Arxiv:1710.04700V2 [Quant-Ph] 4 Dec 2017 Two Decades, Many Experiments Have Observed the Opti- Tor
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Radiation-Pressure-Mediated Control of an Optomechanical Cavity Jonathan Cripe,1 Nancy Aggarwal,2 Robinjeet Singh,1 Robert Lanza,2 Adam Libson,2 Min Jet Yap,3 Garrett D. Cole,4, 5 David E. McClelland,3 Nergis Mavalvala,2 and Thomas Corbitt1, ∗ 1Department of Physics & Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70808 2LIGO - Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 3Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia 4Vienna Center for Quantum Science and Technology (VCQ), Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria 5Crystalline Mirror Solutions LLC and GmbH, Santa Barbara, CA, and Vienna, Austria (Dated: December 5, 2017) We describe and demonstrate a method to control a detuned movable-mirror Fabry-P´erotcavity using radiation pressure in the presence of a strong optical spring. At frequencies below the optical spring resonance, self-locking of the cavity is achieved intrinsically by the optomechanical (OM) interaction between the cavity field and the movable end mirror. The OM interaction results in a high rigidity and reduced susceptibility of the mirror to external forces. However, due to a finite delay time in the cavity, this enhanced rigidity is accompanied by an anti-damping force, which destabilizes the cavity. The cavity is stabilized by applying external feedback in a frequency band around the optical spring resonance. The error signal is sensed in the amplitude quadrature of the transmitted beam with a photodetector. An amplitude modulator in the input path to the cavity modulates the light intensity to provide the stabilizing radiation pressure force. I. INTRODUCTION [32, 33]. Signal-recycling and signal-extraction cavities have been used in the GEO 600 [34] and Advanced LIGO Cavity optomechanics, the interaction between electro- [35] gravitational wave detectors, and are planned to be magnetic radiation and mechanical motion, provides an used in Advanced VIRGO [36], and KAGRA [37]. ideal platform for measuring mechanical displacements For a blue-detuned high-finesse optomechanical Fabry- and preparing and detecting mechanical resonators in the P´erotcavity in which the cavity's resonance frequency is quantum regime [1]. In a simple cavity-coupled optome- less than the laser frequency, the system's effective me- chanical system, the mechanical oscillator is driven by chanical resonance frequency is shifted to a higher fre- the radiation pressure force exerted by the probing laser quency than the mechanical oscillator's eigenfrequency field. The fluctuations in the radiation pressure force via the addition of the optical spring constant. This due to power fluctuations modulate the motion of the leads to self-stabilization of the optomechanical system mechanical oscillator, effectively changing the length of at frequencies below the optical spring frequency [38]. the cavity and modifying the resonance condition of the At the optical spring frequency, however, the lag in opti- cavity. This leads to changes in the optical power cir- cal response due to the round trip optical delay leads to a culating inside the cavity, thus cyclically modulating the dominating anti-damping force that renders the system radiation pressure force exerted on the mechanical oscil- unstable [8, 9, 39]. Such anti-damping forces normally lator. This feedback results in the optical spring effect. require active feedback control to stabilize the optome- The optical spring effect was first discussed for Fabry- chanical dynamics [8, 39]. Perot cavities by Braginsky [2, 3]. Braginsky et al. [4], Conventionally, detuned cavities are locked by using a Buonanno and Chen [5], and Harms et al. [6] proposed simple \side of fringe" locking method. In this method using the optical bar and optical spring to enhance the the error signal is obtained from the slope of the cavity sensitivity of gravitational wave detectors. Over the past intensity profile on a transmission/reflection photodetec- arXiv:1710.04700v2 [quant-ph] 4 Dec 2017 two decades, many experiments have observed the opti- tor. This error signal is filtered and fed back to a piezo- cal spring in a variety of systems [1, 7{16] and used it electric actuator on the cavity mirror or to the frequency to optically cool mechanical resonators [17{25]. Further- of the laser. The lock bandwidth is limited by the piezo- more, proposals to increase the sensitivity of Michelson- electric device's mechanical resonance frequency. The type gravitational wave detectors using the optical spring laser frequency modulation on the other hand has more effect have included adding a signal-recycling cavity [26{ bandwidth, but requires a large actuation range for short 28], using a detuned cavity to amplify the interferomet- length cavities. As an alternative, in previous experi- ric signal [29], adding a signal-extraction cavity or reso- ments, we have demonstrated the stabilization of the op- nant sideband extraction [30, 31], and dynamically tun- tomechanical cavity by utilizing the double optical spring ing the cavities to follow a gravitational wave chirp signal effect [16]. In this paper, we introduce a new feedback control method to lock a movable mirror Fabry-P´erotcavity us- ing radiation pressure. We have implemented this scheme ∗ [email protected] at two independent experiments at LSU and MIT. This 2 duces a force into a displacement. The optical cavity, in turn, transduces the displacement back into a radia- High Pass P PD tion pressure force, forming a closed loop. For simplicity, we consider the frequency dependent susceptibility of a Servo Amp single mechanical resonance at Ωm, such that 1 χ = ; (1) L m 2 2 m (Ωm − Ω + iΩΓm) AM Laser In where Ω is frequency, m is the effective mass of the mode of oscillation, Γm = Ωm=Qm with Γm and Qm the me- chanical damping and quality factor of the mechanical oscillator, respectively. [40]. The open-loop gain pertaining to the cavity's closed- 140 μm loop response as shown in Fig. 2 may be given in the limit Ω γ as [41] FIG. 1. Schematic of the experimental setup. The laser is passed through an amplitude modulator (AM), which mod- 32πχmPcav δγ 2iΩ Gos = − 2 1 − 2 ulates the intensity of the field before entering the detuned cλ0T (1 + δγ ) γ(1 + δγ ) optomechanical cavity. The light is detected in transmission 2iΩ of the cavity and passed through a high pass filter and servo = −χmK0 1 − 2 controller containing a gain and low pass filter component to γ[1 + δγ ] obtain the error signal which is fed back to the AM. The inset 2 = −mχm Ω − iΓosΩ ; shows the scale of the moveable mirror that forms one of the os 2 cavity mirrors. Ωos ΓosΩ = 2 2 1 − i 2 (2) (Ωm − Ω + iΩΓm) Ωos scheme relies on the suppression of external disturbances where Pcav is the intra-cavity power, λo is the center by having a large in-loop optomechanical gain as a re- wavelength of the laser, c is the speed of light, T is sult of the large optical spring constant. This suppres- the total fraction of light leaving the cavity via loss and sion, which is mediated via the radiation pressure force, mirror transmissions, γ is the half width at half maxi- lowers the fluctuations in cavity length and power. A mum (HWHM) for the cavity optical resonance in rad/s, δ = δ = !L−!C is the dimensionless detuning of the schematic representation of the method is shown in Fig. γ γ γ 1, where the error signal is derived from the transmit- laser field from the cavity's resonance, and K0 is the opti- ted power out of the cavity and is used to control the cal spring constant. The optical spring frequency is given 2 2 2 radiation pressure force acting on the cavity by modulat- by mΩos = K0, and its HWHM is Γos = 2Ωos/γ=(1+δγ ). ing the intensity of the input laser field passing through The real part of Eq. 2 corresponds to a position depen- an amplitude modulator (AM). An optimal error signal dent restoring force and the imaginary part corresponds is extracted by passing the transmitted field through a to a velocity dependent anti-damping force [42]. filter. This filter comprises of a gain and a band-pass The effective susceptibility of the system to a force is component. The gain and low-pass filter of the servo then controller are to stabilize the anti damping on the optical x χm χos = = spring. The high-pass filter is to avoid saturation of the Fext 1 + Gos AM actuator due to ambient/seismic fluctuations that 1 1 ≈ ; (3) are largest at low frequencies (below a few kHz for a typ- 2 2 m Ω − Ω − iΓosΩ ical lab environment). These seismically and acoustically os driven fluctuations in cavity length are self-stabilized in where x is the displacement of the resonator, Fext, is an the optomechanical dynamics due to the high OM gain external force, and in the last step we assume that the at frequencies below optical spring. Ωos Ωm and Γos Γm. At frequencies below the optical spring frequency the ambient motion is therefore reduced by the factor II. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK 2 χm Ωos ≈ 2 2 ; (4) χos Ω − Ω + iΩΓm In understanding the noise stabilization of a strong op- m tical spring system with feedback, it is informative to with the approximation assuming Ωos Ω. This factor view the optical spring itself as a feedback mechanism. of suppression may be made very large if Ωos Ωm. In this view, a closed-loop feedback system is formed be- In the limit of a large optical spring frequency, the tween the mechanical oscillator and the optical cavity. optical spring provides sufficient stabilization to maintain The mechanical oscillator, with susceptibility χm, trans- cavity lock. Due to the negative damping (gain) of the 3 optical spring feedback, however, the system is unstable on its own.