TOWN OF EAST HAMPTON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAY 6TH, 2005 East Hampton Town Board William McGintee, Supervisor Debra Brodie Foster, Councilwoman Pat Mansir, Councilwoman Pete Hammerle, Councilman Job Potter, Councilman Lynn Ryan, Executive Assistant Kathy McCormack, Executive Secretary Prepared By: Lisa Liquori, President, Fine Arts & Sciences, LLC Irene Nagle, AICP The Planning Department Marguerite Wolffsohn, Director JoAnne Pahwul, Assistant Director Thomas Talmage, Town Engineer Theresa Goergen, Environmental Planner Tara Burke, Senior Planner Joel Halsey, Environmental Planner Brian Frank, Chief Environmental Analyst Robert Zimmerman, Planner Christian Granelli, Student Intern Michael Volk, Student Intern Nancy Metz, Planning Aide Comprehensive Plan Assistant: Gail P. Ficeto, Administrative Assistant Comprehensive Plan Mapping: Ronn Pirrelli, Cartographer The Housing Department Thomas Ruhle, Director Katy Casey, Administrative Assistant Dana Walker, Community Relations Assistant The Natural Resources Department Larry Penny, Director Lisa D’Andrea, Assistant Director Robert Masin, Environment Analyst Special Counsel: Fred Thiele Town Attorney Laura Molinari, Town Attorney John Jilnicki, Deputy Town Attorney Denise Schoen, Assistant Town Attorney Tiffany Scarlato, Assistant Town Attorney Elizabeth Baldwin, Assistant Town Attorney Robert Pease, Database Manager Cover Photos: JoAnne Pahwul, Joel Halsey, Rameshwar Das & Gail Ficeto INDEX OF TABLES: ______________________________________________________ TABLE TITLE PAGE Table 1 Population Growth 1990-2000 14 East Hampton Town Table 2 Estimate Peak Seasonal Population, 2000 15 Town of East Hampton Table 3 Housing Units 1990-2000 19 East Hampton Town Table 4 Housing Units, Households and Seasonal 20 Housing By School District Table 5 Housing and Population Density 2000 21 By School District Table 6 Income and Poverty Rate in 22 East Hampton 1999 Table 7 Employment Status of Civilian Population 24 16 years and over In Town of East Hampton 2000 Table 8 Town Wide Land Use 27 Table 9 Comparison of Land Use between 27 1984 and 2003 Table 10 Wainscott Land Use 28 Table 11 East Hampton Land Use 30 Table 12 Amagansett Land Use 33 Table 13 Springs Land Use 34 Table 14 Montauk Land Use 35 Table 15 Number of Vacant Residential Lots 41 Within the Town of East Hampton v ______________________________________________________ TABLE TITLE PAGE Table 16 Number of Potential Units from Divisible 42 Vacant Parcels (Excluding UR Maps) Table 17 Total Number of Potential Units 42 Table 18 Housing - East Hampton Town 44 Table 19 Residential Build-out Within Urban 64 Renewal Maps Table 20 Amagansett UR Maps 65 Table 21 Wainscott UR Maps 66 Table 22 Montauk UR Maps 66 Table 23 Springs UR Maps 66 Table 24 East Hampton UR Maps 67 Table 25 Wainscott Proposed Zoning 122 B 1 – B 22 Table 26 East Hampton Proposed Zoning 143 C 1 – C 28 Table 27 Amagansett Proposed Zoning 158 B 1 – B 17 Table 28 Springs Proposed Zoning 173 B 1 – B 23 Table 29 Montauk Proposed Zoning 185 C 1 – C17 vi INDEX OF MAPS: ______________________________________________________ MAP NUMBER T ITLE PAGE Map # 1 Town of East Hampton Existing Land 28 A Use – Wainscott School District Map # 2 Town of East Hampton Existing Land 31 A Use – East Hampton School District (Excluding Incorporated Village) Map # 3 Town of East Hampton Existing Land 32 A Use – Amagansett School District Map # 4 Town of East Hampton Existing Land 34 A Use – Springs School District Map # 5 Town of East Hampton Existing Land 36 A Use – Montauk School District Map “A” Proposed Seasonal Employee Housing Overlay 53 A District MAP “B” Proposed Seasonal Employee Housing Overlay 53 B District MAP “C” Town of East Hampton Amend UR Plan Map 77 A Map # 6 Town of East Hampton Groundwater 103 A Protection Zones – West Section Map # 7 Town of East Hampton Groundwater 103 B Protection Zones – East Section Map # 8 Town of East Hampton Proposed Zoning 122 A Wainscott School District Map # 9 Town of East Hampton Proposed Zoning 143 A East Hampton School District (Excluding Incorporated Village) Map # 10 Town of East Hampton Proposed Zoning 143 B East Hampton School District – Detail A vii ______________________________________________________ MAP NUMBER T ITLE PAGE Map # 11 Town of East Hampton Proposed Zoning 158 A Amagansett School District Map # 12 Town of East Hampton Proposed Zoning 173 A Springs School District (Excluding for Gardiners Island Depicted on Montauk Map) Map # 13 Town of East Hampton Proposed Zoning 185 A Montauk School District and Gardiners Island Map # 14 Town of East Hampton Proposed Zoning 185 B Montauk School District – Detail B viii INTRODUCTION Need for a New Comprehensive Plan Between 1990 and 2000, East Hampton was the fastest growing Town in Suffolk County and subsequent growth trends give reason to project this high growth rate into the future. Under present zoning, the number of dwellings existing in 2004 in East Hampton Town can increase by 33% and the year-round population by almost 50%. Accompanying this high amount and rate of residential growth have been pressures on East Hampton’s roads, schools, infrastructure in general, and the environment. Growth in traffic and school age population has increased at a greater rate than the population and number of new households. Growth in traffic compared to houses, for example increases at a ten to one ratio. In other words, for every new house, there is projected to be ten new car trips on the roads every day1. Whereas Town-wide population in East Hampton increased by 22% between 1990 and 2000, enrollment in the East Hampton School District increased by 61%2 during this same time frame. Many studies document the fact that most residential development burdens the community with more expenses than the taxes it generates. Merely comparing the average 2004 East Hampton homeowner tax bill of approximately $5,000 to the 2004 East Hampton School District “per pupil expense” of $19,916 3 shows how every new house with one or more school-aged children is a tax burden to the community. Bear in mind that approximately 58.5% of each tax bill in the East Hampton School District covers non-school expenses associated with County, Fire Districts, Town and other services4. Despite this high growth rate and the associated costs of development, East Hampton has the second lowest tax rate as a percentage of median value of real estate in all of Long Island. Only Shelter Island has lower than the 1.1% tax rate as a percent of median real estate value of East Hampton5. Three factors contribute to this low tax rate: a large number of second home owners (54 % according to Census 2000), a large percentage of seniors (approximately 20% are 65 or older according to US 2000 Census), and a high percentage (40%) of preserved open space and farmland. Second homeowners and seniors generally do not send children to school; farmland and protected open space require even fewer services and do not send children to school. While the age and seasonal composition of the Town are not factors that the Town controls, the desirability of the community as a second home and retirement area are affected by Town programs. The quality and quantity of the Town’s protected open space contributes greatly to the natural beauty and the desirability of East Hampton Town. East Hampton’s natural and cultural resources have regional, statewide, national and even international significance. While East Hampton’s long history of successful open space 1 From the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) figures 2 East Hampton Union Free School District Figures 3 East Hampton Union Free School Figures 4 Personal conversation with Roy Fedelem, Suffolk County Planning Department. 5 Suffolk County Planning Department, Long Island Towns and Cities by Median Home Value and Median Taxes-2000 Report. 1 preservation is expected to continue, it is unlikely that all of the remaining land with important natural and cultural features meriting protection will be acquired. In order to assess these changing conditions, to protect what is so special about East Hampton, and to prevent deterioration in living conditions and the natural environment, an updated comprehensive land use plan and zoning map has been prepared. This Town of East Hampton Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map sets forth recommendations to reduce impacts to the Town’s groundwater resources, natural resources (other than groundwater), scenic resources, historic and pre-historic resources and existing character. While protecting these features, the Plan will also help to reduce over-all residential build-out, which also will reduce ultimate impacts on the Town’s roadways, schools, and infrastructure in general. Adopting the revised zoning is a necessary pre-requisite for determining revised potential build-out and the need for community services and infrastructure. It is anticipated that further planning and evaluation of the Town’s community and infrastructure needs will be conducted immediately following the adoption of this Town of East Hampton Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map. Subjects to be addressed include Transportation, Recreation, Infrastructure, Commercial Needs, Hamlet Studies and other topics identified in the Recommendations to Meet the Goals Section of this Plan. This further work may be considered Phase II of the Town of East Hampton Comprehensive Plan Update. The last full overhaul of the East Hampton Town Comprehensive Plan was conducted and adopted in 1984, with 21 updates and amendments made during the intervening 20 years. All of these plans, as well as other documents have been reviewed in the preparation of this Comprehensive Plan and are listed as references. The following five plans which have previously been adopted as elements of the Town of East Hampton Comprehensive Plan, are incorporated by reference in their entirety, are summarized in the appendix, and will remain in effect as Components of this Town of East Hampton Comprehensive Plan, May 2005: Historic Preservation Report, Town of East Hampton, Phase One and Phase Two, 1989 and 1990, prepared by Robert Hefner Town of East Hampton Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element, 1997, prepared by L.K.