A Look Into Ocular Donation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Look Into Ocular Donation Andreea Bauknecht, ABOC, 20/20 IS IN SIGHT: A LOOK CPOT, COA, CEBT Quality Services Manager INTO OCULAR DONATION Medical Director Designee OBJECTIVES 1. Eye Banking History and Lions Eye Bank of Wisconsin 2. Corneal donation statistics 3. Research and Education 4. Ocular Donation Process 5. Other resources FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES No financial disclosures. WHAT IS AN EYE BANK? An organization that retrieves, evaluates, processes and distributes donated eye tissue for use in transplantation, research and education. HISTORY . First corneal transplant in 1905 by Dr. Eduard Zirm in Czechoslovakia ( live donor) . First successful US corneal transplant performed in 1937 by Dr. R. Townley Paton – “Father of modern eye banking” who opened the first Eye Bank in 1944 in New York. .Success led to more eye banks opening and the establishment of Eye Bank Association of America (EBAA) in 1961 – the nationally recognized accrediting body for eye banks. Historical transplanting: Patient placed on long waiting list Surgeon would recover ocular tissue Patient would need to lay flat for days Did not obtain useful vision for weeks Death row inmates as donors TODAY . Outpatient procedure . Corneal transplant procedure lasts 1-2 hours . Eye Bank recovers tissue for surgeon . Eye Bank processes tissue for surgeon . 95% success rate TODAY •Eye Bank Association of America is made up of 57 US banks and 11 international banks. Since 1961, member eye banks have provided tissue for over 1,954,600 people whose sight was restored through corneal transplants. 2018: 51,294 corneas were transplanted in US meeting 100 % of U.S. demand. 27,913 corneas were exported internationally 23,161 corneas used for research/training REGULATORY U.S. Food and Drug Administration 21 CFR Part 1271 Human Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-Based Products Eye Bank Association of America EBAA Medical Standards EBAA Procedures manual Wisconsin Statutes Section DHS 137, Section 157.06 Other regulations as dictated by country of import WHO CAN DONATE? ALMOST EVERYONE Chronic kidney disease patients Organ transplant recipients Certain cancer patients Hypertensive and diabetic patients Cataracts patients (with and without surgery performed) Patients with history of eye surgery Macular degeneration patients Glaucoma patients Blind patients INDICATIONS FOR CORNEAL TRANSPLANTATION .Ocular trauma .Complications from cataract surgery .Keratoconus .Repeat corneal transplant (95% of transplants are successful) .Corneal dystrophies ( Fuchs’, Lattice, ) .Microbial keratitis .Sterile ulcers (not related to infection) .Others THE LIONS EYE BANK OF WISCONSIN . 1953 - the first eye bank in the State of Wisconsin providing ocular tissue for transplant was opened in Milwaukee – sponsored by the Marquette University of Medical School. In 1964 it was taken over by the Wisconsin Lions Foundation (WLF) and was renamed the Wisconsin Lions Eye Bank. 1969 – a separate eye bank facility in Madison, WI was started with similar goals to the MKE program – administered through the University of WI and University Hospitals and Clinics. Both funded, in part, by the WLF. 1999 – the two eye banks merged to better serve the needs of Wisconsin under the name Lions Eye Bank of Wisconsin Inc. 501(c)3 non-profit organization . Serves 150 hospitals and most county coroners/Medical Examiners . FULL-SERVICE EYE BANK Provided close to 1600 Corneas for Transplant Local and Out of State Placement Wisconsin Transplants National & International Transplants CORNEA DISTRIBUTION 48% 52% 2018 Lions Eye Bank of WI 2018 Wisconsin Global Impact SURGICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH CENTER Building for Tomorrow . Providing surgeons with education and training opportunities . Webcasting Education and Training Internationally . Providing clinical space for researchers . Opportunities for surgical residents to train RESEARCH PARTNERSHIPS Diabetic Retinopathy Glaucoma in trabecular Columbia University Medical Center meshwork New York University of Wisconsin DOVS Madison, WI Keratoconus Study Instituto Universitario Fernandez-Vega Retinal cell culturing Oviedo, Spain University of Wisconsin DOVS Madison, WI Cataract formation University of Wisconsin-Biochemistry Madison, WI THE EYE DONATION PROCESS Referral Screening/ Evaluation Arrange Authorization/ Transport to Disclosure Surgeon and DRAI Process Tissue Recovery Evaluate for Donor Offer to Eligibility and surgeon Tissue Suitability DONOR SCREENING: REFERRALS • Mandatory hospital death reporting in the State of Wisconsin • Hospitals are required to report deaths to a referral organization. • Preliminary information obtained and triaged for automatic rule outs. • Age (2-75) for eye transplant • Referral passed to appropriate donation organizations REFERRAL PROCESS IN WISCONSIN Wisconsin has many donation organizations: • ORGAN: University of Wisconsin Organ and Tissue Donation/ Versiti Organ & Tissue Donation • TISSUE: American Tissue Services Foundation/ Versiti Tissue Bank • EYE: Lions Eye Bank of Wisconsin Hierarchy exists for who handles the referral Must be carefully coordinated As of August 1st, 2017 LEBW has an in-house Donor Support Center REFERRAL RECEIPT Coordinators receive the information and check Wisconsin’s Donor Registry Coordinators will call the referring facility to obtain further information about the potential donor to determine if and how we will approach All potential donors are screened for a variety of conditions and diseases to ensure the safety of the gift Not all contraindications can be detected through screening with the referring organization CONTRAINDICATED CONDITIONS Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS/HIV) Active viral encephalitis or encephalitis of unknown origin Active viral hepatitis (Hepatitis B&C) Creutzfeld-Jacob Disease (CJD) Rabies CONTRAINDICATED CONDITIONS Cancer of the blood or eye • Leukemia • Lymphoma • Myeloma • Ocular cancer of primary origin (such as retinoblastoma) or ocular metastases CONTRAINDICATED CONDITIONS Neurological conditions (Multiple Sclerosis, ALS, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s, Dementia) High-risk behavior (intravenous drug abuse) Systemic infection (bacteremia, fungemia, viremia, etc.) Travel Restrictions Receipt of unacceptable medical products (human derived dura mater) OTHER CONTRAINDICATIONS Other active infections Circumstances (timing is limited – cornea recovered within 12 hrs from death) Eye conditions This is not a complete list of contraindications many other conditions can affect the outcome or safety of a potential transplant, or may limit the use for transplant ACCEPTED CONDITIONS FOR TRANSPLANT . Age for transplant 2 – 75 . No age limit for research/education/training purposes . CANCER ( except for certain types of blood, bone marrow and ocular cancer) . PREVIOUS ORGAN TRANSPLANT . Ocular surgery: cataract surgery, LASIK/LASEK . Conditions not affecting cornea such as glaucoma, macular degeneration, vitreous detachments . DIALYSIS PATIENTS NEXT STEPS: LOGISTICS If no contraindications are found during screening, coordinators will: • Work with referring organization to identify legal next-of-kin • Communicate with ME/Coroner • Communicate with funeral home • Request cooling and eye care be performed • Contact the next-of-kin for legal authorization or disclosure THE EYE DONATION PROCESS Referral Screening/ Evaluation Arrange Authorization/ Transport to Disclosure Surgeon and DRAI Process Tissue Recovery Evaluate for Donor Offer to Eligibility and surgeon Tissue Suitability Governed by Wisconsin State Statute 157.06 Anatomical Gifts TYPES OF Two general types of authorization: AUTHORIZATION First Person Authorization ( via Wisconsin Registry, Advance Directive, Power of Approach of LNOK FOR DONATION Attorney for Healthcare Document) Guided by the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (UAGA) hierarchy Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (UAGA) hierarchy: 1. Donor 2. Healthcare agent or Power of Attorney 3. Spouse 4. Adult children 5. Parents 6. Adult Siblings 7. Adult grandchildren 8. Grandparents 9. Adults who exhibited special care or concern, except those who provided compensated health care for that individual 10. Legal guardian 11. Whomever the responsibility would lie with to dispose of the body Disclosure is notifying next-of-kin of decedent’s wishes to be a donor State/National Donor indicated desire Registry (Record to donate on a legally of Gift) binding document prior Advance DISCLOSURE Directive to death POAHC LEBW disclosures are performed via telephone and the conversation is recorded Approach is to obtain permission for donation from a legal decision maker Donor did not have a legally binding APPROACH FOR document of gift on file AUTHORIZATION LEBW authorizations are performed via telephone and the conversation is recorded Must be obtained prior to recovery DONOR RISK ASSESSMENT INTERVIEW Interview with ”knowledgeable historian” Allow us to obtain information falls outside of medical record Contains sensitive and personal subject matter that can be very difficult to cover with grieving family members Required by regulatory agencies to ensure the safety of the gift for recipients THE EYE DONATION PROCESS Referral Screening/ Evaluation Arrange Authorization/ Transport to Disclosure Surgeon and DRAI Process Tissue Recovery Evaluate for Donor Offer to Eligibility and surgeon Tissue Suitability Technicians are dispatched for recovery when authorization has been obtained RECOVERY TECHNICIANS On the road within 30 minutes of dispatch Technician travels to the recovery site and performs the recovery procedure
Recommended publications
  • Euro GTP Guidance
    EURO­GTP Euro GTP Guidance European Union Project in the framework of the Public Health Program Agreement number: 2007 207 Coordinator: Transplant Services Foundation 1 List of Authors ‐ Euro GTP Project Coordinator TSF ▪ Transplant Services Foundation | Spain Project Partners BISLIFE | Netherlands BTV ▪ Banca Tessuti della Regione Veneto | Italy CBC ▪ Hornhautbank Berlin Charite Universitatsmedizin | Germany EHB ▪ European Homograft Bank | Belgium ESB ▪ Euro Skin Bank | Netherlands HBM ▪ Hornhautbank München Gemeinnutzige | Germany ISS‐CNT ▪ Istituto Superiore di Sanita Centro Nazionale Trapianti | Italy KCBTiK ▪ Krajowe Centrum Bankowania Tkanek I Komórek | Poland QAMH ▪ Queen Astrid Military Hospital | Belgium REGEA ▪ Tampere Yliopisto. University of Tampere | Finland i Table of Contents PURPOSE AND SCOPE ................................................................................................................................................1 SECTION A: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS .......................................................................................................................3 A.1. PERSONNEL ............................................................................................................................................................... 3 A.2. FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT ..................................................................................................................................... 8 A.2.1. FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS FOR RECOVERY...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Freezing of Surplus Donated Whole Eyes in the Central Eye Bank of Iran
    RESEARCH Freezing of Surplus Donated Whole Eyes in the Central Eye Bank of Iran Use of Defrosted Corneas for Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty and Report of Postoperative Eye Bank Data Mozhgan Rezaei Kanavi, MD; Mohammad Ali Javadi, MD; Fatemeh Javadi; Tahereh Chamani, MS ABSTRACT especially when a shortage exists for fresh donor corneas for transplantation. PURPOSE: To describe the method of freezing and thaw- KEYWORDS: cornea, freezing, whole eyes, DALK, ing of donated whole eyes (DWEs), which were surplus to eye banks, thawing....................................... requirements in the Central Eye Bank of Iran (CEBI), and to report the 3-year results of using defrosted corneas in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) in keratoconic eyes. he Central Eye Bank of Iran (CEBI) is the METHODS: The method of freezing and thawing of only eye bank in Iran and is located in Tehran. surplus DWEs in the CEBI is described. Surplus DWEs Tissue requirements for corneal and scleral at the CEBI were disinfected, processed, and transferred T transplantation in Iran are supplied and preserved to the freezer (-70°C) for long-term preservation. In case 1 of a shortage of fresh and refrigerated corneas for DALK, by the CEBI. There has been an increasing trend in a frozen DWE was defrosted and distributed for trans- corneal transplantation in Iran, from 200 grafts in plantation either as a whole eye in moist chamber or as 1988 to 6,053 in 2012 (unpublished data). Keratoco- an excised corneoscleral disc in Eusol C at 2˚C to 8˚C. nus is the most common indication for penetrating Furthermore, eye bank data of the frozen DWEs as well 1 as postoperative eye bank reports of implementation of keratoplasty in Iran, accounting for 34.5% of cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Vigilance Notification for Organs
    NOTIFY - E xploring V igilanc E n otification for o rgans , t issu E s and c E lls NOTIFY Exploring VigilancE notification for organs, tissuEs and cElls A Global Consultation e 10,00 Organised by CNT with the co-sponsorship of WHO and the participation of the EU-funded SOHO V&S Project February 7-9, 2011 NOTIFY Exploring VigilancE notification for organs, tissuEs and cElls A Global Consultation Organised by CNT with the co-sponsorship of WHO and the participation of the EU-funded SOHO V&S Project February 7-9, 2011 Cover Bologna, piazza del Nettuno (photo © giulianax – Fotolia.com) © Testi Centro Nazionale Trapianti © 2011 EDITRICE COMPOSITORI Via Stalingrado 97/2 - 40128 Bologna Tel. 051/3540111 - Fax 051/327877 [email protected] www.editricecompositori.it ISBN 978-88-7794-758-1 Index Part A Bologna Consultation Report ............................................................................................................................................7 Part B Working Group Didactic Papers ......................................................................................................................................57 (i) The Transmission of Infections ..........................................................................................................................59 (ii) The Transmission of Malignancies ....................................................................................................................79 (iii) Adverse Outcomes Associated with Characteristics, Handling and Clinical Errors
    [Show full text]
  • EBAA Medical Standards – October 2016
    Medical Standards These Standards have the approval of the Eye Banking Committee of the American Academy of Ophthalmology October 28, 2016 Published by: EBAA th 1015 18 Street, NW, Suite 1010, Washington, DC 20036, USA www.restoresight.org ©2016. EBAA. All rights reserved. Page 1 EBAA Medical Standards – October 2016 Table of Contents A1.000 Introduction and Purpose ..............................................................................................5 A1.100 Scope ......................................................................................................................5 B1.000 Active Membership .........................................................................................................5 B1.100 Eye Bank Inspection...............................................................................................6 B1.200 Inspections by Official Agencies ...........................................................................6 C1.000 Personnel and Governance .............................................................................................6 C1.100 Director...................................................................................................................6 C1.200 Medical Director ....................................................................................................7 C1.300 Staff Performing Eye Banking Functions ..............................................................8 C1.400 Change in Governance ...........................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Ethical Issues in Living-Related Corneal Tissue Transplantation
    Viewpoint Ethical issues in living-related corneal J Med Ethics: first published as 10.1136/medethics-2018-105146 on 23 May 2019. Downloaded from tissue transplantation Joséphine Behaegel, 1,2 Sorcha Ní Dhubhghaill,1,2 Heather Draper3 1Department of Ophthalmology, ABSTRact injury, typically chemical burns, chronic inflamma- Antwerp University Hospital, The cornea was the first human solid tissue to be tion and certain genetic diseases, the limbal stem Edegem, Belgium 2 transplanted successfully, and is now a common cells may be lost and the cornea becomes vascula- Faculty of Medicine and 5 6 Health Sciences, Dept of procedure in ophthalmic surgery. The grafts come from rised and opaque, leading to blindness (figure 1). Ophthalmology, Visual Optics deceased donors. Corneal therapies are now being In such cases, standard corneal transplants fail and Visual Rehabilitation, developed that rely on tissue from living-related donors. because of the inability to maintain a healthy epithe- University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, This presents new ethical challenges for ophthalmic lium. Limbal stem cell transplantation is designed to Belgium 3Division of Health Sciences, surgeons, who have hitherto been somewhat insulated address this problem by replacing the damaged or Warwick Medical School, from debates in transplantation and donation ethics. lost limbal stem cells (LSC) and restoring the ocular University of Warwick, Coventry, This paper provides the first overview of the ethical surface, which in turn increases the success rates of United Kingdom considerations generated by ocular tissue donation subsequent sight-restoring corneal transplants.7 8 from living donors and suggests how these might Limbal stem cell donations only entail the removal Correspondence to be addressed in practice.
    [Show full text]
  • AMRITA HOSPITALS AMRITA AMRITA HOSPITALS HOSPITALS Kochi * Faridabad (Delhi NCR) Kochi * Faridabad (Delhi NCR)
    AMRITA HOSPITALS HOSPITALS AMRITA AMRITA AMRITA HOSPITALS HOSPITALS Kochi * Faridabad (Delhi NCR) Kochi * Faridabad (Delhi NCR) A Comprehensive A Comprehensive Overview Overview A Comprehensive Overview AMRITA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AIMS Ponekkara P.O. Kochi, Kerala, India 682 041 Phone: (91) 484-2801234 Fax: (91) 484-2802020 email: [email protected] website: www.amritahospitals.org Copyright@2018 AMRITA HOSPITALS Kochi * Faridabad (Delhi-NCR) A COMPREHENSIVE OVERVIEW A Comprehensive Overview Copyright © 2018 by Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences All rights reserved. No portion of this book, except for brief review, may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means —electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without permission of the publisher. Published by: Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences AIMS Ponekkara P.O. Kochi, Kerala 682041 India Phone: (91) 484-2801234 Fax: (91) 484-2802020 email: [email protected] website: www.amritahospitals.org June 2018 2018 ISBN 1-879410-38-9 Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center Kochi, Kerala INDIA AMRITA HOSPITALS KOCHI * FARIDABAD (DELHI-NCR) A COMPREHENSIVE OVERVIEW 2018 Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center Kochi, Kerala INDIA CONTENTS Mission Statement ......................................... 04 Message From The Director ......................... 05 Our Founder and Inspiration Sri Mata Amritanandamayi Devi .................. 06 Awards and Accreditations .........................
    [Show full text]
  • Ethical Issues in Transnational Eye Banking
    REVIEW Ethical Issues in Transnational Eye Banking Dominique E. Martin, PhD, MBBS, BA (Hons),* Richard Kelly, MD, BBiomed,† Gary L. A. Jones, BSc (Econ),‡ Heather Machin, RN, MBA,§ and Graeme A. Pollock, PhD, MPH, BSc (Hons)¶ discussion of issues relating to tissue-derived products and Purpose: To review ethical issues that may arise in the setting of musculoskeletal tissue banking, rather than eye banking transnational eye banking activities, such as when exporting or specifically.2,5 As recognized in the recent World Health importing corneal tissue for transplantation. Organization (WHO) Initiative on MPHOs, which aims “to Methods: A principle-based normative analysis of potential common support the development of global consensus on guiding dilemmas in transnational eye banking activities was performed. ethical principles for the donation and management of [MPHOs],”6 a number of ethical concerns are common to Results: Transnational activities in eye banking, like those in other all MPHOs, including ocular tissues used in transplanta- fields involving procurement and use of medical products of human tion.1,7 Common concerns associated with transnational origin, may present a number of ethical issues for policy makers and movement of MPHOs include national self-sufficiency, donor professionals. Key ethical concerns include the potential impact of autonomy, equity in resource distribution, and care of donors export or import activities on self-sufficiency of corneal tissue supply and recipients.1 In this article, we briefly review several within exporting and importing countries; potential disclosure ethical issues that may be associated with transnational eye requirements when obtaining consent or authorization for ocular banking activities, using the example of importation and tissue donation when donations may be exported; and difficulties exportation of corneas for transplantation.
    [Show full text]
  • Organ Transplant Transplants E.G
    New Layout-Dt 14-2-2009 - final.pmd 1 2/14/2009, 5:16 PM FROM THE EDITOR’S DESK / CONTENTS 2 From the Editor’s Desk Dr. Reeta J. Dalal 3 Guest Editorial Dr. Sudeep Shah 4 Cadaver Transplantation Dr. Rasika Sirsat 8 Corneal Transplant Dr. Nisheeta Agarwala & Dr. Pradyna 12 Heart Transplant Dr. Kaushal Pandey 16 Frontiers of Immunosuppression in Renal Transplant Dr. Jatin Kothari 20 Liver Transplant Dr. Sudeep Shah From the 24 Live Related Renal Transplant Dr. Alan Almeida Editor’s Desk 30 Stem Cell Transplant (SCT) Dr. Asha Kapadia Worldwide tens of 32 Lung Transplant - thousands of lives are Where does it stand today? transformed by the miracle Dr. Manoj Agni of organ donation. Tissue 36 Short History of Organ Transplant transplants e.g. skin, Dr. R. A. Bhalerao cornea, bone-marrow, 38 Hinduja News vessels are invaluable. In 40 Welcome the last half century transplant surgery has transformed from research to life-saving surgery. For every successful transplant there are Editorial Board thousands who are on the waiting list and Dr. Philip Abraham Dr. Tester Ashavaid probably die waiting to receive the graft. Organ Dr. C. Balakrishnan transplants are complicated by scarcity of organ Dr. Sudeep Shah Dr. Gauri Mankekar donors, various ethical and social issues. Editor In this issue Dr. Sudeep Shah, Liver Transplant Dr. Reeta J. Dalal Surgeon at Hinduja Hospital has put together Editor Emeritus articles from various specialities to give you an Dr. V. R. Joshi ‘Update on organ transplants’. Guest Editor Dr. Sudeep Shah Photography Pramod Tandel Dr. Reeta J.
    [Show full text]
  • First Report of the National Transplant Registry 2004 BLOOD and MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
    FIRST REPORT OF THE NATIONAL TRANSPLANT REGISTRY 2004 Editors Hooi L.S. Lela Yasmin Mansor With contributions by: Alan Teh K H, Chan L L, Shamala R, Choong YY, Michael Law SH, Mohamed Ezani, David Chew SP, Ganesalingam K, Lim CB, Tan SS, Goh BL, Hamdan Leman, Suzina Sheikh August 2005 © National Transplant Registry, Malaysia ISSN 1823-5719 Published by: National Transplant Registry 2nd Floor MMA House 124, Jalan Pahang 53000 Kuala Lumpur Malaysia Tel : (603) 4045 5948 Fax : (603) 4044 0613 e-mail : [email protected] Website: http://www.mst.org.my This report is copyrighted. However it may be freely reproduced without the permission of the National Transplant Registry. Acknowledgement would be appreciated. Suggested citation is: Hooi L.S., Lela Yasmin Mansor (Eds). First Report of the National Transplant Registry Malaysia 2004. Kuala Lumpur 2005. FOREWORD We are pleased to launch the first report of the National Transplant Registry (NTR). The Registry was formed in November 2003 with the primary aim of establishing a national audit to analyse and understand the demography and outcomes in the complicated field of transplantation. This first report has been made possible by the dedication, hard work and support from the various transplant source providers and data management team. Working in close collaboration with the Clinical Research Centre the NTR has made encouraging progress since its recent formation. We would like to thank the participating centres for their cooperation. Currently the Registry collects data from all centres performing organ and tissue transplantation in this country. Heart, blood and marrow transplantation data is now reported online.
    [Show full text]
  • Gamma-Irradiation Reduces the Allogenicity of Donor Corneas
    Gamma-Irradiation Reduces the Allogenicity of Donor Corneas The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Stevenson, William, Sheng-Fu Cheng, Parisa Emami-Naeini, Jing Hua, Eleftherios I. Paschalis, Reza Dana, and Daniel R. Saban. 2012. “Gamma-Irradiation Reduces the Allogenicity of Donor Corneas.” Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science 53 (11) (October 15): 7151. doi:10.1167/iovs.12-9609. Published Version 10.1167/iovs.12-9609 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:34428166 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Cornea Gamma-Irradiation Reduces the Allogenicity of Donor Corneas William Stevenson, Sheng-Fu Cheng, Parisa Emami-Naeini, Jing Hua, Eleftherios I. Paschalis, Reza Dana, and Daniel R. Saban* PURPOSE. To evaluate the utility and allogenicity of gamma- orneal transplantation, also known as corneal grafting, is irradiated corneal allografts. Cone of the oldest, most common, and most successful forms of solid tissue transplantation. In 2010, over 42,000 METHODS. Corneal buttons were harvested from C57BL/6 mice corneal transplantations were performed in the United States and decellularized with gamma irradiation. Cell viability was 1 assessed using TUNEL and viability/cytotoxicity assays. Ortho- alone. Despite advances in recognition and treatment, immune rejection remains the leading cause of corneal topic penetrating keratoplasty was performed using irradiated 2 or nonirradiated (freshly excised) C57BL/6 donor grafts and transplantation failure.
    [Show full text]
  • Cornea Donation in Denmark
    RESEARCH Cornea Donation in Denmark Vigdis Magnusdottir, MD; Jesper Hjortdal, MD, PhD; Kim Nielsen, MSc, PhD ABSTRACT Purpose: Shortage of donor corneal tissue exists in Denmark. The Danish Donor Register founded in 1990, contains individuals' consents to donation of a variety of tissues and organs including the cornea. This study describes the registered donors. Methods: Data from the Donor Register was analyzed. Results: Since the beginning of the register, the number of registered citizens has increased and now represents 18% of the total adult population. In addition, the diversity of consents has also evolved. Citizens in the larger cities consent more often than citizens living outside the cities. Females consent more often than men. Of those consenting to donation in the Donor Register, almost 85% of them have agreed to cornea donation. The Danish Cornea Bank however only record less than half of the expected donors among the deceased in hospitals due to the discrepancy in the age among the registered and the age at death. Conclusion: The number of corneas donated and procured is increasing. Corneal transplantation is the most common tissue/organ transplant procedure in Denmark. KEYWORDS Corneal transplantation. Donor register. Eye bank. Keratoplasty. Tissue donation. International Journal of Eye Banking • vol. 3 no. 1 • Mar 2015 • © 2015 Eye Bank Association of America. All rights reserved 1 www.eyebankingjournal.org RESEARCH Cornea Donation In Denmark INTRODUCTION Organ donation is life-saving whereas tissue donation can improve the quality of life. Visual impairment and blindness are strong predictors for reduced quality of life due to difficulties in e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Landmarks in the History of the Eye Bank Association of America
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EYE BANKING GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES The Evolution of Eye Banking in the United States: Landmarks in the History of the Eye Bank Association of America Patricia Aiken-O’Neill, JD; Mark J. Mannis, MD ABSTRACT Established in 1961, the Eye Bank Association of America (EBAA) was not only the first eye bank association in the world but also the first association to represent any group of organ or tissue transplantation profession- als. Its history is one of additional “firsts”: setting medical standards to ensure tissue safety, establishing an accreditation process for individual eye banks, and developing a certification program for eye bank techni- cians, among others. To accomplish these initiatives, the EBAA has fostered collaborations with diverse com- munities, including government officials, corneal surgeons, Lions Clubs members, researchers, tissue and organ banks, and international organizations, thus continuing to evolve its role in pursuit of an unchanging mission: to champion the restoration of sight. KEYWORDS: corneal transplantation, Eye Bank Association of America (EBAA), eye bank methods, eye banks, history of eye banks The Preamble to Eye Banking plasty development to North America. He became the chief proponent of pen- A date familiar to ophthalmologists and eye banking profession- etrating keratoplasty and developed ba- als alike is December 7, 1905, when Karl Edward Zirm, a young sic surgical techniques and instrumenta- physician in Moravia, performed the first successful penetrating tion, many of which remain the basis of graft into his patient.1 This single event catalyzed renewed en- contemporary surgery.3 thusiasm for the feasibility of penetrating keratoplasty. (See the From the beginning, what distin- related article in this issue, “Eye Banking in the 21st Century: guished keratoplasty from other ophthal- How Far Have We Come? Are We Prepared for What’s Ahead?”) mic procedures was the requirement for Fig.
    [Show full text]