DOCSLIB.ORG

STRINGS ATTACHED How Utilities Use Charitable Giving to Influence Politics and Increase Investor Profits

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
STRINGS ATTACHED How Utilities Use Charitable Giving to Influence Politics and Increase Investor Profits STRINGS ATTACHED How utilities use charitable giving to influence politics and increase investor profits December 2019 - Energy and Policy Institute Strings Attached How utilities use charitable giving to influence politics and increase investor profits December 2019 The Energy and Policy Institute is a watchdog organization working to expose attacks on renewable energy and counter misinformation by fossil fuel and utility interests. It does not receive funding from for-profit corporations or trade associations. Authors David Anderson Matt Kasper David Pomerantz Kelly Roache Alissa Jean Schafer Joe Smyth Daniel Tait Itai Vardi Energy and Policy Institute Strings Attached, December 2019 1 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................................ 4 II. SCOPE OF THIS REPORT ............................................................................................................................................................. 7 III. KEY FINDINGS: FOUR WAYS UTILITIES USE CHARITABLE GIVING TO INFLUENCE POLITICS ...................................... 7 1. GRANTEES WEIGH IN ON POLITICAL MATTERS IN SUPPORT OF UTILITIES........................................................................................................7 2. UTILITIES GIVE TO ORGANIZATIONS CONNECTED WITH OR FAVORED BY IMPORTANT POLICYMAKERS.........................................................8 3. UTILITIES USE PHILANTHROPY TO SUPPRESS RESISTANCE AND DISSENT .........................................................................................................9 4. UTILITIES USE CHARITIES TO EXTORT SUPPORT FROM LOW-INCOME COMMUNITIES AND COMMUNITIES OF COLOR.............................. 10 IV. LACK OF UTILITY TRANSPARENCY....................................................................................................................................... 12 V. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REGULATORS AND POLICYMAKERS ................................................................................... 12 VI. DATA SOURCES ....................................................................................................................................................................... 13 VII. REPORT ORGANIZED BY UTILITY ........................................................................................................................................ 14 AMEREN ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 BASIC FACTS: ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 EXAMPLES OF AMEREN USING CHARITABLE GIVING TO MANIPULATE POLICY: ................................................................................................ 15 AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER .................................................................................................................................................... 19 BASIC FACTS: ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 19 EXAMPLES OF AEP USING CHARITABLE GIVING TO MANIPULATE POLICY: ....................................................................................................... 20 ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE (APS) ............................................................................................................................................... 24 BASIC FACTS: ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 24 EXAMPLES OF APS USING CHARITABLE GIVING TO MANIPULATE POLICY: ....................................................................................................... 25 DOMINION ENERGY ..................................................................................................................................................................... 29 BASIC FACTS: ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 29 EXAMPLES OF DOMINION USING CHARITABLE GIVING TO MANIPULATE POLICY: ............................................................................................ 31 DTE ENERGY .................................................................................................................................................................................. 35 BASIC FACTS: ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 35 EXAMPLES OF DTE USING CHARITABLE GIVING TO MANIPULATE POLICY: ....................................................................................................... 36 DUKE ENERGY ............................................................................................................................................................................... 40 BASIC FACTS: ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 40 EXAMPLES OF DUKE USING CHARITABLE GIVING TO MANIPULATE POLICY: ..................................................................................................... 42 ENTERGY ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 46 BASIC FACTS: ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 46 EXAMPLES OF ENTERGY USING CHARITABLE GIVING TO MANIPULATE POLICY: ............................................................................................... 47 FIRSTENERGY ................................................................................................................................................................................. 49 BASIC FACTS: ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 49 EXAMPLES OF FIRSTENERGY USING CHARITABLE GIVING TO MANIPULATE POLICY: ........................................................................................ 50 Energy and Policy Institute Strings Attached, December 2019 2 NEXTERA ENERGY......................................................................................................................................................................... 55 BASIC FACTS: ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 55 EXAMPLES OF NEXTERA USING CHARITABLE GIVING TO MANIPULATE POLICY:............................................................................................... 56 SOUTHERN COMPANY ................................................................................................................................................................ 60 BASIC FACTS: ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 60 EXAMPLES OF SOUTHERN COMPANY USING CHARITABLE GIVING TO MANIPULATE POLICY: ......................................................................... 62 Energy and Policy Institute Strings Attached, December 2019 3 I. Introduction In the fall of 2017, a parade of paid actors, pretending to be concerned residents, lined up to offer public comments to the New Orleans City Council in support of a new gas-burning power plant that Entergy wanted to build there. But the paid actors weren’t the only people testifying on behalf of Entergy or its gas plant proposal. A host of others, including directors of dozens of locally respected non-profits, also testified on behalf of the company and its gas plant proposal. Howard Rodgers of the New Orleans Council on Aging said that “gas is an energy that we use that does not have any kind of additional effects.” Burning natural gas, a fossil fuel, contributes to climate change, leading to more extreme weather and storm surges that have inundated New Orleans. Last year, Rodgers posed for a photo while receiving a $300,000 novelty check from Charles Rice, the Entergy CEO, to administer the utility’s “Power to Care” program. At least nine of the organizations which testified at the New Orleans City Council’s hearing on the gas plant on Entergy’s behalf that day had received charitable donations from the Entergy Charitable Foundation. They were a part of the charitable giving operation that Entergy, like virtually all regulated electric and gas utilities,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Examination to Pathways Powering Car Using Clean Energy
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2020 An Examination to Pathways Powering Car Using Clean Energy Marina Miranda West Virginia University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Part of the Automotive Engineering Commons, Energy Systems Commons, and the Power and Energy Commons Recommended Citation Miranda, Marina, "An Examination to Pathways Powering Car Using Clean Energy" (2020). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 7713. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/7713 This Problem/Project Report is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Problem/Project Report in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Problem/Project Report has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An Examination to Pathways Powering Car Using Clean Energy Marina Miranda Project Report Submitted to the Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources West Virginia University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Energy Systems Engineering Hailin Li, Ph.D., Chair Roger Chen, Ph.D. Yi Luo, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 ESG Report
    2021 REPORT Environmental, Social and Governance Our strategy: NextEra About Our 2020-2021 Coronavirus Confronting Building the Environment Social Governance Risks and Conclusion Appendix A letter from Energy’s this report operating awards & (COVID-19) climate world’s leading opportunities our CEO ESG journey portfolio recognitions response change clean energy provider Contents Our strategy: A letter from our CEO .............................................3 NextEra Energy’s ESG journey ......................................................6 About this report .............................................................................7 Our operating portfolio ..................................................................8 2020-2021 awards & recognitions ..............................................10 Coronavirus (COVID-19) response..............................................11 Confronting climate change ........................................................13 Building the world’s leading clean energy provider .................19 Florida Power & Light Company ................................................20 NextEra Energy Resources ........................................................26 Environment ...................................................................................30 Social ..............................................................................................38 Governance ....................................................................................48 Risks and opportunities ...............................................................52
    [Show full text]
  • Case No. Pur-2020-00074
    200430141 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION AT RICHMOND, APRIL 29, 2020 Document Control Center 04/29/[email protected] PM COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, ex rel. STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION CASE NO. PUR-2020-00074 Ex Parte: Authority to create regulatory asset ORDER On April 21, 2020, the following public utilities filed a letter request ("Letter") with the Clerk of the State Corporation Commission ("Commission"): Washington Gas Light Company; Columbia Gas of Virginia, Inc.; Roanoke Gas Company; Virginia Natural Gas, Inc.; Atmos Energy Corporation; Appalachian Natural Gas Distribution Company; Southwestern Virginia Gas Company; Aqua Virginia, Inc.; and Virginia-American Water Company. The Letter seeks the Commission's approval "to create a [r]egulatory [a]ssetto record incremental prudently incurred costs and suspended late payment fees attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic."1 The Letter notes that the Commission has issued orders2 taking judicial notice of the ongoing public health emergency related to the spread of the coronavirus, or COVID-19, and the 1 Letter at 1. On April 27, 2020, Massanutten Public Service Corporation filed comments supporting the Letter and asking for the same relief. 2 See, e.g., Commonwealth of Virginia, ex rel. State Corporation Commission, Ex Parte: Electronic Service of Commission Orders, Case No. CLK-2020-00004, Doc. Con. Cen. No. 200330035, Order Concerning Electronic Service of Commission Orders (Mar. 19, 2020); Commonwealth of Virginia, ex rel. State Corporation Commission, Ex Parte: Revised Operating Procedures During COVID-19 Emergency, Case No. CLK-2020-00005, Doc. Con. Cen. No. 200330042, Order Regarding the State Corporation Commission's Revised Operating Procedures During COVID-19 Emergency (Mar.
    [Show full text]
  • Abigail Spanberger Has Been Endorsed by More Than 20 Liberal
    Abigail Spanberger has been endorsed by more than 20 liberal groups—including NARAL and End Citizens United—and by more than 30 individuals, including Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and Justin Fairfax: • Spanberger was endorsed by more than 20 liberal groups, including End Citizens United, the New Dems, Moms Demand Action, and NARAL. Organizational Endorsements 1Planet AAPI Victory Fund (Asian American Pacific Islanders) Blue Wave Crowdsource Coalition to Stop Gun Violence EMILY’s List End Citizens United Foreign Policy for America (Foreign Policy Action Network) Human Rights Campaign J Street League of Conservation Voters Moms Demand Action MoveOn.org NARAL Pro-Choice America National Committee for an Effective Congress National Council to Preserve Social Security and Medicare National Women’s Political Caucus New Dem PAC Off the Sidelines Planned Parenthood Action Fund Population Connection Action Fund Serve America Virginia AFL-CIO Virginia Education Association Virginia PBA (Virginia Police Benevolent Association) Women Under Forty Political Action Committee • Spanberger was endorsed by more than 30 individuals, including President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, Senators Tim Kaine and Mark Warner, and Virginia Lt. Governor Justin Fairfax. Individual Endorsements Honorable Dawn Adams–House of Delegates, District 68 Honorable Lamont Bagby–House of Delegates, District 74 Larry Barnett–2017 Candidate for the 27th District of the Virginia House of Delegates Eileen Bedell–2016 and 2018 Democratic Candidate for Virginia’s 7th Congressional District Joe Biden–47th Vice President of the United States Tony Burgess–7th District Democratic Committee and Nottway County Democratic Committee Co-Chair Sheila Bynum-Coleman–2017 Democratic Candidate for the 62nd District of the Virginia House of Delegates James Corden Harold “Bud” Cothern, EdD.–Former Superintendent of Goochland County Public Schools Melissa Dart–2017 Democratic Candidate for the 56th District of the Virginia House of Delegates Clarence M.
    [Show full text]
  • New Strategies for Utility Growth
    New Strategies for Utility Growth As electricity use levels off, utility executives will need to explore new ways to meet investor growth expectations. By Grant Dougans and Joe Scalise Grant Dougans is a partner in Bain’s Utilities practice, and Joe Scalise leads the practice globally. Joe also leads the fi rm’s Energy & Natural Resources practice in the Americas. Copyright © 2019 Bain & Company, Inc. All rights reserved. New Strategies for Utility Growth At a Glance Investors remain confident in the regulated utility model, and most expect earnings growth of at least 6% annually—a daunting challenge given that electricity load growth is nearly flat for many utilities. In the core regulated utility business, every function has a role to play in supporting growth at a time of increasing competitive pressure and heightened scrutiny from regulators and stakeholders. Winners will use M&A to access new capital investment opportunities, build scale and realize cost savings. Some executive teams will develop second engines of growth outside of the regulated utility, in adjacencies that make use of their engineering and infrastructure expertise. Several utilities are exploring investments in new energy technologies, though success is far from guaranteed. Investors expect utilities to grow the size of their businesses by 70% over the next decade in the face of flat electric load growth. That is the stark message from new research by Bain & Company and Rivel Research Group, surveying utilities investors in North America. Our survey confirms investors’ extraordinary faith in the traditional regulated utility model(see Figure 1). Nearly three quarters of investors have a positive outlook on the sector, and more than 80% believe that the vertically integrated utility model remains sustainable.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia-Voting-Record.Pdf
    2017 | Virginia YOUR LEGISLATORS’ VOTING RECORD ON VOTING RECORD SMALL BUSINESS ISSUES: 2017 EDITION Issues from the 2016 and 2017 General Assembly Sessions: Floor votes by your state legislators on key small business issues during the past two sessions of the Virginia General Assembly are listed inside. Although this Voting Record does not reflect all elements considered by a lawmaker when voting or represent a complete profile of a legislator, it can be a guide in evaluating your legislator’s attitude toward small business. Note that many issues that affect small business are addressed in committees and never make it to a floor vote in the House or Senate. Please thank those legislators who supported small business and continue to work with those whose scores have fallen short. 2016 Legislation 5. Status of Employees of Franchisees (HB 18) – Clarifies in Virginia law that a franchisee or any 1. Direct Primary Care (HB 685 & SB 627) – employee of the franchisee is not an employee of the Clarifies that direct primary care (DPC) agreements franchisor (parent company). A “Yes” vote supports are not insurance policies but medical services and the NFIB position. Passed Senate 27-12; passed provides a framework for patient and consumer pro- House 65-34. Vetoed by governor. tections. These clarifications are for employers who want to offer DPC agreements combined with health 6. Virginia Growth and Opportunity Board insurance as a choice for patients to access afford- and Fund (HB 834 & SB 449) – Establishes the able primary care. A “Yes” vote supports the NFIB Virginia Growth and Opportunity Board to administer position.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Electric Company
    Supplement No. 9 Electric Pa P.U.C. No. S-1 PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Electric Generation Supplier Coordination Tariff Company Office Location 2800 Pottsville Pike P. O. Box 16001 Reading, Pennsylvania 19612 Issued: April 18, 2017 Effective: April 19, 2017 Steven E. Strah, President NOTICE Supplement No. 9 makes changes to existing Rules and Regulations. Electric Pa P.U.C. No. S-1 (Supp. 9) Ninth Revised Page No. 2 Pennsylvania Electric Company Superseding Eighth Revised Page No. 2 LIST OF MODIFICATIONS Rules and Regulations Modified Section 5.3 to shorten the Customer switching period and, as a result, the notification period required to process a Customer’s enrollment with an EGS (See Second Revised Page Nos. 20-22). Issued: April 18, 2017 Effective: April 19, 2017 Electric Pa P.U.C. No. S-1(Supp. 5) First Revised Page No. 3 Pennsylvania Electric Company Superseding Original Page No. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Modifications ..................................................................................................................2 Table of Contents. ......................................................................................................................3 How to Use Loose-Leaf Tariff ...................................................................................................4 Definition of Terms and Explanation of Abbreviations. ...........................................................5 RULES AND REGULATIONS: 1. The Tariff....................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • MJB&A Slide Template
    Benchmarking Air Emissions Of the 100 Largest Electric Power Producers in the United States July 2015 Summary Presentation Full Report at: www.mjbradley.com Report Authors: Christopher Van Atten Amlan Saha Lauren Slawsky Clement Russell Contributors: Benchmarking Air Emissions of the 100 Largest Electric Power Producers in the United States Full Report at: www.mjbradley.com JULY 2015 2015 Benchmarking Report: Key Findings • In 2013, power plant SO2 and NOx emissions were 80 percent and 74 percent lower, respectively, than they were in 1990 when Congress passed major amendments to the Clean Air Act. • In 2013, power plant CO2 emissions were 14 percent higher than they were in 1990. However, in recent years, from 2008 through 2013, power plant CO2 emissions decreased by 12 percent. Some of the factors driving this trend include slow economic growth, energy efficiency improvements, and the displacement Download the full 2015 Benchmarking Air of coal generation by natural gas and renewable energy Emissions report and plant level data at: www.mjbradley.com resources. • Mercury emissions from power plants have decreased 50 percent since 2000, and will decline further as the first-ever federal limits on mercury and other hazardous air pollutants from coal-fired power plants go into effect in 2015. Benchmarking Air Emissions of the 100 Largest Electric Power Producers in the United States Full Report at: www.mjbradley.com 2 JULY 2015 2015 Benchmarking Report: Rankings by Generation Generation (million MWh; Top 20 Power Producers Shown) 0 50 100 150 200 250 Duke 243.4 Exelon 195.1 Southern 180.2 NextEra Energy 175.7 AEP 153.1 Tennessee Valley Authority 144.1 Entergy 129.4 Calpine 103.0 NRG 99.4 Coal FirstEnergy 96.5 Natural Gas Dominion 93.9 MidAmerican* 91.9 Oil PPL 88.6 Nuclear Energy Future Holdings 73.4 Hydro US Corps of Engineers 69.0 Other/Renewable Xcel 68.8 Dynegy 60.8 PSEG 54.4 DTE Energy 43.9 Ameren 43.8 *On April 30, 2014, MidAmerican Energy Holdings NOTE: Only the top 20 producers shown.
    [Show full text]
  • COMPLETE CUSTOMER INFORMATION FORM All Contact Information Is Provided
    COMPLETE CUSTOMER INFORMATION FORM All contact information is provided IBO information is provided and complete Under Contract? i. Please have the customer confirm if they are under contract and provide the contract terms and end date COMPLETE THE LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan and Virginia markets do not apply You must complete a separate LOA for each legal entity(s) you enroll Complete the Personal Information Section List the accounts for which a quote is requested Print Name Sign and Date PROVIDE INVOICE COPIES Please provide the most recent invoice for each account you will be requesting a quote for For Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan and Virginia only– Please provide either 12- months of usage or a legible usage graph for each account PLEASE BE SURE TO SEND COMPLETE PACKET WITH ALL REQUIRED FORMS TO: FAX: 866.452.0053 EMAIL: [email protected] CUSTOMER INFORMATION FORM OHIO THRESHOLD FOR LARGE/MEDIUM COMMERCIAL ACCOUNTS IS MORE THAN $17,000 IN ANNUAL COMMODITY SPEND. EMAIL: [email protected] IBO NAME: FAX: 866.452.0553 IBO #: ATTN: ACN/XOOM Energy Commercial Division EMAIL: DATE: # OF PAGES: PHONE: COMPANY NAME: CONTACT: PHONE: EMAIL: CURRENTLY BUYING ENERGY FROM: ADDITIONAL NOTES: Utility Supplier/Retailer IF RETAILER WHO ARE YOU UNDER CONTRACT? IF YES, WHAT IS THE EXPIRATION DATE? Yes No PLEASE MAKE SURE YOU INCLUDE ALL OF THE ITEMS BELOW WHEN SUBMITTING YOUR INFORMATION: CHECK THE UTILITY: Big Business Program Customer AEP Ohio Duke Energy (Electricity) Information Form Completed AES Ohio Duke Energy
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Retail Electric and Natural Gas Competition: Recent Developments and Policy Implications for Low Income Customers
    AN ANALYSIS OF RETAIL ELECTRIC AND NATURAL GAS COMPETITION: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS FOR LOW INCOME CUSTOMERS Barbara R. Alexander Consumer Affairs Consultant June 2013 Barbara R. Alexander opened her own consulting practice in March 1996. From 1986-1996 she was the Director, Consumer Assistance Division, at the Maine Public Utilities Commission. Her special area of expertise has been the exploration of and recommendations for consumer protection, universal service programs, service quality, and consumer education policies to accompany the move to electric, natural gas, and telephone competition. She has authored “A Blueprint for Consumer Protection Issues in Retail Electric Competition”(Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy, October, 1998). In addition, she has published reports that address policies associated with the provision of basic or “default” electric and natural gas service, smart meter pricing and consumer protection policies, consumer protection policies and programs that impact low income customers, and, in cooperation with Cynthia Mitchell and Gil Court, an analysis of renewable energy mandates in selected states. Her clients include national consumer organizations, state public utility commissions, and state public advocates. The author gratefully acknowledges the time and input from several colleagues on a draft of this report, specifically Janee Briesemeister of AARP, John Howat of National Consumer Law Center, Allen Cherry, an attorney with the Low Income Advocacy Project in Illinois, Aimee Gendusa-English with Citizens Utility Board in Illinois, and Pat Cicero of the Pennsylvania Utility Law Project. Of course, any errors or omissions are those of the author alone. Ms. Alexander can be reached at [email protected] This report was prepared under contract with Ingenium Professional Services, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 VPAP Annual Report
    Staying Nimble FINDING NEW WAYS TO ELEVATE PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING Top of the News 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Ballot ANNUAL REPORT 2020 Letter from the Board Chair On many levels, 2020 was both historic and humbling. A global pandemic and economic crisis. Social unrest and calls for racial justice. Political extremism and democracy under siege. Any one of these topics would be enough to contend with in a normal year, but at once 2020 brought many issues into plain sight. What we learned last year is that at a time of uncertainty and upheaval, the public’s hunger for reliable news and information grows exponentially. The STAFF challenge for the Virginia Public Access Project was to meet that demand, while adapting to remote work and rethinking nearly every aspect of our operation. David M. Poole Executive Director We enhanced VaNews to add “Top of the News” for those who value a quick summary of headlines. We developed a COVID-19 dashboard to make it easy Ric Arenstein to track coronavirus cases and deaths as reported by the Virginia Department Major Gifts Officer of Health. And we modified our traditional election night coverage to account for early voting and delayed returns. Rachel Dominy Graphic Design and I am proud of the many ways, large and small, the VPAP team seized Communications Manager opportunity and adapted during such a challenging year. You will find a few of those instances outlined in this annual report. Jason Kostyk Data Developer All of this success was made possible by the encouragement and support of our nearly 1,500 donors.
    [Show full text]
  • Dominion Energy, Inc.; Rule 14A-8 No-Action Letter
    SANFORD J. LEWIS, ATTORNEY February 10, 2020 VIA e-mail: [email protected] Office of Chief Counsel Division of Corporation Finance U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, N. E. Washington D.C. 20549 Via email: [email protected] Re: Dominion Energy, Inc.’s December 30th Request to Exclude Shareholder Proposal of As You Sow regarding natural gas infrastructure asset stranding risk analysis. Ladies and Gentlemen: The Stewart Taggart & Rebecca W Taggart JT REV TR UAD 08/29/17 (the “Proponent”) is beneficial owner of common stock of Dominion Energy, Inc.’s (the “Company”). As You Sow has submitted a shareholder proposal (the “Proposal”) on behalf of the Proponent to the Company. This letter hereby responds to the letter dated December 30th, 2019 ("Company Letter") sent to the Securities and Exchange Commission by Katherine K. DeLuca, McGuireWoods LLP. In that letter, the Company contends that the Proposal may be excluded from the Company’s 2020 proxy statement. Based upon a review of the Proposal, the letter sent by the Company, and the relevant rules, the Proposal is not excludable and must be included in the Company’s 2020 proxy materials under Rule 14a-8. A copy of this letter is being emailed concurrently to Katherine K. DeLuca, McGuireWoods LLP. SUMMARY The Proposal asks the Company to issue a report describing how it is responding to the risk of stranded assets of current and planned natural gas-based infrastructure and assets in the face of an intensifying global response to stabilizing climate change. The Company asserts that it has largely implemented the Proposal by addressing its underlying concerns and satisfying its essential objective.
    [Show full text]