DOCSLIB.ORG

Online Version

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Online Version Online version Key to Keys online version Copyright © 1993, 2000 by Cooperative Research Centre For Freshwater Ecology, Ellis Street, Thurgoona, P.O. Box 921, Albury, NSW 2640 National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication. Hawking, John H. (John Henry), 1949-. A preliminary guide to keys and zoological information to identify invertebrates from Australian freshwaters. ISSN 1321-280X. ISBN 0 646 17041 4. I. Freshwater invertebrates - Australia - Identification. I. Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology. II. Title. (Series : Identification guide (Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology); no.2). 592.092994 MDFRC Page 1 of 47 30/01/2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................1 TAXONOMIC AND ZOOLOGICAL INFORMATION ..........................................................................................2 PHYLUM PROTOZOA .......................................................................................................................................2 PHYLUM PORIFERA (Sponges) .......................................................................................................................2 PHYLUM COELENTERATA OR CNIDARIA (Hydras, jellyfish).........................................................................2 CLASS HYDROZOA.......................................................................................................................................3 PHYLUM PLATYHELMINTHES (Primitive worms)............................................................................................3 CLASS TEMNOCEPHALIDEA .......................................................................................................................3 CLASS TURBELLARIA ..................................................................................................................................3 Order Tricladida (Flatworms) ......................................................................................................................3 Order Catenulida (Microturbellarians).........................................................................................................3 Order Macrostomida (Microturbellarians) ...................................................................................................3 Order Neorhabdocoela (Microturbellarians) ...............................................................................................3 Order Alloeocoela (Microturbellarians) .......................................................................................................4 PHYLUM NEMERTEA (Proboscis worms) ........................................................................................................4 PHYLUM NEMATODA (Roundworms) ..............................................................................................................4 PHYLUM NEMATOMORPHA (Horsehair worms) .............................................................................................4 PHYLUM ROTIFERA (Rotifers) .........................................................................................................................4 PHYLUM GASTROTRICHA...............................................................................................................................5 PHYLUM BRYOZOA or POLYZOA (Pipe moss or moss animalcules) .............................................................5 PHYLUM MOLLUSCA (Snails, mussels) ...........................................................................................................5 CLASS GASTROPODA (Snails) ....................................................................................................................5 CLASS BIVALVIA (Mussels) ..........................................................................................................................6 PHYLUM ANNELIDA (True worms, leeches) ....................................................................................................6 CLASS OLIGOCHAETA (Aquatic earthworms)..............................................................................................6 CLASS HIRUDINEA (Leeches) ......................................................................................................................6 CLASS APHANONEURA ...............................................................................................................................7 CLASS POLYCHAETA (Bristleworms)...........................................................................................................7 PHYLUM TARDIGRADA (Water bears).............................................................................................................7 PHYLUM ARTHROPODA ..................................................................................................................................7 CLASS ARACHNIDA (Mites & spiders)..........................................................................................................7 Order Acariformes (formerly Acarina) (Mites).............................................................................................7 Order Araneae (Spiders).............................................................................................................................8 CLASS CRUSTACEA.....................................................................................................................................8 Order Anostraca (Fairy shrimps).................................................................................................................8 Order Notostraca (Tadpole or Shield shrimps) ...........................................................................................9 Order Anaspidinea ....................................................................................................................................10 Order Bathynellacea .................................................................................................................................10 Order Thermosbaenacea..........................................................................................................................11 Order Isopoda ...........................................................................................................................................11 Order Amphipoda (Scuds) ........................................................................................................................11 Order Decapoda........................................................................................................................................12 CLASS COLLEMBOLA (Springtails) ............................................................................................................12 CLASS INSECTA (Insects)...........................................................................................................................12 Order Ephemeroptera (Mayflies) ..............................................................................................................12 Order Odonata (Dragonflies and damselflies) ..........................................................................................13 Order Plecoptera (Stoneflies)....................................................................................................................14 Order Hemiptera (Bugs)............................................................................................................................14 Order Megaloptera (Alderflies, dobsonflies) .............................................................................................15 Order Neuroptera (Lace-wings) ................................................................................................................15 Order Coleoptera (Beetles).......................................................................................................................15 Order Mecoptera (Scorpion-flies, hanging-flies) .......................................................................................16 Order Diptera (Two-winged flies) ..............................................................................................................16 Order Trichoptera (Caddisflies).................................................................................................................17 Order Lepidoptera (Moths)........................................................................................................................18 Order Hymenoptera (Wasps)....................................................................................................................18 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................................19 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS...................................................................................................................................44 Key to Keys online version INTRODUCTION This guide is a collation of the taxonomic literature that is available to identify invertebrates found in Australian inland waters. It aims to help inform biologists of the latest taxonomic literature, foster the use of recognised keys, add consistency to identifications, and high-light groups that need urgent taxonomic attention. This guide is intended to be a ready-reckoner guide to quickly find the appropriate identification keys and save hours searching for relevant taxonomic keys.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spatiotemporal Pattern of Phenology Across Geographic Gradients in Insects
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2017 Spatiotemporal pattern of phenology across geographic gradients in insects Khelifa, Rassim Abstract: Phenology – the timing of recurrent biological events – influences nearly all aspects of ecology and evolution. Phenological shifts have been recorded in a wide range of animals and plants worldwide during the past few decades. Although the phenological responses differ between taxa, they may also vary geographically, especially along gradients such as latitude or elevation. Since changes in phenology have been shown to affect ecology, evolution, human health and the economy, understanding pheno- logical shifts has become a priority. Although phenological shifts have been associated with changes in temperature, there is still little comprehension of the phenology-temperature relationship, particularly the mechanisms influencing its strength and the extent to which it varies geographically. Such ques- tions would ideally be addressed by combining controlled laboratory experiments on thermal response with long-term observational datasets and historical temperature records. Here, I used odonates (drag- onflies and damselflies) and Sepsid scavenger flies to unravel how temperature affects development and phenology at different latitudes and elevations. The main purpose of this thesis is to provide essential knowledge on the factors driving the spatiotemporal phenological dynamics by (1) investigating how phenology changed in time and space across latitude and elevation in northcentral Europe during the past three decades, (2) assessing potential temporal changes in thermal sensitivity of phenology and (3) describing the geographic pattern and usefulness of thermal performance curves in predicting natural responses.
    [Show full text]
  • Dragonfly Survey Report
    Moorebank Precinct West Threatened Dragonfly Species Survey Plan Report Part 4, Division 4.1, State Significant Development September 2016 TACTICAL GROUP MOOREBANK PRECINCT WEST Threatened Dragonfly Species Survey Plan Report Author Adam Costenoble Checker Kate Carroll Approver Ketan Patel Report No 001 Date 26/09/2016 Revision Text Final This report has been prepared for Tactical Group in accordance with the terms and conditions of appointment for AA009335 dated July 2016. Arcadis Australia Pacific Pty Limited (ABN 76 104 485 289) cannot accept any responsibility for any use of or reliance on the contents of this report by any third party. REVISIONS Prepared Approved Revision Date Description by by Adam 001 26/09/16 For submission to DPI Fisheries Ketan Patel Costenoble V i CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Project Overview ................................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Purpose of this report ......................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Aims of this Report ............................................................................................................. 3 1.4 Consultation .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Position of and Generic Distinction Between
    Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKZOJZoological Journal of the Linnean Society0024-4082The Lin- nean Society of London, 2004? 2004 140? 469486 Original Article TAXONOMY OF PAREPACTOPHANES AND TAUROCLETODES S. KARAYTUError! Bookmark not defined. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004, 140, 469–486. With 9 figures and R. HUYS Taxonomic position of and generic distinction between Parepactophanes Kunz, 1935 and Taurocletodes Kunz, 1975 (Copepoda, Canthocamptidae incertae sedis), with description of a new species from the Black Sea SÜPHAN KARAYTUGˇ 1 and RONY HUYS FLS2* 1Balıkesir Üniversitesi, Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi, Biyoloji Bölümü, 10100, Balıkesir, Turkey 2Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK Received March 2003; accepted for publication October 2003 Both sexes of a new species of Taurocletodes Kunz, 1975 (Copepoda, Harpacticoida, Canthocamptidae incertae sedis) are described from sandy beaches along the Black Sea coast of Turkey. The genus Taurocletodes is removed from its synonymy with Parepactophanes Kunz, 1935 and re-instated as a valid genus, accommodating the type species T. dubius (Noodt, 1958) comb. nov. and T. tumenae sp. nov. Both genera can be differentiated by major differences in the segmentation of P1–P3 endopods, the absence/presence of penicillate setae on P1 endopod, the number of outer spines on P2–P4 exp-3, the armature of P2–P4 endopods and the sexual dimorphism of P2 endopod and P3 exopod. T. tumenae sp. nov. and T. dubius are morphologically very similar, differing in morphometric characters related to the endopodal segmentation of P1 and P4, and armature of the male P5. The controversial taxonomic status of Pare- pactophanes and Taurocletodes within the family Canthocamptidae is discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Adam's Emerald Dragonfly
    Adam’s Emerald Dragonfly - Archaeophya adamsi December 2013, Primefact 187, Third edition Fisheries Ecosystems Unit, Port Stephens Fisheries Institute Description The Adam’s Emerald Dragonfly (also called Horned Urfly) is a moderately large, robust Dragonfly. Larvae grow to about 23mm in length and have a large two-lobed frontal plate on the head (see Figure 1), which distinguishes them from any other species found in NSW. The adults have a brown-black body with yellow markings, and a slight green or bluish metallic reflection on some parts. The abdomen length is around 46 mm and wingspan around 75 mm. Habitat and ecology Adam’s Emerald Dragonfly larvae have been Figure 1: Adult Adam’s Emerald Dragonfly (Photo: found in narrow, shaded riffle zones with CSIRO Entomology) and larva (Photo: J. Hawking, moss and abundant riparian vegetation (often Line drawing: G. Theischinger) closed canopy) in small to moderate sized creeks with gravel or sandy bottoms. Introduction All dragonflies are predatory. The larvae stalk or ambush aquatic prey while the adults The Adam’s Emerald Dragonfly (Archaeophya capture prey while flying. adamsi Fraser) is one of Australia’s rarest Adam’s Emerald Dragonfly larvae may live, in dragonflies. Only a small number of adults have particular cases, up to 7 years and undergo ever been collected, and the species is only various moults before metamorphosing into known from a few sites in the greater Sydney adults. Adults are thought to live for a few region. Some remaining areas of habitat are months at most. under threat from urban, industrial and agricultural development.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Trophic Analysis of Three Species of Marilia (Trichoptera
    Revista de Biología Tropical ISSN: 0034-7744 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica Reynag, María Celina; Rueda Martín, Paola Alejandra Trophic analysis of three species of Marilia (Trichoptera: Odontoceridae) from the neotropics Revista de Biología Tropical, vol. 62, núm. 2, junio-, 2014, pp. 543-550 Universidad de Costa Rica San Pedro de Montes de Oca, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44931383011 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Trophic analysis of three species of Marilia (Trichoptera: Odontoceridae) from the neotropics María Celina Reynaga & Paola Alejandra Rueda Martín CONICET, Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical (IBN), Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina; [email protected], [email protected] Received 05-VI-2013. Corrected 10-X-2013. Accepted 15-XI-2013. Abstract: The trophic ecology of the aquatic insect fauna has been widely studied for the Northern temperate zone. However, the taxa originally classified within a given particular trophic group in temperate ecosystems, do not necessarily exhibit the same dietary profile beyond its geographic limits. Since, the trophic ecology of caddisfly larvae is largely incomplete in the Neotropical Region, the present work aims to describe feed- ing habits inferred from quantitative analysis of data taxonomically resolved at the species level. For this, the feeding habits of three Trichoptera species Marilia cinerea, M.
    [Show full text]
  • A Check List of Gerromorpha (Hemiptera) from India
    Rec. zool. Surv. India: 100 (Part 1-2) : 55-97, 2002 A CHECK LIST OF GERROMORPHA (HEMIPTERA) FROM INDIA G. THIRUMALAI Zoological Survey of India, Southern Regional Station, Chennai 600 028. INTRODUCflON The Infraorder Gerromorpha comprises of semi-aquatic bugs characterised by long conspicuous antennae, longer than head and inserted in front of eyes. They are distributed in all kinds of climatic zones, except the coldest and driest parts. This infraorder contains 8 families namely, Gerridae, Veliidae, Hydrometridae, Mesoveliidae, Hebridae, Macroveliidae, Paraphrynoveliidae and Hennatobatidae (Andersen, 1982a). Knowledge of Indian semi-aquatic Hemiptera is limited to the taxonomic preliminaries, recording species from different parts of the country. (Distant, 1903a; 1910 a&b; Annandale, 1919; Bergroth, 1915a; Paiva, 1919a & b; Dover, 1928; Hafiz & Mathai, 1938; Hafiz & Riberio, 1939; Hafiz & Pradhan, 1947; Pradhan, 1950a, b& 1975; Gupta, 1981; Selvanayagam, 1981; Roy et al. 1988; Ghosh et al. 1989; Polhenlus & Starmuhlner, 1990; Bal & Basu, 1994 & 1997; Chen & Zettel, 1999). The revisionary work of Andersen (1975, 1980, 1990 & 1993); Den Boer (1969); Hungerford & Matsuda (1958a & b, 1960, 1962b & 1965); Herring (1961); Polhemus & Andersen (1984); Andersen & Foster (1992); Andersen & Chen (1993); Chen & Nieser (1993a & b); Polhemus & Karunaratne (1993); Polhemus (1994); Polhemus & Polhemus (1994 & 1995a) on a few genera of Gerridae; Lundblad (1936) on the genera Rhagovelia Mayr and Tetraripis Lundblad; Andersen (1981 b, 1983 & 1989); Polhemus
    [Show full text]
  • NOTES on WATER BUGS from SOUTH EAST ASIA and AUSTRALIA (Heteroptera: Nepomorpha & Gerromorpha)
    F. M. BUZZETTI, N. NIESER & J. DAMGAARD: Notes on water bugs ... 31 FILIPPO MARIA BUZZETTI, NICO NIESER & JAKOB DAMGAARD NOTES ON WATER BUGS FROM SOUTH EAST ASIA AND AUSTRALIA (Heteroptera: Nepomorpha & Gerromorpha) ABSTRACT - BUZZETTI F.M., NIESER N. & DAMGAARD J., 2006 - Notes on water bugs from South East Asia and Australia (Heteroptera: Nepomorpha & Gerromorpha). Atti Acc. Rov. Agiati, a. 256, 2006, ser. VIII, vol. VI, B: 31-45. Faunistical data on some Nepomorpha and Gerromorpha from South East Asia and Australia are given. Hydrometra greeni Kirk., Limnogonus (Limnogonoides) pecto- ralis Mayr and Halobates sp. are reported as new records for Myanmar. KEY WORDS - Faunistics. RIASSUNTO - BUZZETTI F.M., NIESER N. & DAMGAARD J., 2006 - Su alcuni Emitteri acquatici del Sud Est Asiatico e dellAustralia (Heteroptera: Nepomorpha & Gerro- morpha). Si riportano alcuni dati faunistici relativi a Nepomorfi e Gerromorfi dal Sud Est Asiatico e dallAustralia. Hydrometra greeni Kirk., Limnogonus (Limnogonoides) pecto- ralis Mayr e Halobates sp. sono per la prima volta citati per il Myanmar. PAROLE CHIAVE - Faunistica. INTRODUCTION In this publication the Nepomorpha and Gerromorpha from South East Asia and Australia presently in the F. M. B. private collection are reported. Some specimens transferred to the Nieser collection are indi- cated NCTN. Other data from the collection of the Zoological Muse- um of Copenhagen University are indicated as ZMUC. Some synony- my is abbraviated but can be found in the publications cited under the various species. When given, measurements are in mm. The collecting localities from Myanmar are shown in Map 1. 32 Atti Acc. Rov. Agiati, a. 256, 2006, ser.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Interesting Species of the Genus Elaphoidella Chappuis, 1929 (Crustacea, Copepoda) from Balkan Peninsula
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299467251 Two interesting species of the genus Elaphoidella Chappuis, 1929 (Crustacea, Copepoda) from Balkan Peninsula Article · August 1998 CITATIONS READS 6 49 1 author: Tomislav Karanovic University of Tasmania 95 PUBLICATIONS 1,272 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Discovery of indigenous species in Korea View project All content following this page was uploaded by Tomislav Karanovic on 29 March 2016. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Memoires de Biospeologie, Tome XXV, 1998, p. 25-33. 25 TWO INTERESTING SPECIES OF THE GENUS ELAPHOIDELLA CHAPPUIS, 1929 (CRUSTACEA, COPEPODA) FROM BALKAN PENINSULA by Tomislav KARANOVIC* I - INTRODUCTION CHAPPUIS (1929) established the genus Elaphoidella, with E. elaphoides (Chappuis, 1924), as a type species. He separated new genus from the genus Cantkocamptus, and at that time genus Elaphoidella counted twenty-five species and subspecies. In the next few decades genus Elaphoidella rapidly enlarges, mostly because of the great number of subterranean species. Up to 1948, fifty-three species were known, and LANG (1948) classified them into ten groups, mainly on the basis of the shape of the bizarre transformed spines on male's Exp3P4. PETKOVSKI and BRANCELJ (1988) added one new (eleventh) group. The only problem with classification into groups is necessity of both sexes, while many species are described and known just as one sex (mostly female). One unsuccessful attempt of revision of the genus Elaphoidella was made by APOSTOLOV (1985). Maybe the most detailed critical annotation of that revision is given by REID (1990).
    [Show full text]
  • The Semiaquatic Hemiptera of Minnesota (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) Donald V
    The Semiaquatic Hemiptera of Minnesota (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) Donald V. Bennett Edwin F. Cook Technical Bulletin 332-1981 Agricultural Experiment Station University of Minnesota St. Paul, Minnesota 55108 CONTENTS PAGE Introduction ...................................3 Key to Adults of Nearctic Families of Semiaquatic Hemiptera ................... 6 Family Saldidae-Shore Bugs ............... 7 Family Mesoveliidae-Water Treaders .......18 Family Hebridae-Velvet Water Bugs .......20 Family Hydrometridae-Marsh Treaders, Water Measurers ...22 Family Veliidae-Small Water striders, Rime bugs ................24 Family Gerridae-Water striders, Pond skaters, Wherry men .....29 Family Ochteridae-Velvety Shore Bugs ....35 Family Gelastocoridae-Toad Bugs ..........36 Literature Cited ..............................37 Figures ......................................44 Maps .........................................55 Index to Scientific Names ....................59 Acknowledgement Sincere appreciation is expressed to the following individuals: R. T. Schuh, for being extremely helpful in reviewing the section on Saldidae, lending specimens, and allowing use of his illustrations of Saldidae; C. L. Smith for reading the section on Veliidae, checking identifications, and advising on problems in the taxon­ omy ofthe Veliidae; D. M. Calabrese, for reviewing the section on the Gerridae and making helpful sugges­ tions; J. T. Polhemus, for advising on taxonomic prob­ lems and checking identifications for several families; C. W. Schaefer, for providing advice and editorial com­ ment; Y. A. Popov, for sending a copy ofhis book on the Nepomorpha; and M. C. Parsons, for supplying its English translation. The University of Minnesota, including the Agricultural Experi­ ment Station, is committed to the policy that all persons shall have equal access to its programs, facilities, and employment without regard to race, creed, color, sex, national origin, or handicap. The information given in this publication is for educational purposes only.
    [Show full text]
  • About the Book the Format Acknowledgments
    About the Book For more than ten years I have been working on a book on bryophyte ecology and was joined by Heinjo During, who has been very helpful in critiquing multiple versions of the chapters. But as the book progressed, the field of bryophyte ecology progressed faster. No chapter ever seemed to stay finished, hence the decision to publish online. Furthermore, rather than being a textbook, it is evolving into an encyclopedia that would be at least three volumes. Having reached the age when I could retire whenever I wanted to, I no longer needed be so concerned with the publish or perish paradigm. In keeping with the sharing nature of bryologists, and the need to educate the non-bryologists about the nature and role of bryophytes in the ecosystem, it seemed my personal goals could best be accomplished by publishing online. This has several advantages for me. I can choose the format I want, I can include lots of color images, and I can post chapters or parts of chapters as I complete them and update later if I find it important. Throughout the book I have posed questions. I have even attempt to offer hypotheses for many of these. It is my hope that these questions and hypotheses will inspire students of all ages to attempt to answer these. Some are simple and could even be done by elementary school children. Others are suitable for undergraduate projects. And some will take lifelong work or a large team of researchers around the world. Have fun with them! The Format The decision to publish Bryophyte Ecology as an ebook occurred after I had a publisher, and I am sure I have not thought of all the complexities of publishing as I complete things, rather than in the order of the planned organization.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Etymology of the Dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata) Named by R.J. Tillyard, F.R.S
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The University of Sydney: Sydney eScholarship Journals online Etymology of the Dragonfl ies (Insecta: Odonata) named by R.J. Tillyard, F.R.S. IAN D. ENDERSBY 56 Looker Road, Montmorency, Vic 3094 ([email protected]) Published on 23 April 2012 at http://escholarship.library.usyd.edu.au/journals/index.php/LIN Endersby, I.D. (2012). Etymology of the dragonfl ies (Insecta: Odonata) named by R.J. Tillyard, F.R.S. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 134, 1-16. R.J. Tillyard described 26 genera and 130 specifi c or subspecifi c taxa of dragonfl ies from the Australasian region. The etymology of the scientifi c name of each of these is given or deduced. Manuscript received 11 December 2011, accepted for publication 16 April 2012. KEYWORDS: Australasia, Dragonfl ies, Etymology, Odonata, Tillyard. INTRODUCTION moved to another genus while 16 (12%) have fallen into junior synonymy. Twelve (9%) of his subspecies Given a few taxonomic and distributional have been raised to full species status and two species uncertainties, the odonate fauna of Australia comprises have been relegated to subspecifi c status. Of the 325 species in 113 genera (Theischinger and Endersby eleven subspecies, or varieties or races as Tillyard 2009). The discovery and naming of these dragonfl ies sometimes called them, not accounted for above, fi ve falls roughly into three discrete time periods (Table 1). are still recognised, albeit four in different genera, During the fi rst of these, all Australian Odonata were two are no longer considered as distinct subspecies, referred to European experts, while the second era and four have disappeared from the modern literature.
    [Show full text]