DOCSLIB.ORG

SWUTC/11/473700-00076-1 the Potential for Improving Rail

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SWUTC/11/473700-00076-1 the Potential for Improving Rail Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. SWUTC/11/473700-00076-1 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date The Potential for Improving Rail International Intermodal Services in June 2011 Texas and the Southwest Region of the United States 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Robert Harrison (CTR) and James R. Blaze (Harsco) Report 473700-00076-1 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research University of Texas at Austin 11. Contract or Grant No. 1616 Guadalupe Street DTRS99-G-0006 Austin, TX 78701 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Southwest Region University Transportation Center Texas Transportation Institute Texas A&M University System 14. Sponsoring Agency Code College Station, Texas 77843-3135 15. Supplementary Notes Supported by a grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation, University Transportation Centers Program. 16. Abstract The report covers a period of great significance for railroading in the U.S as it contains a number of milestones now shaping the future performance of the industry. The specific subject is improving intermodal service so that it can support state and regional highway planning, now facing severe financial cut-backs as revenue sources become fully committed to bond servicing, user taxes, loose purchasing power and fuel consumption begins to fall. Intermodal traffic grew strongly in the period 1995 – 2007 and UP and BNSF trans-continental routes were improved largely on the back of intermodal demand. Alliances with larger trucking companies strengthened and transportation officials began to ask whether rail could take some of the predicted freight off key highway corridors. This report addresses elements of this question, more especially as it relates to intermodal traffic in Texas and the Southwest. The report comprises the following sections. Chapter 2 considers the changes in rail freight since the Staggers Act, Chapter 3 evaluates Class 1 intermodal service, and Chapter 4 identifies the major trade corridors serving Texas and the Southern region of the U.S. Chapter 5 describes rail bottlenecks on the state rail system that might impact future intermodal growth, and Chapter 6 concludes by examining the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats to rail intermodal service in Texas and the Southern region over the next decade. 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement Freight rail, Intermodal, Texas Rail Investment, No restrictions. This document is available to the Multimodal Planning public through NTIS: National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, Virginia 22161 19. Security Classif.(of this report) 20. Security Classif.(of this page) 21. No. of Pages 22. Price Unclassified Unclassified 78 Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized ii THE POTENTIAL FOR IMPROVING RAIL INTERNATIONAL INTERMODAL SERVICES IN TEXAS AND THE SOUTHWEST REGION OF THE UNITED STATES ROBERT HARRISON AND JAMES BLAZE RESEARCH REPORT SWUTC/11/473700-00076-1 SOUTHWEST REGION UNIVERSITY TRANSPORTATION CENTER CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN AUSTIN, TX 78701 JUNE 2011 iv Abstract The report covers a period of great significance for railroading in the U.S as it contains a number of milestones now shaping the future performance of the industry. The specific subject is improving intermodal service so that it can support state and regional highway planning, now facing severe financial cut-backs as revenue sources become fully committed to bond servicing, user taxes, loose purchasing power and fuel consumption begins to fall. Intermodal traffic grew strongly in the period 1995 – 2007 and UP and BNSF trans-continental routes were improved largely on the back of intermodal demand. Alliances with larger trucking companies strengthened and transportation officials began to ask whether rail could take some of the predicted freight off key highway corridors. This report addresses elements of this question, more especially as it relates to intermodal traffic in Texas and the Southwest. The report comprises the following sections. Chapter 2 considers the changes in rail freight since the Staggers Act, Chapter 3 evaluates Class 1 intermodal service, and Chapter 4 identifies the major trade corridors serving Texas and the Southern region of the U.S. Chapter 5 describes rail bottlenecks on the state rail system that might impact future intermodal growth, and Chapter 6 concludes by examining the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats to rail intermodal service in Texas and the Southern region over the next decade. v vi Executive Summary ES.1 Background The report covers a period of great significance for U.S railroading as it contains a number of milestones which will shape the future performance of the industry. The specific focus of the study is improving intermodal service so that it can further strengthen state and regional multimodal planning, since new highway capacity faces severe financial cut-backs as revenue sources become fully committed to bond servicing, the user taxes1 loose purchasing power and fuel consumption begins to fall2. Intermodal traffic grew strongly in the period 1995 – 2007 and UP and BNSF trans-continental routes were improved largely on the back of intermodal demand. Alliances with larger trucking companies strengthened3 and transportation officials began to ask whether rail could take some of the predicted freight off key highway corridors. A summary of the most significant milestones forming the economic and operating environment of U.S railroads between 2006 and 2010 is are follows: 1. Increasing profitability from a variety of successful market segments (not simply intermodal) and strategies to control and cut costs enables companies to meet their cost of capital. 2. Fuel efficiencies enable the sector to be considered by logistics companies over a variety of truck-competitive routes. 3. Cambridge Systematics completed a report on the U.S rail system4 which estimated the improvements needed on that part of the rail network predicted to carry most of the U.S rail traffic to 20355. Class 1 railroad companies were allocated $ $135 billion over this period and it was calculated that they could fund around $ 96 billion from operations leaving a shortfall of $ 39 million or $ 1.4 billion per year6. The study recommended that a national strategy by formed to support increased rail capacity sourced from a variety of financial instruments and beneficiaries. The figure of $ 1.4 billion annually for creating a system that could carry double the 2005 traffic volumes seems quite modest, especially given the magnitude of the last federal initiative to stimulate the economy. 1 Principally state and federal fuel taxes and registration fees 2 Total state consumption fell between 2007 and 2009 from 16.3 to 15.8 billion gallons of gasoline and diesel 3 Reducing adversarial relations related to truck size and weight legislation 4 “National Rail Freight Infrastructure Capacity and Investment Study” sponsored by the Association of American Railroads, September 2007 5 The figure was estimated by the U.S DOT and represents an increase of about 90 percent over the 2005 rail figure. 6 http://www.camsys.com/pubs/AAR_Nat_%20Rail_Cap_Study.pdf vii 4. In December 2009, Warren Buffet’s investment company Berkshire Hathaway which already had around a 21 percent stake in BNSF reached an agreement to purchase the remaining stock for $ 26.67 million, taking his total investment to $ 34 billion8. Buffet called it “an all-in wager on the economic future of the United States. I love those bets.” This important vote of confidence by arguably one of the most respected financial leaders sealed the transition of U.S Class 1 railroad company success and relevance in the national transportation system. Independent of fluctuations in the economy impacting demand, operating efficiencies and financial returns, two major issues remain that critically affect railroad operations. These are: 1. Re-regulation which has generated several policy initiatives including an STB restructuring the regulatory process and a rail anti-trust exemption revocation bill. 2. Providing access to passenger rail services on freight networks. This is highly problematic to the major companies who have spent two decades of investment on move freight on long unit trains at speeds up to 65 mph. Amtrak operations have shown the difficulty of moving passenger trains on schedule across freight systems even with the full support on Class 1 dispatchers. The opportunity of implement high speed rail (HSR) systems but only with limited funding has encourages HSR proponents to advocate the use of sections of the freight rail system or right-of-way has created concerns centering on reducing freight reliability, liability issues related to mixed HSR and freight use, freight rail subsidies to HSR operations and forced passenger rail access. The safety issues are highly relevant and it is interesting to note that, across the globe, when rail carried large volumes of both freight and passengers the system was separated9. ES.2 Recommendations for Improving Rail Service in Texas The first decade of the 21 century was one of great change, significance and success for the U.S rail industry. Rail now has an opportunity to grow its share of Texas freight, whether it is linked to U.S domestic markets, international imports and exports, or state transits on key corridors. Improving rail share is critical for Texas in a variety of ways, from improved emissions per ton mile to providing congestion relief at critical highway system bottlenecks. The study reports the following suggestions to remedy current rail 7 This represented $ 100 per Ordinary share. 8 http://www.camsys.com/pubs/AAR_Nat_%20Rail_Cap_Study.pdf 9 It is also worth noting that UP ran into trouble maintaining a trans-con double- driver truck competitive service for UPS and had to abandon the service after numerous freight trains were delayed while waiting in sidings for the faster train to pass.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • American Racer
    HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD American Racer HAER No. CA-346 Location: Suisun Bay Reserve Fleet; Benicia vicinity; Solano County, California Type of Craft: General cargo liner Trade: Break-bulk cargo carrying in subsidized liner service MARAD Design No.: C4-S-64a Hull No.: 629 (builder); MA-147 (MARAD) Official Registry No.: 297001 IMO No.: 6414069 Principal Measurements: Length (bp): 507’-7” Length (oa): 544’ Beam (molded): 75’ Draft (molded): 27’ Depth (molded, to Main Deck) 42’-6” Displacement: 20,809 long tons Deadweight: 13,264 long tons Gross registered tonnage: 11,250 Net registered tonnage: 6,716 Maximum continuous shaft horsepower: 18,750 Service speed: 21 knots (The listed dimensions are as-built, but it should be noted that draft, displacement, and tonnages are subject to alteration over time as well as variations in measurement.) Propulsion: Single-screw steam turbine Dates of Construction: Keel laying: June 18, 1963 Launching: May 13, 1964 Delivery: November 12, 1964 Designer: Friede and Goldman, Inc., Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, New Orleans, Louisiana Builder: Sun Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co., Chester, Pennsylvania Original Owner: United States Lines Company Present Owner: Maritime Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Disposition: Laid up in the National Defense Reserve Fleet American Racer HAER No. CA‐346 Page 2 Significance: The American Racer is a cargo ship designed to carry general, refrigerated, and liquid freight in express ocean service. Propelled by steam turbines geared to a single screw, the ship features one of the earliest engine-automation systems installed aboard an America vessel. This system permits direct control of engine speed from the wheel house and centralized control and monitoring of the propulsion plant and other mechanical systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Background, Trends, Issues, and Opportunities in Healthcare
    Background, Trends, Issues, and Opportunities In Healthcare Backgrounds, Trends, Issues and Opportunities in Healthcare TR-107833-R1 Final Report, September 1999 EPRI Project Manager J. Bauch EPRI • 3412 Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto, California 94304 • PO Box 10412, Palo Alto, California 94303 USA 800.313.3774 • 650.855.2121 • [email protected] • www.epri.com DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITIES THIS PACKAGE WAS PREPARED BY THE ORGANIZATION(S) NAMED BELOW AS AN ACCOUNT OF WORK SPONSORED OR COSPONSORED BY THE ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. (EPRI). NEITHER EPRI, ANY MEMBER OF EPRI, ANY COSPONSOR, THE ORGANIZATION(S) NAMED BELOW, NOR ANY PERSON ACTING ON BEHALF OF ANY OF THEM: (A) MAKES ANY WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION WHATSOEVER, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, (I) WITH RESPECT TO THE USE OF ANY INFORMATION, APPARATUS, METHOD, PROCESS, OR SIMILAR ITEM DISCLOSED IN THIS PACKAGE, INCLUDING MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR (II) THAT SUCH USE DOES NOT INFRINGE ON OR INTERFERE WITH PRIVATELY OWNED RIGHTS, INCLUDING ANY PARTY'S INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, OR (III) THAT THIS PACKAGE IS SUITABLE TO ANY PARTICULAR USER'S CIRCUMSTANCE; OR (B) ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING ANY CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF EPRI OR ANY EPRI REPRESENTATIVE HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES) RESULTING FROM YOUR SELECTION OR USE OF THIS PACKAGE OR ANY INFORMATION, APPARATUS, METHOD, PROCESS, OR SIMILAR ITEM DISCLOSED IN THIS PACKAGE. ORGANIZATION(S) THAT PREPARED THIS PACKAGE EPRI Healthcare Initiative ORDERING INFORMATION Requests for copies of this package should be directed to the EPRI Distribution Center, 207 Coggins Drive, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Intermodal Industry
    Intermodal Industry Overview - History of Containers and Intermodal Industry - Intermodal Operations - Chassis and Chassis Pools TRAC Intermodal Investor Relations 1 Strictly Private and Confidential Index Page • History of Containers and Intermodal Industry 4 • Intermodal Operations 13 • Chassis and Chassis Pools 36 2 Strictly Private and Confidential What is Intermodal? • Intermodal freight transportation involves the movement of goods using multiple modes of transportation - rail, ship, and truck. Freight is loaded in an intermodal container which enables movement across the various modes, reduces cargo handling, improves security and reduces freight damage and loss. 3 Strictly Private and Confidential Overview HISTORY OF CONTAINERS AND INTERMODAL INDUSTRY 4 Strictly Private and Confidential Containerization Changed the Intermodal Industry • Intermodal Timeline: – By Hand - beginning of time – Pallets • started in 1940’s during the war to move cargo more quickly with less handlers required – Containerization: Marine • First container ship built in 1955, 58 containers plus regular cargo • Marine containers became standard in U.S. in 1960s (Malcom McLean 1956 – Sea Land, SS Ideal X, 800 TEUs) • Different sizes in use, McLean used 35’ • 20/40/45 standardized sizes for Marine 5 Strictly Private and Confidential Containerization Changed the Intermodal Industry • Intermodal Timeline: – Containerization: Domestic Railroads • Earliest containers were for bulk – coal, sand, grains, etc. – 1800’s • Piggy backing was introduced in the early 1950’s
    [Show full text]
  • THE CONTAINERSHIP the REVOLUTION Specialized Vessels Have Been Developed to Accom- Modate This Trade
    THE INTERMODAL CONTAINER ERA THE CONTAINERSHIP REVOLUTION Malcom McLean’s 1956 Innovation Goes Global BRIAN J. CUDAHY P HOTO : M AERSK L INE , L TD . rowsing through a general-purpose book- Just about everything else—from boxes of crayons The author is a transpor- shop section on “Transport by Sea” would to crates of cereal, television sets to garden tools, tation and maritime lead to titles on the stately passenger liners model railroad trains to baseball gloves, men’s shirts historian whose books of yesteryear, old-fashioned paddle-wheel to women’s shoes—travels across the sea from factory include the recent Box Bsteamboats, luxury cruise ships, and warships of every to market aboard fleets of huge containerships. These Boats, as well as Around shape and size. Few, if any, volumes would cover the vessels have played a critical role in allowing the Manhattan Island: And seagoing merchant vessels that exercise enormous world’s economy to assume global dimensions. Other Maritime Tales of influence on the national economy—cargo ships. New York and A Overseas trade has assumed unimaginable pro- A Vision Takes Shape Century of Subways: portions in the past half century. Although some To understand how and why the modern container- Celebrating 100 Years commodities are transported most readily by air, and ship evolved, turn back the calendar to Thanksgiving of New York’s some high-value cargo such as software can travel week in the prewar year of 1937. The owner of a Underground Railways. from continent to continent electronically, the great small trucking firm in North Carolina had ventured He is a director of the 2006 TR NEWS 246 SEPTEMBER–OCTOBER bulk of world trade is carried across the seven seas north to New York harbor with bales of export cotton Steamship Historical by cargo ships.
    [Show full text]
  • HHH Collections Management Database V8.0
    AMERICAN RACER HAER CA-346 Suisun Bay Reserve Fleet HAER CA-346 Benicia vicinity Solano County California PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA REDUCED COPIES OF MEASURED DRAWINGS HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, DC 20240-0001 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD American Racer HAER No. CA-346 Location: Suisun Bay Reserve Fleet; Benicia vicinity; Solano County, California Type of Craft: General cargo liner Trade: Break-bulk cargo carrying in subsidized liner service MARAD Design No.: C4-S-64a Hull No.: 629 (builder); MA-147 (MARAD) Official Registry No.: 297001 IMO No.: 6414069 Principal Measurements: Length (bp): 507’-7” Length (oa): 544’ Beam (molded): 75’ Draft (molded): 27’ Depth (molded, to Main Deck) 42’-6” Displacement: 20,809 long tons Deadweight: 13,264 long tons Gross registered tonnage: 11,250 Net registered tonnage: 6,716 Maximum continuous shaft horsepower: 18,750 Service speed: 21 knots (The listed dimensions are as-built, but it should be noted that draft, displacement, and tonnages are subject to alteration over time as well as variations in measurement.) Propulsion: Single-screw steam turbine Dates of Construction: Keel laying: June 18, 1963 Launching: May 13, 1964 Delivery: November 12, 1964 Designer: Friede and Goldman, Inc., Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, New Orleans, Louisiana Builder: Sun Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co., Chester, Pennsylvania Original Owner: United States Lines Company Present Owner: Maritime Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Disposition: Laid up in the National Defense Reserve Fleet American Racer HAER No. CA‐346 Page 2 Significance: The American Racer is a cargo ship designed to carry general, refrigerated, and liquid freight in express ocean service.
    [Show full text]
  • The Containerized Shipping Industry and the Phenomenon of Containers Lost at Sea
    Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series ONMS-14-07 The Containerized Shipping Industry and the Phenomenon of Containers Lost at Sea U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service Office of National Marine Sanctuaries March 2014 About the Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series The Office of National Marine Sanctuaries, part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, serves as the trustee for a system of 14 marine protected areas encompassing more than 170,000 square miles of ocean and Great Lakes waters. The 13 national marine sanctuaries and one marine national monument within the National Marine Sanctuary System represent areas of America’s ocean and Great Lakes environment that are of special national significance. Within their waters, giant humpback whales breed and calve their young, coral colonies flourish, and shipwrecks tell stories of our maritime history. Habitats include beautiful coral reefs, lush kelp forests, whale migrations corridors, spectacular deep-sea canyons, and underwater archaeological sites. These special places also provide homes to thousands of unique or endangered species and are important to America’s cultural heritage. Sites range in size from one square mile to almost 140,000 square miles and serve as natural classrooms, cherished recreational spots, and are home to valuable commercial industries. Because of considerable differences in settings, resources, and threats, each marine sanctuary has a tailored management plan. Conservation, education, research, monitoring and enforcement programs vary accordingly. The integration of these programs is fundamental to marine protected area management. The Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series reflects and supports this integration by providing a forum for publication and discussion of the complex issues currently facing the sanctuary system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shipping Container and the Globalization of American Infrastructure by Matthew W. Heins
    The Shipping Container and the Globalization of American Infrastructure by Matthew W. Heins A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Architecture) in the University of Michigan 2013 Doctoral Committee: Professor Robert L. Fishman, Chair Associate Professor Scott D. Campbell Professor Paul N. Edwards Associate Professor Claire A. Zimmerman © Matthew W. Heins 2013 Acknowledgments I wish to express my sincere and heartfelt thanks to my advisor, professor Robert Fishman, who has provided such valuable guidance and advice to me over the years. Ever since I arrived at the University of Michigan, Robert has been of tremendous assistance, and he has played a vital role in my evolution as a student and scholar. My deepest gratitude also goes out to the other members of my dissertation committee, professors Claire Zimmerman, Scott Campbell and Paul Edwards, who have all given invaluable help to me in countless ways. In addition I would like to thank professor Martin Murray, who has been very supportive and whose comments and ideas have been enriching. Other faculty members here at the University of Michigan who have helped or befriended me in one way or another, and to whom I owe thanks, include Kit McCullough, Matthew Lassiter, Carol Jacobsen, Melissa Harris, María Arquero de Alarcón, June Manning Thomas, Malcolm McCullough, Jean Wineman, Geoffrey Thün, Roy Strickland, Amy Kulper, Lucas Kirkpatrick and Gavin Shatkin. My fellow doctoral students in architecture and urban planning at Taubman College have helped me immensely over the years, as I have benefited greatly from their companionship and intellectual presence.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 2 /2016
    ISSUE 2 /2016 1 THIS ISSUE INDEX Expoalimentaria 2016 24 The Life of a Banana 34-36 by Ivo Ravelli In the Picture 4-8 PMA Fresh Summit 25 Prince of Waves REGULARS StreamLines Photo 28-29 Thinking inside the Box 9-14 Competition 2016 Management Corner 3 by Howard Posner by Mareike Hilbig Clippings 26-27 Juice Summit 29 Port of Tauranga 15 Crow’s Nest 37 Annual Fishing Competition by Tim Evans Seatrade Newbuilding 30 Puzzle Page 38 Programmes Update Namegiving Ceremonies 16-17 by Chief Engineer Keesjan Keus, Fleetlist 39 for Seatrade Orange and Captain Rob Schenkeveld, Bert de Seatrade Red Boer & Jarek Cisek by Mareike Hilbig Blue Stream Trade 32 MLDP 2/ HEISS 18-22 Agency Meeting by Gerald Munjanganja Maiden USA Port Call 23 for Seatrade Red No Boring Ocean VieW 33 COLOFON Ideas, comments and input can be sent to: The information contained in this Seatrade Reefer Chartering N.V. magazine is intended solely for the use Editorial Team Attn.: Editorial Team “Simply Seatrade” of the individual or entity to whom it Mareike Hilbig, Fiona Schimmel, Yntze Atlantic House (4th f.), is addressed and others authorised to Buitenwerf, Philip Gray, Pieter Hartog, Noorderlaan 147 receive it. If you are not the intended Howard Posner and Kor Wormmeester 2030 Antwerp recipient you are hereby notifed that any Belgium disclosure, copying, distribution or taking Layout and Creation Phone (32) 3 544 9493 action in reliance of the contents of this Drukkerij Steylaerts E-mail [email protected] information is strictly prohibited and may Website www.seatrade.com · Antwerp be unlawful.
    [Show full text]
  • 50 Lucrative Lucre … a Ratings to Riches Story
    THE MAGAZINE OF THE WORLD’S SHIPMANAGEMENT COMMUNITY ISSUE 4 NOV/DEC 2006 COVER STORY 50 Lucrative Lucre … a ratings to riches story Are Filipino Captains really earning four times the salary of their Prime Minister and if so, how is this new found wealth affecting their lives? 6 STRAIGHT TALK SHIPMANAGEMENT FEATURES NOTEBOOK 16 How I Work SMI talks to two industry 9 Pedersen swaps Thome for 13 Executive stress achievers and asks the question: How do you keep TESMA Wasting office time! up with the rigours of the Svein Pedersen has joined Eitzen shipping industry? 16 Maritime Services as President for 13 Dot com EMS Ship Management intrigue 21 Training for the on the P&I front task ahead 10 V.Ships to triple seafarer pool Insurers remain As Chief Executive Officer of non-plussed V.Ships’ Shipmanagement Company unveils plans to boost crew 16 numbers to 60,000 over P&I division, Bob Bishop is charged with steering an industry internet-based juggernaut. He spoke to Sean 10 Phew! What a relief! alternative Moloney about the challenges Professionalism and operational integrity ahead is alive and well in the V.Ships camp even 13 Suez Canal to expand if it does means losing an owners' fleet Egypt is planning to spend $1bn to expand 24 On My Mind 21 the Suez Canal by 2010, but analysts are Ole Stene is Managing 11 No ‘free lunch’ for IMO questioning its economic viability Director of Aboitiz Jebsen Bulk Transport Corporation The bunkering industry has reacted angrily 14 Box vessel calls top the rest and Chief Operating Officer to IMO’s decision to phase out residual of Jebsen Management AS.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Global Container Shipping Market César Ducruet, Hidekazu Itoh
    Introduction to global container shipping market César Ducruet, Hidekazu Itoh To cite this version: César Ducruet, Hidekazu Itoh. Introduction to global container shipping market. Global Logistics Network Modelling and Policy. Quantification and Analysis for International Freight, Elsevier, pp.3- 30, 2021, 10.1016/B978-0-12-814060-4.00001-0. halshs-02995835 HAL Id: halshs-02995835 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02995835 Submitted on 22 Dec 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Introduction to Global Container Shipping Market César Ducruet, CNRS Hidekazu Itoh, Kwansei Gakuin University In: Shibasaki R., Kato H., Ducruet C. (Eds.) (2020) Global Logistics Network Modelling and Policy. Quantification and Analysis for International Freight, Elsevier, pp. 3-30. 1. Introduction: Containerization and global logistics In 26th April, 1956, an American land transporter named Malcom McLean started competing with freight railway companies on inter-state long distance transport in the US. He first navigated a hopped-up container ship from Newark, New Jersey, to Houston, Texas, along the US East Coast by his shipping company (later named Sea-Land). Maritime containers were acquired for two main purposes: 1) to reduce port handling costs by unitization (container “box”) of cargo and 2) to reduce truck transport cost on long-distance delivery.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Sea Shipping As Global and Regional Industry Leslie Miller University of Rhode Island
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Senior Honors Projects Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island 2006 An Analysis Of Sea Shipping As Global And Regional Industry Leslie Miller University of Rhode Island Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog Part of the Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, and the International Business Commons Recommended Citation Miller, Leslie, "An Analysis Of Sea Shipping As Global And Regional Industry" (2006). Senior Honors Projects. Paper 4. http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/4http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/srhonorsprog/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at the University of Rhode Island at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LESLIE MILLER AN ANALYSIS OF SEA SHIPPING AS GLOBAL AND REGIONAL INDUSTRY ABSTRACT: SEE PAGE 3 KEYWORDS: SHIPPING, CONTAINERIZATION, PORT, STANDARDIZATION, MECHANIZATION, TRANSPORTATION, COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT, ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS, PANAMA CANAL ADVISOR: PROFESSOR JOHN DUNN MAJOR: BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AUTHOR E-MAIL: [email protected] AN ANALYSIS OF SEA SHIPPING AS GLOBAL AND REGIONAL INDUSTRY SPRING SEMESTER 2006 URI HONORS PROGRAM BY: LESLIE MILLER FACULTY SPONSOR: PROFESSOR JOHN DUNN, COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 2 ABSTRACT: AN ANALYSIS OF SEA SHIPPING AS GLOBAL AND REGIONAL INDUSTRY LESLIE MILLER FACULTY SPONSOR: PROFESSOR JOHN DUNN, COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION Our hectic world is one filled with constant change through motion: the movement of ideas, political thought, money, people, and cargo all coming together to create an economy of global scale and activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Container Shipping and the Decline of New York, 1955-1975
    Marc Levinson Container Shipping and the Decline of New York, 1955-1975 The introduction of container shipping in the late 1950s and early 1960s has received little attention from historians, but it represents a major technological advance with significant eco­ nomic consequences. By dramatically lowering the cost of freight handling, the container reduced the need for factories to be near suppliers and markets and opened the way for manufacturing to move out of urban centers, first domesti­ cally and then abroad. This impact was particularly intense in New York City, where the container revolution began. Con­ tainerization had a devastating impact on New York City's economy, and was a major contributor to the collapse of its industrial base between 1967 and 1975. n April 1956, a World War II tanker named the Ideal-X set sail from I Newark, New Jersey, with fifty-eight metal truck trailers held in frames bolted to its deck. Six days later, the ship steamed into Houston and off-loaded the containers, to be hauled away by waiting trucks. That brief voyage began an era of dramatic change in the business of handling cargo-and a reshaping of New York City's economy. The container represented a radical advance in transportation. It has not received the historical attention given the steamship, the canal, the railroad, and other technologies that brought economic transfor­ mation in their wakes. Yet the consequences of the container were con­ siderable, and they are still being felt. Before containerization, inter­ national trade was an extremely expensive process: crating, insuring, transporting, loading, unloading, and storing goods being exported often cost 25 percent or more of the value of the goods.
    [Show full text]