DOCSLIB.ORG

SAL Annual Report 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SINGAPORE ACADEMY OF LAW ANNUAL REPORT 2009/10 ITBETTER MAKING OUR MISSION & VALUES CONTENTS p. 2 About Us Building up the intellectual capital, p. 6 The President’s Review p. 8 The Senate capability and infrastructure of p. 10 Facts, Figures & Highlights p. 14 Legal Knowledge: Through Continuing Education members of the Singapore Academy p. 20 Legal Industry: Through Active Engagement p. 28 Legal Technology: Through User Participation of Law and promoting ESPRIT DE p. 32 Corporate Services: Through Human Capital CORPS among the members of the p. 36 Key Executives p. 39 Financial Review Singapore Academy of Law. Singapore Academy of Law Annual Report 2009/10 MICA (P) 142/11/2010, ISSN 1793-5679 SAL AR 09/10 p. 1 ABOUT US THE SINGAPORE ACADEMY OF LAW (THE “ACADEMY”) MR WONG MENG MENG, SC AND THE DEAN OF THE FACULTY HAS CLOSE TO 8,000 MEMBERS COMPRISING ALL PERSONS WHO OF LAW OF THE NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE, ARE CALLED AS ADVOCATES AND SOLICITORS OF THE SUPREME PROFESSOR TAN CHENG HAN, SC. THE SENATE ALSO COURT OR WHO ARE APPOINTED AS LEGAL SERVICE OFFICERS. COMPRISES THE HIGH COURT JUDGES, THE DEAN OF THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE ACADEMY COMPRISES OF THE BENCH, THE SCHOOL OF LAW OF THE SINGAPORE MANAGEMENT THE BAR, AND LARGE NUMBERS OF CORPORATE COUNSEL AND UNIVERSITY, ACADEMIA AND THE PRACTISING PROFESSION. FACULTY MEMBERS OF THE LOCAL LAW SCHOOLS. THE WORK OF THE ACADEMY IS FOCUSED ON THREE KEY THE ACADEMY IS GOVERNED BY THE SENATE WHICH IS HEADED AREAS: SUPPORTING THE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF BY THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE CHAN SEK KEONG THE LEGAL INDUSTRY; BUILDING UP THE INTELLECTUAL AS PRESIDENT. IN THE PERIOD UNDER REVIEW, THE CAPITAL OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION BY ENHANCING LEGAL VICE-PRESIDENTS OF THE ACADEMY WERE THE HONOURABLE KNOWLEDGE; AND IMPROVING THE EFFICIENCY OF LEGAL ACTING ATTORNEY-GENERAL MRS KOH JUAT JONG, PRACTICE THROUGH LEGAL TECHNOLOGY. THE WORK OF THE THE HONOURABLE JUDGE OF APPEAL JUSTICE CHAO HICK TIN, ACADEMY IS DRIVEN BY THESE THREE CORE MANDATES. THIS THE HONOURABLE JUDGE OF APPEAL JUSTICE IN TURN IS DIRECTED TOWARDS RAISING THE STANDARD AND ANDREW PHANG BOON LEONG, THE HONOURABLE JUDGE QUALITY OF LEGAL PRACTICE AND BUILDING A STRONG AND OF APPEAL JUSTICE V K RAJAH, PRESIDENT OF THE LAW DYNAMIC LEGAL COMMUNITY IN SINGAPORE. SOCIETY OF SINGAPORE, SAL AR 09/10 p. 2 SAL AR 09/10 p. 3 GETTING RESULTS SAL AR 09/10 p. 4 SAL AR 09/10 p. 5 TO RESTRUCTURE AND IMPROVE The cluster also organised the inaugural lecture of the SAL Distinguished Speaker Series. The aim is to invite eminent jurists and prominent legal personalities to share their knowledge with members OUR CLE, THE SINGAPORE INSTITUTE of the legal fraternity in Singapore. The inaugural speaker for the series was The Honourable James OF LEGAL EDUCATION WAS Jacob Spigelman AC, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of New South Wales. INCORPORATED ON 18 JANUARY Legal Knowledge Cluster To serve the larger community, the legal practitioner needs to constantly upgrade his expertise to THIS YEAR AS A SUBSIDIARY OF THE remain current and relevant. The Academy has built up and made accessible a large corpus of SINGAPORE ACADEMY OF LAW. IT Singapore law through the Singapore Law Reports, LawNet and the many publications that it has produced. We have also provided continuing legal education (“CLE”) through seminars, workshops WILL OVERSEE AND CO-ORDINATE and lectures on both general and specialised areas of law practice. THE PRESIDENT’S REVIEW THE VARIOUS LEGAL EDUCATION At the Opening of the Legal Year 2010, Academy Publishing launched the landmark Singapore INITIATIVES AND PROGRAMMES Law Reports (Reissue) (“SLR(R)”), comprising 78 volumes of case law and 6 volumes of consolidated finding aids. WithSLR(R) , the Academy is able to offer the first complete and integrated set of IN SINGAPORE WHEN IT IS judgments from 1965 to 2009 in a special limited edition set and on LawNet at affordable prices. In addition, new titles on competition law and corporate governance were published. OPERATIONAL IN APRIL 2011. The Academy’s legal and public education programmes continue to be well attended. One of the highlights was the SAL Forensics Conference and exhibition which was attended by close to I am pleased to present the Singapore Academy 400 local and foreign delegates. The two-day conference featured presentations by 15 eminent of Law annual report for 2009/2010 which sets speakers including world-renowned forensic scientist, Dr Henry Lee. out our goals and strategies and analyses our performance and achievements in the past year. The Academy’s first public education seminar was similarly well-received. Over 400 students from 21 pre-university institutions attended the inaugural Junior College Law Programme which Legal Industry Cluster includes a two-day conference followed by a job-shadowing segment with law firms and other One of the core mandates of the Academy is to look at legal institutions. how the legal industry can be made more dynamic and relevant to the times. The Academy initiates To restructure and improve our CLE, the Singapore Institute of Legal Education was incorporated programmes to encourage companies and law on 18 January this year as a subsidiary of the Singapore Academy of Law. It will oversee and firms to choose Singapore as their partner for legal co-ordinate the various legal education initiatives and programmes in Singapore when it is solutions, use Singapore law as the governing law for operational in April 2011. international commercial contracts and Singapore as a venue for international dispute resolution. Legal Technology Cluster The Academy develops and promotes the use of the latest technology to facilitate easy, speedy Our website Singapore Law Watch (“SLW”), and efficient access to legal information and processes. For the past decade, LawNet has been which provides daily Singapore legal news, is Singapore’s leading legal research website and today, it is subscribed to by more than 90% of extremely popular with the legal community. Singapore lawyers. Page views of SLW has doubled to over 200,000 a month while total number of subscribers Over the past year, we have extended LawNet services to Malaysia, Australia and the UK. increased three-fold to over 4,500 subscribers. Outlook In the past year, the Singapore Mediation Centre Our mission is never ending. While much has been done, there are always new heights to scale continued to promote mediation both locally and and obstacles to overcome. Looking forward, I am confident we have the people and collective abroad. Two new mediation schemes were introduced sense of purpose to continue the Academy’s success. On behalf of the Academy, I wish to thank our to provide more cost-effective mechanisms for dispute members and staff for their contributions which have made possible the achievements in the past resolution. Firstly, family law practitioners were year. I look forward to your continuing hard work and support. encouraged to use mediation for family law cases under a scheme which offers discounted rates. Secondly, the Council for Private Education or CPE Mediation- Arbitration Scheme provides a structured and cost- Chief Justice Chan Sek Keong effective dispute resolution mechanism to cater to the President, Singapore Academy of Law needs of students and private education institutions. SAL AR 09/10 p. 6 SAL AR 09/10 p. 7 In the period under review, the Vice-Presidents of the Academy were the Honourable Acting Attorney-General Mrs Koh Juat Jong, the Honourable Judge of Appeal Justice Chao Hick Tin, the Honourable THE SENATE IS HEADED BY THE Judge of Appeal Justice Andrew Phang Boon Leong, the Honourable HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE Judge of Appeal Justice V K Rajah, President of the Law Society of Singapore, Mr Wong Meng Meng, SC and the Dean of the Faculty of Law THE SENATE CHAN SEK KEONG AS PRESIDENT. of the National University of Singapore, Professor Tan Cheng Han, SC. The Senate also comprises the High Court Judges, the Dean of the School of Law of the Singapore Management University, academia and the practising profession. seated from left to right standing from left to right seated from left to right standing from left to right not in picture Mr Wong Meng Meng, SC 1 Justice Tan Lee Meng Justice Chan Seng Onn Justice Quentin Loh Mr Michael Hwang 4 vice-president Justice Kan Ting Chiu Justice Andrew Ang Mr Giam Chin Toon, SC Mr Sundaresh Menon, SC 5 Judge of Appeal Justice Andrew Phang Boon Leong Justice Judith Prakash Justice Belinda Ang Saw Ean Mr Charles Lim Aeng Cheng Professor Michael Furmston vice-president Justice Lai Siu Chiu Justice Choo Han Teck Mr Leo Cheng Suan Mr Lucien Wong Acting Attorney-General Mrs Koh Juat Jong 2 Mr Joseph Grimberg, SC 3 Justice Woo Bih Li Justice Philip Pillai Professor Yeo Tiong Min vice-president Justice Lee Seiu Kin Justice Steven Chong Chief Justice Chan Sek Keong Professor Hans Tjio 4 served as Vice-President up to president 1 appointed as Vice-President Justice Tay Yong Kwang 31 July 2010 Judge of Appeal Justice Chao Hick Tin from 18 August 2010 5 appointed as Vice-President from 2 served as Vice-President 1 October 2010 vice-president up to 30 September 2010 Judge of Appeal Justice V K Rajah 3 served as Senate member vice-president up to 22 August 2010 Professor Tan Cheng Han, SC vice-president SAL AR 09/10 p. 8 SAL AR 09/10 p. 9 AUTHENTICATION CERTIFICATES NEW PUBLICATIONS ISSUED NEW SENIOR COUNSEL FACTS, FIGURES & HIGHLIGHTS APPOINTMENTS 169 4,500 EVENTS ATTENDED SLW SUBSCRIBERS BY 7,545 PEOPLE LEGAL MATERIALS & CASES UPLOADED
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2010 - 2011 Contents

    Annual Report 2010 - 2011 Contents

    Annual Report 2010 - 2011 Contents 2 Foreword by the Attorney-General 6 Remembrance and Congratulations 10 Our Mission, Vision and Core Values 13 Our Roles 15 Our Corporate Structure A. AGC’s Management Team B. Six Legal Divisions and Two Non-Legal Divisions 29 Our Key Milestones A. As The Government’s Chief Legal Adviser and Counsel i. AGC’s Advisory Work ii. AGC’s Involvement in Litigation iii. AGC in Negotiations iv. AGC as Legislative Draftsman B. As Public Prosecutor C. In Performing Other Assigned Duties of a Legal Character D. Our Corporate Resources 61 Our Training, Development and Outreach 67 The Ties that Bind Us 71 Key Figures for 2010-2011 A. Corporate Awards B. Performance Indicators C. Financial Indicators for FY2010-FY2011 Attorney-General’s Chambers ANNUAL REPORT 2010 - 2011 1 FOREWORD BY THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL As we look back on these past years, the taxation policies and policies concerning adjust to these changes so that we can function perceptible increase in the complexity of our casino regulation. Cross-Divisional teams effectively. work is particularly striking. This growing were also engaged to deal with cases before complexity has in turn given rise to two the Singapore Courts when we were required With this in mind, I have intensified the consequences, which I elaborate on below. to address constitutional challenges and also commitment of my Chambers to the training, to defend Singapore’s judiciary in the face of development and specialisation of our officers contempt. so that we are well placed to support the THE NEED FOR Government with the highest level of legal iNTER-dIVISIONAL This is perhaps a reality that is ultimately to be services.
  • This Paper Has Been Published in the Journal of Business Law and The

    This Paper Has Been Published in the Journal of Business Law and The

    Supreme Court of Singapore, 1 Supreme Court Lane, Singapore 178879, t: (65)-6332-1020 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ This paper has been published in the Journal of Business Law and the Supreme Court Library Queensland gratefully acknowledges the permission of the editor, Professor Robert Merkin, to reprint it in the Yearbook. A version of this essay was delivered at the Current Legal Issues Seminar in the Banco Court on 12 September 2013. I would like to express my deepest appreciation to Ms Andrea Gan and Mr Jonathan Yap, Justices’ Law Clerks, Supreme Court of Singapore, as well as to Asst Prof Goh Yihan of the Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore, for their helpful comments and suggestions. I would also like to dedicate this essay to all the participants who displayed an extraordinary (and, I might add, rare) degree of enthusiasm and (above all) friendship. All errors remain mine alone. Further, all views expressed in this essay are personal views only and do not reflect the views of the Supreme Court of Singapore. Andrew Phang Our Vision: Excellence in judicial education and research. Our Mission: To provide and inspire continuing judicial learning and research to enhance the competency and professionalism of judges. The Challenge of Principled Gap-Filling — A Study of Implied Terms in a Comparative Context by The Honourable Justice Andrew Phang Boon Leong* There has been a veritable wealth of literature on implied terms — ranging from doctoral theses1 to book chapters,2 articles3 and (more recently) a book.4 What accounts for this interest? Perhaps the simplest explanation is that it is an extremely important topic with at least two important functions — one substantive, the other theoretical.
  • Minlaw) Invited Applications for the Second Round of Qualifying Foreign Law Practice (QFLP) Licences on 1 July 2012

    Minlaw) Invited Applications for the Second Round of Qualifying Foreign Law Practice (QFLP) Licences on 1 July 2012

    PRESS RELEASE AWARD OF THE SECOND ROUND OF QUALIFYING FOREIGN LAW PRACTICE LICENCES The Ministry of Law (MinLaw) invited applications for the second round of Qualifying Foreign Law Practice (QFLP) licences on 1 July 2012. Twenty-three applications were received by the closing date of 31 August 2012. 2 QFLP licences will be awarded to the following four firms (listed in alphabetical order): Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher; Jones Day; Linklaters, and Sidley Austin. 3 The firms will have up to six months from 1 April 2013 to commence their operations as QFLPs, and their licences will be valid for an initial period of five years from the respective start dates. Background 4 The QFLP scheme was introduced in 2008 following the recommendations of the Committee to Develop the Legal Sector chaired by Justice V K Rajah. The Committee, which included senior lawyers from top local firms, assessed that local firms and local lawyers would benefit from the increased foreign presence and competition over time. 5 The QFLP licences allow Foreign Law Practices (FLPs) to practise in permitted areas of Singapore law1. The scheme seeks to support the growth of key economic sectors, grow the legal sector, as well as to offer additional 1 Permitted areas are all areas except domestic areas of litigation and general practice, for example, criminal law, retail conveyancing, family law and administrative law. The QFLPs can practise the permitted areas through Singapore-qualified lawyers with practising certificates or foreign lawyers holding the foreign practitioner certificate. 1 opportunities for our lawyers. A total of six FLPs2 were awarded QFLP licences in the first round in 2008.
  • The Development of Singapore Law: a Bicentennial Retrospective1

    The Development of Singapore Law: a Bicentennial Retrospective1

    (2020) 32 SAcLJ 804 (Published on e-First 8 May 2020) THE DEVELOPMENT OF SINGAPORE LAW: A BICENTENNIAL RETROSPECTIVE1 The present article reviews (in broad brushstrokes) the status of Singapore law during its bicentennial year. It is not only about origins but also about growth – in particular, the autochthonous or indigenous growth of the Singapore legal system (particularly since the independence of Singapore as a nation state on 9 August 1965). The analysis of this growth is divided into quantitative as well as qualitative parts. In particular, the former constitutes an empirical analysis which attempts – for the very first time − to tell the development of Singapore law through numbers, building on emerging techniques in data visualisation and empirical legal studies. Andrew PHANG Judge of Appeal, Supreme Court of Singapore. GOH Yihan Professor of Law, School of Law, Singapore Management University. Jerrold SOH Assistant Professor of Law, School of Law, Singapore Management University; Co-Founder, Lex Quanta. I. Introduction 1 The present article, which reviews (in broad brushstrokes) the status of Singapore law during its bicentennial year since the founding of Singapore by Sir Stamford Raffles in 1819, is of particular significance as English law constitutes the foundation of Singapore law. The role of Raffles and his successors, therefore, could not have been more directly 1 All views expressed in the present article are personal views only and do not reflect in any way the views of the Supreme Court of Singapore, the Singapore Management University or Lex Quanta. Although this article ought, ideally, to have been published last year, the immense amount of case law that had to be analysed has led to a slight delay.
  • Contract Law Chee Ho THAM Singapore Management University, Chtham@Smu.Edu.Sg

    Contract Law Chee Ho THAM Singapore Management University, [email protected]

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Research Collection School Of Law School of Law 2007 Contract law Chee Ho THAM Singapore Management University, [email protected] Pearlie KOH Singapore Management University, [email protected] Pey Woan LEE Singapore Management University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research Part of the Asian Studies Commons, and the Contracts Commons Citation THAM, Chee Ho; KOH, Pearlie; and LEE, Pey Woan. Contract law. (2007). Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review of Singapore Cases. 8, 150-195. Research Collection School Of Law. Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/347 This Journal Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Collection School Of Law by an authorized administrator of Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University. For more information, please email [email protected]. 150 SAL Annual Review (2007) 8 SAL Ann Rev 10. CONTRACT LAW Pearlie KOH LLB (Hons) (National University of Singapore), LLM (University of Melbourne); Advocate and Solicitor (Singapore); Associate Professor, Singapore Management University, School of Law. THAM Chee Ho LLB (Hons) (National University of Singapore), BCL (Oxford); Solicitor (England and Wales), Advocate and Solicitor (Singapore), Attorney and Counsellor-at-Law (New York State); Associate Professor, Singapore Management University, School of Law.
  • SOL LLM Brochure 2021 Copy

    SOL LLM Brochure 2021 Copy

    SMU – Right in the Heart of Asia’s Hub, Singapore Masters of Laws In the dynamic, cosmopolitan hub that is Singapore, you will find a vibrant city-state that pulses with the diversity of both East and West. LL.M. in Judicial Studies Situated at the cross-roads of the world, Singapore is home to multinational companies and thousands of small and medium-sized LL.M. in Cross-border Business and Finance Law in Asia enterprises flourishing in a smart city renowned for its business excellence and connectivity. With its strong infrastructure, political Dual LL.M. in Commercial Law (Singapore & London) stability and respect for intellectual property rights, this City in a Garden offers you unique opportunities to develop as a global citizen. Thorough. Transnational. Transformative. Tapping into the energy of the city is a university with a difference — the Singapore Management University. Our six schools: the School of Accountancy, Lee Kong Chian School of Business, School of Computing and Information Systems, School of Economics, Yong Pung How School of Law, and School of Social Sciences form the country’s only city campus, perfectly sited to foster strategic links with businesses and the community. Modelled after the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, SMU generates leading-edge research with global impact and produces broad-based, creative and entrepreneurial leaders for a knowledge-based economy. Discover a multi-faceted lifestyle right here at SMU, in the heart of Singapore. The SMU Masters Advantage GLOBAL RECOGNITION SMU is globally recognised as one of the best specialised universities in Asia and the world.
  • SCL (Singapore) Annual Construction Law Conference 2021 HOPE and FEARS - the Built Environment in the Next Decade Thursday, 23 September 2021 • 9.00 A.M

    SCL (Singapore) Annual Construction Law Conference 2021 HOPE and FEARS - the Built Environment in the Next Decade Thursday, 23 September 2021 • 9.00 A.M

    SCL (Singapore) Annual Construction Law Conference 2021 HOPE AND FEARS - the Built Environment in the Next Decade Thursday, 23 September 2021 • 9.00 a.m. to 5.30 p.m. Hybrid Conference Option of Attending In-Person (Limited Places & Subject to Government Approvals) or Via Zoom Webinar GUEST OF HONOUR & REGISTER HERE KEYNOTE SPEAKER OR SCAN QR CODE Ms Indranee THURAI RAJAH Minister, the Prime Minister’s Office; ABOUT THIS CONFERENCE Second Minister for Finance and National Development; Member of Parliament for Tanjong Hopes and fears – the built environment in the next decade Pagar GRC Business sectors including the built environment have had to and will continue to remould themselves in the shifting sands of the COVID-19 pandemic – there is no certainty that the old normal will ever return. Ms Indranee Rajah is the Minister in the Prime Minister’s This year’s SCL (Singapore) Annual Conference kicks off with Office. She is also Second Minister for Finance, and Second a discussion on transformative technologies and sustainable Minister for National Development. Ms Rajah has been the solutions during project execution before what is hopefully Member of Parliament for the Tanjong Pagar Group an invigorating yet light-hearted debate takes place on Representation Constituency (GRC) since 2001. She was in whether the next decade will bring forth a more collaborative practice as a lawyer and Senior Counsel before joining the working style in the built environment or will a culture of Government. Under her law portfolio from 2012 - 2018, she blame be the prevailing approach. After lunch, various co-chaired the Committees on Family Justice, the formation stakeholders provide their intriguing insights into what could of the Singapore International Commercial Court as well as perhaps be seen as a generational change in the conduct of the Committee to Strengthen Singapore as an International virtual dispute resolution hearings in a post-COVID-19 world.
  • Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon

    Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon

    RESPONSE BY CHIEF JUSTICE SUNDARESH MENON OPENING OF THE LEGAL YEAR 2018 Monday, 8 January 2018 Mr Attorney, Mr Vijayendran, Members of the Bar, Honoured Guests, Ladies and Gentlemen: I. Introduction 1. It is my pleasure, on behalf of the Judiciary, to welcome you all to the Opening of this Legal Year. I particularly wish to thank the Honourable Chief Justice Prof Dr M Hatta Ali and Justice Takdir Rahmadi of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, the Right Honourable Tun Md Raus Sharif, Chief Justice of Malaysia, and our other guests from abroad, who have made the effort to travel here to be with us this morning. II. Felicitations 2. 2017 was a year when we consolidated the ongoing development of the Supreme Court Bench, and I shall begin my response with a brief recap of the major changes, most of which have been alluded to. 1 A. Court of Appeal 3. Justice Steven Chong was appointed as a Judge of Appeal on 1 April 2017. This was in anticipation of Justice Chao Hick Tin’s retirement on 27 September 2017, after five illustrious decades in the public service. In the same context, Justice Andrew Phang was appointed Vice-President of the Court of Appeal. While we will feel the void left by Justice Chao’s retirement, I am heartened that we have in place a strong team of judges to lead us forward; and delighted that Justice Chao will continue contributing to the work of the Supreme Court, following his appointment, a few days ago, as a Senior Judge.
  • OPENING of the LEGAL YEAR 2021 Speech by Attorney-General

    OPENING of the LEGAL YEAR 2021 Speech by Attorney-General

    OPENING OF THE LEGAL YEAR 2021 Speech by Attorney-General, Mr Lucien Wong, S.C. 11 January 2021 May it please Your Honours, Chief Justice, Justices of the Court of Appeal, Judges of the Appellate Division, Judges and Judicial Commissioners, Introduction 1. The past year has been an extremely trying one for the country, and no less for my Chambers. It has been a real test of our fortitude, our commitment to defend and advance Singapore’s interests, and our ability to adapt to unforeseen difficulties brought about by the COVID-19 virus. I am very proud of the good work my Chambers has done over the past year, which I will share with you in the course of my speech. I also acknowledge that the past year has shown that we have some room to grow and improve. I will outline the measures we have undertaken as an institution to address issues which we faced and ensure that we meet the highest standards of excellence, fairness and integrity in the years to come. 2. My speech this morning is in three parts. First, I will talk about the critical legal support which we provided to the Government throughout the COVID-19 crisis. Second, I will discuss some initiatives we have embarked on to future-proof the organisation and to deal with the challenges which we faced this past year, including digitalisation and workforce changes. Finally, I will share my reflections about the role we play in the criminal justice system and what I consider to be our grave and solemn duty as prosecutors.
  • 4 Comparative Law and Constitutional Interpretation in Singapore: Insights from Constitutional Theory 114 ARUN K THIRUVENGADAM

    4 Comparative Law and Constitutional Interpretation in Singapore: Insights from Constitutional Theory 114 ARUN K THIRUVENGADAM

    Evolution of a Revolution Between 1965 and 2005, changes to Singapore’s Constitution were so tremendous as to amount to a revolution. These developments are comprehensively discussed and critically examined for the first time in this edited volume. With its momentous secession from the Federation of Malaysia in 1965, Singapore had the perfect opportunity to craft a popularly-endorsed constitution. Instead, it retained the 1958 State Constitution and augmented it with provisions from the Malaysian Federal Constitution. The decision in favour of stability and gradual change belied the revolutionary changes to Singapore’s Constitution over the next 40 years, transforming its erstwhile Westminster-style constitution into something quite unique. The Government’s overriding concern with ensuring stability, public order, Asian values and communitarian politics, are not without their setbacks or critics. This collection strives to enrich our understanding of the historical antecedents of the current Constitution and offers a timely retrospective assessment of how history, politics and economics have shaped the Constitution. It is the first collaborative effort by a group of Singapore constitutional law scholars and will be of interest to students and academics from a range of disciplines, including comparative constitutional law, political science, government and Asian studies. Dr Li-ann Thio is Professor of Law at the National University of Singapore where she teaches public international law, constitutional law and human rights law. She is a Nominated Member of Parliament (11th Session). Dr Kevin YL Tan is Director of Equilibrium Consulting Pte Ltd and Adjunct Professor at the Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore where he teaches public law and media law.
  • JUDICIARY TIMES - Issue 01

    JUDICIARY TIMES - Issue 01

    JUDICIARY TIMES - ISSUE 01 ISSUE 01 | MAY 2018 JUDICIARY TIMES Opening of Twelve Key Initiatives The Family Justice Legal Year 2018: Announced at Courts Workplan 2018: Towards a Future- State Courts In the Next Phase Ready Legal Sector Workplan 2018 1 JUDICIARY TIMES - ISSUE 01 CONTENTS ISSUE 01 | MAY 2018 01 03 04 OPENING OF JUDGES AND TWELVE KEY LEGAL YEAR 2018: INTERNATIONAL InitiatiVES Towards A JUDGES ATTEND ANNOUNCED at FUTURE-Ready SICC 2018 State Courts LEGAL Sector WORKPLAN 2018 05 06 07 International THE Family Court AND TRIBUNAL IT DEVELOPMENTS JUSTICE Courts Administrators AND ITS IMPACT WORKPLAN 2018: attend THE ON LAW IN THE NEXT PHASE EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP ProGRAMME 2 JUDICIARY TIMES - ISSUE 01 07 08 08 SMU SCHOOL Volunteer TRAINING FOR OF LAW HOSTS Mediators newly recruited LUNCH FOR attend TRAINING Volunteer SUPREME COURT ProGRAMME Support PERSONS BENCH 09 09 10 State Courts State Courts THE JUDICIARY introduces launcH GIVES Back to DOCUMENTS-Only PHASE 2 SOCIETY process FOR OF THE CJTS CIVIL CASES 11-13 14 15 15 16 NotaBLE WHAT’S AWARDS & UPCOMING BEHIND THE VISITS NEW ACCOLADES EVENTS SCENES 3 JUDICIARY TIMES - ISSUE 01 HIGHLIGHTS OPENING OF LEGAL YEAR 2018: Towards A FUTURE - Ready LEGAL Sector The Opening of the Legal Year on 8 January was Chief Justice also highlighted the challenges ahead for marked by the traditional ceremony that took place the legal fraternity and the courts, which included in the morning at the Supreme Court Auditorium, the potential disruptive force of technology and the followed by the Judiciary Dinner held at the Istana.
  • Paginator.Book([2006] 2 SLR(R) 0690.Fm)

    Paginator.Book([2006] 2 SLR(R) 0690.Fm)

    paginator.book Page 690 Monday, November 23, 2009 3:54 PM 690 SINGAPORE LAW REPORTS (REISSUE) [2006] 2 SLR(R) The Polo/Lauren Co, LP v Shop In Department Store Pte Ltd [2006] SGCA 14 Court of Appeal — Civil Appeal No 67 of 2005 Yong Pung How CJ, Chao Hick Tin JA and Tan Lee Meng J 21 February; 31 March; 6 April 2006 Trade Marks and Trade Names — Infringement — Appellant alleging respondent’s sign infringing appellant’s registered word mark — Applicable test for infringement under s 27(2)(b) Trade Marks Act — Whether respondent’s sign similar to appellant’s word mark — Whether goods to which defendant’s sign and plaintiff's mark applying similar — Whether likelihood of confusion on the part of the public existing — Section 27(2)(b) Trade Marks Act (Cap 332, 1999 Rev Ed) Facts The appellant was the registered proprietor of six trade marks including the “POLO” word mark (“the word mark”). The respondent operated five suburban stores that sold items such as clothing, bags, handbags, shoes, watches and household stuff at prices affordable to the masses. The respondent had applied to the Registry of Trade Marks to have the sign “POLO PACIFIC” (“the sign”) in the same class as the word mark. This application was accepted by the Registry for publication, although it was pending opposition by the appellant. In the meantime, the respondent had started to sell goods bearing the sign. The appellant considered this to be a breach of its rights under the word mark and commenced suit, alleging that the respondent had breached s 27(2) of the Trade Marks Act (Cap 332, 1999 Rev Ed) as well as a prior undertaking not to infringe the appellant’s marks.