Electronic Music

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Electronic Music View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University) Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2018 Rethinking Interaction: Identity and Agency in the Performance of “Interactive” Electronic Music Jacob A. Kopcienski Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Part of the Musicology Commons, and the Other Music Commons Recommended Citation Kopcienski, Jacob A., "Rethinking Interaction: Identity and Agency in the Performance of “Interactive” Electronic Music" (2018). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 7493. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/7493 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Rethinking Interaction: Identity and Agency in the Performance of “Interactive” Electronic Music Jacob A. Kopcienski Thesis submitted To the College of Creative Arts at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Musicology Travis D. Stimeling, Ph. D., Chair Evan MacCarthy, Ph.D. David Taddie, Ph.D. Joel Diegert School of Music Morgantown, West Virginia 2018 Key Words: Music, Interactive, Electronic, Computer, Identity, Agency Abstract Rethinking Interaction: Identity and Agency in the Performance of “Interactive” Electronic Music Jacob Kopcienski This document investigates interaction between human performers and various interactive technologies in the performance of interactive electronic and computer music. Specifically, it observes how the identity and agency of the interactive technology is experienced and perceived by the human performer. First, a close examination of George Lewis’ creation of and performance with his own historic interactive electronic and computer works reveals his disposition of interaction as improvisation. This disposition is contextualized within then contemporary social and political issues related to African American experimental musicians as well as an emerging culture of electronic and computer musicians concerned with interactivity. Second, an auto-ethnographic study reveals a contemporary performers perspective via the author’s own direct interactive experience with electronic and computer systems. These experiences were documented and analyzed using Actor Network Theory, Critical Technical Practice, theories of Embodiment and Embodied Cognition, Lewis’s conceptions of improvisation, as well as Tracy McMullen’s theory of the Improvisative. Analyses from both studies revealed that when and how performers chose to “other” interactive technologies significantly influenced their actions. The implications of this are discussed in terms of identity formation both within performances of interactive electronic music and interactive technologies generally. iii Acknowledgements: This project would not have been possible without the collaboration, guidance, and assistance of many individuals. I would like to thank Dr. Travis D. Stimeling and Dr. Evan A. MacCarthy for their guidance and support throughout this duration of this project. In particular, I am grateful for their support of creativity and risk. Similarly, I would like to thank Dr. Michael Ibrahim DMA for his musical guidance, support of artistry, and mentorship. I am indebted to Dr. David Taddie for introducing me to electronic music composition and for his technological support at many junctures. I would like to thank Joel Diegert for his assistance and advice at various stages of this project by: helping with debugging, rehearsals, documentation techniques, video editing, and providing musical guidance. I am similarly indebted to Justin Massey for his assistance in rehearsals, managing live sound in performances, and his unfailing “can do” attitude. In addition to composing three works which have become the cornerstone of this document, I would like to thank Ben Carey, Ravi Kittappa, and Peter Kramer for their collegiality in collaboration and friendliness in conversation. Similarly, I am grateful for the members of Mountaineer Musicological Community for their inspirational collegiality, and warm, supportive friendships. I would like to the College of Creative Arts and the School of Music at West Virginia University for material support for concerts and rehearsals. Additionally, I am grateful for their financial support to attend various conferences, particularly the 2016 SOUND WORK: Composition as a Critical Technical Practice seminar which was germinal to the discovery of many of the methodologies in this document. Finally, I would like to thank my family John Paul, Martha, and Mary Claire, for their ceaseless support of my musical career and personal growth. iv Table of Contents: Preface and Chapter Summaries……………………………………………...…...………...…..1-4 Chapter 1: Introduction and Methodology………...…………………………………………..5-36 Chapter 2: Early Interactivity: A Survey and Analysis of the Work of George E. Lewis…...37-77 Chapter 3: Chapter 3: Interaction through Embodiment and Re-Embodiment………......….78-95 Chapter 4: Auto-Ethnography of Experience with Interactive Electronic Systems………...96-137 Works Cited……………………………………………………………………………..…137-144 1 Preface and Chapter Summaries At Google’s May 2018 I/O, the company’s CEO, Sundar Pichai, unveiled a groundbreaking development in Google’s “assistant” technology called google Duplex. Pichai described Duplex as designed to help connect customers to businesses. To demonstrate these functions, Pichai nonchalantly asked Duplex to schedule a hair appointment. Immediately, Duplex initiated a phone conversation with a human receptionist of an actual hair salon. Throughout the conversation, Duplex performs perfectly. The receptionist asks a number of questions, trying to clarify the time and services required for the appointment. Duplex negotiates the conversation convincingly, making logical inferences and responding with appropriate follow up questions. At the conclusion of the conversation the audience applauds, marveling at the success of the interaction and, no doubt, the countless minutes they will save with the new feature.1 In the 21st century, interactions with “intelligent” devices are increasingly commonplace. Absent novelty, what explains the enthusiastic response from the audience? Simply put, the Duplex virtual assistant exhibits nothing in the interaction to hint that it is indeed not a human. Its cool female voice, natural upbeat speech cadence and word choice all adhere to appropriate English language conversational conventions. A confirmatory “mhm” to the human secretary’s request for a few seconds of time to verify the schedule strikes the audience as particularly humorous. Duplex’s natural response becomes both impressive and humorous to the audience, who marvels at the apparent spontaneity and deception. The human secretary has no idea she is speaking to a computer program. In fact, the interaction is startling similar to what we expect of an interaction between two humans. The groundbreaking and incredibly refined technology that powers Duplex certainly contributes to the perception of the success of this interaction. However, beneath the veneer of highly advanced 1 This demonstration of google assistant can be viewed at the following link from 35:04-37:50 https://youtu.be/ogfYd705cRs?t=2104 . 2 technology, Duplex succeeds because it meets the expectations of both the identity and agency of a human being. But whose expectations? In this instance, Duplex appears to meets the expectations of the apparently uninformed human secretary as well as those watching the interactions. Underpinning the expectations from both of these perspectives lie assumptions about the identity and agency of Duplex, as well as the nature of the interaction itself. Listen to the conversation again. Note that the incredible computational powers of the system are described by Pichai as an “assistant” to the human user. This assistant is realized through the accent and speech patterns of an ostensibly white, urban dwelling woman. In the interaction, the human and non- human assistant appear to negotiate the particulars of appointment in relatively neutral manner. No party is perceivably in control of the conversation… at least from the perspective of the secretary. The audience observing this interaction appears to a least want the non-human secretary to be human. The laughter in response to the interjectory “mhm” reveals a slight, if only light-hearted affirmation of this human response and the human-like identity of Duplex. Yet this laughter reveals an understanding of Duplex which places the audience in a position of power over Duplex. The audience is ultimately in control over deciding whether or not Duplex acts appropriately. The source of this power is drawn from the identities of this audience: designers, developers, and supporters
Recommended publications
  • Voice Phenomenon Electronic
    Praised by Morton Feldman, courted by John Cage, bombarded with sound waves by Alvin Lucier: the unique voice of singer and composer Joan La Barbara has brought her adventures on American contemporary music’s wildest frontiers, while her own compositions and shamanistic ‘sound paintings’ place the soprano voice at the outer limits of human experience. By Julian Cowley. Photography by Mark Mahaney Electronic Joan La Barbara has been widely recognised as a so particularly identifiable with me, although they still peerless interpreter of music by major contemporary want to utilise my expertise. That’s OK. I’m willing to composers including Morton Feldman, John Cage, share my vocabulary, but I’m also willing to approach a Earle Brown, Alvin Lucier, Robert Ashley and her new idea and try to bring my knowledge and curiosity husband, Morton Subotnick. And she has developed to that situation, to help the composer realise herself into a genuinely distinctive composer, what she or he wants to do. In return, I’ve learnt translating rigorous explorations in the outer reaches compositional tools by apprenticing, essentially, with of the human voice into dramatic and evocative each of the composers I’ve worked with.” music. In conversation she is strikingly self-assured, Curiosity has played a consistently important role communicating something of the commitment and in La Barbara’s musical life. She was formally trained intensity of vision that have enabled her not only as a classical singer with conventional operatic roles to give definitive voice to the music of others, in view, but at the end of the 1960s her imagination but equally to establish a strong compositional was captured by unorthodox sounds emanating from identity owing no obvious debt to anyone.
    [Show full text]
  • Live-Electronic Music
    live-Electronic Music GORDON MUMMA This b()oll br.gills (lnd (')uis with (1/1 flnO/wt o/Ihe s/u:CIIlflli01I$, It:clmulogira{ i,m(I1M/;OIn, find oC('(uimwf bold ;lIslJiraliml Iltll/ mm"k Ihe his­ lory 0/ ciec/muir 111111';(", 8u/ the oIJt:ninf!, mui dosing dlll/J/er.f IIr/! in {art t/l' l)I dilfcl'CIIt ltiJ'ton'es. 0110 Luerd ng looks UfI("/,- 1,'ulIl Ihr vll l/laga poillt of a mnn who J/(u pel'smlfl.lly tui(I/I'sscd lite 1)Inl'ch 0/ t:lcrh'Ollic tccJlIlulogy {mm II lmilll lIellr i/s beg-ilmings; he is (I fl'ndj/l(lnnlly .~{'hooletJ cOml)fJj~l' whQ Iws g/"lulll/llly (lb!Jfll'ued demenls of tlli ~ iedmoiQI!J' ;11(0 1111 a/rc(uiy-/orllleti sCI al COlli· plJSifion(l/ allillldes IInti .rki{l$. Pm' GarrlOll M umma, (m fllr. other IWfI((, dec­ lroll;c lerllll%gy has fllw/lys hetl! pre.telll, f'/ c objeci of 01/ fl/)sm'uillg rlln'osily (mrl inUre.fI. lu n MmSI; M 1I11111W'S Idslur)l resltllle! ",here [ . IIt:1lillg'S /(.;lIve,( nff, 1',,( lIm;lI­ i11g Ihe dCTleiojJlm!lIls ill dec/m1/ ;,. IIII/sir br/MI' 19j(), 1101 ~'/J IIIlIrli liS exlell­ siom Of $/ili em'fier lec1m%gicni p,"uedcnh b111, mOw,-, as (upcclS of lite eCQllol/lic lind soci(ll Irislm)' of the /.!I1riotl, F rom litis vh:wJ}f)il1/ Ite ('on,~i d ".r.f lHU'iQII.f kint/s of [i"t! fu! r/urmrl1lcI' wilh e/cclnmic medifl; sl/)""m;ys L'oilabomlive 1>t:rformrl1lce groU/JS (Illd speril/f "heme,f" of cIIgilli:C'-;lIg: IUltl ex/,/orcs in dt:lllil fill: in/tulmet: 14 Ihe new If'dllllJiolO' 011 pop, 10/1(, rock, nllrl jllu /Ill/SIC llJi inJlnwu:lI/s m'c modified //till Ille recording studio maltel'
    [Show full text]
  • Johnny O'neal
    OCTOBER 2017—ISSUE 186 YOUR FREE GUIDE TO THE NYC JAZZ SCENE NYCJAZZRECORD.COM BOBDOROUGH from bebop to schoolhouse VOCALS ISSUE JOHNNY JEN RUTH BETTY O’NEAL SHYU PRICE ROCHÉ Managing Editor: Laurence Donohue-Greene Editorial Director & Production Manager: Andrey Henkin To Contact: The New York City Jazz Record 66 Mt. Airy Road East OCTOBER 2017—ISSUE 186 Croton-on-Hudson, NY 10520 United States Phone/Fax: 212-568-9628 NEw York@Night 4 Laurence Donohue-Greene: Interview : JOHNNY O’NEAL 6 by alex henderson [email protected] Andrey Henkin: [email protected] Artist Feature : JEN SHYU 7 by suzanne lorge General Inquiries: [email protected] ON The Cover : BOB DOROUGH 8 by marilyn lester Advertising: [email protected] Encore : ruth price by andy vélez Calendar: 10 [email protected] VOXNews: Lest We Forget : betty rochÉ 10 by ori dagan [email protected] LAbel Spotlight : southport by alex henderson US Subscription rates: 12 issues, $40 11 Canada Subscription rates: 12 issues, $45 International Subscription rates: 12 issues, $50 For subscription assistance, send check, cash or VOXNEwS 11 by suzanne lorge money order to the address above or email [email protected] obituaries Staff Writers 12 David R. Adler, Clifford Allen, Duck Baker, Fred Bouchard, Festival Report Stuart Broomer, Robert Bush, 13 Thomas Conrad, Ken Dryden, Donald Elfman, Phil Freeman, Kurt Gottschalk, Tom Greenland, special feature 14 by andrey henkin Anders Griffen, Tyran Grillo, Alex Henderson, Robert Iannapollo, Matthew Kassel, Marilyn Lester, CD ReviewS 16 Suzanne Lorge, Mark Keresman, Marc Medwin, Russ Musto, John Pietaro, Joel Roberts, Miscellany 41 John Sharpe, Elliott Simon, Andrew Vélez, Scott Yanow Event Calendar Contributing Writers 42 Brian Charette, Ori Dagan, George Kanzler, Jim Motavalli “Think before you speak.” It’s something we teach to our children early on, a most basic lesson for living in a society.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Women in Jazz in Britain
    The history of jazz in Britain has been scrutinised in notable publications including Parsonage (2005) The Evolution of Jazz in Britain, 1880-1935 , McKay (2005) Circular Breathing: The Cultural Politics of Jazz in Britain , Simons (2006) Black British Swing and Moore (forthcoming 2007) Inside British Jazz . This body of literature provides a useful basis for specific consideration of the role of women in British jazz. This area is almost completely unresearched but notable exceptions to this trend include Jen Wilson’s work (in her dissertation entitled Syncopated Ladies: British Jazzwomen 1880-1995 and their Influence on Popular Culture ) and George McKay’s chapter ‘From “Male Music” to Feminist Improvising’ in Circular Breathing . Therefore, this chapter will provide a necessarily selective overview of British women in jazz, and offer some limited exploration of the critical issues raised. It is hoped that this will provide a stimulus for more detailed research in the future. Any consideration of this topic must necessarily foreground Ivy Benson 1, who played a fundamental role in encouraging and inspiring female jazz musicians in Britain through her various ‘all-girl’ bands. Benson was born in Yorkshire in 1913 and learned the piano from the age of five. She was something of a child prodigy, performing on Children’s Hour for the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) at the age of nine. She also appeared under the name of ‘Baby Benson’ at Working Men’s Clubs (private social clubs founded in the nineteenth century in industrial areas of Great Britain, particularly in the North, with the aim of providing recreation and education for working class men and their families).
    [Show full text]
  • David Tudor: Live Electronic Music
    LMJ14_001- 11/15/04 9:54 AM Page 106 CD COMPANION INTRODUCTION David Tudor: Live Electronic Music The three pieces on the LMJ14 CD trace the development of David Tudor’s solo electronic music during the period from 1970 to 1984. This work has not been well docu- mented. Recordings of these pieces have never before been released. The three pieces each represent a different collaboration: with Experiments in Art and Technology (EAT), with the Merce Cunningham Dance Company (MCDC) and with Jacqueline Matisse Monnier [1]. The CD’s cover image, Toneburst Map 4, also arises from a collaboration, with the artist Sophia Ogielska. Anima Pepsi (1970) was composed for the pavilion designed by EAT for the 1970 Expo in Osaka, Japan. The piece made extensive use of a processing console consisting of eight identi- cal processors designed and built by Gordon Mumma and a spatialization matrix of 37 loud- speakers. Each processor consisted of a filter, an envelope follower, a ring modulator and a voltage-controlled amplifier. Anima Pepsi used this processing capability to transform a library of recordings of animal and insect sounds together with processed recordings of similar sources. Unlike most of Tudor’s solo electronics, this piece was intended to be performed by other members of the EAT collective, a practical necessity as the piece was to be performed repeatedly as part of the environment of the pavilion for the duration of the exposition. Toneburst (1975) was commissioned to accompany Merce Cunningham’s Sounddance. This recording is from a performance by MCDC, probably at the University of California at Berke- ley, where MCDC appeared fairly regularly.
    [Show full text]
  • Holmes Electronic and Experimental Music
    C H A P T E R 3 Early Electronic Music in the United States I was at a concert of electronic music in Cologne and I noticed that, even though it was the most recent electronic music, the audience was all falling asleep. No matter how interesting the music was, the audience couldn’t stay awake. That was because the music was coming out of loudspeakers. —John Cage Louis and Bebe Barron John Cage and The Project of Music for Magnetic Tape Innovation: John Cage and the Advocacy of Chance Composition Cage in Milan Listen: Early Electronic Music in the United States The Columbia–Princeton Electronic Music Center The Cooperative Studio for Electronic Music Roots of Computer Music Summary Milestones: Early Electronic Music of the United States Plate 3.1 John Cage and David Tudor, 1962. (John Cage Trust) 80 EARLY HISTORY – PREDECESSORS AND PIONEERS Electronic music activity in the United States during the early 1950s was neither organ- ized nor institutional. Experimentation with tape composition took place through the efforts of individual composers working on a makeshift basis without state support. Such fragmented efforts lacked the cohesion, doctrine, and financial support of their Euro- pean counterparts but in many ways the musical results were more diverse, ranging from works that were radically experimental to special effects for popular motion pictures and works that combined the use of taped sounds with live instrumentalists performing on stage. The first electronic music composers in North America did not adhere to any rigid schools of thought regarding the aesthetics of the medium and viewed with mixed skepticism and amusement the aesthetic wars taking place between the French and the Germans.
    [Show full text]
  • Alvin Lucier's
    CHAMBERS This page intentionally left blank CHAMBERS Scores by ALVIN LUCIER Interviews with the composer by DOUGLAS SIMON Wesleyan University Press Middletown, Connecticut Scores copyright © 1980 by Alvin Lucier Interviews copyright © 1980 by Alvin Lucier and Douglas Simon Several of these scores and interviews have appeared in similar or different form in Arts in Society; Big Deal; The Painted Bride Quar- terly; Parachute; Pieces 3; The Something Else Yearbook; Source Magazine; and Individuals: Post-Movement Art in America, edited by Alan Sondheim (New York: E.P. Dutton, 1977). Typography by Jill Kroesen The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of a Wesleyan University Project Grant. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Lucier, Alvin. [Works. Selections] Chambers. Concrete music. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Concrete music. 2. Chance compositions. 3. Lucier, Alvin. 4. Composers—United States- Interviews. I. Simon, Douglas, 1947- II. Title. M1470.L72S5 789.9'8 79-24870 ISBN 0-8195-5042-6 Distributed by Columbia University Press 136 South Broadway, Irvington, N.Y. Printed in the United States of America First edition For Ellen Parry and Wendy Stokes This page intentionally left blank CONTENTS Preface ix 1. Chambers 1 2. Vespers 15 3. "I Am Sitting in a Room" 29 4. (Hartford) Memory Space 41 5. Quasimodo the Great Lover 53 6. Music for Solo Performer 67 7. The Duke of York 79 8. The Queen of the South and Tyndall Orchestrations 93 9. Gentle Fire 109 10. Still and Moving Lines of Silence in Families of Hyperbolas 127 11. Outlines and Bird and Person Dyning 145 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Academiccatalog 2017.Pdf
    New England Conservatory Founded 1867 290 Huntington Avenue Boston, Massachusetts 02115 necmusic.edu (617) 585-1100 Office of Admissions (617) 585-1101 Office of the President (617) 585-1200 Office of the Provost (617) 585-1305 Office of Student Services (617) 585-1310 Office of Financial Aid (617) 585-1110 Business Office (617) 585-1220 Fax (617) 262-0500 New England Conservatory is accredited by the New England Association of Schools and Colleges. New England Conservatory does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, age, national or ethnic origin, sexual orientation, physical or mental disability, genetic make-up, or veteran status in the administration of its educational policies, admission policies, employment policies, scholarship and loan programs or other Conservatory-sponsored activities. For more information, see the Policy Sections found in the NEC Student Handbook and Employee Handbook. Edited by Suzanne Hegland, June 2016. #e information herein is subject to change and amendment without notice. Table of Contents 2-3 College Administrative Personnel 4-9 College Faculty 10-11 Academic Calendar 13-57 Academic Regulations and Information 59-61 Health Services and Residence Hall Information 63-69 Financial Information 71-85 Undergraduate Programs of Study Bachelor of Music Undergraduate Diploma Undergraduate Minors (Bachelor of Music) 87 Music-in-Education Concentration 89-105 Graduate Programs of Study Master of Music Vocal Pedagogy Concentration Graduate Diploma Professional String Quartet Training Program Professional
    [Show full text]
  • Too Many Notes: Complexity and Culture in Voyager Lewis, George E
    Too Many Notes: Complexity and Culture in Voyager Lewis, George E. Leonardo Music Journal, Volume 10, 2000, pp. 33-39 (Article) Published by The MIT Press For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/lmj/summary/v010/10.1lewis.html Access Provided by University of California @ Santa Cruz at 09/27/11 9:42PM GMT W A Y S WAYS & MEANS & M E A Too Many Notes: Computers, N S Complexity and Culture in Voyager ABSTRACT The author discusses his computer music composition, Voyager, which employs a com- George E. Lewis puter-driven, interactive “virtual improvising orchestra” that ana- lyzes an improvisor’s performance in real time, generating both com- plex responses to the musician’s playing and independent behavior arising from the program’s own in- oyager [1,2] is a nonhierarchical, interactive mu- pears to stand practically alone in ternal processes. The author con- V the trenchancy and thoroughness tends that notions about the na- sical environment that privileges improvisation. In Voyager, improvisors engage in dialogue with a computer-driven, inter- of its analysis of these issues with ture and function of music are active “virtual improvising orchestra.” A computer program respect to computer music. This embedded in the structure of soft- ware-based music systems and analyzes aspects of a human improvisor’s performance in real viewpoint contrasts markedly that interactions with these sys- time, using that analysis to guide an automatic composition with Catherine M. Cameron’s [7] tems tend to reveal characteris- (or, if you will, improvisation) program that generates both rather celebratory ethnography- tics of the community of thought complex responses to the musician’s playing and indepen- at-a-distance of what she terms and culture that produced them.
    [Show full text]
  • Live Performance
    LIVE PERFORMANCE LIVE PERFORMANCE AND MIDI Introduction Question: How do you perform electronic music without tape? Answer: Take away the tape. Since a great deal of early electroacoustic music was created in radio stations and since radio stations used tape recordings in broadcast, it seemed natural for electroacoustic music to have its final results on tape as well. But music, unlike radio, is traditionally presented to audiences in live performance. The ritual of performance was something that early practitioners of EA did not wish to forsake, but they also quickly realized that sitting in a darkened hall with only inanimate loudspeakers on stage would be an unsatisfactory concert experience for any audience. HISTORY The Italian composer Bruno Maderna, who later established the Milan electronic music studio with Luciano Berio, saw this limitation almost immediately, and in 1952, he created a work in the Stockhausen's Cologne studio for tape and performer. “Musica su Due Dimensioni” was, in Maderna’s words, “the first attempt to combine the past possibilities of mechanical instrumental music with the new possibilities of electronic tone generation.” Since that time, there have been vast numbers of EA works created using this same model of performer and tape. On the one hand, such works do give the audience a visual focal point and bring performance into the realm of electroacoustic music. However, the relationship between the two media is inflexible; unlike a duet between two instrumental performers, which involves complex musical compromises, the tape continues with its fixed material, regardless of the live performer’s actions. 50s + 60s 1950s and 60s Karlheinz Stockhausen was somewhat unique in the world of electroacoustic music, because he was not only a pioneering composer of EA but also a leading acoustic composer.
    [Show full text]
  • Gordon Mumma Was Born in 1935 in Framingham, Massachusetts. He
    Gordon Mumma was born in 1935 in Framingham, Massachusetts. He studied piano and horn in Chicago and Detroit, and his early performing career was as a horn player in classical symphonic and chamber music. In 1952 he entered the University of Michigan, where he engaged with the group of young composers in the class of Ross Lee Finney. In Ann Arbor he co-founded with Robert Ashley the Cooperative Studio for Electronic Music (1958–66), and again with Ashley collaborated in Milton Cohen’s Space Theatre (1957–64) along with a group of uniquely creative individuals in art, architecture, and film. Mumma was one of the organizers of the historic ONCE Festival (1961–66), which made Ann Arbor an important site for the performance of innovative new music. The Ann Arbor years demonstrate the early significance of collaboration in Mumma’s creative process. Working connections with other musicians and artists in many disciplines—especially dance and film—have inspired and nourished much of his work as a composer, performer, instrument builder, and electronics wizard. From 1966 to 1974 he was, with John Cage and David Tudor, one of the composer-musicians with the Merce Cunningham Dance Company, for which he composed four commissioned works, including Mesa (1966) and Telepos (1971), and worked closely with Cunningham on his solo choreography for Loops (1971). During those years he also performed in the Sonic Arts Union with Robert Ashley, David Behrman, and Alvin Lucier. He has collaborated with such diverse artists as Tandy Beal, Anthony Braxton, Fred Frith, Pauline Oliveros, Yvonne Rainer, Tom Robbins, Stan VanDerBeek, and Christian Wolff.
    [Show full text]
  • Dossier De Presse
    rec tdic iph cseé uqp, luoJ Dossier de presse ieuo e"rn rAMH qka uas iDrs laie stfl eral saS tb cir oJea naev cvta oaei c"nl t,cl éqo ,uma aipv ulae tegc onp bril aeé pgdt tieh isDo sthr érae Fefd oae uvr reYt tcoi hlus West ose rmes lufd http://www.amr-geneve.ch/amr-jazz-festival dseo (itn Compilation des groupes du festival disponible sur demande qcPt uiaB Contact médias: Leïla Kramis [email protected], tél: 022 716 56 37/ 078 793 50 72 aeo tnla AMR / Sud des Alpes rsob 10, rue des Alpes, 1201 Genève iAFa T + 41 22 716 56 30 / F + 41 22 716 56 39 èbrM mdea eosa 35e AMR Jazz Festival – dossier de presse 1 mul oM., nbH Table des matières I. L’AMR EN BREF....................................................................................................................................... 3 II. SURVOL DES CONCERTS..................................................................................................................... 4 III. DOSSIERS ARTISTIQUES..................................................................................................................... 5 PARALOG.............................................................................................................................................. 5 JOE LOVANO QUARTET...................................................................................................................... 7 PLAISTOW........................................................................................................................................... 10 J KLEBA............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]