Multicloud Infrastructure & Application Management

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Multicloud Infrastructure & Application Management Next reports Reports.InformationWeek.com November 2013 $99 Multicloud Infrastructure & Application Management As cloud services pile up, IT teams find themselves in a bind: How do we manage multiple vendors without wasting more money than we save by not owning and operating the infrastructure? By Kurt Marko Report ID: S7481113 Previous Next reports Multicloud Infrastructure & Application Management S 3 Author’s Bio ABOUT US 4 Executive Summary T 5 Cloudy With a Chance of Complexity InformationWeek Reports’ analysts arm business technology 5 Figure 1: Use of Cloud Computing Services decision-makers with real-world perspective based on qualitative 6 Cloud Management: What’s Coming and quantitative research, business and technology assessment and 6 Figure 2: Future Degree of Cloud Use planning tools, and adoption best practices gleaned from N 7 Figure 3: Number of Cloud Providers in Use experience. 8 Figure 4: Integrating Cloud Applications 9 Herding Clouds OUR STAFF E 9 Figure 5: Methods for Automating & Lorna Garey , content director; [email protected] Orchestrating Workloads on PaaS and IaaS Heather Vallis , managing editor, research; [email protected] T 10 Figure 6: Future Methods for Automating & Elizabeth Chodak , copy chief; [email protected] Orchestrating Workloads on PaaS and IaaS Tara DeFilippo , associate art director; [email protected] 10 Next Phase: Cloud Application Management 13 Recommendations Find all of our reports at reports.informationweek.com . N 13 Figure 7: Use of IT Automation Tools 14 Steps to Take TABLE OF 15 Related Reports O C reports.informationweek.com November 2013 2 Previous Next Table of Contents reports Multicloud Infrastructure & Application Management Kurt Marko is an InformationWeek and Network Computing contributor and IT industry veteran, pursuing his passion for communications after a varied career that has spanned virtually the entire high-tech food chain from chips to systems. Upon graduating from Stanford University Kurt Marko with a BS and MS in Electrical Engineering, Kurt spent several years as a semiconductor device InformationWeek Reports physicist, doing process design, modeling and testing. He then joined AT&T Bell Laboratories as a memory chip designer and CAD and simulation developer. Moving to Hewlett-Packard, Kurt started in the laser printer R&D lab doing electrophotogra - phy development, for which he earned a patent, but his love of computers eventually led him to join HP’s nascent technical IT group. He spent 15 years as an IT engineer and was a lead architect for several enterprisewide infrastructure projects at HP, including the Windows domain infra - structure, remote access service, Exchange e-mail infrastructure and managed Web services. Want More? Never Miss a Report! Follow Follow reports.informationweek.com © 2013 InformationWeek, Reproduction Prohibited November 2013 3 Previous Next Table of Contents reports Multicloud Infrastructure & Application Management Enterprise cloud adoption has evolved to the point where hybrid public/private cloud designs and use of multiple providers is common. But heterogeneity begets management complexity: Y Who among us has mastered provisioning resources in different clouds; allocating the right resources to each application; assigning applications to the “best” cloud provider based on performance or reliability requirements, cost, scalability or whatever your metric; and automating R management tasks using repeatable processes and standard configurations? Where there’s a pain point there’s a marketing op; in this case, for a new breed of cloud manage - ment platform. IT can choose among suites like CA Infrastructure Management or IBM Smart - Cloud Orchestrator and services, typically delivered in a SaaS model, including Enstratius (now A Dell Multi-Cloud Manager), HP CloudSystem, RightScale, ScaleXtreme and Scalr. Initially, multicloud products focused on infrastructure management — specifically, provision - ing cloud resources and deploying system images to the most appropriate target. However, the need goes deeper. Cloud users — enterprise IT, DevOps teams and application developers alike — M need end-to-end application life cycle management. Again, the software industry is responding. Many of the aforementioned cloud service management pioneers have expanded their feature lists to include more complete application management capabilities. They’re joined by next-gen cloud application life cycle and performance management systems from the likes of Cloudsoft, Elastic Box, Standing Cloud and even AWS itself via CloudFormation. These systems automate not M only provisioning but packaging, monitoring, load balancing, even auto scaling. In this report, we’ll examine the infrastructure and application management challenges of a EXECUTIVE multicloud environment, survey the technology landscape, and provide recommendations on how best to develop and implement a multicloud strategy by incorporating the right software U and IT processes. S reports.informationweek.com November 2013 4 Previous Next Table of Contents reports Multicloud Infrastructure & Application Management Cloudy With a Chance of Complexity Cloud is quintessential disruptive technol - gains are translating to sales, with Gartner es - and critical applications, not test and dev ogy, making up one-third of what CNBC’s Jim timating the global public cloud services mar - environments. Cramer calls the “Holy Trinity of Tech ”: mobile, ket will grow more than 18% this year, to $131 The cloud hasn’t displaced internal IT, but social, cloud. Years of accumulated enterprise billion, with IaaS notching the fastest rate of it’s chipping away. Even our survey of (not ex - resistance , fueled by a combination of protec - expansion at over 42%. And this growth is fu - actly unconflicted) IT pros finds 16% admit - tionism, security and performance FUD, and eled by use of cloud for production systems ting that half or more of their IT services will immature management software, are finally crumbling. Our data shows that enterprise IT Figure 1 has overcome skepticism and is expanding Use of Cloud Computing Services use of public clouds while pursuing conver - What are your organization’s plans for cloud computing? gence internally, too. 2013 2012 The latest InformationWeek State of Cloud We’re receiving services today from a cloud provider Computing Survey found that 40% of respon - 40% dents use cloud services, up seven points 33% since 2011, with an additional 13% planning We’re planning to use services from a cloud provider within the next 12 months 13% to do so by early next year. Only 20% of our re - 14% spondents have no plans to incorporate pub - We’re considering using services from a cloud provider lic cloud into their IT portfolios, down seven 27% points from 2011. Similarly, the Uptime Insti - 26% tute’s annual survey of 1,000 data center facil - We have no plans to use services from a cloud provider 20% ities operators found that 28% use public 27% cloud services, with large companies twice as Base: 446 respondents in February 2013 and 511 in December 2011 R6490213/1 likely as smaller ones to be adopters. These Data: InformationWeek State of Cloud Computing Survey of business technology professionals at organizations with 50 or more employees reports.informationweek.com November 2013 5 R Previous Next Table of Contents reports Multicloud Infrastructure & Application Management be delivered from the cloud in the next two Cloud Management: What’s Coming ware developed by the virtualization vendor, years. Furthermore, the vast majority, 79%, IT teams managing complex internal envi - whether VMware vCenter, Microsoft System employ multiple cloud providers, with an in - ronments that by now are almost uniformly Center or Citrix XenServer. The exception: trepid 13% using six or more. While we lump virtualized typically use management soft - Large enterprises with equally large fleets of into the mix software-as-a-service, used by half of our respondents, it’s clear that most Figure 2 organizations already have several infrastruc - FAST FACT Future Degree of Cloud Use ture- and platform-as-a-service products in Looking ahead 24 months, what percentage of your IT services do you predict will be delivered from the cloud? their IT portfolios. 2013 2012 40% The problem: knitting disparate services, 75% or more; “IT” is a four-letter word to us 5% of respondents use cloud with their own management APIs, service 4% catalogs and technology stacks, into your ex - services, up seven points 50% to 74%; if it can be outsourced, we’re looking to do it since 2011. isting IT infrastructure and to one another. 11% It’s not an easy task, which is no doubt why 11% one-third of our respondents don’t even 25% to 49%; our core business isn’t IT and we’re happy to use outside services 18% bother trying. Forty-one percent take the la - 18% borious, costly, error-prone path of custom- 10% to 24%; some tasks are better done by others coding scripts or application stubs around 35% each vendor’s API, to bridge internal and ex - 29% ternal systems. While this is obviously a 1% to 9%; very limited usage 26% nightmare for application developers, don’t 32% underestimate the challenge for IT teams try - None, we hate the cloud ing to manage a hybrid infrastructure and 5% deploy applications across multiple clouds 6% while guaranteeing service levels. Base: 446 respondents in February 2013 and 511 in December 2011 R6490213/18 Data: InformationWeek State of Cloud Computing Survey of business
Recommended publications
  • Update on Cloud Activities at LBNL
    Update on cloud activities at LBNL *Val Hendrix: [email protected], Doug Benjamin2: [email protected], Roberto Vitillo1: [email protected] 1Lawrence Berkeley National Lab 2Duke University 7/12/12 ADC Cloud Computing RnD Overview Overview ● Goal ● Progress ● Plans 7/12/12 ADC Cloud Computing RnD 2 Goal Goal ● Use Case: A site should be able to easily deploy new analysis cluster (batch, PROOF) in commercial or private cloud resources. https://twiki.cern. ch/twiki/bin/view/Atlas/CloudcomputingRnD#Use_Cases ● Solution: Elastic Data Analysis Cluster (E-DAC): a fully configured data analysis cluster that is elastic and deployable on multiple clouds. ● We have chosen Scalr Open Source as the cluster management tool we will use to deliver E-DAC 7/12/12 ADC Cloud Computing RnD 3 Progress Progress ● Scalr 3.5 release ● Scalr + Openstack ● ScalrEDAC 7/12/12 ADC Cloud Computing RnD 4 Progress Scalr 3.5 Released ● Scalr 3.5 Released June 13th ○ RAID over EBS – increased performance for EBS on EC2 ○ The two scalarizr repositories- time and control your updates ○ Scripts & Roles attachment – create your custom images ○ Role versioning – improved control ● This fixed a series of issues that were impeding the development of Condor Cluster roles ○ Custom metric scaling ○ Scalarizr agent bug: This blocked successfully running the Condor Cluster configuration scripts ● Openstack supported was promised for this release but unfortunately it is still not available 7/12/12 ADC Cloud Computing RnD 5 Progress Scalr + Openstack ● Scalr does not officially support Openstack yet (although they are trying) “We haven't gotten it to work (Essex) on our own servers, TryStack lacks Swift and Volumes, and every cluster that the community has lent us has been disappointingly buggy or incomplete.” Sebastian Stadil on scalr-discuss google group ● Scalr has a Eucalyptus interface, will that work for Openstack? ○ There’s more to adding support for a cloud than a simple API.
    [Show full text]
  • Google Is a Strong Performer in Enterprise Public Cloud Platforms Excerpted from the Forrester Wave™: Enterprise Public Cloud Platforms, Q4 2014 by John R
    FOR CIOS DECEMBER 29, 2014 Google Is A Strong Performer In Enterprise Public Cloud Platforms Excerpted From The Forrester Wave™: Enterprise Public Cloud Platforms, Q4 2014 by John R. Rymer and James Staten with Peter Burris, Christopher Mines, and Dominique Whittaker GOOGLE, NOW A FULL-SERVICE PLATFORM, IS RUNNING TO CATCH THE LEADERS Since our last analysis, Google has made significant improvements to its cloud platform — adding an IaaS service, innovated with new big data solutions (based on its homegrown dremel architecture), and added partners. Google is popular among web developers — we estimate that it has between 10,000 and 99,000 customers. But Google Cloud Platform lacks several key certifications, monitoring and security controls, and application services important to CIOs and provided by AWS and Microsoft.1 Google has also been slow to position its cloud platform as the home for applications that want to leverage the broad set of Google services such as Android, AdSense, Search, Maps, and so many other technologies. Look for that to be a key focus in 2015, and for a faster cadence of new features. Forrester Wave™: Enterprise Public Cloud Forrester Wave™: Enterprise Public Cloud Platforms For CIOs, Q4 ‘14 Platforms For Rapid Developers, Q4 ‘14 Risky Strong Risky Strong Bets Contenders Performers Leaders Bets Contenders Performers Leaders Strong Strong Amazon Web Services MIOsoft Microsoft Salesforce Cordys* Mendix MIOsoft Salesforce (Q2 2013) OutSystems OutSystems Google Mendix Acquia Current Rackspace* IBM Current offering (Q2 2013) offering Cordys* (Q2 2013) Engine Yard Acquia CenturyLink Google, with a Forrester score of 2.35, is a Strong Performer in this Dimension Data GoGrid Forrester Wave.
    [Show full text]
  • HP Datacenter Care - Datacenter Care for Cloud Datasheet Addendum HP Technology Services - Contractual Services
    Technical data HP Datacenter Care - Datacenter Care for Cloud datasheet addendum HP Technology Services - Contractual Services HP Datacenter Care for Cloud (DC4C) is a version of HP Datacenter Care developed to address the needs of complex private cloud and hybrid cloud environments built on the HP CloudSystem infrastructure and HP cloud management software. A primary feature of DC4C is its linkage to, and collaboration with, your HP Software Premier Support. Optional features and services can be added to DC4C to accommodate public cloud service providers, pay-per-use pricing, multivendor management, and more. Core features and options include the following: – Coordinates the sale, invoicing, and delivery of HP Datacenter Care and HP Software Premier Support for a simplified and unified experience across cloud infrastructure and cloud management software when purchased at the same time and under the same support coverage period – Joins together the Datacenter Care and Premier Support account teams and augments the deliverables they provide – Coordinates activities provided by Matrix Master technical experts when included in your DC4C Statement of Work – Can combine with Datacenter Care Flexible Capacity and Primary Service Provider capabilities – Offers a Hybrid Cloud Support (HCS) option to accommodate cloud service providers The features of HP Datacenter Care and Premier Support are fully described in their respective data sheets. This Datacenter Care for Cloud data sheet addendum highlights features or requirements that are different when the customer purchases these two services as a Datacenter Care for Cloud configuration, and highlights additional features or options that are of special interest in cloud environments. A mutually agreed-upon and executed Statement of Work will detail these additional features based upon your needs when you purchase Datacenter Care for Cloud along with your purchase of HP Software Premier Support.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Cloud Service Vendors with Comparison J.Jagadeesh Babu1 Mr.P.Saikiran 2 M.Tech Information Technology Dept of IT/LBRCE College India
    Volume 3, Issue 5, May 2013 ISSN: 2277 128X International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering Research Paper Available online at: www.ijarcsse.com Evaluating Cloud Service Vendors with Comparison J.Jagadeesh Babu1 Mr.P.Saikiran 2 M.Tech Information Technology Dept of IT/LBRCE college India. India. Abstract: In this paper we reviewed the technical and service aspects of different Cloud providers and presents the comparisons of these selected service offerings in cloud computing. By this User can have good understanding regarding services provided to avoid bottlenecks are also obstacles that could limit the growth. This comparison of cloud service providers, to serve as a starting point for user looking to take throw service and for Selecting the better one for there need into cloud environment . Keywords: Cloud Computing, Service Vendors, Cloud Services. I. Introduction As the use of computers in our day-to-day life has increased, the computing resources that we need also grown up. It was costly to buy a mainframe and computer‘s, it became important to find the alternative ways to get the greatest return on the investment, allowing multiple users to share among both the physical access to the computer from multiple terminals and to share the CPU time, eliminating periods of inactivity, which became known in the industry as time- sharing[1]. The origin of the term cloud computing is vague, but it appears to derive from the way of drawings of stylized clouds to denote networks in diagrams of computing and communications systems.Cloud computing is a paradigm shift in which computing is moved away from personal computers and even the individual enterprise application‘s to a ‗cloud‘ of computers.
    [Show full text]
  • Deliverable No. 5.3 Techniques to Build the Cloud Infrastructure Available to the Community
    Deliverable No. 5.3 Techniques to build the cloud infrastructure available to the community Grant Agreement No.: 600841 Deliverable No.: D5.3 Deliverable Name: Techniques to build the cloud infrastructure available to the community Contractual Submission Date: 31/03/2015 Actual Submission Date: 31/03/2015 Dissemination Level PU Public X PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) Grant Agreement no. 600841 D5.3 – Techniques to build the cloud infrastructure available to the community COVER AND CONTROL PAGE OF DOCUMENT Project Acronym: CHIC Project Full Name: Computational Horizons In Cancer (CHIC): Developing Meta- and Hyper-Multiscale Models and Repositories for In Silico Oncology Deliverable No.: D5.3 Document name: Techniques to build the cloud infrastructure available to the community Nature (R, P, D, O)1 R Dissemination Level (PU, PP, PU RE, CO)2 Version: 1.0 Actual Submission Date: 31/03/2015 Editor: Manolis Tsiknakis Institution: FORTH E-Mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: This deliverable reports on the technologies, techniques and configuration needed to install, configure, maintain and run a private cloud infrastructure for productive usage. KEYWORD LIST: Cloud infrastructure, OpenStack, Eucalyptus, CloudStack, VMware vSphere, virtualization, computation, storage, security, architecture. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no 600841. The author is solely responsible for its content, it does not represent the opinion of the European Community and the Community is not responsible for any use that might be made of data appearing therein.
    [Show full text]
  • Dell Openstack Cloud Solution
    Dell OpenStack Cloud Solution Peter Jung Senior Solutions Architect & Business Developer Fast. Easy. Now. Dell.com/OpenStack Dell.com/Crowbar Cloud expectations and promises Support the mobile & social marketplace Innovate and grow and workforce Anytime, anywhere, on any device access and Speed time to market when introducing new engagement. (BYOD) increases productivity and goods and services job satisfaction Apps Revenue Data “The Business” BI Cost Speed Efficiency Attract & retain new customers Reduce IT cost, deliver operational results On-demand, self-service and automated access Connect customer data, gain intelligence on lowers costs and decreases demands on IT customers to better target, nurture and solidify leads Cloud - Challenges for SP and Enterprise Service provider challenges Enterprise challenges • Cost-effectively scaling, and competing in the • Lack of infrastructure standardization and emerging public cloud ecosystem automation leading to poor resource utilization, cost escalation, slow application delivery • Ability to quickly launch new cloud services • Locked-in to proprietary vendors and • Keeping license costs down on traditional technologies – increasing license costs with virtualization solutions – costs increase linearly growth and scale with scale (often per node) • Poor understanding of cost allocations • Keeping maintenance costs down on home- grown components that have been built • Long resource provisioning cycle times haphazardly over time • Inflexible and non-adaptive infrastructure • Flexibility to rapidly add/change features in response to customer needs –commercial • Building a cloud is too complex and takes too solutions lack features they need long • Lack of availability and support of the entire end-to-end solution Cloud Taxonomy – Complex? Cloud service PaaS/SaaS management PaaS/SaaS services sit on top of this stack along with other any specific vertical solutions such as VDI, HPC, CDN etc.
    [Show full text]
  • D1.5 Final Business Models
    ITEA 2 Project 10014 EASI-CLOUDS - Extended Architecture and Service Infrastructure for Cloud-Aware Software Deliverable D1.5 – Final Business Models for EASI-CLOUDS Task 1.3: Business model(s) for the EASI-CLOUDS eco-system Editor: Atos, Gearshift Security public Version 1.0 Melanie Jekal, Alexander Krebs, Markku Authors Nurmela, Juhana Peltonen, Florian Röhr, Jan-Frédéric Plogmeier, Jörn Altmann, (alphabetically) Maurice Gagnaire, Mario Lopez-Ramos Pages 95 Deliverable 1.5 – Final Business Models for EASI-CLOUDS v1.0 Abstract The purpose of the business working group within the EASI-CLOUDS project is to investigate the commercial potential of the EASI-CLOUDS platform, and the brokerage and federation- based business models that it would help to enable. Our described approach is both ‘top down’ and ‘bottom up’; we begin by summarizing existing studies on the cloud market, and review how the EASI-CLOUDS project partners are positioned on the cloud value chain. We review emerging trends, concepts, business models and value drivers in the cloud market, and present results from a survey targeted at top cloud bloggers and cloud professionals. We then review how the EASI-CLOUDS infrastructure components create value both directly and by facilitating brokerage and federation. We then examine how cloud market opportunities can be grasped through different business models. Specifically, we examine value creation and value capture in different generic business models that may benefit from the EASI-CLOUDS infrastructure. We conclude by providing recommendations on how the different EASI-CLOUDS demonstrators may be commercialized through different business models. © EASI-CLOUDS Consortium. 2 Deliverable 1.5 – Final Business Models for EASI-CLOUDS v1.0 Table of contents Table of contents ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cloud Computing: a Taxonomy of Platform and Infrastructure-Level Offerings David Hilley College of Computing Georgia Institute of Technology
    Cloud Computing: A Taxonomy of Platform and Infrastructure-level Offerings David Hilley College of Computing Georgia Institute of Technology April 2009 Cloud Computing: A Taxonomy of Platform and Infrastructure-level Offerings David Hilley 1 Introduction Cloud computing is a buzzword and umbrella term applied to several nascent trends in the turbulent landscape of information technology. Computing in the “cloud” alludes to ubiquitous and inexhaustible on-demand IT resources accessible through the Internet. Practically every new Internet-based service from Gmail [1] to Amazon Web Services [2] to Microsoft Online Services [3] to even Facebook [4] have been labeled “cloud” offerings, either officially or externally. Although cloud computing has garnered significant interest, factors such as unclear terminology, non-existent product “paper launches”, and opportunistic marketing have led to a significant lack of clarity surrounding discussions of cloud computing technology and products. The need for clarity is well-recognized within the industry [5] and by industry observers [6]. Perhaps more importantly, due to the relative infancy of the industry, currently-available product offerings are not standardized. Neither providers nor potential consumers really know what a “good” cloud computing product offering should look like and what classes of products are appropriate. Consequently, products are not easily comparable. The scope of various product offerings differ and overlap in complicated ways – for example, Ama- zon’s EC2 service [7] and Google’s App Engine [8] partially overlap in scope and applicability. EC2 is more flexible but also lower-level, while App Engine subsumes some functionality in Amazon Web Services suite of offerings [2] external to EC2.
    [Show full text]
  • Cutter IT Journal
    Cutter The Journal of IT Journal Information Technology Management Vol. 26, No. 3 March 2013 “Cloud service providers, the IT industry, professional The Emerging Cloud Ecosystem: and industry associations, governments, and IT pro- Innovative New Services and fessionals all have a role to Business Models play in shaping, fostering, and harnessing the full potential of the emerging cloud ecosystem.” Opening Statement — San Murugesan, by San Murugesan . 3 Guest Editor Merging IaaS with PaaS to Deliver Robust Development Tools by Beth Cohen . 6 Intrusion Detection as a Service (IDaaS) in an Open Source Cloud Infrastructure by John Prakash Veigas and K Chandra Sekaran . 12 Cloud Ecology: Surviving in the Jungle by Claude R. Baudoin . 19 The Promise of a Diverse, Interoperable Cloud Ecosystem — And Recommendations for Realizing It by Kathy L. Grise . 26 NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION For authorized use, contact Cutter Consortium: +1 781 648 8700 [email protected] Cutter IT Journal About Cutter IT Journal Cutter IT Journal® Cutter Business Technology Council: Part of Cutter Consortium’s mission is to Cutter IT Journal subscribers consider the Rob Austin, Ron Blitstein, Tom DeMarco, Lynne Ellyn, Israel Gat, Vince Kellen, foster debate and dialogue on the business Journal a “consultancy in print” and liken Tim Lister, Lou Mazzucchelli, technology issues challenging enterprises each month’s issue to the impassioned Ken Orr, and Robert D. Scott today, helping organizations leverage IT for debates they participate in at the end of Editor Emeritus: Ed Yourdon competitive advantage and business success. a day at a conference. Publisher: Karen Fine Coburn Cutter’s philosophy is that most of the issues Group Publisher: Chris Generali that managers face are complex enough to Every facet of IT — application integration, Managing Editor: Karen Pasley merit examination that goes beyond simple security, portfolio management, and testing, Production Editor: Linda M.
    [Show full text]
  • KLIKON Solutions Adds High Quality Cloud Computing to Its IT Services Client Offering
    KLIKON Solutions adds high quality cloud computing to its IT services client offering “We were determined to build our own cloud computing infrastructure. Our engineers thoroughly analysed the market offerings and many failed to impress. The quality and cost effectiveness of the HP storage solution was a stand out. Our confident message now to clients is simple: Jump On Board.” —David Abouhaidar, director, KLIKON Solutions HP customer Objective case study HP server To offer cloud computing as part of its managed and storage business services portfolio to clients solution delivers KLIKON’s cloud Approach computing vision Determined to offer a first class cloud computing Industry infrastructure capability to its client base, KLIKON IT services conducted a rigorous research and analysis of the market for more than 18 months IT improvements • Established secondary data centre • Achieved business continuity with 100 per cent redundancy • Assured of HP support across the end to end solution Business benefits KLIKON Solutions is an Australia-wide organisation • Achieved goal of adding cloud computing to its specialising in the design, implementation and services portfolio management of IT systems. The company goes • Met its cost targets in achieving a robust cloud beyond the traditional managed service provider computing platform format in delivering remote management of mission-critical services, managing infrastructure, • Well positioned to meet growing client appetite networking and security. It caters for the business for cloud computing needs of a client base that crosses industry sectors as • Removed the IT cost ownership burden diverse as aerospace, financial services, health care, from clients manufacturing and retail. KLIKON follows through on a thorough review of a client’s business and technical needs with a well established partner model that implements infrastructure services, network and security solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Enterprise Paas
    Enterprise PaaS Freddie Platt Virtustream – Service Provider Team [email protected]| GLOBAL SPONSORS Virtustream PaaS [Freddie Platt, CSP] © 2018 Virtustream, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Best-in-class Dell Technologies Solution Cloud Foundry Virtustream Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) Service combines Pivotal’s industry-leading application development platform with Virtustream’s Cloud Service enterprise-class cloud to offer a fully-managed cloud-native application delivery Platform-as-a-Service, enabling enterprise developers to Virtualization rapidly build and re-platform enterprise applications to drive software innovation. Hardware 3 © 2018 Virtustream, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Virtustream Global Data Center Footprint – March 2018 Slough Swindon Amsterdam Chicago Frankfurt Paris San Francisco Boyers Tokyo Istanbul Santa Clara Yokohama Vienna Dubai Osaka Dallas Sterling Kobe Dulles Seoul Las Vegas Manassas Riyadh LEGEND Virtustream Enterprise Cloud Data Center Virtustream Storage Cloud Data Center Virtustream Enterprise Cloud and Virtustream Storage Cloud Data Center Sao Paulo Sydney Johannesburg Virtustream Federal Cloud Data Center – Cape Town FedRAMP Canberra, Australia xStream-enabled Service Provider © 2018 Virtustream, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Industry Analysts’ Assessment of Virtustream Gartner: Forrester: Ovum: • Among top five global cloud service • “The” Leader in hosted private cloud • Global IaaS market leader providers services • Top scorer for enterprise fit, innovation, • Dominates a unique niche in the market • Top ranked vendor in current offerings and interoperability due to focus on mission-critical and market presence categories • One of top two providers for security workloads • Highest scores in the innovation • The only leader with a true 100% • “Ability to execute” ranked ahead of roadmap & planned enhancements enterprise focus. traditional enterprise counterparts 5 © 2018 Virtustream, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Cloud Computing Infrastructure Services Buyer's Guide
    E-guide Cloud Computing Infrastructure Services Buyer’s Guide Your expert guide to cloud computing infrastructure services E-guide In this e-guide A primer on public cloud benefits A primer on public cloud Brien Posey benefits When used to extend existing data center footprints, public cloud Criteria for choosing a public can deliver big benefits for data backup and scalability. cloud provider With companies such as Amazon Web Services, Google, Microsoft and Compare public cloud providers Rackspace offering the ability to create virtual machines in the cloud to support and replace physical servers, cloud virtualization services are being integrated Virtustream into data center infrastructures. But knowing which features to consider and which vendors to compare can be a daunting task. Microsoft Azure This article is the first in a series that walks through the buying process for Amazon Web Services public cloud virtual server services. Here we cover the major benefits of using SoftLayer public cloud services as an extension of your data center infrastructure. Verizon Cloud The second article discusses the risks and costs associated with moving virtual machines (VMs) to the public cloud. The third article focuses on purchasing Rackspace criteria and preparing a vendor request for proposal (RFP). Finally, the series Google Cloud Platform will compare market-leading services against established criteria and against each other to help you select the best public cloud service for your environment. Page 1 of 57 E-guide In most cases, established organizations with IT resources on-premises should In this e-guide not dispose of existing servers and move everything to the cloud.
    [Show full text]