DOCSLIB.ORG

Sante De Sanctis' Contribution to the Study of Dreams Between '800 And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sante De Sanctis' Contribution to the Study of Dreams Between '800 And Sante De Sanctis’ contribution to the study of dreams I J o D R Sante De Sanctis’ contribution to the study of dreams between ‘800 and ‘900 century: The originality of the integrated method Chiara Bartolucci, Giovanni Pietro Lombardo, & Giorgia Morgese University of Rome “Sapienza”, Italy Summary. The article reviews and analyzes Sante De Sanctis’ - an illustrious psychologist, psychiatrist and founder of the discipline of psychology in Italy - research on dream. The analysis of his study of dreams demonstrates how De Sanctis was the only Italian scholar to have broadened the experimental paradigm of Wundtian psychology using an original pluralistic method integrated with a theoretical perspective based on the study of the psychophysical reality of individuals in their totality. De Sanctis’ scientific work on dreams, documented in important national and international articles and monographs published in the 18th and 19th century, appears to exemplify his modern conceptualization of clinical-differential psychological research. Keywords: History of Psychology, Psychology of Dream, Sante De Sanctis, Methods of Experimental Psychology, Gen- eral and Differential Psychology of Dreams 1. Introduction carried out in accordance with the original psychological canons before the appearance of the psychoanalytic model Sante De Sanctis (1862-1935), psychologist and psychia- (e.g., Foschi & Lombardo, 2008; Pigman, 2002). trist, is one of the most representative figures in Italian sci- For Sante De Sactis the first sources of inspiration for the entific psychology (Cimino & Lombardo, 2004; Lombardo scientific analysis of dreams came from the tradition initiated & Cicciola, 2006). De Sanctis is considered to be one of by Jean-Martin Charcot (1825-1893) in Paris at Salpêtrière. the discipline’s founders and primary actors in the period The relevance assigned to research on dreams in France between the two world wars; he held an important role in is evident in the 1851 faculty search promoted by the De- the history of psychology in Italy due to his extensive pub- partment of Philosophy at the Academy of Moral and Po- lications and continuous institutional activity. The scientific litical Sciences that proposed a competition on the theory study of dream was probably the area that, more than any of sleep and dreams from a psychological perspective (see other, made it possible for De Sanctis to become interna- Hervey de Saint-Denys, 1867/1977; see Schwartz, 2000). tionally known due to his study of dreams in accordance The search reflects the gradual change in epistemological with the canons of modern scientific psychology (Lombardo perspective in the study of dreams that was taking place at & Foschi, 2008; Ferreri, 2008). that time (Schwartz, 2000). Between the 19th and 20th century the interpretation of Numerous contributions to the science of dreams were dreams gradually shifted from being based on mystical-reli- published during the following years, some of them directly gious theories to becoming the subject of “scientific” stud- discussing the theories proposed by participants of the com- ies conducted by physicians, intellectuals and philosophers. petition (e.g. Delboeuf, 1885/1993; Hervey de Saint-Denys, Carroy, Ohayon and Plas (2006) highlighted, in a review of 1867/1977; Macario, 1857/1978; Maury, 1861/1862). At that numerous scholars, the lengthy process of secularization of time, the introspective dream report was considered as a dreams that took place between the end of 19th century precious and valid testimony of what had been perceived, and beginning of the 20th century. The Freudian myth of felt, or thought by the dreamer. Researchers were studying psychoanalysis according to which psychoanalysis was the the phenomenological descriptive features of dreams rather first psychological study of dreams, while the pre-psycho- than their meaning for a particular dreamer, and various ex- analytic study of dreams was essentially interpreted as be- periments were designed to determine what independent ing somatic or medical, has also been critiqued as part of factors might influence the content of dreams (Schwartz, this review. It is only recently, however, that some historical 2000). works have brought light to the numerous studies on sleep Sleep and dreams in France was studied by two catego- ries of professionals and amateurs (Carroy, 2010). Among the first Philippe Chaslin (1857-1923), René Artigues (1853- Corresponding address: 1921), Jean-Martin Charcot and Pierre Janet (1859-1947) Chiara Bartolucci, Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psy- framed dreams within a diagnostic perspective (see Sau- chology, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, University of ssure, 1926). The famous neurologist Jean-Martin Charcot Rome “Sapienza”, Italy. and his studies tried to individuate a differential framework Email: [email protected] of dreams in a comparison of hysterics and epileptics. In the “Tuesday Lessons” (Leçons du mardi à la Salpêtrière Submitted for publication: June 2015 1887-1888, 1888-1889) the French neurologist insisted Accepted for publication: December 2015 that dreams in hysterics were characterized by terrifying 22 International Journal of Dream Research Volume 9, No. 1 (2016) Sante De Sanctis’ contribution to the study of dreams I J o D R zooscopic images and highlighted the similarities with the to dreams could be classified as: subjective or direct in- dreams of alcoholics. Pierre Janet’s studies confirmed this trospective methods (Maury, Hervey de Saint Denys); ob- peculiarity as well as the presence of persecutory dreams jective methods (Calkins, Mourly, Vold); eclectic methods and insomnia in hysterics. Janet did not carry out a system- (De Sanctis); and inquiry or questionnaires (Jatrow, Child, atic study dedicated to the topic, but addressed the ques- Heerwagen). In his 1911 work Vaschide, analyzing the vari- tion of dreams based on paralysis and fixed ideas in “L’etat ous methods used by his colleagues, attributed the merit of mental des hysteriques” (1894). Janet observed that the re- having used an “eclectic” method to De Sanctis by which ported content of dreams in hysterical patients was strongly Vaschide meant that several methodologies were used si- correlated with paralysis; one example was his patient Jus- multaneously. tine who woke up with one arm in a state of contraction after A first analysis of works by the authors cited above leads having dreamt. A second consideration was the recurrence to the classification of studies within two perspectives: one of dreams in patients: hysterics repeatedly had the same that emphasized the organic aspects and one that empha- dreams for several consecutive days. This supported the sized the more specifically mental aspects (Carroy, 2010). theory of fixation in hysteria. Various studies on sleep and dreams were also carried Carroy (2012) shows how, in the first half of the nineteenth out in Germany at the time. Many of the internationally rec- century, the psychology of dreaming that was emerging in ognized studies that were also cited by De Sanctis were pri- France was used to defend an advanced idea of psychol- marily based on psychophysiological techniques and tried ogy. In France the dream and the subconscious are placed to identity the process of sleep and dreams through the at the center of a general psychology rather than medical use, for example, of the sleep cycle. psychology (Carroy, 2012). Amongst Emil Kraepelin’s students, Friedrich Heerwagen Alfred Maury (1817-1892) was one of the first in France (1864-1941), a German physician, conducted various sta- to make systematic observations of his dreams using di- tistical studies on sleep that led to a publication in Wilhelm rect introspective method and he also used experimental Wundt’s (1832-1920) publication Philosophische Studien methodology in the study of dreams (Pigman, 2002; Car- (Heerwagen, 1889). The research was in general based on roy, 2010). The scholar, a supporter of the “in two” observa- the use of questionnaires, statistical techniques and the tion method, used the same olfactory stimulants on himself analysis of the sleep cycle. Heerwagen, together with Edu- to induce dream content (Maury, 1878). Maury’s method, ard Robert Michelson (1861-1944), continued the research based on the notion that the dreams have a somatic ori- on sleep and dreams at the University of Dorpat (Estonia) gin, is included amongst the physiological theories along using a primarily psychological and psychophysiological with Mary Whiton Calkins’ work (1863-1930) (Cimino & method (Weber & Burgmair, 2009). Lombardo, 2004). Maury was a “dreaming scientists” as As in France, the first psychophysiological studies in Ger- Hervey de Saint-Denys (1822-1892). Hervey de Saint-De- many that analyzed variations in sleep and dream in relation nys and Gabriel Tarde (1843-1904) used Maury’s method to the physiological causes that impact the organism grad- and dedicated themselves to the systematic collection of ually left room for oniric theories that saw dreams as the their own dreams. Hervey de Saint-Denys transcribed his result of mental apparatus (cf. Cimino & Lombardo, 2004). dreams upon waken for about 1946 nights while Gabriel Heinrich Spitta, a philosopher and psychologist at Tubingen Tarde collected his dreams between 1870 and 1872; the (1849-1929) was one of the primary scholars in the German dreams were published in an unedited text published in school. Spitta adopted two of Maury’s techniques: the use 2009 by Carroy. Hervey de Saint-Denys, despite his affir- of a sleep diary and provoking or stimulating the sleeper. mation of the close correlation between sleep and dreams, Spitta gave great importance to the analysis of the neuro- declared that he did not want to focus on the physiologi- physiological processes and defined oniric phenomena as cal processes that occurred in the nervous system (Hervey being created by external stimuli as well as by internal cere- de Saint-Denys, 1867). Joseph Delboeuf (1831-1896) and bral activity, underlining the importance of intrapsychologi- Philippe Tissié’s (1852-1935) work was also in agreement cal factors in the formation of the dream.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sante De Sanctis (1862–1935), a Forerunner of the 20Th Century Research on Sleep and Dreaming Renato Foschi, Giovanni Pietro Lombardo, Giorgia Morgese *
    Sleep Medicine 16 (2015) 197–201 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Sleep Medicine journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/sleep Historical Issues in Sleep Medicine Sante De Sanctis (1862–1935), a forerunner of the 20th century research on sleep and dreaming Renato Foschi, Giovanni Pietro Lombardo, Giorgia Morgese * Archive of the History of Psychology, History of Psychology Laboratory, Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: This article aims to reconstruct the elements of continuity and/or discontinuity in Sante De Sanctis’ (1862– Received 8 May 2014 1935) contributions in the scientific understanding of sleep and dreaming as compared to the scientific Received in revised form 8 July 2014 research of his time. An Italian psychologist and psychiatrist, De Sanctis, in his work conducted between Accepted 1 August 2014 the 19th and 20th centuries, has framed the study of dreams using multi-methodology. In addition, De Available online 13 November 2014 Sanctis experimentally established the correspondence between the deep and desynchronization phases of sleep with respect to dreaming. In this context, De Sanctis’ subjects described the periodicity of Keywords: sleep and consciousness, influencing the explanations of the themes that modern sleep research has, after History of the dream psycho- and neurophysiology decades, systematically studied. We demonstrate that De Sanctis’ work has been underestimated, and Dreaming and sleeping phases in our opinion, deserves to be reconsidered as a source of the psychophysiological explanation of dreams REM and Non REM sleep and sleep. Finally, we present a graphical representation of De Sanctis’ psycho- and neurophysiological Activation-synthesis hypothesis model of dreaming.
    [Show full text]
  • Alfred Binet: Charcot's Pupil, a Neuropsychologist and a Pioneer in Intelligence Testing
    https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X20170097 HISTORICAL NOTE Alfred Binet: Charcot’s pupil, a neuropsychologist and a pioneer in intelligence testing Alfred Binet: pupilo de Charcot, neuropsicólogo e pioneiro nos testes de inteligência Hélio A. G. Teive1, Gladys M. G. Teive2, Norberto Dallabrida2, Laurent Gutierrez3 ABSTRACT The psychologist, Alfred Binet, who worked under the supervision of Prof. Charcot at the end of the 19th century, made several important contributions to neuropsychology, in partnership with Théodore Simon. Most notable among these was the development of intelligence testing scales. Keywords: psychology; neuropsychology; intelligence tests. RESUMO Alfred Binet, psicólogo, que trabalhou sob a supervisão do professor Charcot, no final do século XIX, tem várias importantes contribuições na área de neuro-psicologia, particularmente a criação de escalas com testes de inteligência, com a participação de Théodore Simon. Palavras-chave: psicologia; neuropsicologia; testes de inteligência. Jean-Martin Charcot (1825–1893) is world famous as the of Charcot’s pupils, Charles Féré2. In Charcot’s service, Binet father of modern neurology. However, although extremely began to attend clinical meetings and acquired an interest in important, his contributions to internal medicine, geriatrics, studies of hysteria and hypnosis. He later became very inter- psychiatry and psychology are less well known1. Because of ested in experimental psychology, particularly after Charcot’s his great intellect and the leadership he exercised among his death in 18932,3. He applied several times for a chair of psychol- peers, he had many pupils, some of whom were famous, such ogy, first at Collège de France as successor to Théodule Ribot, as Pierre Marie, Babinski and Gilles de la Tourette, as well as where he competed with Pierre Janet, another of Charcot’s others who stood out in various fields of neuroscience and pupils, and then at the Sorbonne, where he competed with neuropsychology, like Alfred Binet2.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: Goodbye to Hebephrenia
    Appendix: Goodbye to Hebephrenia Despite the complex regional variance that is visible throughout the history of schizophrenia’s classification, we tend to also find classi- fiers continuously returned to archetypal ‘foundational’ schizophrenia subtypes such as hebephrenia . As such, for much of the first half of the twentieth century hebephrenia was fairly easy to find in asylums and their records, unlike catatonia . Yet although hebephrenia was more visible than catatonia, and although it held sway in much of official classification, the history of twentieth-century conceptualisation of schizophrenia reveals a growing lack of confidence in even this core concept. Possibly, its demise has its roots in comments made by Bleuler in 1924, when he admitted that hebephrenia ‘now constitutes the big trough into which are thrown the forms that cannot be classed with the other forms’ (1916/1924, p. 426). It may also have had its demise in changing asylum conditions, for by 1945 we can find that Rapaport would argue that hebephrenia, like catatonia, was now becoming increasingly rare. It perhaps only represented cases who had become deteriorated and that ‘in general relatives do not bring hopeless cases to our hospital’ (Rapaport, 1945, p. 19). [The reference to patients not being bought to the hospital possibly also reflects a growing public disil- lusionment with treatment, or distaste for lobotomy, which would see its usage begin to decline by 1948, prior to the introduction of chlor- promazine (Gelman, 1999).] Rapaport, as such, found room in his study for ‘chronic unclassified schizophrenia’, ‘coarctated preschizophrenia’ (marked anxiety, blocking, withdrawal, sexual preoccupation, feeling of strangeness, incompetence, extreme inhibition of affect), ‘over- ideational preschizophrenia’ (obsessions, wealth of fantasy, introspec- tion, self-obsession, and preoccupation with own body), deteriorated paranoid schizophrenia, and so forth.
    [Show full text]
  • TEN YEARS of ITALIAN HISTORIOGRAPHY of PSYCHOLOGY: a Field in Progress
    History of Psychology © 2010 American Psychological Association 2010, Vol. 13, No. 3, 215–249 1093-4510/10/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0020093 TEN YEARS OF ITALIAN HISTORIOGRAPHY OF PSYCHOLOGY: A Field in Progress Glauco Ceccarelli Guido Cimino and Renato Foschi University of Urbino “Sapienza” University of Rome This article briefly outlines a picture of the activities and research conducted in Italy on the history of psychology during the last 10 years, focusing its attention on institutions, scholars, conferences, archives, journals, and so forth. At the dawn of the 21st century, the tradition of historical-psychological studies that developed in the last quarter of the 20th century has led to a renewed situation in teaching organization and research, with the emergence of several groups, especially at the universities of Rome “Sapienza,” Bari, Milan-Bicocca, and Urbino, and of a second generation of young historians increasingly engaged on an international level. After a general survey conducted with historiometric method on the principal areas of research cultivated and on the themes dealt with, we mention a change that has occurred in the historiographical approach, a transition from a historiography addressed prevalently to the “history of ideas” to one that, pursuing the approach of a new and critical “multifactorial” history, proves to be more attentive to the social and institutional history, in correspondence with established international trends. Keywords: Italian historiography of psychology, historiometry, old history, new history, multifactorial history An article published in this same journal in 2003 traced the itinerary of the historiography of psychology in Italy from the 1970s up to the threshold of the 21st century (Cimino & Dazzi, 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts 22-25 July 2014
    BOOK OF ABSTRACTS 22-25 JULY 2014 1 PROGRAMME OULU 22-25 JULY 2014 Tuesday 22nd 10.00ff Registration 12.00-12.30 WELCOME - Opening words 12.30-13.30 Lunch 13.30-15.30 Aurora Auditorium Merikoski Auditorium SYMPOSIUM: Perspectives on the Histo- SYMPOSIUM: Amateurs in the human and so- ry of Environmental Human Sciences cial sciences reconsidered Chairs: Väyrynen & Ruuskanen Chair: Nathalie Richard Väyrynen: Ethics and Politics of Stationary Carroy: Marcel Sembat’s psychology State Economy: Malthus vs. J.S. Mill Plas: “The Society of animals”: animals as em- Ruuskanen: Scarcity as a Research blems, natural history as sociology Framework: Conventional Ideas and New Vistas in the Humanities Podgorny: Archaeology and Confidence Men. The Travels of Joseph Charles Manó in South Niemi: One Man’s Relationship with Na- America, 1870-1886 ture Ended up to a Proposal of National Parks in the Nordic Countries Richard: The boundaries of amateurism: ar- chaeologists and “tourists” in provincial learned Virkkala: The Kantian sublime and its idea societies, France, 19th Century of natur 15.30-16.00 Coffee break 2 16.00-18.00 PSYCHOLOGY AND POLITICS MEDICINE AND PSYCHOLOGY IN ANTIQUITY Chair: Dennis Bryson AND EARLY MODERN ERA Chair: Christian Allesch Laine-Frigren: Expert Knowledge and Poli- tics in Hungary after 1956 – Case of Psy- Basic: Cycladic Pregnant Figures: Reflection of chology Contemporary Medical Reality Pléh: Networks in the life and science of a (Atat: Principles of medication…) left-wing liberal psychologist… Kallinen: Sparks of Soul or Godly Creation? An Vajda: Arthur Koestler and the Great early modern controversy on the origin of souls Schools of Psychology Brauns & Miller: On an early idea of psychology Robinson: How NATO brought Soviet so- or on the history of psychology in the 16th cen- cial psychology to America tury 18.30-ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Historiographic Categories in the History of Italian Psychology. Sante De Sanctis Between Psychiatry and Psychology
    Historiographic categories in the history of Italian psychology. Sante De Sanctis between psychiatry and psychology. by Giovanni Pietro Lombardo* ABSTRACT - Sante De Sanctis, psychologist and psychiatrist, is one of the most representative figures in Italian scientific psychology. Considered among the founders of the discipline and one of its main protagonists in the inter-war period, in the massive bulk of his scientific writings (more than three hundred works of general psychology, psychopathology, pedagogic psychology, criminal psychology and infantile neuropsychiatry) and in his uninterrupted institutional activity, he left a tangible mark on the history of psychology in our country. In 1901 he obtained the Psychology professorship at the Philosophy Faculty in Rome, and a few years later was appointed to the first chair in Experimental Psychology at the University of Rome. At an international level, De Sanctis is the best known among Italian psychologists: some of his work has appeared in French, Swiss, American, German, Scandinavian and English journals and several books have been translated into English and German. He is the only Italian along with other second generation psychologists (Binet, Külpe, Münsterberg, Stern, Claparède, Ebbinghaus) to integrate the classical paradigm of Wundtian physiological psychology, in an attempt at the methodological and epistemological expansion of the discipline. The aim of this paper is therefore to bring out the originality of his clinical-differential experimentalism which in the 1900s founded the psychology discipline, which with De Sanctis proved capable of “dialoging” with the main representatives of the variegated Italian scientific, cultural and academic world, consisting mainly of physiologists, psychiatrists, anthropologists, criminologists, biologists, philosophers, many of whom had a neo-Kantian training, and pedagogists.
    [Show full text]
  • Clés Des Songes Et Sciences Des Rêves. De L'antiquité À Freud
    BOOK REVIEW published: 15 August 2016 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01172 Book Review: Clés des songes et sciences des rêves. De l’Antiquité à Freud Giorgia Morgese * Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy Keywords: Clés des songes, sciences des rêves, oneirocritica, interpretation of dream A book review on Clés des songes et sciences des rêves. De l’Antiquité à Freud Edited by Jacqueline Carroy and Juliette Lancel, Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 2016 Clés des songes et sciences des rêves edited by Jacqueline Carroy and Juliette Lancel, explores the art of interpreting dreams from Ancient times to Freud. The aim of this paper is to analyze the western tradition of studying oneirocriticism: the book of interpretation of dreams, clés des songes. The authors have chosen to use the “longue durée” approach in their study of the history of dream interpretation (“longue durée” is an expression used by the French Annales School of historical writing to designate their approach to the study of history, which gives priority to long- term historical structures over events). This approach involves analyzing human dreams from case studies according to the intellectual, social, and historical contexts. Carroy and Lancel follow Edited by: the same approach used by Pick and Roper’s (2004) book, but with a focus on what they called Jennifer Michelle Windt, Monash University, Australia “genre littéraire d’écrit et de pratique bien particulier” (a very particular kind of literary writing and practice) in Western history. So the book is probably one of the finest books dedicated to the Reviewed by: history of clés des songes putting emphasis on German and French context.
    [Show full text]
  • Sick? Or Slow? on the Origins of Intelligence As a Psychological Object☆
    Intelligence 41 (2013) 699–711 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Intelligence Sick? Or slow? On the origins of intelligence as a psychological object☆ Serge Nicolas a,⁎, Bernard Andrieu b, Jean-Claude Croizet c, Rasyid B. Sanitioso a, Jeremy Trevelyan Burman d,⁎⁎ a Paris Descartes University, France b University of Lorraine, France c University of Poitiers and CNRS, France d York University and The MEHRIT Centre, Canada article info abstract Article history: This paper examines the first moments of the emergence of “psychometrics” as a discipline, Received 8 May 2013 using a history of the Binet–Simon test (precursor to the Stanford–Binet) to engage the Received in revised form 11 July 2013 question of how intelligence became a “psychological object.” To begin to answer this, we used Accepted 6 August 2013 a previously-unexamined set of French texts to highlight the negotiations and collaborations Available online 4 October 2013 that led Alfred Binet (1857–1911) to identify “mental testing” as a research area worth pursuing. This included a long-standing rivalry with Désiré-Magloire Bourneville (1840– Keywords: 1909), who argued for decades that psychiatrists ought to be the professional arbiters of which Binet (Alfred) children would be removed from the standard curriculum and referred to special education Mental testing classes in asylums. In contrast, Binet sought to keep children in schools and conceived of a way History for psychologists to do this. Supported by the Société libre de l'étude psychologique de l'enfant Binet–Simon scale Education [Free society for the psychological study of the child], and by a number of collaborators and friends, he thus undertook to create a “metric” scale of intelligence—and the associated testing apparatus—to legitimize the role of psychologists in a to-that-point psychiatric domain: identifying and treating “the abnormal”.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study in the Psychology of Conversion
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1932 A Study in the Psychology of Conversion Dorothy Catherine Kleespies Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Kleespies, Dorothy Catherine, "A Study in the Psychology of Conversion" (1932). Master's Theses. 243. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/243 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1932 Dorothy Catherine Kleespies A STUDY IN THE PSYCHOLOGY OF CONVERSION BY DOROTHY CATHERINE KLEESPIES, A.B. A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Loyola University 1932 VITA Dorothy Catherine Kleespies Born in Dubuque, Iowa, June 3, 1905. Attended St. Joseph Academy, Dubuque, Iowa. Graduated from high school department of St. Joseph Academy, Dubuque, Iowa, June, 1923. A.B., Mount St. Joseph College, now Clarke College, Dubuque, Iowa, 1927. Librarian, Downtown College of Loyola University, Chicago, Illinois, 1927-1930. Librarian, St. George High School, Evanston, Illinois, since August, 1930. Member, Catholic ·Library Association, Illinois Li­ brary Association, and National Catholic Education Association. INTRODUCTION Interest in the psychological aspects of conversion was first aroused in a course in Religious Psychology. Inves­ tigation of the writings of non-Catholic psychologists in the field of conversion was first made while a member of this class.
    [Show full text]
  • The Interpretation of Dreams Sigmund Freud (1900)
    The Interpretation of Dreams Sigmund Freud (1900) PREFACE TO THE THIRD EDITION Wheras there was a space of nine years between the first and second editions of this book, the need of a third edition was apparent when little more than a year had elapsed. I ought to be gratified by this change; but if I was unwilling previously to attribute the neglect of my work to its small value, I cannot take the interest which is now making its appearance as proof of its quality. The advance of scientific knowledge has not left The Interpretation of Dreams untouched. When I wrote this book in 1899 there was as yet no "sexual theory," and the analysis of the more complicated forms of the psychoneuroses was still in its infancy. The interpretation of dreams was intended as an expedient to facilitate the psychological analysis of the neuroses; but since then a profounder understanding of the neuroses has contributed towards the comprehension of the dream. The doctrine of dream-interpretation itself has evolved in a direction which was insufficiently emphasized in the first edition of this book. From my own experience, and the works of Stekel and other writers, [1] I have since learned to appreciate more accurately the significance of symbolism in dreams (or rather, in unconscious thought). In the course of years, a mass of data has accumulated which demands consideration. I have endeavored to deal with these innovations by interpolations in the text and footnotes. If these additions do not always quite adjust themselves to the framework of the treatise, or if the earlier text does not everywhere come up to the standard of our present knowledge, I must beg indulgence for this deficiency, since it is only the result and indication of the increasingly rapid advance of our science.
    [Show full text]
  • Moral Insanity in Italian and Croatian Psychiatric Discourses
    Izvorni znanstveni rad Acta Med Hist Adriat 2017; 15(2);219-252 Original scientific article CRIME AND MADNESS AT THE OPPOSITE SHORES OF THE ADRIATIC: MORAL INSANITY IN ITALIAN AND CROATIAN PSYCHIATRIC DISCOURSES ZLOČIN I MENTALNI POREMEĆAJ NA SUPROTNIM OBALAMA JADRANA: MORALNO LUDILO (MORAL INSANITY) U TALIJANSKIM I HRVATSKIM PSIHIJATRIJSKIM DISKURSIMA Vanni D’Alessio*, Filip Čeč**, Heike Karge*** SUMMARY In the 19th century, fervid debates arose in the young psychiatric science about how to deal with and to scientifically categorize human behaviour which was perceived as dangerous to society, and as criminal. There were two concepts that stood out in these transnation- ally held discussions; namely moral insanity and later on, psychopathy. Following recent approaches in the cultural and social history of psychiatry, we understand moral insanity and psychopathy as social constructs, which are determined by the evolution in psychiatric knowledge, and also by laws, codes and social norms of particular historical timeframes. Our task is to discuss the evolution and adoption of these concepts in two linguistically * Department of History, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Rijeka, Croatia. Department of Social Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Italy. ** Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Rijeka, Croatia. *** Institute for History, Faculty of Philosophy, Art History, History and Humanities, University of Regensburg, Germany. Correspondence address: Vanni D’Alessio, Department of History, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Rijeka, Sveučilišna avenija 4, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia. E‑mail: [email protected]. 219 different, but still historically profoundly entangled regions, namely in Italian and Croatian psychiatric discourses at the turn from the 19th to the 20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Il FONDO SANTE DE SANCTIS 1893-1935
    Il FONDO SANTE DE SANCTIS 1893-1935 Inventario a cura di Elisabetta Cicciola Sante De Sanctis (a destra) con i suoi collaboratori nel laboratorio di psicologia sperimentale di Roma Fondo Sante De Sanctis, 1893-1935, serie 2, fasc. 9.1, 1920 Indice 1. Il ruolo scientifico di Sante De Sanctis (1862-1935) p. 4 2. Nota archivistica p. 8 3. Ringraziamenti p. 10 4. Selezione del materiale fotografico contenuto nella serie 2 “Fotografie” 1897-1927 p. 11 5. Serie 1 “Corrispondenze”, 1893-1935 p. 14 6. Serie 2 “Fotografie”, 1897-1927 p. 84 7. Elenco dei mittenti p. 85 2 IL FONDO SANTE DE SANCTIS, 1893-1935 Responsabile scientifico Giovanni Pietro Lombardo Eventuali richieste di consultazione possono essere indirizzate a: Giovanni Pietro Lombardo Professore Ordinario di Psicologia Generale Responsabile scientifico Archivio di Storia della Psicologia Dipartimento di Psicologia Dinamica e Clinica Via degli Apuli, n. 1, 00185 Roma - Italy Tel. +390649917628 - Fax. +390649917628 E-mail: [email protected] 3 1. Il ruolo scientifico di Sante De Sanctis (1862-1935) Laureatosi in Medicina e chirurgia, Sante De Sanctis ottenne prima la libera docenza in Psichiatria nel 1896 e in seguito quella in Psicologia, presso la Facoltà di Filosofia, nel 1901, tenendo nell’anno accademico 1902-1903 il primo corso di Psicologia con metodi sperimentali. Nel 1903 presso la Facoltà di Medicina ebbe l’incarico dell’insegnamento di Psicologia fisiologica e nel 1905, ricoprì il ruolo di Segretario scientifico del V Congresso Internazionale di Psicologia che si svolse per la prima e finora, almeno, unica volta a Roma, al quale parteciparono alcuni dei più noti psicologi del tempo, sia europei che statunitensi.
    [Show full text]