2006/2007 Annual Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2006/2007 Annual Report ICTJFacing the Past to Prevent Future Abuses An annual report magazine 2006/2007 An annual report The AsIA Issue Challenging Legacies of Impunity International Center for Transitional Justice ICTJFacing the Past to Prevent Future Abuses International Center for Transitional Justice ANNuAL RePORT MAGAZINe 2006 / 2007 Interactive Table of Contents Please click on the sections and page numbers below. Front Cover Asia Issue ICTJ Spotlight Core Principals Asia Regional Overview 8 Our Presence 28 Mission Statement From the President 1 Asia Profile The ICTJ’s Engagement 30 Editors’ Note and 2 Khin Maung Shwe 9 with the UN and the EU Table of Contents Preparing Burma for Transition The Importance of 30 Essay Asia Visual Essay Communicating Justice Linking Peace and Justice 3 Cambodia 10 Indonesia /Timor-Leste 11 Interview Nepal 12 Staff Publications, Books, Awards 32 Alex Boraine 4 Financials 34 A Holistic Approach to TJ Asia Feature Supporters 36 Indonesia / Timor-Leste 14 Board of Directors 37 Conversation The Price of Denial Staff 38 Pablo de Greiff 6 How the ICTJ’s Research Last Word Unit Informs the Field ICTJ Productions Brings 40 Africa Regional Overview 18 Transitional Justice to Americas Regional Overview 19 the Big Screen Middle East and North Africa 20 (MENA) Regional Overview Regional Directors 41 Europe Regional Overview 21 Back Cover / Offices Feature Prosecuting Heads of State: 22 Holding Leaders Accountable The ICTJ Prosecutions Team: 23 Restoring the Rule of Law Feature Security System Reform 24 How Security System Reform Can Prevent Future Abuses Feature Lessons from South Africa 26 A Reflection ICTJ core PRINCIPLes ICTJ MIssION StateMeNT The core principles of the ICTJ are reflected The International Center for Transitional in the following five operational guidelines: Justice (ICTJ) assists countries pursuing accountability for past mass atrocity or Prioritize the interests and perspectives of human rights abuse. The Center works in victims and survivors. The Center will always societies emerging from repressive rule or assess and respect the interests of victims, armed conflict, as well as in established often working closely with victims’ organi- democracies where historical injustices zations and human rights advocacy groups. or systemic abuse remains unresolved. Promote compliance with international In order to promote justice, peace, and obligations. The Center will promote reconciliation, government officials and understanding and acceptance of the nongovernmental advocates are likely to obligations of states in responding to rights consider a variety of transitional justice violations, especially of those established approaches, including both judicial and in international law. nonjudicial responses to human rights crimes. The ICTJ assists in the development Shape policy and advice based on a of integrated, comprehensive, and localized rigorous analysis of the national and approaches to transitional justice compris- international context and circumstances. ing five key elements: prosecuting perpe- The Center will undertake each assign- trators, documenting and acknowledging ment with a focused assessment of local violations through nonjudicial means such conditions and relevant international as truth commissions, reforming abusive in- circumstances, rather than approaching stitutions, providing reparations to victims, its work with prior blueprints or rigid and facilitating reconciliation processes. guidelines that predetermine options. The Center is committed to building local Promote local involvement and capacity and generally strengthening empowerment. The Center will prioritize the emerging field of transitional justice, the training and empowerment of local and works closely with organizations and actors so that skills and expertise are experts around the world to do so. By work- transferred to nationals. The Center will ing in the field through local languages, always involve local actors in policy devel- the ICTJ provides comparative information, opment so that initiatives are shaped and legal and policy analysis, documentation, ultimately decided by nationals. and strategic research to justice and truth- seeking institutions, nongovernmental Support and facilitate the work of organizations, governments, and others. organizations and individuals in the transitional justice field. The Center will aim to facilitate communication, net- working, and collaboration among those working in the transitional justice field. Cover: Pandur, Nepal, March 2007. Rachya Bahadur Gurung, a witness of his country’s transition, stands in the mountainous landscape near his home. Photo by Paula Bronstein/Getty Images. This page: Rukum District, Nepal, April 2004. Dilmaya holds her daughter, Bissnu, inside her home in Gipu village. Her husband, a former Communist Party member, has been missing since being kidnapped 13 days earlier because he quit the party. Photo by Ami Vitale/Getty Images. From the President Dear Friends, The period covered in this report has been a particularly exciting one for our institution. A growing need for our assistance in the field, the cross-border dimensions of our endeavors, and the importance of establishing the “pillars” of transitional justice in universal thematic approaches have presented us with significant strategic challenges. In response, we have embarked on a process of regionalization and decentralization of our country-based programs. In an effort to maintain a constant presence in the areas in which we work, we have launched offices in Bogotá, Dili, Jakarta, and Kathmandu, adding to our already established offices in New York, Brussels, Cape Town, Geneva, Kinshasa, and Monrovia. To meet the increasing demand for our expertise around the world, under the leadership of our Board of Directors and our expand- ing donor community, we have grown from an original staff of three to a team of more than 100 staff working throughout the Americas, Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Middle East. In addition, we have hired a team of experienced regional directors to guide our offices around the world. I am pleased to direct your attention to the inside back cover to learn about the prodigious collective experience on human rights and justice accumulated by our new regional directors: Mariclaire Acosta, Suliman Baldo, Patrick Burgess, and Dick Oosting, who join MENA Director Hanny Megally. As a result of these exciting new hires, our strategies and projects are now more grounded in local realities and more strategically engaged with partners and stakeholders; our Juan E. Méndez impact is thus enriched. While regionally shifting our focus, we simultaneously organized our global staff of profes- sionals in thematic teams that contribute specific expertise on each of the transitional justice mechanisms, to ensure that the universality of our principles combines effectively and holistical- ly with the necessary adaptation of strategies to realities on the ground. We have, in fact, formed thematic teams equipped to address prosecutions, truth-seeking, reparations, security systems reform, memorials and museums, gender, and peace and justice. We continue to cultivate relationships with a growing number of transitional justice practitioners and members of the informed public through conferences, fellowships, and trainings, as well as increasing engagement with members of the press. In early 2007 the Center launched a two-year, multinational media training initiative called Communicating Justice in conjunction with the BBC World Service Trust, to bring visibility to and coverage of transitional justice issues in the very countries where transitions take place. Another important innovation is our ability to incorporate the victims’ demands for justice in the context of peace negotiations. Through our thematic program on peace and justice, we organize and generate conversations on this difficult dilemma among human rights activists, conflict resolution specialists, and humanitarian organizations; we also apply these principles in specific peace processes such as the talks in Juba to end the conflict in northern Uganda. Transi- tional justice holds the key to effective post-conflict reconstruction, but it can also offer practical suggestions for peace arrangements that bear the promise of being durable precisely because they harmonize the interests of peace and the interests of justice. This report focuses on Asia, as our presence there expands, deepens our relationship with civil society, and bolsters political will to address the past. In Asia, transitions from conflict to peace are often contested or incomplete, creating a growing desire for transitional justice, which is supported by an emerging generation of human rights activists working to persuade govern- ments to examine the past and take action to ensure that human rights abuses are not repeated. This report highlights important challenges that activists, governments, and civil society in the region face, such as preparing for transition in Burma, working toward accountability in Timor- Leste, and confronting a shroud of denial in Indonesia. Undeniably, the ICTJ has had a resounding impact on the field of human rights since its inception in 2001. I am proud to present you with this report, which vividly highlights our most notable and recent contributions to the field of transitional justice. Juan E. Méndez President President’s Letter Producing this Annual Report has been the readers, supporters, and partners—engage more EdItors’ NotE central
Recommended publications
  • Negotiating Peace in Sierra Leone: Confronting the Justice Challenge
    Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue rDecembeerp 2007 ort Negotiating peace in Sierra Leone: Confronting the justice challenge Priscilla Hayner Report The Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue is an independent and impartial foundation, Contents based in Geneva, that promotes and facilitates 1. Introduction and overview 5 dialogue to resolve armed conflicts and reduce civilian suffering. 2. Background to the 1999 talks 8 114, rue de lausanne 3. Participation in the Lomé talks: April–July 1999 10 ch-1202 geneva 4. Amnesty in the Lomé process and Accord 12 switzerland The context 12 [email protected] t: + 41 22 908 11 30 Rapid agreement on a blanket amnesty 13 f: +41 22 908 11 40 A second look at the amnesty: was it unavoidable? 16 www.hdcentre.org The amnesty and the UN and other international participants 17 © Copyright 5. Other justice issues at Lomé 19 Henry Dunant Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue, 2007 A Truth and Reconciliation Commission 19 Reproduction of all or Provisions for reparations 20 part of this publication The security forces and demobilisation of combatants 20 may be authorised only Reaching an agreement on power-sharing 21 with written consent and acknowledgement of the 6. After the agreement: a difficult peace 22 source. Slow implementation and near collapse of the accord 23 The International Center The Special Court for Sierra Leone 25 for Transitional Justice Implementing the Truth and Reconciliation Commission 26 assists countries pursuing Judicial reform efforts 28 accountability for past mass Creation of a new Human Rights Commission 28 atrocity or human rights abuse. It assists in the development Demobilisation, and reform of the armed forces and police 29 of integrated, comprehensive, and localized approaches to 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Closing the Gap: Symbolic Reparations and Armed Groups
    Volume 93 Number 883 September 2011 Closing the gap: symbolic reparations and armed groups Ron Dudai* Ron Dudai is a PhD candidate at the Institute of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Queen’s University Belfast, and associate editor of the Journal of Human Rights Practice. He previously worked at B’Tselem and at Amnesty International. Abstract The question of whether non-state armed groups could and should provide reparations to their victims has been largely overlooked. This article explores this gap, with a particular focus on symbolic reparations, such as acknowledgement of the truth and apologies. It argues that, while the question is fraught with legal, conceptual, and practical difficulties, there are some circumstances in which armed groups are capable of providing measures of reparations to their victims. The article identifies the issue of attacks on informers as one potential area for armed groups to provide such measures, and demonstrates that in a few cases armed groups have already engaged in actions that could be seen as analogous to symbolic reparations. The article’s main case study is provided by recent actions by the Irish Republican Army (IRA) in relation to its past attacks against suspected informers. While non-state actors have been involved in violence throughout history, the influence of armed groups has been rising exponentially in the last two decades. Armed groups are present in virtually all major areas of violence: for example, Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, Pakistan, Lebanon, Gaza, Colombia, Côte d’Ivoire, Nigeria, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Chechnya, the fragmented set of * The author would like to thank Avner Gidron, Kieran McEvoy, and Tomaso Falchetta for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this article.
    [Show full text]
  • The Search for Post-Conflict Justice in Iraq: a Comparative Study of Transitional Justice Mechanisms and Their Applicability to Post-Saddam Iraq, 33 Brook
    Brooklyn Journal of International Law Volume 33 | Issue 1 Article 2 2007 The eS arch for Post-Conflict Justice in Iraq: A Comparative Study of Transitional Justice Mechanisms and Their Applicability to Post- Saddam Iraq Dana M. Hollywood Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil Recommended Citation Dana M. Hollywood, The Search for Post-Conflict Justice in Iraq: A Comparative Study of Transitional Justice Mechanisms and Their Applicability to Post-Saddam Iraq, 33 Brook. J. Int'l L. (2007). Available at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil/vol33/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brooklyn Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of BrooklynWorks. THE SEARCH FOR POST-CONFLICT JUSTICE IN IRAQ: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE MECHANISMS AND THEIR APPLICABILITY TO POST- SADDAM IRAQ Dana Michael Hollywood* INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................60 I. TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE .......................................................................63 A. Conceptual Overview .....................................................................63 B. Retributive v. Restorative Justice ...................................................67 C. Truth v. Justice...............................................................................69 1. Truth: A Right to Disclosure?.....................................................70 a. Is
    [Show full text]
  • SENATE JUD COMMITTEE -1- January 25, 2012 POSITION STATEMENT: Delivered a Presentation to the Crime Summit
    ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE SENATE JUDICIARY STANDING COMMITTEE January 25, 2012 8:37 a.m. MEMBERS PRESENT Senator Hollis French, Chair Senator Bill Wielechowski, Vice Chair Senator Joe Paskvan Senator Lesil McGuire Senator John Coghill MEMBERS ABSENT All members present OTHER LEGISLATORS PRESENT Senator Gary Stevens Senator Johnny Ellis Senator Fred Dyson Representative Pete Petersen COMMITTEE CALENDAR CRIME SUMMIT - HEARD PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION No previous action to record WITNESS REGISTER ERIN PATTERSON-SEXSON, Lead Advocate Direct Services Coordinator Standing Together Against Rape Anchorage, AK POSITION STATEMENT: Delivered a presentation to the Crime Summit. NANCY MEADE, General Counsel Alaska Court System Anchorage, AK SENATE JUD COMMITTEE -1- January 25, 2012 POSITION STATEMENT: Delivered a presentation to the Crime Summit. DIANE SCHENKER, Project Coordinator Fairbanks Electronic Bail Conditions Project Alaska Court System Anchorage, AK POSITION STATEMENT: Delivered a presentation to the Crime Summit. HELEN SHARRATT, Integrated Justice Coordinator Alaska Court System and Coordinator for MAJIC Anchorage, AK POSITION STATEMENT: Delivered a presentation to the Crime Summit. QUINLAN STEINER, Director Public Defender Agency Department of Administration Anchorage, AK POSITION STATEMENT: Delivered a presentation to the Crime Summit. RICHARD ALLEN, Director Office of Public Advocacy Department of Administration Anchorage, AK POSITION STATEMENT: Delivered a presentation to the Crime Summit. WALT MONEGAN, President and CEO Alaska Native Justice Center Anchorage, AK POSITION STATEMENT: Delivered a presentation to the Crime Summit. JAKE METCALFE, Executive Director Public Safety Employee Association Anchorage, AK POSITION STATEMENT: Delivered a presentation to the Crime Summit. TERRENCE SHANIGAN, Trooper Alaska State Troopers Department of Public Safety Talkeetna, AK SENATE JUD COMMITTEE -2- January 25, 2012 POSITION STATEMENT: Delivered a presentation to the Crime Summit.
    [Show full text]
  • Accessibility, Quality, and Profitability for Personal Plight Law Firms: Hitting the Sweet Spot
    ACCESSIBILITY, QUALITY, AND PROFITABILITY FOR PERSONAL PLIGHT LAW FIRMS: HITTING THE SWEET SPOT By Noel Semple Prepared for the Canadian Bar Association Futures Initiative ACCESSIBILITY, QUALITY, AND PROFITABILITY FOR PERSONAL PLIGHT LAW FIRMS: HITTING THE SWEET SPOT August 2017 © Canadian Bar Association. 865 Carling Avenue, Suite 500, Ottawa, ON K1S 5S8 Tel.: (613) 237-2925 / (800) 267-8860 / Fax: (613) 237-0185 E-mail: [email protected] Home page: www.cba.org Website: cbafutures.org ALL RIGHTS RESERVED No portion of this paper may be reproduced in any form or by any means without the written permission of the publisher. Printed in Canada Sommaire disponible en français The views expressed in this report are those of the author only and do not necessarily reflect those of the Canadian Bar Association. ISBN: 978-1-927014-41-7 2 ACCESSIBILITY, QUALITY, AND PROFITABILITY FOR PERSONAL PLIGHT LAW FIRMS: HITTING THE SWEET SPOT ACCESSIBILITY, QUALITY, AND PROFITABILITY FOR PERSONAL PLIGHT LAW FIRMS: HITTING THE SWEET SPOT By Noel Semple1 Prepared for the Canadian Bar Association Futures Initiative. ABSTRACT Personal plight legal practice includes all legal work for individual clients whose needs arise from disputes. This is the site of our worst access to justice problems. The goal of this project is to identify sustainable innovations that can make the services of personal plight law firms more accessible to all Canadians. Accessibility is vitally important, but it is not the only thing that matters in personal plight legal practice. Thus, this book seeks out innovations that not only improve accessibility, but also preserve or enhance service quality as well as law firms’ profitability.
    [Show full text]
  • National Crime Commission Conference E
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 18 Article 2 Issue 4 February Winter 1928 National Crime Commission Conference E. R. Cass Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation E. R. Cass, National Crime Commission Conference, 18 Am. Inst. Crim. L. & Criminology 497 (1927-1928) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. NATIONAL CRIME COMMISSION CONFERENCE E. R. CASS2 Crime, from whatever standpoint it is considered, is seen to transcend in importance most of the other great problems of the day. It is a more complex, phenomenon than is generally supposed, and is a constant source of degradation of public and private morality. The citizens of many states have been aroused because of crime, more particularly spectacular crime, and the many statements, some accurate, and too many inaccurate, relative to it and the treatment of the criminal. Attempts to determine the exact *crime situation and its causes bring forth marked differences of opinion. Many reforms are proposed, and cover the entire range of administrative activities from the pblice to the final Court of Appeals, and even the conduct of governors in criminal matters. Each separate official agency dealing with crime defends its methods and attempts to place the responsi- bility elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of the Exhibition
    Cover Image: Clive Hyde, The Eyes Have It, 1982; ‘Lindy Chamberlian is driven away in a prison vehicle after the guilty verdict at the Northern Territory Supreme Court, 1982’ INTRODUCTION The ‘Top End’ is a broad canvas, stretching across based Frédéric Mit interpret the ‘Top End’ quite the NT, WA and Qld and, depending on your literally through their iPhone ‘snaps’ comparing a vantage point, also inclusive of Australia’s northern year of skies in both cities, while award-winning neighbours: East Timor, Indonesia and Papua New photographer/writer Andrew Quilty’s Cyclone Guinea, for example. Onto this broad canvas lies Yasi Aftermath investigates the fallout from more a myriad of lives and landscapes, layers of history menacing skies in the cyclone-prone tropics. and drama both epic and everyday. How we see or understand this region and its people is largely the challenge of the photojournalist, charged with From Megan Lewis’s award-winning Conversations capturing the sense of a real-life character or event with the Mob series/publication, portraying Martu Exhibited at Northern Centre for Contemporary Art (NCCA) and Darwin Waterfront, May/June 2014 through the lens of their camera and their readiness life in the Great Sandy Desert, to Martine Perret’s Curated by Maurice O’Riordan, Crystal Thomas & Glenn Campbell to put themselves ‘there’. acclaimed Trans Dili series focusing on transgender life in East Timor, to Ed Wray’s disturbing Monkey NCCA, 3 May to 1 June 2014 Town exposé of a street performing monkey in Glenn Campbell, Brian Cassey,
    [Show full text]
  • Legacies of Silence: the Role of Civil Society in Truth-Telling, Memory and Reconciliation
    Legacies of Silence: The Role of Civil Society in Truth-telling, Memory and Reconciliation May 2015 Legacies of Silence: The Role of Civil Society in Truth-telling, Memory and Reconciliation Legacies of Silence: The Role of Civil Society in Truth-telling, Memory and Reconciliation May 2015 2 Legacies of Silence: The Role of Civil Society in Truth-telling, Memory and Reconciliation Published by Democratic Progress Institute 11 Guilford Street London WC1N 1DH United Kingdom www.democraticprogress.org [email protected] +44 (0)203 206 9939 First published, 2014 ISBN: 978-0-9930751-5-5 © DPI – Democratic Progress Institute, 2015 DPI – Democratic Progress Institute is a charity registered in England and Wales. Registered Charity No. 1037236. Registered Company No. 2922108. Tis publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee or prior permission for teaching purposes, but not for resale. For copying in any other circumstances, prior written permission must be obtained from the publisher, and a fee may be payable.be obtained from the publisher, and a fee may be payable 3 Legacies of Silence: The Role of Civil Society in Truth-telling, Memory and Reconciliation Contents Abstract ......................................................................................6 Introduction ...............................................................................8 Truth Commissions ..................................................................10 Defnition .............................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • A/HRC/34/62 General Assembly
    United Nations A/HRC/34/62 General Assembly Distr.: General 27 December 2016 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirty-fourth session 27 February-24 March 2017 Agenda item 3 Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence Note by the Secretariat The Secretariat has the honour to transmit to the Human Rights Council the report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non- recurrence, Pablo de Greiff, pursuant to Council resolution 27/3. In the report, which should be read in conjunction with his report to the General Assembly (A/71/567), which focused on national consultations processes, the Special Rapporteur addresses the participation of victims in transitional justice measures. GE.16-22946(E) A/HRC/34/62 Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence Contents Page I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3 II. Activities of the Special Rapporteur ............................................................................................. 3 A. Country visits and regional consultations ............................................................................. 3 B. Communications and press releases .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Walk on Campus
    The Walk on Campus A unique, half-day workshop for educators interested in bringing Paul Salopek’s Out of Eden Walk into the university classroom The Walk on Campus WORKSHOP FOR UNIVERSITY EDUCATORS N PARTNERSHIP WITH THE PULITZER CENTER on Crisis Reporting, the Out of Eden Walk is offering half-day workshops on university campuses designed to share Pulitzer Prize-winner Paul Salopek’s style of “slow” journalism on digital platforms. We invite professors across disciplines to join us, whether in journalism, geography, international studies, anthropology, environmental science, education, or other fields. In this practical, fast-pacedI workshop, journalist Grounded in the Walk’s literature and spirit of and educator Don Belt of the University of Rich- innovation, Belt developed his curriculum at mond shares ideas on using Salopek’s historic, Virginia Commonwealth University and the seven-year, 22,000-mile reportage to teach stu- University of Richmond in close collaboration dents to slow down, carefully observe, and use the with Salopek, who is supported by the Knight digital tools in their hip pockets to tell the subtle, Foundation, the National Geographic Society, powerful stories that “fast” journalists often over- the Pulitzer Center, and others. look in the rush to feed a 24/7 news cycle. The Walk on Campus Workshop draws from Belt’s classroom experience and Salopek’s rich “We were inspired by Paul’s work body of work, including more than 150 dispatches to apply the philosophy of slow and feature articles and ongoing innovations in the use of digital cartography, photography, journalism to covering the streets videography, language translations, sound record- and neighborhoods of our ings, social media, and own city.
    [Show full text]
  • Reparations for Gross Human Rights Abuses
    Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Gilder Lehrman Center International Conference at Yale University Repairing the Past: Confronting the Legacies of Slavery, Genocide, & Caste October 27-29, 2005 Yale University New Haven, Connecticut Addressing the Past: Reparations for Gross Human Rights Abuses Pablo de Greiff, International Center for Transitional Justice Available online at www.yale.edu/glc/justice/degreiff.pdf [To be published in Rule of Law and Conflict Management: Towards Security, Development and Human Rights?, Agnes Hurwitz, ed. International Peace Academy (forthcoming)] Introduction While a great deal of attention has been paid to what countries that have undergone transitions to democracy or at least out of conflict have attempted to do against perpetrators of past abuses, much less attention has been paid to these countries’ efforts to do something on behalf of the victims of such abuses. Clearly, both kinds of efforts, the penal and the reparative, can be considered elements of justice, yet an important dimension of the latter has not received sufficient systematic attention. There is a long history –and an extensive literature—on intra- state reparation in the aftermath of war, and a growing history –and accompanying literature—on judicial remedies, including compensation for relatively isolated cases of human rights violations. However, there is very little systematic information available on massive reparations programs. This is surprising, for most of the recent transitional processes have given some consideration to programs of reparations that seek to make up, in some way, for the harms endured by some members or sectors of society. The focus of this paper is therefore, not the judicial resolution of sporadic cases of rights violations, but rather, the types of ‘programs’ that various transitional or post-conflict countries have set in place in order to give some measure of redress to a large universe of victims.
    [Show full text]
  • Language and Jury Decision-Making in Texas Death Penalty Trials
    The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Doing Death in Texas: Language and Jury Decision-Making in Texas Death Penalty Trials Author: Robin Helene Conley Document No.: 236354 Date Received: November 2011 Award Number: 2009-IJ-CX-0005 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Doing Death in Texas: Language and Jury Decision-Making in Texas Death Penalty Trials A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology by Robin Helene Conley 2011 This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.
    [Show full text]