DOCSLIB.ORG

Planning Strategies Age of Active Citizenship in an Age of Active Citizenship

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Planning Strategies in an Age of Active Citizenship Active Age of in an Planning Strategies Beitske Boonstra, MSc Planning Strategies in an Planning Strategies Age of Active Citizenship in an Age of Active Citizenship Civic initiatives in spatial development are on the rise. Beitske Boonstra works A Post-structuralist Agenda for Self-organization They emerge from civil society spontaneously and are as research scientist at in Spatial Planning unpredictable, dynamic, and multiplicit. Therefore, TNO Strategy & Policy for they are often at odds with the inclusionary and Environmental Planning. disciplinary confines of participatory planning and She holds a Master existing planning frameworks. Planning strategies that degree in Urbanism answer to the dynamics of civic initiatives, meeting the (Delft University of complexity of an age of active citizenship, have so far Technology) (2005) and been seriously underdeveloped. Based on empirical defends her PhD in Urban studies of civic initiatives in Denmark, the Netherlands and Regional Planning and England, and a theoretical hybrid of complexity (Utrecht University) in theory (self-organization), actor-network theory 2015. At TNO her research (translation), and assemblage theory (individuation), projects are positioned on this book argues toward a spatial planning that does the crossovers between fit the age of active citizenship. A spatial planning that spatial planning, economic focusses on conditions that open up, on navigation, development, public and on creating consistency between a redundancy administration, new of spatial initiatives. And most importantly, the book technologies and process argues toward a flat ontology of planning, in which innovation. She works there are no a priori differences between the intentions under commission of local, and performed behavior of planning actors – including provincial and national citizens, entrepreneurs, governments, and many others. governments, and she is participant and initiator of national and international Beitske Boonstra, MSc research consortia. Beitske is frequent speaker on conferences and (guest) lecturer at various Dutch universities. Planning Strategies in an Age of Active Citizenship A Post-structuralist Agenda for Self-organization in Spatial Planning Planningsstrategieën in een tijd van actief burgerschap Een poststructuralistische agenda voor zelforganisatie in ruimtelijke planning (met samenvatting in het Nederlands) Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit Utrecht op gezag van rector magnificus prof. dr. G.J. van der Zwaan, ingevolge het besluit van het college voor promoties te verdediging op vrijdag 11 november 2015 des middags te 12.45 uur door Beitske Boonstra geboren op 29 september 1981 te Velsen Promotoren: Prof. dr. ir. L. Boelens Prof. dr. T.J.M. Spit Planning Strategies in an Age of Active Citizenship A POST-STRUCTURALIST AGENDA FOR SELF-ORGANIZATION IN SPATIAL PLANNING Beitske Boonstra, MSc PhD Series InPlanning, book 7 © Beitske Boonstra, October 2015 The research presented in this dissertation was conducted under supervision of Utrecht University and University of Ghent. The research was partly funded by TNO (Netherlands Organisation of Applied Scientific Research) as part of the research programs “Stad als Systeem” and “ERP Zelfredzaamheid”, and by the Dutch research program “Knowledge for Climate, Climate Proof Cities (Theme 4)”, funded by the Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment. This publication has been made possible with contributions from Utrecht University, TNO Strategy & Policy and TNO Smart Cities. ISBN e-book 978-94-91937-15-6 Internal and cover design André Diepgrond (In Ontwerp, Assen) Photo cover Hans Gerritsen, Scapino Ballet Rotterdam, “Pearl” Digital access InPlanning Technical Team InPlanning Editor in Chief Gert de Roo PhD Series InPlanning Published by InPlanning Oude Kijk in ’t Jatstraat 6, 9712 EG Groningen, The Netherlands [email protected] www.inplanning.eu InPlanning is legally registered as cooperative under KvK 58997121 In Planning is the Platform supporting AESOP, the Association of European Schools of Planning, for sharing information on spatial planning. The InPlanning PhD Series supports the publication and distribution of PhD theses produced within Schools of Planning. The InPlanning PhD Series is part of the InPlanning portfolio of books, journals, posters, videos, documentaries and other information carriers. The InPlan- ning PhD Series is available on the InPlanning App for tablets (iOS and Android) and via www.inplanning.eu. This work is intellectual property and subject to copyright. All rights reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the ‘Auteurswet’ (Copyright Law) of the 23th of September 1912, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from InPlanning. Violations are liable to prosecution under Dutch Law. To do TABLE OF CONTENTS 6 Table of contents Summary 9 Samenvatting 15 1 The Challenge of Civic Initiatives in Spatial Planning 23 1.1 Wanted! Active and Involved Citizens 24 1.2 A Short History of Participatory Planning 30 1.3 An Inclusionary Practice 38 1.4 Research Question and Objectives 44 2 The Emergence of Complexity 49 2.1 Turning to Complexity 50 2.2 Complexity in Governance and Planning 55 2.3 Divergent Readings of Complexity: Romantic and Baroque 59 2.4 Divergent Understandings of Complex Adaptive Systems 63 2.5 The Road to take Concerning Civic Initiatives 73 3 A Post-Structuralist Understanding of Self-Organization 77 3.1 A Post-structuralist Ontology 78 3.2 Post-structuralist Self-Organization 84 3.3 Post-structuralist Perspectives on Space, Place, and Planning 99 4 A Diagram of Processes of Becoming 111 4.1 Four Forms of Behavior in Processes of Becoming 112 4.2 Translation in Three Intentionalities 125 5 The Empirical Perspective: Introduction to the Case Studies 133 5.1 Multiple Case Study Research 134 5.2 Tracing the Individual Cases 138 5.3 Plotting the Traces on the Diagram 141 5.4 Formulating Answers to the Research Questions 146 6 A Practice of Do-It-Yourself, Together: The Case of Co-housing, Denmark 151 6.1 The Netherlands and Denmark: A Different Context for Co-housing 154 6.2 Three Co-housing Projects 163 6.3 Conclusions 183 TABLE OF CONTENTS 7 7 A Legal Framework for Collective Action: The Case of Business Improvement Districts, England 193 7.1 BIDs: A Trajectory with Many Ambiguities 195 7.2 An English Referential Case Study 207 7.3 The BIDs of Birmingham 215 7.4 Conclusions 257 8 Policy to Put Citizens in the Lead: The Case of Almere, the Netherlands 277 8.1 A Short History of the Planning and Planning Ideas of Almere 279 8.2 Four Civic Initiatives 288 8.3 Conclusions 316 9 Conclusions: Planning Strategies that Fit an Age of Active Citizenship 331 9.1 Conclusion 1: Conditions that “Open Up” 335 9.2 Conclusion 2: The Need for Navigators 342 9.3 Conclusion 3: The Flat Ontology of Planning Strategy 352 9.4 Conclusion 4: The Art of Creating Consistency 362 9.5 The Great Beyond: Critical Reflections and a Flight Forward 370 Bibliography 375 Acknowledgements 413 About the author 417 8 SUMMARY 9 SUMMARY Civic initiatives in spatial development are on the rise. Whereas for a long time they were just a fringe movement, sometimes even a stand in the way of planned urban development, civic initiatives today are increasingly seen as valuable strategies for urban development. Chapter 1 illuminates the motivation for this research on civic initiatives. It describes how many European governments, including the Dutch, speak eagerly of “active citizenship”. They wish for citizens to be involved in public policy processes and in “civic initiatives.” So far, spatial planning mostly focused on strategies for citizen involvement through participatory planning. In participatory planning, citizens can exert influence on goals set by governmental agencies, through procedures and frameworks that are set by the same governments and planners. This results in disciplinary processes of thematic, procedural, and geographical inclusion. Civic initiatives differ from this prevailing partici- patory practice. They are issue-oriented projects serving a specific but dynamic community interest, which are often not at all related to any ongoing public policy. Civic initiatives can be undertaken by residents, entrepreneurs, artists, etc., in loose and informal structures, and differ fundamentally from initiatives in the private (individual), public and business sphere. They are spontaneous, dynamic, multiplicit and hard to fit within any disciplinary constraints. Civic initiatives are thus often at odds with participatory planning. Other planning approaches, such as framework planning or participatory budgeting, or planning as close as possible to citizens’ life world, seem to be in line with the ideas of active citizenship, but nonetheless stay within the same premise of a disciplinary role of government and planners. Together with an ongoing diversification in society, decentralization, dispersion of power, and increasing resource interdependency (e.g. land, property, knowledge, competences, capital, authority), the emerging practice of civic initiatives in spatial development, therefore poses serious challenges to contemporary spatial planners. Planning strategies that answer to the dynamics of civic initiatives, meeting the complexity of an age of active citizenship, have so
Recommended publications
  • The Committee of the Regions and the Danish Presidency of the Council of the European Union 01 Editorial by the President of the Committee of the Regions 3

    The Committee of the Regions and the Danish Presidency of the Council of the European Union 01 Editorial by the President of the Committee of the Regions 3

    EUROPEAN UNION Committee of the Regions The Committee of the Regions and the Danish Presidency of the Council of the European Union 01 Editorial by the President of the Committee of the Regions 3 02 Editorial by the Danish Minister for European Aff airs 4 03 Why a Committee of the Regions? 6 Building bridges between the local, the regional and 04 the global - Danish Members at work 9 05 Danish Delegation to the Committee of the Regions 12 06 The decentralised Danish authority model 17 EU policy is also domestic policy 07 - Chairmen of Local Government Denmark and Danish Regions 20 08 EU-funded projects in Denmark 22 09 The 5th European Summit of Regions and Cities 26 10 Calendar of events 28 11 Contacts 30 EUROPEAN UNION Committee of the Regions Editorial by the President of 01 the Committee of the Regions Meeting the challenges together We have already had a taste of Danish culture via NOMA, recognised as the best restaurant in the world for two years running by the UK’s Restaurants magazine for putting Nordic cuisine back on the map. Though merely whetting our appetites, this taster has confi rmed Denmark’s infl uential contribution to our continent’s cultural wealth. Happily, Denmark’s contribution to the European Union is far more extensive and will, undoubtedly, be in the spotlight throughout the fi rst half of 2012! A modern state, where European and international sea routes converge, Denmark has frequently drawn on its talents and fl ourishing economy to make its own, distinctive mark. It is in tune with the priorities for 2020: competitiveness, social inclusion and the need for ecologically sustainable change.
  • Annex I - “Description of Work”

    Annex I - “Description of Work”

    SEVENTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME THEME Coordination of National and Regional Activities (ERA-NET scheme) Grant agreement for: Coordination Action Annex I - “Description of Work” Project acronym: ERNEST Project full title: European Research NEtwork on Sustainable Tourism Grant agreement no.: (same as proposal no) Date of preparation of Annex I (latest version): February 2008 Date of approval of Annex I by Commission: (to be completed by Commission) ERNEST PROJECT NUMBER 219438 Drafting Date: February 2008 Contents page PART A: __________________________________________________________________ 3 A1: Budget breakdown form (copy of A3.2 form of the GPFs). _________________________ 3 A2: Project summary form (copy of A1 form of the GPFs).____________________________ 3 PART B___________________________________________________________________ 5 B1. Concept and objectives, contribution to the coordination of high quality research, quality and effectiveness of the coordination mechanism and associated work plan ______________ 5 B 1.1 Concept and project objective(s) _________________________________________________ 5 B 1.2 Contribution to the coordination of high quality research _______________________ 18 B 1.3 Quality and effectiveness of the coordination mechanisms and associated work plan _ 19 B 1.3.1 Timing of work packages and their components:_________________________________ 21 Work package list / overview: ________________________________________________________ 22 List of Deliverables _________________________________________________________________
  • Project and Partners in Brief

    Project and Partners in Brief

    SUSCOD Project and partners in brief European Union European Regional Development Fund In this folder you will find a brief overview of the SUSCOD project. Each of the partners presents itself and their activities within the project. If you are interested in following SUSCOD please visit our website: www.SUSCOD.eu Get connected About SUSCOD Gertjan Nederbragt, project manager: Kim Uittenbosch: [email protected] [email protected] SUSCOD aims to make a step change in the application of integrated coastal zone management (ICZM). In doing so coastal potentials can be utilised to full advantage and broader support for coastal management measures can be secured. The North Sea Region coastal area is an area with high value SUSCOD brings together partners who want to realise this assets, where the pressure for competing user functions is through a well coordinated transnational team approach. being strongly felt. It faces the anticipated impacts of climate They all have eroding coasts. They share the urgent need change. Precautionary measures are required to guarantee to act proactively because of safety reasons and also the safety for inhabitants and safeguard its values. The challenge ambition to find practical solutions. Leading forces can be is to find positive solutions that also ensure fully integrated characterised as the wish for sustainable solutions and the social, economic and environmental development. improvement of spatial quality. 3 | SUSCOD Project and partners in brief Project objectives Central in SUSCOD is the development of a practical tool: the ICZM-assistant, its introduction to potential users and 1 Exchange knowledge and expertise its demonstrated value at test locations.
  • Tourism Mobility in the Suburbs

    Tourism Mobility in the Suburbs

    Tourism Mobility in the suburbs A Case Study of Kongens Lyngby Written by: Susanne Neander Duus Master in Tourism Student nr. 20150817 10th semester Supervisor: Carina Ren Aalborg University Hand in date: 31-07-2017 Denmark 1 Abstract Tourism mobility has become a new travelling behavior, which results from our access to digital devices and urge for being self reliant when travelling. We, no longer need the traditional touristic elements. This new behavior has especially transformed our travel habits and the travelling industry is the one industry that have taken the digital age to heart. This turn in our mobility is discussed through a historic development where the perspective for the case of Lyngby are being discussed. The discussion leads to the case study of Lyngby. A suburb to Copenhagen, which are developing the city through knowledge. However, as a resident in the city I have wondered why tourism, has no part in the City. I have found several contradictions, such as the tourism office that closes, and a tourist strategy that is being created at the same time, based on a vague report, furthermore the neglection of tourism, which is also made on vague grounds. A statement from the municipality awaked my curiosity; “the fact is, that we don't want tourism”. However as an employee of the city's ​ ​ hotel, I saw many tourists and their need for touristic products. There seem to be a misconception of tourism among the city representants and also a lack of acknowledgement for how tourism can contribute to the local stakeholders, residents and the community.
  • A Digital Standard Towards a Digital Bureaucracy

    A Digital Standard Towards a Digital Bureaucracy

    01/2019 cView A digital standard Towards a digital bureaucracy In this issue Public authorities on the way to a digital bureaucracy Rethink your approach – software alone won’t cut it From paper to mission critical systems using standard software Digital bureaucracy Towards a digital bureaucracy Public authorities’ work procedures are alike. That’s called bureaucracy. It is commonly known that public autho- The public sector itself, then, dictates a became clear that even though bureaucracy rities regard themselves as being different market development which leaves providers prevails, the transition from paper-based to each other. That’s why they choose with no incentive to create sector-wide solu- to digital bureaucracy has far reaching individual IT systems. However, this entails tions. Additionally, there is no competition consequences. great costs and operational challenges as between public authorities. developing large, new IT systems often go cBrain’s model, method and F2 software awry – both in the public and the private The competition between private compani- encourage the conversion of analogue sector. Additionally, maintenance and es creates fertile soil for innovation and new bureaucracy to a digital bureaucracy, further development of individual solutions products, including better and cheaper stan- which has proven a successful approach often mean significant costs and risks. dard systems which provide the customers to digitisation. It is also a demanding with competitive advantages and which can approach, however: it requires mainly that The private sector has taken the consquen- be used across the sector. management is involved, but the organi- ce of this a long time ago. IT providers sation is also required to have an overview have specialized and offer a great number cBrain’s standard system F2 challenges the of its business processes.
  • Kemisk Grundvandskortlægning

    Kemisk Grundvandskortlægning

    DANMARKS OG GRØNLANDS GEOLOGISKE UNDERSØGELSE RAPPORT 2020/11 Danish review on advances in assessing: N retention in the subsurface in relation to future targeted N-regulation of agriculture November 2019 Birgitte Hansen, Anders Vest Christiansen, Tommy Dalgaard, Flemming Jørgensen, Bo V. Iversen, Jakob Juul Larsen, Charlotte Kjærgaard, Brian H. Jacobsen, Esben Auken, Anker Lajer Højberg & Stefan Schaper Geological survey of Øster Voldgade 10 GEUS is a research and advisory Denmark and Greenland (GEUS) DK-1350 Copenhagen K institution in the Danish Ministry GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF DENMARK AND GREENLAND Denmark of Climate, Energy and Utilities DANISH MINISTRY OF CLIMATE, ENERGY AND UTILITIES DANMARKS OG GRØNLANDS GEOLOGISKE UNDERSØGELSE RAPPORT 2020/11 Danish review on advances in assessing: N retention in the subsurface in relation to future targeted N-regulation of agriculture November 2019 Birgitte Hansen, Anders Vest Christiansen, Tommy Dalgaard, Flemming Jørgensen, Bo V. Iversen, Jakob Juul Larsen, Charlotte Kjærgaard, Brian H. Jacobsen, Esben Auken, Anker Lajer Højberg & Stefan Schaper GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF DENMARK AND GREENLAND DANISH MINISTRY OF CLIMATE, ENERGY AND UTILITIES 2 G E U S DE NATIONALE GEOLOGISKE UNDERSØGELSER FOR DANMARK OG GRØNLAND KLIMA- OG ENERGIMINISTERIET 3 Affiliation of authors Birgitte Hansen: GEUS Anders Vest Christiansen: Department of Geosciences, AU Tommy Dalgaard: Department of Agroecology, AU Flemming Jørgensen: Central Denmark Region Bo V. Iversen: Department of Agroecology, AU Jakob Juul Larsen: Department of Engineering, AU Charlotte Kjærgaard: SEGES, Landbrug og Fødevare Brian H. Jacobsen: Department of Food and Resource Economics, KU Esben Auken: Department of Geosciences, AU Anker Lajer Højberg: GEUS Stefan Schaper: Department of Management, BSS, AU 4 G E U S Content 1.
  • Application for the Landscape Award of the Council of Europe 2019

    Application for the Landscape Award of the Council of Europe 2019

    Application for the Landscape Award of the Council of Europe 2019 Landscape futures -Visions and plans for the countryside ‘Landscape Futures’ is the name of an action research programme carried out in 2013-18 with the aim to place the future of rural landscapes on the multidisciplinary agenda and to renew Danish countryside planning. Most of the participating landscape planning projects were completed in 2016 but many - as the overall programme – continued and are still ‘active’ in terms of actions taken. The programme was organized as a partnership between three Danish universities (Aalborg University, University of Southern Denmark, and University of Copenhagen), Aarhus School of Architecture, the National Agricultural Advisory Service, Danish Outdoor Council, Danish Hunters Association, and 11 municipalities. Twelve concrete ‘real- life’ planning projects owned by eleven municipalities and the Danish Hunters Association constitute the programme’s laboratory. Insights and solutions gained from these very different projects represent the most important outcomes of the programme. In addition, a number of events have been organized by the programme including ten public lectures on ‘European Landscapes in transition’, seven thematic seminars, an international conference in cooperation with Uniscape, a national conference and a museum exhibition. The main results of the programme are published in the Danish book, ‘Landscape Futures – visions and plans for the countryside’ (Bogværket, February 2019). Additionally, a number of other publications draw on the programme including ‘European Landscape in Transition – implications for policy and planning’ published by Cambridge University Press 2018. The twelve projects have affected protection, management, and enhancements of the landscapes in question and most of them have had clear impacts on municipal planning and landscape management.
  • 6Th International UNESCO Conference on Global Geoparks 2014 ABSTRACTS

    6Th International UNESCO Conference on Global Geoparks 2014 ABSTRACTS

    6th International UNESCO Conference on Global Geoparks 2014 ABSTRACTS Global Geoparks Network 2014 September 19–22, 2014 STONEHAMMER GEOPARK, TRADE AND CONVENTION CENTRE, SAINT JOHN, NEW BRUNSWICK The Global Geopark Network (GGN), assisted by UNESCO comprised 100 geoparks at the start of the meeting, located in Eu- rope, Asia, North and South America. As the only member of the GGN in North America, Stonehammer Geopark was pleased to host the first international meeting of network outside of Europe and Asia. Previous meetings had been in China (2004), The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (2006), Germany (2008); Malaysia (2010) and Japan (2012). On the last day of the meeting Tumbler Ridge Geopark in British Columbia was admitted to the Global Network, along with ten other new geoparks, bringing the global total to 111 global geoparks, and now including Africa. Tumbler Ridge Geopark is the second Canadian member and second North American Global Geopark. The meeting, which celebrated the 10th anniversary of the GGN, was attended by almost 500 delegates from more than 30 countries. Global Geoparks are about more than just rocks. While a Global Geopark must have exceptional geological heritage it includes sites with interesting archaeology, wildlife and habitats, history, folklore and culture, all of which are intricately linked with the underlying geology. In the following pages, we are pleased to publish the abstracts of oral and poster presen- tations from the meeting, which were divided into seven themes: (1) Geoparks and sustainable use of natural resources; (2) Engaging Communities; (3) Education and Interpretation in Geoparks; (4) Aspiring Geoparks; (5) Mature Geoparks; (6) UNESCO Collaboration; and (7) Intangible Cultural Heritage.
  • Workindenmark

    Workindenmark

    WELCOME TO DENMARK 1 WELCOME TO DENMARK USEFUL INFORMATION WHICH WILL MAKE IT EASIER FOR YOU TO SETTLE INTO YOUR PROFESSIONAL AND PRIVATE LIFE IN DENMARK 2 WELCOME TO DENMARK We are pleased that you have chosen to settle in Denmark. Denmark has a lot to offer – a good work-life balance, excellent working conditions based on team- work and consensus in a flat management structure and free welfare. People living in Denmark are said to be the happiest people in the world. Moving to a new country is automatically associated with surprises – both good and bad. Many questions arise – do I need a work permit, how does my partner find a job, what about social security, registration, bank account, tax + many more questions. The purpose of this welcome brochure is to answer some of these questions and to help you get started on your new life in Denmark. If you have questions – do not hesitate to contact us. We are here to help you. Once again, Welcome – we hope you will enjoy living in Denmark. Workindenmark THE EUROPEAN UNION The European Social Fund Investing in your future Welcome to Denmark is published by Workindenmark – part of Danish Agency for Labour Market and Recruitment, Ministry of Employment, July 2020 Editor: Kirstine Lindved, Workindenmark Graphic design: Creative United Photos: Getty Images, Workindenmark, Danløn and Skattestyrelsen Print: Rosendahls A/S Welcome to Denmark 3 CONTENTS Denmark Life in Denmark Welcome to Denmark 2 Social Security and Sickness Benefits 40 Denmark – Country and People 6 Health Insurance and Sickness Benefits
  • A Case Study of Fri Og Fro in Odsherred Municipality

    A Case Study of Fri Og Fro in Odsherred Municipality

    The role of ecovillages for sustainable rural development: A case study of Fri og Fro in Odsherred municipality Interdisciplinary Land Use and Natural Resource Management 2021 University of Copenhagen Paper by: Ana Sohler Sánchez, Gaia Stopponi, Janette Mikaela Kotivirta, Michela Francesconi, Noelia Pamela Ordonez, Timothy Fritz Bender Supervisors: Frauke Tom H. Mennes and Torben Birch-Thomsen Handed in: 06/04/2021 1 Abstract This study aims at understanding how the ecovillage Fri og Fro (FoF) contributes with its practices and community-led initiatives to sustainable development in the Egebjerg peninsula and more broadly in Odsherred municipality, in Denmark. For the purpose of this research, we conceptualize the ecovillage as a green niche, which can promote socio-political and physical infrastructures that enable sustainable initiatives and behaviours. We, therefore, identify three different pathways as the framework through which these initiatives can be propagated into a broader context: replication, scaling up and translation. The data was mainly collected on a ten-day fieldwork where various qualitative and quantitative methods were applied. Our findings reveal a substantial contribution of FoF at the local level, inspiring the construction of a new ecovillage in the area and being a pioneer for several sustainable community-led initiatives in the Egebjerg peninsula. However, at the municipal level, the contributions remain limited. Key words: ecovillage, sustainable practices, regional sustainable development, grassroots innovations, Denmark Acknowledgments We would like to give our sincere thanks to everyone who made this fieldwork possible and who have been involved in the process. We highly appreciated the inputs and efforts of lecturers from University of Copenhagen and Roskilde University.
  • 6 Employment 15 7 Education 19 8 Civic Engagement 23 9 Conclusion 26 List of References 27

    6 Employment 15 7 Education 19 8 Civic Engagement 23 9 Conclusion 26 List of References 27

    Roskilde University Working Paper on public policies in relation to solidarity and spatial cohesion/divide Denmark Eschweiler, Jennifer; Hulgård, Lars; Nielsen, Louise Villadsen Publication date: 2018 Document Version Other version Citation for published version (APA): Eschweiler, J., Hulgård, L., & Nielsen, L. V. (2018). Working Paper on public policies in relation to solidarity and spatial cohesion/divide: Denmark. SOLIDUS. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain. • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 01. Oct. 2021 National Background Paper “Denmark” Working Paper on public policies in relation to solidarity and spatial cohesion/divide WP2 Authors: Louise Villadsen Nielsen, Lars Hulgård & Jennifer Eschweiler, Roskilde University, Dissemination level: Confidential, only for members of the consortium
  • Population and Elections.Docx (X:100.0%, Y:100.0%) Created by Grafikhuset Publi PDF

    Population and Elections.Docx (X:100.0%, Y:100.0%) Created by Grafikhuset Publi PDF

    Microsoft Word − 01 Population and elections.docx (X:100.0%, Y:100.0%) Created by Grafikhuset Publi PDF. Population and elections Population and population forecasts Immigrants and their descendants Births Deaths and life expectancy Households, families and children Marriages and divorces Migrations Names Elections Microsoft Word − 01 Population and elections.docx (X:100.0%, Y:100.0%) Created by Grafikhuset Publi PDF. Population and elections Population and population forecasts Population size Figure 1 Since the early 1970s, Denmark has had a population of more than 5 million inhabit- Population ants. The size of the population has seen a slow, but steady increase since 1970, and on 1 January 2017 it was 5.7 million people. However, during the early 1980s, the Million persons 5,8 population fell due to reductions in the number of births. 5,7 5,6 Women are in the majority 5,5 Though more boys than girls are born every year, women comprise slightly more 5,4 than half of the Danish population (50.2 per cent). This is because of higher mortali- 5,3 ty rates among men. There are more men than women in all age groups up to the late 5,2 50s, except for the 41-year-olds, but women take over in all subsequent age groups. 5,1 The age group 100 and older comprises more than six times as many women as men. 5,0 77 82 87 92 97 02 07 12 17 More births than deaths www.statbank.dk/hisb3 Population developments depend on four components: live births, deaths, immigra- tion, and emigration.