Translocation of River Blackfish – Tarwin River Pilot Study J

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Translocation of River Blackfish – Tarwin River Pilot Study J Translocation of River Blackfish – Tarwin River pilot study J. O’Connor, F. Amtstaetter, R. Ayres, W. Koster and M. Bowler August 2016 Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Unpublished Client Report for West Gippsland Catchment Management Authority Translocation of River Blackfish– Tarwin River pilot study J. O’Connor 1, F. Amtstaetter 1, R. Ayres 1, W. Koster 1 and M. Bowler 2 1 Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research 123 Brown Street, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084 2 West Gippsland Catchment Management Authority, Corner Young and Bair Streets, Leongatha, Victoria 3953 Australia August 2016 Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning Heidelberg, Victoria Report produced by: Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning PO Box 137 Heidelberg, Victoria 3084 Phone (03) 9450 8600 Website: www.delwp.vic.gov.au Citation: O’Connor, J., Amtstaetter, F., Ayres, R. Koster, W. and Bowler, M. (2016). Translocation of River Blackfish – Tarwin River pilot study. Unpublished Client Report for West Gippsland Catchment Management Authority. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research. Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Heidelberg, Victoria. Front cover photo: River Blackfish with acoustic tag implanted (Renae Ayres) . © The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2016 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. You are free to re-use the work under that licence, on the condition that you credit the State of Victoria as author. The licence does not apply to any images, photographs or branding, including the Victorian Coat of Arms, the Victorian Government logo, the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning logo and the Arthur Rylah Institute logo. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Accessibility If you would like to receive this publication in an alternative format, please telephone the DELWP Customer Service Centre on 136 186, email [email protected] or contact us via the National Relay Service on 133 677 or www.relayservice.com.au . This document is also available on the internet at www.delwp.vic.gov.au Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. River Blackfish translocation Contents Acknowledgements 2 Summary 3 1 Introduction 4 2 Methods 6 2.1 Study site 6 2.2 Fish sampling 7 2.3 Fish tagging 8 2.4 Translocation 9 2.5 Movement 9 2.6 Habitat 9 2.7 Recruitment 10 2.8 Genetics 10 3 Results 11 3.1 Fish sampling 11 3.2 Translocation 11 3.3 Movement 11 3.5 Habitat 13 3.6 Recruitment 17 3.7 Genetics 17 4 Discussion 18 5 Recommendations 19 References 20 6 Appendices 22 1 River Blackfish translocation Tables Table 1 Potential source sites and their location .............................................................................................. 8 Table 2 Fish collected from potential source sites .......................................................................................... 11 Table 3 Summarised movement of acoustically tagged River Blackfish ......................................................... 12 Table 4 Water quality parameters and azolla condition at translocation sites during March 2016 ............... 12 Table 5 The abundance of and complexities at source and translocation sites .............................................. 15 Table 6 Summary of habitat assessment ......................................................................................................... 16 Figures Figure 1 Map of study area ................................................................................................................................ 7 Figure 2 Acoustic tag ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Figure 3 Spawning tube arrangement ............................................................................................................. 10 Figure 4 Examples of movement (red line) associated with high rainfall (as a surrogate for stream discharge) events (arrows) ................................................................................................................................... 13 Figure 5 Snag densities at the two source sites (top) and the two translocation sites (bottom) ................... 14 2 River Blackfish translocation Acknowledgements This project was funded by the Victorian Government using revenue raised from the sale of Victorian Recreational Fishing Licences. The authors would like to thank Tanya Cowell, Eleisha Keogh and Kate Williams (all WGCMA) who commissioned and managed the project. Tanya Cowell also provided regular water parameter data for the study sites. Lauren Dodd and John Mahoney (both ARI) are thanked for their assistance with fieldwork, as are Ross Drury and Ed Bickel and other members from Leongatha Angling Club who contributed to site selection. Special thanks to various private landowners who allowed us access to sites on their properties. Adrian Kitchingman analysed the snag density data and prepared maps. John Koehn and Dan Stoessel provided useful comments on an earlier version of this document. This work was conducted under Fisheries (and translocation) Permit No. RP827 and DELWP Animal Ethics Permit No. 15/19. 2 River Blackfish translocation Summary Populations of River Blackfish (Gadopsis marmoratus ) have declined in range and abundance throughout catchments in south-east Australia, including in the Tarwin River catchment in Victoria. The decline is despite the West Gippsland Catchment Management Authority (WGCMA) undertaking rehabilitation of many of the waterways over the past 25 years. Although such efforts are likely beneficial to various native fish, including River Blackfish, the likelihood of River Blackfish recolonising rehabilitated areas is considered low because the species typically does not move large distances. Translocating River Blackfish into rehabilitated areas may therefore represent an important tool to assist recolonization and support population recovery in the Tarwin River and other waterways throughout the species’ range. In this study, we collected 27 adult River Blackfish from upland areas of the Tarwin River West branch and translocated fish into rehabilitated and non-rehabilitated reaches of stream downstream, where they were historically abundant. We conducted subsequent monitoring to determine whether the translocation was successful, in particular, to determine: 1) whether the translocated River Blackfish survived; 2) whether they established new home ranges in the translocated sites, and 3) whether they reproduced during the 2015 breeding season. Translocated River Blackfish were tagged with acoustic transmitters to determine whether fish remained within translocation sites, whether fish in a non-rehabilitated area moved into a rehabilitated area, and whether fish returned to their original capture location. Artificial spawning tubes were also placed into the translocation sites to detect whether the translocated fish reproduced during the October-December 2015 breeding season. Spawning tubes were checked for eggs near the end of the breeding season. In autumn 2016 electrofishing was also undertaken in the translocation sites to detect recruitment of River Blackfish, as indicated by the collection of young of year individuals. Our findings suggest that the translocation was successful, with fish surviving and remaining within the translocated areas. Recruitment of River Blackfish however has not been detected. This result might reflect a lack of natural spawning habitat, the effect of the stress related to translocation close to the species spawning period or that recruitment did occur and it wasn’t detected at this time using the methods applied. We recommend ongoing monitoring of the translocated populations to determine the longer term survival, reproduction, increased distribution and condition of the translocated population. Through this monitoring, further information about River Blackfish habitat associations may be inferred and also whether additional habitat improvements are necessary (e.g. more instream wood, improved flow management). 3 River Blackfish translocation 1 Introduction River Blackfish (Gadopsis marmoratus ) occur in rivers and streams of south-east Australia. The species has declined in range and abundance since European settlement due to factors such as stream siltation, and removal of woody debris (Drew 2008). There are two forms of River Blackfish; a southern form and a northern form. The southern form grow much larger (<600 mm) than the northern form (<300 mm). Taxonomic research suggests that River Blackfish may represent up to five candidate species (Miller et al. 2004; Hammer et al. 2014; Ryan et al. 2004). River Blackfish typically occupy clear, gently flowing streams with abundant woody debris (Koehn and O’Connor 1990). The home range of adult River Blackfish is typically 25–30 m, although fish have been recorded moving 100 m or more (Khan et al. 2004; Koster and Crook 2008).
Recommended publications
  • West Gippsland Floodplain Management Strategy 2018
    WEST GIPPSLAND CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY West Gippsland Floodplain Management Strategy 2018 - 2027 Disclaimer Acknowledgements This publication may be of assistance to you but The development of this West Gippsland the West Gippsland Catchment Management Floodplain Management Strategy has involved Authority (WGCMA) and its employees do not the collective effort of a number of individuals guarantee that the publication is without flaw and organisations. of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your Primary author – Linda Tubnor (WGCMA) particular purpose. It therefore disclaims all Support and technical input – WGCMA liability for any error, loss or other consequence Board (Jane Hildebrant, Ian Gibson, Courtney which may arise from you relying on any Mraz), Martin Fuller (WGCMA), Adam Dunn information in this publication. (WGCMA), Catherine Couling (WGCMA), Copyright and representatives from VICSES, Bass Coast Shire Council, Baw Baw Shire Council, Latrobe © West Gippsland Catchment Management City Council, South Gippsland Shire Council, Authority Wellington Shire Council, East Gippsland First published 2017. This publication is Shire Council, East Gippsland Catchment copyright. No part may be reproduced by any Management Authority, DELWP, Bunurong process except in accordance with the provisions Land Council, Gunaikurnai Land and Waters of the Copyright Act 1968. Aboriginal Corporation and Boon Wurrung Foundation. Accessibility Acknowledgement of Country This document is available in alternative formats upon request. We would like to acknowledge and pay our respects to the Traditional Land Owners and other indigenous people within the catchment area: the Gunaikurnai, The Bunurong and Boon Wurrung, and the Wurundjeri people. We also recognise the contribution of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and organisations in Land and Natural Resource Management.
    [Show full text]
  • Talk Wild Trout Conference Proceedings 2015
    Talk Wild Trout 2015 Conference Proceedings 21 November 2015 Mansfield Performing Arts Centre, Mansfield Victoria Partners: Fisheries Victoria Editors: Taylor Hunt, John Douglas and Anthony Forster, Freshwater Fisheries Management, Fisheries Victoria Contact email: [email protected] Preferred way to cite this publication: ‘Hunt, T.L., Douglas, J, & Forster, A (eds) 2015, Talk Wild Trout 2015: Conference Proceedings, Fisheries Victoria, Department of Economic Development Jobs Transport and Resources, Queenscliff.’ Acknowledgements: The Victorian Trout Fisher Reference Group, Victorian Recreational Fishing Grants Working Group, VRFish, Mansfield and District Fly Fishers, Australian Trout Foundation, The Council of Victorian Fly Fishing Clubs, Mansfield Shire Council, Arthur Rylah Institute, University of Melbourne, FlyStream, Philip Weigall, Marc Ainsworth, Vicki Griffin, Jarod Lyon, Mark Turner, Amber Clarke, Andrew Briggs, Dallas D’Silva, Rob Loats, Travis Dowling, Kylie Hall, Ewan McLean, Neil Hyatt, Damien Bridgeman, Paul Petraitis, Hui King Ho, Stephen Lavelle, Corey Green, Duncan Hill and Emma Young. Project Leaders and chapter contributors: Jason Lieschke, Andrew Pickworth, John Mahoney, Justin O’Connor, Canran Liu, John Morrongiello, Diane Crowther, Phil Papas, Mark Turner, Amber Clarke, Brett Ingram, Fletcher Warren-Myers, Kylie Hall and Khageswor Giri.’ Authorised by the Victorian Government Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport & Resources (DEDJTR), 1 Spring Street Melbourne Victoria 3000. November 2015
    [Show full text]
  • Tarwin Water Supply Catchment Water Quality Management Plan
    Tarwin Water Supply Catchment Water Quality Management Plan Report Prepared for South Gippsland Water and South Gippsland Shire Council By Ecos Environmental Consulting and Water Technology November 2014 Document Information Revision Status Prepared by Issued to Date Approved 1.0 TOC Draft Nick O’Connor Kerry Matthews 20 March 2014 Nick O’Connor and Sarah Law 1.1 Draft Nick O’Connor Kerry Matthews 9 October 2014 Nick O’Connor and Sarah Law 1.2 Final Nick O’Connor Kerry Matthews 26 November Nick O’Connor and Sarah Law 2014 Created by Ecos Environmental Consulting Pty Ltd ABN 11 086 102 383, ACN 086 102 383 Suite 3, Level 1, 339 Whitehorse Rd, Balwyn, Victoria 3103 Mail PO Box 1064G North Balwyn Victoria 3104 Tel +61 3 9830 7740 Fax +61 3 9830 7741 Mob 0408 520 579 (Nick) Email [email protected] Web www.ecosec.com.au File name K:\Ecos Projects\1251 - SGW Tarwin River Catchment WQ RA\Report - Final\Tarwin WS_CMP Final 26Nov2014.docx+ Client Kerry Matthews Name of organisation South Gippsland Water Name of project Tarwin Water Supply Catchment Modelling Study Name of document Tarwin WS_CMP Final 26Nov2014 Document version 1.2 Cover Images and logos are © Ecos Environmental Consulting Sensitivity This document and the information, ideas, concepts, methodologies, technologies and other material it contains remain the intellectual property of Ecos Environmental Consulting P/L, South Gippsland Water and South Gippsland Shire Council. The document is not to be copied without the express permission of at least one of the above parties. REPORT: Tarwin Water Supply Catchment Water Quality Management Plan Ecos Environmental Consulting Pty Ltd and Water Technology Pty Ltd 1251: 2014 2 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SALINITY SENSITIVITY in EARLY LIFE STAGES of an AUSTRALIAN FRESHWATER FISH, MURRAY COD (Maccullochella Peelii Peelii Mitchell 1838)
    i SALINITY SENSITIVITY IN EARLY LIFE STAGES OF AN AUSTRALIAN FRESHWATER FISH, MURRAY COD (Maccullochella peelii peelii Mitchell 1838) Piyapong Chotipuntu THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA Submitted August 2003 ii © Piyapong Chotipuntu 2003 Abstract The Murray cod (Maccullochella peelii peelii Mitchell 1838) is Australia’s largest freshwater fish. Once highly abundant in the Murray-Darling river system, populations have drastically declined in recent decades. Many causes for this decline have been proposed, including over-fishing, habitat loss and altered river flow regimes. This study hypothesised that elevated salinities have led to selective mortality in some developmental stages, which have in turn depleted stock recruitment and adult populations. The objectives of this study were to determine the optimal, threshold, upper sublethal and lethal salinities for development of eggs, yolk-sac larvae, fry and fingerlings of M. peelii peelii. Investigation the impact of salinity on fertilisation utilised gametes of trout cod (M. macquariensis, Cuvier 1829) instead of M. peelii peelii. Studies were carried out in a controlled laboratory environment using test media prepared from commercial sea salt. The results showed that the eggs of the trout cod hatched only when fertilised and incubated in freshwater, and only larvae hatched in freshwater survived through the yolk absorption period of 12 days. Yolk utilisation efficiencies were not significantly different among the salinities of 0-0.30 g/L. There was no effect of pre- or post- fertilising processes on the salinity tolerances of yolk-sac larvae. No larvae survived at salinities higher than 0.30 g/L during the yolk utilisation period.
    [Show full text]
  • West Gippsland Region
    Powlett River. Courtesy WGCMA The West Gippsland region is diverse and characterised by areas of natural forest, West areas of high conservation value, fertile floodplains for agriculture, as well as having Gippsland major coal deposits and the Loy Yang, Hazelwood and Yallourn power stations. Region Three river basins form the region – Thomson (basin 25), Latrobe (basin 26) and South Gippsland (basin 27). West Gippsland Region In the north of the region is the Thomson basin, Hydrology characterised by the naturally forested Eastern Highlands. At the foot of the highlands are two major dams - Lake The hydrological condition of streams across the West Glenmaggie and the Thomson dam. Over half (55%) of Gippsland region reflects the varied land use - from natural the stream length in the Thomson basin was found to be and near natural flow regimes in headwater streams in in good or excellent condition. Of the remainder, 41% of forested areas of the region to flow regimes under immense stream length was in moderate condition and just 3% stress in areas dependent on water supply for domestic and 1% in poor and very poor condition respectively. and agricultural use. In the centre of the region is the Latrobe basin. The basin Thomson Dam provided 12,046 ML of environmental water features vast tracts of forest through the Strezlecki Ranges in 2011-12 for six reaches on the Thomson River (reaches and the Great Dividing Range, where streams rise and flow 1-5) and Rainbow Creek (reach 17) and Lake Glenmaggie to Lake Wellington in the east. Although much of the land provided 14,018 ML of environmental water to two reaches has been cleared for agriculture, the dominant land use is on the Macalister River (reaches 7 and 8).
    [Show full text]
  • ACT, Australian Capital Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article 4.7MB .Pdf File
    . https://doi.org/10.24199/j.mmv.1979.40.04 31 July 1979 VERTEBRATE FAUNA OF SOUTH GIPPSLAND, VICTORIA By K. C. Norris, A. M. Gilmore and P. W. Menkhorst Fisheries and Wildlife Division, Ministry for Conservation, Arthur Ryiah Institute for Environmental Research, 123 Brown Street, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084 Abstract The South Gippsland area of eastern Victoria is the most southerly part of the Australian mainland and is contained within the Bassian zoogeographic subregion. The survey area contains most Bassian environments, including ranges, river flats, swamps, coastal plains, mountainous promontories and continental islands. The area was settled in the mid 180()s and much of the native vegetation was cleared for farming. The status (both present and historical) of 375 vertebrate taxa, 50 mammals, 285 birds, 25 reptiles and 15 amphibians is discussed in terms of distribution, habitat and abundance. As a result of European settlement, 4 mammal species are now extinct and several bird species are extinct or rare. Wildlife populations in the area now appear relatively stable and are catered for by six National Parks and Wildlife Reserves. Introduction TOPOGRAPHY AND PHYSIOGRAPHY {see Hills 1967; and Central Planning Authority 1968) Surveys of wildlife are being conducted by The north and central portions of the area the Fisheries and Wildlife Division of the are dominated by the South Gippsland High- Ministry for Conservation as part of the Land lands (Strzelecki Range) which is an eroded, Conservation Council's review of the use of rounded range of uplifted Mesozoic sand- Crown Land in Victoria. stones and mudstones rising to 730 m.
    [Show full text]
  • Deficiencies in Our Understanding of the Hydro-Ecology of Several Native Australian Fish: a Rapid Evidence Synthesis
    Marine and Freshwater Research, 2018, 69, 1208–1221 © CSIRO 2018 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF17241 Supplementary material Deficiencies in our understanding of the hydro-ecology of several native Australian fish: a rapid evidence synthesis Kimberly A. MillerA,D, Roser Casas-MuletB,A, Siobhan C. de LittleA, Michael J. StewardsonA, Wayne M. KosterC and J. Angus WebbA,E ADepartment of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia. BWater Research Institute, Cardiff University, The Sir Martin Evans Building, Museum Avenue, Cardiff, CF10 3AX, UK. CArthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Heidelberg, Vic. 3084, Australia. DPresent address: Healesville Sanctuary, Badger Creek Road, Healesville, Vic. 3777, Australia. ECorresponding author. Email address: [email protected] Page 1 of 30 Marine and Freshwater Research © CSIRO 2018 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF17241 Table S1. All papers located by standardised searches and following citation trails for the two rapid evidence assessments All papers are marked as Relevant or Irrelevant based on a reading of the title and abstract. Those deemed relevant on the first screen are marked as Relevant or Irrelevant based on a full assessment of the reference.The table contains incomplete citation details for a number of irrelevant papers. The information provided is as returned from the different evidence databases. Given that these references were not relevant to our review, we have not sought out the full citation details. Source Reference Relevance Relevance (based on title (after reading and abstract) full text) Pygmy perch & carp gudgeons Search hit Anon (1998) Soy protein-based formulas: recommendations for use in infant feeding.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Habitat of River Blackfish (Gadopsis Marmoratus) in Mccallum and Tullaroop Creeks, North-Central Victoria
    Distribution and Habitat Of River Blackfish (Gadopsis marmoratus) in McCallum and Tullaroop Creeks, north-central Victoria A report to North Central Catchment Management Authority Kris Pitman & Paul Tinkler Freshwater Ecology Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research September 2005 River Blackfish Distribution and Habitat © FRESHWATER ECOLOGY, SEPTEMBER 2005 PRODUCED BY: AUTHOR Kris S. Pitman and Paul Tinkler INSTITUTION Freshwater Ecology Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Department of Sustainability and Environment 123 Brown Street, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084. Telephone: (03) 9450 8600 Facsimile: (03) 9450 8799 PRODUCED FOR: CONTACT Brad Drust and Angela Gladman INSTITUTION North Central Catchment Management Authority 628-634 Midland Highway, Huntley 3551 TITLE: Distribution and Habitat of River Blackfish (Gadopsis marmoratus) in McCallum and Tullaroop Creeks, north-central Victoria. Cover images (clock-wise from top-left): McCallum Creek (site Mc 4), McCallum Creek (site Mc 5); River Blackfish (Gadopsis marmoratus) from Tullaroop creek site T-3. All images by K. Pitman. Freshwater Ecology, Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, DSE i River Blackfish Distribution and Habitat TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................... 1 2.0 METHODS .................................................................................................................. 2 2.1 STUDY SITES............................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • NSW Recreational Freshwater Fishing Guide 2020-21
    NSW Recreational Freshwater Fishing Guide 2020–21 www.dpi.nsw.gov.au Report illegal fishing 1800 043 536 Check out the app:FishSmart NSW DPI has created an app Some data on this site is sourced from the Bureau of Meteorology. that provides recreational fishers with 24/7 access to essential information they need to know to fish in NSW, such as: ▢ a pictorial guide of common recreational species, bag & size limits, closed seasons and fishing gear rules ▢ record and keep your own catch log and opt to have your best fish pictures selected to feature in our in-app gallery ▢ real-time maps to locate nearest FADs (Fish Aggregation Devices), artificial reefs, Recreational Fishing Havens and Marine Park Zones ▢ DPI contact for reporting illegal fishing, fish kills, ▢ local weather, tide, moon phase and barometric pressure to help choose best time to fish pest species etc. and local Fisheries Offices ▢ guides on spearfishing, fishing safely, trout fishing, regional fishing ▢ DPI Facebook news. Welcome to FishSmart! See your location in Store all your Contact Fisheries – relation to FADs, Check the bag and size See featured fishing catches in your very Report illegal Marine Park Zones, limits for popular species photos RFHs & more own Catch Log fishing & more Contents i ■ NSW Recreational Fishing Fee . 1 ■ Where do my fishing fees go? .. 3 ■ Working with fishers . 7 ■ Fish hatcheries and fish stocking . 9 ■ Responsible fishing . 11 ■ Angler access . 14 ■ Converting fish lengths to weights. 15 ■ Fishing safely/safe boating . 17 ■ Food safety . 18 ■ Knots and rigs . 20 ■ Fish identification and measurement . 27 ■ Fish bag limits, size limits and closed seasons .
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Genetics Informs Mesohabitat Preference and Conservation Priorities for a Surrogate Indicator Species in a Highly Fragmented River System
    Heredity (2017) 118, 374–384 & 2017 Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature. All rights reserved 0018-067X/17 www.nature.com/hdy ORIGINAL ARTICLE Landscape genetics informs mesohabitat preference and conservation priorities for a surrogate indicator species in a highly fragmented river system J Lean1, MP Hammer2,3, PJ Unmack4, M Adams2,5 and LB Beheregaray1 Poor dispersal species represent conservative benchmarks for biodiversity management because they provide insights into ecological processes influenced by habitat fragmentation that are less evident in more dispersive organisms. Here we used the poorly dispersive and threatened river blackfish (Gadopsis marmoratus) as a surrogate indicator system for assessing the effects of fragmentation in highly modified river basins and for prioritizing basin-wide management strategies. We combined individual, population and landscape-based approaches to analyze genetic variation in samples spanning the distribution of the species in Australia’s Murray–Darling Basin, one of the world’s most degraded freshwater systems. Our results indicate that G. marmoratus displays the hallmark of severe habitat fragmentation with notably scattered, small and demographically isolated populations with very low genetic diversity—a pattern found not only between regions and catchments but also between streams within catchments. By using hierarchically nested population sampling and assessing relationships between genetic uniqueness and genetic diversity across populations, we developed a spatial management framework that includes the selection of populations in need of genetic rescue. Landscape genetics provided an environmental criterion to identify associations between landscape features and ecological processes. Our results further our understanding of the impact that habitat quality and quantity has on habitat specialists with similarly low dispersal.
    [Show full text]
  • Benefits of Environmental Water – Spawning of Australian Grayling in Four Coastal Rivers Fact Sheet 3 - Spawning Success of Australian Grayling
    Benefits of environmental water – Spawning of Australian Grayling in four coastal rivers Fact sheet 3 - Spawning success of Australian Grayling Investigating how to use environmental water to Studying Australian Grayling protect and restore environmental values within rivers, floodplains, wetlands and estuaries. From 2008 to 2015, the Arthur Rylah Institute (ARI) studied the effects of flows on spawning of Australian Background Grayling. The objective was to identify key components of the flow regime (hydrograph) that could be provided Australian Grayling (Prototroctes maraena) is a annually to stimulate downstream spawning nationally threatened fish that lives in coastal rivers in migrations from March to May. south-eastern Australia. The species is amphidromous, meaning adults spawn in the lower freshwater reaches, Monitoring spawning success larvae then drift downstream to the sea, and juveniles migrate back upstream into freshwater. There has Eggs and larvae of Australian Grayling were collected in been a dramatic decline in abundance and distribution the lower Bunyip and Yarra rivers annually from 2008 of Australian Grayling, due largely to altered flow to 2015 using drift nets. This represents an important regimes and stream barriers, which block fish continuous dataset to analyse flow patterns and the migration. ecology of a nationally threatened species. Eggs and larvae were collected in the Thomson River from 2013 Managing environmental water releases to 2015 and in the Tarwin River in 2012. In Victoria, many agencies work to implement Monitoring results environmental watering programs. West Gippsland Catchment Management Authority and Melbourne Bunyip River Water have develop seasonal watering proposals The peak abundances of eggs and larvae which include key flow objectives to deliver within (about 70%) coincided with a within-channel channel flow pulses, known as 'freshes', to specifically flow pulse in late April.
    [Show full text]