CENSUS OF INDIA 1991
SERIES---'15
MANIPUR
PAPER-1 of 1991 SUPPLEMENT PROVISIONAL POPULATION TOTALS
A.R. KHAN of the Indian Administrative Service. Director of Census Operations, Manipur
CONTENTS
Figure< at a glance Messages Prefac~ ProviSional Population Table-l India Proviswni\l Po~ulation Table-2 India Introducti<>n A BRIEP ANALYStS Supplement Table I : POPULATION AND LITERATES BY RESIDENCE AND SEX 1991 Supplement Table 2 : PERCENTAGE OF URBAN POPULATION TO TOTAL POPULATION AND DECENNIAL GROWTH RATE AND SEX RATIO BY RESIDENCE Supplement -Table 3 : POPULATION OF TOWNS Supplement Table 3 : POPULATION OF TOWNS- APPENDIX Supplement Table 4 : GROWTH OF URBAN POPULATION Supplement Table 5 : TOTAL WORKERS. MAIN WORKERS, MARGINAL WORKERS AND THEIR PERCENTAGE TO TOTAL POPULATION Supplement Table 6 : DISTRIBUTION OF MAIN \."ORKERS AS CULTIVATORS. AGRICULTURAL LABOURERS, WORKERS IN HOUSEHOLD INDUSTRY AND OTHER WORKERS Maps : 1. Manipur --Administrative Divisions 2. Manipur -R' 'ral alld Urban Composition of Population 3. Manipur -Towns by class and size 4. Manipur -Distribution of main working population by Cultivators,. Agricultural Labourers, Household Industry and Other WorD.... CbarI!o : 1. Population by sex 1901-1991 2. Sex Ratio 1901-1991 3. Literacy 1981-91 4. Literacy Rate 1991 (Disttictwise) 5. Main Workers and Marginal Workers 1991 6. Workers by Main Works and Sex 1981-91 8cWut.. for the 1991 Census : I. Houselist ::I. Household Scbcdule 3. Individual Slip ~: I. List of Principal Cemus Officen 2. List of District Census Officen 3. List of Sub-Divisional Census Ofticcn/Census 0lIicen of LoGal Bod,.
(v)
CENSUS OF INDIA 1991 Promional Population Totals FIGURES AT A GLANCE
POPULATlbN Total 1,826,714 Mal", 931,511 Femal.. 895,203 DECENNIAL POPULATION GROWTH 1981-91 Absolute 405,761 Percentage 28.56 DENSITY OF POPULATION 82 pet sq. km. SEX RATIO 961 femal .. per 1,000 males LITERACY RATE • Tota! 60.96 per cent Male, 72.98 per cent Females 48.64 per cent URBAN POPULATION Total 505.848 Male, 256.729 Females 249,119 NUMBBR OF TOWNS 31 PERCE'NTAGE OF URBAN POPULATION '1:0 TOTAL POPULATION 27.69 per cent PERCENTAGE OF MAIN WORKERS TO TOTAL POPULATION 37.36 per cent
Category of Workers Percentage to total main worker!
Total Males Females (I) CULTIVATORS 57.10 36.19 58.40 (2) AGRICULTURAL LABOURERS 9.28 6.73 12.89 (3) HOUSEHOW INDUSTRY WORKERS 7.09 2.92 12.98 (4) OTHER WORKERS 26.53 34.16 15.7)
• LiterajeS exclude children in the a&e-IfOUP 1).6 who are tcealed III illiterates in the 1991 Cenaua.
MESSAGES
(ill
Message from His Excellency Shr; Chi.lamQlli Panigrahi. the Governor 0' MlI1IipIII, jn connection with 1991 Censw. I am happy to learn that the preparations for the nert Census of 1991 arein full swfna. The 1991 Census has a special significance because this will be thel.,t Census of this century. The variO\ls demographic data presented by the Census of 1991 will be the hasis of our planning for tho 4evelopment of Manipur for the next ten years till we face the li",t Census of the next century.
The Censu.of India is one of the largest administrative exercises of the world and it has been the tradition to gel the Census done largely through the officials of the State Government. " in the previous Censuses, the present Census of 1991 will also depend on hundreds of State Govem· ment dfficials who will be ongaged as either Enumerators or Supervisors for the conduct of the -censu; for a very limited duration of about three weeks from 9th February to 5th March, 1991. The Census work, though for a .hort duration. will be treated as part of their normal duties and their excellent performance in' population wumeration will be given due recognition. Thus the success of population enumeration depends on' the honest and truthful performance of the Enumerators and Super_iso", on the one hand and on the other on full cc' operation of the peoplo by giving accurate information about each and every person honestly and fearlessly.
The Deputy Commission... , Sub-Divisional,offic ... and other officers who are working as Census Officers at different levels are expected to do a clooe watch over the performance of the Enumerators. and Supervisors so that every person in Manipur, irrespective of his or her caste, creed, nationality or place of origin, is enumerated once and not more than once. I hope that the local newspapers and the AIR will also give maximum publicity to the forthcoming Census of 1991.
I would Iike-ta-appeal to all the citizens of Manipur to make the Census of 1991 a big succest.
1ai Hind
(xi)
MESSAGE FROM SHRI R. K. RANBIR SINGH. HON'BLE CHIEF MINISTER, MANIPUR, IN CONNECTION WITH 1991 CENSUS
~fir~j ,,~ ~!\ ;;, 'ill' ~tS ~1\ It 'l'1'e, 'Ill'll "!rr.1 "!'>!11~ (or~~ ~~ ,,((t' 1, llw'(l~~1 ~~. '" ~'J1 9f('(!'!11 9j"'itii~Ofi 11,1>; -rt;WI'Im'!JIl w,t"lil1 'II1I"Ilf1 ~~ ~~ I (xiii) INAUGURAL ADDRESS BY SHRI H. THOITHOI SINGH, HON'BLE MINISTER (EDUCATION), MANIPUR (District Census Officers Conference, Jdy II, 1990) President of Tod,ly'sfimcrion, Director of Census Operations, Deputy Commissioners, ADMs, 1)SOs, SDOs and friends. I am happy to be with you this mGrning ct this important conference which will discuss the preraratory y,(,rk [(Iftl eer sl iT gll( lllenln-.l eringand Hccseliboting operatiorts of the 1991 Census as \\-cll as tle instructions to the Census officers! cnUllierators and supervisors. Over the yeaIS the census has grown not merely qLantitatively but in ql!alitative term~ also, T!-:e cen.\us opera tions in our country are internationally recognised for their excellence amI cO\ren~~e and we also have received international recognition for the prornptness with which the resl.lts 2re published. The organisation of the census operations in a vast country like ours is a gigantic task and calls for thorough and systematic prepa,atiun. The information provided by the census is ur.dou!J. redly a useful tool in planning and implemer,ting welfare programrres and activities. It is only the ~nsu, which gives demographic iluormation even at village and ward level, of urban areas in our country. Without census statistics it Wvdd to almost impossible to consider indeptb, questions relating to planning fer err.plo),rr.ent ar.d manpower, h,ousmg, edccation, health and family welfare, social sen ices .r.d othr maltel'S )'Ihich concern the people. There is hardly any area of IU>tional . concern and endeavour in which the census data are not useful. In view of the gteat importance attached to census data, the census officers have a responsible and crucial role to play in coducting the censos, The census operations of toduj' c211 [or groat attention to minute details since for tte next tell rC4r. ttc ccc,c' 1I"0eld ce tee crly authentic and comprehensive sOUrce of information of our land and people. It is, therefore, very necessary that you get thotQughly acql\ainted with the concepts and definitions used in the census. This will go a long Vi•• y in training the vast army of enumerators and supervisors. Being one of the largest administratiye exercises in the world, the Census of India throws many challenges to everyone invo lved in it. At the same time, it is a privilege to be entrusted with this national task. I am sure, ea(.h one of you wi1l give your best for ensuring the success of the 1991 Ce!'..5us, YOllI' task is indeed very difficult but your ability and willingness would enable you to accomplish your task well. I request you all to give parti~ular attention to the need for total coverage and accuracy in the collection of census data. It should be the endeavour of all of us to ensure that the 1991 Census oflndi. is a tutal success both in term, uf coverage and accuracy of reporting. In order to achieve this each step towards the ul.timate count wo"ld need careful attention and constant supervision. The success of the census depends on the whole hearted involvement of the enumeratoIi and supervisors. In the past censuses for over hundred years these staff drawn from pdmary school teac~ and other such agencies have done yeoman service. You have to inspire them to continue to perform theirdulies in thi, great task. I am glad to note that the third economic census 01 the Central Statistical Organisation is combined with the houseli'ting operations. I hope you will thoroughly train the field staff in canvassing these schedules also. I am sure, you will go into all details pertaining to hou_umbering and houselisting operations and get your doubts clarified by mutoai discussions. I wish this conference all success and my best wishes to everyone of yeu in this huge endeavour of census taking in 1991. I have great pleasure in inaugurating this con t'mence. Now. I fotmaUy inaugurate the conference and wish all SUCCClS. 1'haat )'Ou (lIVl PREFACE It is my ple ..ure to place on record that we were able to publish and release the provisional 'Population totals of 1991 Census in respect of Manipur in our series of publications a. PAPER 1 Of 1991 on 26th March 1991-the day after the release of the provisional population totals for ,he country as a whole by the Registrar General & Census Commissioner ofIndia. In the said PAPER I we presented the population of the State by sex, decadal growth rale, sex ratio and literacy. In the present publication which is a Supplement to our PAPER I, we have presented the data on rural anu "rban population, growth of urban population, Ihe number of towns by tize class atong with population and the number of workers by broad industrial categorio:s. However, these population figures are still provisional. Profound thanks are uue to Shri A.R. Nand., Registrar General & Census Commissioner, GOVI. of India for his constant guide and also to all the other officials of hi' office who had assisted US in bringing out this puhlication. I am also thanktul to the staff members of my office who have worked hard in theeompilatiOil of this Supplement within a short period of time and also to the Director of Printing & Stationery and his office for printing this Supplement with alacrity. A. R. KHAN, February 22, 1992. Director, Census Operations, Manipur. ,. " I "30 ,,)I I '''UII .. Cr-I''''OPUR NOR1~ I ( s: ) ~ \ ~/ lHANLON CHURACHANDPUR r CH~NDEl &tIP""'UICM! " CHAI'IOEL DISrRICT ( \ r CHURACHANDPUR DISTRICT ~ (CI.lABIJNC N {l ,. "0' y $lAT~CU1TAL :$ OI<;.TI IN1EI"'I.IIO"'II. S~e'DIIJISIONAl HE,t,OQUo\ATERS ~ STATE I ~ IMPHAL rr:An " '" WHE~ (,..,S-DIII1510,,", NAME DIHEIH. HIO,," ITS JoI[AOavAR1U'C, Tc::MN NA_ THE FOlh,4HI ,I.PPEAA$ Wf'lHIN ElAACUT<; 110+[ SUB-DI\iISIONAL > ~ '" ... r-- >Q 0- .., 0- w ...J < '" 0 ::E: 0- '" 1'1 X ;z: (X UJ ~ If) <{ :::> ..J III I/) a.. ::)tr 0 III <{ ;;; :; iii ~ >- 2W Z CD ~ ~ ~ 1/1 ~)- 0 % « 0 ~ Z 1/1 - It: 0 W B. ~ N ..J ... :::> w ...J a. < 0 x w '" a. LL .., >Q r- III '" ~ PROVISIONAL POPULATION TABLES-INDIA (xxfii) Provisional Population Table 1 JUlIlAL UlIBAN COMPOSmON OF POPULATION 1991 Decennial growth rate ofpopu- Population, 1991 Urban po- lotion (per cent), 1981-1991 pulation as IDdiafState/Union Territory Total Rural Urban percentage Total Rural Urban of total population, 1991 3 INDIA 844,324,222 627,146,597 217.177,625 25.72 23,56 19.71 36.19 States 1. Andbra Pradesh 66,354,559 4i!,54I,866 17,812,693 26.84 23.91 18.21 42.64 2. Arunachal Pradesh 858,392 753,586 104,806 12.21 35.86 27.64 152.98 3. Assam 22,294,562 19,823,674 2,470.888 11.08 23.58 + 21.93+ 38.63+- 4. Bihar 86,338,853 74,969~64 11,368,889 13.17 23.49 22.51 30.39 5. Goa 1,168,622 689, 01 479,421 41.02 15.9.6 0.62 48.53 6. Gujarat 41,174,343 27,010,042 14,164,301 34.40 20.80 15.01 33.60 7. Haryana 16.317,715 12,272,545 4,045,170 24.79 26.27 21.57 43.07 8. Himachal Pradesh 5,111,079 4,666,255 444,824 8.70 19.39 17.99 36.46 9. Jammu & Kashmir 7,718,700' 5,879,300' 1,839,400' 23.83 28.92 24.38 45.94 !O. Kamatak. 44,806,468 30,~55,766 13,850,702 30.91 20.66 17.23 29.09 11. Kerala 29.032,828 21, 56,457 7,676,371 26.44 14.06 3.26 60.89 12. Madhya Pradesh 66,135,862 5(l,787,815 15,348,047 23.21 26.75 22.11 44.98 13. Maharas.htra 78,748,215 48,251,863 30,496,352 38.73 25.43 18.30 38.66 14. Manipur 1,826,714 1,320,866 505,848 27.69 28.56 26.34 34.73 IS. Meghalaya. 1;760,626 1,431,547 329,079 18.69 31.80 30.80 36.36 16. Mizur-dlIl 686,217 369,177 317,040 46.20 38.98 . -0.74 160.27 17. Nagaland 1,215,573 1,005,478 210,095 17.28 56.86 53.58 74.74 18. Orissa 31,512,070 27,279,615 4,232,455 13.43 19.50 7.28 36.08 19. Punjab 20,190,795 14,189,913 6,000,882 29.72 20.26 16.87 29.11 20. Rajasthan 43,880,640 33,840;522 10,040,118 22.88 28.07 25.10 39.24 21. Sikkim 405,505 368,521 36,984 9.12 28.17 38.91 -27.60 22. Tamil Nadu 55,638,318 36,611,285 19,027,033 34.20 14.94 12.80 19.2& 23. Tripura 2,744,827 2,325,844 418,983 15.26 33.69 27.27 85.75 24. Uttar Pradesh 139,031,130 111,377,720 27,653,410 19.89 25.41 22.44 38.97 25. West Bengal 67;982,732 49,360,718 18,622,014 27.39 24.55 22.99 28.90 Union Territories I. Andaman & Nicoblll: Islands 279,111 204,301 74,810 26.80 47.88 46.87 SfJ.72· 2. Chandigarh 640,725 66,079 574,646 89.69 41.88 129.69 35.90 3. Dadra & Nagar Havoli 138,401 126,681 11,720 8.47 33.49 30.92 69.51 4. Daman & Diu 101,439 53,901 47,538 46.86 28.43 7.89 63.79 5. Delhi 9,370,475 943,392 8,427,083 89.93 SO.64 108.62 46.10 6. Lakshad weep 51,681 22,592 29,089 56.29 28.40 4.50 56.15 7. Pondicherry 807,045 290,111 516,934 64.05 33.51 0.58 63.56 • The 1991 Censu. has not been held in Jammu & Kashmir. The total, rural and urban populations for 1991 an.s proj..,ltd by !he Standing Committee of Expert. on Population Projections (Oetobe-, 1989). + The 19U C..,.". could not be held in Asiam. The decennial growth rates of popu14tion for 1981-91 have been worked 0 ...... the basis of the total, rural and urban population for 1981 obtainetl bj in!C't'\l<>lation. (xx.) Provisional Popul&tloD Table-2 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL WORKERS IN 1981 AND 1991 IN ALL AREAS Persons Males females Perce'ltage Perce~tage Percentage Percentage of increase in Percentage of increase in Percentage of increaso ia workers the number workers the number workers the number India/State or of workers of work.ers of wurkers Union Territory 1981 1991 1981-91 1981 1991 1981-91 1981 1991 1981-91 2 10 INDIA' 36.70 37.68 26.80 52.62 51.56 21.40 19.67 22.73 42.26 SIIIes I. Andhra Pradesh .45.76 45_27 22.57 57.68 55.44 19.25 33.54 34.81 28.42 2.. Arunachal Pradesh 52.63. 47.46 22.49 58.603 54.21 25.69 45.67 39.61 17.74 3. Bihar 32.35 32.56 24.29 50.18 47.95 20.08 13.50 15.69 40.85 4 Goa. 35.35 35.22 15.56 48.48 49.51 18.81 21.88 20.48 8.17 5. Gujarat 37.27 41.17: 33.44 52.91 54.35 24.49 20.66 27.08 57.78 .{>- Haryana 31.63 30:83 '23.09 49.93 47.92 20.92 10.60 11.29 34.83 7. Himachal Pradesh 42.38 42.27 19.09 52.61 49.72 11.53 3l.S6 34.79 31.94 8. Karnataka 40.24' 41.83 25.43 54.59 53.91 19.22 25.33 29.27 39.35 9. Koral. 30.53 32.05 19.74 . 44.89 47.S1 20.98 16.61 16.9{) 16.50 10. Madhya Pradesh ~2.92 42.70 26.08 54.48 52.17 21.93 30.64 32.53 33.92 11. Maharashtra 42.56 ~.84 26.27 53.73 52.03 21.55 30.63 33.02 35.11 12- Manipur 43.Z0 .1.51 £:J.",,"" ~G,30 ';5,3u 25.2.J 39.48 37.50 21.47 13. Meghalaya 45.92 43.06 .23.58 53.96 49.09 20.32 37.49 36.69 28.51 14. Mizoram 45.44 49.36 50.97 52.54 54.37 43.49 37.72 43.94 62.30 15. Nagaland 48.23 44.20 43.76 52.58 4~.61 42.99 43.20 39.25 44.85 16. Orissa 38.01 37.53 18.01 55.86 53.74 15_51 19.81 20.85 25.18 17. Punjab ')1.50 31.44 20.05 53.76 53.34 18.74 6.16 6.78 33.0S 18. Raja:shthan 36.61 38.54 34.83 50.90 49.07 23.84 21.06 27.01 63.72: 19. Sikkim 48.30 53.20 41.18 57.22 53.60 17.29 37.61 52.74 84.71 20. Tamil Nadu 41.73 44.13 21.57 56.58 57.01 16.10 26.52 30.88 33.51 21. Tripura 32.27 31.36 29.93 50.71 47.48 25.21 12.78 14.31 49.76 22. Uttar Pradesh 30.72 32.27 31.74 50.76 49.37 22 20 R.07 12.87 99.64 23. West Bengal 30.17 32.37 33.68 50.30 51.36 26.78 8.07 11.67 80.84 UrU.oa Territories I. Andaman & Nioohar i.lands 36.88 34.88 39.86 56.71 52.95 33.45 10.78 12.86 84_19 2. Charuligarh 34.92 34.78 41.32 54.77 54.01 38.06 9.10 10.52 66.77 3. Dadra & Nagar Haveli 48.92 53.38 45.66 56.32 57.66 38.20 41.33 48.88 56.08 4. Daman & Diu 33.22 37.09 43.38 44.49 50.72 53.16 22.62 23.06 25.26 5. Delhi 32.19 31.64 48.08 52.67 51.53 45.63 6.84 7.67 71.43 6. Lakshadweep 24.39 26.19 37.9{) 39.24 43.86 45.80 9.16 7.48 3.19 7. Pondicherry 30.41 33.16 45.57 47.08 50.47 43.50 13.48 15.48 52.92 -&cludes Assam Ind Jammu & KIsbmi<. 1imits uf the core city or town. EvoD though growin, or keeping orchard!. or grove!. or work.ing. on such outgrowthS fall in the adjoining revenue village it plantatiotts like tea, coffee, rubber, cinchona and other will nol be realistic to lreat such urban oUI8l'0wths as medicinal plantatiom. rural units. At the same time each such ~rea by Itself 1lllly not qualify to be treated as an independent urban A:ricultllraJ Labourers unit. Such areas deserve to be reckoned along with the A person who \Vorh on an.other person's land for ~orc t(lWn and such llrhan outgrowths arc treated as an wages in money, kind of' share is regarded as an Agri(;ul urban agglomeration. The conslituents of an urban tura] Labourer. He or she has 1)0 (isk in the cultivation agglornc:ration should satisfy the condition.o;. of urbanisa but merely works on other's land for wages. He/she tion, contiguity and viability which are the general prin has no right of lease or contract on land on which hel ciples based on whIch urban agglomerations are formed. she works. Work and Workers Workers in Household Industry At the: 1991 CenslIs, work is defined as participation Under thi.~ category inc]ude~ a per!>On who returf1..~ in any economically pr()ductive activity. Such paniciw his/her main activity as ~ngaged in some produdiQn,. pation may be phY5lCai or mental in nature. Work processing, servicing or repair articles or goods such as handloom Wea\iElg, dyeing ca.rpentry etc. and if :>u"h involves not only actual work but also dlective supervi~ sion and direction of work. It also includes unpaid acti"ities arc performed at household industry level. Household Industry is deJirled as an industry conducted wcrk on farm Of in family enterprise. by the head of the hou>ebcld and/or by the member> Df Any persun whu has done ally work (iluJuding unpaid the household at home or within the vill.~ge in rural area~ work on farm or in family enterprise) during one year and only within the precincts of the h(.)use where the precedjng the date of ellumemtion is tre'J_ted as a Worker. household lives in urban areas. Themail.criterion of It such a worker has worked for major part of the year i.e. a Household Indu~try is the participatlOll of one ur more six months (183 days) or more, he is treated as a "maill members. of a household, Further It should relate to productlon, rrocessing, servicing, repair'ing or making worker." If a person has worked for lest than sir< month~ in the year, he or she- is treated as a "marginal worker." and selling (but not merely selling) of goods, Purther. Any person who has not w(lrked at all during the lait the activity should not be on the scale of a Registered one year is a "non-worker'." Factory. Professions such as those practised by pleader, doctor, barher, musician, dancer, dhahi, astrologer etc. The workers are classified into fuur broad cate will not be trealed as household industry. gorie') -vi7. Cultivators, Agricultural tabourers. those engaged in HOllsehoJd Indu!>try and Other Workers. Other Wor'keTs All workers, i.e. those who have been eogaged in some econ()rnic activity during the last one year, Whl} CuItivatQrs are not cultivators or agricl]itllral laboulers or in Househ A BRIEF ANALYSIS 1. our PAPER I OF 1~91 some [>asie demographic there has bee!l an increase of 405,761 persons ;;h()wing dati on 1991 CelUus in the state have been published in a dece!lnial growth rate of 28,56 per cent during 1981-91, ~h 1991. The provisional population of Manipur The de;;adal growth rate of {lOlJulation of the :itate from at lhe 1991 Census is J,X26,714 consisting of 931,511 19()1 o!l.wards has been !' Statement 1 DECADAL VARIATION IN POPULATION SINCE 1901 Ye:u Persolls Decade Percentage Variatioll Decade Variation I 1901 284,465 191 I 346,222 +61,757 +21.11 1921 384,016 +37.194 +10.92 1931 445,606 .! 61,590 , 16.04 1941 512.069 66,463 +14.92 1951 577,635 " 65,566 12.80 1961 780,037 202,402 : 35.04 1971 1,072.753 "292,716 -' 37.53 1981 1,420,953 -\ 348,200 "32.46 1991 1,826,714 f405,761 ,28.56 II rna) be noted that the number of dish iet5 in years earlier than 1951 due to non-availability of :luffi Manipulincreased.from6 in 19K1 toSm 1991. Wherevi:.r ~lent data. Let us have a glimpse of thl;, distributliJ(1 of Oistridwise I.omparison has been made with leference to the population of the state by sex, density and growth rat" 11191 and eaTlier lens-us years, su~h comparisons are in the di5tricts at th~ 1991 Censm compared to the based on tbe reca~t population figures of the districts ~rowth rate of population during 1961-71 and 1971-81 corrCipondtnl to the jurisdictional area! of the 199t in the following Statemem. Census. Such a recasting cannot be made fur CcnSUIl St.t.meat 1 DISTRIBUTION OF POPTiLATlON BY SEX, DENSITY AND GROWTH liTE IN THE D1STRJ€TS IN 1991 State/District Population Density P M F (Per Sq. Km.) 1961·71_----_. 1971·81 1981·91 : & ! -----~----.- ._------,. ,MANIPUR 1,826,714 931,5lJ 895,203 82 37.53 32.46 28.56 Scnapati 206,933 105,047 101,886 63 44.50 49,66 35.1'11 ,Tamengiung 85,572 44,127 41,445 20 22.21 35.31 37.38: Churachandpur 176,043 90,565 85,478 39 51,45 33.93 3089 Chandel 70,734 36,900 33,834 21 39.90 45.76 25.32 Thoubal 290,393 146,913 143,480 565 34.72 27,49 14.81 Bishnupur 179,903 90,415 89,488 363 37.69 30.31 ' 26,91 Imphal 707.184 358,981 348,203 576 37.27 29.06 26.91 lIlhrul 109.952 58,563 51,389 24 28.07 33.29 ! 32.56 In aU the district& of the [,tate the ratio of the sexe .. in Sonapali, Chandel and Ukhrul has reversed. In is in fa\'our Df the males and the heavy ... oncent.ration of Churachandpur there has been a decreasing trend since poplllation is found in the. plain distr:cl~ of Thoubal, 1961 Cen"". However, in Tamenglongdistri,1 though Bishnllpur and Imphal. The den... it) in' thelle dhtdcts the decadal percerrtage growth has declined considerahly is comparable to the most denseI)' populated districts (f the ever increasing trend i~ maintained. III al1lhe three the rest of the country. However, the decennial £,rowth dlstlicts of Thoubal, Bishnupur aJld Imphal there has rate of population in the districts reveab that the growth been a. steady decline in the growth rate of population. rat(.s in the plain di~tricts and Chancel district aTC bdow However, it can be noted that the quantum of declin.: the slate averag' of 28.56 while in the hill dis!, iels of from 1961·71 to 1971·81 was much higher than the decline Senapati, Talllt:llg1ung, ChuradJaTIllpur and Ukhrul lht: ub~ervt:ll between 1971~81 and 1981·91 in these three _growth rate is above thirty per cent. dis.tricts. It will be ~een tha.t the decennial growth rates which The perlentage dil;trictwise dis.tribution of popula show an increasing trend between 1961-71 and 1971-&1 tion from ]961 to 1991. can be seen in the table btl()w~ DlSTRICTWISE PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION FROM 1961 TO 1991 State! 1961 1971 1981 1991 District (Provi- sional) 1 3 4 5 MANIPUR 100.00 100.00 100.00 lOO.Ol' Senapati 9.07 9.54 10.77 11.33 TamenglonB 4.83 4;29 4.38 4.68 Churaohandpur &,5Q 9.36 9047 9,64 Chandel 3.55 3,61 3.97 3.87 Thoub01 11.37 17.oI 16.37 15.90 Ri,hnupur 10.13 10.14 9.98 9.85 IT9JIhal 41).32 41)25 39.:12 38.71 Ukhrul 6,23 5.80 5,84 6.02 ·" ~ T o'l-", J I ,. " Q:) " MANIPUR '1,.00 I t200 - ~;, I 1000 g , ICILOMETIlES 1M: , .. (01) ~ ~ -~:-1 ~ , i 400tl lNTElU.,t,Tl0NAL I I ~TATE '" :1 i: ___n~ ____ ~'~ ______~~~_'~6,- __,-~~~~~"~~_L~_:_:'_~_~~~~~7o,_"_._",_pu_.~~~n~'."_" __ "_[_'~=, ____~~J i II In Imphal and Thoubal districts there has been a It will be seen from the Statement that the stealijl aetaea&e iii ifu. ]1oplllatidli pr.,jklFliClt rir",t cecac'al gruwth r So far as the distribution of the population in the districts is concerned, out of the total population d SEX RATIO OF MANIPUR AND INDIA SINCE 1901 1,826,714 persons In, 'ltit ~Ulte', l.p7,480 p.ersons. or 64.46 per cent onhe total are f"und III the plalll dIstricts Sex Ratj" of Tb9'llbi'll. Bi~hllu III and Imphl\1. A claser 190k into ------t11~ g(iiwdi !If P(J !()'flli! .~~e s~irt¢ #ft.ce tlie Ce.tsils of INDIA MA <.J1PUI{ Igor In t!!rm~ al -vuriatld1l III IIltl!tilatf(tll. slrd'iV~ ._ :I ali Itte~la .. ."l! ft'6ji! t~{ C~'1l!!.l~ \.'I!war4s tfiete 2' hll.$ ~~Il It ttel!; Igwa\4s $fow cfetIItre mtlle groWtH r3f~ §tf5!ilPt!lrtl~, A c6t1ijl~iS(ffi oftlje ~~cadal ~~lt 1901 912 I,OJ7 I1teg (Jf\lie'state (trw th¢ {:cNntl}'ls shdW!i11t IMtoflowmg SlItl¢)'Ij¢l'lt, 1c}li 'J64- 1,029 1921 955 1,041 Igjr 95lJ 1,065, 194} 945 1,055 Statement 3 1951 946 1,036 1961 941 DECADAL VARIATION IN POPULATION 1,015 1971 930 IN INDIA AND MANIPUR SINCE 1901 980 1981 934 .971 1991 92J %1 Year P~r('entage Decadal Variation INDIA MANIPUR 2 3 , Indian Census provides information 'on literacy. For the purpose of the cenSllS, a person who can botb 1901-1911 ) 5.73 21.71 read and. write with understanding. in any lJinguage is 1911-1921 ,(-;-) 0.30 10.92 treated as .lit~rate. .A person who can merely read- but 1921-1931 , 11.00 16.04 cannot. wnle IS not !tttrate, At the 1991 Census, a child 1931-1941 14.23 14.92 below the ·age of seven years, jrrespa.'1ive of whether he 1941-1951 13.31 12,80 orshe can read and write or is attending s~hool has been 1951-1961 21.64 35.04 treated as iUitcrate. A comparative pictu(t;' ~f the lite 1961-1971 24.80' 37.53 - racy ratc! from 1961 to 1991 is given in thcl following 1971-1981 24.66 32.46 State.ment. It .will be seen that the literacy rates of' 1981-1991 23.50 28.56 Ma\ltpur arc hlgber than that of thc country in all the census years flom 1.961 to 1991 for both the seAe •. 12 Supplement Table 3 : POPULATION OF TOWNS Statem.nt 5 Supplement Tobie 3 : APPENDIX LITERACY RATES IN MANlPUR AND INDIA 1961-91 Supplement Table 4 : GROWTH OF URBAN POPULATION INDIA MANIPUR Year Supplement Table 5; TOTAL WORKERS, MAI~ p WORKERS, MARGINA M F M F WORKERS AND THlllR PERCENTAGE TO TOTA POPULATION -----~------_- 18.87 1961 28.31 40.40 15.34 36.04 53.49 Supplement Table 6 : DISTRIBUTION Of MAIN 1971 34.45 45.95 21.97 38.47 53.70 22.87 WORKERS AS CUL TIYATORS, 34.61 1981 43.56 56.37 29.75 49.61 64.12 AGRICULTURAL 'LABOU (41.42) (5345) (2846) (47.45) (61.05) (33.39) RERS, WORKERS INHOlY.lF,. i991 52.11 63.86 39.42 60.96 72.~8 48.64 HOLD INDUSTRY AND OTHER WORKERS Note: Literacy rl::tes f of 1961 [P1d 197] [date I') few whicn p~\f\datiQn agd ihe years .a"'d above. The 1 'here are a maps and charts VisuaUy. scprllment the data presented by the above tables.: rites fur the YI;:U::i 1981 a:ld 1991 :relate to the Jlop~,lati 'n ',,"ge.U seye:1. yeln ,and above. The S ('m£. cf the charts. throw light on se ... ratio, literacy and' liter:~cy rates f'lr the pupldation aged five years wQCke~ by sex. and abOVe in 1981 have heen ~hown in'brackl;);ts. In the p"(eSel~t pub!i.cation which if; a SI,lP.P\t;fJ~?,t SupplemeDt Table 1 '''to PAPER I OF 1991, six taUes on the prov1swnal ',rpopulation wtals have ·been pref>m1ed. These tables ,') ~re the following: This table presents the population of' tht literate -Supplement Table I : PoPULATION AND LITE- ili:li:a~~:d :~~~e~nt~e:t\~~~c;r ':rl~ :~:t ~~hil~ R>II'fES BY RESIDENCE AND, ", S.pplemeot Tlble 1 pOpm~ATIOH AND LITERATES BY RESlDENCE AND SEX 1991 1991 Ce'lSus (Provisional Figures) .------Stat./Distri.t/LJA/City Total Area Population Litefu.tes Town Rural (in I(m') ------~- Urban Pmcns Males Fornales Person~ Males Female< MANIPUR Total 22,327 1,826,714 931,511 895,203 895,223 542,513 352,71G Rural 1,320,866 674,782 646,084 591,162 362,540 228,622 Urban 505,848 256,729 249,119 3()4,O61 179,973 124,088 Nambol M Urban' 15,936 7,948 8,921 5,229 3,692 Samurou NAC Urban 15,446 ;:j~~ 7,665 7,737 4,952 2,785 Lilong (Ihoubal) NAC Urban 14,796 7,481 7,315 8,033 5,060 2,97} I. SENAPA Tl DIST. T(!tal 3,271 206,933 105,047 101,886 57,605 37,007 20,598 Rl:ral 206,933 105,047 101,886 57,605 37,007 20,598 Urban f· TAMENGLONG Total 4,391 85,572 44,127 41,445 37,511 22,092 15,419 DIST. Rural 85,572 44,127 41,445 37,511 22,092 15,419 Urban I 3. CHURACHANDPUR TotaL 4,570 176,043 90,565 85,478 87,093 .50,013 37,080 DIST Rural 142,386 73,557 68,829 65,106 37,845 2T;261 Urban 33,657 17,008 16,649 21,987 12,168 9,819 Churru;bandpur C.T. Urhan 33,657 17,008 16,649 21.987 12,168 9,819 4. CHANDEL DIS_T. Total 3,313 70,734 36,900 33,834 26,495 16,688 9,807 Rut'] 61,121 31,760 29,361 22,559 14,095 3,464 Urban 9,613 5,140 4,473 3,936 2,593 1,343 Moreh NAC Urban 9,613 5,140 4,473 3,936 2,593 1,343 5. THOUBAL DIST. Total 514 290,393 146,913 143,480 126,794 80,512 46,282 Rural 184,217 93,571 90,646 73,518 47,808 25,710 Urban 106,176 53,342 52,834 53,276 32,704 20,572 Lilong (Thoobal) NAC Part Urban 13,407 6,783 6,624 7,316 4,582 2,734 Thoubal M Urban 32,730 16,377 16,353 16,817 10,172 6,645 Yairipok NAC Urban 6,887 3,556 3,331 3,331 2,200 1,131 Sikhong Sekmai NAC Urban 5,333 2,654 2,679 2,469 1,632 ~37 Wangjing NAC Urban 5,619 2,756 2,863 2,500 1,551 949 Hcirok NAC Urban 1,92,\ 952 972 828 562 266 Kakching M Urban 24,451 12,229 12,222 13,394 7,855 5,539 Kakcbing Khunou NAC Urban 8,237 4,091 4,140 3,096 1,874 1,222 Sugnu NAC Urban 3,997 2,098 1,899 1,831 1,192 639 Samurou NAC Part Urban 3,591 I,S4O 1,751 1,694 1,084 610 '6. BISHNUPUR OIST. Total 496 179,903 90,415 89,488 82,874 51,ISO 31,694 Rural 117,063 58,743 58,320 50,239 31,356 18,aU Urban 62,840 31,672 31,168 32,635 19,824 12,811 Namool M-Part Urban . 12,558 6,325 6,233 6,901 4,097 2,804 OinamNAC Urban 5,305 2,606 2,699 2,854 1,727 1,127 BishnupurM Urban 8,020 4,032 3,988 3,981 2,447 1,534 Ningthoukbong NAC Urban 9,258 4,757 4,501 4,154 2,685 1,469 Moirang M Urban 15,417 7,763 7,654 9,348 5,341 4,007 KumbiNAC Urban 7,252 3,613 3,639 3,992 2,430 1,562 KwaktaNAC Urban 5,030 2,576 2,454 1,405 1,097 30& 14 7. IMPHAL DlST. Tutal 1,22~ 707,184 358,%1 348'::(3 421,5~1 25~,m 111,(24 1t"",1 413,622 2()1jAI4 ~,2c. :29,3;0 131,b89 ,1,,81 Urban 203,562 149,567 143,S9S 1~2,217 112,6>.4 79,~43 Andro NAC Urban 6,196 3,437 3,359 2,271 1,334 937 Lamlai NAC Urban 3,605 1,826 1,779 2.(159 1,234 825 Sekmai Eazar NAC Urban 4,406 2,224 2,182 2,570 1,470 1,100 Lam,ang NAC Urban 5,632 2,842 2,790 3,032 1,849 1,183 Lamjac,tLJllgba C.T. Urban 7338 3,tOO 3,73S 4,99() 2,814 2,176 Lilong (Imphal West)NAC Urban 9,420 4,681 4,738 5,729 3,432 2,197 Samurou NAC-Part Urban 11,855 5,941 5,914 6,043 3,868 2,175 Wangoi NAC Urban 6.749 3,388 3,361 3,101 1,916 1,185 Thongkhong I axmi Bazar ]\lAC U,ball 9,904 4,911 4,981 4,609 3,015 1,594 Ma)ang Irnphal NAC Urban 16,529 8,3211 8,2(9 7.1'2 4,125 2,417 Jirlh.r.!M U,ban 5,946 3,079 2,867 3,998 2,350 1,648 lInphaJ UA Urban 200,6)5 I02,95() 97,665 143S46 83,067 60,879 (a) lIt,[>101 M Urh.!! 196,268 10(1,710 95,508 140,956 81,323, 5~,633 (b) Bly,) GOl'inda Urban 4,347 2,240 2,107 2,990 1,744 1,246 (i) Bi';") Govir.da C.T, Urb"D 3,213 1,605 1,6lJR i;245 1,265 980 (ii) Tak~1 O.G. Urban 1,134 &35 499 745 479 266 Namblll M-Part Urhan 3,37B J,6~3 1,715 2,020 1,132 SSB Lnong (1bouhal) 1 8. UKHRl'L D1ST. T... I 4,5~4 I09,9~2 58,563 51,389 55,2)4 34,448 iIl,Roo Rural 109,952 58,563 51,389 55,254 34,448 '0,806 Urban Note : H,e' ~,~4td 11gl r~ vf the ~ I~ te' ~, It tl e tli,o;t.tius;tTl: t'tlf1tish::d by tbt.. Surveyer (iOf.eral of India. M =Mtlnicipality;. NAt =-Nftii ed ArM ('onlmiUt.e; CT. ~Cc:nstls Tc,Vl-n; O.·G. =Ol.t GnW\th, UA, ~ Urb:.n AggIorr."tfiOli, PilPULAIIQN SIZE OF CIIIES/TOWN:; o G 4 L ,0// -... r / I \ . .)-", .// ( ,.l ...,. ..-- I CLASS 111 flO OO~ 109 99~ ) , I , 'i~ :1 ( ) , \ CLA$SIVI10000-19?99) ~ I I r { ;" •• (lA.55Y!50C{;-9999i ! I • CLASS ~I I SHOW ~IICO I .( , i .. : 'r,' __ \ I I \ ~ / c-, f '1 , ~.r ~, ( f I I '( r ( ( ;' U) , f I( N ~i~ U) / 2~_ j \ i I ~:\..' c "w I i ",I I <:: I I "'S; \ I ( I N I O"'~\ IY A MANIPUR LITERACY RATE 1991 ( orSTRrCTwrSE ) In Per cent 80 60 ~6\f, /" .... / ..... ~ .... , 40 "- //6'" "- /' "- / "- _' - _ - _"~q.~ / '-<- - / 20 / 0 80 Person 60 0-- .,..." r- C':': r:-: - - 40 - ~ :-: 20 - 0 :;: IJI .. .. :; a I: :::I i -0 :::I -0 D- o D- .Q D- r. .. g "tI r: :::I :::I D- r. r: 'Qt r: "a 0 r: .l< .1: G r. r. IE ::J III ., s: u .c: 1/1 U ... .! 1:1 m 1:1 .. ... :::I " .t:: U l~ S.pplement Table 1 PERCENTAGE OF URBAN POPULATION TO TOTAL POPULATION AND DECENNIAL GROWTH RATE AND SEX RATIO BY RESIDENCE The provisional population or the State at the 1991 population figures based on the jurisdictions of the res (len'u, eonsi.ts of 1,826,714 persons of which 1,310,866 pective distrirts of 19S I CenSLS. On the basis of the are found in the rural areas of the state. In other words, recast population figures it has teen observed 1l1at the 72.32 percent of the total population of the state proportions of urban population to the total population are found in the: rural areas, Out of the tight districts in the distIicls in 1981 and 1991 are more lJJ Jess com cf the state, in three districts viz. Seuapati, Tan.engioog parahle. Excepting the threE: districts \\there there is and Ukhrul where there is no urban area, tht entire no urban population in 1991, tl:e percentages of urban population has been treated as TLraJ. In tf.e rerndning population to t.he total population in the districts jn five districts. viz. Chura.:handpur, Chandel, Thoubal, 1991 ale slightly high" than those in 1981 except in Bishnupur and Imphal where there arf) towr,s" the Chande1 v"here the plOpulion in 1991 is lower than proportions of the rural population are fair!) large. the proportion in ] 9~J. It wiIJ be seen from Supplement The propGctiollS afrura1 population tc the total popu Table 2 that a significant increase in percentage of urban lation in the district are above eighty per cent in Chura to total populaticn is recorded in Thoubal and Imphal chandput and Chandel districts, while in Thoubal and districts. In Thoubal district t],c FcrcerJngc of urban Bishnupur, the proportions of rural population art above to total population rose from 31.60 in 1981 to 36.56 in lliny pel cent. It is only in Imphal district where the 1991. Similarly in Imrhal district also the percentage: proportion of rural populalion to (he total populatil'~ rose from 36.33 in 1981 to 41.51 in 1991. Funher, tha of the district is slightly below sixty per ccnt. The percentage of urban to tota"i populatiun in Thoubal~ proportions of the nlra1 population to the total poru Bislmupur and lmphal districts is higJ:er than the sMe ~lation in the districts have been presented in"a tabular average of 27.69 while in the remaining districts the form below. pcrcenjage is far below the state average. StatefDistriet Proportion of rural A peep into the decadal growth rate (1981-91) of population to total rural and urban population in the districts presents an population intere!1.ting picture. As for the state the growth rate of rural population is lower than that of the total p6pula MANIPUR 72.3l tion while in the three districts of Sen"pati, Tamenglong Senapati 100.00 and Ukhrul which have no urban population in 1991, Tamengiong 100,00 the growth rates of total and rural population <:.re not Churaehandpur ~O,8~ identical. This is. dlle to the fact that in these three dis ChandeI 86.41 tricts there was urban population in 1981. Further, in Thoubal 64,44 two districts viz, Thoubal and Imphal, the decennial Bishnupur 65.07 growth rate of urban population it, much higher than Imphal 58.49 that of rural population, UHrul 100,00 Coming to the sex ratios for total, rural and urban In 1991 there are eight districts in the state while in the districts, it is observed that in four district, viz. in 1981 the number of districts ofthe state was onl) six. Senapati, Thoubal, Bishnupur and Imphal the sex ratios In order that the two Censuses of 1981 and 1991 may ore higher than that of the state for both total and rural. be ma.de comparable, the population or the districts in The urban sex ratios of Churacbandpur, Thoubal 1981 Census has been calculated by taking the ...... t and Bishnupur arc higher than that of tho state, 20 Sapplemenl Table 2 PERCENTAGE OF URljAN POPULATION TO TQTJU-l'QPJ,JLATION AND DECENNIAL GROWTH RATE AND SEX RATIO BY RESIDENCE 1991 CBNSUS ( PROVISIONAL FIGURES J : State/Di,trict Percentage of necennial Growth Rate 1981_91 Sex Ratio 1991 Urban to rotal (Pema)e,' per 1000 Male,) P Jt:hllation 1981 1991 Total Rural Urban To!al Rural Urban 4 MANTPUR 26.42 27.69 28.56 26.35 34.73 961 957 97(1 1. SENAPATl 6,29 :)5,]7 44.24 970 970 2, TAMENGLONG 6.87 :)7.38 47.52 939 939 3. CHURACHANDPUR 18.71 19.12 30.89 30.23 33.78 944 936 979 4. CHANDEL 13.60 13.59 25.32 25.34 25.20 917 924 pO 5. THOUBAL 3:.60 36.)6 24.81 15.75 44.41 977 969 990 6. B1SHNUPUR 33.07 34.03 26.91 23.39 34.03 990 993 984 7. IMPHAL 36.33 41.51 26.91 16.59 44.99 970 975 963 8. UKHRUL 7.02 32.56 42.57 877 877 Nole: - l. Percentages dur"".n to t"tal population in 1981 Censu, for the districts haV6 been cabul,ted by taking tho recast papulatim figure. based on the jurisdiction of the resJlCctivc districts as at 1991. 2. There are no urban areas in 1991 in Senapati, Twnenglong and Ukhrul distdcts and, as such the urban decennial growUlfate for 1981-91 for th.,e districts Call not he worked out. A.for the rural areas, the growth nttes of these three districts have, howevt.r been calculated taking the rural figUres out} as recast under note 1 above. 0 0 0 GO I/) 0: 0 I- -tl Z W UJ ~ u VI 0: c:: 0 a: U.I UJ W 3= 0 ..J ~ ..t CL .J ct 0:: ~ 0 ctz w ::J U. \3 0 a: N ...J <( ~ ~z -\!J 0 I 1l11~IIWIll~a: 0:: I/) ::l I- 0- 0:: "< / I.!:! 0 :::J :s: .~ z z a: Q « ::l a. ...J ...J 0' 0: ...J :r: 0- ...J ...J - I.!:! U w « ::l ::l zc 0' l- ~ 0 ID « 0- Z « ::l Z c:: 4(.. Z I/) .( ILl a: Z :r: :r: ::t: ::l « 0 0- z 1: ::t: III :.::: :s:~ Q ILl ::t: ::t: 1: ::l - III ~ u U I- ID 0 VI 0:: U.I ~ I/) 0 0:: 0: N I 0 W w :s: ..J ::J a: <( 0 0 I- :::E ..t Z 3= ILl z u - Z ~ a: 0 0 0 '23 Supplemeat Table 3 POPUL-I.TION OFTOWNS " The details oUhe individual towns with reference spread constituting a town and its adj Aning urban out "'to size class, papulation by sex, growth ra.tes in .1971-81. growths or two or more physically c.ontiguous towns and 1981·91, district in which located and sex tatios together with CJntiglious well f..!V\)gllised urban have been fur "i:;ned in Suppleme:1t Table 3. Before outgrowths- which may actually fall withiJl the revenue making further studies on the towns of Manipur, it will limits cf a village ot villages. The cOJJlP.:ments of Imphal be portitte!~t to mention the criteria of an urban area. Urban Agglomeration are Imphal MlinicipaJity, BUoy The criteria used in 1981 Census for determining the Govinda Census Town and Takyel Outgrowth-all the urb~n status of a loe_lity hav. bee, adopted ill 1991 three componeJts forming a ge>gnpl1io.1 c)ltiguity. Census also as shuwn below. Irrespective of the size class of t0W,lS, their dec'1.dal (a) All places with a muniCipality, corporation of growth rates are irratie to the eAteilt of (+) 125,74 per C'l'1t,Joment booird~ or notifie¢ area committee; cerct in the case of Mayang Imphal NAC in 1981-91 a. (b) All vther placci wliich 'satisfied'th. fDllowing against (~) 8.30 per cent of Sugnu NAC during the same criteria: period, The growth tlte during 1981-91 is not compa (i) a minim\]rn popuJatio!1 of 5,000; rable with that of the pre Supplement Table 1991 CENSUS POPULATION OF TOWNS (PROVISIONAL FIGURES) Size Class of Townsj(:ity/ District Population 1991 Growth Rate Sex rati() UA(Town ----._ 1991 (Fc- Persons Males Females 1971-1981 1981-1991 males per 1000 Male,» ALL CLASSES 505,848 256,729 249,119 (+)165.36 (+) 34.73 970 A. Class I (1,00,000 +) 200,615 102,950 97,665 (+) 56.05 (+) 28.0~ 949 1. Imrhal UA Imphal 200,tiI5 102,950 97,665 (+) 56,05 (+) 28.09 949 (a) Impha1 M Impha1 196,268 100,710 95,558 (+) 56,05 (+) 25.31 949 (b) Bijoy Govinda imphal 4,347 2,~4O 2,107 . 941 (i) Bijoy Govinda C,T, impha1 3,213 1,605 1,608 1,002, (ii) Takyel O.G, imphal 1,134 635 499 786 B. Class II (50,()(J().99,999) NlL NIL NIL NIL NlL NIL C. Class III (20,()(J().49,999) 90,838 45,614 45,224 -( I) 116.47 991 1. Churachandpur C.T. Churachandpur 33,657 17,008 16,649 (+)138.50 (+) 62.09 979" 2. Thoubal M Thoubal 32,730 16,377 16,353 (+)226.79 (+) 76.27 999 3. KakchingM Thoubal 24,451 12,229 12,222 (+)146.19 (+) 15.34 999' D. CLASS IV (10,000-19.999) 78,124 39,333 38,791 - (,) 40.57 986· I. Mayang Imphal NAC Imphal 16,529 8,320 8,209 - (+)125.74 981 2. Nambo1M Bishnuput (part in Imphal) 15,936 7,988 7,948 (+)296.54 (+) 21.93 995 3. Samurou NAC Imphal (part in Thouba1) 15,446 7,781 7,665 - (+) 77.23 985· 4. MoirangM Bi,hnupur 15,417 7,763 7,654 (+) 52.85 (+) 20.39 986 -So Lilong (Thoubal)NAC Thnubal (part in imphal) 14,796 7,481 7,315 - (+) 32.91 971> E. CLASS V (5,000-9,999) 122,339 61,732 60,607 (+) 99.65 (+) 95.29 982. 1. Thongkhong Laxmi Bazar NAC Imphal 9,904 4,917 4,987 1,014 2. Moreb NAC Chandel 9,613 5,140 4,473 - (+) 25.20 87()' 3. Lilong (Impbal West) NAC Imphal 9,420 4,682 4,738 - (+) 37.06 1,012 4. Ningthoukhong NAC Bishnupur 9,253 4,757 4,501 - (+) 30.69 946, 5. Kakching Khunou NAC Thoubal 8,237 4,097 4,140 1.010 6. Bi,hnupur M Bishnupur 8,020 4,032 3,988 (+) 32.57 (+) 4U8 98~ 7. Lamjaotongba C.T. imphaJ 7,338 3,600 3,738 1,038 8. KumbiNAC BisbnupUl 7,252 3,613 3,639 - (+) 14.60 1,007 'l. Yairipok NAC Thouhal 6,887 3,556 3,331 - (+) 52.60 937 10. AndroNAC imphal 6,796 3,437 3,359 977 11. WangoiNAC lmphal 6,749 3,388 3,361 - (-) 6.37 12- JiribamM ' Imphal 5,946 3,079 2,867 - (+) 35.38 13. LamsangNAC Imphal 5,612 2,342 2,790 - (+) 23.32 ~~98 14. Wa ,gjing NAC Thouhal 5,619 2,756 2,163 - (+) 20.58 1,0~ 15. Sikhong SekmlIi NAC Thoubal 5,333 2,65-4 2,679 - (+) )208 1'3 16. OinamNAC Bishnupur 5,305 2,606 2,699 -(+) 8.87 1,~3 , 17. KwaklaNAC Bi,hnupur 5,030 2,576 2,454 25 2 4 F. CLASS VI (Below 5,(00) 13,932 1,100 6,832 ( +)501.65 (-)76.25 962 1. Sekmai Bazar NAC Imphal 4,406 2,224 2,182 (+) 9.38 98l 2. Sugnu NAC Thoubal 3,991 2,098 1,899 H 8.30 905 3. Lamlai NAC 1mphal 3,605 1,826 1,119 ( +)33.35 ( +)21.83 914 4. Heirok NAC Thoubal 1,924 952 972 ( +)55.29 1,021 NoteS,: 1~ There are 31 town, (28 statutory and 3 Cen,us towns) in 1991 Census in Manipur against 32 (31 statutory and one Census town) in L981 Census, 2. Loktak Hydro Electric Pr Jject which wa~ a Census town of 1981 and 6 towns of 1981 viz., Karong, Senapati, Tamenglong, Singngat, Ukhrul, Ka!1.ilpokpi and Mao denotified by the State GOY!. have been classified as rural areas as they do not fulfil all the pre~cribed demographic criteria of urban areas. 3. Churachandpur, a town in 1981 later del0tifie.:l oy th~ State G)vt., alld 2 mor~ phces viz., Bljoy Govinda and Lamjaotongba are rec:)gniscd as Ce,l,)US towas for 1991 Genus on demogrJphic considerations. 4. There are 4 new statutory towns, viz.,Xakching Khunou, Kwakta, Andro and Thongkhong LaKmi Bazar, treated as urban units at the 1991 CeltSus. 5. There was nourban agglomeration in 1981. Part of TakYJ} r~·/e,1Ue village c0mpri~ing the office and industrial built up area3 is treated in 1991 as an out-Mowth of Bijoy Govinda Census Town on the basis of g~)graphical contiguity. The Takyol out-growth portion along with Bijoy Govinda C.T. and (mph,( MUllicipaiitytogethcr form the ImphaJ UA in 1991 Censu,. {;. Towns treated for the first time in 1991 are printed in italics. Supplement Table 3 POPULATION OF TOWNS APPENDIX LIST OF CENSUS TOWNS OF 1981 DECLASSIFIED IN 1991 AND CENSUS TOWNS OF 1981 MERGED WITH OTHER TOWNS IN 1991 Declassified towns Merged Towns Name of town Distri.t Population Name of Population Name of the District in 1981 town in 1981 town with which merged 2 4 6 Loktak Hyd~Electric Churachandpur 2,117 Project town SEX-RATIO MANIPUR AND INDIA 1901-1991 1080 1060 I', / / ' '\ I \ / 1040 / \ ',/ \ ',// \\ \ MANIPUR 1020 \ \ \ ~ 1000 \ , ~ :t: \ o \ g 980 \ .- " , IX , w , 0.. , , VI 960 w ..J :z:~ w INDIA u.. 940 920 1901 1911 1921 1931 1941 1951 1961 1971 1981 1991 CENSUS -YEARS SEX-RATIO MANIPUR AND INDIA 1901-1991 1080 !' I', 1060 / ' / '\ I \ / \ \ 1040 - ,// '\ ...... / \ ',/ \ \MANIPUR 1020 \ \ \ g1000 \ « \ , l: o \ ~ 980 \ ..- ...... , IX " w ...... 0.. " , ...... VI 960 w «..J ::E w INDIA u.. 940 920 1901 1911 1921 1931 1941 1951 1961 1971 1981 1991 (ENSt).S YEARS 29 Supplement Table GROWTft OF URBAN POPULATION Thihable shows lb. growth of towns by size class The distribution of towns of each class in the districU in tlU! state from' 19Y1 onward,. It, has been observed .from 1971 to 1991 is shown below. While computiDa that in. 19.7l. there were. 8 towns. only consBting of one the number of towns by size class, tht district in which Class I town, four I£lass V and three Class VI towns. a smdler part of the tOWtl is located has been ignored. There· w.. · no !Own un~ Ci..... D, 111 and 1Y. In 1981', hQwever, !bOlt had been a ri •• in the number of t,owns 'tp 32 and there were towns for every size dass ucept qass II tt>wn. Out of thes. 32 town, in 1981, N1JMBER OF TOWNS BY SIZE CLASS IN 16 towns wer. found under C1.,s VI representing 50 per DISTRICTS (1971-91) SUPPLEMENT GROWTH OF URBAN Size- Class No. of UA./Towns Populatinn 1971 1981 1991 1971 1981 1991 ' 2 ALL CLASSES 32 30 141,492 375,460 505,843 CLASS-I (100,000 & above) 100,366 156,622 200,613 CLASS-II (50,00')-99,999) CLASS-III (20,OC0-49,999) 41,963 90,$38 CLASS-IV (10,000-19,999) 55,576 78,124 CLASS-V (5,000-9,999) 4 17 31,377 62,644 122,331}! CLASS-VI (Below 5,0(0) 16 9,749 58,655 13,93l (a) Refers to the growth of urban populatirm according to the size class given in each Census, (b) Ref ... to the growth of popUlation according to the size class of the town in the 1971 CeDliIlS in ..... pee! of the for 1981 includes population of to MIS whlch existed in 1981 but denotifitd in 1991, 31 T.bl.-~ 1991 CENSUS POPULATION (PROVISIONAL FIGURES, Proportion of population in each size Inter-Ceosal Growth rate dass to total urban population 1971-81 1981-91 1971 1981 1991 (a) (b) Cal (b) 10 II 12 13 14 100.00 100.00 100.00 ( +)165.36 ( +)165.36 ( I 1 34.73 (+)34.73 70.93 41.72 39.66 (+) 56.05 (+) 56.05 (+) 28.09 (+)2531 11.18 17.96 ( +)116.47 (+) 38.47 14.io 15.44 (+) 40.57 (+) 41.93 22.18 16.68 - 24.19 (+) 99.65 ( +)133.73 (+) 95.29 (+)31.36 6.89 15.62 2.75 (-) 76.25 (-) 17.05 (+)501.65 (+)121.99 ---_ d=~e 1971-81' and in the 1981 Census in respect of the decade 1981-91. For It.e purpose of Col. 14 the size class 33 Sopplemenl Table 5 TOTAL WORKERS, MAIN WORKERS, MARGINAL WORKERS AND THEIR PERCENTAGE TO TOTAL POPULATION Census is the Oldy orgallisation in the country which proportions are in favo.ur of the females in Senapati, giver. information on the ecQnomic activi~ies. or the people Tamenglong and Ukhrul In 1981. But in 1991 the fernal .. down to the town and village levels. The economic cannot outdo the males in all the districts. ao(ivitics have been broadlycla.sified into four categories, viz. Cultivaturs, Agircultural Labourers, Household A closer look into the proportions of main workers the, total population by sex in the state and the dii Industry and Other Workers. [n order to distinguish to. tnets 1ft 1981 and 1991 will reveal that, a. has been men a worker from a non-worker, census defines work ,!!\ ttoned carher, the proportion has come down from 1981 p3;rticipatioD in: any economically productive activity. to 1991 for both males and females in the state, At the '.~uch "",tkip"tion may he physical or mental in nature, dIstrict level also Similar trend prevails except in Bish· Work: involve] not only actual work. but also effective nupur where the proportion of workers increased from 'Supervh_ion and direction of work., It also includes 1981 to 1991. This increase from 1981 to 1991 of the unpaid work on farm.or in f~mily enterprise. FLlrther. proportIon of mam workers is contributed by Iligl~er a worker is broadly divided into "main:workcr" and propor.tion of female main workers from 1981 to 1991 "marginal worker". A pmon who has Worked for tho ]~ the major ,part of the yea.r is termed 'as a _"main worker". in t.he said district. we compare proportion of By major part of the )'ear is meant six months (183 days) mam workers by sex 10 both the years we !ind that the males outdo theremales in the state. In 19811hepropor or more, Those who have not worked fer the ~ajor . , tlO~ of male ~I~ workers is higher than that of female part ~f the ~'e:lr, Le. those who have worked for less than' mali). workenln ,five districts vil. Churachandpur, Chan six months (1~3 days) in the year are term~d as del, Thouhal, BlShnupur and Imphal. In Ihe remaining "'marginal workers~'. " three. dlStflCts (Senapati, Tamcnglong and Ukhrul) In Supple;"ent Table 5 tho distribution of total the proportlOn ?f female main workers is higher than worker:;, main workers, marginal woo kers and their that of f!1u\e mam workers. The picture i!; completely per~tage to total population in the rural and ur~an changed In 1991 when the nroportion of male maiB are'lS of the state and the districts by sex have been given. ~vorkers is I~ig~er than that of the female main workerS This table also ~hows the distribution of the workers In all the distracts. hy sex in Imphal UA and Imphal Municipality. It will be seen from the above table that the number of male A comparison of the districts reveals th.t Chandel total workers is more than the number of female tot.1 tops the h~t so far as the proportion of main worker'lt ~o the total population is concerned with 54.60 per cent workers in the state as well as in all the districts. Similar m 1981 and 47.1 I per cent in 1991. A close second posi is the case with reference to the mrun workers. However, lion goes to Senapatl for both 19MI and 1991 with 53,8S in the case of marginal workers Iho situation is the and 44.77 per cents respectively, and the third position reverse, i.t. the number of female marginal workers is more than the number of' male marl;iniil workers in the goes to Ukhrul with SO.08 %in 1981 and 44.04;; in 1991. .tate as well as in the districts except in Ukhrul. ,T~Ollgh the proportion! {If main workers have declined from 1981 to 1991 in the state as well as in tho When we examine the proportions of total workers dlStrlcls (e,cept m Imphal), the opposite is the case so to the total population in the state a"d the districts in 1981 and 1991 it has been observed that the proportion, far as the proportions of malginal worke.rs are concerned~ have slightly declined from 1981 to 1991 for both males For the state as a whole the proportion of marginal ~orkers to the ~oU\1 oopuiation has increased from 2.85 and females in the state. As regards the districts. m 1981 t04,151,n 1991. In 1981 the highest proportion Tamenglong and Churachandpur show an increase in the (IL46) of mnr&mal workers is recorded in Bishnupur proportion of workers. In Tamenglong the proportion rosefrom 51.13 in 1981 to 51.61 in 1991, while in Chura· d'Slnct whlle ,m .1991. the position has shifted to Tamen~long dIStrict With 8,63. Excepting two districts chand pur the proportion increased from 43.57 in 1981 to 44,10 in 1991. In all the remaining districts the propor VIZ ..Bls!mupur and Imphal where the proportions of ~aTgmal ~o.rkers. have d('clined from 1981 to 1991, tions of workers in 1981 are higher than that of 1991. 10 the r"mammg dlstncts the proportion~ have increased Coming to the proportions of workers by seX in the f:-om 1981,to IQ91. The _increa:-e in Tamenglong from a districts, Tamenglong again stands out as an etce-ption mere 0.01 m 1981 to 8.63 In 199i i, an intm,ting feature. where the proportion of male workers in 1991 (51.63%) T~e dedme In thr proportion of marginal workers in. is more than the proportion of male workers in 1981 BlShnu~ur from 11.46 in 1981 to 4,97 in 1991 is another (49.58 %), In all the remaining districts the 1981 pro mterestm~ featu!e. lf we examine the performance ('or portions are higher than that of 1991, In the case of t~(' sexes m margmal wor.ks, it is found that the l'ropor !emale w.orkers their proportions in 1981 are higher than lIons of the female malgmal workers f>r exceed that of In 1991 lD the state as well as in the districts except in the male counterparts in both 1981 and 1991. Churachandpur and Thou bal. In Churachandpur the prorortion of total female workers rose from 38.36 in . ~oming to the rural and urban population of the 1981 to 39.54 in 1991. Similarly in Thoubal the propor· dlstn;ts, the proportions of workers in 1981 and 1991 tion slightly increased from 38.75 in 1981 to 38.94 in 1991. are mor.e or It:['s of the same trend as that or the total When we compare the proportions of tbe males and the populatton. In the, case of Senapati, Tamenglong and females. we find that the -proportion of total male Ukhrul.where there 15 no urban popUlation in 1991, no workers is higher than that of the total female worke" ~~~f::Sl~~n 1~~ :;d ~~~f. between the proportions of in 1981 as well as 1991. In the di.trict., however, the 34 Supplement TOTAL WORKERS, MAIN WORKERS, MARGINAL WORKERS --~~- State/District/UA!City Total Persons Total Total Main Rural Males Population Workers Workers Urban Females ------MANIPUR Total Pers.nTIS 1,826,714 758,204 682.441> Males 931,511 422,4R9 399,831 Female< 895,203 335,715 282,617 Rural Persons 1,320,866 587,441 527,061 Males 674,782 319,979 300,812 Pemales 646,084 267,462 226,249' Urban Persons 505,848 170,763 155,~87 Male> 256,729 102,510 Q9,019 Females 249,119 68,253 56,368 1, SENAPATI DISTRICT Total Persons 206,933 101,757 92,65()J Males 105,047 53,108 49,74~ Female-3 101,886 48,649 42,901 Rural Persolls 206,933 101,757 92_650 Males 105,047 53,108 49,749 Females 101,886 48,649 42,101 Urhan Persons; Males females 2- TAMENGLONG DISTRICT Total Persons 85,572 44,164 36,777 Male\} 44,127 22,788 19,754 Females 41,445 21,376 17,023- Rural Persons 85,572 44,164 36,777 Males 44,127 22,788 19,754 Females 41,445 21,376 17,023 Urban Persons Male, Female~ 3. CHURACHANDPUR Total Petson5 176,043 77,628 63,149 DISTRICT Males 90,565 43,830 39,92(), Females 85,478 33,798 23,22<}- Rural Persons 142,386 68,321 54,8S!)' Males 73,557 37,758 34,134 Females 68,829 30,563 20,746- Urban Persons 33,657 9,307 8,269 Males 17,008 6,072 5,786 Females 16,649 3,235 2.483 4. CHANDEL DISTRICT Total Persons: 70,734 36,267 33,326 Males 36,900 20,001 18,891 Female, 33,834 16,266 14,435 Rural Persons 61,121 32,362 29,908 Males 31,760 17,334 16,315 Female$ 2Q,361 15,028 13,593 Urban Persons 9,613 3,905 3,418 Mal", 5,140 2,667 2,576 females 4,473 1,238 942 35 Table 5 1991 CENSUS ---~ (provisional Figures) AND THEIR PERCENTAGE TO TOTAL POPULATION Marginal Workers Percentage to total p(1pulation of Total Workers Main workers Marginal workers 1981 1991 1981 1991 1981 1991 10 11 12 13 75,756 43.20 41.52 4{),35 37.36 2,85 4.15 \-22.658 46.80 45.36 45.94 42.93 0.86 2.43 , 53,098 39.48 37.50 34.59 31.57 4.89 5.93 60,380 45.96 44.47 43.35 39.90 2.61 4.57 19,167 48.45 47.42 47.72 44.58 0.73 2.84 41,213 43.39 41.40 38.85 35.02 4.54 6.3~ 15,376 35.52 :33.76 32.00 JO.72 3.52 3.04 3,491 42.21 39.93 40.99 38.57 1.22 1.36 1I.RR5 2,8.61 27.40 22.71 22.63 5.90 4.77 9,107 54.31 49.17 54.14 44.77 0.17 4.40 3,359 54.13 50.56 54:00 47.36 0.13 3.20 5,748 54.49 47.75 54.~8 42.11 0.21 5,64 9,107' 54,36 49.17 54.19 44.77 0.17 4,4{) 3,359 5409 50.56 53.96 47.36 0.13 3.20 5,748 54.65 47,75 I 54,44 42,1\ 0.21 504 53.53 53,29 0.24 54,86 54.63 0.23 51.97 51.72 0.25 7,387 5U3 51.61 5U2 42,98 0.01 8,63 3,034 49.58 51.64 49.58 44,77 N 6.87 4,353 52,71 "51.58 52,70 41.08 0.01 \0.50 7,387 52,28 51.61 52.27 42,98 om 8.63 3,034 50.19 51.64 50,19 44.77 N 6.87 4,353 54,39 51.58 54.38 41.08 0.01 10.50 35.58 35.58 41.77 41.77 28,41 28.41 14,479 44.35 44.10 42,29 35.87 2,06 8.23 3,910 49.89 48.4{) 49,04 44,08 0.85 4.32 10,569 38,39 39.54 35,03 27,18 3.86 12.36 13,441 47,23 47.98 45,16 38.54 2,07 9,44 3,624 50.73 51.33 49.98 46.4{) 0.75 4.93 9,817 43.53 44.40 40.06 30,14 3.47 14.26 1,038 31.84 27.65 29,83 24,57 2.01 3.08 286 46.43 35.70 45.14 34.02 1.29 1.58 752 14.89 19.43 12.05 14.91 2.84 4.52 2,941 54.67 51.27 54.60 47.11 0.Q7 4.16, 1,110 58.07 54.20 58,00 51.19 0.Q7 3.01 1,831 51.03 48.08 50.95 42.67 0.08 5.41 2,454 58.17 52.95 58,08 48.93 0.09 4.02 1,019 59.76 54.58 59.68 51.37 0.08 3.21 1,435 56.48 51.18 56.38 46.29 0,10 4.89 487 32.46 4{).62 32.46 35.56 5.06 91 47.63 51.89 47.63 50.12 1.77 396 15,27 27,68 15.27 18.83 8.8$ 36 I 2 4 5. THOU sAt DISTRICT Total PerSonS 290,~93 121,975 108,277 Males 146,913 66,103 63,7U FfmalC5 143,480 55,867 44,5 Rutal Persons 184,217 30,m 1i,412 Males ~j,571 42,742 4{l,769 Females 90,646 37,1~O 30.652 Urban PeJsons 106,176 41,443 36,865, Male, 53,342 23,366 22,973 Females 52,834 18;011 13,892, 6. BISHNUPUR DISTRICT Total Persons 179,903 76,311 67,368 Males 90,415 40,687 37,699 Fe,rl131es 89,488 35,624 29,669 Rural PenlOns 117,063 50,249 44,149 Males 58,743 27,144 ~,606 Females 58,320 23,105 19,543 Urban }\uons 62,840 26,062 ' i3,219 Males 31,672 13,543 !3,09~ Pentales 31,168 12,519 10,n6 7. IMPHAL DISTRICT Total P 'r~ons 707,184 248,749 232,476 Males 358,9S1 147,744 143,394 Females 340,203 101,005 89,082 Rural Persons 413,62:1 158,703 148,860 Mabs 209,414 90,882 88,803 Female,~ 204,208 67,821 60,057 Ufban Persons 293,562 90,046 83,616 Males 149,567 56,862 54,591 Females 14>,995 33,184 29,025 8. UKHRUL DISTRICT Total Persons 109,952 51,353 48,425 Males 58,563 28,223 26,691 FLm!lles. SI,3R9 23,130 21,734 Rural Pers.ons 109,952 51,353 48,425 MaIM S8,563 28,223 2§,69! Pemales 51,389 23,130 21,734 Urban Persons Male, Females IMPHAL UA Urban Persons 200,615 56,499 54,047 Males 102,950 38,073 37,237 Females 97,665 18,426 16,810 IMPHAL M Urban Pernons 196,268 55,007 52,623 Male< 100,710 37,199 36,386 Females --.------95,558 17,808 16,237 J1 10 II 12 13 13,698 42,57 42.00 40.52 37.2& 205 4.72 2,375 46.37 45.(X1 45.96 43.38 0.41 1.62 11,323 38.73 38.94 35.04 31.05 3.69 1.89 9,120 43.91 43.72 42.77 38.77 l.l4 4.95 1,982 47.57 45.68 47.39 43.56 0.18 2.12 7,138 40.21 41.69 38.l! 33.82 210 7.87 4,578 39.65 39.03 35.64 34.72 AOI 4.31 393 43.76 43.80 4286 43.07 0.90 0.73 4,185 35.55 ~4.21 28.42 26.29 7.13 7.92 i- 8,943 47.08 4242 35.70 37.45 11.38 4.97 . 2,988 48.84 45.00 45.01 41.70 3.83 3.30 5,955 45.32 39.81 26.33 33.15 18.99 6.66 6,100 4127 42.92 36.54 37.71 10.73 5.2\ 2,538 49.29 46.21 45.93 41.87 3.36 4.32 3,562 45.24 . 39.62 27~05 33.51 18.19 6.11 2,843 46.71 41.47 34.01 36.95 12.70 4.52 450 47.92 42.76 43.13 41.34 4.79 1.42 2,393 45.50 40.17 24,89 32.49 20.61 7.68 16,273 35.99 35.17 . 33.11 32.87 2.88 2.30 4,350 41.65 4L16 40:90 39.95 0.75 1.21 11,923 ' 30.26 29.01 25.23 25.58 5.03 3.43 9,843 30.86 38.37' I 35.37 35.99 3.48 2.38 2,019 43.26 43.40 42.'14 42.41 0.%2 0.99 7,764 34.43 33.21 28.28 29.41 6.15 3.80 6,430 30.96 30.67 29.14 28.48 1.82 2.19 .t,271 38.86 38.02 38.24 36.50 0.62 1.52 4,159- 2Z.90 23.05 19.85 20.16 3.05 2.89 2,9Al 50.05 46.70 50.08 44.04 0.57 2.66 1,532 49.90 48.19 49.47 45.58 0.43 2.61 1,396 51.47 45.01 50.74 42.29 0.73 2.72 2,928 51.33 46.70 50,84 44.04 0.49 2.66 1,532 50.29 48.19 49.94 45.58 0.35 2.61 1,396 52.47 45.01 51.83 42.29 0.64 2.72 4).65 39.95 1.70 44.82 43.33 1.49 38.05 36,IJ 1.94 - 2,451 28.lti 26.94 1.22 836 36.98 36.17 0.81 1,616 18.87 17.21 1.66 2,384 20.18 .28.03 27.68 26.81 0.50 1.22 8J3 37.30 36.94 37.05 36.13 0.25 0.81 1,571 18.81 18.64 18.06 16.99 0.75 1.65 114 f$____ ~~ ___,~'-- . , , , '''',~ MANIPUR i a:L ' DISTRIBUTION OF MAIN WORKING i,; '! POPULATION BY CULTIVATORS, N AGRICU LTURAL LABOURERS, HOUSEHOLD INDUSTRY AND o >s. i_OTHER WO~~!~~~~91 " '0" I "I ~------!'!:!: "1 \ \ ____ -j-MOh' ~ aT ttll ~ OF 't4£ !l':1IICl." INOtCATt W---- 1U'AL __ ~ <:lilll>lflOW iIIlAM '1O iIIOITU81f1T210 " .2ROTAVITJUJ ya iIIOITAJU'lOq .2f13s:tU08AJ JAS'iUTJ UJI>li)A (j i) OiliA YHT2UQiIII QJOH32UOH I"el 2R3ltY{OW R3HTO (JAI-1012IVORQ) -'y' \ \ '?- 1 \ \ "\ \ i \ V', JAWH~r A " " "- " Y' \ ., \ , 0< i '7 )/ \"j .~ \ I :2 I I" ""i " -'- " \ ~/"3""A"' l., . rd.! .. '~3 l1'l31110lil' MlAjoi Jo\TQT -;. \ tJ)I:::~!~~:~~~:8=~ \.1 .~ .:-.i ,I t'J~ II A "({\ M RUB \ I II, j .. ( ! ,Le. -----j_~::-.- .. ~':\-:---'-~"..:.:.__" en ffi ~ IX o 3: III III a: ~ .J 0 C( ~ III Z l III III 0 u II. iii a: ~ III 0 Q. Z 4 43 Supplement T.ble 6 DISTRIBUTION OF MAIN WORKI;RS AS CULTIVATORS, AGRICULTURAL LABOURERS, WORKERS IN HOUSEHOLD INDUSTRY AND OTHER WORKERS \ Supplement Table 6 shows the distribution of main of maJe "other workers' are 30.72 in 1981 and 34.16 "in workers a'\ cultivators, agricultural lu.bourers, worker" in IY91 as 'gainst 9.44 inlYSI and J5.13 in 1991 for the 10. JlOusehold industry and· other workers in the districts, male~. Similar situation prevails in the rural and urban J -lphai VA and Jmphal Municipality. This tablefurtheL' areUf) also. but the only difference: is that the proportions fives infDrmation about these workers by sex in both of both the sexes are higher in the urban area than f\.lral and urban areas and also the percentages of thesr- in the rural. For e:o:.ample, the proportion of 'Other , 4.:JfTerent catcg()ries of workcr~ to the total main workers. WOTkers~ ill 19~1 is 4~L93intheurbanareaasagains~ 'In 198'1 and 1991. An intere-;ting fe-dture of this table 19.93 in the rural area. is that the proportion of the cultivators to the total workers is h ighcf tha·n that of other categpries (If workerlli in'all the di~l!icts except in hnphal district, lmphal VA Another trertd that is discernible from Supplement and Irnpha\ Municipality. A co,mpal is()n oetween tile Table 6 is mat the proportions of cultivators alld workers k.\es shows that the propc.rtlOll of the female cultivators in household industry declined from 1981 to 1991 while 1S higl1er than that of the malt cuhivatC'Ts in all the hill the proportions of workers engaged in agricultural labour ~i~tricts \ if.. Senapati, Tamcnglong, Churachandpur~ and other works incre'dScd from 1981 to 1991. Thi •. enandel and UkhruL . trend prevail" in both rural and urban areas also. It may be observed from the suid table that Imphal VA Female dominance is o~erved in the next (\\'0 cate and Imphal Municipality stand ouL in cuntrast against g,'\ri~ of work viz. aglicultural labour and household the state and district figures concerning proportions of j""ldu5try. The proportions of the female workers in these ategories of workers particularly ('f those engaged ~ ]WO caleguries Df work are higher than that of I (he cultivators and othc-r \\rorkers. The proportions of cuIti .. male counterparts ~n the state as well as. ~n most of (he vators, and agriculturl.11labourers in these two areas are (jjstricts. A rural-urban comparison of workers in both below 3 ~~ and 2 (I" respective.ly in hoth the censUses of 1981 and J991 in these two categories of work shows 1981 and 1991. The proportion of other workers' in ~hat the pf(l~!rtion or workers in agrk:ultural labour lmphal UA in 1991 is 85.60 while in the case of Imphal .:lfld household industry is higher in the urban area (han Municipality the proportions are 78.67 in 19BI and 85.99 in the rural. . in ]991. Further, the proportions of workers engaged: in household induslry in Imph.l UA and Imrhol Muni It will be seen from the said table that female cipality are comparable with that of the plain district8 d,) minancc is absent in the casc of wotke'fs engaged in vi7. Thouhal. Bishnllpur and Imphal though they are 'oLhL"r works.' For the state a~ a ...... hole the proportions much higher than that of the hill districts. Supplemed DISTRIBUTION OP MAIN WORKERS AS CULTlVATOItS. HOUSEHOLD INDUSTRY AN!) State! District! Total Persons Total Cultiva~ Agrioul- Household Other U.A./City Rural Male, Main tors tural Industry Workers Urban Females Worker! Labouren MANiPUR Total Persons 682,448 389,690 63,350 48,352 181,056 Males 399,831 224,650 26,908 11,683 136,590 Females 282.617 165,040 36,442 36,669 44,466 Rural Perr.ons. S27,()(i1 341,410 48,459 32,157 IOS,tnS Males 300,812 192,418 20,696 6,476 SI.22Z Females 226,249 148,992 27.763 25,681 23.813 Urban Persons 155,387 48,280 14,891 16,195 76,021 Males 99,019 32,232 6,212 5,207 55,368 Females 56,368 16,048 8,679 10,988 20,653 1. SENAPATI Total Persons 92,650 77,069 3,832 1,524 10,225 Mal .. 49,749 39,463 1,817 386 8,083 Female, 42,901 37,606 2,015 1,138 2,142 Rural Persons 92,650 77,069 3.832 1,514 10,225 Males 49,749 39,463 1,817 386 8,083 Females 42,901 37,606 2,015 1,138 2,142 Urban Persons Mal .. Femal~ 2. TAMENGLONG Total Person~ 36,717 29,643 1,187 137 5,71(} Mal •• 19,754 14,609 569 53 4,523 female, 17,023 15,034 718 R4 US7 Rural Person'\ 36,777 29,643 1,287 137 5,710 Males 19,754 14,609 569 53 4,523 females 17,023 15,034 718 84 1,187 Ur~an Pcrs(llls Males Females 3. CHURACHAND- Total Persons 63,149 46,050 3,620 1,646 11.833 PUR Males 39,910 28,039 1,940 745 9,196 Females 23,229 18,011 1,680 901 2.637 Rural Persons 54,880 43,742 3,007 841 7.290 Male, 34.134 26,577 1,5()(i 318 5,733 Female, 20,746 17,165 1.501 523 1,557 Urban Person! 8,269 2,308 613 805 4,543 Males 5,786 1,462 434 427 3,463 femal"" 2,483 846 179 378 1.080 4. (:HANDEL Total PersoM 33,326 24,470 1,939 381 6.536 Males 18,891 12,379 945 141 5.426 female~ 14,435 12,091 994 240 I,II() Rural Persons 29,9Oll 24,023 1,387 320 4,178 Males 16,315 12,123 561 !OI 3.530 Females 13,593 11,900 826 219 ' 648 Urban Persons 3,418 447 552 61 2,353 Mal., 2,576 256 384 40 1.89(;' Females 842 191 168 21 461 45 'aWe' AGRICULTURAL LABOURERS, WORKERS IN 1991 CENSUS OTHER WORKERS (PROVISIONAL FIGURES) Percentage of main workers in Cultivation, AgdcuftutaJ Labourers, Household Industry & Other Workers to total main workerS Cultivators Agricultural WOIkersio Other Workers Labourers Household Industry ;t!J81 1991 1981 1991 1981 1991 1981 1991 9 to 11 12 !3 14 15 16 63.60 . 57.10 I 4.. 99 9.28 9.68 7.09 21.73 26.53 63.96 56.19 3.3t 6.73 2.01 2.92 30.72 34.16 63.10 58.40 7.29 12.89 20.17' 12.98 9.44 15.73 72.02 64.78 4;90 9.19 8.41 6.10 14.67 19.93 73.44 63.97 3.08 6.88 1.37 2.15 22.11 27.00 70.23 65.85 7.2[ [2.27 [7.30 [ 1.35 5.26 10.53 31.80 31.07 5.32 9.58 14.49 10,42 48.39 48.93 33.25 32.55 4.05 6.27 4.10 5.26 58.60 55.92 29.09 28.47 7.69 15.40 33.83 19.49 29.39 36.64 87.60 83.18 2.60 4.14 0.19 1.64 9.41 11.04 81.57 79.32 1.70 /3.65 0.31 0.78 16.42 16.25 94.07 87.66 3.56 4.70 0.47 2.65 1.90 4.99 89.11 83.18 2.27 .4.14 0.32 1.64 8.30 11.04 83.80 79.32 1.39 3.65 0.20 0.78 14.61 16.25 94.75 87.66 3.22 4.70 0.44 2.65 1.59 4.99 ·64.69 7.56 1.42 26.33 50.00 6.11 1.80 42.03 82.81 9:27 0.96 6.96 88.40 80.60 2.53 3.5e 0.23 0.37 8.84 15.53 81.21 73.95 2.41 2.88 0.22 0.27 16.16 22.90 95.34 88.32 2.65 4.22 0.23 0.49 1.78 6.97 89.99 80.60 2.65 3.50 0.20 0.37 7.16 15.53 83.72 73.95 2.56 2.88 0.19 0.27 13.53 22.90 95.86 88.32 2.74 4.22 0.21 0.49 1.19 6.97 56.80 0.D7 0.85 42.28 42.75 0.11 0.73 56.41 80.67 1.07 18.26 78.28 72·92 1.80 5.73 1.28 2.61 18.64 18.14 69.41 70.24 2.03 4.86 0.58 1.87 27.98 23.03 '91.65 77-54 lAS 7.23 2.33 3.88 4.57 11.35 86.84 79.71 1.38 8.48 0.98 1.53 10.80 13.28 80.70 11.86 1.52 4.41 0.25 0.93 17.53 16.80 94.95 82.74 1.18 7.24 1.94 2.52 1.93 7.50 21.98 27.91 4.57 7.41 3.23 9.74 70.22 54.94 17.48 25.27 4.34 7.50 2.08 7.38 16.10 59.85 41.55 34.07 5.56 1.21 8.20 15.22 44.69 43.50 80.91 73.43 4.27 5.82 1.14 1.14 13.68 19.61 13.10 65.53 4.21 5.00 0.68 0.75 21.95 28.72 90.41 83.76 4.27 6.89 1.71 1.66 3.61 7.69 86.69 80.32 2.56 4.64 0.52 1.07 10.23 13.97 80.77 74.30 1.58 3.44 0.48 0.62 17.17 21.64 93.35 87.54 3.65 6.08 0.57 ],61 2.43 4.11 15.13 J3.08 23.75 16.15 8.19 1.78 52.93 68.99 13.95 9.94 25.03 14.91 2.21 U5 58.81 73.60 19.27 22.69 19.27 19.95 29.28 2.49 32.18 54.81 46 5. THOUBAL Total Persons 10S.277 64.232 18,435 7,638 17,972 Male, 63,733 40,174 7,830 1,477 14.252 Females 44,544 24,058 10,605 6,161 3.720 Rut31 Persons 71,412 44,842 12,376 4,922 9,272 Males 40,760 2),038 5,516 710 7,4% Females 30,652 17,804 6,860 4.2.12 1,776 Urban Persons 36,805 19,390 6,059 2,716 S,7{)() Male< 22,973 13.136 2,314 767 6,756 Females 13,892 6,254 3,745 1,949 1,944 6. BISHNVPUR Total Persons 67,368 34,173 9.416 7,676 16,103- Males 37,699 22,033 3,615 1,521 10,530 females 29,669 12,140 5,801 6,155 5,573- Rural Per~ons 44,149 23,315 6,568 4,694 9,51~ Males 14,606 14,960 .',391 854 6,401 Females 19,543 8,355 4,177 3.840 3.171 Urban Persons 21,219 10,858 2,848 2,982 6,531 Mab 13,093 7,073 1,224 667 4.129 Females 10,U6 1785 1,624 2,315 2,402 7. IMPHAL Total Persons 232,416 78,582 23.887 28,724 JOI.28J Male, 143,394 51,916 9,617 7,054 74,747 Females 8Q,082 26,666 14,210 21,670 26,536 Rural Persons. 148,800 63,305 19,068 19,093 47,394 Males 88,803 41,611 1,821 3,148 35,623 Females 60,051 21,@4 ]],241 15,345 ]1,771 Urban Persons 83:616 15,217 4,819 9,031 53.889 Males 54,591 10,305 1,856 3.306 39,124 Females 29.025 4,972 2,963 6,325 14,765 ,8. UKHRUL Total Persons 48,425 35,471 934 626 11,394 Males 26,691 16,037 515 306 9.833 Female, 21,734 19,434 419 320 1,561 Rural Persons 48,425 35.471 934 626 11,394 Males 26,691 16,037 515 306 9,833 females 21,734 19,434 419 320 1,561 Urban Persons Males Female, IMPHAL U.A, Urban Pel'sons 5",047 LOO9 636 6,l3g 46,"64 Mal", 37,237 816 365 2.438 33.618 Females 16,810 193 211 3.100 12M6 lMPHALM. Urban Persons 52'(>23 947 547 5.876 45.253 Mal", 36,386 762 319 2.342 32.963 Females 16,237 185 228 3,534 12,290 47 9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 68.25 59.32 7.33 17.03 12.17 7.05 12.25 16.60 \ 77.05 63.03 4.43 12.29 1.71 2.32 16.81 22.36 56.65 54.01 lUG 23.81 25.96 13.83 6.23 8.35 72.99 61.79 6.94 17.33 11.23 6.89 ~.84 12.99 82.40 66.34 4.23 13.53 1.06 1.74 12.31 18.39 6LIS 5809 10.33 22.38 23.99 13.74 4.50 5.79 55.97 52.60 8.36 16.43 14.59 7.37 21.08 23.60 _ 64.21 57.18 4.92 - JO.07 3.25 3.34 27.62 29.41 43.54 45.(J2 ]J.S5 26.96 31.69 14.Q3 11.n 13.99 61S' 50.73 5.97 11.98 11.20 11.39 21.30 23.90 69.04 58.4~ 4.34 9.59 2.38 4.04 2V4 27.93 4S.61 40.92 s.n 19.55 2639 2U.}5 16.23 18.78 65.87 52.81 5.83 14.88 10.69 10.63 17.61 21.68 '72.62 60.g0 3.82 9.72 2.08 3.47 21.48 26.01 '4.29 42.75 9.29 21.37 25.46 19.65 1().96 16.23 52.10 46.76 6.25 12.27 12.33 12.84 29.32 28.13 6/.29 54.02 5.46 9.35 3.04 5.09 30.21 3].54 36.13 37.38 7.63 1.6.04 28.43 22.86 27.76 23.72 35.15, 33.80 7.10 lU.27 19.95 12.36 37.80 43.57 43.59 36.20 3.96 6.75 3.90 4.92 48.55 52.13 21.35 29.93 12.25 15.95 46.21 24.:13 20.19 29.79 45.44 42.53 9.03 12.81 20.52 12.82 25.01 31.84 5~.14 46.86 4.86 8.81 3.08 4,22 33.92 40.11 26.31 36.12 15.32 18.73 46.80 25.55 1],56 19.60 ~3.17 18.27 3.00 5.76 18.13 11.52 65.00 M.4S 15.51 li.88 2.22 3.40 5,50 6.05 76.17 71.67 8.85 17.13 /4.53 !().21 44.74 21.79 41.88 50 .. 81 S2.01 .73.25 0.67 1.93 0.20 1.29 17.12 23.53 (,S.76 '60.08 0.64 1.93 0.19 1.15 30.41 36.84 Y6.09 89.42 0.71 1.93 0.22 1.47 2.98 7.13 S3.S& 73.25 0.43 1.93 0.13 1.29 15.58 23.53 71.17 60.08 0.48 1.93 0.16 1.15 28.19 36.\ i 97.16 89.42 0.37 1.93 0.10 1.47 2.37 7.; ; 50.82 4.81 1.33 43.04 32.81 2.98 0.52 63.69 75.3J 7.31 2.44 14.92 1.37 1.17 11.36 85.60 2.19 0.98 6.55 90.2R 1.15 1.61 22.01 75.23 2.26 1.80 0.55 1.04 18.52 11.11 78,67 85.99 2.95 2.09 0.59 0.88 5.S1 6.44 98.65 90.5~ 0.81 1.14 0.47 1.40 45.25 21.77 53.47 75.69 SCHEDULES FOR THE 1991 CENSUS 0 .> Z ~ l3 ... IIl ~ E~ en x w . ~ w >- ~ :J 0 '"0 0 > z :" ffi J: 2:'< U ~ ,::! w ~ ;! 81e'J9111U ::? tIIlli:JEtl1l ~ O:n f ~ ~ :: ~ ~ ~ ,_ c ~ :::! > a: 0' I ~ II• ~ .snllE!lS IEI!Jen ~ .I "- ~I :::! ." .; .g~= ..c ., -. ~S ~ a: . ~ _,'" § ! B E ~ 0 'Ii II. ~ ~ ~ z~ ~ ~ .8 _.. ~ '0 2 ~ '" w E : '0 0 ~e z 0 i1 .8 . ;; -.:0 5 IIJZ L ~ 1i ] t . e J ~--j-~:+~~LJ- I ...... •... i_ .... ' .. ~.T ... ~ so 1------_- f~ ~0ITtri-+-t--1-+-L_;L 1).' ! ~ .. III ..J '".. :> '" Q "( w is _~ 0 o CENSUS OF INDIA 1991 INDIVIDUAL SLIP CONFIDENTIAL Location Code ...... "...... ( ) SI. No. of Household 1Pad No ...•.. Code No. of Development Block .. Slip No ...... Name ...... 2 Relationship to head .... ,..... , ..... , 8 Religion ... '3 Male (1)1Female (2) " ...... ~ 9 Whether S.C. (I) or S.T. (2) '" ...... :[J 4 Age ...... c=J 10 Name of Scheduled CastelTribe r... T.. T ....' 5 Marilal slalus .. . 6 Mother tongue ... . 11 Liter~te (1 }/lIliterate (2) . ::··:::·.::~:·.:~:.-.~n 12 Educational atlalnment. Yes 14A Did you work any time a1 all last year? No (HiST/D/R/8/1/0) (lAcludlng unpaid work on farm or In family enterprise) 148 If 'Yes' in 14A. did you work for major part at last year? Yes(l )iNo(2) .0 'Yes' in 148 (C!AUHHI/OW) 15A Main activity last year? .. 'No'in 148 (HISTIDIRl81110) If HHI/OW in 15A (i) Name of establishment ,," (ii) Nature of industry, trade or service (Ii!) Descnption at work (IV) Class of worker", ... 'Yes'in 148-Any other work any lime last year? Yes (C/AUHHIiOW)/No 1~ .. 'No in 14B-Work done any lime last year? (CIAUHHIIOW) If HHIIOW in 158 (I) Name of establishment..."" (II) Nature at Industry, trade or service. .. ..,...... i·····~·····t··· .. ~ (III) Descnptlon of work.. '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' "".. " •.... ".,,'" (IV) Class of worker ... 16A If 'No' in 14A. 5p ekinglavatlable for work? Yes (1 )I~~;~)'''':' '.::':','.'.:, .. ,... ,"""":'.,:,8' . ~ 6B If 'Yes' In 16A. have you e'ler worked before? Yes 111 NOI2~ "'''''' 17A Whether you are an Ex-servicemen? Yest1)/NO(2) ...... " .....B 178 If 'Yes' in 17A, Pensioner(l )INon-Pensioner(2) ...... 18 Birth place .. 22 For all ever-married women only (a) Place of birth .... ·· ...... •...... : : (a) Age at marriage ...... 0 (b) Rural (1 )/Urban (2) ...... ,.... .O (b) Number of children surviving (e) District ...... j ..... j... ) at present (d) State/Country ...... L. ... L. .. L. ...! MaieD Female 0 Total 0 19 Lasl residence ta) Place of last residenee ...... 'O', (b) Rural (1 )/Urban (2) ...... ,...... (c) Number of children ever bor,n alive (c) District ...... L. .. L .. ] (d) State/Country ...... L .. .l.. ... l... .. : Male 0 Female D Total 0 20 Reasons for migration from place of last residence (COder ...... D 23 For currently married women only 21 Duration of residence at the village or Any child born alive during :..... : town 01 enumeration ...... D last one year ...... l ..... ! .r E.mployment (1) I . Business (2) I Education (3) I Family moved (4) 1 IMarriage (5) Natural calamities like drought. floods, etc. (6) Others (7) I ANNEXURES 59 Annexure 1 Annexure 3 LfST.:qr l'i}lNClPAL CENSUS OFFICERS LIST OF SUB-DlVISIONAL CENSUS OFHCHRSr ".p;/:{SUS OFFICERS OF LOCAL BODY . 81. No. Name District/Local Body 51. No. Name Sub-Division! 1. Shri Ch.Birendm Singh, lAS/ Scnopali Local Body Shr; N. Samu Singh, US' f ShrtTC jMi, LisT Tameng/ong 1. Shd G. Poochairung, MCSi Paomata Shri L.P, Gonmei, lAS Shri L. Pashal Singll. MCS J' S/"iR' Ra.;hmi, lAS/ Churachandpur 2. Shri Binod Kispolta, lASI Mao Maram Sm', V.K. Jenti. lAS Silri A. Tontbik~n,a :;ingh, 4. ' 'Shri L.Ft:onm~i, lAS! Chandel MCS SlIr; P. Bila,at Singh, lAS' , 3.',· Shri L. {borneha Singh. MCS Sadnr HiU" West 5. Shri S. Kllnjllbihari Singh, Lis . Thol/bal 4. ' Shri G. Nilmani Sharma, MCSI Sadal' Hill, EllS' ShriL. Haokip, lAS 6. Shri L Giiiigte,'i'ASr .. -~- lIislmupur Shri Ng. Luikhilm, lAS 5. Shri L Shan't1Ktlmar Singh, MCS( Tamcnglong 7. Silri N. K. Jain, (AS/ Imph.l Shr; S. K. Dev Blirman,lAS North .. ShriO:N~bakisilore Singh,lA8'.'·'. / 6. Slrri D. Norhert. MCS! Tamenglong West 8•. Shri r: Thakral, lAst .. Ukhrul Shri P. H. Gonmei. MCS Shr; It Muiva. [AS 7. ~lhri K. Radhakulilar Singh, MCS( Tamenglong Shri Athern Mui~ra, ]vICS 9. Shr; L. Mukullda Singh, MCS lmphal Municipalit)' 8. Shri Ajay Srivastava, lAS Nungb'a 9. Shri S. K. Dev Burman, lAS! Tipaimukh Annexure ~ Shri N. Chaoba Singh,MeS Shri N. Khomdon Singh, MCS Than/on L1S1 OF DTSIRICT 'CENSUS OFFICERS 10. 11. Slrri K. K. Chltetry. MCSI Churaehandpar SI.No. Name District/Lacal Body Silri H. Cyan Prakash, MCS North 12. Shr; Barun M;tra, lAS! ChllYachandpur 1. Shri N. Samu Singh, {AS Senapali Silri T. Siahou, MCS Z. Shr; L. Gun,shwar Sharma: MCS Tameaglnag 13. Shri V. Thangras/am, MCS Singngat 3. Shri R. Mu;va, IASI Chllrachandpur 14. Shri Kh. Aml/jao Singh,MCS Tengnoupai Shr; A. Srivastava, lAS 15. Shr; H. Biramangol Singh,MCSI Chandel 4, Shri Kril;bas Sharma, MCS! Chandel Shri Rajesh Kumar, lAS Shri Binod Xispolla, lAS 16. Shri N Angall Singh, MCS! Cilakpikarong 5. Silri Kh. Dinamani Singh, MCS! Tlwubal Silri G. Paoehairung, MCS Silri Krilwas Sharma, MCS 17. Shri K, BudhichQndra Singh, Thol/bal 6. Shri A. [bod," Singh. MCS Bishnup"r MCS} SllI'i Birachandra Singh, MCS 7. Silri Budhaehanara Singh,IA-SI Imp"al Kakchin& Shri Damn Mitra, lAS 18. Shrj A. MUllindro Sing'!, MCS Shri ph. Ralan Singh, MCSj li.lm"pur ./i. Shri S. Ningthemjao Singh, Ukhrul 19. MCS Shri Th. Ruhinikumar Singh, MCS $1.ND. Name Sub-Division/ SI.No. Nam~ Suh-Divb'ion/ Local Body Local Body RO. Shri H. Shantikumar Sharma, Moiran, 17. Shri M. LokshmikumaY Sil1gh, Ukhr.1 Central MCS! MeS! Shrj R. K. Sukuma, Singh,MCS Shri M. FI Khan, JM!ItJ- 1ft'> ill. Shri Th. Shih.dalta Singh, Imphai East 1 18. Silri Y. Jugintro Singh,MCS! Phungya, Phaisat MCS! Shri Dhananjay Singh, MCS . Shrj N. Angou Singh, MeS 19. Shri M. Luikham. MCS! KallljQng Chassad 22. Shrj H. De/rep Singh, MCS! Imph./ EWit II Shri R. V. LUngrei, MCS Shri K. RurihukJlmar Singh,MCS 30. Shr; Th. Bihari Singh,MCS/ Ukhr"1 South £3. Shrj B. Achouba Sharma.MCSI Imphal West I Shri T. Sitlhou, MCS! ShYi K. .\1'lIIi Singh. Mes Shr; F. R. Khan, MeS U Shri W. Ajit Singh, MCS! Imphal West Jl ------_ Shy; L. Shantikumay Singh,MCS £5. Dr. Suresh Baba, lAS! Jiribam Shri A. Xubcr Singh,MCS! Shri Tit. (iop," Meitei, MCS 1. Shri W, Torjit Singl, [mphal MUllicipality i6. Shri 1. A. Shim ray, MCSI Ukhrul North 2. Shri L. Mohendra Singh Shr; M. LUikham, MeS 3. Shri S. .!ogmdr" Singh