Correlations Between Multiple Tracers of the Cosmic Web Arxiv
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Declaration Type of Award: Doctor of Philosophy School: Physical Sciences and Computing I declare that while registered as a candidate for the research degree, I have not been a registered candidate or enrolled student for another award of the University or other academic or professional institution. I declare that no material contained in the thesis has been used in any other sub- mission for an academic award and is solely my own work. No proof-reading service was used in the compilation of this thesis. Tracey Friday September 2020 ii \I was, am and will be enlightened instantaneously with the Universe." - Keizan Zenji \People can come up with statistics to prove anything, Kent. 40% of people know that!" - Homer Simpson iii Abstract The large-scale structure of the Universe is a `cosmic web' of interconnected clusters, filaments, and sheets of matter. This work comprises two complementary projects investigating the cosmic web using correlations between three different tracers: the cosmic microwave background (CMB), supernovae (SNe), and large quasar groups (LQGs). In the first project we re-analyse the apparent correlation between CMB temperature and SNe redshift reported by Yershov, Orlov and Raikov. In the second we investigate for the first time whether LQGs exhibit coherent alignment. Project 1: The cosmic web leaves a detectable imprint on CMB temperature. Evidence presented by Yershov, Orlov and Raikov showed that the WMAP/Planck CMB pixel-temperatures at supernovae (SNe) locations tend to increase with in- creasing redshift. They suggest this could be caused by the Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect and/or by residual foreground contamination. We assess the correlation independently using Planck 2015 SMICA R2.01 data and, following Yershov et al., a sample of 2,783 SNe from the Sternberg Astronomical Institute. Our analysis supports the prima facie existence of the correlation but attributes it to a composite selection bias caused by the chance alignment of seven deep survey fields with CMB hotspots. These seven fields contain 9.2% of the SNe sample (256 SNe). Spearman's rank-order correlation coefficient indicates the correlation present in the whole sample (p-value = 6:7 10−9) is insignificant for × a sub-sample of the seven fields together (p-value = 0:2) and entirely absent for the remainder of the SNe (p-value = 0:6). We demonstrate the temperature and iv redshift biases of these deep fields, and estimate the likelihood of their falling on CMB hotspots by chance is 6:8% 8:9% (approximately 1 in 11 15). We show ∼ − − that a sample of 7,880 SNe from the Open Supernova Catalogue exhibits the same effect, and conclude that it is an accidental but not unlikely selection bias. Project 2: The cosmic web influences structure formation and evolution; galaxy and quasar spins correlate with their host large-scale structures. We investigate for the first time whether the LQGs hosting the quasars themselves exhibit coher- ent alignment. We use the position angle (PA) of 71 LQGs in the redshift range 1:0 z 1:8 as the tracer here. We find that their PAs do not follow a random ≤ ≤ distribution (p-values 0:008 . p . 0:07). Their distribution is bimodal with modes at the centre of the A1 region of θ¯ 52 2◦; 137 3◦. The median location of the ∼ ± ± modes at all 71 LQG locations is θ¯ 45 2◦; 136 2◦. We find that the LQG PAs ∼ ± ± are correlated, specifically aligned and orthogonal, with a maximum significance of 0:8% (2:4σ) at typical angular (comoving) separations of 30◦ ( 1:6 Gpc). ' ∼ ∼ This finding suggests an explanation for the Gpc-scale coherent orientation of quasar polarization, first reported by Hutsem´ekers in 1998, and since widely studied. Our results are remarkably close to the radio polarization angles of θ¯ 42◦; 131◦ ' reported by Pelgrims and Hutsem´ekers. The origin of these correlations is still an open question, but is often attributed to quasars' intrinsic alignment. More recently, evidence has emerged that quasar polarization vectors are preferentially parallel and orthogonal to LQG axes. Our results integrate these two findings. The statistical significance of our results is marginal, and we cannot exclude the LQG correlation being a chance anomaly. However, spatial coincidence between our LQG sample and regions of quasar polarization alignment, and the similarity between LQG PAs and radio polarization angles, suggest an interesting result. The tendency of LQGs to be either aligned or orthogonal warrants further investigation, and we suggest future work to evaluate this intriguing correlation further. v Contents Declaration ii Abstract iv Acknowledgements xiv Abbreviations xv 1 Introduction 1 1.1 The large-scale structure of the Universe: the `cosmic web' . .2 1.1.1 Galaxies align with their host large-scale structure . .4 1.1.2 Quasars align with their host large-scale structure . .6 1.1.3 Large quasar groups (LQGs) . 11 1.2 The cosmic microwave background . 12 1.2.1 LSS imprints on CMB temperature . 17 1.3 Summary and thesis structure . 19 2 Accidental deep field bias in CMB T and SNe z correlation 23 2.1 Abstract . 23 2.2 Introduction . 24 2.3 Data and methods . 26 2.3.1 SNe and CMB data . 26 vi 2.3.2 Methods . 28 2.4 Results: deep field bias . 32 2.4.1 Identification of fields . 32 2.4.2 Contribution to correlation . 35 2.4.3 Temperature and redshift . 38 2.4.4 Likelihood . 44 2.5 Results: alternative data . 47 2.5.1 SNe types . 47 2.5.2 SNe catalogues . 48 2.5.3 Planck CMB maps . 52 2.6 Discussion and conclusions . 53 3 Data and methods to detect LQGs and analyse their morphology 55 3.1 Cosmography and cosmological parameters . 55 3.1.1 Calculation of comoving positions . 56 3.2 Detecting large quasar groups . 57 3.2.1 Large quasar group finder . 57 3.2.2 Large quasar group sample . 59 3.3 Determining large quasar group orientation . 63 3.3.1 Axial position angle data . 65 3.3.2 Position angle uncertainties . 66 3.3.3 Evaluation of 2D and 3D position angle approaches . 70 3.3.4 Position angle confidence weighting . 73 3.4 Coordinate invariance: parallel transport . 74 3.4.1 Parallel transport method . 76 3.4.2 Parallel transport variants . 77 3.5 Summary and conclusions . 78 vii 4 Methods for the statistical analysis of LQG position angles 81 4.1 Uniformity tests . 82 4.1.1 Kuiper's test . 82 4.1.2 Hermans-Rasson test . 84 4.1.3 χ2 test . 85 4.2 Bimodality tests . 86 4.2.1 Bimodality coefficient . 87 4.2.2 Hartigans' dip statistic . 88 4.3 Correlation tests . 91 4.3.1 S test . 91 4.3.2 Z test . 93 4.4 Applying the S test to LQG orientations . 95 4.4.1 Nearest neighbours free parameter . 95 4.4.2 S statistic distribution . 96 4.4.3 Effect of parallel transport . 98 4.4.4 Numerical simulations . 101 4.5 Mock LQG catalogues . 103 4.6 Discussion and conclusions . 105 4.6.1 Test availability and appropriateness . 106 5 Evidence for large-scale correlation of LQG orientations 109 5.1 Results: LQG position angles . 110 5.1.1 LQG PAs as a function of redshift . 117 5.1.2 LQG PA weights . 120 5.1.3 LQG morphology . 122 5.2 Results: statistical analysis . 124 5.2.1 Uniformity: LQG PAs are unlikely to be uniform . 124 5.2.2 Bimodality: LQG PA distribution is bimodal . 128 viii 5.2.3 Correlation: LQG PAs are aligned and orthogonal . 133 5.3 Discussion and conclusions . 139 6 Discussion 141 6.1 General data and methods contributions . 141 6.2 CMB T and SNe z correlation is due to bias . 143 6.2.1 Potential CMB and LQG correlations . 145 6.3 Large-scale correlation of LQG orientations . 146 6.3.1 Summary of methods evaluation and results . 148 6.3.2 Origin of LQG orientation correlation . 151 7 Conclusions and future work 155 A Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect 175 B Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect 177 C Planck CMB temperature for SNe deep fields 1-7 179 D CMB T and SNe z correlation: variances and smoothing 181 E CMB T and SNe z correlation: alternative Planck maps 185 F Calculating comoving distance 189 G Large quasar group position angles 191 H Large quasar groups in three-dimensional comoving space 195 I A Voronoi tessellated Universe 199 ix List of Tables 1.1 Regions of quasar optical polarization alignment . .9 1.2 Regions of quasar radio polarization alignment . .9 2.1 SNe fields identified in the Sternberg Astronomical Institute sample . 33 2.2 Gradient and Spearman's correlation coefficient for SAI sub-samples . 36 2.3 CMB T and SNe z distributions for SNe sub-samples . 41 2.4 Results of Welch's t-test and MWU test of CMB T and SNe z .... 43 2.5 Number and proportion of SNIa within sub-samples . 48 2.6 Number of SNe within fields identified in SAI and OSC sub-samples . 49 2.7 Gradient and Spearman's correlation coefficient for OSC sub-samples 50 5.1 Large quasar group locations and position angles (example LQGs) . 116 5.2 Results of uniformity tests (χ2, Kuiper's, Hermans-Rasson) . 125 5.3 Results of uniformity tests applied to mock LQGs . 127 5.4 Bimodality coefficient for different bin widths (see also Fig. 5.12) . 129 5.5 Skewness and kurtosis of Fig. 5.12 used to calculate the BC . 129 E.1 As Table 2.3 but for Commander, NILC, SEVEM, and SMICA maps 186 G.1 Large quasar group locations and position angles (full LQG sample) .