Independent Review Group Review of the Effectiveness and Efficiency of HEFCE

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Independent Review Group Review of the Effectiveness and Efficiency of HEFCE March 2010/07 This report sets out the findings of an Issues paper independent effectiveness and efficiency review of the Higher Education Funding Council for England. Independent Review Group review of the effectiveness and efficiency of HEFCE Final report Oakleigh Consulting Limited Suite 626 Sunlight House Quay Street Manchester M3 3JZ Tel: 0161 835 4100 Email:[email protected] www.oakleigh.co.uk 1 Contents 1. Executive summary ........................................................................................... 6 1.1. Key findings ................................................................................................ 6 1.2. HEFCE’s value proposition ......................................................................... 7 1.3. Performance, people and stakeholders ....................................................... 8 1.4. Evidence of effectiveness ............................................................................ 8 1.5. HEFCE’s four key functions ...................................................................... 10 1.6. Assessing efficiency .................................................................................. 12 1.7. Conclusion ................................................................................................ 13 2. Schedule of recommendations ........................................................................ 15 3. Background to this study ................................................................................. 17 4. The organisation and its people ....................................................................... 18 4.1. Function and strategic aims ...................................................................... 18 4.2. The Board ................................................................................................. 19 4.3. Chief Executive’s Group ............................................................................ 22 4.4. Structure, people and culture .................................................................... 24 4.5. Conclusion ................................................................................................ 30 5. Stakeholder relations ....................................................................................... 31 5.1. Relationships with HEIs............................................................................. 31 5.2. Relationships with non-HEIs ..................................................................... 34 5.3. Conclusion ................................................................................................ 37 6. Assessing HEFCE’s efficiency ......................................................................... 38 6.1. Underlying efficiency ................................................................................. 38 6.2. Benchmarking efficiency ........................................................................... 38 6.3. Procurement ............................................................................................. 40 6.4. Conclusion ................................................................................................ 41 7. Assessing HEFCE’s effectiveness ................................................................... 42 8. Policy development and advice to government and others .............................. 44 8.1. Learning and teaching ............................................................................... 44 2 8.2. Widening participation and fair access ...................................................... 44 8.3. Research .................................................................................................. 45 8.4. Employer engagement and skills ............................................................... 46 8.5. Economy and society ................................................................................ 48 8.6. Other areas of work ................................................................................... 49 8.7. Conclusion ................................................................................................ 51 9. Administration of funding and implementation of public policy initiatives .......... 52 9.1. Teaching funding....................................................................................... 52 9.2. Research funding ...................................................................................... 53 9.3. Other funding ............................................................................................ 53 9.4. Data collection processes ......................................................................... 54 9.5. Conclusion ................................................................................................ 55 10. Regulation of the HE sector and accountability for public funding .................... 56 10.1. Regulatory burden ................................................................................. 56 10.2. Assurance and institutional risk ............................................................. 56 10.3. Assurance and institutional risk service ................................................. 58 10.4. Evolution in assurance practice ............................................................. 59 10.5. Conclusion ............................................................................................. 63 11. Related bodies ................................................................................................ 65 11.1. Remit and purpose ................................................................................ 65 11.2. Oversight framework.............................................................................. 67 11.3. VFM of related bodies ............................................................................ 69 11.4. Conclusion ............................................................................................. 70 12. Promotion of good practice within higher education institutions ....................... 71 12.1. Key funds .............................................................................................. 71 12.2. Supporting good practice ....................................................................... 72 12.3. Conclusion ............................................................................................. 73 13. Facing the future; the Higher Education Framework and other challenges ...... 74 13.1. Introduction ............................................................................................ 74 13.2. ‘Higher Ambitions’ – The Higher Education Framework ......................... 74 3 13.3. Independent review of HE funding and student finance ......................... 75 13.4. Conclusion ............................................................................................. 76 Appendix A. Terms of reference ......................................................................... 77 Appendix B. Consultees ..................................................................................... 80 Appendix C. Source documents .......................................................................... 90 Appendix D. Common abbreviations ................................................................... 93 Appendix E. Picturing HEFCE’s role ................................................................... 94 Appendix F. The Board....................................................................................... 97 Appendix G. Staffing ........................................................................................... 98 Appendix H. The commercial banks.................................................................. 105 Appendix I. Non-HEI stakeholders .................................................................. 108 Appendix J. Policy case studies ....................................................................... 112 Case study 1: Strategically Important and Vulnerable Subjects ............................. 113 Case study 2: Higher Education Innovation Fund .................................................. 115 Case study 3: Economic Challenge Investment Fund ............................................ 119 Case study 4: The Research Excellence Framework ............................................ 121 Case study 5: Human resource management in higher education ......................... 124 Appendix K. Higher Ambitions; possible impact on HEFCE operations ............. 126 4 List of figures Figure 1 Comparative data on running costs 2008-09 ......................................... 39 Figure 2 Assurance service resources ................................................................. 59 Figure 3 HEFCE’s related bodies ........................................................................ 66 Figure 4 HEFCE’s related bodies – schedule of independent reviews ................. 68 Figure 5 Members of Review Group and consultancy team ................................. 79 Figure 6 Consultees to the review – HEFCE staff ................................................ 80 Figure 7 Consultees to review – HEFCE’s Board and past members .................. 82 Figure 8 Consultees to review – mission groups .................................................. 82 Figure 9 Consultees to review – Non-HEIs .......................................................... 83 Figure 10 Consultees to review – HEIs .............................................................. 87 Figure 11 Outcome Relationship Map
Recommended publications
  • Albertian Professors
    The list of Albertian Professors Some Albertians who have been elevated to the rank of Professor, or Associate Professor or Adjunct and visiting Professors (with a known full academic year) are listed below. A few have held other appointments of the same rank. In most cases the position is the current one, or the one held at the time of retirement. Some listed professors are deceased. If an academic moved into administration the last known teaching position is given. Some professors have or had named chairs; these are not given here. Institutions are fully named. If you can add to this list please notify Brian Murphy at [email protected] Where liberty has arisen, learning must be cherished – or liberty itself becomes a fragile thing. Lyndon B Johnson • T.J. (Trevor) Bagust, of Population Health, University of Georgia. • M.E.R. (Michael) Bassett, of History, University of Western Ontario. • A. J. C. (Andy) Begg, of Education, Auckland University of Technology. • D.R (David) Bell, of Marketing, University of Pennslyvania. • J. A. W. (Jack) Bennett, of Medieval and Renaissance English, University of Cambridge. • B. J. (Bruce) Biggs, of Anthropology, The University of Auckland. • J.B. (John) Blennerhasset, of Pathology, University of Otago. • R.D. (Raymond) Bradley, of Philosophy, The University of Auckland. • R.N. (Nick) Brothers, of Geology, The University of Auckland. • D. A. (David) Brown, of Geology, Australian National University. • R.H. (Harvey) Brown, of Community Dental Health, University of Otago. • S. C. (John) Burns, of Mathematics, Royal Military College, Duntroon. • G.T. (Tim) Burnstein, of Materials Chemistry and Corrosion, University of Cambridge.
    [Show full text]
  • View This Issue (425.6KB)
    fst journal The Journal of the Foundation for Science and Technology (formerly Technology Innovation and Society) Volume 18, Number 2, December 2003 Special report The Lambert Review Horizon scanning Sir David King: Scientific roots Dr Geoff Mulgan: Techniques Dr William C Harris: Foresight predicates commitment Science & creativity The Lord Puttnam: An amalgam of cultures Julian Anderson: Innovation in music David Hughes: From innovation to production Dr Robert Hawley: Creativity in teamwork Science curriculum Dr Ken Boston: The vocational divide Professor John Holman: Science for everyone Sue Flanagan: A teacher’s perspective Creating Eden Tim Smit: Realising a dream THE FOUNDATION FOR SCIENCE AND fst TECHNOLOGY THE FOUNDATION The Foundation for Science and FOR SCIENCE AND Technology TECHNOLOGY 10 Carlton House Terrace fst London SW1Y 5AH Telephone THE FOUNDATION FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 020 7321 2220 Registered Charity No: 274727. A Company Limited by Guarantee No: 1327814 Fax 020 7321 2221 VICE PRESIDENTS The Earl of Shannon e-mail The Lord Flowers FRS [email protected] Dr Richard J Haas CBE LLD Hon ScD The Earl of Selborne KBE FRS Sir Brian Jenkins GBE Editor Viscount Runciman of Doxford CBE PBA Sir John Maddox FRS Sub-editors COUNCIL Charles Wenz, Trish Dent CHAIRMAN The Rt Hon the Lord Jenkin of Roding Production & Layout James McQuat The President of the Royal Society The Lord May of Oxford OM AC PRS FMedSci The President, The Royal Academy of Engineering Sir Alec Broers FRS FREng The President, The Academy of Medical
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Statement 2011-12
    Annual Report and Financial statements 2011–12 University of London Central Institutes and Activities Contents 3 Financial report 22 Corporate governance statement 24 Membership and responsibilities of the Board of Trustees 27 Statement of internal control 28 Independent auditor’s report to the Board of Trustees of the University of London 31 Statement of the University’s principal accounting policies 36 Consolidated income and expenditure account 37 Statement of consolidated total recognised gains and losses 38 Balance sheets 39 Consolidated cash flow statement 40 Notes to the financial statements 56 About us 2 ANNUAL REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2011–12 Financial report 31 July 2012 The University’s Strategic Plan covers the period 2009–14. • University of London Institute in Paris (ULIP) The plan identifies the strategic aims of the University as: • University Marine and Biological Station at 1 to maintain and enhance the academic excellence of Millport (UMBSM) the federal University; This core mission is complemented by Senate House 2 to deliver highly effective services to Colleges, offering Libraries (SHLs), whose eight libraries provide an excellent value for money; excellent research environment. All other central University departments, whether they deliver services 3 to ensure the financial sustainability of all internally or externally, help the University achieve this University operations; Strategic Aim by providing academic support and student, professional and technical services to an agreed 4 to fulfil the regional, national and international roles level of quality and contribution. of the University; and In relation to University of London awards, the University 5 the creation and retention of a workforce with the plays a role in assuring standards for those students necessary ethos, working practices and competences registered centrally and contributes towards the quality to deliver the Strategic Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2009–10
    ANNUAL REPORT 2009–10 SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY www.sas.ac.uk CONTENTS Dean’s foreword 2 The intellectual life of the School 3 Events 4 Fellowships 8 Formal networks and collaborations 10 Research 12 Publications 14 Teaching and quality 16 Research training 17 Libraries 18 Digital activities 19 Member Institutes and Consortium 20 Institute of Advanced Legal Studies 20 Institute of Classical Studies 22 Institute of Commonwealth Studies 24 Institute of English Studies 26 Institute of Germanic & Romance Studies 28 Institute of Historical Research 30 Institute of Musical Research 33 Institute of Philosophy 35 Institute for the Study of the Americas 38 Warburg Institute 40 Human Rights Consortium 42 Administration and finance 44 Dean’s Office 44 Registry 45 Marketing 46 Development 46 Research Services 47 Publications 47 Finance 48 Governance 49 Board of the School 49 Directorate 50 Committees 50 Central Services 51 Appendices 52 SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY ANNUAL REPORT 2009–10 I DEAN’S REPORT I DEAN’S REPORT Dean’s foreword The intellectual life of the School By the time I came into post in April 2010, the School of The School was founded 15 from guidance in archival the Institutes to sustain and Advanced Study had achieved a great many of the tasks it had years ago to protect, foster and library work, through the stimulate their research. set itself following the positive review of the School by the and develop advanced study critical appraisal of colleagues Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) in in the humanities and social at seminars, workshops and As a consequence, the 2007–08.
    [Show full text]
  • Albertian Professors
    The list of Albertian Professors Some Albertians who have been elevated to the rank of Professor, or Associate Professor or Adjunct and visiting Professors (with a known full academic year) are listed below. A few have held other appointments of the same rank. In most cases the position is the current one, or the one held at the time of retirement. Some listed professors are deceased. If an academic moved into administration the last known teaching position is given. Some professors have or had named chairs; these are not given here. Institutions are fully named. If you can add to this list please notify Brian Murphy at [email protected] Where liberty has arisen, learning must be cherished – or liberty itself becomes a fragile thing. Lyndon B Johnson • T.J. (Trevor) Bagust, of Population Health, University of Georgia. • M.E.R. (Michael) Bassett, of History, University of Western Ontario. • A. J. C. (Andy) Begg, of Education, Auckland University of Technology. • D.R (David) Bell, of Marketing, University of Pennslyvania. • J. A. W. (Jack) Bennett, of Medieval and Renaissance English, University of Cambridge. • B. J. (Bruce) Biggs, of Anthropology, The University of Auckland. • J.B. (John) Blennerhasset, of Pathology, University of Otago. • A.E. (Alan) Bollard, of Practice, Victoria University of Wellington. • R.D. (Raymond) Bradley, of Philosophy, The University of Auckland. • R.N. (Nick) Brothers, of Geology, The University of Auckland. • D. A. (David) Brown, of Geology, Australian National University. • R.H. (Harvey) Brown, of Community Dental Health, University of Otago. • I. G. (Ian) Buckle, of Engineering, The University of Nevada (Reno).
    [Show full text]
  • 10Th Proof Uol FS 13
    Annual Report and Financial Statements 2012–13 University of London Central Institutes and Activities The University of London is a federal organisation and is one of the oldest, largest and most diverse universities in the UK. It consists of 18 autonomous Colleges of outstanding reputation, together with a number of prestigious academic bodies based at Senate House.The latter are collectively known as the ‘School of Advanced Study’; together they serve and support both the interests of the Colleges and the broader achievements of UK higher education. With the central professional services they strive to enhance the academic excellence of the federal University and to deliver highly effective, value-added services to the Colleges, while at the same time ensuring the financial sustainability of all its operations. The University is an exempt charitable body in England, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336 Contents 2 Vice-Chancellor’s review 11 Chancellor’s engagements 14 Financial review 19 Corporate governance statement 21 Membership and responsibilities of the Board of Trustees 23 Statement of internal control by the Board of Trustees 24 Independent auditors’ report to the Board of Trustees of the University of London 25 Statement of the University’s principal accounting policies 29 Consolidated income and expenditure account 30 Statement of consolidated total recognised gains and losses 31 Balance sheets 32 Consolidated cash flow statement 33 Notes to the financial statements 55 About us Annual Report and Financial
    [Show full text]