DOCSLIB.ORG

American Transmission Systems, Incorporated a Firstenergy Company

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
American Transmission Systems, Incorporated a Firstenergy Company AMERICAN TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED A FIRSTENERGY COMPANY CONSTRUCTION NOTICE JUNIPER-NEWBURGH / JUNIPER-JENNINGS & JUNIPER-PLEASANT VALLEY Q1 & Q2 138kV TRANSMISSION LINE STRUCTURE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OPSB CASE NO.: 20-1647-EL-BNR November 6, 2020 American Transmission Systems, Incorporated 76 South Main Street Akron, Ohio 44308 CONSTRUCTION NOTICE JUNIPER-NEWBURGH / JUNIPER-JENNINGS & JUNIPER-PLEASANT VALLEY Q1 & Q2 138 KV TRANSMISSION LINE STRUCTURE REPLACEMENT PROJECT The following information is being provided in accordance with the procedures in the Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) Chapter 4906-6 for the application and review of Accelerated Certificate Applications. Based upon the requirements found in Appendix A to OAC Rule 4906- 1-01, this Project qualifies for submittal to the Ohio Power Siting Board (“Board”) as a Construction Notice application. 4906-6-05: ACCELERATED APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS 4906-6-05: Name Name of Project: Juniper-Newburgh / Juniper-Jennings & Juniper-Pleasant Valley Q1 & Q2 138 kV Transmission Line Structure Replacement Project (“Project”). 4906-6-05 (B)(1): Brief Description of the Project In this Project, American Transmission Systems, Incorporated (“ATSI”), a FirstEnergy company, is proposing to replace existing double circuit steel lattice structure #2915 on the Juniper-Newburgh / Juniper-Jennings 138 kV Transmission Line, and replace existing double circuit steel lattice structure #2217 on the Juniper-Pleasant Valley Q1 & Q2 138 kV Transmission Line due to localized erosion along Tinker’s Creek. Both existing structures will be replaced with steel monopole structures set with concrete foundations. Recently, the geomorphology of Tinker’s Creek has changed significantly with the water channel shifting significantly due to erosion along the stream bank. To address the potential damage from the continued erosion to the existing structures, ATSI must replace the structures with steel monopole structures on concrete foundations designed to withstand flooding conditions. The new structures will be installed approximately 50- feet west of the existing structure positions along the existing centerline. Existing 1 American Transmission Systems, Incorporated Juniper-Newburgh / Juniper-Jennings & Juniper-Pleasant Valley Q1 & Q2 138kV Transmission Line Structure Replacement Project structures #2915 and #2217 are 92 feet and 90 feet in height, respectively. The new structures will each be approximately 100 feet in height. When installation of the new poles is complete, the existing structures will be demolished. The general location of the Project is shown in Exhibit 1 on a topographical overlay and in Exhibit 2 on an aerial overlay with imagery provided by ESRI. Exhibit 3 shows the general Project layout. The Project is located in the Village of Valley View, Cuyahoga County, Ohio. 4906-6-05 (B)(1): Letter of Notification Requirement The Project meets the requirements for a Construction Notice because the Project is within the types of projects defined by Item (2)(a) of the Application Requirement Matrix for Electric Power Transmission Lines, Appendix A of OAC Rule 4906-1-01. This item states: (2) Adding new circuits on existing structures designed for multiple circuit use, replacing conductors on existing structures with larger or bundled conductors, adding structures to an existing line or replacing structures with a different type of structure, for a distance of: (a) two miles or less The proposed Project is within the requirements of Item (2)(a) as it involves the replacement of two (2) existing steel lattice structures with two (2) steel monopole structures with concrete foundations in the existing right-of-way. 2 American Transmission Systems, Incorporated Juniper-Newburgh / Juniper-Jennings & Juniper-Pleasant Valley Q1 & Q2 138kV Transmission Line Structure Replacement Project 4906-6-05 (B)(2): Need for the Project The Project is needed to ensure the structural integrity of the transmission lines. The current rate of erosion along Tinker’s Creek is exposing the existing structure foundations. The proposed steel monopole structures with concrete foundations are designed to withstand flooding conditions. 4906-6-05 (B)(3): Location of the Project Relative to Existing or Proposed Lines The location of the Project relative to existing or proposed lines is shown in the ATSI Transmission Network Map, included as part of the confidential portion of the FirstEnergy Corp. 2020 Long-Term Forecast Report (LTFR). This map was submitted to the PUCO in Case No. 20-0657-EL-FOR under Rule 4901:5-5:04 (C)(2)(b) of the Ohio Administrative Code. The map is incorporated by reference only. This map shows ATSI’s 345 kV and 138 kV transmission lines and transmission substations including the Juniper-Newburgh, Juniper-Jennings, and Juniper-Pleasant Valley 138 kV Q-1 & Q-2 1 Transmission Lines. The Project Area is located approximately 9 /5 inches (11” x 17” 3 printed version) from the left edge of the map and 2 /5 inches (11” x 17” printed version) from the top of the map. The general location and layout of the Project Area is shown in Exhibits 1 through 3. The Project is not included in ATSI’s LTFR filed in 2020 as this is an environmental condition based emergent project. 4906-6-05 (B)(4): Alternatives Considered No other alternatives were considered. 4906-6-05 (B)(5): Public Information Program ATSI’s manager of External Affairs will advise local officials of features and the status of the proposed Transmission Line Project, as necessary. ATSI will maintain a copy of this Construction Notice application on FirstEnergy’s website. The affected property 3 American Transmission Systems, Incorporated Juniper-Newburgh / Juniper-Jennings & Juniper-Pleasant Valley Q1 & Q2 138kV Transmission Line Structure Replacement Project owner will be notified at least 7 days before construction begins informing them of the Project’s start and a proposed timeframe of construction and restoration activities. 4906-6-05 (B)(6): Construction Schedule The construction schedule for this Project is expected to begin as early as February 18, 2021 and is anticipated to be completed by October 31, 2021. 4906-6-05 (B)(7): Area Map Exhibit 1 depicts the general location of the Project on a partial copy of the United States Geological Survey USGS 7.5’ Quad ID Northfield. Exhibit 2 provides a partial copy of aerial imagery provided by ESRI. 4906-6-05 (B)(8): Property Owner List The Project is located and all work pertaining to the structure replacement will be within existing FirstEnergy right-of-way. Table 1 contains a list of property owners affected by the Project. Table 1: Property Owner List Parcel Property Owner Address Easement Status Number Cleveland Electric 573-17-007 Tinkers Creek Road N/A Illuminating Co The United States of Cuyahoga Valley National 573-17-009 Existing Easement America Park Canal Road 4 American Transmission Systems, Incorporated Juniper-Newburgh / Juniper-Jennings & Juniper-Pleasant Valley Q1 & Q2 138kV Transmission Line Structure Replacement Project 4906-6-05 (B)(9): TECHNICAL FEATURES OF THE PROJECT 4906-6-05 (B)(9)(a): Operating Characteristics The existing transmission lines have the following characteristics. The same conductors, static wire, and insulators will be installed on the new proposed structure. Voltage: 138 kV Conductors: 795 kcmil 36/1 ACSR Static Wire: 7#8 Alumoweld Insulators: Porcelain Structure Types: Exhibit 4: Double-Circuit Suspension Steel Monopole Single Shield Wire; One (1) structure needed. Exhibit 5: Double-Circuit Suspension Steel Monopole Double Shield Wire; One (1) structure needed. 4906-6-05 (B)(9)(b): Electric and Magnetic Fields The closest occupied residence or institution is approximately 200 feet north from the proposed transmission line centerline; therefore, no Electric and Magnetic Field (“EMF”) calculations are required by this rule. 4906-6-05 (B)(9)(c): Estimated Cost The estimated cost for the proposed project is approximately $1,155,115. 4906-6-05 (B)(10): SOCIAL AND ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS 4906-6-05 (B)(10)(a): Land Uses The Project is located in the Village of Valley View, Cuyahoga County, Ohio. The main land use around the Project is greenspace owned by the Cuyahoga Valley National Park and nearby residential development to the north and adjacent to Tinkers Creek Road. 5 American Transmission Systems, Incorporated Juniper-Newburgh / Juniper-Jennings & Juniper-Pleasant Valley Q1 & Q2 138kV Transmission Line Structure Replacement Project 4906-6-05 (B)(10)(b): Agricultural Land Agricultural land does not exist within the Project’s disturbance area. 4906-6-05 (B)(10)(c): Archaeological or Cultural Resources As part of the investigation, a search of Ohio Historic Preservation Office (“OHPO”) online database was conducted to identify the existence of any significant historic or cultural resource sites within a 0.5-mile area of potential effect (APE). The results of the search are shown in Exhibit 6. The specific locations of any archeological resources identified within the APE and surrounding areas are excluded from the map as their locations are considered proprietary. The OHPO database includes all Ohio listings on the National Register of Historic Places (“NRHP”), including districts, sites, building, structures, and objects that are significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering, and culture. The results of the search indicate that three (3) listed NRHP sites, and four (4) NRHP Districts were identified within 0.5 mile of the Project. The nearest
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ohio:And.Erie Canal- ■ HAER No
    Ohio:and.Erie Canal- ■ HAER No. OH-59 Links .Lake Erie at Cleveland Hfie-t with the Ohio River at Portsmouth Peninsula Vicinity Summit County Ohio 71- PE:N,V. PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA REDUCED COPIES OF MEASURED DRAWINGS Historic American Engineering Record National Park Service Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. 20013-7127 0^ 11- HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD OHIO AND ERIE CANAL: SELECTED STRUCTURES IN THE CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL RECREATION AREA HAER NO. OH-59 Location: Lock No. 39 - West side of Canal Road, 3400 feet north of Stone Road, Valley View Ohio UTM: 17.447740.4582065 Cleveland South Quadrangle Lock No. 38 - Hillside and Canal Roads, Valley View, Ohio UTM: 17.448740.4580065 Northfield Quadrangle Tinkers Creek Aqueduct - Canal Road and Tinkers Creek Valley View, Ohio UTM: 17.449060.4579210 Northfield Quadrangle Lock No. 37 - Canal and Fitzwater roads, Valley View, Ohio UTM: 17.450040.4578320 Northfield Quadrangle Lock No. 29 and Peninsula Aqueduct - at Cuyahoga River 600 feet north of State Route 303, Peninsula, Ohio UTM: 17.453860.4565640 Date of Construction: 1825-27; Reconstructed 1905-06 Present Owner: State of Ohio Department of Public Works 65 South Front Street Columbus, Ohio 43215 Present Use: None, except Tinkers Creek Aqueduct, which is still in use. Significance: The Ohio and Erie Canal, linking Lake Erie at Cleveland with the Ohio River at Portsmouth, Ohio, was completed in 1832. The 308-mile inland waterway laid the foundation for Ohio's agricultural, industrial, commercial, and political growth. That section of canal between Akron and Cleveland was the first to open in 1827 there, the rapid drop in elevation -- nearly 400 feet in 38 miles -- required the construction of 44 locks.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Electric Company
    Supplement No. 9 Electric Pa P.U.C. No. S-1 PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Electric Generation Supplier Coordination Tariff Company Office Location 2800 Pottsville Pike P. O. Box 16001 Reading, Pennsylvania 19612 Issued: April 18, 2017 Effective: April 19, 2017 Steven E. Strah, President NOTICE Supplement No. 9 makes changes to existing Rules and Regulations. Electric Pa P.U.C. No. S-1 (Supp. 9) Ninth Revised Page No. 2 Pennsylvania Electric Company Superseding Eighth Revised Page No. 2 LIST OF MODIFICATIONS Rules and Regulations Modified Section 5.3 to shorten the Customer switching period and, as a result, the notification period required to process a Customer’s enrollment with an EGS (See Second Revised Page Nos. 20-22). Issued: April 18, 2017 Effective: April 19, 2017 Electric Pa P.U.C. No. S-1(Supp. 5) First Revised Page No. 3 Pennsylvania Electric Company Superseding Original Page No. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Modifications ..................................................................................................................2 Table of Contents. ......................................................................................................................3 How to Use Loose-Leaf Tariff ...................................................................................................4 Definition of Terms and Explanation of Abbreviations. ...........................................................5 RULES AND REGULATIONS: 1. The Tariff....................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • MJB&A Slide Template
    Benchmarking Air Emissions Of the 100 Largest Electric Power Producers in the United States July 2015 Summary Presentation Full Report at: www.mjbradley.com Report Authors: Christopher Van Atten Amlan Saha Lauren Slawsky Clement Russell Contributors: Benchmarking Air Emissions of the 100 Largest Electric Power Producers in the United States Full Report at: www.mjbradley.com JULY 2015 2015 Benchmarking Report: Key Findings • In 2013, power plant SO2 and NOx emissions were 80 percent and 74 percent lower, respectively, than they were in 1990 when Congress passed major amendments to the Clean Air Act. • In 2013, power plant CO2 emissions were 14 percent higher than they were in 1990. However, in recent years, from 2008 through 2013, power plant CO2 emissions decreased by 12 percent. Some of the factors driving this trend include slow economic growth, energy efficiency improvements, and the displacement Download the full 2015 Benchmarking Air of coal generation by natural gas and renewable energy Emissions report and plant level data at: www.mjbradley.com resources. • Mercury emissions from power plants have decreased 50 percent since 2000, and will decline further as the first-ever federal limits on mercury and other hazardous air pollutants from coal-fired power plants go into effect in 2015. Benchmarking Air Emissions of the 100 Largest Electric Power Producers in the United States Full Report at: www.mjbradley.com 2 JULY 2015 2015 Benchmarking Report: Rankings by Generation Generation (million MWh; Top 20 Power Producers Shown) 0 50 100 150 200 250 Duke 243.4 Exelon 195.1 Southern 180.2 NextEra Energy 175.7 AEP 153.1 Tennessee Valley Authority 144.1 Entergy 129.4 Calpine 103.0 NRG 99.4 Coal FirstEnergy 96.5 Natural Gas Dominion 93.9 MidAmerican* 91.9 Oil PPL 88.6 Nuclear Energy Future Holdings 73.4 Hydro US Corps of Engineers 69.0 Other/Renewable Xcel 68.8 Dynegy 60.8 PSEG 54.4 DTE Energy 43.9 Ameren 43.8 *On April 30, 2014, MidAmerican Energy Holdings NOTE: Only the top 20 producers shown.
    [Show full text]
  • COMPLETE CUSTOMER INFORMATION FORM All Contact Information Is Provided
    COMPLETE CUSTOMER INFORMATION FORM All contact information is provided IBO information is provided and complete Under Contract? i. Please have the customer confirm if they are under contract and provide the contract terms and end date COMPLETE THE LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan and Virginia markets do not apply You must complete a separate LOA for each legal entity(s) you enroll Complete the Personal Information Section List the accounts for which a quote is requested Print Name Sign and Date PROVIDE INVOICE COPIES Please provide the most recent invoice for each account you will be requesting a quote for For Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan and Virginia only– Please provide either 12- months of usage or a legible usage graph for each account PLEASE BE SURE TO SEND COMPLETE PACKET WITH ALL REQUIRED FORMS TO: FAX: 866.452.0053 EMAIL: [email protected] CUSTOMER INFORMATION FORM OHIO THRESHOLD FOR LARGE/MEDIUM COMMERCIAL ACCOUNTS IS MORE THAN $17,000 IN ANNUAL COMMODITY SPEND. EMAIL: [email protected] IBO NAME: FAX: 866.452.0553 IBO #: ATTN: ACN/XOOM Energy Commercial Division EMAIL: DATE: # OF PAGES: PHONE: COMPANY NAME: CONTACT: PHONE: EMAIL: CURRENTLY BUYING ENERGY FROM: ADDITIONAL NOTES: Utility Supplier/Retailer IF RETAILER WHO ARE YOU UNDER CONTRACT? IF YES, WHAT IS THE EXPIRATION DATE? Yes No PLEASE MAKE SURE YOU INCLUDE ALL OF THE ITEMS BELOW WHEN SUBMITTING YOUR INFORMATION: CHECK THE UTILITY: Big Business Program Customer AEP Ohio Duke Energy (Electricity) Information Form Completed AES Ohio Duke Energy
    [Show full text]
  • Apples Abound
    APPLES ABOUND: FARMERS, ORCHARDS, AND THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPES OF AGRARIAN REFORM, 1820-1860 A Dissertation Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy John Henris May, 2009 APPLES ABOUND: FARMERS, ORCHARDS, AND THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPES OF AGRARIAN REFORM, 1820-1860 John Henris Dissertation Approved: Accepted: ____________________________ ____________________________ Advisor Department Chair Dr. Kevin Kern Dr. Michael M. Sheng ____________________________ ____________________________ Committee Member Dean of the College Dr. Lesley J. Gordon Dr. Chand Midha ____________________________ ____________________________ Committee Member Dean of the Graduate School Dr. Kim M. Gruenwald Dr. George R. Newkome ____________________________ ____________________________ Committee Member Date Dr. Elizabeth Mancke ____________________________ Committee Member Dr. Randy Mitchell ____________________________ Committee Member Dr. Gregory Wilson ii ABSTRACT This dissertation argues that apple cultivation was invariably intertwined with, and shaped by, the seemingly discordant threads of scientific agricultural specialization, emigration, urbanization, sectionalism, moral reform, and regional identity in New England and Ohio prior to the American Civil War. As the temperance cause gained momentum during the 1820s many farmers abandoned their cider trees and transitioned to the cultivation of grafted winter apples in New England. In turn agricultural writers used
    [Show full text]
  • The Ohio & Erie Canal: the Evolution of a Name, 1825-1996
    The Ohio & Erie Canal: The Evolution of a Name, 1825-1996 By Sam Tamburro Historian Cuyahoga Valley National Park 17 June 2002 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................3 Background .................................................................................................................................3 Personal Accounts of Residents of Northeast Ohio ......................................................................6 Newspaper Articles and Advertisements .....................................................................................9 Maps ......................................................................................................................................... 16 Art, Photography, and Postcards ................................................................................................ 21 Ohio and Erie Canal Historiography .......................................................................................... 26 2 Executive Summary For most transportation systems, there is an official name and a vernacular, common name for everyday use. For example, the official, incorporated name of Interstate 80 is the “James W. Shocknessy Ohio Turnpike;” however, in day-to-day parlance and other media, it is simply known as the “Ohio Turnpike” or “I-80.” There are numerous examples of common names for nineteenth-century railroads, such as the “Nickel Plate Road” for the New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio-Erie Canal Report May, 2013 I
    Ohio-Erie Canal Report i May, 2013 Executive Summary Aquatic Nuisance Species of Concern Species Common Name This assessment characterizes the likelihood that a viable Hypophthalmichthys aquatic pathway exists at the Ohio-Erie Canal at Long molitrix silver carp Lake location, and that it would allow transfer of aquatic Hypophthalmichthys nobilis bighead carp nuisance species (ANS) between the Great Lakes and Mylopharyngodon piceus black carp Mississippi Rivers Basins. This was accomplished by Channa argus northern snakehead evaluating the hydrologic and hydraulic characteristics of the site based on readily available information, Alosa chrysochloris skipjack herring and conducting a species-specific assessment of the abilities of potential ANS to arrive at the pathway ANS movement from the Great Lakes Basin into the and cross into the adjacent basin. A couple of the key Mississippi River Basin nearly impossible. features of the Ohio-Erie Canal pathway are the Long Lake Feeder Gates and Long Lake Flood Gates that are As a result of this high rating for the probability of an adjacent to the Ohio-Erie Canal in Portage Lakes. These aquatic pathway existing at Ohio-Erie Canal, the are the locations where water is either diverted from likelihood of ANS transfer at this location was evaluated. Long Lake (which sits in the Mississippi River Basin) A total of five ANS were identified for a more focused into the Tuscarawas River through the Flood Gates or evaluation based on the biological requirements and from Long Lake into the Ohio-Erie Canal through the capabilities of each species. These species are listed in Feeder Gates.
    [Show full text]
  • FORM 10-K (Mark One)
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission Registrant; State of Incorporation; I.R.S. Employer File Number Address; and Telephone Number Identification No. 333-21011 FIRSTENERGY CORP. 34-1843785 (An Ohio Corporation) 76 South Main Street Akron, OH 44308 Telephone (800)736-3402 000-53742 FIRSTENERGY SOLUTIONS CORP. 31-1560186 (An Ohio Corporation) c/o FirstEnergy Corp. 76 South Main Street Akron, OH 44308 Telephone (800)736-3402 1-2578 OHIO EDISON COMPANY 34-0437786 (An Ohio Corporation) c/o FirstEnergy Corp. 76 South Main Street Akron, OH 44308 Telephone (800)736-3402 1-2323 THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY 34-0150020 (An Ohio Corporation) c/o FirstEnergy Corp. 76 South Main Street Akron, OH 44308 Telephone (800)736-3402 1-3583 THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY 34-4375005 (An Ohio Corporation) c/o FirstEnergy Corp. 76 South Main Street Akron, OH 44308 Telephone (800)736-3402 1-3141 JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY 21-0485010 (A New Jersey Corporation) c/o FirstEnergy Corp. 76 South Main Street Akron, OH 44308 Telephone (800)736-3402 1-446 METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY 23-0870160 (A Pennsylvania Corporation) c/o FirstEnergy Corp. 76 South Main Street Akron, OH 44308 Telephone (800)736-3402 1-3522 PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY 25-0718085 (A Pennsylvania Corporation) c/o FirstEnergy Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Firstenergy's History of Bad Business Decisions
    FirstEnergy’s history of bad business decisions Risky beginning In 1997, Ohio Edison changed its name to FirstEnergy when it acquired Centerior Energy, becoming the 11th largest electric utility in the country, serving 2.2 million customers in northern Ohio and western Pennsylvania. Centerior had invested in three expensive nuclear power plants, just about the time that the Three Mile Island accident in 1979 drove up the cost for these plants. Centerior cancelled one of the nuclear plants in 1994, slashed its dividend, and took a $1 billion write-off. Despite such troubles, and the threat of additional problems at reactors, Ohio Edison bailed out Centerior with the 1997 merger. With this risky investment, FirstEnergy was born. Safety violations FirstEnergy has made repeated mistakes with its poor safety record, as evidenced by its frequent citations from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for safety violations. In 2002, FirstEnergy narrowly averted disaster at the Davis-Besse reactor. The NRC had set a 2001 deadline for a crucial safety inspection, but FirstEnergy pushed it back to 2002, when the plant was scheduled to close for refueling. The NRC found a coolant leak from the reactor core had caused a gaping hole in the reactor cover, eating away six inches of the 6½-inch thick steel plate. The NRC also found a host of defective welds. FirstEnergy had to shut the plant down for two years for repairs. Poor oversight High costs for nuclear maintenance and safety led FirstEnergy to cut costs in other areas, like its tree trimming budget. In 2003, FirstEnergy inadvertently turned out the lights on the eastern U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010: the Proxy Statement
    ® ℠ Morningstar Document Research FORM DEF 14A American Water Works Company, Inc. - AWK Filed: March 26, 2010 (period: May 07, 2010) Official notification to shareholders of matters to be brought to a vote (Proxy) Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 SCHEDULE 14A Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Filed by the Registrant ⌧ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant � Check the appropriate box: � Preliminary Proxy Statement � Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e) (2)) ⌧ Definitive Proxy Statement � Definitive Additional Materials � Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 AMERICAN WATER WORKS COMPANY, INC. (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): ⌧ No fee required. � Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: (5) Total fee paid: � Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. � Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously.
    [Show full text]
  • A Green Shrouded Miracle the Administrative History of Cuyahoga Valley National Recreation Area, Ohio
    A Green Shrouded Miracle: TOC Page 1 of 9 A Green Shrouded Miracle The Administrative History of Cuyahoga Valley National Recreation Area, Ohio Special History Study Chapter 1: A Brief History of the Cuyahoga Valley The Cuyahoga River Valley is biologically unique--a “botanical crossroads” situated in the transition zone between the Central Lowlands to the west and the Appalachian Plateau to the east. The valley serves as a natural dividing line between these eastern mountain and western prairie physiographic provinces. Statement for Management, 1977 The Cuyahoga River of northeast Ohio originates from two sources. The river’s east branch emanates from a spring near Montville while the west branch begins near Chardon, both in Geauga County, Ohio. The branches combine near Burton. The river proceeds south through the Allegheny Plateau to present-day Akron where it unites with the Little Cuyahoga River. It is at Akron that the aforementioned watershed plateau divides the land north and south: for while the Cuyahoga River turns to the north and empties into Lake Erie, the Tuscarawas River, five miles distant from Akron, flows south to the Ohio River, thence to the mighty Mississippi and the Gulf of Mexico. The valley between Akron and Cleveland through which the Cuyahoga River flows consists of Devonian and Mississippian shales and Mississippian and Pennsylvanian sandstones. When the glacier receded (13,000 B.C.), coarse debris, including sand, gravel and clay, remained in a half-mile-wide valley marked with unstable slopes from 200 to 400 feet high. Within this valley, the meandering Cuyahoga River, fed by Furnace Run, Yellow Creek, Dickerson Run, Chippewa Creek, Salt Run, Brandywine Creek, and Tinkers Creek tributaries, cut into the bedrock and varied from 35 to 85 feet wide and a depth of from a few inches to five feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Development, Land Use, and the System of Cities in Northwest Ohio During the Nineteenth Century
    CREATING CONNECTIONS: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, LAND USE, AND THE SYSTEM OF CITIES IN NORTHWEST OHIO DURING THE NINETEENTH CENTURY Matthew D. Bloom A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2009 Committee: Andrew M. Schocket, Advisor David Shoemaker Graduate Faculty Representative Edmund J. Danziger, Jr. Timothy F. Messer-Kruse © 2009 Matthew D. Bloom All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Andrew M. Schocket, Advisor Examining how economics, geography, and politics interacted in the expansion and economic changes within the United States, this dissertation investigated the symbiotic relationships and their qualities among the economic transformations of an urban area and its surrounding hinterland throughout the nineteenth century. Specifically, it investigated how the economic and population changes within Toledo, Ohio, molded the development of agricultural hinterlands and how the condition and settlement of the surrounding rural areas shaped the economic changes of Toledo. The quality of transportation connections among Toledo and other nascent towns, market interactions among residents, and the relationships between land quality and usage provided for symbiotic economic development of urban areas and rural hinterlands. The ability to use certain transportation infrastructures, the condition of land, and the availability of natural resources determined the type, quantity, and strength of market connections among people, which influenced the amount and forms of economic change for the area. Conclusions of this study were drawn from analyzing census records, newspaper advertisements and editorials, agricultural reports, and business records and literature. This research introduced a new paradigm of regional economic change named the “subregional model” which included a hub, local economic centers, small villages and farms, and links of various qualities.
    [Show full text]