No Time to Waste! Critical Project Delivery at GRC Michael Shellshear Proterra Group

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

No Time to Waste! Critical Project Delivery at GRC Michael Shellshear Proterra Group No Time to Waste! Critical Project Delivery at GRC Michael Shellshear Proterra Group Abstract: Picture this. You’re a last-minute addition to the new waste levy zone that includes 39 of the 77 local government areas in Queensland. Other councils have had months to prepare for the July 1 implementation of a waste levy and to get upgrades to their facilities underway, but not you. You own seven regional waste facilities, six of which require varying degrees of modifications to suit the new legislation and have a very tight timeline to prepare. What do you do? This was the situation faced by the Goondiwindi Regional Council (GRC) in February of 2019 when opposition by other regional councils to its exclusion from the levy zone lead to their region being a last-minute addition. Their Inglewood, Talwood, Yelarbon, Texas, Toobeah and Bungunya waste facilities, located some 247 km apart, all needed upgrades. This presentation will focus on the procurement method utilised by GRC to engage a contractor to complete the works using a Local Buy arrangement and the significant benefits to Council by doing so. The specific contract used by GRC for the works was Contract BUS254 Project Management (Construction). Under this arrangement, Council was able to quickly engage a contractor to design and construct an urgent infrastructure project, but with considerable flexibility in project delivery. The multiple benefits to Council using this style of project delivery method include: - Rapid commencement of project (eliminated costly and time-consuming tendering process); - Ability to package works into smaller portions to enable bids by local contractors through RFQ process; - Ultimate control of sub-contractors, suppliers and materials used; - Ability to make “on-the-fly” scope and design changes without costly variations; - Provision of clear cost tracking and forecasting monthly; and - Return of a percentage of the project management fees to Council from Local Buy. Keywords: • Waste Management • Procurement • Local Buy Introduction Proterra Group in partnership with Goondiwindi Regional Council (GRC) have successfully implemented significant changes to Council’s waste management infrastructure and operations. GRC recognised the need and developed plans to rationalise its waste operations some time ago. Rapid changes to state legislation including the implementation of a waste levy meant Council needed to fast-track the planning, design and construction of upgrades to their waste facilities to ensure their capability of meeting the new regulations. Background GRC manages seven (7) waste facilities including: • Goondiwindi Waste Facility • Inglewood Waste Facility • Texas Waste Facility • Yelarbon Waste Facility • Talwood Waste Facility • Toobeah Waste Facility • Bungunya Waste Facility Prior to the project, all GRC waste facilities, with the exception of the Texas waste facility included a landfill. The Texas site had been converted to a waste transfer station prior to the 2008 Council amalgamations. Recognising a need to rationalise waste operations to meet its Environmental Authority (EA) conditions, GRC commissioned a Regional Waste Strategy in 2013. The waste strategy recommended that only the Goondiwindi and Inglewood waste facilities continue landfilling and become larger regional waste facilities. All other sites were recommended to close their landfill be converted to waste transfer stations with waste delivered to either Goondiwindi or Inglewood. Proterra Group was engaged to complete the detailed works for the closure and conversion of the smaller landfills to waste transfer stations and upgrading of the two larger sites to regional landfills. The works were programmed to be delivered in a staged approach over several financial years as funding allowed. Detailed Design of Waste Facilities Over a period of approximately 12 months, Proterra Group completed the survey and detailed design of the landfill closures and installation of waste transfer stations. Various other investigations were carried out including ground penetrating radar surveys and geotechnical work. With the exception of Goondiwindi and Texas, all sites needed wholesale changes to meet the requirement of the incoming waste levy. Below is a brief of summary of the proposed works for each site. Inglewood • New weighbridge and gate house • New 4 bin transfer station • New entrance and access roads • Upgrade resource recovery areas • Site fencing • CCTV Yelarbon and Talwood • Closure and capping of landfill cells • New 2 bin transfer station • New entrance and access roads • Upgrade resource recovery areas • Site fencing • CCTV Toobeah and Bungunya • Closure and capping of landfill cells • New 3 front lift bin transfer station • CCTV Figure 1 - Ground penetrating radar surveys Figure 2 - Example of detailed design drawings Queensland Waste Levy A waste levy is introduced to reduce waste being landfilled through a price signal and encourages the community to recycle. Before the landfill levy was introduced into Queensland, the Sunshine State was the only state in Australia that did not have some type of waste levy attached to the commercial disposal of waste. The lack of waste levy meant that the waste disposal costs were significantly less in the Queensland than and any other state. At the time of the levy review the average landfill levy of for the other states was approximately $52/tonne plus $60/tonne disposal fees with Queensland having only a $30/tonne disposal fee. Lower costs for waste disposal resulted in other states, namely NSW, trucking waste into Queensland. The Queensland waste levy was introduced in July 2019 as a strategy to combat the high rates of interstate commercial waste disposal and encourage recycling of waste generated in Queensland. The current levy rate is $75/tonne which increases for regulated waste with Category 1 at $155 and Category 2 at $110 (Queensland Government 2020a). The initial waste levy area incorporated 38 local governments where the majority of the state’s waste was generated and landfilled (Queensland Government 2020b). The decision to exclude the other 39 local governments was based on a cost-benefit approach acknowledging the costs to administer the levy for the less populated and regional and remote local governments was exhaustive and held little to no benefit (Queensland Government 2020b). After consultation about the new levy with the effected and interested local government representatives, it was decided that the Goondiwindi Regional Council should be incorporated into the leviable zone (as it was previously excluded) due to its location and relationship with the other effected local governments as shown in Figure 3 below (Queensland Government 2020b). Figure 3 - Map of waste leviable local governments in Queensland (Queensland Government 2020b). Project Delivery In response to the increasing scope of works for waste facility upgrades, GRC sought and were successful in receiving partial funding under both the Works for Queensland and Levy Ready Grants programs. The Levy Ready Grants was provided to assist Council’s such as GRC transition to a position whereby the levy can be accurately calculated and collected. The delivery method selected for the project was for Proterra Group to manage the upgrades as the principal works contractor through Local Buy, specifically contract BUS254 Project Management (Construction). A large focus of the delivery was to engage as many local suppliers and contractors within the GRC local government area to participate in the project. Given the nature of the works and the capability of the local suppliers and contractors, the work was packaged into 13 smaller contracts. Proterra sought quotations and tenders for each works package in accordance with GRC’s procurement policy. Evaluation of all offers received was completed by Proterra, with the recommendation forwarded to GRC for endorsement prior to awarding the contract. This delivery method effectively shared both the risks and opportunities for GRC and Proterra and meant GRC still retained ultimate control. Construction Construction commenced in April 2019 with work on all sites being carried out simultaneously, allowing contractors with works on multiple waste facilities to seamlessly mobilise to the next site. Works were supervised by Proterra engineers and civil supervisors in partnership with GRC officers. Progress claims were submitted monthly with a forecasting sheet which included forward projections of future claims and tracking against the budget. All sites, with the exception of Inglewood were completed by December 2019. Works were completed at Inglewood in April 2020 with the commissioning of the weighbridge and gatehouse. Figure 4 – Production of precast retaining wall panels by local contractor Figure 5 – Works on bin transfer station at Talwood waste facility Figure 6 – Completed weighbridge and gate house at Inglewood waste facility Figure 7 – Typical CCTV Camera Waste Operations At the largest project site, Inglewood, Proterra Group assisted Council with the integration of the Mandalay weighbridge software with GRC’s finance systems. This allows GRC to accurately account for all streams of waste entering the facility and also accurately report on the volume of waste being landfilled for collection of the waste levy. CCTV was also integrated with GRC’s existing camera system, giving GRC staff the ability to monitor any of its waste sites in real time. Figure 8 – Weighbridge operations and Mandalay software at Inglewood
Recommended publications
  • The Modelled Distribution of the Five-Clawed Worm-Skink (Anomalopus Mackayii)
    Map 2: The modelled distribution of the five-clawed worm-skink (Anomalopus mackayii) Injune Koko SF Allies Creek SF Kilkivan Wandoan Proston Gympie Jarrah SF Goomeri Barakula SF Wondai SF Gurulmundi SF Mitchell Wallumbilla Roma Diamondy SF Kingaroy Yuleba Nudley SF Miles Chinchilla Conondale FR Yuleba SF Jandowae Blackbutt Bunya Mountains NP Kilcoy Benarkin SF Toogoolawah Surat Braemar SF Dalby Esk Tara Kumbarilla SF Toowoomba Dunmore SF Laidley Western Creek SF Boondandilla SF Millmerran Boonah St George Main Range NP Warwick Whetstone SF State Forest Durikai SF Border Ranges NP Inglewood Goondiwindi Toonumbar NP Boggabilla Yelarbon Stanthorpe Dthinna Dthinnawan CCAZ Texas Girraween NP Sundown NP Wallangarra Mungindi Girard SF Tenterfield Torrington SCA Ashford Lightning Ridge Moree Deepwater Collarenebri Warialda Glen Innes Inverell Bingara Walgett Guy Fawkes River NP Bundarra Wee Waa Mt Kaputar NP Dorrigo Narrabri Barraba Pilliga West CCAZ Pilliga CCAZ Armidale Pilliga East SF Pilliga West SF Euligal SF Pilliga East CCAZ Manilla Timallallie CCAZ Oxley Wild Rivers NP Coonamble Baradine Pilliga NR INDICATIVE MAP ONLY: For the latest departmental information, please refer to the Protected Matters Search Tool at www.environment.gov.au/epbc/index.html km 0 20 40 60 80 100 Legend Species Known/Likely to Occur Species May Occur Brigalow Belt IBRA Region ! Cities & Towns Roads Major Rivers Perennial Lake ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! !! ! Non-perennial Lake Produced by: Environmental Resources Information Network (ERIN) Conservation Areas COPYRIGHT Commonwealth of Australia, 2011 Forestry & Indigenous Lands Contextual data sources: DEWHA (2006), Collaborative Australian Protected Areas Database Geoscience Australia (2006), Geodata Topo 250K Topographic Data CAVEAT: The information presented in this map has been provided by a range of groups and agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Darling Downs - DD1
    Priority Agricultural Areas - Darling Downs - DD1 Legend Railway Regional Plans boundary Parcel boundary C o g o Lake and dam o n R i Priority Agricultural Area ver DD4 DD7 DD1 DD5 DD8 M a r a n o a DD2 DD3 DD6 DD9 R iv e r r ive e R onn Bal 02.25 4.5 9 13.5 18 Ej Beardmore Dam kilometres B a l o n To the extent permitted by law, The Department of State Development, n e Infrastructure and Planning gives no warranty in relation to the material or R i information contained in this data (including accuracy, reliability, v e r completeness or suitability) and accepts no liability (including without limitation, liability in negligence) for any loss, damage or costs (including indirect or consequential damage) relating to any use of the material or information contained in this Data; and responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising from its use. Priority Agricultural Areas - Darling Downs - DD2 Legend Bollon St George Railway Regional Plans boundary Parcel boundary Lake and dam Priority Agricultural Area DD4 DD7 Ba DD1 DD5 DD8 lo n n e R i v DD2 DD3 DD6 DD9 e r r e iv R n a rr Na Dirranbandi ive r lgo a R Cu r e v i R a 02.25 4.5 9 13.5 18 ar k h kilometres Bo To the extent permitted by law, The Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning gives no warranty in relation to the material or information contained in this data (including accuracy, reliability, Lake Bokhara completeness or suitability) and accepts no liability (including without limitation, Hebel liability in negligence) for any loss, damage or costs (including indirect or consequential damage) relating to any use of the material or information contained in this Data; and responsibility or liability for any loss or damage New South Wales arising from its use.
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution and Impacts of Lippia (Phyla Canescens) in the Murray Darling System
    The Distribution and Impacts of Lippia (Phyla canescens) in the Murray Darling System. Final Report to the Lippia Working Group October 2003 Prepared by: Dr Judith Earl Agricultural Information & Monitoring Services ABN: 73 918 506 894 Contact Address: 73 Hardinge St Guyra NSW 2365 Phone: 02 6779 2286 Fax: 02 6779 2486 Email: [email protected] PHOTOGRAPHS: All photographs that appear in the document were taken by the author unless otherwise stated. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: The funding for this Murray Darling Lippia Working Group Project was provided by the Murray Darling Basin Commission and project management was provided by the Australian Cotton Cooperative Research Centre. This project was reliant on input from a vast number of individuals from a wide area, their cooperation and contribution to the project is greatly appreciated. i Executive Summary Lippia occurs predominantly on the clay soil floodplains of the inland river system in the 500- 800mm annual rainfall zone of Queensland and NSW, although it is present in varying density within each of the 19 catchments Murray Darling Basin. The worst affected catchments are the Condamine, Border Rivers, Gwydir, Namoi, Lachlan, Murrumbidgee and the Murray. Lippia is currently estimated to be distributed across at least 5% of the Murray Darling Basin occurring across a total area in the order of 5.3 million hectares. The spread of Lippia appears to be clearly related to flood events. Many farmers, particularly south of the Queensland border, stated that Lippia has become a problem since specific flood events. In the Gwydir region the Lippia population increased markedly following the 1996 flood and again after the 1998 floods.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Management Manual: Shire of Inglewood
    LA MANAGEM NT MANUAL S ire of Inglewood Written and Compiled by Members of THE INGLEWOOD SHIRE BICENTENNIAL LAND MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE EDITOR G. J. CASSIDY Published by the Inglewood Shire Bicentennial Land Management Committee Library Netlional of Australia Card Number and ISBN 0 7316 u.i33 9 ~Australia 1788-rel\ This publication has been funded by grants from The National Soil Conservation Programme and the Australian Bicentennial Authority to celebrate Australia's Bicentenary in 1988 Ill ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The committee acknowledges the continuing support of Members of the Inglewood Bicentennial Land the Inglewood Shire Council in providing meeting venues and Management Committee were as follows: secretarial services. Noel Biggs "Woodsprings" Inglewood The support of members of the Queensland Department Bruce Carey Soil Conservation Services Branch, of PrimaryIndustries, in particular Messrs. Tom Crothers and Old DPI Bruce Carey of Soil Conservation Services and Mr. Graham Linden Charles "Angle C" Inglewood Harris, Agriculture Branch, has been vital to the committee's Ross Chester Master Q'land Dept. of Forestry Inglewood success. Des Cowley "Wongalea" Inglewood John Crombie "Weyunga" Gore Also acknowledged is the valuable assistance of:­ Tom Crothers Soil Conservation Services Branch, Mr. Malcolm Taylor, Forester at Inglewood - for his contri­ Old. DPI bution and advice ian Dawson "Talbragar" Inglewood Dr. Tom Kirkpatrick, Queensland National Parks and Wildlife, Gordon Donovan "Kiltymaugh" Omanama for assistance in preliminary editing Frank Duggan '' Carawatha' ' Inglewood Dr. Colin Owen - for information on Tree Planting. Ron Elsley "Karara" Yelarbon Bruce Finlay "Emu Plains" Texas Members of the committee who contributed to chapters Max Fitzgerald "Glenelg" Cement Mills in this manual are: Russell Garthe Old Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Satellite Imagery Assists Flood Emergency Response and Recovery International Support for Geoscience Australia’S Contribution David Hudson and Norman Mueller
    ISSUE 102 June 2011 Satellite imagery assists flood emergency response and recovery International support for Geoscience Australia’s contribution David Hudson and Norman Mueller Heavy rainfall occurred across most of Australia between November from the United States, United 2010 and early February 2011 causing extreme flooding across Kingdom, Germany, Japan, Italy, eastern Australia, particularly in Queensland and Victoria. During France, Canada, Taiwan and the the flood emergencies, Geoscience Australia provided satellite European Commission. imagery and derived mapping information to support the emergency Between December 2010 response and recovery efforts. These images came from more than and February 2011, Geoscience twenty different satellites operated by governments and companies Australia acquired more than 600 Table 1. Detailed breakdown of each of the acquired datasets and their source. Satellite Type Acquisition window Scene Resolution Acquisition Country of sensor acquired (m) method origin Cosmo- RADAR 12.01.2011–13.01.2011 2 3 OGRE Italy SkyMed RADARSAT-2 RADAR 06.01.2011–12.01.2011 4 10 Charter Canada TerraSAR-X RADAR 04.01.2011–18.01.2011 9 10 Charter Germany ALOS, RADAR 04.01.2011–16.01.2011 6 10–30 Charter Japan PALSAR ENVISAT, RADAR 05.01.2011–17.01.2011 2 150 Charter European ASAR Commission Formosat 2, Optical 06.01.2011–10.01.2011 2 2–8 Charter Taiwan RSI Spot4/5 Optical 07.01.2011–09.01.2011 11 20–10 Charter France ASTER Optical 05.01.2011–17.01.2011 12 15 Charter Japan DMCii Optical 09.01.2011–20.01.2011 6 22 Charter
    [Show full text]
  • Public Library Collections 2021 Exchange Calendar – Cycle 3 (Selection Week)
    Public Library Collections 2021 Exchange Calendar – Cycle 3 (Selection Week) Week Dates Council/Region Library Branch Exchange Total number 1 16-20 Aug Cloncurry Shire Cloncurry Bob McDonald Library 419 Weipa Town Hibberd Library 496 Charters Towers Region Charters Towers 596 1,511 2 23-27 Aug Etheridge Shire Georgetown Library 232 Torres Shire Torres Shire Library 458 Southern IKC Cherbourg IKC 267 957 3 30 Aug-3 Sep Burke Shire Burketown Library 167 Richmond Shire Richmond Library 237 Eastern Cape IKC Yarrabah IKC 334 Eastern Cape IKC Hope Vale IKC 334 1,072 4 6-10 Sep Barcoo Shire Jundah Public Library 94 Barcoo Shire Stonehenge Library 79 Barcoo Shire Windorah Library 78 Carpentaria Shire Karumba Library 184 Carpentaria Shire Normanton Library 182 Torres Strait Island Regional Council Poruma IKC 226 Western Cape IKC Napranum IKC 267 1,110 5 13-17 Sep Maranoa Region Injune Library 102 Maranoa Region Jackson Library 91 Maranoa Region Mitchell Library 128 Maranoa Region Mungallala Library 85 Maranoa Region Roma Library 707 Maranoa Region Surat Library 71 Maranoa Region Wallumbilla Library 73 Maranoa Region Yuleba Library 54 Eastern Cape IKC Wujal Wujal IKC 267 1,578 6 20-24 Sep Cook Shire Bloomfield Library 128 Cook Shire Cooktown Library 504 Cook Shire Coen TBC Cook Shire Lakeland TBC Cook Shire Laura TBC Blackall-Tambo Region Blackall Library 261 Blackall-Tambo Region Tambo Library 102 TBC 7 27 Sep-1 Oct North Burnett Region Biggenden Library 101 North Burnett Region Eidsvold Library 117 North Burnett Region Gayndah Library 168 North
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government
    QueenslandQueensland Government Government Gazette Gazette PP 451207100087 PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ISSN 0155-9370 Vol. 355] Friday 5 November 2010 VACANCIES GAZETTE NOTICE Please note that Friday, 5th November 2010 is the last edition of the Vacancies Gazette There is no longer a requirement for Agencies to publish the vacancy positions in the Vacancies Gazette as per the Public Service Commission Recruitment and Selection Directive 1/10 as issued in January 2010. However, the requirement to publish the appointment of advertised vacancy positions in the Gazette remains in place. Therefore, all appointment notice submissions received from Monday, 8th November 2010 will be published in the Queensland Government General Gazette . All existing subscriptions to the Vacancies Gazette will be transferred to the General Gazette, i.e. from the week ending Friday, 12th November 2010 all Vacancies Gazette subscribers will receive the General Gazette for the duration of their subscription. If you would prefer to cancel your subscription to the Vacancies Gazette , please contact SDS by emailing [email protected] [599] Queensland Government Gazette Extraordinary PP 451207100087 PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ISSN 0155-9370 Vol. 355] Friday 29 October 2010 [No. 63 Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 NOTIFICATION OF REVOCATION OF DECLARATION OF STATE CONTROLLED ROAD AND MOTORWAY Exercising the power under section 24AA of the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 notice is hereby given under section 24 and 27 of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 of the revocation of: (a) the declaration as a state controlled road; and (b) the declaration of state controlled road as a motorway, of the road or route or part of the road or route described in the Schedule.
    [Show full text]
  • Waggamba Shire Handbook
    WAGGAMBA SHIRE HANDBOOK An Inventory of the Agricultural Resources and Production of Waggamba Shire, Queensland. Queensland Department of Primary Industries Brisbane, December 1980. WAGGAMBA SHIRE HANDBOOK An Inventory of the Agricultural Resources and Production ofWaggamba Shire, Queensland. Compiled by: J. Bourne, Extension Officer, Toowoomba Edited by: P. Lloyd, Extension Officer, Brisbane Published by: Queensland Department of Primary Industries Brisbane December, 1980. ISBN 0-7242-1752-5 FOREWORD The Shire Handbook was conceived in the mid-1960s. A limited number of a series was printed for use by officers of the Department of Primary Industries to assist them in their planning of research and extension programmes. The Handbooks created wide interest and, in response to public demand, it was decided to publish progressively a new updated series. This volume is one of the new series. Shire Handbooks review, in some detail, the environmental and natural resources which affect farm production and people in the particular Shire. Climate, geology, topography, water resources, soil and vegetation are described. Farming systems are discussed, animal and crop production reviewed and yields and turnoff quantified. The economics of component industries are studied. The text is supported liberally by maps and statistical tables. Shire Handbooks provide important reference material for all concerned with rural industries and rural Queensland. * They serve as a guide to farmers and graziers, bankers, stock and station agents and those in agricultural business. * Provide essential information for regional planners, developers and environmental impact students. * Are a very useful reference for teachers at all levels of education and deserve a place in most libraries.
    [Show full text]
  • Border Rivers and Moonie River Basins Healthy Waters
    Healthy Waters Management Plan Queensland Border Rivers and Moonie River Basins Prepared to meet accreditation requirements under the Water Act 2007- Basin Plan 2012 Healthy Waters Management Plan: Queensland Border Rivers and Moonie River Basins Acknowledgement of the Traditional Owners of the Queensland Border Rivers and Moonie region The Department of Environment and Science (the department) would like to acknowledge and pay respect to the past and present Traditional Owners of the region and their Nations, and thank the representatives of the Aboriginal communities, including the Elders, who provided their knowledge of natural resource management throughout the consultation process. The department acknowledges that the Traditional Owners of the Queensland Border Rivers and Moonie basins have a deep cultural connection to their lands and waters. The department understands the need for recognition of Traditional Owner knowledge and cultural values in water quality planning. Prepared by: Department of Environment and Science. © State of Queensland, 2019. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. For more information on this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Disclaimer This document has been prepared with all due diligence and care, based on the best available information at the time of publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Adopted Charges)
    State planning regulatory provision (adopted charges) July 2012 The Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning leads a coordinated Queensland Government approach to planning, infrastructure and development across the state. © State of Queensland. Published by the Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning, May 2012, 100 George Street, Brisbane Qld 4000. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of information. However, copyright protects this publication. The State of Queensland has no objection to this material being reproduced, made available online or electronically but only if it is recognised as the owner of the copyright and this material remains unaltered. Copyright inquiries about this publication should be directed to the department’s Legal Services division via email [email protected] or in writing to PO Box 15009, City East, Queensland 4002. The Queensland Government is committed to providing accessible services to Queenslanders of all cultural and linguistic backgrounds. If you have difficulty understanding this publication and need a translator, please call the Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS National) on 131 450 and ask them to telephone the Queensland Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning on 07 3227 8548. Disclaimer: While every care has been taken in preparing this publication, the State of Queensland accepts no responsibility for decisions or actions taken as a result of any data, information, statement or advice, expressed or implied, contained within. To the best of our knowledge, the content was correct at the time of publishing. Any references to legislation are not an interpretation of the law. They are to be used as a guide only.
    [Show full text]
  • Toowoomba Railway Roll of Honour Board 1914-19
    Toowoomba Railway Roll of Honour Board 1914-19 Dedication This research is dedicate to all those who are recorded on the roll of honour board but especially to 425 Pte David McCarthy, 9th Bn, killed in action on 25th April 1915. Introduction This research was started after a visit to Toowoomba station in July 2015 and discovering that the 559 names on the impressive roll of honour board appeared not to have been identified or, if this work has been done, was not readily available. The aim of this initial research was to get basic details of those men listed; it is not intended to be a comprehensive account of the soldiers on the roll of honour board or railways in the Darling Downs region. Sources used included records held by the Australian War Memorial, Canberra, and the National Archives of Australia. Consequently, there may well be errors and conflicting detail; the entries for each man are headline information only – anyone wishing to drill deeper should consult sources such as the soldiers’ personal papers, newspapers, unit war diaries and histories etc. In some instances, the ‘identified’ soldier may prove to be incorrect but at this stage the most likely identification is listed; details generally have been used verbatim from sources. One hindrance was ‘occupation’ as many do not have an obvious railway trade; it is possible that some had other jobs in addition to their railway employment. A line was drawn under this work in late 2016 still with eighteen names unidentified despite trying various sources. Most of the other names were identified with a good degree of confidence but readers are invited to take this work and refine it further.
    [Show full text]
  • SPER Hardship Partner Application Form
    Hardship Partner Application State Penalties Enforcement Regulation 2014 section 19AG(2) This purpose of this form is to enable organisations and health practitioners to apply to become an approved sponsor of work and development orders under the State Penalties Enforcement Act 1999 and/or provide advocacy services to SPER customers under the SPER Hardship Program Before completing this form, please read the SPER Hardship Program Participant Pack to find out more about the program and services and to ensure you are eligible to apply. 1. Applicant / organisation details Applicant / organisation name ABN or AHPRA number Address Suburb State Postcode 2. Applicant type Applicant category Sub-category ☐ Non-government ☐ Not-for-profit ☐ For-profit ☐ Government ☐ State ☐ Commonwealth ☐ Local ☐ Health practitioner ☐ Medical practitioner ☐ Psychologist ☐ Nurse practitioner 3. Contact person Name Position Phone number Email address 4. Hardship services that you/your organisation is applying to provide Please tick one or more service types ☐ Apply for work and development orders (please ensure to complete Question 6 & 7) ☐ Recommend hardship payment plans (accredited financial counsellors only) FCAQ number ☐ Recommend temporary hardship deferrals (for up to three months) SPER6002 Version 1 ©The State of Queensland (Queensland Treasury) Page 1 of 8 5. Locations where you/your organisation will provide these services ☐ All of Queensland or Select Local Government Area(s) below: ☐ Aurukun Shire ☐ Fraser Coast Region ☐ North Burnett Region ☐ Balonne
    [Show full text]