
    April / May 2019 Volume 26 Number 2 Barn Renovation Nears Completion . 3 Raptors of the Pinelands . 4 Life Science Field Training Institute . 6 Pinelands Commission approves the South Jersey Gas Pipeline in February 2017. Pinelands Events . 7 South Jersey Gas Pipeline is Defeated! Explore the by Carleton Montgomery, Executive Director Pinelands! The South Jersey Gas pipeline has been pipeline on the grounds it would send all defeated. This is a huge victory for the its gas to a new power plant at the BL Guided and unguided Pinelands. It is also a potent statement England site on Great Egg Harbor. But river trips, bus tours, about the power of public activism, our collective opposition bought enough hikes, canoe lessons because the most powerful forces in our time (six years) for the BL England owner and more. state pushed to get this pipeline built. to abandon any plans to build that power Those forces included then-governor plant. With no power plant, the basis for Fun for the whole family! Chris Christie, then-Senator Jeff Van allowing the pipeline simply disappeared. Drew, and South Jersey Industries togeth- Book Your Next er with its unions and fellow utilities. There are lessons in the last six years of Adventure Today! struggle. Especially when you consider all The people fighting for the Pinelands the things the Pinelands Commission and were a majority of the public, PPA and our politicians did to push the pipeline Pinelands partner groups - particularly Food & through despite public opposition and Adventures Water Watch, Sierra Club, NJ numerous setbacks. 1005 Atsion Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • Mullica River Basin
    310 MULLICA RIVER BASIN 01409387 MULLICA RIVER AT OUTLET OF ATSION LAKE, AT ATSION, NJ LOCATION.--Lat 39°44'25", long 74°43'36", Burlington County, Hydrologic Unit 02040301, at bridge on U.S. Route 206 in Atsion, at outlet of Atsion Lake, and 0.2 mi upstream from Wesickaman Creek. DRAINAGE AREA.--26.7 mi2. PERIOD OF RECORD.--Water years 1976 to current year. REMARKS.--Total nitrogen (00600) equals the sum of dissolved ammonia plus organic nitrogen (00623), dissolved nitrite plus nitrate nitrogen (00631), and total particulate nitrogen (49570). COOPERATION.--Determination of dissolved ammonia, total ammonia, dissolved nitrite, dissolved orthophosphate, biochemical oxygen demand, total suspended solids, fecal coliform, E. coli, and enterococcus bacteria was performed by the New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services, Public Health and Environmental Laboratories, Environmental and Chemical Laboratory Services. Determination of chlorophyll a was performed by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Freshwater and Biological Monitoring Laboratory. COOPERATIVE NETWORK SITE DESCRIPTOR.--Undeveloped Land Use Indicator, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Watershed Management Area 14. WATER-QUALITY DATA, WATER YEAR OCTOBER 2002 TO SEPTEMBER 2003 UV UV Tur- absorb- absorb- Dis- pH, Specif. Hard- Instan- bidity, ance, ance, Baro- solved water, conduc- ness, taneous water, 254 nm, 280 nm, metric Dis- oxygen, unfltrd tance, Temper- Temper- water, dis- unfltrd wat flt wat flt pres- solved percent field, wat unf ature, ature, unfltrd charge, field, units units sure, oxygen, of sat- std uS/cm air, water, mg/L as Date Time cfs NTU /cm /cm mm Hg mg/L uration units 25 degC deg C deg C CaCO3 (00061) (61028) (50624) (61726) (00025) (00300) (00301) (00400) (00095) (00020) (00010) (00900) NOV 26..
    [Show full text]
  • Mullica River Bridge
    PROJECT Mullica River Bridge Widening of the Garden State Parkway by Tom Fisher, Dave Rue, and Judson Wible, Parsons Brinckerhoff Inc., and Elizabeth Trimpin, New Jersey Turnpike Authority Aerial photo of completed new Mullica River Bridge after traffic shift and before rehabilitation of existing bridge. All Photos: Parsons Brinckerhoff Inc. There’s nothing like a 25-mile detour GSP from Somers Point, Atlantic County in each direction, enabling the off-line plan to make you realize that the to Toms River, Ocean County, N.J. When rehabilitation of the original bridge. Mullica River Bridge is a critical piece completed, the widening program will of infrastructure on the Garden State provide a third travel lane and shoulders The new structure is 1230 ft long Parkway (GSP). If you’re traveling to the for both the northbound and southbound and 56 ft 9 in. wide, providing a final Jersey shore (made more popular by the directions. configuration of three 12-ft-wide TV show of the same name)—or away lanes, a 5-ft-wide inside shoulder, from it due to a hurricane—the Mullica The widening at the Mullica River and a 12-ft-wide outside shoulder. River Bridge is the travel crossing located crossing will be accomplished with the The rehabilitated structure is 877 ft at milepost 49.0 of the GSP. construction of a new six-span concrete 6 in. long, and when finished, will be structure to carry northbound traffic, 61 ft 9 in. wide with three 12-ft-wide The New Jersey Turnpike Authority’s (NJTA) followed by the rehabilitation of the lanes, a 10-ft-wide inside shoulder, “Widening of the Garden State Parkway original 1954 eight-span steel structure and a 12-ft-wide outside shoulder.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Bridge Report
    STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1035 PARKWAY AVENUE P.O. BOX 601 TRENTON, N.J. 08625-0601 JON S. CORZINE 609-530-3535 GOVERNOR KRIS KOLLURI. ESQ. COMMISSIONER August 9,2007 The Honorable Jon S. Corzine Governor State House P.O. Box 001 Trenton, NJ 08625-0001 Dear Governor Corzine: Pursuant to your directive issued August 2, 2007, attached please find the interim report on bridges. The accompanying documents detail the number of bridges located in the state, their jurisdiction of control, structural condition, the date of last inspection and the anticipated date of the next inspection .. Of the 6,434 bridges in New Jersey, including those owned and operated by the State, New Jersey Transit, independent and bi-State authorities, counties and municipalities, there are 736 (11%) that are considered "structurally deficient", These are bridges whose deck, superstructure and/or substructure are deteriorated; however, this does not mean that these bridges are unsafe to travel on. I want to assure you that the safety ofthe motoring public is my highest priority. In fact, under federal regulation, the New Jersey Department of Transportation rigorously inspects the bridges under its jurisdiction a minimum of every two (2) years, or more if necessary. Further, the NJDOT Office of the Inspector General is conducting unscheduled audits and investigations of all movable bridge operational procedures to test for compliance with all aspects of the Movable Bridge Protocol Program. I have asked the Inspector General to conduct similar audits of non-movable bridges as well. In addition, inspections of the seven (7) New Jersey bridges with similar deck truss structures as the bridge in Minneapolis have been ordered for immediate inspection based upon the Federal Highway Administration directive.
    [Show full text]
  • Water for Philadelphia O Arthur M
    In the midst of Philadelphia’s water shortages and epidemics, Joseph Wharton (below) looked to New Jersey’s Pine Barrens. Arthur M. Holst, Ph.D. Philadelphia Water Department Joseph Wharton and the Pine Barrens Business and Government Affairs Manager he city of Philadelphia plays a significant part in the particular, the Schuylkill and Delaware Rivers became extremely history of water management and treatment in the United polluted during the time period. The Schuylkill River is of main States. The city made numerous advancements early on in concern, as the Philadelphia Water Department determined early on T 1 the nineteenth century in providing water to the public. that the Delaware River was not suitable for drinking water. New technologies were continually being developed, Due to upstream mining, industrial pollution caused and Philadelphia became famous for having the serious problems in the Schuylkill River. Factories nation’s first municipal water system. However, were dumping their waste directly into this suffered severely in the beginning, Philadelphia’s streams and rivers, and as the experiencing many downfalls and failures. Early population upstream increased, more and more machines were dangerous—even deadly—and human and animal waste was being dumped water sources became severely polluted. into the river. Similarly, towns like Reading Despite close access to both the Schuylkill and Pottsville dumped their waste directly and Delaware Rivers, Philadelphia faced a into the Schuylkill River and, though many water shortage crisis. miles upstream, without treatment, it As the city of Philadelphia looked for remained and festered in the water.2 solutions, so did individuals. Joseph Wharton In Philadelphia during the 1790s, a yellow is one of these individuals who saw potential fever epidemic killed approximately twenty business advantages in the situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Morone Saxatilis
    17 6 Abstract—Distribution, movements, Distribution, movements, and habitat use and habitat use of small (<46 cm, juveniles and individuals of unknown of small striped bass (Morone saxatilis) maturity) striped bass (Morone saxa- tilis) were investigated with multiple across multiple spatial scales techniques and at multiple spatial scales (surveys and tag-recapture in Kenneth W. Able1 the estuary and ocean, and telemetry 1 in the estuary) over multiple years to Thomas M. Grothues determine the frequency and dura- Jason T. Turnure1 tion of use of non-natal estuaries. 2* These unique comparisons suggest, Donald M. Byrne at least in New Jersey, that smaller Paul Clerkin1 individuals (<20 cm) may disperse E-mail address for contact author: [email protected] from natal estuaries and arrive in 1 non-natal estuaries early in life and Rutgers University Marine Field Station take up residence for several years. 800 c/o 132 Great Bay Blvd. During this period of estuarine resi- Tuckerton, New Jersey 08087 dence, individuals spend all seasons 2 New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection primarily in the low salinity portions Nacote Creek Research Station of the estuary. At larger sizes, they P.O. Box 418 then leave these non-natal estuaries Port Republic, New Jersey 08241 to begin coastal migrations with those * Posthumous individuals from nurseries in natal estuaries. These composite observa- tions of frequency and duration of habitat use indicate that non-natal estuaries may provide important habitat for a portion of the striped bass population. A full understanding of the distribu- juveniles remain in estuaries for the tion, movements, and habitat use of first few years of life before leaving juvenile and other subadult striped to join the coastal migration and may bass (Morone saxatilis) is central to stay longer, if they are natal estuarine deciphering the role, impacts, and residents (Secor 1999; Ashley et al., management of this abundant and 2000; Secor and Piccoli, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Raptors and Waterbirds on the Great Egg Harbor River
    RAPTORS AND WATERBIRDS ON THE GREAT EGG HARBOR RIVER ATLANTIC COUNTY, NJ WINTER, 2007 - 2008 The Fifth Field Season of a Systematic Study of an Important Avian Wintering Area including Key Comparisons to the MULLICA RIVER and an investigation of SPRING MIGRATION on the Great Egg Harbor River Submitted to: The Great Egg Harbor Watershed Association By Clay Sutton and James Dowdell July 30, 2008 Clay and Pat Sutton LLC 129 Bucks Avenue Cape May Court House, NJ 08210 609-465-3397 [email protected] On the cover: Obviously not a raptor or waterbird, this Orange-crowned Warbler was none-the-less a very good find on January 16, 2008, at Jeffer’s Landing. Wintering Orange-crowned Warblers are rare in New Jersey, and particularly so away from the Cape May Point vicinity. (Photo by Clay Sutton) The Great Egg Harbor Watershed Association OFFICERS Fred Akers - Administrator Julie Akers P.O. Box 395 President Newtonville, NJ 08346 Ed Curry 856-697-6114 Vice President [email protected] Dick Colby Treasurer Lynn Maun Secretary & The water birds and raptors of the Great Egg Harbor River Coordinator Watershed are one of the many “Outstandingly Remarkable TRUSTEES Resource Values” that enabled designation of the river into the Steve Eisenhauer National Wild and Scenic Rivers System in 1992. This Elmer Ripley Sarah Summerville continuing study provides information on the status and trends Jamie Cromartie of water birds and raptors in the river corridor to assure their Pat Sprigman long-term protection and promote the importance of wild places Clark Sprigman in the American landscape, and especially here in South Jersey.
    [Show full text]