Inventory of Unconveyed State School Lands and Tide and Submerged

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Inventory of Unconveyed State School Lands and Tide and Submerged -l \ ' ! '1f' (I)· "'';,, ' \ . '11tfEN1'01t¥I ':tfp 1//!f?JNV~'thn ""' ,/ "i-,cefJ' ~cJ-/,'/1 Qe'T"fAl"r,E' "'' 1'QeA:'1/1 AAr 'CF'ia\MfnQ ~ .. , {::o .1. p~f .r.;, ') c,~. :1 ~~L J~~1r,:1,. t_..JJd,, ~ i11~ ·.f&} ~\#,f~~j ~t PO&S.EsSJN6 ~iGNiFiCAllT ~~l~!~Olf Jef !J,YT 41:3 :JY;4~f!~§J:3 INVENTORY 01<' UNCONVEYED STATE SCHOOL LANDS AND TIDE AND SUBMERGED LANDS P0SSF.SSING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES Prepared Bv STATE LANDS DIVISION 1807 13th Street Sacramento, California 95814 December 1, 1975 ABSENCE OF A PMn!C'J~t? [''D. T::~D SPECIES FROM THE "RE!,1t:,,'. ;'· OF A PARCEL DOES NOT [,'.EM! 1:t\T SUCH SPECIES DOES NOT EXIST WITHif·l THAT PAECEL I N T R O D U C T I O N The State Lands Commission has prepared this report for the California Legislature as a general identification and classification of those unconveyed State school lands and tide and submerged lands which possess significant environmental values. This publication incorporates evaluated and pertinent comments received on the initial draft report which was circulated statewide in February 1975. The absence of a particular waterway or parcel from the report does not mean that the State does not claim ownership of that parcel or waterway, or that such specific parcel or waterway has no significant environmental values. This report is not intended to establish ownership, only to identify those parcels which possess significant environmental values. Staff was unable to physically inventory all of the considered lands; instead, the advice and participation of those with known environ­ mental expertise was utilized as additional to staff survey. Tide and submerged lands under the jurisdiction of the State Lands Commission are those sovereign lands received from the Federal Government by virtue of California's admission to the Union on an equal footing with the original States. Such lands, and State interest therein, are generally the lands waterward of the ordinary high water mark of the Pacific Ocean (seaward to a three-mile limit); tidal bays, sloughs, estuaries; and, navigable lakes and streams within the State. State school lands under the jurisdiction of the Commission are composed of the 16th and 36th sections of each township. The Federal Government transferred these lands to the State in 1853, in order to establish a financial foundation for a public school system. In cases where the 16th and 36th sections were mineral in character, incomplete as to acreage total, or already claimed or granted by the Federal Government, the State was permitted to select other lands "in lieu" of the specific sections. The public trust of commerce, navigation and fisheries which the State retains on patented sovereign lands should also be considered included in this inventory. Wherever a waterway, or body of water, is listed or mapped, the common trust state interest in patented sovereign lands, if any, is also included. The State Lands Commission emphasized when it adopted this report at its December 1, 1975 meeting that all tide and submerged lands are significant by the nature of their public ownership. Only because of the methodology used for this report are all of these waterways not specifically listed in this inventory. It is the intent of the State Lands Commission that this report be periodically updated. It should be considered as an informational document to assist the Legislature, the Commission, and the public in considering the environmental aspects of a proposed project and the significant values to be protected therein. S U M M A R Y Authorization and Requirements Section 6370 of the California Public Resources Code was enacted in 1970 (Chapter 1555), and subsequently amended in 1973 with the enactment of Chapter 688. This report was authorized by Section 6370, as subsequently amended by Sections 6370.1 and 6370.2. The statute and sections, as amended, required the State Lands Commission to: A. Inventory unconveyed State school and tide and submerged lands; B. Identify those lands which possess significant environmental values of statewide interest; C. Adopt regulations necessary to assure permanent protection to such lands; and, to make a final report to the Legislature on such lands containing criteria imposed, along with any recommendations of additional action necessary for permanent protection of such identified lands. Early Implementation Amendments to the original legislation affected the prompt inventory and identification of lands possessing environmental values. Additional sections to the Public Resources Code created the following changes in original concept: A. The Commission now would be required to act in concert with both the Resources Agency and the Office of Planning and Research, instead of acting jointly with the Resources Agency alone. B. The original description "unique environmental value" was changed to "significant environmental value". C. The Office of Planning and Research was required to define "significant environmental value" and to submit such definition to the State Lands Commission for approval and adoption at a public meeting. D. The Commission was required to submit the adopted definition, including supportive reasoning, to the Legislature no later than January 15, 1974. E. The final report was to be presented to the Legis­ lature on Janaury 15, 1975, and to include regula­ tions for protection of the identified lands. Inventory of State Lands An exhaustive inventory of State Lands Commission records covering school lands and tide and submerged lands was accomplished. All conveyance and acquisition records maintained by the State Lands Division were re-evaluated to guarantee that the inventory of school lands under the Commission's jurisdiction was all-inclusive. Each unconveyed school land parcel was given a six­ digit identification number. The specific sites were then posted on a set of county maps at a scale of one-half inch to the mile. These maps are on file in this office and available for reference. Additional inventory of Division records was undertaken to identify waterways in the State that are owned in fee by the State of California, or in which the State has a retained ownership interest; i.e., for purposes of public trust and easement. This inventory should be studied in the context of the following paragraph from Section 6376 of the Public Resources Code: "It is the intent of the Legislature that any inventory prepared pursuant to this chapter shall be solely for environmental purposes and not to establish rights of ownership. (Emphasis addect.'") Any boundaries,maps, or descriptions by the Commission in any such inventory shall not be binding upon any upland owner or any part affected thereby." No waiver or disclaimer of possible ownership rights in any waterways which may not have been included in the Draft Report or this report is intended. The inventory also did not attempt to include all waterways in which the State's interest consists only of the public easement for commerce, navigation, and fishery (including recreational uses), as distinct from fee ownership. Copies of the draft maps, showing the school lands and the waterways inventory, were sent to various governmental entities, as well as to interested organizations and individuals. Distribu­ tion was made of the criteria for identifying lands possessing environmental values. This criteria is outlined in Appendix 1. Preliminary Classification Amendment of the code to classify environmental values as "significant" rather than "unique" required a complete reassessment of work previously completed and extended the time frame for report completion. A re-evaluation of received inputs was initiated. All parcels previously identified as possessing ''unique" values were integrated iQto the new, broader "significant" definition. In addition, all nominations that had been initially rejected as not possessing "unique" values were re-evaluated for "significant" possiblities. Classifications of all nominated parcels were clarified and the following elements established: Geological Biological Paleontological Rare or Endanarred Plants Scenic or aesthetic Rare or Preci, ',S Mineral Source Watershed Speleological Rare or Endangered Species Fish Spawning and Nursery Critical Eco-system Critical Water Source Fishery and Wildlife Habitat Season Wildlife Support Areas Recreational Archaeological Historical including Landmark All nominations were reviewed and assigned to the above categories by Commission staff. All data from those participating in the nomination and inventory process are on file at this office and available for reference as to description of value. Criteria to Review Nominations Several levels of evaluation were established as criteria to determine whether or not a nominated parcel should be included in the inventory of lands with significantly environmental value. These were: 1. That the nominated parcel fit into at least one of the categories outlined in Exhibit A of Appendix 1. 2. That the nomination come from: a. A Resources Agency representative commenting on material within his specific field of expertise; or, b. An expert so identified through educa­ tion and/or experience who was recog­ nized by his peer group, and who was commenting within his specific field of expertise. 3. That the nomination serve a statewide interest. 4. That the nominated parcel be an integral part of a surrounding area which would meet the cri ho.ria. Nominations received were reviewed by Division staff to 3ssure that the criteria were properly applied. Identified
Recommended publications
  • Creating Memorable Travel Experiences Since 1979 2021
    2021 DREAM BOOK LLC CREATING MEMORABLE TRAVEL EXPERIENCES SINCE 1979 One from the Road… When we returned to the road in August, one of our first trips was By the end of the tour, you feel like you just watched Ellen, Dr. Phil across Nevada to pick up the historic (which later and Saturday Night Live. You have truly met the locals once you Lincoln Highway SUCCESS STORIES—A SpECIAl AdvERTISIng SECTIOn became U.S. 50) and make our way back to Sacramento. Small finish walking among the headstones. towns proved to be a good way to gently try and return to traveling. Sure, we would all I didn’t know Wally would even be in town. Last I heard he was prefer not to have to wear a mask and wash buying a camper and heading out to see the world when he retired. our hands every 20 minutes. But if you love For reasons I’m hopeful I’ll hear about some day, he was back in to travel, right now you have to make a few Eureka. compromises. With any luck, those will be short term and we will be able to travel more It’s possible the folks on the trip may have noticed the tear in my eye freely soon. or the crack in my voice when my friend showed up to say hi. Or when he starting telling a couple members of our group about the Our trip went well. We slipped in and out of a cemetery tour and I broke out laughing really loud.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Adventures Easy Trips to Take with the Kids, 15 from a Scenic Drive in Sedona to a Pioneer Museum in Snowflake
    Perkinsville Road — No Yep. Bisbee’s Ballpark Is The Ferocious Nature Guardrails,THE STATE’SNo Problem BESTEven HORSEOlder Than TRAILS. Fenway ofGIDDYUP! the Cactus Wren w MAY 2009 ESCAPE. EXPLORE. EXPERIENCE family adventures Easy Trips to Take With the Kids, 15 From a Scenic Drive in Sedona to a Pioneer Museum in Snowflake Restaurants ARIZONA BY HELICOPTER: The Ultimate Way +to See the State CANOEING THE COLORADO HIKING THE MOGOLLON RIM contents 05.09 features Grand Canyon National Park 14 FAMILY ADVENTURES Williams Topock Gorge Clark Griswold wasn’t worried about finding the Grand Canyon. Jerome “It’s the biggest hole in the world,” he said in Family Vacation. Mogollon Rim Whether you’re loading up the “Family Truckster” for a trip to the world’s Seventh Natural Wonder, or just looking for a quick, PHOENIX economical family adventure all your own, Arizona has some- Tucson thing for every family. BY KELLY KRAMER Bisbee 20 WATER, WATER EVERYWHERE POINTS OF INTEREST IN THIS ISSUE Arizona isn’t exactly known for its water supply. Canyons and cactuses, yes; water, no. Well, like the Arizona Cardinals, who proved that a football team from the desert really could go to the Super Bowl, we’re using this month’s portfolio to prove that Arizona has some of the most spectacular watering holes in the world. BY GARY LADD 30 A BETTER VIEW The Grand Canyon is spectacular no matter where you’re departments standing — on the South Rim, along the river or on the roof of a Winnebago. Those vantage points, however, pale in compari- 2 EDITOR’S LETTER 3 CONTRIBUTORS 4 LETTERS TO THE EDITOR son to the views you’ll get from a Robinson R44 Raven II heli- 5 THE JOURNAL copter.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Trough to Trough
    Trough to trough The Colorado River and the Salton Sea Robert E. Reynolds, editor The Salton Sea, 1906 Trough to trough—the field trip guide Robert E. Reynolds, George T. Jefferson, and David K. Lynch Proceedings of the 2008 Desert Symposium Robert E. Reynolds, compiler California State University, Desert Studies Consortium and LSA Associates, Inc. April 2008 Front cover: Cibola Wash. R.E. Reynolds photograph. Back cover: the Bouse Guys on the hunt for ancient lakes. From left: Keith Howard, USGS emeritus; Robert Reynolds, LSA Associates; Phil Pearthree, Arizona Geological Survey; and Daniel Malmon, USGS. Photo courtesy Keith Howard. 2 2008 Desert Symposium Table of Contents Trough to trough: the 2009 Desert Symposium Field Trip ....................................................................................5 Robert E. Reynolds The vegetation of the Mojave and Colorado deserts .....................................................................................................................31 Leah Gardner Southern California vanadate occurrences and vanadium minerals .....................................................................................39 Paul M. Adams The Iron Hat (Ironclad) ore deposits, Marble Mountains, San Bernardino County, California ..................................44 Bruce W. Bridenbecker Possible Bouse Formation in the Bristol Lake basin, California ................................................................................................48 Robert E. Reynolds, David M. Miller, and Jordon Bright Review
    [Show full text]
  • (LHFO) Proposed Resource Management Plan
    United States Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 Phoenix, Arizona 85021-4951 Telephone: (602) 242-0210 FAX: (602) 242-2513 In Reply Refer To: AESO/SE 02-21-05-F-0784 June 15, 2006 Memorandum To: Field Manager, Lake Havasu Field Office, Bureau of Land Management, Lake Havasu City, Arizona From: Field Supervisor Subject: Biological Opinion on the Effects of the Lake Havasu Field Office (LHFO) Proposed Resource Management Plan Thank you for your request for formal section 7 consultation on the final Lake Havasu Field Office District Proposed Resource Management Plan (PRMP), pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544), as amended (Act). Species addressed in this consultation include effects of your proposed action on the following species: • Endangered southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) (SWWF) • Threatened bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) (BAEA) • Endangered razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus) (RBS) and critical habitat. • Endangered bonytail chub (Gila elegans) (BTC) and critical habitat • Endangered Yuma clapper rail (Rallus longirostris yumanensis) (YCR) • Threatened desert tortoise – Mohave Desert Population (Gopherus agassizii) (MDT) You have also requested our concurrence with your determination that the proposed action may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect, the endangered California brown pelican (Pelicanus occidentalis californicus) and the candidate western yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus occidentalis). We concur with these determinations, which are addressed in Appendix A at the end of this memorandum. This biological opinion (BO) is based on information provided in the November 28, 2005, biological assessment (BA), the PRMP EIS, email correspondence, updated memos, telephone conversations, site investigations, meetings between the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and us, and other sources of information (all this information is considered part of the proposed 2 action).
    [Show full text]
  • Outings 1985-2005
    1985 11 /16-17 Tehachapi Base Camp and Horseback Ride 12/14-15 Arroyo Seco Backpack - 8:00 am 1986 1/18-19 Joshua Tree Father/Son Outing - 8:00 am 2/15-17 Death Valley/ Furnace Creek Camp/ Telescope Peak climb (Families) 3/15-16 Cucamonga Wilderness Backpack - 8:00 am 4/5-13 Havasupai Indian Reservation Backpack 4/25-26 Camp-0-Ree - 4:00 pm 5/16-18 Colorado River Canoe Trip - 4:00 pm 6/28-29 Halley's Comet Watch at Table Mountain 7/11-14 High Sierra Backpack: Mosquito Flats 8/9-15 Camp Cherry Valley (Summer Camp) 9/19-21 Father/Son Beach Outing - 5:00 pm 10/18-19 Bike Outing to Santa Barbara - 8:00 am 11/14-16 Henninger Flats Backpack Outing - 5:00 pm 12/13 Strawberry Peak Day Hike - 8:00 am 1987 1/16-18 Joshua Tree Father/Son Outing - 4:00 pm 2/7-8 Snow Shoe Winter Backpack Camp at Buckhorn - 8:00 am 3/14-15 Bear Canyon Backpack - 8:00 am 4/4-12 Zion-Bryce Canyon extended backpack 5/1-2 Camp-0-Ree - 4:00 pm 5/15-17 Colorado River Canoe Trip - 4:00 pm 6/20-27 Mt. Whitney Backpack 7/17-18 Piute Pass Backpack - 8:00 am 8/8-14 Summer Camp 9/18-20 Father/Son Beach Outing - 5:00 pm 10/17-18 Mt. Baden Poweil Backpack - 8:00 am 10/24-25 Oakwilde Backpacking Trip - 9:00 am 11/21-22 Cooper Canyon Outing - 9:00 am 12/19 Mount Lowe Day Hike - 8:00 am 1988 1/15-17 Joshua Tree Father/Son Outing - 4:00 pm 2/13-14 Chilao Snow Shoe Winter Backpack Camp - 8:00 am 3/18-20 Lake Cachuma/Santa Ynez Valley Bike Tour - 4:00 pm 4/3-9 Grand Canyon Backpack 5/6-7 Camp-0-Ree - 4:00 pm 5/21-22 Canoe Trip or Whitewater Rafting - 8:00 am 6/18 Deep Sea Fishing - 8:00
    [Show full text]
  • Ca-Lower-Colorado-River-Valley-Pkwy
    I • I I I ) I I A REPORT TO THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES ---1 I 'I I I I THE LOWER I COLORADO I RIVER I VALLEY • PARKWAY I I D- '°'le> F; 1-e. ·• NFS- ' f\CAc:.+... \ V"C. , ~ P,of>oseol I ~~~~=-'~c f~l~~c~~w I THE LOWER COLORADO I filVERVALLEYPARKWAY I I I A proposal for a National Parkway and Scenic Recreation Road System along the Lower Colorado River Valley in 'I California, Arizona, and Nevada. I NATIONAL PARK .i DENVER SEfiViC I ·-.-:. a.t ..1flkllb""ll.--';,.i. n II"~ r.· " •· \..' ;: · I ;:~::::.;.;:;.:J I I I U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service I in cooperation with Lower Colorado River Office Bureau of Land Management • PLE~\SE RtTUR?j TO: I February 1969 I , lJnited States Department of the Interior OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY I WASHINGTON, D.C. 20240 I I Dear Mr. President: We are pleased to transmit herewith. a report on the feasibility anc;l desirability of developing a nation~l p;;i.rkwa,y and sc;enic recreation I road system within. the Lower C9l9rado River· Vaiiey in Arizona, Califo~nia, and Nevada, from the Lake Mead National Recreation I Area and Davis Dam on the north to the International Boup.d:;i.ry ~ith Mexico on the south in: the vicinity of San Luis, Arizqna arid Mexic.o.· . ·. ' .. ·.' . ·. I This :i;eport is based on ci. study 11,'lade by the Lower Col<;>rado River Office ap.d the NatiQnal :Par~ Service pf this Depa.rtmep.t with engineerin.g assistance by the Buqlau of Public Roads of the Departmep.t of .
    [Show full text]
  • Toiyabe National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan Table of Contents
    United States Department of Agriculture NATIONAL FOREST PREFACE This National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan) was developed to direct the management of the Toiyabe National Forest. The goal df the Plan is to provide a management program reflective of a mixture of management activities that allow use and protection of Forest resources; fulfill legislative requirements; and address local, regional, and national issues and concerns. To accomplish this, the Forest Plan: SPECIFIES THE STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES AND THE APPROXIMATE TIMING AND VICINITY OF THE PRACTICES NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE THAT DIRECTION; AND ESTABLISHES THE MONITORING AND EVALUATION REQUIREMENTS NEEDED TO ENSURE THAT THE DIRECTION IS CARRIED OUT AND TO DETERMINE HOW WELL OUTPUTS AND EFFECTS WERE PREDICTED. The Forest Plan will be reviewed (and updated if necessary) at least every five years. It will be revised on a IO- to 15-year cycle. Preparation of the Forest Plan is required by the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act (RPA) as amended by the National Forest Management Act (NFMA). Assessment of its environmental impacts is required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the implementing regulations of NFMA (36 WR 219). The Forest Plan replaces all previous resource management plans prepared for the Toiyabe National Forest. Upon approval of the Forest Plan, all subsequent activities affecting the Forest must be in compliance with the Forest Plan. In addition, all permits, contracts and other instruments for the use and 0 occupancy of National Forest System lands mst be in conformance with the Forest Plan. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PLANNINC LEVELS Development of this Forest Plan occurs within the framework of Forest Service regional and national planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment
    Environmental Assessment Needles-Topock Area (River Mile A-240.5 to A-238.5) Bankline Stabilization Project (a) (b) U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Yuma Area Office Yuma, Arizona May 2006 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Environmental Assessment Needles-Topock Area (River Mile A-240.5 to A-238.5) Bankline Stabilization Project Prepared for: Yuma Area Office Environmental Group Prepared by: Jason Associates Corporation Yuma, Arizona Contract No.: 03-PE-34-0230 Acronyms and Abbreviations ACB Articulated concrete block ADEQ Arizona Department of Environmental Quality AGFD Arizona Game and Fish Department AMM Avoidance and Minimization Measure BCO Biological and Conference Opinion BE Biological Evaluation BMP(s) Best Management Practice(s) CAA Clean Air Act CDFG California Department of Fish and Game CEQ Council of Environmental Quality CFR Code of Federal Regulations cfs Cubic feet per second cu yds Cubic yards CWA Clean Water Act DM Department Manual DOI United States Department of the Interior EA Environmental Assessment EO Executive Order EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency ESA Endangered Species Act FONSI Finding of No Significant Impact FR Federal Register ft Feet FWCA Federal Wildlife Coordination Act gmp Gallons per minute HNWR Havasu National Wildlife Refuge LCR Lower Colorado River MSCP Multi Species Conservation Program NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NHPA National Historic Preservation Act NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NRHP National Register of Historic Places OHW Ordinary high water OLW Ordinary low water P.L.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.12 Recreation
    3.12 RECREATION INTRODUCTION This section analyzes the impacts of the Whole Foods and the Park Shopping Center Project on park and recreation resources. The analysis in this section was based on the City of Malibu’s General Plan EIR, prepared by Harland Bartholomew and Associates, the Malibu Creek State Park, General Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report, the California Department of Parks and Recreation, and the City of Malibu Department of Parks and Recreation. These sources are incorporated by reference. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Existing Conditions The project site is currently vacant. Past uses on the site include a private skate park. The skate park was closed on October 31, 2011, several months before the proposed project’s notice of preparation (NOP) was released on April 26, 2012. City of Malibu Recreational opportunities within the City of Malibu consist of parks, athletic fields, open space, trails, and coastal amenities, including coastal parks, beaches, campgrounds, volleyball courts and the Malibu Pier. The City of Malibu’s park system is comprised of six parks including neighborhood, community, and wilderness parks.1 The City of Malibu maintains and owns over 500 acres of parkland, including the Charmlee Wilderness Park (532 acres).2 Table 3.12-1, City of Malibu Parks, list the parks which are owned and/or operated by the City, the acreage of each park, and the amenities which are offered at each site. In addition, the Santa Monica/Malibu Unified School District operates several schools within the City. The facilities at each school site are available for use by local residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological and Conference Opinion on the Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program, Arizona, California, and Nevada
    United States Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 Phoenix, Arizona 85021-4951 Telephone: (602) 242-0210 FAX: (602) 242-2513 In Reply Refer To: AESO/SE 02-21-04-F-0161 March 4, 2005 Memorandum To: Regional Director, Southwest Region, Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, New Mexico (ARD-ES) Regional Director, Lower Colorado Region, Bureau of Reclamation, Boulder City, Nevada (LC1200 ENV-1.10) From: Field Supervisor Subject: Biological and Conference Opinion on the Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program, Arizona, California, and Nevada This memorandum constitutes the attached biological and conference opinion (BCO) for the Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program (LCR MSCP). This BCO addresses the effects to 27 species for which six Federal agencies and 24 Permit Applicants from Arizona, California, and Nevada requested incidental take coverage under section 7 and section 10 of the Endangered Species Act. The BCO determined that the proposed actions described herein are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of listed, candidate, or other covered species, and are not likely to destroy or adversely modify designated or proposed critical habitat. Because this document is lengthy with many sections, we have provided a table of contents to assist in locating specific areas of the BCO. The official signature page for this BCO is located after the Reinitiation Notice on page 138. We appreciate the efforts of the staff at the Bureau of Reclamation and the Southwest Regional Office of the Fish and Wildlife Service in preparing this document. If there are any questions concerning this BCO, please contact Jeff Whitney, Lesley Fitzpatrick, or me.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Programmatic Environmental Assessment
    Final Programmatic Environmental Assessment Quarry Operations –Yuma Area Office Lower Colorado River Region U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Yuma Area Office Yuma, Arizona August 2007 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Final Programmatic Environmental Assessment Quarry Operations – Yuma Area Office Lower Colorado River Region prepared by Yuma Area Office Resource Management Office Environmental Planning and Compliance Group Jason Associates Corporation Yuma Office Contract No. 03-PE-34-0230 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Yuma Area Office Yuma, Arizona August 2007 Acronyms and Abbreviations ADEQ Arizona Department of Environmental Quality APCD Air Pollution Control District AQMD Air Quality Management District BCO Biological and Conference Opinion BMPs Best Management Practices BLM U.S. Bureau of Land Management CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards CARB California Air Resources Board CESA California Endangered Species Act CFR Code of Federal Regulations CO Carbon monoxide CRFWLS Colorado River Front Work and Levee System CRIT Colorado River Indian Tribes DM Departmental Manual DTSC Department
    [Show full text]
  • Missing Person" Incidents Since 2013
    "Missing Person" Incidents Since 2013 Involvement Incident# IncidentTime ParkAlpha Summary CaseStatus On February 20, 2012 at approximately 2009hours, Supervisory Ranger Hnat received a report from dispatch in reference to overdue fisherman (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) . On February 21, 2012, Ranger Austin and I initiated a Search and Rescue to include the use of NPS fixed wing plane. Subsequently the missing persons were located by BLM fire crew, and were transported safely to Mesquite, NV. By: Missing person NP12001104 02/20/2012 20:09 MST LAKE Ranger S. Neel Closed - Found/rescued REF LM2012030142 - LAKE - ***JUVENILE SENSITIVE INFORMATION*** - Lake Mead Interagency Dispatch Center received a call from a parent stating that her juvenile son had not returned home and was possibly in the Boulder Beach Campground. Ranger Knierman and I located the individual at campsite #67 at 2341 hours. The juvenile was reunited with his Missing person NP12001373 03/04/2012 22:37 MST LAKE mother shortly thereafter. All units were clear at 0014 hours. Closed - Incident only GOLD BRANCH, LOST MALE/FOUND NO INJURIES, FORWARD, 12- Missing person; Visitor NP12001490 03/03/2012 19:30 MST CHAT 0273 Closed - Incident only Missing person; Victim NP12001537 03/09/2012 13:20 MST PORE Search, Estero Trail area, Closed - Found/rescued Page 1 of 170 "Missing Person" Incidents Since 2013 Involvement Incident# IncidentTime ParkAlpha Summary CaseStatus On March 11th 2012 at approximately 1730 hours Ranger Ruff and I were dispatched to find two people who were missing from a larger group of people near Placer Cove. Ruff and I arrived at approximately 1820 hours and found the group who contacted dispatch.
    [Show full text]