Maidstone & Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Pembury

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Maidstone & Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Pembury JOINT EASTERN AND WESTERN AREA PLANNING COMMITTEE MONDAY 3 SEPTEMBER 2012 REPORT OF THE HEAD OF PLANNING SERVICES APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION APPLICANT REFERENCE LOCATION PROPOSAL CONTACT ADDRESS DATE VALID GRID REFERENCE DATE OF APPLICATION MAIDSTONE AND TW/11/01740 Maidstone & Removal of Condition 29 of TUNBRIDGE WELLS Tunbridge Wells NHS TW/10/02250 for the NHS TRUST Trust redevelopment of the existing (David Hicken Pembury Hospital Pembury Hospital for 512 bed, Associates Planning Tonbridge Road approx 65,500msq district general Eclipse House PEMBURY hospital, 984 car parking spaces, Eclipse Park PE improvements to the public Sittingbourne Road highway, new site access, Maidstone servicing, landscaping and Kent associated works/plant equipment ME14 3EN) and replacement with Planning Obligation to secure an amended bus service to service to the hospital. 21/06/11 561471/141407 13/06/11 1.0 DESCRIPTION OF SITE 1.01 The application site lies outside of the Limits to Built Development and within the Metropolitan Green Belt. It is situated adjacent to the High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. The site is a Major Development Site as defined by the Tunbridge Wells Borough Local Plan 2006. 1.02 The site is occupied by the Tunbridge Wells Hospital, which was granted permission under reference TW/07/02595. This development is now complete and has been open since September 2011. Two additional car parks have also been provided in addition to this permission. These are located at a higher level than the hospital. One car park is located to the south west of the site and lies adjacent to the Listed Chapel. The other car park is located to the north east of the site. 1.03 The application site, previously Pembury Hospital, provided for a number of outpatient facilities and also the maternity unit. The main hospital Kent and Sussex, which carried out the main services for the Trust was located close to Tunbridge Wells Town Centre and was within walking distance of a number of modes of transport. The main hospital and all its functions and facilities have now moved over to the new hospital at the application site. This site is over 2 miles away from the Town Centre, in a more remote location and not near a variety of transport nodes. 2.0 PROPOSAL 2.01 Planning permission is sought to remove condition 29 of the original planning permission that was amended under planning application TW/10/02250 and currently requires the following: “No part of phase 1(B) of the development hereby permitted shall be occupied until such time as a Bus Plan to facilitate access to the site by buses, to include the following matters, has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority and has been implemented and the new services have been in operation for at least 21 days. The bus plan shall include: (a) A regular bus services for staff, patients and visitors to the hospital. (b) The services shall provide, as a minimum, the following: (i) A service to and from Tunbridge Wells town centre, calling at Pembury Road, Tunbridge Wells Station, High Brooms and Longfield Road, at an average frequency of 3 buses per hour, (ii) A service to and from Tonbridge town centre, calling at Tonbridge Station and Tonbridge High Street, including Hadlow, West Malling and Borough Green at an average frequency of 2 buses per hour, (iii) A service to and from Crowborough town centre, calling at Tunbridge Wells station, at a frequency of 1 bus per hour, and (iv) A service to and from Maidstone Town Centre, calling at Paddock Wood, Maidstone East Station, Maidstone High Street and Maidstone Hospital, at a frequency of 1 bus per hour. (c) All services shall operate between 0600hrs and 2300hrs on every day throughout the year. (Frequencies may be reduced on Public Holidays.) (d) Details of routes, stops and service frequencies. (e) The start of the services shall coincide with the opening of phase 1 (B) of the development and will run for a period of at least 5 years thereafter. (f) The Bus Plan shall provide for monitoring and annual review of the effectiveness of the services and for variation thereof, subject to written agreement with the Local Planning Authority. Has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning authority, in consultation with the Highway Agency and Kent County Council. Reason: To provide suitable traffic management policies which aim to reduce the use of the private car in accordance with Policy TP1 of the Local Plan”. 2.02 The main reason for this condition was for the NHS Trust to establish viable bus services to the hospital. In the early stages, bus services are rarely viable and the applicant was requested to help these services build up so at the end of the 5 year period they were likely to become viable and remain so. 2.03 It is proposed to replace this condition with a Section 106 Legal Agreement which seeks to secure the following: That the NHS Trust will provide funding sufficient to ensure the continuing operation of the Bus Services. This provision will continue until the first of the following occurs: - The expiry of 5 years from the Opening Date of the Hospital (19.09.11); - The date upon which the Owner has provided funding in accordance with this agreement totalling not less than two million one hundred thousand pounds (£2,100,000)] which shall include such sums of money as have already paid by the Owner to Kent County Council and Arriva Southern Counties during the period between the Opening Date of the Hospital and the date of `this permission if granted; or - The Bus Services becoming financially viable such that they generate sufficient revenue from ticket sales to the public to no longer require subsidy. 2.04 These commitments are put forward in the Legal Agreement provided that the total Financial Contributions paid by the NHS Trust towards bus service provision does not exceed £2,100,000. It has been confirmed that since the opening of the hospital in September 2011 over £522,000 has been invested in providing bus services and in addition significant contributions have been made to the voluntary sector in the outlying areas where the Trust have made funds available for the next three years. 2.05 The proposed S106 legal agreement aims to secure an improvement in the provision of buses to serve the following routes: • Route 1 – Tunbridge Wells Hospital to Tunbridge Wells Town Centre • Route 2 – Tunbridge Wells Hospital to Tonbridge Town Centre 2.06 The application also provides details of the routes, stops and service frequencies for these routes. This includes: Bus Route Stops Times 217 T Wells Station, T Wells High Street, Monday-Friday -0644– Hospital, Weald of Kent School and 2010 Tonbridge Town Centre. Saturday – 0746 - 1940 No Sundays 208,209,278 Henwood Green, Pembury Camden Monday-Friday -0600– Arms, T Wells Town Centre, Sherwood, 2309 Hospital, Hill View School, Weald of Saturdays – 0815 - Kent School, Goldsmid Road, Tonbridge 2259 Town Centre, Cage Green, Higham Sundays – 0811 - Wood, Golden Green, East Peckam. 2315 2.07 This means that the following routes laid out in the original condition would no longer be secured: (i) A service including Hadlow, West Malling and Borough Green at an average frequency of 2 buses per hour, (ii) A service to and from Crowborough town centre, calling at Tunbridge Wells station, at a frequency of 1 bus per hour, and (iii) A service to and from Maidstone Town Centre, calling at Paddock Wood, Maidstone East Station, Maidstone High Street and Maidstone Hospital, at a frequency of 1 bus per hour. 2.08 To support this application, the applicant, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust have provided the following information: A Viability Statement. Details of the bus services proposed including routes and frequencies. Hospital Staff address maps. Bus passenger demand analysis. A draft Legal Agreement. 2.09 As part of their submission the applicants also make clear that the viability report, along with KCC and independent operators, conclude that the provision of a bus service running from the hospital to Hadlow, West Malling and Borough Green would be unviable. To address this and to accord with the requirements of condition 29, the Trust has set up a funding structure to help support the Voluntary Sector which serves the outer lying areas to assist in accessibility to the hospital. The draft S106 legal agreement has been amended since submission of the application to include this commitment. 2.10 In addition to this, it is also important to note, that whilst the provision of the Bus Services is being resolved, the NHS have been providing funding for a number of bus services identified by Kent County Council. These have been operational since the full opening of the hospital in September 2011. 2.11 Furthermore whilst this application relates to the removal of condition 29 and its replacement with a Legal Agreement, it does in effect grant a whole new planning application for the hospital development. (Note – This means that the Local Planning Authority is technically required to reiterate all the conditions that relate to the original permission for the Hospital in the decision notice for this application should it be granted). 2.12 The application is being presented to the Joint Planning Committee in accordance with the scheme of delegation as the condition was placed on the original ) and amended applications (TW/07/02595 and TW/10/2250 respectively) by the Committee. 3.0 RELEVANT HISTORY Planning permission has been approved for the following: 3.01 TW/02/00333 – Outline (means of access and siting not reserved) – General Hospital, Mental Health Unit, associated staff accommodation, car parking and associated junction improvements.
Recommended publications
  • Burgess Hill, Tunbridge Wells (Refs: 2126410 and 2127645, 1 May 2014)
    James Henderson Jon Griffiths Planning Casework Division Deputy Director Department for Communities and Local Government Strategic Roads Directorate Zone 1/H1 Eland House Department for Transport Bressenden Place Great Minster House London SW1E 5DU 33 Horseferry Road London SW1P 4DR 1 May 2014 Addressee as on envelope Dear Sir or Madam HIGHWAYS ACT 1980 ACQUISITION OF LAND ACT 1981 PLANNING (LISTED BUILDINGS AND CONSERVATION AREAS) ACT 1990 – SECTION 12 A21 TONBRIDGE TO PEMBURY DUALLING 1. We are directed by the Secretary of State for Transport and the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (“the Secretaries of State”) to refer to the concurrent public inquiries (“the Inquiry”) that sat for a total of 13 days between14 May 2013 and 9 July 2013 before Jane V Stiles BSC(Hons) Arch DipArch RIBA DipLA CMLI PhD MRTPI an independent Inspector appointed by the Secretaries of State, to hear objections to, and representations about, the following draft orders and applications for Listed Buildings Consent: Draft Orders THE A21 TRUNK ROAD (TONBRIDGE TO PEMBURY DUALLING) ORDER 20.. (“the TRO”) THE A21 TRUNK ROAD (TONBRIDGE TO PEMBURY DUALLING) (DETRUNKING) ORDER 20.. (“the DO”) THE A21 TRUNK ROAD (TONBRIDGE TO PEMBURY DUALLING SIDE ROADS) ORDER 20.. (“the SRO”) 1 THE A21 TRUNK ROAD (TONBRIDGE TO PEMBURY DUALLING) COMPULSARY PURCHASE ORDER 20.. (“the CPO”) THE A21 TRUNK ROAD (TONBRIDGE BYPASS TO PEMBURY BYPASS DUALLING) ORDER 1996 (REVOCATION) ORDER 20.. (“the TRREO”) THE A21 TRUNK ROAD (TONBRIDGE BYPASS TO PEMBURY BYPASS DUALLING SIDE ROADS) ORDER 1996 (REVOCATION) ORDER 20.. (“the SRREO”) THE A21 TRUNK ROAD (TONBRIDGE BYPASS TO PEMBURY BYPASS DUALLING SLIP ROADS) ORDER 1996 (REVOCATION) ORDER 20.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Tunbridge Wells Urban Design Framework
    Tunbridge Wells Borough Local Plan ROYAL TUNBRIDGE WELLS URBAN DESIGN FRAMEWORK PART 1: PRINCIPLES Consultation Draft (v8) December 2014 Foreword The Borough Council’s Five Year Plan sets out a range of proposals and key projects over the next five years. The production of this Urban Design Framework forms a part in achieving this Vision. The aim of this Framework is to set out the attributes of the town of Royal Tunbridge Wells and to provide a wider long term perspective of where the town wants to be. The Framework and other associated guidance aims to ensure that all future work in the public realm and on development sites in the town will comply with a coherent plan and support a consistency in design and quality, and to maintain local distinctiveness. We are therefore confident that this Framework will give all parties guidance in achieving this and to work towards a town that is attractive, vibrant and viable. Contents 1 Introduction 1.1 Background 1.2 Purpose 1.3 Approach and scope 2 Policy context 2.1 National and Strategic policy 2.2 Connected documents and strategies 2.3 Status of the Urban Design Framework 2.4 Consultation 2.5 Implementation and Phasing 3 Context & Overview 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Movement 3.3 Distinctive Quarters 3.4 Townscape 3.5 Street Detail 4 Key Issues (Objectives, vision) 4.1 Assets 4.2 Issues to address 4.3 Objectives 5 Framework 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Movement Framework/Street Hierarchy 5.3 Public Realm Framework 5.4 Development Framework 6 General policy & Design issues 6.1 Development Policy 6.2 Area specific Policy 6.3 Site specific Policy 6.4 Topic based Policies 7 Delivery & Implementation 7.1 Relationship to other policy 7.2 Funding 7.3 Phasing Draft ROYAL TUNBRIDGE WELLS: URBAN DESIGN FRAMEWORK ROYAL TUNBRIDGLWELLS HRBAN_DESIGN_EBAMEWORK 1 Introduction 1.1 Background 1.1.1 Royal Tunbridge Wells is a town of historic significance, located in an area of outstanding character.
    [Show full text]
  • Warders Medical Centre the History of a Practice in Tonbridge and Penshurst 1808-2021
    1 Warders Medical Centre The History of a practice in Tonbridge and Penshurst 1808-2021 David MG Goodridge 2 This is the story of the Warders medical practice as it has evolved in step with the developments in medical care and the way in which it has been delivered over the past two centuries. Although it has been produced primarily for the patients of Warders Medical Centre and local residents, we feel it may also be of interest to other general practices and medical historians. We were surprised at the variety and depth of our own history which includes: · The first description of a rare form of epilepsy. · · A Victorian polymath whose research interests included the weights of human teeth and the study of shells and the compound eyes of insects. · · Research leading to an alteration in the UK Driving Regulations for patients with epilepsy. We hope this site will encourage other practices to research and publish their own histories and perhaps produce a virtual history of general practice. Page Number 1. Early days 1815-1894. West and Gorham 4 Changes in General Medical Practice 5 2. William James West 1793-1848 7 West Syndrome 7 Two successful treatments 9 3. John Gorham 1814 -1899 9 Teeth 11 Optics and other interests 11 4. Eyre Ievers 1846-1926 13 5. Post Gorham (1894) to 1948 16 6. Isaac Newton 1867-1955 17 Three unusual case 18 7. Gerald Lantsbery Bunting 1877-1953 19 8. 121 High Street 1920-1963 20 3 9. Ashley Ernest Herman 1887-1957 21 10. Theodore Stanley Dewey 1902-1978 22 11.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wells Free School 12
    Free Schools in 2013 Application form Mainstream and 16-19 Free Schools Completing your application Before completing your application, please ensure that you have read the ‘How to Apply’ guidance carefully (which can be found here) and can provide all the information and documentation we have asked for – failure to do so may mean that we are unable to consider your application. The Free School application is made up of nine sections as follows: Section A: Applicant details and declaration Section B: Outline of the school Section C: Education vision Section D: Education plan Section E: Evidence of demand and marketing Section F: Capacity and capability Section G: Initial costs and financial viability Section H: Premises Section I: Due diligence and other checks In Sections A-H we are asking you to tell us about you and the school you want to establish and this template has been designed for this purpose. The boxes provided in each section will expand as you type. Section G requires you to provide two financial plans. To achieve this you must fill out and submit the templates provided here. Section I is about your suitability to run a Free School. There is a separate downloadable form for this information. This is available here You need to submit all the information requested in order for your application to be assessed. Sections A-H and the financial plans need to be submitted to the Department for Education by the application deadline. You need to submit one copy (of each) by email to: Redacted . If there is any additional information that you wish to submit as part of your application please add it to the annexes section at the end of this template.
    [Show full text]
  • PB26906 IDOH Oct 05
    International medical insurance International Directory of Hospitals What you need to know April 2010 INTERNATIONAL Your AXA PPP healthcare International Directory of Hospitals Welcome Welcome to your AXA PPP healthcare International Directory of Hospitals listing those hospitals worldwide with which AXA PPP healthcare has a direct settlement agreement. This directory forms part of the terms of your policy. Wherever you are in the world, your directory will help you and your medical practitioner select a hospital should you need in-patient or day-patient treatment. Please keep it in a convenient place in case you need it. This information is also available on our website at: www.axappphealthcare.com Help us to help you AXA PPP healthcare is actively seeking to increase the extent of our direct settlement service. If you are aware of any hospitals that may be candidates for this direct settlement programme please send us their details. 2 Contents Section Page This section explains number 1 Introduction 4 • The International Directory of Hospitals. • How to use your Directory. • How to arrange direct settlement. 5 • What happens with out-patient treatment. 6 • Third party local knowledge. 2 International Directory • Where you can receive treatment in of Hospitals the following parts of the world: 8 • Caribbean. 9 • Central America. 10 • South America. 11 • North America. 12 • Africa. 13 • Asia. 17 • Australasia. 18 • Europe. 34 • Middle East. 3 UK Directory 37 • Information about our UK network of Hospitals of hospitals. 38 • Key to symbols. 40 • Facilities 3 1 Introduction The International Directory of Hospitals Your International Directory of Hospitals lists all the hospitals worldwide with which AXA PPP healthcare has what is known as a ‘direct settlement’ agreement and those in the UK covered by your policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Tunbridge Wells Town Forum
    Minutes of Meeting dated Thursday 25 October 2007 1. Present: Jenny Alexander (Rusthall Village Assocition), Daniel Bech (Telephone House Neighbours’ Association), Jenny Blackburn (Rusthall Village Association), Graham Bradley (Hanover and Rock Villa Residents’ Association), John Cunningham (Royal Tunbridge Wells Civic Society), Betsey Dix (Calverley Park Crescent Freeholders’ Association), John Goodfellow (Banner Farm Residents’ Association), Matt Goodwin (Village Residents’ Association), John Higgs (Hanover Road and Rock Villa Association), Michael Holman (Tunbridge Wells Twinning and Friendship Association), Michael Larsen (Friends of the Grove), George Lawson (Inner London Road Residents’ Association), Ian Naismith (Hanover and Rock Villa Association), Altan Omer (Benhall Mill Road Land Association), Kate Sergeant (Clarence Road Users’ Association), Alastair Tod (Royal Tunbridge Wells Civic Society), Christopher Thomas (The Goodwins Nos.1&2 Residents’ Company), Mary Wardrop (Hawkenbury Village Association), David Webster (Clarence Road Users’ Association), Philip Whitbourn (Beulah Road Residents’ Association) and Tricia Wright (Calverley Park Association). - Councillors Barry Edwards and James Scholes. 2. Apologies: Michael Doyle (Hawkenbury Village Association), Richard Gould (Calverley Park Crescent Freeholders’ Association), Keith Perry (Benhall Mill Road Land Association), Simon Smith (Inner London Road Residents’ Association), Chris Weller (Calverley Park Association) - Councillors Roy Bullock, Mrs Barbara Cobbold, Lesley Herriot, Mrs Catherine Mayhew, John Miller, Leonard Price, Frank Williams. ------------------------------------------------------ 3. Appointment of Chair and Vice-Chair Christopher Thomas and Jenny Blackburn were elected Chair and Vice-Chair of the Town Forum, respectively. Michael Larsen proposed Christopher Thomas as Chair and was seconded by John Higgs. Matt Goodwin proposed Jenny Blackburn as Vice-Chair and was seconded by John Goodfellow. (Matt Goodwin in the Chair for the duration of the meeting) 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Report and Recommendations
    1 Tunbridge Wells Town Plan Advisory Panel Report and Recommendations Presented to TUNBRIDGE WELLS BOROUGH COUNCIL July 2012 2 FOREWORD It is now around eight months since I set up the Tunbridge Wells Town Plan Panel with the purpose of better informing the debate on the future development of the town. Some finger crossing was needed at first since the exercise was new to all those involved, and required some pretty basic blue sky thinking. However, I am delighted that we are now able to publish our views, based on the consensus of the majority of the Panel members. Looking back, I feel privileged to have been part of a group of people who have shown such dedication and have given up so much of their time to the task. There will be those, no doubt, who will question the composition of the Panel and indeed its competence or mandate for doing this work. The choice of members was initially mine, and whilst I made every effort to ensure a balanced selection of skills and demographics, I was always aware that this could never be entirely perfect, and would be inevitably open to challenge. Despite this, however, I remain confident that the result is a valid and useful contribution to the consultation process. In particular, the thinking has been from the bottom up, starting with a clean sheet and few pre-conceived ideas. It is probable that the result may not be seen as dramatic, but I am convinced that it will prove to be of considerable significance in further informing the Borough Council's consultation on the Tunbridge Wells town centre plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservators Minutes 1994 – 1999
    TUNBRIDGE WELTS COMMONS CONSERVATORS Thursday 6 January 1994 Present: Councillors Mrs Braam, Mrs Hilling, Sayer and Scholes Hrs Kentner Nessrs Butt, Chapman, Girling, Hicks and Sander Patrick Shovelton (Friends of Tunbridge Wells and Rusthall Commons) attended by invitation APPOINTMENT OF CHAIRMAN 1. The present Chairman, Mr Gordon Butt, reminded the Conservators that, in accordance with the Third Schedule of the County of Kent Act 1981 they were required at the first meeting held on are after 1 January each year to appoint a Chairman for the ensuing year. RESOLVED - That Councillor Scholes, representative of the Borough Council; be appointed as Chairman until the next annual meeting in 1995. COUNCITJDR SCHOLES IN THE CHAIR The Conservators placed on record their appreciation of Mr Butt's enthusiasm and service as Chairman over the last year. MEMBERSHIP 2. The Clerk reported the appointment of the Commons Conservators, in accordance with the provisions of Section 104 of the County of Kent Act 1981, as follows:- Representing the Lord of the Manor - Mrs G K Kentner Mr M J H Girling Mr C Hall Mr J Hicks Representing the Freehold Tenants - Mr G Butt I Mr M Chapman Mr M Sander One vacancy Representing the Borough Council - Councillor Mrs Braam Councillor Mrs Hilling Councillor Sayer Councillor Scholes APPOINTMENT OF COMMITTEE 3. The Clerk reported the appointment of the Committee for the ensuing year: - Representing the Lord of the Manor - Mr J Hicks Representing the Freehold Tenants - Mr M Chapman Representing the Borough Council - Councillor Sayer Councillor Scholes, as Chairman of the Conservators, was ex officio a member of the Committee for the ensuing year.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservators Minutes 2007 – 2014
    TUNBRIDGE WELLS COMMONS CONSERVATORS Thursday 25 January 2007 Present: Councillors Scholes and Wakefield Messrs Butler, Hall, Chapman, Butt, Freeman and Marshall Baron Nicolas van den Branden Mrs Jennifer Blackburn (Friends of Tunbridge Wells and Rusthall Common) attended by invitation. Katharina Mahler-Bech (observing) Apologies for absence were received from Sue Potts and Councillor Mrs Cobbold MINUTES 1. APPOINTMENT OF CHAIRMAN In accordance with the third schedule of the County of Kent Act 1982 it was noted that the Conservators were required at the first meeting held on or after 1 January each year to appoint a Chairman for the ensuing year. RESOLVED – That Geoff Butler, representative of the Manor of Rusthall, be appointed as Chairman until the annual meeting of the Conservators in January 2008. MR BUTLER IN THE CHAIR The Clerk thanked Councillor Wakefield on behalf of the Conservators and Officers for his year as Chairman and expressed their gratitude to him for holding the fort during a difficult and interesting year. 2. MEMBERSHIP The Chairman reported that the under mentioned Conservators had been appointed by the bodies specified to serve for the period indicated. Tunbridge Wells Borough Council: Councillor Mrs Lewis ) Councillor Mrs Cobbold ) December 2006 to February 2008 Councillor Scholes ) Councillor Wakefield ) 144 Freehold Tenants: Mr G Butt ) Mr M Chapman ) 1st year of three year term until Mr P Freeman ) 31 December 2009 Mr I Marshall ) Manor of Rusthall: Baron Nicolas van den Branden ) Mr G Butler ) 1st year of three year term until Mr C Hall ) 31 December 2009 Mrs S Potts ) The Clerk introduced and welcomed Ian Marshall as the new Conservator nominated by the Freehold Tenants.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Royal Tunbridge Wells Town Forum
    Public Document Pack A G E N D A Thursday 21 May 2015 at 6.30 pm Council Chamber, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Kent TN1 1RS 1 Apologies 2 Membership changes a Membership applications To welcome a new member to the Town Forum: Tunbridge Wells Bicycle User Group (TWBUG), whose application has been approved by the Town Forum’s Management Committee. b Changes of representatives (for information) 3 Minutes of the previous meeting held on 26 March 2015 (Pages 1 - 10) 4 Actions from previous meeting (5 mins) 26 March 2015 4(e) Proposed holding company for managing residential properties Mike To e-mail a link to the 9 April Cabinet agenda to Town Forum McGeary members. This was done on 31 March. 5 TWBC’s Destination Management Plan Mike To circulate the current mini-guide to Town Forum members. This was McGeary incorporated into an all-member e-mail, dated 15 April. 9 Future of Millennium Clock Adam To take a lead in the provision of a policy statement from TWBC Chalmers regarding the future of the Millennium Clock. 9 ’20 is plenty’ road safety campaign Mike To circulate details of this road safety campaign and how local McGeary residents can become involved. Details of this road safety initiative were circulated to Town Forum members by e-mail on 13 May. 10 Roundabouts The e-mail sent to all members, dated 15 April, advised that a further update would be provided. A verbal report will be provided at the meeting. 10 Engaging new TWBC members A further report was to be given on plans to encourage newly-elected TWBC town ward members to become actively engaged with the Town Forum.
    [Show full text]
  • Redevelopment of Existing School Site to Provide a New Academy At
    SECTION D DEVELOPMENT TO BE CARRIED OUT BY THE COUNTY COUNCIL Background Documents - the deposited documents, views and representations received as referred to in the reports and included in the development proposal dossier for each case and also as might be additionally indicated. Item D1 Redevelopment of existing school site to provide a new Academy at The Skinners Kent Academy, Land East of Blackhurst Lane and between Sandown Park & Pembury Road, Tunbridge Wells – KCC/TW/0434/2010 A report by Head of Planning Applications Group to Planning Applications Committee on 15 March 2011. Application by Kent County Council Building Schools for the Future & Academies Team to redevelop the existing school site to provide a new 3/4 storey Academy; Alterations and additions to existing sports centre; Retention of existing CDT block; External provision of new floodlit all weather pitch on Site 2, 165 car parking spaces and 164 cycle spaces (to replace existing provision), an external amphitheatre, dining terrace and energy centre on Site 1; Relocation of floodlit Multi-Use Games Areas; Reconfiguration of bus set down area and the provision of hard and soft landscaping; The Skinners Kent Academy, Land East of Blackhurst Lane, and between Sandown Park & Pembury Road, Tunbridge Wells (KCC/TW/0434/2010). Recommendation: Planning permission be granted subject to conditions. Local Member: Mr. K. Lynes Classification: Unrestricted Mr. J. Scholes (adjoining Local Member) Site 1. The Skinners Kent Academy (SKA) comprises the existing buildings and grounds of the former Tunbridge Wells High School located to the east side of Tunbridge Wells. The site is located just north of the Pembury Road (A264), the main arterial route connecting Tunbridge Wells town centre with the A21, Pembury Village and other outlying villages further east of the town centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Tunbridge Wells Weekly List – Produced 29Th November 2019
    Tunbridge Wells Weekly List – Produced 29th November 2019 Attached is the latest list of applications received by the Council under the Town and Country Planning Acts. You may inspect a copy of any application on our online planning database or at the Weald Information Centre, The Old Fire Station, Stone Street, Cranbrook or at Gateway, 8 Grosvenor Road, Tunbridge Wells. You can make your comments online or by email to: [email protected] or in writing to Planning Services, Town Hall, Tunbridge Wells, Kent TN1 1RS. Applications with the following suffix: ADJ, AGRIC, COUNTY, CPD, DEMO, SUB, TELNOT, TCA, NMAND, EIASCR or EIASCO are for information only. If an application is a householder application, in the event that an appeal is made against a decision of the Council to refuse to grant planning permission for the proposed development, and that appeal then proceeds by way of the expedited procedure under the written representations procedure, any representations will be passed to the Secretary of State and there will be no opportunity to make further representation. Please be aware that any comments and your name and address will be placed on file, which will be available for public inspection and published in full on the Internet. We will not publish your signature, email address or phone number on our website. If you make any written comments we will notify you of the outcome of the application. We will not make a decision on any application referred to in this list before 21 days from the date when the application was registered as valid except for those with the following suffix: ADJ, AGRIC, COUNTY, CPD, DEMO, SUB, TELNOT, TCA, NMAND, EIASCR or EIASCO.
    [Show full text]